วีดีโอ

He's weird for thinking his kids should get any of the money.....and I would tell everyone the real reason the wedding was off. He was greedy, and wanted my kids money

Don’t know what was wrong with that step monster. The memories were tucked away in the attic, where she didn’t have to see them or in the OP‘s bedroom again where she didn’t really have to see them if she stayed out of the bedroom. memories are what we have left when our family members pass away. How dare somebody destroy them? It’s not like they were all over the house, staring her in the face they were up in the attic, or in the OP’s bedroom. No need for any of the crap she pulled. Not even thinking that OP wanted to keep those memories of her mother. That step monster didn’t care at all. She just didn’t want any reminders, but she cross the line with what she did.

Stepmonster, that’s a good one, Jess✊

This is from the story from Gossip City, same concept but different take, thoroughly enjoyed watching this video, a great lesson for the grandmother, she lost everything...

Classic heartless Karen!!

Many salutations!!! This is a nice story from a literary and cinematic standpoint; still, I really do not like how divorce is so quickly and frequently resorted to in these stories. (Goes back to rewatch the video) . . . oh damn, Rachel and Mark are not spouses; argh, I feel like the south end of a horse!! Anyway, I have a solution to fix this mess. Why does Mark not establish an LLC with a commercial credit profile for each of his kids?!? An LLC is not hard to establish and the founding documents can be configured so that Mark and Rachel have operational authority -- exempli gratia, Mark having 25% ownership, Rachel having 15% ownership, and the offspring having 10% ownership --complete with a clause that confers majority ownership to the offspring at a specified point in the future such as the offspring's 20th, 21st or even 25th birthday. I cannot imagine there being a better birthday gift than my own LLC with a hefty commercial credit profile!! Along the same lines, Mark could also establish a cash-value living benefits whole life insurance policy so that his kids can be their own bank. Such an insurance policy has a lot of start-up inertia so it makes sense for Mark to start on that right now. Heck, Mark could establish several cash value living benefits whole life insurance policies where each of his offspring is designated as the beneficiary and then one where Rachel is the beneficiary along with one where Sophie is the beneficiary for fun. Rachel could reciprocate in kind . . . hey, the whole Rockefeller Family version 2.0 . . . I like it!!! The only way that this works, though, is if Mark and Rachel get their heads out of their butts and act like adults -- id est, making small Net 30 purchases and paying the bill ASAP without fail. Golden parachute greed has NO PLACE in this.

Well if Mark is jealous perhaps he should marry someone in his weight class. Mark and his ex-wife should be handling his kids stuff. Besides he’s not giving anything to Sophie. You’re not giving anything to his kids seems fair to me. Great job! Goodbye Mark!😂🎉

😮 mark that inheritance has nothing to do with you 😕 mark you start a trust account for your kids

Mike couldn't differentiate between love for a family or love for his best friend, whichbis very different withnone another, a love for family is much more important, especially when mike already a father, and mike also seemed doesn't interest in raising lily, just like to spent time with his friends, proofs that he doesn't want a family but a succesor to his family name. Even whe his wife hospitalized due to fatigue, his promise are only a respite, a way to prevent the family to be torn apart, but in the end it only just words, he doing his promise half heartedlly and without joy of raising a child, and in the end his friends is more important that his family and child. Again proof that he isn't worthy for a family. Now he lost all of it, and when he realize it, he ignores it. What a pathethic man, husband, and father. Neither on one he is worthy for.

By law she has to follow her father's wishes of what is done with the money, especially if a lawyer in involved.

I'm sorry. But Carol taking and giving the nursery stuff away without your permission was actually Stealing! You should have filled a police report, even if she was James's mother! That seems to me to be the only way for Carol to understand that what she did was not only wrong and hurtful, but criminal as well.

she also owes you $1500....id send her to court for that.

Her daughter doesn't "need" the money any more than his children. I don't agree with that statement. I do agree that her daughter should receive the entire inheritance based on the fact the childs grandfather gave it to her. It was grandfather's money to do with what he wanted. Sofie was his flesh & blood granddaughter and he left it to her. Case closed.

What a terrible fiance! Mark is a troll!

Most people show their “true colors” when money 💵 gets involved. The inheritance is being held in trust for Sophie’s education needs from her Great Grandpa. It has NOTHING to do with Mark or his kids. He only wants her money!!

Grandfather wanted her child to have the money. End of story!

She was right. Sophie's grandfather left her the inheritance. He did not leave it to Mark's kids, as they were not his grandchildren when he passed away.

First of all, as far as I understand, an inheritance is not subdued to assets divisions in case of a divorce issue. Secondly, the grandfather that left the inheritance was not related whatsoever to the fiancé's daughters. Besides, Rachel and Mark weren't married yet and had <separate finances> and just that speaks volumes. When referring to the pony for Sophie, Rachel was going to buy it from her inheritance money. If Mark wanted his daughters to have ponies too, shouldn't he pay for them? It seems Mark very conveniently wanted to live off Rachel's money. Eventhough, Rachel suggested they could both pay for the other two ponies, but Mark wanted to guilt trap Rachel. She's way better without such a sly jerk.

What exactly has Mark done to ensure his kids' future? Seems like he can't be bothered to do anything at all for them! What a beggar!

She made the right decision to end the relationship. If the right relationship was there , she’d probably make some kind of trust for his kids. A true blended family loves & takes care of each other. We did. We had a good blended family .

Rachel made the right choice for her daughter. Protecting her daughters future is a must. What I could not understand is Mark is a divorced father of two why wasn’t he having a conversation like this with his ex-wife the two of them should be talking about that to secure their children’s future. It’s not up to Rachel to contribute to their future. It didn’t seem like his children were living with them. They were living with their mother. So Mark and his wife are the ones who should be responsible for his children’s future. Man, he should’ve also taken into the cat when she was telling them that this was her grandfather’s wish to help secure Sophie’s future. But he did not hear that because all he could think about was his children weren’t getting a share of the inheritance money.

She should've secured those documents more properly

Why would they have to pack their bags at a hotel they aren’t staying in?

wow😮 talk about entitled really hard work gets you things in life dosent fall in your lap SIL is jealous

OP..You overreacted..PERIOD! And youve shown your husband that your first reaction is to overreact..then to run from your problems. You really should not married since its obvious you dont know how to handle being in a family!!

Not his grandfather. Not his money.

So let him set up trust funds for the kids that came from his relationship.

Red flag! Red flag ! Protect your child!

I see both sides but if the roles were reversed mark would be seen as the devil

Would he include her child if his children had inheritance? Probably not!

Hey Mark buy your kids a pomy or a trust fund nothing is stopping you Sounds to me Mark all you want is Money for your kids but you want simeone else to pay .. how is that fair

Seriously, Mark needs to stop meddling into Rachel's affairs where it pertains her child! If she doesn't like it he can go and f himself. Seriously Rachel is not an ATM! Mark literally needs to talk to his ex and literally set things up for his kids if he is that concerned about money. It's all on him he should have started out from the start not everything has to be rely on Rachel just because she ended up with the substantial financial increase due to her grandfather's passing

Compromise is important, but Mark couldn't start a trust for his own kids, why should OP? Besides, it didn't sound like Mark wanted to compromise: he wanted OP to handle the financial burdens of his kids while he contributed basically nothing.

He just wants the inheritance

At least it's not favoritism

If he wants his kids to have a trust fund. Then he can start one for his kids. It's not her responsibility for his kids on the trust

Oh sure, I would just give what was my child’s money to step children. Not. I had a friend that got remarried. When her husband found her legal documents he was pissed that he wasn’t getting her wealth upon her death. Pretty creepy. Why was he looking and why did it bother him? Made her feel like he was planning her demise. She divorced him immediately.

If mark had got a inheritance would he do the same x

I’m not sure how to analyze this story who’s right and who’s wrong.

When I remarried my husband and I agreed to keep our assets separate so that we could each leave our assets to our own kids. The only things I inherited on his death were the joint assets we acquired after our marriage. This worked for us because we both had roughly the same value of assets when we married.

So, the parents have children to have free caregivers? As all push the youngest one to be the primary caregiver and most possibly abandon her lifelihood... When in the future the mother & the father pass away, who will support the youngest child's life costs? Who? Anyone can answer?

Why doesn't Mark sit down with his ex wife and plans their kids future? Why does it has to be Rachels responsability?

It's Sophie's grandpa wish.... he isn't responsible for mark's kids... MARK IS THE A-HOLE

It's not their birthday Mark.

Trusts are notoriously difficult to use or get money from because it’s in installments. A simple savings account to transform into a checking account is better. Less paperwork and easier control.

It's fair Mark. Why should Mark's children be included?

Mutual friend Jen perhaps wanted op to have trust funds for Mark's children too.

When someone approaches you with a dumb idea like that you say NO! Because why would i want to get pregnant for someone else your not a baby factory she wanted a child adopt one there are lots of children out there who would like someone to love them..To me thats a line you dont cross and it looks like shes not ready to be a mother..For her birthday just take her out to dinner and have a great time... His mother needed help because you dont disrespect someone like that..In the end your family is more important than anything.🌍👍🌍🙏🌍💯🌍😘🌍🍀🌍

Katen aptly named she is so vindictive & spiteful what does him not college educated have anything to go with it .Her sister chosed him .Hope they got their money back .Her punishment is more than justified.

What a terrible sister-in-law! Karen is a witch!