@@joshjacobus4641 lol sure bud. They died in 76, When the firebird beat its ass. And came back till 2002. The new ones are bad ass. But would rather have had the Firebird, and GTO over it.
Loved what you did with the 302! I know you said a summit cam but what summit cam? Would like to do the same up grades but hard for o do when don’t say what cam it is and no cam specs at all . Love your show just now wish you would do a better job with part numbers and specs!
Gday mates from Australia. Love your Engine videos as we have many of these engines here in Oz. Out of curiosity please, can you tell me the cam specs compared in the Ford 302 comparison. Very curious about the type of cam used to get that extra power. Cheers fellas.
What are the second cam specs on the Ford 302 build? I went to the website (which is horrible to navigate) and couldn't find the specs or the build at all. Not easy to support your sponsors when you can't find what to buy.
Where is there a 400 hp v6 grocery getter? Also, the number of cylinders has nothing to do directly with power lol. But yeah technology has made power numbers a little out of control. In reality, most people can't even drive a 96 Honda Civic to redline on anything but a straight line.
@@captaindrp82400hp in a 5000lb shitbox would get you smoked by the 300hp mild 302 in my mustang II thanks to the 470 million lb curb weight of your exploder. Power to weight ratio is where folks get embarrassed.
Disconnect the positive before the negative? Is that a positive earth car? I was taught in trade school to remove the terminal that WON'T arc out on the frame first.
Which is why you disconnect the positive first. It’s not going to arc if it touches metal if it’s unhooked. The negative will though if you disconnect that first because the positive is still connected.
Man getting old sucks. Got a 351W out of a truck in 1994. Rebuilt with ported and polished stock heads I was into it for about 1,300-1500. I have old receipts for the machine shop, but they have faded. I remember it was so cheap back then lol 😆 The good old days. Even alloy heads were cheap then too
The E7 is adequate until 4000ish RPM with most street friendly cams. For a summer cruiser with a stock automatic that's fine. This is a budget build and aluminum heads can cost over $1000 very easily.
@@DBSSTEELER GT40 heads need special headers and anything from the junkyard needs a rebuild. If I'm going through all that I'll just spend a little more and go aluminum.
@@ahoneyman - Get junkyard engines from a low mileage wrecked vehicle... an unwrecked vehicle is prolly there because engine and/or tranny is worn out...
I have a stage 1 AOD, in my 84 f150 that I'm looking to put a little more pep in her step. Y'all think dollin up my engine like this would blow my trans?
My question is about emissions. Living in California sucks. But having a 77 f150 w/302 I’m curious how much it will increase or decrease emissions. I have a federal vehicle so no cats or emission equipment needed. Just takes the sniffer test. I think that would be a good series. What mods can you make with out going to far and then can’t smog it
an intake and carb swap will probably make less pollution due to better fuel distribution in the runners and no fuel puddling like the low rise stocker. a modern cam profile can actually make less too. modern factory grinds are way more aggressive than old muscle car era grinds. you want a mild cam with no overlap. i'd recommend a comp xtreme 4x4 250H but with a set of isky flat tappet hydraulic lifters because comp's lifters aren't made the same way any more and iskys are. some tri-y headers with an xpipe with the same manifold and rockers as here and you'll be set.
@@rickycortez6733 with flat tappet cams and modern oils, make sure you use an oil with a zinc (zddp) additive. it's terrible for cats so they took it out over the years but it cuts down on friction from any non roller valvetrain. any zinc added full synthetic is gonna be fine.
@@anthonyrowland9072 sounds good. Thankfully this truck is a non-catalytic vehicle. I’ll buy that today to do a fresh oil change. Also I just bought a rebuilt carburetor so that should help
@@BuzzLOLOL the fact that the E7E heads stop flowing at 152cfm ( about 304 HP equivalent)means the cam could have hit a lot more with a set of performers ( 223 cfm )
I think I would have put pistons in for more compression, dressed the heads a little.. matched the ports.. these are labor intensive but on a budget, that’s cheap!
that's the difference between the bolt together hot rodder and the engine builder who realizes an engine is a system and everything can be "rubbed on" to play well together.
I got a 351 Windsor having trouble finding the distributor to go in it with the GT40 heads using a 97 Ford f250 fuel injected intake it was formerly a marine engine but the shaft that drives the oil pump is larger than the one out of the mustang that we're putting the motor in anybody I need suggestions on where to find a distributor for this engine
Wasn't horse power measured differently in 1970? Because in 1974 the same exact engine had 135 hp stock? His modern dyno im sure measures in the newer method, so the starting point would be about 135hp actual?
Starting in 72 they changed to net hp . That's all hooked up to all accessories in the car . Engines also lost some power with smog regulations, lower compression etc . 1970 was around peak power . Power really dropped off especially after 74 .
@@jackfishcampbell6745 Don't forget net ratings were also taken with the factory exhaust setup as well, the way they ran in THIS test is pretty much a gross HP rating setup.
to the beginning 30 some hp for 2500 bucks thats horrible you can do a 150 wet shot on that engine for half the price and still do an exhaust and upgraded fuel pump for the nos
Its amazing people actually make power with those stock heads, horrible ports. Then again, not everybody needs 600 na hp out of a small block. This would be a fun reliable set up.
I don't think a stock 302 block would hold 600 HP for very long anyway. Better step up to a 351 or get a good aftermarket 302 block for that kind of HP.
@@monibo7075 Fuel Injected Isn’t Finicky At Any Elevation. You Can Put Vehicle In Storage For Months& As Long As Battery Can Crank That Engine Starts Practically Every-Time. Try That With Carbs & You Won’t Start More Times Than Not. Adjusting Carbs All The Time Is Problematic After Sitting. Horsepower Performance Just Order A Guaranteed Crate Motor Putting Out 800-1200 Horsepower For $15,000-$25,000. Thats Reliable. Try Building. Boring. Honing. Balancing. Forged Internal Parts On & On & On To Other Parts That Make Up & Just Get It Tuned For Older Motor & Your Lucky To Get 625 HP Is Ridiculous. However To Each Their Own Because People Can Make A Hot-Rod Out Of Anything. (Car. Truck. Imports) Unless You Have Really Deep Pockets To Get 1,000-1,500 Out Of Older Motors Will Cost You Practically A Whole New Complete Car For $$55,000 & Smoke 💨 The Older Engines. Even NHRA Has Gone High Tech. Nature Of Time & The Beast.
More cam and rocker ratio on stock springs. If you yad used a 5.0 HO roller cam long block the cam price difference would have been offset by reused lifters and it already being a double roller chain. Rockers? There are some good 1.7 roller tips out there for reasonable price. JMO
On behalf of the Chevy Community and for my Ford buddies skip to 7:20
Thank you for that
Thank you
Thanks cheers from Canada 🍻
Will miss Joe may he rest in peace he was a great to watch gonna miss him
Had me in the first half with the clickbait. Now I’m waiting for the ls to get out the way to talk about the 302
Right. How is the SS supposed to be the high-po model with less than 400hp? No wonder they're gonna replace the camaro with a 4 door EV.
@@TheBigred1781 camaros died a horrible death after 69
@@joshjacobus4641 lol sure bud. They died in 76, When the firebird beat its ass. And came back till 2002. The new ones are bad ass. But would rather have had the Firebird, and GTO over it.
You mean the 455 with a whopping 200hp & 8 second 0-60 & 16 second 1/4 mile?
@@TheBigred1781 you must not know your cars...
That’s the fun area of performance, enough HP, torque without getting into too much trouble.
I'm curious to know what are the can spec's on the summit cam?
This has been so long ago all these parts are twice that price now.
That's good(sad) to know
And they've quadrupled in price with old uncle joe
@@gavincarroll2553 yeah i am looking at parts upgrades for a engine swap (do it now so i dont have to do it later).
@@gavincarroll2553 You don’t know how anything works lol.
@@aidanrace814 Inflation bud, you don't have to be a genius to know how that works.
One of the best engine builds I’ve watched from em
Loved what you did with the 302! I know you said a summit cam but what summit cam? Would like to do the same up grades but hard for o do when don’t say what cam it is and no cam specs at all . Love your show just now wish you would do a better job with part numbers and specs!
Have a great day and I am going to try this one! RIP Joe Elmore!🙏😢
Gday mates from Australia. Love your Engine videos as we have many of these engines here in Oz. Out of curiosity please, can you tell me the cam specs compared in the Ford 302 comparison. Very curious about the type of cam used to get that extra power. Cheers fellas.
God bless Joe Elmore and his family and friends!
I'm seriously digging the old school Holley 4010 carburetor. I always liked them and loved the throttle response with the annular discharge boosters.
That’s actually a summit carb. They bought the design from Holley when they discontinued them.
I know its an old video but do the pushrods look to short for this motor? Rocker arm rollers are barely on the valve stems.
What I learned from this video: Empty the oil before changing the cam so you don't have to waste fresh oil.
R.I.P JOE!!!
What was the specs on the camshaft?
God bless Richard holdner!!! This shits good for a nostalgic laugh, nothing else
Where did you find that long block for $1000?
Camshaft and rocker arm part numbers?
What are the second cam specs on the Ford 302 build? I went to the website (which is horrible to navigate) and couldn't find the specs or the build at all. Not easy to support your sponsors when you can't find what to buy.
crazy how technology has improved power. 300hp V8 seems like a joke when your running a 400hp V6 grocery getter
Where is there a 400 hp v6 grocery getter? Also, the number of cylinders has nothing to do directly with power lol. But yeah technology has made power numbers a little out of control. In reality, most people can't even drive a 96 Honda Civic to redline on anything but a straight line.
@@cefb8923 My Explorer ST is 400hp at the crank stock lol. torque even higher. 7 seat SUV thats pretty damn quick.
Had a 2010 s5 4.2L 6speed and a new base model a7 could keep up lol technology is definitely crazy in the cars being produced now :)
@@captaindrp82Your ST is turbo.
@@captaindrp82400hp in a 5000lb shitbox would get you smoked by the 300hp mild 302 in my mustang II thanks to the 470 million lb curb weight of your exploder. Power to weight ratio is where folks get embarrassed.
Wtf , we can't ever get a full ford episode from anyone, im starting to think the bow tie owns all car content.
Low Cost, Higher Power: Building A Ford 302 - Horsepower S14, E11 and we get Camaro upgrades ???????
Well, a Camaro is a Ford upgrade?
I'll take the blue oval over the bowtie any day
I caught that too Greg LOL
@@normanmadden hahaha thats just wrong lol! cuts deep.
Ford part starts at 7:15
My guess is the stage 2 intake would have made more power than the stage 1 after the cam swap.
That's what I was thinking as well.
Looks like several of us were disappointed because we didn't get a test with the new cam and the stage 2 intake.
Disconnect the positive before the negative? Is that a positive earth car? I was taught in trade school to remove the terminal that WON'T arc out on the frame first.
Which is why you disconnect the positive first. It’s not going to arc if it touches metal if it’s unhooked. The negative will though if you disconnect that first because the positive is still connected.
Man getting old sucks. Got a 351W out of a truck in 1994. Rebuilt with ported and polished stock heads I was into it for about 1,300-1500. I have old receipts for the machine shop, but they have faded. I remember it was so cheap back then lol 😆
The good old days. Even alloy heads were cheap then too
10:47 "separated intake runners" sounds like an air gap intake... but it's not... just 'divided plenum'...
Damn man, a year ago long blocks were $1k supposedly now they’re consistently $2k or higher
Just started the video but what block’s? middle Ga still around 1500 or 2k but 302 and 351 plentiful.. 460 or else are not so much plentiful 😂
2024 you can buy a reman short block for 990
Imagine paying 2200 dollars for 20 extra horsepower. What a world we live w
Those E7 heads are really holding power back on that 302.
The E7 is adequate until 4000ish RPM with most street friendly cams. For a summer cruiser with a stock automatic that's fine. This is a budget build and aluminum heads can cost over $1000 very easily.
@@ahoneyman
Or you go to the junkyard and pull GT40 heads of an explorer motor.
@@DBSSTEELER GT40 heads need special headers and anything from the junkyard needs a rebuild. If I'm going through all that I'll just spend a little more and go aluminum.
Yeah, most SBF heads puke out by 250 HP...
@@ahoneyman - Get junkyard engines from a low mileage wrecked vehicle... an unwrecked vehicle is prolly there because engine and/or tranny is worn out...
If the stage 2 manifold was to much for the stock cam why not keep the stage 2 manifold and swap the cam for the summit racing one.
I have a stage 1 AOD, in my 84 f150 that I'm looking to put a little more pep in her step. Y'all think dollin up my engine like this would blow my trans?
My question is about emissions. Living in California sucks. But having a 77 f150 w/302 I’m curious how much it will increase or decrease emissions. I have a federal vehicle so no cats or emission equipment needed. Just takes the sniffer test. I think that would be a good series. What mods can you make with out going to far and then can’t smog it
an intake and carb swap will probably make less pollution due to better fuel distribution in the runners and no fuel puddling like the low rise stocker. a modern cam profile can actually make less too. modern factory grinds are way more aggressive than old muscle car era grinds. you want a mild cam with no overlap. i'd recommend a comp xtreme 4x4 250H but with a set of isky flat tappet hydraulic lifters because comp's lifters aren't made the same way any more and iskys are. some tri-y headers with an xpipe with the same manifold and rockers as here and you'll be set.
@@anthonyrowland9072 thank you 🙏. That will be the next thing on my list.
@@rickycortez6733 with flat tappet cams and modern oils, make sure you use an oil with a zinc (zddp) additive. it's terrible for cats so they took it out over the years but it cuts down on friction from any non roller valvetrain. any zinc added full synthetic is gonna be fine.
@@anthonyrowland9072 sounds good. Thankfully this truck is a non-catalytic vehicle. I’ll buy that today to do a fresh oil change. Also I just bought a rebuilt carburetor so that should help
Should have put the stage 2 intake on after the recam for comparison.
Why wouldn't they do the stage 2 intake after they installed the bigger cam that was a dumb comparison
These show are hood at just enough info and thats it.
7:09 Ford content begins.
Thank you.
what were the specs for the second cam?
Prolly kinda big... like 230/230 durations at .050" lift...
@@BuzzLOLOL the fact that the E7E heads stop flowing at 152cfm ( about 304 HP equivalent)means the cam could have hit a lot more with a set of performers ( 223 cfm )
@@Selkirk69 - Oh sure... even with a $50 used pair of GT40P's...
The link to that camshaft is dead, what is the model number
no retest of stage 2 after camswap? uhhh.... huh?
probably wouldn't do much with the stock heads. Cam swap helped a bit but its so restricted at the heads.
Used to be able to get that stuff for way less, approximately half.
Nice video!
where you picking up a rebuilt 302 for a grand ???
There's as much easier way to prime. Assemble and disconnect the ignition coil wire. Then, simply crank the engine for a few....
210 HP 300 torque in 70? That’s crazy. My 84 foxbody 302HO is rated at 175 HP
Why do you never give cam profiles ,???
I think I would have put pistons in for more compression, dressed the heads a little.. matched the ports.. these are labor intensive but on a budget, that’s cheap!
Hot Rod claims they made 400 HP with a carbureted stock roller 5.0 with just a head swap.
that's the difference between the bolt together hot rodder and the engine builder who realizes an engine is a system and everything can be "rubbed on" to play well together.
Where do you get a rebuilt 302 for a $1,000
3-4 years ago you could from summit or jegs
You can still get a 302 long block from jegs for close to 2k now
From a close friend haha
Bob’s Midnight Auto Supply.
I wish he gave the summit part number for the cam. Anybody know?
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
7:20 is the start of the video
It's not pound feet 🐾 it never was and never will be 👍
The Dino pulling on 302 doesn’t help much if you don’t say the cam specs.
I got a 351 Windsor having trouble finding the distributor to go in it with the GT40 heads using a 97 Ford f250 fuel injected intake it was formerly a marine engine but the shaft that drives the oil pump is larger than the one out of the mustang that we're putting the motor in anybody I need suggestions on where to find a distributor for this engine
And what are the cam specs????
That reman 302 probably had lower compression pistons, and those iron heads don't flow. Best upgrade would be Dart or Trick Flow heads.
Why not use high compression pistons
Great way to spend money on a new vehicle that cost a lot! Adding 50hp to 400 with thousands is kinda dumb. Just my opinion
Ford part starts at 7:15
could you guys do a chevy express van build please.
Wasn't horse power measured differently in 1970? Because in 1974 the same exact engine had 135 hp stock? His modern dyno im sure measures in the newer method, so the starting point would be about 135hp actual?
Starting in 72 they changed to net hp . That's all hooked up to all accessories in the car . Engines also lost some power with smog regulations, lower compression etc . 1970 was around peak power . Power really dropped off especially after 74 .
@@jackfishcampbell6745 Don't forget net ratings were also taken with the factory exhaust setup as well, the way they ran in THIS test is pretty much a gross HP rating setup.
Wish they would go back to this type of build. They also need to evolve with the times. Not that many DD's even have V8s anymore.
Imagine if y’all sent me this engine for my 79 f100, a guy could dream
Nice work on that Camaro, and great job on that 302...
Every time you see one of these shows I feel like they edit most if not all the mfing things in place
Everyone bashing the cost, these videos was made over a decade ago. U comparing today prices , to prices back there.
Grand for a engine this days yeah right
How is this a low cost build?
I mean come on this is a 10k build. And half the parts were donated.
1hp per cubic inch "302"
"High Power" !!... ??
Can we see a 302 Cleveland since this is a Windsor
These guys should have done the cam upgrade first and then tested the intakes.
to the beginning 30 some hp for 2500 bucks thats horrible you can do a 150 wet shot on that engine for half the price and still do an exhaust and upgraded fuel pump for the nos
Tryt putting a Ford Motorsport E303 cam for once!
What went wrong ? You can’t tell a ford from a Chevy . If n you need a ford emblem let me know Lise do ya one ☝️
Its amazing people actually make power with those stock heads, horrible ports.
Then again, not everybody needs 600 na hp out of a small block. This would be a fun reliable set up.
I don't think a stock 302 block would hold 600 HP for very long anyway. Better step up to a 351 or get a good aftermarket 302 block for that kind of HP.
Yepper!
Best to remove the negative battery terminal first.
Take a 302 over any chevy
Mmmmmmm 351 is better way easier to make way more power
Superchargers seem to cost the most and do the least
Knowing the cam specs would've be helpful.
That's way too many steps for an oil priming tool. Just find the right sized deep socket and weld it to a long quarter inch drive extension.
1970- 220 hp? Out of what?
My 1973 302 out of a F-100 was rated at 120 hp (by Ford).
In 1970 Ford rated the 2bbl 302 at 220 hp . Sounds crazy but it's true !
If they gave you the specs they could be liable in court.
By the way separate the bow tie stuff. You’ve done this before.. don’t title it and then mislead
I thought this was about a 302 Ford.
Starts at 7:15...
@Frank Bonazza III - Chevy's make so much HP for so little money...
What cameo, chevy aleeady drop that line
Ford build at 7:21
gratz on the stock shelby power
Thought this was about a 302?
These gotta be old episodes
10 - 30 years old...
Rip joe
To Each Their Own However Older Engines Are To Expensive Complicated & Unreliable.
You Just don’t know how
@@monibo7075 Fuel Injected Isn’t Finicky At Any Elevation. You Can Put Vehicle In Storage For Months& As Long As Battery Can Crank That Engine Starts Practically Every-Time. Try That With Carbs & You Won’t Start More Times Than Not. Adjusting Carbs All The Time Is Problematic After Sitting. Horsepower Performance Just Order A Guaranteed Crate Motor Putting Out 800-1200 Horsepower For $15,000-$25,000. Thats Reliable. Try Building. Boring. Honing. Balancing. Forged Internal Parts On & On & On To Other Parts That Make Up & Just Get It Tuned For Older Motor & Your Lucky To Get 625 HP Is Ridiculous. However To Each Their Own Because People Can Make A Hot-Rod Out Of Anything. (Car. Truck. Imports) Unless You Have Really Deep Pockets To Get 1,000-1,500 Out Of Older Motors Will Cost You Practically A Whole New Complete Car For $$55,000 & Smoke 💨 The Older Engines. Even NHRA Has Gone High Tech. Nature Of Time & The Beast.
Or you could prime the oil pump with lithium grease
When I saw low cost high power, I just assumed they chevy swapped it..
That 302 costs about $8k- $10k in 2024...Sad.
If I wanted to waste my time watching a chev gm video I wouldn't
You forgot the oil pump drive lol
please add turkısh subtıtle , lot of people watch your videos have a nice day😀
B
Z
S
A
A
11:47 let it be known, they finally started to use PPE.
Ford part is at 7:15
Oh youre doing a 302 not a 5.0. Why?
More cam and rocker ratio on stock springs.
If you yad used a 5.0 HO roller cam long block the cam price difference would have been offset by reused lifters and it already being a double roller chain. Rockers? There are some good 1.7 roller tips out there for reasonable price.
JMO
Dont forget the zddp required for flat tappets at every oil change. $$$
Where's the 302? ... all I see is a GM ... Mislabeled video?