Unbelievable Value, Unrivaled Performance! Introducing the LGK 2.4!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- #audiophile #hifi #LGK
Buy Now! gr-research.co...
Introducing the LGK 2.4 audiophile speakers! These speakers deliver unbelievable value and unparalleled performance!
If you're in the market for high-quality audiophile speakers, then you need to check out the LGK 2.4. These speakers deliver top-notch sound quality at an unbeatable price point. Whether you're a music lover or a movie buff, the LGK 2.4 is a speakers you don't want to miss! - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![[TH] FS vs BME - VCT Ascension Pacific - Lower Bracket Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnygqsR2Fig/mqdefault.jpg)
This guy is a good salesman. He could sell you a GR upgrade kit for his own speakers, haha. -a fan
Man listen I made a blind decision here and now I have his NX-Treme the greatest speakers I’ve heard hands down
👍
We do offer various upgrades for our own speakers.
It's too bad some other manufacturers don't make upgrade kits for their speakers. Many can use it.
What exactly is a “small room” compared to “large room”? I think i have a medium size movie room and need new towers for surround sound
Small room is a bedroom. 10x10, 10x14, something like that. Medium is 15x15, 15x18, large I consider to be my personal living room, 20x22 with 11 foot ceilings and open to the kitchen and outside. When you sit 3+ meters from the speaker, you need more clean output. When you need to fill a large room, you need more clean output and wider dispersion. These, are not large room speakers, as they can't play super loud nor super clean at high volume, nor do they have a good dispersion characteristic due to the wideband drivers beaming. Small room, some toe in, should be fine. Big rooms require big output, it's just physics 🤷♂️
Hi Danny, what is the minimum rear wall distance recommended for these? Thanks!
The web site says 1 to 2 feet from the wall.
Hi Danny, how you only have 62k subscribers is beyond me! For anyone looking to purchase speakers, your channel is a must! Anyway, understand how actual work time pressures affect your ability to do videos, but you really should do some sort of recommendations / rankings on regular speakers.. Obviously theres more to a speakers sound than just crossovers and poly caps, however your commentary on the quality of the componants and "value" of the speakers goes beyond all of that and acts as a guide (i should think) that gives people a reason to pause before shelling out the big dollars on a shiny new set of speakers. Keep up he great work!
i think you did a good job designing these, looks impressive and do not cost a whole lot. you explained it clearly what they are made for and it all makes sense.
These sound like they are right up my alley, I only have two feet from the rear wall and my wife hates bassey and rear ported speakers. Any specific genre of music these excel in? Or good all rounder?
I recently built a pair of full range speakers with 4" drivers from Mark Audio and I agree that the sound stage width and depth is very impressive with them. Nothing for playing loud, but natural instruments, voices - wow!
I have measurements of one of their top drivers and photos of them side by side with our LGK's. If you like the Mark Audio drivers then you will really love our designs using the LGK's.
To The Big Boss Man: Rich you always do a spectacular job. Regarding the 4 woofer model would it be possible obtain it in an ported configuration ???? How much power can it handle??? Please advise, & THANK YOU.
TMP from N.J .😊😊
So $1476.00 plus shipping and you still have you build them, so really you would be comparing them to speakers at least two plus grand.
More like 5-7k if you account for real wood veneer, shipping of finished product & showroom dealer's commission😢
In the areas I mentioned them excelling, you can compare them to anything at any price point, and they will hold their own with speakers even in the six figure range. In imaging, layering, sound stage, and the vocal region, they really are that good.
Sorry. Why so expensive? 6 Chassis are160$. Crossover parts? No rez extra. Uninteresting for a european customer. Fright. Tax.👎🇩🇪🤔🤔
@@thomasschafer7268 Proprietor explained it well - for as little as that, you get unparalleled performance. Btw, please contact me, if you would like to trade in your Wilsons, Sonus Fabers, Magicos or Kef Metas.
@@thomasschafer7268 The cost of the kit is exactly what all of the drivers and parts cost. If you can cut your own cabinets this one is a bargain at only $651 for the pair.
I'm glad you emphasized using the LGK 2.4 in small rooms with its 86 dB/W/M efficiency and limited excursion. I want you to have satisfied customers.
The X-Max is not an issue though when passing everything from about 350Hz and down to a larger driver. They are still designed for specific applications and I do want my customers to understand what they are for.
@@dannyrichie9743 The 350 Hz crossover certainly increases the available dynamic range. I'll sometimes play music at 80 dB average levels and that still leaves plenty of headroom for peaks.
I used to be upset because my hearing tested well above 20khz. I could hear ultrasonic sensors. Now, it craps out around 13.5khz. So LOTS of speakers sound just great!
I do understand what you mean. When younger I could hear the oscillators on an analog TV (well we weren’t always in a digital age) when I sat close and the sound was turned down and now my hearing drops off just above 12kHz in my right ear and a bit higher in my left. I can now look at tweeter response graphs and vaguely remember when I used to hear pretty high up in the frequency spectrum. So now my speaker demands are a bit less particular than they used to be. It is what it is.
@@Aswaguespack I sat about 3 to 4 feet away from a jet turbine engine for almost two years. I used to have great hearing, now I wear hearing aids that I hate, and they still don't compare to natural hearing, and it is what it is...
@@gotchagoing4905 I was in music education for 33 years and à professional musician since my teens. Long term exposure to a high noise environment wore down my hearing plus the effects of aging as well and I have reached this point at age 70.
@@Aswaguespack Yeah, I'm in my 70's as well. But I'm grateful to still be listening to my music. I have over 600 cd's in my collection. Music for me, never gets old.
Protip is to do a a serious ear-cleanup with wax dissolvents baught from the pharmacy, and you will retain a couple of thousand hz of hearing when done.
You DO have better hearing than you think, just clean those ears out.
As someone with a small listening room I wish every speaker I have would naturally roll off high and fast. These designs make a lot of sense and a video explaining why avoiding a slow rolloff to achieve some deep bass is helpful might prevent some future criticism from people who wish every speaker was flat to 20hz.
I have a video in the works showing how I tune in room and for what reasons to tune certain ways. Your wish is in the process of being granted.
Cheers 🍻
i think what people really want is a flat sounding frequency response to their ears, and sometimes a speaker that measure flat will get room gains and get boomy. when you get access to full parametric equalization you find that out fast.
@@sudd3660 :
Most people don't want a flat frequency response on anything other than paper! But it is where all things should start. By the numbers!
Cheers 🍻
@@Finite-Tuning i think you misunderstood my point, measuring a speaker in room or not, is not the same as what you get if you eq a speaker to sound flat, they do not mix. and ears comes first.
and please do not comment on this before you try it, you probably will naturally create a dip at 3khz and a rising response 100hz and below. unless you have ported speakers.
@@sudd3660 Understanding with the proof and numbers to back it up, that is why I do what I do. Might I suggest you learn who you are taking to, before you begin to talk at!
Cheers 🍻
Direct /reflecting. Bose lives! Wonder if the patent applies...
Anderson Timothy Taylor Jeffrey Lee Kevin
Lopez Matthew Walker Robert Miller Angela
Miller Michael Martin Joseph Williams Kenneth
Thomas Eric Davis George Hall Jessica
I own encores how do these compare?
I have this question too.
Pros and cons to each and trade offs both ways.
Jackson Anna Moore Anthony Hernandez Scott
Another whoop butt speaker from GR Research! Not surprised at all Danny! When you have skills, things just come and these things will go. Should stir up many listeners needs. Great prices too!👍🏻
Johnson Anna Brown George Allen Thomas
So it’s ok to have a spike in the treble with your speakers but not with others
you should listen to the whole thing, it explains it.
Maybe the other companies have there reasons too??
@@jimberge5884 its in the video, do you really only reach with no thinking behind it?
Klipsch is one company that has a rise in the top end, and he has blasted them for it. This also has a hump up there in the upper frequencies, yet it's all good.. 🤔
@@Hiluxtaco There is a big difference in a tweeter playing 4db hotter than a woofer across the board, and a peak well above the treble and into the top octave harmonics. The wide band driver drops off faster in the off axis than a tweeter. So by 10 degrees off axis it is already pretty flat. If it were a wide dispersion dome tweeter this would be a different situation. I completely address this in the video as well.
Did Jay Lee hear these?
He heard the LGK 2.1's. He said he needed to get a pair of them for his desktop.
I love the look of these. Really is making me think. Just one question, Danny- have you considered, or would you consider doing something similar with the NX Studios? In other words, do an NX Studio with extra bass drivers in a sealed cabinet. This would be for guys like me with very little in terms of placement options, but who still want solid bass, and that fantastic NX soundstage.
We have actually worked that up and have a test box ready for testing. We dropped two of our M165/16 woofers in a sealed box right below it.
@@dannyrichie9743 Awesome, awesome, awesome! 👍👍👍 Best news I have had in a while. 😃
Hope if you can make a FAST speaker that's maybe little larger than bookshelf fullrnage 30hz to 20Khz
Keep an eye out for my next video.
The LGK 2.4 looks interesting. Are you bringing these to Lone Star Audio Fest?
We have not planned to exhibit right now.
This is what I was looking for ! A sealed speaker set for home theater ! From Gr it’s even better.
What do these do "better" than the NX-Tremes?
If you have a small untreated room then the NX-Tremes are not even a consideration. These little speakers excel in that application. They were designed for it. In our large room they come close to the NX-Tremes in the vocal area and in transparency, but they get crushed in every other way.
Interesting and very cool. I would really love to hear both speakers.
Curious to know if you have considered designing a hybrid speaker (powered woofers), especially for speakers with smaller woofers like this speaker. If not, I'd love to learn why.
Sure, we have two of them in development. I talk about them in this video: th-cam.com/video/w-ZzXaVq2TE/w-d-xo.html
What exactly is a "small room"?
You noted that toe for compensation of peek at high end is good. Creates more sound stage and at same time brings down that top end brightness. Other speakers you reviewed, would that also not apply as a means to , by toe direction come out flat and gain more stage presence ? Can you explain
With a typical dome tweeter you get wider dispersion. So if you have that much of a peak in the on axis it might not drop off until 30 degrees or more off axis, and that might be too much to tow them out. Towing them out that much or more might create too much side wall reflection in those areas.
Any plans for a horizonal version for center channel with identical driver count?
We developed a center channel version three months ago: gr-research.com/product/lgk-2-2-kit-single/ Identical driver count not necessary.
@@dannyrichie9743 would it be possible to custom order a modified flat pack to accommodate a horizontal LGK 2.4? Having the same sound coming from on front 3 channels is critical. The linked center is lacking rear firing driver and will lack the extra ambiance which is not ideal.
@@StevenP-cp9cu I am actually using the 2.2 model as my center channel right now. The sensitivities match perfectly to every other model in that series, and they sound exactly the same. I don't think I'd want an rear firing driver on the center though. A center channel is supposed to be a bit more directional as it has to anchor its output to the video screen.
Those speakers look great sir!
Another excellent offering, Danny! The rear tweeters are very good indeed. These look beautiful. Wonderful option for smaller rooms, which is my challenge also. Cheers!🙂
038 Clint Ford
7001 Kris Track
Which veneer is that on the speakers in the video? Maple?
This pair is in Maple.
old school 10" 3-way next pls
Done. We have been shipping out a lot of Brutes lately. gr-research.com/product/old-school-brute/
How about a stripped out review like you do with other Speaker Manufacturers ... That sounds about fair wouldn't you say Danny
How would these compare to something like the B&W CDM 9NT being used in a small home media room (11x13) for movies and music?
In the areas that I mentioned these are next level.
Cool design , but 18khz limit makes me think it could use super tweeter , maybe b&w style suspended above it for those harminics and air layering ...
What is the value of the high freq driver capacitor in this design ?
The range still extends to 20kHz. The rear firing driver puts those upper level harmonics in the room in such a way as to open up the sound stage further and create a 3 dimensional sound field.
@@dannyrichie9743 Thanks for explaining that aspect Danny.
I wish you had a showroom or a dealer displaying your designs so people could listen to them in say Central Florida , North East, MidWest and central West Coast .... Than those dealers/showrooms could accept orders so you could ship direct from your TX warehouse to customers.
Also maybe your presence in some audio shows like our close Tampa show would be a cool way .
It makes even more sense knowing how innovating and unique some of your designs are so it may present a gamble or risk for some potential buyers . Trying to help as a fan of your channel and products that I never had a chance to hear yet and TX trip is kind of far and away .
@@kdomster9141 A Texas trip might be a pretty long drive, but it can be well worth it. We can offer you higher levels of performance for less money, and hearing what we have will confirm it.
@@dannyrichie9743 I hear you Danny , got to plan it someday 😉
Give the art some QUALITY face time! No CHEESY 3 second side shots. The artist is very PASSIONATE about his craft. 😃❤️
great videos, thanks Danny! always interesting and entertaining for audio geeks!! great info!
Very impressive as usual Danny , what kind of power would you recomend for them ?
I'd recommend an amplifier that goes to 11.
@@HansDelbruck53 really , I would think nothing with anything lower than a 13 would not be sufficient.
By the way your a real fart smeller
I'd recommend at least 30 watts or more. They love the 120 watt Dodd Audio tube mono blocks.
Very interested in this speaker, Hopefully you could have a version for a bigger room.
Awesome freaking video and the best audio channel on TH-cam...💯
Hi Danny,
Which design of your has the highest directivity?
Looks like a fantastic value and I love the dipole with the wide range driver. That was a brilliant idea.
How would these work with something like the Elekit 300B tube amp?
I'd recommend a little more power than that unless you are using them 4 feet away.
Excluding the cabinet How much will it cost to build s DIY hi fi speaker, around 1000W RMS, with inbuild amp using only the high quality parts ?
That is a bit like asking how much for a new car. You can spend a little or a lot.
Awesome video and product Danny. Thanks. I was thinking that Encores (or some smaller closed back design) were going to be my solution - until I watched this...
In my very-small living room, with small couch seating against three of the walls, and an opening into a kitchen on the back wall, these would need to bookend the couch on the front wall and most of the time sit a foot from the wall (or less), and directly on the floor.
For such a compromised environment, could these potentially eek out some level of 3D soundstage experience, or be putting out just a wall of sound?
What are the drivers made out of? What is the x max? I didn't see what parts you were using on the crossover. Are they iron core inductors? I just don't think I saw the parts he was using. Why I wonder
See the LGK 2.0 driver on our site: gr-research.com/product/lgk-woofer/
The LGK driver uses all air core inductors, JB poly caps, and the Dayton Copper resistors. The lower woofer use an Super Q inductor and a poly cap.
@@dannyrichie9743 what about the inductors and what caps do I get for that price?
@@BostonMike68 The inductors are all from US coils using US made four 9's pure Copper. The JB caps are all poly caps. There are even a few .1uF JB by-pass caps. So good parts throughout.
@@dannyrichie9743 that's the full range driver. Ok I like it. I built something similar and it's cheapest speaker I put together and it's favorite. I put 45% corner pieces at the bottom and top for standing waves just for a tip . But I think those are pretty cool TBH I just learned to much from you on what to ask 😅
@@dannyrichie9743 you must crossed the woofers low if you used the fr I like the trick on the back. I ran mine series also I went back and forth I make the tops bottoms thick and heavy and it makes a big difference and I also did something different that makes it get down to 37 hz with 4" woofers without a port
Hi Danny. Can you explain subwoofer frequency. What is low ,punching bass and at what frequency it occurs, and low frequency we can’t hear but feel. Thanks for your help.
Sounds like a subject for a video.
The website only has the ‘tower’ version listed… starting @ $900.
You mention the bookshelf version @ $600 starting.
My guys failed to list it without the flat pack. It will be corrected shortly.
HI, I am new to this site and was wondering if you have done any research on electrostatic speakers for example Martin Logan speakers?
I have designed an upgrade for a few of them.
GR-Research has caught my attention.
Different topic
Ever GR upgrade or experiment w modern OHM speakers ?
Nope.
WAW indeed (woofer assisted widerange)
Volume almost max...hard to hear..
They look cool Danny but nothing compares to the NX-Treme sorry not sorry
That's true, but then I would never recommend our NX-Treme for a small untreated room.
Danny, what about a smaller one with only two base drivers per cabinet?
We have it: gr-research.com/product/lgk-2-2-kit-single/
Looking good.
Just ordered some cable. Cant wait to get it
The 2.4's look amazing and I am seriously impressed and surprised. I am goingvto seriously figure out how to get these. Thank you Danny!!!! lol...have you sent pairs to Ron B. to test out in his soon to be finished Room?
I will have him over for a listen soon.
Those look gorgeous. Might get the big ones for my room.
It’s a good idea to have a slightly hot top end with fullrange drivers. It helps balance the sound energy in the room against the narrow directivity.
Correct.
Hi Danny, I love your videos and I've learned quite a bit from them. I have a small 14x14 audio room with no treatment as yet and I would like your advice on which of your speakers you would recommend. I was looking at getting the NX Studios, stand mounted and paired with my Focal sub but the LG 2.4's look like they might possibly be a good fit as well. I would like to know which of these two speakers you would reccommend or do you think another of your speakers might work better?
Thanks..
Either of those speakers are good choices for your room. The NX Studio is a higher end model and twice the price.
@@dannyrichie9743 I was thinking the NX Studio would be best. How long roughly would it take for a completed pair to be delivered to Nova Scotia once I put the order in?
@@symbadawg Two to three weeks for assembly and a week in shipping.
Danny, you mentioned that these speakers aren’t for high SPL needs. My question is where are those specs. I remember on the LGK speakers there was a review that ripped them apart because they couldn’t go into the high 90s without breaking up. Your response was those speakers weren’t for loud listening needs. Is there anywhere you publish realistic SPLs for each of your speakers? It might be that it’s in the charts and I just don’t know how to read them properly? Thanks in advance.
The video you are referring to was of a guy that just had an axe to grind, and he took the LGK 2.0 (3" driver only with 1mm of X-Max) and just over drove it with a full range signal. Who would try to play a single 3" driver (not even a pair of speakers) into the 90 plus db range with a full range signal? They are designed for a desk top.
This version handled ever bit of the 120 watt, tube mono blocks could throw at them with zero issues.
@@dannyrichie9743 I totally agree with what you're saying and don't dispute that at all. My question was more general - like, how would I know what type of SPL's to expect from the various speakers? I know I've heard others say that the NXtremes have dynamic range to spare, but I would love to know the realistic levels associated with the various speakers - even if it was a side note in the descriptions or specifications? Also, I was curious if the charts that you put together have anything to do with the "limits" of a speakers range before breaking up? I think I just don't understand enough about the way speakers are measured - ie. are they measured at their limits?
Thanks again for all you do. Love the content and your passion for all of this!
@@AllenUnderwood Limits or power handling is never measured or tested by anyone. The LGK 2.4's are in a range to where when used as intended you'll be past the levels of normal listening before these speakers start to crap out on you.
What would you compare these speakers to ?
Tough question. There is really nothing out there like them that I know of.
Very interesting
Will there be a white / gloss finish 👀
You can build them from a DIY kit and make them any color that you want.
Are you going to do any sound clips?
We will.
598 Kenny Meadows
Cool 😍
55451 Deontae Spring
That is a nice artwork!
These look like really interesting and fun speakers! But looking at the website, I see the published frequency response for the tower 2.4 is 65-18kHz. Is this +/-3 dB? If so, I don't get why you would design a tower speaker with *4 woofers* that doesn't get full bass response without a sub. Make the bookshelves for use with a sub and the towers as a stand alone speakers. Grills would also be nice to keep the kiddos from touching things they shouldn't be.
Because, they were designed for small rooms. That is actually one of the biggest markets right now. So with the mains speakers not overloading the room, and lows dished off to subs with their own set of controls, it makes getting a balanced full range sound a lot easier to attain.
@@dannyrichie9743 Thank you for the reply. Why would those consumers not gravitate towards a high performance bookshelf speaker then? Maybe the -6 or -10 dB point on the tower is much lower?
@@terrywho22 This design has numerous advantages. The four woofers sharing the lower end means fast settling times. Also the front and rear LGK drivers provide a more transparent and 3 dimensional sound field even when placed close to a wall. It also has a more controlled directivity. So it is more room friendly. It also sounds incredible.
@@dannyrichie9743 But to get a full range sound, you still would need a sub (or two) which defeats a considerable amount of the benefit. If there is a market for towers that roll off bass quickly, glad you are helping those people out, but personally if I'm buying a tower, I want enough bass to omit the sub (for most music) thereby preserving time alignment and directionality (as you mention.) To each their own I suppose, and I know you know your market better than I do.
@@terrywho22 We've got models that don't require a sub: gr-research.com/product/old-school-brute/
However, full range towers can be disastrous in a small room and can overload them easily. Separating the lower range and giving the customer output level control over that range works great.
The LGK 2.4 offers performance for those smaller rooms that simply can't be beaten by a full range speaker. Full range speakers are larger and wider. That hurts transparency and sound stage layering.
Trade offs, trade offs... You have to consider your room as part of the system and build around it.
nice
Hey Danny, how do the lgk 2.4 compare to Tyler’s T2 ? TOWERS.
Apples and oranges.
@@dannyrichie9743 meaning?
@@michaelharness3258 The T2 is a more versatile 3 way speaker. It is good in all areas. You can use them in a number of applications and room sizes. The LGK 2.4 will best it slightly in transparency and in the vocal region. I'd give them an edge in imaging too. They will also work better in smaller untreated rooms. The T2's have about 5db higher sensitivity and will play louder and lower.
@@dannyrichie9743 thankyou.
I love my T2s I bought at your recommendation.
Excellent
I am curious how low you crossed the ambient driver? This design sounds incredible btw!
It uses a single capacitor, first order filter.
Hello folks. Rear firing tweeter has been around I would say back in the 70's.
Woofers usually we would burn the voice coil that's paper or they lasted longer then aluminum ones that just wrap from to much power and rub and made noise. Yes you can find that the volume can go up to magical 11 with paper v.c. aluminum cough.
Those burnt speakers make speakers stands as a teen on a no budget not low budget. So why not have fun so we ran them also back then speaker selecter switch A B and C on pre,-amp.
OP The tweeters is set up like a super tweeter so the cut off is high just play around with different size if caps. Remember it's about what you like sampling all of life's pleasure and not to have it choices for you. Idea start at 8hz or 12 go up by twos to 18hz. Then buy a nice cap. Try beaming them st8 up also. Because you'll never know until you tied this and that. Many things was invented by flute.
Upgrade mod
Oh have the tweeter for you can change the angle in setting and matching them up to room. Why because rear wall both corners are not the same. Linn style
Yes I'm still crazy
Ride Easy
@@BootJamesOut Thank you for your suggestions. Makes sense.
😀🤜🤛
1ST HERE, I get free speakers of my choice !!!d woohoooo
Are these 4" Woofers or bigger?
5 inchers.
@@dannyrichie9743 Thanks Danny. Would there be a problem if there are curtains in the back say about 2ft from the back driver?
@@leo11877 Not a problem.
Alex may have just ripped off Andy Warhol, or did Andy Warhol rip off other artists?
Oh but there are phase shifts even within a single driver due to a whizzer cone/phase plug design.
No whizzer cones here, and no phase shifts from the phase plug. There can be a little from the inductive reactance of the voice coil, but pretty small in this case.
LGK NXtremes next? Lmao
Will you ever do a video where we can hear the speakers? That would be helpful towards buying a pair.
We will be shooting some audio clips from this model shortly. We did shoot some audio clips for the 2.1 model that you can hear.
Rear speaker is an underused trick.
You look great with a beard
Great to see Danny, Well Done. I'm second here !
No mention of what there is inside, can we see the drivers, the crossover parts, the cabinet built, the knock test. Do we need an upgrade video on it to see those things?
You think I'd send anything out with cheesy parts? They are loaded with high quality parts. There will be a follow up on this one as well.
@@dannyrichie9743 Of course I expect nothing but excellent parts in those. What I like about your channel is that you go in depth into design. Great if you do a follow up.
@@lesarnolfinis6775 I will be doing a follow up.
Very nice looking speakers! I'm a fan of Definitive for their dipole approach and their built in subs. I think you made a great choice adding the rear speaker here. But I'm wondering about the spacing between the main driver and the woofers. I refuse to call that little thing full range! You already know why 😁. But did the measurements tell you that's where it belongs or was it done more for aesthetics? Also, I don't recall you mentioning, is this a 2 or 3 way on the tower? And too, are they all active drivers or do you have some passive radiators in the mix? Either way, they sure do look purdy and them numbers don't lie.
Cheers 🍻
He did, in fact, inform us that they are "two-way", he just didn't use that term.
He also did, in fact, inform us that all four of the woofers are "active", without using that term.
Watch it again, pay attention, and if you still don't come away with the answers to these two questions, I advise you to improve your knowledge of the subject.
@@Richies_Beer_n_Gear :
Advise all you like, but facts remain the same. If it's not industry standard terminology then we could be talking about literally anything! Perhaps you should improve your knowledge of "industry standard" terminology? But if I missed it, then well, my bad.
Cheers 🍻
@@Finite-Tuning Industry standard terminology?
Dude, he explained the driver compliment, the single crossover frequency and showed the graph.
That's all you need to know that it is a "two-way" loudspeaker.
Because the dipole wideband driver on the back has an HPF that the primary frontal one does not, you could, perhaps, technically call it a 2.5-way, but that's interminably debatable.
He also stated that the four woofers are wired in series (and what that means for the impedance and power handling), which, again, is all you need to know that they are all "active drivers" and not passive radiators.
What you call "industry standard terminology" is actually "industry standard" marketing lingo, not Engineering terminology or nomenclature.
@@Richies_Beer_n_Gear:
Dude, if I missed it then my bad, like I said! But you're making assumptions on words not spoken, and well, I don't do that! I listen and I respond accordingly. A cat is not a dog, and a thing is a thing or it's nothing at all. Cheers 🍻
@@Finite-Tuning Listen, dude, I'm not making assumptions, I am understanding what the man is saying and showing.
I am understanding the technical description and numerical data, from which I am drawing informed, factual conclusions.
I have a B. Eng. in Electronic Engineering, you clearly do not.
So just take the L, stop digging, accept that you have been publicly schooled by someone who knows far more about this stuff than you do and go back and read my first reply to you, which was intended to avoid the necessity of making a fool of you.
If you had understood that, then we wouldn't be here, with you prostrate on the internet as a mouthy ignoramus.
Isn't such a small midrange too small for 4 large bass speakers? infnity did this with a kappa speaker, with the result that the midrange was too weak.
The driver sizes are perfect.
People, would he ever tell you these were bad...? Can we get 3rd party measurements and objective reviews?
If they were bad then I wouldn't be releasing them. You will get a lot of third party feedback real soon.
The beard fits you!
Seems nice ánd an excellent deal, but... Funny how the uneven impedance is nót a problem with this / a speaker by your own design, while you criticized a (less) uneven impedance in another video of some Klipsch speaker. This kind of cherry-picking of arguments is kinda off-putting, nibbles at your credibility
There is a difference in having an un-even impedance and using it to control the low end.
So would a 20'x30' living room be too big for these? And if so... Do you sell any fully assembled speakers for the job? I'm seriously unsure about trying to wire one of these bad boys up. Soooo enjoying the videos. This LGK here has me interested for potentially replacing my Klipsch RF-82 II set.
We are listening to them in a pretty big room and getting great sound, quality wise. All those things I talked about are there in spades. Without the servo subs they would get a little swallowed up by the room though. When switching back to the Brute model we get a much more room filling sound with solid bottom end that digs deep. I think our Brute is better suited for the bigger room.
@@dannyrichie9743 Thanks Danny! Keep up the great work!
And my Magnepans?
We have upgraded a lot of them.
By using a fultone element, you get less problems with time delay between elements, but you get a less good treble.
A speaker where you have to sit in the middle and adjust the speaker exactly right to get good sound is not a good speaker. If you have a peak or coloring on a frequency, it must be removed with a crossover zobel circuit.
If you ask me, I wouldn't have had a speaker that colors at this frequency, which you have to adjust exactly right for it to play well.
My favorite is to use a tweeter that goes down to 1.5k example SEAS Exotic T35. and let it play quite far down in frequency while the bass/midrange does not go brighter than 1.5k.
then you get a speaker that plays wide.
It’s not that simple. You’re right that the treble isn’t as good from a fullrange, that’s why they invented tweeters. And you’re right that “sweet spot” speakers are stupid and a result of lazy engineering. But a peak at 10k isn’t colouration in my book. There are no instruments with fundamental frequencies that high. It’s only air or sparkle, it’s ambience, it’s not the tone of the instrument or singer. People naturally have a large variance in the way they perceive frequencies that high. There is no correct or flat response in that range because everyone will hear it differently including the musician and the mastering engineer. I see it as an advantage being able to toe the speaker to you’re liking. Of course, ideally you have a supertweeter with a level control. But these speakers are not at that level
@@KingOath 👍🏻🙂
The reason that a speaker should have as flat a sound response as possible is that it is not the speaker that creates the sound coloring but the sound source and the music.
Yes, we humans hear and perceive sound differently, but if a speaker has a lot of 10k, then you must not get used to it and think that this is how it should be.
Agree with you that
"Sweet spot" speakers are stupid and a result of lazy engineering.
We notched out the peak in the 2.0 desktop model. However, with a design like this the over all in room response is more accurate if the slight on axis peak up top is left alone.
We made some audio clips of the 2.1 model that you can compare to the original recording. Clearly the top end is great. th-cam.com/video/8w4MTWYSIW8/w-d-xo.html
@@dannyrichie9743
A little too many compromises in this speaker.
As another person wrote.
"Sweet spot" speakers are stupid and a result of lazy engineering.
I personally do not like "Sweet spot" speakers. You get this problem if you use a midrange as a treble.
@@ford1546 This speaker is the opposite of a "sweet spot" speaker. They have a very even response over a wide range and sound great from everywhere in the room.
This also isn't a midrange playing treble. This is a true wide band driver.
just play em !!!!