I'm lucky enough to own both OLED and Mini-LED displays, and I almost always prefer the brightness of a well-tuned Mini-LED HDR picture. I wish they would make glossy Mini-LEDS!
This is the best LCD I've ever seen. It's remarkable what Asus achieved with this. Colour accuracy, motion, brightness, shadow quality, blooming control are all fantastic. I'm extremely picky and I honestly would never buy another LCD ever again, but this one is special. You should compare it with a Panasonic OLED TV or a Sony OLED TV. I highly doubt this compares to any other LCD.
I have used the pg32uqx for two yrs recently changed to the pg32ucdm and I can’t be happier. It’s so much smoother there is zero white smear that’s the issue with the uqx is white smear and the bloom but the oled has zero of either yes it’s not as bright but it’s so much cleaner looking image.
@@stagm3 it’s fantastic to say the leased.set to 1000 nits it’s amazing. Line i said before the uqx is ok it’s just super old tech the panel is so slow it’s bad and has white smear. Look at some reviews of the uqx the panel is to slow and I notice white smear on like candles in d4 even or some other white items being displayed drives me crazy and the bloom is also a bad thing.
@@jasonmahrt9296ok thanks. I have the pg27uq and I love that monitor but I want something bigger and I’m deadlocked between the pg32uqx and the pg32ucdm
@@jasonmahrt9296I tried the pg32uqx annnnd umm yeah, was NOT impressed compared to my pg27uq. And the motion clarity or lack there of was definitely noticeable. Will be getting the oled !
@@DrakonR ADS-PRO (American company BOE ,its new technology surpass VA) 2X contrast ratio of ADS. 500hz screen refresh rate 😊 N 180 degree OLED Viewing angle . Full gloss . I M getting U8N(only 75” has ADS-pro. Rest are VA) or U9N (ADS-pro) this year .
I was genuinely surprised when I clicked to sub and found the sub count only 84. This channel deserves to be at least over 100k subs. I’m sure it’ll get there given the quality. Very nicely made video.
Thanks I really appreciate that. I'm new and just figuring things out but hopefully I can get a hold of more monitors and a better recording setup and make more comparisons that people want to see.
This is what I was saying since months and that I recently confirmed by buying the new MSI 240Hz OLED for comparison with my Acer X32 miniled. I prefer the X32 miniled hands down.
Even with the budget for a 1000€ OLED, I decided to buy a cheap miniLED monitor, the KOORUI GN10. I really recommend it to everyone, it's HDR 1000 and VA, you'll have deep blacks and nice highlights. It goes perfectly with my PS5.
Thanks, I snagged one before the sale ended. If you don't mind me asking what setup do you run? I would have a fairly beefy pc hooked up to this as well as an xbox series x plus a PS5. Do you use any other displays in conjunction with this one? I plan on pairing it with a PG27AQN or maybe even a PG27AQNR when it releases at some point in the future for more competitive games.
The thing is the HDR1000 mode shouldn't ever be used. It dims so much that the PQ EOTF tracking almost always undertracks, unless it's a dim scene. HDR 400 is far more accurate, and looks better in I'd say over 90% of the scenes.
Solid video as ima make a few points 1. OLEDS in general are dimmer which you miss out alot of the brightness and as i watched the video in some areas the detail looks a tad bit cleaner but the brightness loss / OLED dim is to huge. I had a LG CX before and i use to look at it kinda sideways as it was dim as well. The contrast is there for sure but with that you lose it with how dim the panel is so its a + and - effect 2. You compared a 1,900$ Mini led to a 1,299 QD-OLED. I think this would been more apples to apples if you would of did the QD-OLED vs Samsung neo G7/G8. Alot of people not spending 2k on a monitor as well so this would of been in the ball park and a fair comparison 3. The content when playing games was being done on PC or console with HDR ON or OFF? Other then that, Prob one of the best videos to show the difference between a QD-OLED and MINI LED. Mini LED is much richer and brighter and you dont lose much its like 95% of the oled and you dont have to worry about burn in / Dimming and Auto Static Brightness Limiter
Thanks, I appreciate it. This video wasn't really intended to be apples to apples, its to demonstrate the potential of mini-led and that it still has a place in todays market where there is an OLED frenzy. It's also to show that OLED still has a long way to go in my opinion before it really shines in HDR. Of course for most, these OLED's are awesome monitors, I just tend to scrutinize far more than the average joe. This was all done on PC, just no where near enough flexibility on console. Also like I said, I had to reduce the PG32UQX's brightness because it gets so bright (1700nits from 1-50% window) that it makes the OLED look like I have it at 10% brightness. EDIT: I'm in the process of getting a hold of a Neo G8 to compare to both the PG32UQX and G8 OLED.
@@SolaceinScrutinyI’m glad you do scrutinise like you do, because I wanted to get that exact OLED monitor, but after seeing how dim it is, I’m either going to wait for OLED to improve or get a 240hz Mini-LED
@@cameron2319 wise choice. Oled is extremely dim so on 1 hand you get the contrast but on the other it’s dim so it’s a + - effect which is what had to let go a lg cx. It’s had the contrast but the dimming was off
@@cameron2319either Hisense (Google Os) U8N or TCL QM851 now 144hz-4K PC with AMD/Nvdia . (MediaTek Pentonic700 chip) Or next yr 156Hz (MediaTek Pentonic800) 😊 U8N already 1.5X contrast of SONY flagship X95L. 7 X contrast of X90L . Color volume Match S95C surpass s95B. Much better Visual than LG G3 G4 (bright n low Color density/volume , tinty ) U9N hasn’t released yet . Lol 😊
Problem with Mini Led FALD is, Vrr dont wor with Local dimming, so you lose nearly every FALD contrast. Also TFT Central tested and every Mini Led FALD backlight is flickering High Freq, wich can cause Headache.
Why haven't I heard any of this from anyone else? Have I just missed all those videos? I've seen like a hundred reviews over the past six months or so all raving about how great OLED is. Were they all lying?
OLED is great, just not the handicapped desktop monitor versions we currently have available to us. Also, I wouldn't say they're lying, they are just incentivized to say mostly great things about OLED since they are provided the products for review. These are just my own opinions in the video, others of course feel differently.
Yes! My Samsung s90C TV is very bright, but my ultrawide monitor g8 oled gets dark and changes brightness all the time. I used to have an asus pg27uq and I still miss it, it was just so beautiful
Yes, OLED has tons of fanboys that refuse to acknowledge any flaws of the technology. That combined with people who've only ever used shitty office monitors up until their shiny new toy makes up the vast majority of those takes. At the end of the day it depends on your use case, neither is objectively better than the other.
@@anitaremenarova6662 and LG WOLED has banding pretty bad. I still don’t understand all the hype for the C1, I never loved mine, I sold it after 2 years and got the s90C
All the OLED hype online pushed me to buy an LG C2 last year and while it is a huge upgrade over my 1440p LCD monitor from 2018, I really do regret buying it after over a year of using it so far. I know now that if I would've waited out a bit longer or did more research at that time, I would've ended up getting a QD-OLED or a high-end mini led TV and been much happier. Not like I had to break the bank or anything to get the C2 but I definitely should've done more research instead of buying into the hype from the massive online LG fanbase. The C2's mirror-like coating and starfield-like scenes in HDR were the only things that really wow'd my friends and family, but outside of that it didn't look that impressive at all especially for anime and sports which is what we mostly watch.
😢this hurts me to see ppl like I got tricked to get C2 or A95J n C3 A80L , B3 A75L etc n paying 3X price . N stress about burn in . Ppl like u r the reason I started to upload tv videos last yr . 😮 C2 was not cheap at time ! 😮
yea its bullshit. The c series has been trash ever since the cx imo, besides c4, which is still a woled. qd-oled is simply superior to woled. Grab an s95b if you ever see a good deal and unlock its brightness in the service menu to 1500 nits. It looks so fucking good
@@crowntotheundergroud 100% agree. I think u mean S90C? S95B were prob long gone now hard to find. The S90C prob plenty if hunt around. Bit too dim for me tho as it is the Same brightness as that Samsung Odyssey. But in Canada n EU they have S92C which is sweet spot for pricing, for 1300nits without paying S95C price. Samsung is skechy tho, anyone buy Samsung TV needs to--NOT ever connect to Internet. They will FORCE update even it has set to “disable auto update”. N tv will slow down, n gets dimmer each time. Needs to get external streaming device . Mini LED or QD-OLED from Samsung can not escape it. I wonder if they do that to the --PC screen now, shit i never thought of that. I guess the screen doesn’t need update, its a plug in n play type of thing. The Tv is like a PC on its own.
@@Yoga_Tv_buying u can unlock the brightness on the s90c as well using the same service menu adjustments. U won’t be able to do regular updates, which to me isn’t a big deal at all really. Oh okay u get it. I just read the rest of ur comment lol. Yea Samsung is awful nerfing the brightness of the s95b 30% among other things. I just use my pc to stream. I think the problem is when the prompt pops up asking either to “update now” or “update later” people think “update later” means “do not update for now” essentially, as they should, but it really means the update is just going to occur later on and u will not get the same notification.
No problem. I think OLED is a great step up from your average IPS/VA budget gaming monitor and has a place but its being put on a pedestal by most reviewers without really considering its short comings.
@@verttisyrjala2897Response time compared to good LCD panels is inconceivable by the naked eye. While you're correct on motion clarity that only applies to high refresh rate, for any singleplayer game below 120fps an LCD with strobing will provide better results.
So glad to see a video saying what I've been expressing to everyone since the "Hype" of OLED's in the monitor space. I rock a PG32UQX and before that had the Asus 27 PG27UQ (It's older brother)... nothing touches a super high end mini led for HDR like these types of monitors. It's not even close. And the PG32UQX had near OLED blacks due its increased zone count over the older brother. THE only way OLED can compete with these high end Mini-LED monitors is for some companies to copy what Apple just came out a week ago with their "Tadem-OLED" (Basically Stacked OLED) and that's not even feasible for a gaming display, as the overhead of the GPU needing to run this stacked kind of display in perfect sync with each other would likely bring issues for VRR technologies and bandwidth/latency issues. It's sad that the entire industry is focusing on OLED's (Probably bc they are cheaper to produce) opposed to offering even more high end mini-led monitor options.
The PG32UQX ansi contrast ratio isn't all that great but actual content isn't checkboard pattern outside of like star fields so real world contrast is pretty good. Good enough that I also don't think the perceived difference is that big. Like I said in the video, its a marginal improvement while the difference in colors and brightness is a far more significant which is why I accept the PG32UQX's bloom as a trade off. The monitors biggest weakness is pixel response (especially white/light colors). If they would release a 5000+ zone successor with a faster panel and bumped the refresh rate to like 160 or 180hz, I don't think I'd need anything else until micro led comes to the PC monitor space. I think we are a few GPU generations away from 4K/240 being achievable especially with so many future games being UE5 titles which I can't even break 70-90FPS in with a 4090 right now. Of course this doesn't apply to older titles or esports stuff but like I mentioned, I buy a high quality display to play games with high quality graphics.
Actually qd oled does use stacked layers. There are 3 layers of the blue emitter and many believe there is a green pholed layer as well. Its practically the same approach.
I can't believe it's been 3 years since I bought my mini led TV which is 1800 nits and there are still almost no options in the monitor market that are similar. All we get is the same e-waste 200 nit oled panel announced from every manufacturer every year. The motion improvement is not worth the other drawbacks of oled. After 7 months of research and returning a g9 I finally settled on the TCL 34R83Q, getting it next week, hope it's good enough. Should be around the same HDR performance as this Asus, if the backlight is as fast. The TCL is still smaller and lower res than what I would want, but the monitor market is so bad and it's impossible to follow product cycles like with TVs. All you know is "maybe" something might come out in a couple of years and then it gets cancelled...
❤❤ same here . I had $5000 SHARP - made in Japan . LED TVs . N the WOLED since the W means white light constantly blended in RGB to boost “brightness” (or lack of ) , not only they r Dim , also Low color on d dark grey . Just flat ! 😮 The TV market has flipped upside down too. Hisense U8N , TCL Q851 looks better than LG G4 , since they r bright n with Color Density/Volume Match with QD-OLED. 😮 it piss a lot of ppl off becusee they buy WOLED 😮to feel pristege , now LED look so much better . Lots ppl in denial 😮. My U8G 2021 65” makes my 2023 -$1100 iPad-Pro with M2 Chip look like $300 junk 😮 . Its insane
One thing nobody seems to comment on is Samsung's inability to display orange correctly, its comes off as a pinkish red like at 6:17. I have both a QLED and an LG OLED and the issue is clear as day when comparing those too.
Gaming on mini led turned out to be far better than I thought, it really pulls you into the scene giving an immersive quality no other screens give. Any lighting effects it totally brings it alive in a game, the sun, special effects, street lights, or even just watching sdr content like star wars a light saber actually glows like crazy it's the coolest thing ever. For me the spot dynamic lighting effect alone is the biggest selling point it's just so cool and should be seen as a whole other attribute or technology. I keep hearing people not define it as such but just a brighter screen for better hdr, when in reality the spot lighting even on just sdr content is more of a selling point than better hdr since most things are sdr.
Great Video. I recently sold my PG32UQX for the new PG32UCDM OLED display. While there are some things I do miss about it, the PG32UCDM is better in almost every way. Motion Clarity, 240hz refresh rate, 1000 nits peak is actually pretty bright when you have zero blooming and an amazing contrast in dark scenes. Full screen brightness, especially in daytime scenes is where the PG32UQX really shines and blows OLED out of the water.
This is what I've been saying for years. OLED is awesome, but the brightness is worlds different. The brightest OLEDs only really get to 500-700 nits in a real game scene, thanks to ABL curves (LCDs also have ABL curves but they're far less aggressive). I have an OLED phone that does 1600 nits of brightness sustained across the whole screen, which is 400 nits brighter than my PG32UQX can sustain across the whole screen! And while it looks amazing, the simple truth is I can't game on that phone, and OLED TVs/monitors can only do 200 nits fullscreen. The tech just isn't the perfect thing everyone always claims, and it's so frustrating hearing everyone talk about how incredible the barely HDR picture of an OLED is, whilst simultaneously dunking on competing tech that's just as flawed but better looking. We really need MicroLED to just kill both sides so we can move on past this dumb debate and appreciate real HDR together. Edit: 7:43 For what it's worth, I have a PG259QN (1st gen 360hz IPS with mediocre response times for the given refresh rate) and I greatly prefer my PG32UQX at 120hz even in competitive titles where I DO get 360hz, purely for the HDR picture. The brightness and color just reveal targets so easily and keep enemies visible even in pixel response blur. Edit: 9:52 Asus and other Mini-LED manufacturers source their panels from AU Optronics, so we're waiting for them to make better panels. And Samsung doesn't know how to make something with adequate cooling so their Mini-LEDs have TONS of ABL, oh and they completely lied about the peak brightness of their Mini-LED displays... 2000 nits? Try 1200 peak 10% and 400 sustained 100%. Compared to the PG32UQX which does 1600 sustained 10% and 1200 sustained 100%. Final Edit: Oh yeah, and companies like Hisense have managed to get much better zone density, like 3x that of the PG32UQX, as well as 10,000 nits peak brightness in some of the newer stuff. So these advancements will trickle down. I'd expect gen 3 Mini-LED to have 3000 nits of brightness, and 2000+ zones at the high end. AUO are making a 4608 zone 32 inch panel this year.
@@edragyz8596 I dunno, it seems like the monitors with good specs and reasonable price are always "a year away". For example the Acer X32Q FS got some announcement press in mid/late 2023 but now 6+ months later it still can't be bought in Americas (at least not that I've seen. People in China/Taiwan and maybe Australia can get them?) I guess one positive is the PG32UQX is selling around 1800USD now instead of 3000.
My desk monitor is a QN90C Samsung Miniled tv. While it has black smearing and viewing angles aren't ideal while sitting close to it. It's advantage is that it can play HDR content throughout the whole day vs My A80j OLED who outshines it at night as a bed TV. Honestly I'm excited that Sony has decided to make their flagships Miniled instead. I'd love for them to release a 43 inch or other monitors. Their color accuracy, sharpness upscaling, and motion are just a step above the other brands. Well worth the premium. Miniled is coming!
Great comparison. Wish you recorded in stereo, my left ear enjoyed the review 😂 The PG32UQX is a great monitor but for how old it is, I'm surprised that its still so expensive with no price drops. It costs double of the QDOLEDs where I live.
@@anitaremenarova6662 i was thinking about Acer Nitro XV275KP3 4k mini led Monitor for 500€ used, but like i said i can get the pg27uq for 300€ and i got another offer for a acer predator x27 with silent fan mode for 400€, hard decision :=) !! which one would you pick
i have a PG32UQX, LG C2 42", 55" S95D, 85" QN900C, a Viewsonic 15.6 4k OLED portable monitor, and the PG32UQX destroys the OLEDs when it comes to HDR contents even the S95D. When the sun rises, it blinds my eyes, when playing God of War, it is breathtaking!! I can see all of details of the armors in God of War, the metals parts of the armors and axe look very shinny and bright while all they look dull on the OLEDs. One of the games where the OLEDs shine is Lies of P where the environments in the games are generally on the darker side. Even when viewing SDR, the Asus looks better than the OLEDs since it can go much brighter. Some people say a good monitor/tv is not about brightness, but it is when it comes to HDR. When the specular highlights in a video/movie is meant to be seen at 1000nit, your monitor needs to reach 1000nit for you to see them. Same goes with 1550 nit. 2000 nit...etc. OLED displays provide infinite contrast, but it doesn't mean it can provide the HDR impact such as a sun is rising up along the horizon. HDR impact makes you feel like you are there in the scene. On the other hand, OLED displays do much better than mini led when viewing a scene where we see a lot of buildings in the city at night from a drone view, which mini led tv/monitor struggle to display a clear image which the micro contrast on an OLED really shines. I understand the strengths and weaknesses of both technology and that's why I decided to own both. There is no need to argue which is better, get what works for you.
What 😮😮😮🎉 u have S95D ? Qn900C ? Damn those r amazing TVs i have seen them in person !!! I absolutely agree with you! My entire family think Mini LEDs r higher end that OLED . It’s the combo of Brightness , on top the Thick dense color volume casted on the brightness makes it 3D ! Mini LED has the more bright morning clean visual . Also Dude … u should check out 2024 UX , U9N U8N . Those r d BEST LEDs out there . The ADS-Pro . On digital trends latest video.
Angielski Compared to the Asus, the Samsung looks slightly faded, as if the contrast was reduced, while the Asus looks like a TV in a supermarket, as if it had all the settings at max. That's why the difference in color perception can be so big. In Asus, burnouts and the resulting lack of details are often visible. It's a hard choice to make. The Asus is much more expensive, it looks better, but we don't usually use two monitors, so the difference may not be visible when using the Samsung, the image of which is undeniably phenomenal on its own. A big advantage of Asus is the durability of the Mini LED matrix, which theoretically is not as susceptible to burn-in as Samsung's QD OLED. If someone also uses a monitor for work, where static elements are displayed a lot of the time, the Asus may be an ideal solution for gaming and work. For a higher price, we have comparable or even better image parameters and, in addition, theoretically a much longer life of the Mini LED matrix, although these new OLED matrices are supposedly more and more durable, but they are probably not as good as the Mini LED matrix yet. It's a bit of a shame to buy a QD OLED monitor for a lot of money and then replace it with a new one after a few years or have it burn out. What do you think, am I right, or did I miss something?
Cancelled my G80SD because of this, I've owned OLEDs before but I got caught up in the hype again. The dimness, VRR, and stutter at low frame rates is unbearable on console.
@@stagm3 idrk what to buy anymore.if im going oled ill def buy the g80sd but idk i feel like that much of a price just for oled is a bit much,you can get the same specs but on ips,just not sure if oled is really worth that much and im also scared of burn in
@@fredinhoZ burn in is always a possibility with OLED, always have to consider that idc what people say but with the 3 year protection at least there’s some peace of mind, I enjoyed the asus pg32ucdm for the most part, the hdr was just not up to snuff compared to my pg27uq
@@stagm3 thats the thing i still dont know if theres warranty with the g80sd,if i do decide to not get oled ill prolly go for the g70b, same specs but ips and a bit lower hz but im on console so it doesn’t effect me
I have the ViewSonic XG321UG which is basically the same monitor as the PG32UQX as it uses exact the same panel from AU Optronics and I agree with your observations. Which local dimming setting do you use in HDR? I use the balanced one, where small highlights are a bit brighter and transition of the zones is less aggressive. In SDR I can use the faster setting.
I think there is a difference between the two when it comes to local dimming. The newer revisions of the PG32UQX it makes no sense to use anything but the level 3 or fastest setting which behaves some where between the XG321UG's balanced and fastest setting.
i was using the pg32uqx but i upgraded to a samsung 8k qn700b. i do hope we get more miniled offerings, otherwise i fear we will have to wait 10 years or more for microled to become available.
Yeah TV environment can be very different from a monitor. Many can't control the light in a living area where a TV is placed so the extra brightness helps to offset the ambient light.
I couldnt agree more. I bought the corsair flex oled and was shocked at how bad it was for most of my needs. Maybe for gaming and media consumption of dark scenes its great but overall its not good. I "upgraded" to a $400 no brand hdr1000 mini led and I love it so much more.
My two cents regarding OLED (used to have one): 1440p resolution at 27 inches is not enough, especially for office work and even regular internet surfing. I was one of those people who thought it was possible to do productive work on it, but the pixel structure and low PPI made themselves felt. I felt nausea, like something in my eye, and it took a week to get used to it with app help called "Mac Type" you can mitigate the effect Color fringing, the VRR flicker happens to me much more often than I would prefer, and it also distracts me. I'm trying to adapt to this
They both have their benefits in drawbacks. Realistically, you can compare them side by side. Mini-LED is brighter and will affect how the OLED looks with how the camera and your eyes adjust. A mini-LED will perform better in a dark room. An OLED will have better contrast and deeper blacks that will allow for better dark content in the future. Apple's new iPad Pro OLED screen makes the old pro look blue. OLED is also better for your eyes. Most of the issues that have been pointed out about the Samsung seem to be software related and not the panel. These can be fixed by firmware updates. OLED has also has more potential.
Hey I have the ipad-pro with M2 chip . I know exactly the weird dim look that ipad has. My LED QLED TV makes my $1100 Ipad pro looks like $300 dog shi. When side by side Weirdest thing. Ipad mini LED must used the Same technology as SONY. ---🟦 light coming from Back as BASE light, mix with h🟩🟥 at front to ---CREATe ⬜️white. it does NOT have real normal white. all their whites are always s👕(for SONY for decade) now👚. ALL SONY TVs are always severly pestle due to STrong Blue base light that u can NOT calibrate out of it even tho the RURUS will promote” accurate color(film)” bs. at 2010-2011 the Global LED TVs were 100% produced by SHARP Tv in Japan. All SONY were SHARP with SONY Logo. in 2015 Hisense bougth SHARP TV brand then Toshiba. SO Samsung n Hisense r the 2 TV displays with Best LED technology n patterns other screen manufactures cant touch. they have white ⬜️ coming from Back , meet --🟥🟩🟦 at Front to creat most vibran t🟥🟩🟫🟪🟨🟧. when the rest of SONY n most of LED displays use that Blue🟦light as base light which Significantly degrades image level. but MORE Premium LED existed all this time. Ppl Assume SONY n Apple best so if things dont look that good, they think its LED issues. The Mini LEDs TVS this year U8N , QM851 are insane stunning . They can do 144hz -4k gamming with AMD/Nvdia. WOLED--due to having ⬜️ 🟩🟦🟥 at all time, they have 1/3 Color DENSITY of LED. Because the Strong WHITE light MIX (instead of LED will TRANSFORM into color) WOLED MIX with color , n dilutes the light like no joke. they HIGHLY relying being DIM to boost Black blocks to creat aritficial IMPRESSION of high contrast. . MOST images are SEEN by COLOR/Highlight . a Spring morning day will 100% be more plesant eye than Cloudy day or in shadow behind tall building. in Dim visual, takes BRAIN longer to register What is What. so actually--DRASTICALLY slow down in BRAIN processing image can cause visual blur n slow down in judgement (from brain , what is hidden enemy or some aritfact) , which negates the whole reason buying fastest refreshrate or pc processing. --thats said by science professor debunking OLED/Plasma. since OLED so dim/ low in color even with black on some trims, most image looks grey , dim dull in shadow, lots visual blur. that OLED “best” is confirmation bias not at anyone’s fault but its getting de bunked now by premium Leds. American company BOE just invented MORE premium LED screen called ADS-PRO. 180 degree viewing angle, full Gloss, 600hz screen refresh rate. 2X contrast ratio of typical ADS. I have seen it, its INSANE. they are putting in U9N UX , n 75” U8N U7N (TVS, gamming tvs). Samsung had it last year but they are Suing BOE this year so they dont get those premium Screens anymore. 😊
Its kind of a shame how the manufacturers limit the monitors when QD oled TVs can get alot brighter. The 10 percent window performance is very important for hdr gaming
4:54 Flicker is due to PWM. Well, it's caused because the way VRR works on OLED is by recalculating the brightness from the previous frame, it's not the same as LCD. Most modern LCD displays use DC for brightness dimming, I say most because even LCD panels can use PWM. LTT did a video on the ROG Zephyrus G14/G16 that explains it, where in the process of getting a lower power VRR solution they kinda elegantly solve VRR flicker at the same time.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Oh I don't disagree, I'm just adding onto the conversation with information. Another piece of information is that some phone manufacturers advertise flicker free eye care by ramping up the OLED display PWM (some 400 and others 1,000+) so throughout the brightness range flicker becomes imperceptible.
Situation in EU is horrible. We can either choose Samsung Odyssey Neo G7, Neo G8 or Neo G9, or choose a 576 local dimming zones 4K monitor that costs as much or more than the Neo G7 and G8, more than a 1440p OLED. Granted it's 4K at least at 27 inch with good PPI. What 576 zones mini-LED would you recommend the most? Have you tested them? It's impossible to get 1152 zones IPS miniLED with true HDR 1000+ here, which is what I would've liked. I had tried the Acer XV275K P3 but it's local dimming solution is horrible. It's bright for sure but in the majority of scenes the blooming is readily visible and very intense.
Innocn 27M2V is not available in EU? I can't recommend any of the 576 zone monitors available today. They are all plagued with poor local dimming algorithms and I don't personally think the zone count is acceptable now a days. I actually think the 384 zone PG27UQ and X27 from almost 6 years ago perform better than these new 576 zone monitors. There is the Asus PG32UQXR but I haven't tested it myself. I'm interested in getting one in the future to test but I've only heard bad things about the overdrive tuning.
@@SolaceinScrutiny thats what i expected, pg27uq + acer predator x27 will work better than new mini led monitors, cause of the gsync-ultimate modul, which helps with the dimming algorithm.
Yeah its a regression from its 3 year old predecessor in every way other than pixel response. I personally don't understand why it exists to be honest. It's MSRP is $1299 but should be like $899 or less.
@@SolaceinScrutiny y they just abuse the name to make money with the pg32uqrx, crazy enough is alot of ppl think the pg32uqrx is better, but in reality its worse :O
Hi, based on this video, do you have any experience with the Philips Evnia 32M2N6800M ? It's a similar monitor as the PG32UQX but I can't find any good reviews yet.
Got an OLED TV but sometimes I dislike the image, a lot. Like many bright daytime scenes never seem to look like... bright daytime. That bums the hell out of me. Then sometimes it looks spectacular, like something I've never seen before. The other option was a VA-panel TV with a viewing angle of like 10 degrees :D I love my VA monitor, but on a TV the viewing angle seems to matter a lot more. I tried a 1500€ Sony one, and the amount of disbelief I was processing when I noticed the problem, was actually funny in hindsight :D In conclusion - OLED is the only TV tech that is currently a viable option. Monitors - just stay clear of Samsung lol
Like Hisense U8N/ U7N, then U8K/ U7K. Then the U9N (about to launch this year in 75” 85”) then the UX 98” 110”. --ADS-PRO panel. U8K , U7K It has MediaTek Pentonic700 Chip. That can do 144hz Full 4k Pc gamming with AMD/Nvdia. (Only tv could do that in 2023) . Also Samsung Flagship Q90C has ADS-PRO panel. They all have very advanced ADS-PRO Screen. -180 Degree viewing angle. -2X contrast ratio of Typical ADS. screens. -N 600hz screen refresh rate. When ADS /IPS has low contrast, n 144hz cap screen refresh rate. -because it does not require anti Glare layer. It does NOT have the 🌈 smear on that X93L, X95L, Bravia9 . Nor it has the wide angle matting layer that x90L or Bravia7 have. They look like Star ⭐️ Trek portal. Next year MediaTek are launching Pentonic800 Chip that can do 156hz PC gamming. So those with ADS-PRO will be crazy :) but yes prob in larger screen prob too big for tv monitor lol 😂
The problem with the misconception of HDR is that many Internet users are mostly dirt poor. They cannot afford high-end monitors like the true HDR monitor PG32UQX and can only use lower-tier monitors from Korea, like Samsung or LG, which are stuck in SDR. Then they start to hallucinate about what dynamic range means. I told these guys that whatever monitor looks like real life is the PG32UQX, which can basically be a window into the real world. They don't even know what that means. When I first picked a QD-OLED like the AW3423DW and placed it next to my G-Sync powered backlight mini-LED monitors from PG27UQ, PG35VQ, and PG32UQX, the AW3423DW immediately looked like garbage in comparison. I keep telling them I always use monitors in a pitch-black room to enjoy the full benefit of 1500+ nits large window-sized HDR. They even thought I was an OLED user.
Yeah no question that the PG32UQX is expensive and well beyond what most people are willing to spend on a monitor but I'm not at all doing a best value HDR monitor comparison here. I'm just showing what I believe is the best gaming HDR monitor vs what everyone else seems to be yelling at the top of their lungs as the best (all of these OLED monitors). Even when considering price, the Samsung G80SD is an outlier with all these launch promotions because people are sniping PG32UCDM's the moment they're in stock at $1299 when its effectively identical in performance outside of matte vs glossy to this Samsung G80SD that can be had for $900-999 before even including Samsungs $300 promotion. I personally don't think the $1750 that the PG32UQX goes on sale for is a huge stretch when you're already spending $1300 on a monitor. Besides that, monitors are a infrequent purchase for most. I'm not even going to get into OLED longevity but most hang onto monitors for 3-5 years so that price difference spread over 5 years of use is pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things. If you're an enthusiast who really values HDR, its a no brainer. But yeah, I agree with you. When it comes to HDR, the PG32UQX is unmatched. Especially this later version that seems to have a much more refined local dimming algorithm. I'm going to try some of these other mini led monitors soon but I don't have high hopes because they have no hardware Gsync module doing all the work. The problem is I feel like I'm speaking to an audience who are 50% sweaty esports players so image quality, resolution, HDR, etc are all generally irrelevant to them or at least very low priority. The only aspect of image quality they tend to value is motion clarity and outside of image quality, input lag. Those are both areas where these 240/360hz OLED's excel so I understand the discourse but this isn't an attack on their preference. It's just my opinions.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Monitor audiences are far from esports players whose goal is to win. Esports players use TN panels because they can still be faster, brighter, and more useful than short-lived OLEDs. The monitor audience won't change until they get out of impoverishment, and that won't happen anytime soon. So don't expect the internet to understand because they cannot even see HDR or compete in esports. The best thing to do is to use all available tools to make SDR into HDR1400 to enjoy content in a way no one else can. Life is short. There is little point in spending or even wasting time on the internet trying to convince the audience.
We can also tell your a fanboy. Fact is there's monitors out there under the PG32UQX that can do well in HDR. Also to believe just because it cost the most doesn't mean its going to perform the best. That's where people get it wrong Also HDMI 2.0? Yikes mistake #1 right there and rtings dont even have it on their page. Can't be the best for sure. Overhyped yea
@@DETERMINOLOGY Yet another clueless guy speaks out both nonsense and ignorance about the importance of the G-Sync module to drive the backlight fast and properly. It's obvious you don't even know how inferior the backlight behaves without a strong module like G-Sync. And G-Sync is never only about synchronization; it's an FPGA as a second layer of image processing. Do you think other modules have the same processing power as G-Sync? Nvidia never cares about HDMI. No high-end users care about HDMI; we care more about DP 2.1.
@@sedoterp1463 Its not my fault you up asus behind. Also we talking about picture quality and this is a good monitor. Also if ima pay 2k. HDMI 2.1 is a must = console option Newbies these days like you sound like you know half way what you talking about but fanboy - ism shows.
1:40 Except it doesn't work well for Resident Evil because the game clips the highlights at the configured luminance after rendering them at full brightness. This means the further from max game brightness you go, the less highlight details you get, looks awful unless you set a tonemapping curve.
This Samsung supports HGIG and tonemaps down to its luminance capability. There is a noticeable difference in highlight detail between HGIG off and on. Off just over brightens and loses details while on is dimmer but retains the detail.
You sold me on this display you absolute chav :P OLED in the living room, the AW3225QF on my desk, I knew something was not right with HDR, I just couldnt see honestly why people gave a shit about HDR. Until firing up the PG32UQX, it's beyond gorgeous. Now i'm torn at which to keep, may keep both.
A decent middle ground is the LG C4 48" or the LG C4 42". It will never be as bright as mini led, but I prefer it over blooming. The infinite contrast of OLED is preferable IMO. This is coming from my experience owning the Samsung G9 57" Ultrawide. The only way I would do MINI LED again is if they can do a better blooming algorithm and use a better panel for better contrast. I don't think IPS black is there yet.
Dude C4 so dim black crushing ! I saw Hisense ADS-pro full gloss 75” U8K , n this year U8N already incky black . U see so much more . Because C2 C3 A80L all sever low Color volume. Dim images can look grey tinted . Lack of pop .
How close is the Innocn 32MV2 to this Asus mini LED? I think you mentioned in the video that you've tried it before. Also, have you tried any of the newer LG C3 or C4 42 inch to compare with these? I believe the 42 inch TV Oled have have better brightness at larger window sizes such as 10% window.
The Innocn in my opinion doesn't really come close. The local dimming is a total mess in comparison. It will use way more zones then necessary to brighten a highlight so bloom is far more noticeable. On paper the Innocn is faster in terms of pixel response overall but in actual use I found it more blurry in motion. Maybe the lack of adaptive overdrive is what contributes to that. Yes I use to daily drive a LG C2 42. They are brighter at 10% but significantly more dim at 50% and above which means sometimes the LG's can be brighter and other times dimmer.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Do you think for general gaming, the C2 is a better experience than the Samsung G80SD, in term of just general brightness, especially at the game footages you've shown.
Even with its problems I prefer OLED but I also believe OLED as a technology will likely be beat by micro led. The problems most mini LEDs have are absolutely garish though, a good mini led like this one is also more expensive than some OLEDs. I
I cannot relate to this video at all. This person clearly has a strong like for high APL and peak brightness and isn't bothered by blooming. The assertion that miniLED's flaws don't appear often is wild. Blooming is obvious in nearly all environments when not gaming. It's especially obvious when browsing the web or moving the mouse cursor. I have owned several OLEDs and miniLEDs: *Alienware QD OLED monitor *Sony OLED TV *Asus MiniLED laptop I have also tried the Asus MiniLED he is using along with the Samsung Neo G8. They all have the same problem; *Obvious blooming -in windows, with subtitles, etc. *Terrible viewing angles *Limited micro contrast- 1000 dimming zones is just not enough *More input lag The list goes on. As long as you can mitigate the risk of burn-in, OLED's weakness is a lack of brightness above 20% window sizes. That doesn't happen often outside of high APL scenes in games and films.
I actually think the inverse is true in the TV market. Most companies have heavily banked on OLED and left LCD to stagnate. OLED TV's large window size brightness remains mediocre like the monitors, but 25% window size and below they are 2-4x brighter which makes a huge difference in perceived HDR impact. For most people, OLED TV's provide a fantastic viewing experience with little reason to move back to a LCD based model outside of very specific circumstances like an environment with limited ambient light control or those who are news network obsessed. Thankfully Sony has put R&D back into LCD in 2024 and along with TCL are really leading the charge toward making mini led TV's more competitive. I personally believe that these current OLED's have always been a stop gap solution and I'm relieved to see Sony pushing the envelope. In the future I think their approach of a LCD based flagships with OLED models filling their mid tier lineup will become the norm mainly because OLED isn't a jack of all trades and still can't adequately present all HDR content (bright stuff) while mini led handles the bright stuff with ease and is capable of doing dark stuff well enough that the difference doesn't matter to most. What I personally dislike is Samsung's approach to mini led based TV's and monitors where the local dimming tries so hard to suppress bloom in an attempt to compete with OLED contrast that it destroys picture quality. Let LCD flex where its best (brightness) instead of trying to strangle it into something it's not. You can see some more about Sony's 2024 mini led flagship here: th-cam.com/video/grBlT1DIqZk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=5eDELk-wFzeVubhr I'm also excited for this: www.tcl.com/global/en/monitors/27r83u
but the pixel response time on Oled is waaay faster without even needing overdrive , also the input lag on IPS and VA with HDR is too damn high, its basiclly trash specially in e sports games, and lastly there isn"t a single decent 27 qhd mini led moniter on the market (all of them r 4k 32inch) aside from the cooler master one but its 90% o the time of stock !!!
Great comparison dude. Please also consider comparing with the Neo G7/G8 and the new LG ( 27GR95UM) which I think are the best options under $1000 nowadays (also the only ones :/)
@@SolaceinScrutiny the lg got bad reviews on the lg page, looks like the local dimming isnt working, i think for the best hdr 1000 experience you need a gsync-ultimate modul :O will you post the comparison? g8 vs gr95um?
Yeah I keep hearing about poor performance but it has received a couple firmware updates that supposedly address its local dimming. LG was suppose to arrive today but looks like it won't come until Monday. I personally don't think its worth comparing to the Neo G8 (I'd rather compare it to the PG32UQX) but let me see first how it performs.
You should play AAA E-sports titles, they easily hit 240fps and more even at 4K. Then you'll see a ton of smearing and ghosting on the Mini-LED. This is the main reason I choose OLED.
The same reason , for the first time last 8 yrs -- WOLED TV globally have major price drop 😮for the first time because of High performance of mini LED (Google OS, not their low end Roku) Hisense ULED U8H U8K, now U8N U9N UX. n TCL QM8 , Qm851. LG C3 B3, G3 , SONY A80K A80L most likely Bravia 8. 😮 for the first time in hystory of Las Vegas -Consumer Electronic Show, SONY TVs didn’t show up , cuz their OLED n LED couldn’t match (too dim ) in 2023 . N later in Oct-Nov they release like A95L(QD-OLED)--made by Samsung .. N this year they didn’t show up once again cuz their line up can’t compete with EXTREME high end mini LED from (Google OS , not cheap Ass Roku ) Hisense TCL . 😅
Thanks for your enlightening video. Really detailed in panel strength and weakness especially in HDR. Want to ask, what monitor beside Asus that use AU Optronics M320DAN02.2 AHVA? Thx before.
Once PHOLEDs arrive oleds should get much brighter and more resistant to burn-in. I agree with you about the HDR experience, current oled monitors don't hold a candle to the mini-led monitors. However because of how good oleds motion clarity and input lag is I'll still stick with oled. Also the qd-oled TVs are way brighter for HDR.
@@SolaceinScrutinyAlso I forgot to mention that the HDR 1000 mode is complete garbage with the qd-oled monitors. HDR 400 is far more accurate and provides a proper HDR picture in all scenarios, although you won't get those very bright highlights in dark scenes.
I personally leave VRR off on my Alienware 34DW because of the flickering, none the less the monitor is still AMAZING, only upgrade from this would be ROG's 240hz 34 or 39" WOLED
10:10 is the Asus clipping or that's just how it looks being that it gets much brighter? The rocks are completely blown out no detail in the middle, same for waterfall. The shadowed cave in the left also looks better on the OLED thanks to the contrast. I use a C2 in a dim room but with fairly bright bias lighting to avoid eye strain as well as because in HDR bright games absolutely get bright enough. I really wouldn't want more luminance from a display unless I was always using it in a lit room which for gaming I try to avoid. LCDs and miniLEDs are dead tech imo unless you absolutely need 2000 nits highlights and full field. OLED is a nice stop gap unless microLED.
@@mertk.3386 Talk about what? The Samsung has more contrast, the Asus is brighter and even that doesn't cover up the massive gap in contrast. You can also pause at any point in the race and see how much blurrier the LCD is with the slower pixel response. I don't know what fps the game is getting but even if the OLED was match to 144fps to be equal to the Asus its still not even close. By all means if all you care about is brightness get an LCD monitor, but as far as mini-LED FALD monitors go that have a dimming algorithm as good as this Asus you can count on one hand, slim pickings.
It's just the camera. The Asus retains far more highlight detail especially in games with ridiculous HDR implementations like the original Horizen Zero Dawn that is mastered to 10000nits.
OLED is definitely not a perfect technology. But I prefer gaming and watching content in a very dark room. So for me OLED is king because of its deep blacks.
mini LED is way better than OLED except for refresh rate. if only they made 4k 240hz FLAT mini led, i dont care about perfect blacks as much as i care about high brightness and perfect RGB text rendering. OLED HDR looks so dull
Regarding the miniLED monitor - what about when it's not in HDR mode, does the backlight still work? For example productivity apps like Photoshop which have a darker background, is the backlight 100% on or if you would display a black image the zones there would be off like in HDR mode?
@@agiverreviga4592 local dimming will automatically come on for HDR. In SDR, I leave local dimming off unless I'm gaming. The monitor has a memory so you can set how you like. When I switch to SDR, local dimming shuts off. When I go to HDR it's enabled.
I took some science 🧬 program . Our PHd professor 👩🏫 de bunked the OLED/Plasma myth . She made clear -- eyes see BEST in brighten room than dim . Spring morning at garden always easier for eyes to see than 😮cloudy Day n Back of high rise building in shades . Eyes need brightness n color 😮! Mall light always better than In the dark . Especially fast moving image cause eyes strain n image loss:filter out as noise . We also need Color volume to see ! Bright parking lot , u don’t need black , u need COLOR ! Otherwise it’s pale n flat . Mini led had advanced such that can be vibrant rich in color to suit eyes . 👀 when it’s black enough . Eyes see at most comfort 😊
Really interesting, was thinking about getting a G80SD or even a LG C4 42 inch but might have to rethink it. I usually sit in a bright room and also can't stand flickering. Is there are 38-42 inch mini-led option that is a good choice, or is it 32 inches that has the worthwhile models? Edit: Also now realized the Mini-LED is almost twice the price of the monitors I considered... Feeling very lost what to get for about 1300 EUR at most!
There is nothing in the 38-42" worth buying which is a huge shame. The only alternative is the Neo G7 43 which is atrocious or its TV counterpart which is better but still too compromised. Yes this 3 year old Asus is still super expensive but its expense is IMO justified if your priority is HDR performance. Its sister model is the Viewsonic XG321UG which may be less expensive in your region. The other 32" options are the Innocn 32M2V (IPS), Neo G8 (VA), KTC M32P10 (IPS). There is also the Acer X32 and Asus PG32UQXR but both have half the zone count at 576 zones. I think a lot of the mini led development has slowed down both because OLED is less expensive to produce and far less complicated in terms of development (no backlight, no local dimming algorithm, etc) but also the average consumer is really wow'd by OLED contrast. I'm going to try and buy some of those other monitors to compare but they are all pretty expensive and I'm just a display hobbyist.
@@SolaceinScrutinyYou can always just get a VA mini-LED for much cheaper to achieve the same thing these fancy IPS are doing. They come with their own drswbacks but those have been mostly smoothed out recently.
I have a Neo G8 coming next week to compare. Having previously owned it, it doesn't come close to this PG32UQX but we'll see next week. I'll have a video up.
@@SolaceinScrutiny I wouldn't get any of the Samsung ones besides the 5120x1440 VA, if I recall correcrly the Neo G8 was a scam that only reached 1000nits when it advertised double.
@@anitaremenarova6662 Been considering a QN90-model at 43" actually but scared that there will be obvious haloing if used as a monitor. Not many people seem to use it so it's hard to find info, everyone is just getting the Lg C series as monitors.
Color brightness seems to be a huge issue with oled (even with qd-oled good color volume). colors just look muddy, lack of punchiness and contrast between different colors.
Yes the OLED can look completely lifeless and flat and its not a infrequent thing. Literally 60% of the content I consume results in ABL destroying the resulting image due to how dim it gets.
am i the only one here , look at the bright highlights too overblown lost detail and i mean a lot same with the dark higlights lost detail evrywhere its brighter and oles need some caching up but the mini led is too overblown in bright and dark highlights so its not ideal ither
This is just the camera due to the PG32UQX being so much brighter even when I handicapped it to just 1000nits. In person the highlights retain all their detail. I'm getting a new camera to better demonstrate these monitors.
It’s not about the price . The video is trying to De bunk the Myth that (oled best ) in science program , our pHD professor spend last lecture explain the Plasma/OLED best is lie . They r inferior than LED. 😮 human eyes do NOT see things -- 3D by how black , but brightness n SHADEs of Color Density for survival . In jungle n animal . U need light ! Oled has dim n cloudy day visual , in real life , eyes will NOT pick up image as fast as LED if constantly moving , due to lack of brightness n peak highlight . Things appear -- zoom OUT further , vs come to eyes closer (POP) . That’s why evey iPhone pro release , there is huge Brightness Jump on screen . U see better .
@@Yoga_Tv_buying For 1 m viewing Distance, 1000nits are plenty. I turn down to 500 on my oled. Also iphones dont get drastically brighter. From 1000 to 2000 is NOT 100% , because its logaritmic.
It’s all subjective. Your setting and everything make these side by side almost impossible to determine whether one is better than the other. Calibration is key in all of these examples.
i have an OLED and a mini LED display for an year, for comparison in movies, hdr or sdr, doesn't matter, oled always win. For me any technology than OLED will have like a little fog on the image, i don't know how to say in words what i see.
All consumer OLED tvs exhibit black crush. Monitors are even worse with both black crush AND poor EOTF tracking above shadow detail. OLED is only great for SDR. You are just used to this overly contrasty image. Bad minileds also do this to be fair. If you say you like OLED for the crisp motion, then fair enough. But for HDR it's no contest.
The mini-led is brighter, but look how washed out it. It looks like ass. Brighter does not equal better. I like having the ability to see the game's textures instead of seeing all that bloom. I could only imagine settings the PG32 to 1700 would only make it look even more washed out. Can't even see the details in the clouds.
It’s the other way around. I have this on my desk with two oleds and the most striking thing about it was realising how much detail was being lost in HDR scenes in things like clouds due to how dim they are. In SDR, the oleds wipe the floor with the PG32UQX, in HDR it’s the complete opposite and it’s not even close.
@@verttisyrjala2897 Yeah, I got LG's first desktop sized WOLED, and next to that the Dell AW3225QF (the QD-OLED panel) and now finally, this PG32UQX. Sitting on my floor is the Samsung NeoG8, a real turd of a mini-led display that does OLED levels of sustained brightness at best. Don't get me wrong, in purely dark scenes, the OLEDs smash, in literally everything else the PG32UQX is simply indescribable in what it does for HDR. I finally *get* HDR now, like I get why you would bother, too bad 99% of panels, including the OLEDs aint delivering that experience. Its night and day in any scene beyond pure blacks with the PG32UQX. Its like looking through a window almost to a real place. I'm playing Ghost of Tsushima in HDR and the scenes with the rising sun, or the sun beating down upon a forest full of leaves are literally breathtaking. Now I feel stuck between a rock and a hard place, because the PG32UQX has downsides, OLED has downsides, no new high performing mini-led displays are on the way, OLED is going to take years to get any reasonable level of brightness, so I feel like ive had a taste of "the good stuff" with no improvements to be seen for a very long time to come on the desktop, or even an equal. Just in case; Yes the motion could be better (but its honestly fine) but its not even close to the OLED, and yes in some scenes, you will (or at least I do) notice blooming. This thing is so phenominal for HDR i'm willing to overlook both of those things because what it does best, no other display comes close too, they are not even in the same league let alone anywhere close. Gonna keep the AW3255QF for games that purely employ darkness/a lot of blacks and for its good enough SDR performance. But referring to anything it does as "HDR" is a meme. Related: NOT having VRR flicker, id just decided to *settle* and accept it on the OLEDs, but being able to actually use VRR and not have to suffer random flickering even in well performing titles, its the icing on the cake.
Good video. Thanks. Kinda hard to see the difference on the phone screen. Prolly need to check them out in bestbuy if they have them on display. I kinda like my screens a little dim. I guess i got sensitive eyes. I guess thats why i really like oled. But i have never checked out mini led screens. Do you see any blooming on the asus in dark scenes?
Thank you. Yes I see blooming I think the blooming in dark scenes is acceptable given how bright it gets in every other scenario. Keep in mind that the blooming people recorded and documented in reviews when the Asus launched is not currently the case. It went through some firmware update or revision that completely changed how the local dimming behaves so it blooms far less now.
If your purpose to is to discuss brightness an LED is going to win. But that Asus is trash compare to QDOLED. You did not mention the much slower response times and input lag not as good. Also in dark games the QDOLED will show far more details. That ASUS is severely over priced and does not look as good in dark games over QDOLED. The bloom is awful for a monitor that is over 2K. OLED is SUPERIOR
Using a VA mini-LED would be a better comparison, that much is true but you can stay coping about OLED being superior when you need a pitch black room just to be able to use it. Response times and input lag are irrelevant, you will never notice the 2-3ms difference between a good LCD and OLED. For competitive games TN is the best anyways.
And here we are another one that consider only the brightness, no black no constranst no instant response time an so on, only brightness, even in sdr and in dark room. Guys if you think the same do NOT buy a monitor just buy a lamp! Much cheaper and soooo bright!
You mentioned the innocn 32mv, how different is that compared to the asus since its is a more compelling budget option with similar specs? Would you choose the qd oled over the innocn?
The Innocn's local dimming is significantly worse and its even more smeary than the Asus in motion. For most people its probably just fine but those are 2 big cons other than the at times buggy behavior.
No, I think you'll be overjoyed by the lack of bloom and smoothness of 360hz which will outweigh the brightness advantage of the KTC. Let me know if this turns out to be the case when you setup the G6.
@@SolaceinScrutiny you were not joking this monitor blows the KTC out of the water, while In full screen brightness and some highlights the KTC did get slightly brighter. The colors and overall imagine quality is much better on the oled, plus the 360 hz and the low response time are icing on the cake.
@@JuanSanchez-ho4mg I have the same doubt, I currently have an AOC Q27G3XMN 350USD and I just ordered the G6 OLED at 680USD, I hope the jump is worth it, I will report back as soon as it arrives
@@DiegoCL30 let me know if it’s as big as I experienced, I was actually considering the AOC over the KTC when I was buying mini led, went with the ktc for its higher zone count
You said you tried the Innocn 32m2v and it didn’t compare to the Asus, could you elaborate more on how the Asus was better? I have the 27m2v which is significantly brighter than the 32m2v and has a lower response time, so maybe the 27m2v would better compare to the Asus in your video?
Also, why didn’t you compare w-OLED to the Mini-led at all? The w-OLED usually beats qd OLED in contrast and has less saturated colors. Could you show another video comparing your w-OLED to mini-led? Thanks
I though the same. I hava a Samsung G6 and an Oled. The change is good, buy brightnes is not. I think that people feel that change, that big cause jumpo from lcd IPS to an Oled. From VA with zone or mini led, to Oled, It feels great, but is not that big. At least in many scenarios.
On the PG32UQX, I don't mind it at all. Its super unintrusive. On other monitors like the Samsung Neo G8 and Innocn 32M2V, its a horrible experience using local dimming on the desktop.
Yeah I think its pretty terrible. On paper its a faster panel and it has similar zone count but it not only looks much blurrier in motion to me but the local dimming is really poor.
As soon as its available I'll buy one to compare. Looks very impressive on paper but all of these mini-led monitors are at the mercy of their local dimming algorithms so even if it has 1100 zones and is capable of 1600nits, it means nothing if it crushes dark detail or the local dimming is inaccurate or slow.
@@SolaceinScrutinyPeople are saying it's really good. Being VA with 4000:1 contrast already blowe any of the IPS options out of the water given equal amount of zones.
I'm lucky enough to own both OLED and Mini-LED displays, and I almost always prefer the brightness of a well-tuned Mini-LED HDR picture. I wish they would make glossy Mini-LEDS!
same, i own both and the color difference is too much to use oled over mini-led, especially when forcing rec 2020 on hdr content.
@@xgunnas32Qd-oleds cover REC2020 better than minileds though.
Yeah very sad there is no Glossy LCD monitors always this horrible matte
This is the best LCD I've ever seen. It's remarkable what Asus achieved with this. Colour accuracy, motion, brightness, shadow quality, blooming control are all fantastic. I'm extremely picky and I honestly would never buy another LCD ever again, but this one is special. You should compare it with a Panasonic OLED TV or a Sony OLED TV. I highly doubt this compares to any other LCD.
I have used the pg32uqx for two yrs recently changed to the pg32ucdm and I can’t be happier. It’s so much smoother there is zero white smear that’s the issue with the uqx is white smear and the bloom but the oled has zero of either yes it’s not as bright but it’s so much cleaner looking image.
How have you found the HDR to be compared to the pg32uqx?
@@stagm3 it’s fantastic to say the leased.set to 1000 nits it’s amazing.
Line i said before the uqx is ok it’s just super old tech the panel is so slow it’s bad and has white smear. Look at some reviews of the uqx the panel is to slow and I notice white smear on like candles in d4 even or some other white items being displayed drives me crazy and the bloom is also a bad thing.
@@jasonmahrt9296ok thanks. I have the pg27uq and I love that monitor but I want something bigger and I’m deadlocked between the pg32uqx and the pg32ucdm
@@jasonmahrt9296I tried the pg32uqx annnnd umm yeah, was NOT impressed compared to my pg27uq. And the motion clarity or lack there of was definitely noticeable. Will be getting the oled !
@@stagm3 ya good deal it’s def better in every way. Glad you got a chance to see for yourself!
And you too can enjoy this better HDR experience for the affordable price of 4000$ CAD!
It goes on sale for about $2300 CAD. 😅
@@DrakonRI will do 75” U8N already with that price ! :):)
144hz PC Gamming - 4k . With AMD/Nvdia . N it’s a TV . (MediaTek Pentonic 700 chip ) 😅
@@DrakonR
ADS-PRO (American company BOE ,its new technology surpass VA) 2X contrast ratio of ADS. 500hz screen refresh rate 😊
N 180 degree OLED Viewing angle . Full gloss .
I M getting U8N(only 75” has ADS-pro. Rest are VA) or U9N (ADS-pro) this year .
I was genuinely surprised when I clicked to sub and found the sub count only 84. This channel deserves to be at least over 100k subs. I’m sure it’ll get there given the quality. Very nicely made video.
Thanks I really appreciate that. I'm new and just figuring things out but hopefully I can get a hold of more monitors and a better recording setup and make more comparisons that people want to see.
@@SolaceinScrutiny crazy good work doing this comparison. Only pity if you could film this in HDR
same
This is what I was saying since months and that I recently confirmed by buying the new MSI 240Hz OLED for comparison with my Acer X32 miniled. I prefer the X32 miniled hands down.
Even with the budget for a 1000€ OLED, I decided to buy a cheap miniLED monitor, the KOORUI GN10.
I really recommend it to everyone, it's HDR 1000 and VA, you'll have deep blacks and nice highlights.
It goes perfectly with my PS5.
turn up the contrast settings on pq32uqx, was playing spider man that shit was so bright I felt like transported into manhattan
Great video. I came to similar conclusions after trying an Asus PG32UCDM with the PG32UQX.
I wanna see a comparison between them
@@1TheHadar1 it's literally the same as this comparison. Same QD-OLED panel as this Samsung.
Thanks, I snagged one before the sale ended. If you don't mind me asking what setup do you run? I would have a fairly beefy pc hooked up to this as well as an xbox series x plus a PS5. Do you use any other displays in conjunction with this one? I plan on pairing it with a PG27AQN or maybe even a PG27AQNR when it releases at some point in the future for more competitive games.
The thing is the HDR1000 mode shouldn't ever be used. It dims so much that the PQ EOTF tracking almost always undertracks, unless it's a dim scene. HDR 400 is far more accurate, and looks better in I'd say over 90% of the scenes.
@@verttisyrjala2897 I'll stick with HDR 1400.
Solid video as ima make a few points
1. OLEDS in general are dimmer which you miss out alot of the brightness and as i watched the video in some areas the detail looks a tad bit cleaner but the brightness loss / OLED dim is to huge. I had a LG CX before and i use to look at it kinda sideways as it was dim as well. The contrast is there for sure but with that you lose it with how dim the panel is so its a + and - effect
2. You compared a 1,900$ Mini led to a 1,299 QD-OLED. I think this would been more apples to apples if you would of did the QD-OLED vs Samsung neo G7/G8. Alot of people not spending 2k on a monitor as well so this would of been in the ball park and a fair comparison
3. The content when playing games was being done on PC or console with HDR ON or OFF?
Other then that, Prob one of the best videos to show the difference between a QD-OLED and MINI LED. Mini LED is much richer and brighter and you dont lose much its like 95% of the oled and you dont have to worry about burn in / Dimming and Auto Static Brightness Limiter
Thanks, I appreciate it. This video wasn't really intended to be apples to apples, its to demonstrate the potential of mini-led and that it still has a place in todays market where there is an OLED frenzy. It's also to show that OLED still has a long way to go in my opinion before it really shines in HDR. Of course for most, these OLED's are awesome monitors, I just tend to scrutinize far more than the average joe.
This was all done on PC, just no where near enough flexibility on console. Also like I said, I had to reduce the PG32UQX's brightness because it gets so bright (1700nits from 1-50% window) that it makes the OLED look like I have it at 10% brightness.
EDIT: I'm in the process of getting a hold of a Neo G8 to compare to both the PG32UQX and G8 OLED.
@@SolaceinScrutinyI’m glad you do scrutinise like you do, because I wanted to get that exact OLED monitor, but after seeing how dim it is, I’m either going to wait for OLED to improve or get a 240hz Mini-LED
@@cameron2319 wise choice. Oled is extremely dim so on 1 hand you get the contrast but on the other it’s dim so it’s a + - effect which is what had to let go a lg cx. It’s had the contrast but the dimming was off
@@cameron2319either Hisense (Google Os) U8N or TCL QM851 now 144hz-4K PC with AMD/Nvdia . (MediaTek Pentonic700 chip)
Or next yr 156Hz (MediaTek Pentonic800) 😊
U8N already 1.5X contrast of SONY flagship X95L. 7 X contrast of X90L . Color volume Match S95C surpass s95B. Much better Visual than LG G3 G4 (bright n low Color density/volume , tinty )
U9N hasn’t released yet . Lol 😊
Problem with Mini Led FALD is, Vrr dont wor with Local dimming, so you lose nearly every FALD contrast. Also TFT Central tested and every Mini Led FALD backlight is flickering High Freq, wich can cause Headache.
Why haven't I heard any of this from anyone else? Have I just missed all those videos? I've seen like a hundred reviews over the past six months or so all raving about how great OLED is. Were they all lying?
OLED is great, just not the handicapped desktop monitor versions we currently have available to us.
Also, I wouldn't say they're lying, they are just incentivized to say mostly great things about OLED since they are provided the products for review. These are just my own opinions in the video, others of course feel differently.
Yes! My Samsung s90C TV is very bright, but my ultrawide monitor g8 oled gets dark and changes brightness all the time. I used to have an asus pg27uq and I still miss it, it was just so beautiful
Yes, OLED has tons of fanboys that refuse to acknowledge any flaws of the technology. That combined with people who've only ever used shitty office monitors up until their shiny new toy makes up the vast majority of those takes. At the end of the day it depends on your use case, neither is objectively better than the other.
@@anitaremenarova6662 and LG WOLED has banding pretty bad. I still don’t understand all the hype for the C1, I never loved mine, I sold it after 2 years and got the s90C
Most of these reviewers know fuck all and are little more than marketing engines.
All the OLED hype online pushed me to buy an LG C2 last year and while it is a huge upgrade over my 1440p LCD monitor from 2018, I really do regret buying it after over a year of using it so far. I know now that if I would've waited out a bit longer or did more research at that time, I would've ended up getting a QD-OLED or a high-end mini led TV and been much happier. Not like I had to break the bank or anything to get the C2 but I definitely should've done more research instead of buying into the hype from the massive online LG fanbase. The C2's mirror-like coating and starfield-like scenes in HDR were the only things that really wow'd my friends and family, but outside of that it didn't look that impressive at all especially for anime and sports which is what we mostly watch.
😢this hurts me to see ppl like I got tricked to get C2 or A95J n C3 A80L , B3 A75L etc n paying 3X price . N stress about burn in .
Ppl like u r the reason I started to upload tv videos last yr . 😮 C2 was not cheap at time ! 😮
yea its bullshit. The c series has been trash ever since the cx imo, besides c4, which is still a woled. qd-oled is simply superior to woled. Grab an s95b if you ever see a good deal and unlock its brightness in the service menu to 1500 nits. It looks so fucking good
@@crowntotheundergroud 100% agree. I think u mean S90C? S95B were prob long gone now hard to find. The S90C prob plenty if hunt around. Bit too dim for me tho as it is the Same brightness as that Samsung Odyssey. But in Canada n EU they have S92C which is sweet spot for pricing, for 1300nits without paying S95C price. Samsung is skechy tho, anyone buy Samsung TV needs to--NOT ever connect to Internet. They will FORCE update even it has set to “disable auto update”. N tv will slow down, n gets dimmer each time. Needs to get external streaming device . Mini LED or QD-OLED from Samsung can not escape it.
I wonder if they do that to the --PC screen now, shit i never thought of that. I guess the screen doesn’t need update, its a plug in n play type of thing. The Tv is like a PC on its own.
@@Yoga_Tv_buying u can unlock the brightness on the s90c as well using the same service menu adjustments. U won’t be able to do regular updates, which to me isn’t a big deal at all really. Oh okay u get it. I just read the rest of ur comment lol. Yea Samsung is awful nerfing the brightness of the s95b 30% among other things. I just use my pc to stream. I think the problem is when the prompt pops up asking either to “update now” or “update later” people think “update later” means “do not update for now” essentially, as they should, but it really means the update is just going to occur later on and u will not get the same notification.
The price of the Asus 32" PG32UQX is over 3k Cdn.
It goes on sale every now and then to about $2400 CAD. 😅
You always upload the videos I want. Thank you.
Thanks man, I appreciate it.
Thank you for this, Oled is overrated. I need brightness and nothing comes close to miniled. Your video is more objective than any reviewer.
No problem. I think OLED is a great step up from your average IPS/VA budget gaming monitor and has a place but its being put on a pedestal by most reviewers without really considering its short comings.
One of the reasons to stick with oled is the response time, motion clarity will be way better with a similiar refresh rate.
@@verttisyrjala2897Response time compared to good LCD panels is inconceivable by the naked eye. While you're correct on motion clarity that only applies to high refresh rate, for any singleplayer game below 120fps an LCD with strobing will provide better results.
@@anitaremenarova6662 No LCD can offer good HDR with strobing, and yes the difference is easily noticeable when strobing isn't enabled.
@@verttisyrjala2897That depends, it cuts brightness in half usually but if you already have something like 2000nits it won't matter too much.
I own the UQX and I absolutely love it. QD-Oled has its perks but so does a Mini-LED. Just get what is best for you.
Qd oled is far superior. Sorry for your loss
So glad to see a video saying what I've been expressing to everyone since the "Hype" of OLED's in the monitor space. I rock a PG32UQX and before that had the Asus 27 PG27UQ (It's older brother)... nothing touches a super high end mini led for HDR like these types of monitors. It's not even close. And the PG32UQX had near OLED blacks due its increased zone count over the older brother. THE only way OLED can compete with these high end Mini-LED monitors is for some companies to copy what Apple just came out a week ago with their "Tadem-OLED" (Basically Stacked OLED) and that's not even feasible for a gaming display, as the overhead of the GPU needing to run this stacked kind of display in perfect sync with each other would likely bring issues for VRR technologies and bandwidth/latency issues. It's sad that the entire industry is focusing on OLED's (Probably bc they are cheaper to produce) opposed to offering even more high end mini-led monitor options.
The PG32UQX ansi contrast ratio isn't all that great but actual content isn't checkboard pattern outside of like star fields so real world contrast is pretty good. Good enough that I also don't think the perceived difference is that big. Like I said in the video, its a marginal improvement while the difference in colors and brightness is a far more significant which is why I accept the PG32UQX's bloom as a trade off. The monitors biggest weakness is pixel response (especially white/light colors). If they would release a 5000+ zone successor with a faster panel and bumped the refresh rate to like 160 or 180hz, I don't think I'd need anything else until micro led comes to the PC monitor space.
I think we are a few GPU generations away from 4K/240 being achievable especially with so many future games being UE5 titles which I can't even break 70-90FPS in with a 4090 right now. Of course this doesn't apply to older titles or esports stuff but like I mentioned, I buy a high quality display to play games with high quality graphics.
Actually qd oled does use stacked layers. There are 3 layers of the blue emitter and many believe there is a green pholed layer as well. Its practically the same approach.
@@SolaceinScrutiny IPS has way more soothing colors and a better white point than VA don't you agree?
Impressive comparison
Thank you.
I can't believe it's been 3 years since I bought my mini led TV which is 1800 nits and there are still almost no options in the monitor market that are similar.
All we get is the same e-waste 200 nit oled panel announced from every manufacturer every year. The motion improvement is not worth the other drawbacks of oled.
After 7 months of research and returning a g9 I finally settled on the TCL 34R83Q, getting it next week, hope it's good enough. Should be around the same HDR performance as this Asus, if the backlight is as fast.
The TCL is still smaller and lower res than what I would want, but the monitor market is so bad and it's impossible to follow product cycles like with TVs. All you know is "maybe" something might come out in a couple of years and then it gets cancelled...
❤❤ same here . I had $5000 SHARP - made in Japan . LED TVs .
N the WOLED since the W means white light constantly blended in RGB to boost “brightness” (or lack of ) , not only they r Dim , also Low color on d dark grey . Just flat ! 😮
The TV market has flipped upside down too. Hisense U8N , TCL Q851 looks better than LG G4 , since they r bright n with Color Density/Volume Match with QD-OLED. 😮 it piss a lot of ppl off becusee they buy WOLED 😮to feel pristege , now LED look so much better . Lots ppl in denial 😮.
My U8G 2021 65” makes my 2023 -$1100 iPad-Pro with M2 Chip look like $300 junk 😮 . Its insane
One thing nobody seems to comment on is Samsung's inability to display orange correctly, its comes off as a pinkish red like at 6:17. I have both a QLED and an LG OLED and the issue is clear as day when comparing those too.
Gaming on mini led turned out to be far better than I thought, it really pulls you into the scene giving an immersive quality no other screens give. Any lighting effects it totally brings it alive in a game, the sun, special effects, street lights, or even just watching sdr content like star wars a light saber actually glows like crazy it's the coolest thing ever. For me the spot dynamic lighting effect alone is the biggest selling point it's just so cool and should be seen as a whole other attribute or technology. I keep hearing people not define it as such but just a brighter screen for better hdr, when in reality the spot lighting even on just sdr content is more of a selling point than better hdr since most things are sdr.
What’s the WOLED you keep throwing up? I thought this was a MiniLED and QD-OLED comparison?
Great Video. I recently sold my PG32UQX for the new PG32UCDM OLED display. While there are some things I do miss about it, the PG32UCDM is better in almost every way. Motion Clarity, 240hz refresh rate, 1000 nits peak is actually pretty bright when you have zero blooming and an amazing contrast in dark scenes. Full screen brightness, especially in daytime scenes is where the PG32UQX really shines and blows OLED out of the water.
Yeah its a preference thing. There are plenty here who believe the opposite. Just depends what characteristics you value more.
i would say the pg32uscdm is better for horror/dark games, pg32uqx is better in bright games :O
I like the look of the pg32uqx，and I feel like the pg32uqx looks better.
One of the reasons why apple using mini led instead of oled in their macbook pro, great video.
thats a lie apple dont use mini led thbey lied to yopu like always lie
@@AlexMkd1984my -- iPad PRO- M2 chip is Mini LED . I bought my iPad last summer new enough .
My M2 Chip iPad has same chip in Mac Pro. Lol 😝
The main reason is because of burn in concerns. Tandem oled tech gets bright as seen in latest the flagship iPad.
This is what I've been saying for years. OLED is awesome, but the brightness is worlds different. The brightest OLEDs only really get to 500-700 nits in a real game scene, thanks to ABL curves (LCDs also have ABL curves but they're far less aggressive).
I have an OLED phone that does 1600 nits of brightness sustained across the whole screen, which is 400 nits brighter than my PG32UQX can sustain across the whole screen! And while it looks amazing, the simple truth is I can't game on that phone, and OLED TVs/monitors can only do 200 nits fullscreen. The tech just isn't the perfect thing everyone always claims, and it's so frustrating hearing everyone talk about how incredible the barely HDR picture of an OLED is, whilst simultaneously dunking on competing tech that's just as flawed but better looking.
We really need MicroLED to just kill both sides so we can move on past this dumb debate and appreciate real HDR together.
Edit: 7:43
For what it's worth, I have a PG259QN (1st gen 360hz IPS with mediocre response times for the given refresh rate) and I greatly prefer my PG32UQX at 120hz even in competitive titles where I DO get 360hz, purely for the HDR picture. The brightness and color just reveal targets so easily and keep enemies visible even in pixel response blur.
Edit: 9:52
Asus and other Mini-LED manufacturers source their panels from AU Optronics, so we're waiting for them to make better panels. And Samsung doesn't know how to make something with adequate cooling so their Mini-LEDs have TONS of ABL, oh and they completely lied about the peak brightness of their Mini-LED displays... 2000 nits? Try 1200 peak 10% and 400 sustained 100%. Compared to the PG32UQX which does 1600 sustained 10% and 1200 sustained 100%.
Final Edit: Oh yeah, and companies like Hisense have managed to get much better zone density, like 3x that of the PG32UQX, as well as 10,000 nits peak brightness in some of the newer stuff. So these advancements will trickle down. I'd expect gen 3 Mini-LED to have 3000 nits of brightness, and 2000+ zones at the high end. AUO are making a 4608 zone 32 inch panel this year.
>AUO are making a 4608 zone 32 inch panel this year.
So we'll see consumer monitors with this in... 2030?
😆😭
@@Rusvul Nah, probably Q4 or Q1 next year.
@@edragyz8596 I dunno, it seems like the monitors with good specs and reasonable price are always "a year away".
For example the Acer X32Q FS got some announcement press in mid/late 2023 but now 6+ months later it still can't be bought in Americas (at least not that I've seen. People in China/Taiwan and maybe Australia can get them?)
I guess one positive is the PG32UQX is selling around 1800USD now instead of 3000.
My desk monitor is a QN90C Samsung Miniled tv. While it has black smearing and viewing angles aren't ideal while sitting close to it. It's advantage is that it can play HDR content throughout the whole day vs My A80j OLED who outshines it at night as a bed TV. Honestly I'm excited that Sony has decided to make their flagships Miniled instead. I'd love for them to release a 43 inch or other monitors. Their color accuracy, sharpness upscaling, and motion are just a step above the other brands. Well worth the premium. Miniled is coming!
Thanks for exposing OLED scam!
MiniLED ftw!
how does the mini led perform with the brightness turned down?
Great comparison. Wish you recorded in stereo, my left ear enjoyed the review 😂
The PG32UQX is a great monitor but for how old it is, I'm surprised that its still so expensive with no price drops. It costs double of the QDOLEDs where I live.
Thank you. Sorry about the audio, I'm a total noob. Yeah price is still a big issue but they're relatively affordable on the used market.
guys the pg32uqx is the best hdr 1000+ monitor on the market, it reaches like 1800 nits in hdr
@@Tuskabanana yeah this one here hits 1740nits all the way up to 50% window.
@@TuskabananaThere's others with comparable brightness now, for cheaper too.
@@anitaremenarova6662 i was thinking about Acer Nitro XV275KP3 4k mini led Monitor for 500€ used, but like i said i can get the pg27uq for 300€ and i got another offer for a acer predator x27 with silent fan mode for 400€, hard decision :=) !! which one would you pick
i have a PG32UQX, LG C2 42", 55" S95D, 85" QN900C, a Viewsonic 15.6 4k OLED portable monitor, and the PG32UQX destroys the OLEDs when it comes to HDR contents even the S95D. When the sun rises, it blinds my eyes, when playing God of War, it is breathtaking!! I can see all of details of the armors in God of War, the metals parts of the armors and axe look very shinny and bright while all they look dull on the OLEDs. One of the games where the OLEDs shine is Lies of P where the environments in the games are generally on the darker side. Even when viewing SDR, the Asus looks better than the OLEDs since it can go much brighter. Some people say a good monitor/tv is not about brightness, but it is when it comes to HDR. When the specular highlights in a video/movie is meant to be seen at 1000nit, your monitor needs to reach 1000nit for you to see them. Same goes with 1550 nit. 2000 nit...etc. OLED displays provide infinite contrast, but it doesn't mean it can provide the HDR impact such as a sun is rising up along the horizon. HDR impact makes you feel like you are there in the scene. On the other hand, OLED displays do much better than mini led when viewing a scene where we see a lot of buildings in the city at night from a drone view, which mini led tv/monitor struggle to display a clear image which the micro contrast on an OLED really shines. I understand the strengths and weaknesses of both technology and that's why I decided to own both. There is no need to argue which is better, get what works for you.
What 😮😮😮🎉 u have S95D ? Qn900C ? Damn those r amazing TVs i have seen them in person !!!
I absolutely agree with you! My entire family think Mini LEDs r higher end that OLED .
It’s the combo of Brightness , on top the Thick dense color volume casted on the brightness makes it 3D ! Mini LED has the more bright morning clean visual .
Also Dude … u should check out 2024 UX , U9N U8N . Those r d BEST LEDs out there .
The ADS-Pro . On digital trends latest video.
Angielski
Compared to the Asus, the Samsung looks slightly faded, as if the contrast was reduced, while the Asus looks like a TV in a supermarket, as if it had all the settings at max. That's why the difference in color perception can be so big. In Asus, burnouts and the resulting lack of details are often visible. It's a hard choice to make. The Asus is much more expensive, it looks better, but we don't usually use two monitors, so the difference may not be visible when using the Samsung, the image of which is undeniably phenomenal on its own. A big advantage of Asus is the durability of the Mini LED matrix, which theoretically is not as susceptible to burn-in as Samsung's QD OLED. If someone also uses a monitor for work, where static elements are displayed a lot of the time, the Asus may be an ideal solution for gaming and work. For a higher price, we have comparable or even better image parameters and, in addition, theoretically a much longer life of the Mini LED matrix, although these new OLED matrices are supposedly more and more durable, but they are probably not as good as the Mini LED matrix yet. It's a bit of a shame to buy a QD OLED monitor for a lot of money and then replace it with a new one after a few years or have it burn out. What do you think, am I right, or did I miss something?
Also, How did your mirror your monitors and retain the calibration for HDR?
Cancelled my G80SD because of this, I've owned OLEDs before but I got caught up in the hype again. The dimness, VRR, and stutter at low frame rates is unbearable on console.
Damn i was thinking of getting an oled monitor for my ps5,is it that bad?
@@fredinhoZnah BUT the HDR performance is meh, had the pg32ucdm and compared to my pg27uq , it just wasn’t enough to warrant me keeping it
@@stagm3 idrk what to buy anymore.if im going oled ill def buy the g80sd but idk i feel like that much of a price just for oled is a bit much,you can get the same specs but on ips,just not sure if oled is really worth that much and im also scared of burn in
@@fredinhoZ burn in is always a possibility with OLED, always have to consider that idc what people say but with the 3 year protection at least there’s some peace of mind, I enjoyed the asus pg32ucdm for the most part, the hdr was just not up to snuff compared to my pg27uq
@@stagm3 thats the thing i still dont know if theres warranty with the g80sd,if i do decide to not get oled ill prolly go for the g70b, same specs but ips and a bit lower hz but im on console so it doesn’t effect me
Is the audio not stereo? I can only hear from left ear.
it is sereo and he is standing on our left. Imagine watching hellblade LOL
Yeah sorry I goofed the audio.
I have the ViewSonic XG321UG which is basically the same monitor as the PG32UQX as it uses exact the same panel from AU Optronics and I agree with your observations. Which local dimming setting do you use in HDR? I use the balanced one, where small highlights are a bit brighter and transition of the zones is less aggressive. In SDR I can use the faster setting.
I think there is a difference between the two when it comes to local dimming. The newer revisions of the PG32UQX it makes no sense to use anything but the level 3 or fastest setting which behaves some where between the XG321UG's balanced and fastest setting.
i was using the pg32uqx but i upgraded to a samsung 8k qn700b. i do hope we get more miniled offerings, otherwise i fear we will have to wait 10 years or more for microled to become available.
I think with Sony moving from OLED to mini-led for its flagship TV this year is a sign of good things to come.
For a TV I love my mini LED but for a monitor I do prefer a OLED with little to no blooming
Yeah TV environment can be very different from a monitor. Many can't control the light in a living area where a TV is placed so the extra brightness helps to offset the ambient light.
I'd say it's the exact opposite, no burn-in or text on a TV with OLED being much brighter there.
I couldnt agree more. I bought the corsair flex oled and was shocked at how bad it was for most of my needs. Maybe for gaming and media consumption of dark scenes its great but overall its not good. I "upgraded" to a $400 no brand hdr1000 mini led and I love it so much more.
My two cents regarding OLED (used to have one):
1440p resolution at 27 inches is not enough, especially for office work and even regular internet surfing. I was one of those people who thought it was possible to do productive work on it, but the pixel structure and low PPI made themselves felt. I felt nausea, like something in my eye, and it took a week to get used to it
with app help called "Mac Type" you can mitigate the effect
Color fringing, the VRR flicker happens to me much more often than I would prefer, and it also distracts me. I'm trying to adapt to this
They both have their benefits in drawbacks. Realistically, you can compare them side by side. Mini-LED is brighter and will affect how the OLED looks with how the camera and your eyes adjust. A mini-LED will perform better in a dark room. An OLED will have better contrast and deeper blacks that will allow for better dark content in the future. Apple's new iPad Pro OLED screen makes the old pro look blue. OLED is also better for your eyes. Most of the issues that have been pointed out about the Samsung seem to be software related and not the panel. These can be fixed by firmware updates. OLED has also has more potential.
Hey I have the ipad-pro with M2 chip . I know exactly the weird dim look that ipad has. My LED QLED TV makes my $1100 Ipad pro looks like $300 dog shi. When side by side Weirdest thing.
Ipad mini LED must used the Same technology as SONY. ---🟦 light coming from Back as BASE light, mix with h🟩🟥 at front to ---CREATe ⬜️white. it does NOT have real normal white. all their whites are always s👕(for SONY for decade) now👚. ALL SONY TVs are always severly pestle due to STrong Blue base light that u can NOT calibrate out of it even tho the RURUS will promote” accurate color(film)” bs.
at 2010-2011 the Global LED TVs were 100% produced by SHARP Tv in Japan. All SONY were SHARP with SONY Logo. in 2015 Hisense bougth SHARP TV brand then Toshiba. SO Samsung n Hisense r the 2 TV displays with Best LED technology n patterns other screen manufactures cant touch. they have white ⬜️ coming from Back , meet --🟥🟩🟦 at Front to creat most vibran t🟥🟩🟫🟪🟨🟧. when the rest of SONY n most of LED displays use that Blue🟦light as base light which Significantly degrades image level. but MORE Premium LED existed all this time. Ppl Assume SONY n Apple best so if things dont look that good, they think its LED issues.
The Mini LEDs TVS this year U8N , QM851 are insane stunning . They can do 144hz -4k gamming with AMD/Nvdia. WOLED--due to having ⬜️ 🟩🟦🟥 at all time, they have 1/3 Color DENSITY of LED. Because the Strong WHITE light MIX (instead of LED will TRANSFORM into color) WOLED MIX with color , n dilutes the light like no joke. they HIGHLY relying being DIM to boost Black blocks to creat aritficial IMPRESSION of high contrast. . MOST images are SEEN by COLOR/Highlight . a Spring morning day will 100% be more plesant eye than Cloudy day or in shadow behind tall building. in Dim visual, takes BRAIN longer to register What is What. so actually--DRASTICALLY slow down in BRAIN processing image can cause visual blur n slow down in judgement (from brain , what is hidden enemy or some aritfact) , which negates the whole reason buying fastest refreshrate or pc processing. --thats said by science professor debunking OLED/Plasma. since OLED so dim/ low in color even with black on some trims, most image looks grey , dim dull in shadow, lots visual blur. that OLED “best” is confirmation bias not at anyone’s fault but its getting de bunked now by premium Leds.
American company BOE just invented MORE premium LED screen called ADS-PRO. 180 degree viewing angle, full Gloss, 600hz screen refresh rate. 2X contrast ratio of typical ADS. I have seen it, its INSANE. they are putting in U9N UX , n 75” U8N U7N (TVS, gamming tvs). Samsung had it last year but they are Suing BOE this year so they dont get those premium Screens anymore. 😊
Yeah, if u get Mini LED PC monitors . I would get from Samsung or Hisense. Other brands use diff LED technology.
Its kind of a shame how the manufacturers limit the monitors when QD oled TVs can get alot brighter. The 10 percent window performance is very important for hdr gaming
4:54 Flicker is due to PWM. Well, it's caused because the way VRR works on OLED is by recalculating the brightness from the previous frame, it's not the same as LCD. Most modern LCD displays use DC for brightness dimming, I say most because even LCD panels can use PWM. LTT did a video on the ROG Zephyrus G14/G16 that explains it, where in the process of getting a lower power VRR solution they kinda elegantly solve VRR flicker at the same time.
Yes but regardless its visible to the eye and should be taken into consideration until manufacturers make progress toward reducing it.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Oh I don't disagree, I'm just adding onto the conversation with information. Another piece of information is that some phone manufacturers advertise flicker free eye care by ramping up the OLED display PWM (some 400 and others 1,000+) so throughout the brightness range flicker becomes imperceptible.
Situation in EU is horrible. We can either choose Samsung Odyssey Neo G7, Neo G8 or Neo G9, or choose a 576 local dimming zones 4K monitor that costs as much or more than the Neo G7 and G8, more than a 1440p OLED. Granted it's 4K at least at 27 inch with good PPI.
What 576 zones mini-LED would you recommend the most? Have you tested them? It's impossible to get 1152 zones IPS miniLED with true HDR 1000+ here, which is what I would've liked.
I had tried the Acer XV275K P3 but it's local dimming solution is horrible. It's bright for sure but in the majority of scenes the blooming is readily visible and very intense.
Innocn 27M2V is not available in EU? I can't recommend any of the 576 zone monitors available today. They are all plagued with poor local dimming algorithms and I don't personally think the zone count is acceptable now a days. I actually think the 384 zone PG27UQ and X27 from almost 6 years ago perform better than these new 576 zone monitors.
There is the Asus PG32UQXR but I haven't tested it myself. I'm interested in getting one in the future to test but I've only heard bad things about the overdrive tuning.
@@SolaceinScrutiny thats what i expected, pg27uq + acer predator x27 will work better than new mini led monitors, cause of the gsync-ultimate modul, which helps with the dimming algorithm.
btw the Asus PG32UQXR is a low tier version of the pg32uqx, its absolute garbage, pg32uqx is way better
Yeah its a regression from its 3 year old predecessor in every way other than pixel response. I personally don't understand why it exists to be honest. It's MSRP is $1299 but should be like $899 or less.
@@SolaceinScrutiny y they just abuse the name to make money with the pg32uqrx, crazy enough is alot of ppl think the pg32uqrx is better, but in reality its worse :O
I’ve had the UQX and the HDR was indescribably gorgeous, but the motion quality was abysmal, actually unusable for me…
Hi, based on this video, do you have any experience with the Philips Evnia 32M2N6800M ? It's a similar monitor as the PG32UQX but I can't find any good reviews yet.
This is why I up the gama on the QD OLED. I don't care about accuracy when I get a brighter image.
Firmware update just came out for the G8, to address the VRR flicker, apparently it is fixed.
He had the VRR control off
Got an OLED TV but sometimes I dislike the image, a lot. Like many bright daytime scenes never seem to look like... bright daytime. That bums the hell out of me. Then sometimes it looks spectacular, like something I've never seen before.
The other option was a VA-panel TV with a viewing angle of like 10 degrees :D I love my VA monitor, but on a TV the viewing angle seems to matter a lot more. I tried a 1500€ Sony one, and the amount of disbelief I was processing when I noticed the problem, was actually funny in hindsight :D
In conclusion - OLED is the only TV tech that is currently a viable option. Monitors - just stay clear of Samsung lol
Like Hisense U8N/ U7N, then U8K/ U7K. Then the U9N (about to launch this year in 75” 85”) then the UX 98” 110”. --ADS-PRO panel.
U8K , U7K It has MediaTek Pentonic700 Chip. That can do 144hz Full 4k Pc gamming with AMD/Nvdia. (Only tv could do that in 2023) . Also Samsung Flagship Q90C has ADS-PRO panel. They all have very advanced ADS-PRO Screen.
-180 Degree viewing angle.
-2X contrast ratio of Typical ADS.
screens.
-N 600hz screen refresh rate. When ADS /IPS has low contrast, n 144hz cap screen refresh rate.
-because it does not require anti Glare layer. It does NOT have the 🌈 smear on that X93L, X95L, Bravia9 . Nor it has the wide angle matting layer that x90L or Bravia7 have. They look like Star ⭐️ Trek portal.
Next year MediaTek are launching Pentonic800 Chip that can do 156hz PC gamming. So those with ADS-PRO will be crazy :) but yes prob in larger screen prob too big for tv monitor lol 😂
Shame the price of these mini LEDs has shot up to atmospheric levels. I can ejther buy 3 32" 4K oleds for $1300 each or 1 Asus mini LED for $4000...
You forgot one big difference.. The Price!! lol 2000 dollars for a 3 year old monitor.
Hey, that's nothing. It launched at $3000.
The problem with the misconception of HDR is that many Internet users are mostly dirt poor. They cannot afford high-end monitors like the true HDR monitor PG32UQX and can only use lower-tier monitors from Korea, like Samsung or LG, which are stuck in SDR. Then they start to hallucinate about what dynamic range means. I told these guys that whatever monitor looks like real life is the PG32UQX, which can basically be a window into the real world. They don't even know what that means. When I first picked a QD-OLED like the AW3423DW and placed it next to my G-Sync powered backlight mini-LED monitors from PG27UQ, PG35VQ, and PG32UQX, the AW3423DW immediately looked like garbage in comparison. I keep telling them I always use monitors in a pitch-black room to enjoy the full benefit of 1500+ nits large window-sized HDR. They even thought I was an OLED user.
Yeah no question that the PG32UQX is expensive and well beyond what most people are willing to spend on a monitor but I'm not at all doing a best value HDR monitor comparison here. I'm just showing what I believe is the best gaming HDR monitor vs what everyone else seems to be yelling at the top of their lungs as the best (all of these OLED monitors). Even when considering price, the Samsung G80SD is an outlier with all these launch promotions because people are sniping PG32UCDM's the moment they're in stock at $1299 when its effectively identical in performance outside of matte vs glossy to this Samsung G80SD that can be had for $900-999 before even including Samsungs $300 promotion.
I personally don't think the $1750 that the PG32UQX goes on sale for is a huge stretch when you're already spending $1300 on a monitor. Besides that, monitors are a infrequent purchase for most. I'm not even going to get into OLED longevity but most hang onto monitors for 3-5 years so that price difference spread over 5 years of use is pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things. If you're an enthusiast who really values HDR, its a no brainer.
But yeah, I agree with you. When it comes to HDR, the PG32UQX is unmatched. Especially this later version that seems to have a much more refined local dimming algorithm. I'm going to try some of these other mini led monitors soon but I don't have high hopes because they have no hardware Gsync module doing all the work.
The problem is I feel like I'm speaking to an audience who are 50% sweaty esports players so image quality, resolution, HDR, etc are all generally irrelevant to them or at least very low priority. The only aspect of image quality they tend to value is motion clarity and outside of image quality, input lag. Those are both areas where these 240/360hz OLED's excel so I understand the discourse but this isn't an attack on their preference. It's just my opinions.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Monitor audiences are far from esports players whose goal is to win. Esports players use TN panels because they can still be faster, brighter, and more useful than short-lived OLEDs. The monitor audience won't change until they get out of impoverishment, and that won't happen anytime soon. So don't expect the internet to understand because they cannot even see HDR or compete in esports. The best thing to do is to use all available tools to make SDR into HDR1400 to enjoy content in a way no one else can. Life is short. There is little point in spending or even wasting time on the internet trying to convince the audience.
We can also tell your a fanboy. Fact is there's monitors out there under the PG32UQX that can do well in HDR. Also to believe just because it cost the most doesn't mean its going to perform the best.
That's where people get it wrong
Also HDMI 2.0? Yikes mistake #1 right there and rtings dont even have it on their page. Can't be the best for sure. Overhyped yea
@@DETERMINOLOGY Yet another clueless guy speaks out both nonsense and ignorance about the importance of the G-Sync module to drive the backlight fast and properly. It's obvious you don't even know how inferior the backlight behaves without a strong module like G-Sync. And G-Sync is never only about synchronization; it's an FPGA as a second layer of image processing. Do you think other modules have the same processing power as G-Sync? Nvidia never cares about HDMI. No high-end users care about HDMI; we care more about DP 2.1.
@@sedoterp1463 Its not my fault you up asus behind. Also we talking about picture quality and this is a good monitor. Also if ima pay 2k. HDMI 2.1 is a must = console option
Newbies these days like you sound like you know half way what you talking about but fanboy - ism shows.
1:40
Except it doesn't work well for Resident Evil because the game clips the highlights at the configured luminance after rendering them at full brightness. This means the further from max game brightness you go, the less highlight details you get, looks awful unless you set a tonemapping curve.
This Samsung supports HGIG and tonemaps down to its luminance capability. There is a noticeable difference in highlight detail between HGIG off and on. Off just over brightens and loses details while on is dimmer but retains the detail.
@@SolaceinScrutiny In Resident Evil specifically, there is no detail at an engine level for HGIG to preserve.
You sold me on this display you absolute chav :P
OLED in the living room, the AW3225QF on my desk, I knew something was not right with HDR, I just couldnt see honestly why people gave a shit about HDR. Until firing up the PG32UQX, it's beyond gorgeous. Now i'm torn at which to keep, may keep both.
The price is stupid for that miniled. Just plain stupid.
Amazing video thanks bro
No problem 👍
A decent middle ground is the LG C4 48" or the LG C4 42". It will never be as bright as mini led, but I prefer it over blooming. The infinite contrast of OLED is preferable IMO.
This is coming from my experience owning the Samsung G9 57" Ultrawide.
The only way I would do MINI LED again is if they can do a better blooming algorithm and use a better panel for better contrast. I don't think IPS black is there yet.
Dude C4 so dim black crushing ! I saw Hisense ADS-pro full gloss 75” U8K , n this year U8N already incky black . U see so much more . Because C2 C3 A80L all sever low Color volume. Dim images can look grey tinted . Lack of pop .
ADS-pro has 2X contrast ratio of -- ADS . It has 500hz screen refresh rate . Hisense U8K 75”, U8N 75” , U9N UX r doing these .
How close is the Innocn 32MV2 to this Asus mini LED? I think you mentioned in the video that you've tried it before. Also, have you tried any of the newer LG C3 or C4 42 inch to compare with these? I believe the 42 inch TV Oled have have better brightness at larger window sizes such as 10% window.
The Innocn in my opinion doesn't really come close. The local dimming is a total mess in comparison. It will use way more zones then necessary to brighten a highlight so bloom is far more noticeable. On paper the Innocn is faster in terms of pixel response overall but in actual use I found it more blurry in motion. Maybe the lack of adaptive overdrive is what contributes to that.
Yes I use to daily drive a LG C2 42. They are brighter at 10% but significantly more dim at 50% and above which means sometimes the LG's can be brighter and other times dimmer.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Do you think for general gaming, the C2 is a better experience than the Samsung G80SD, in term of just general brightness, especially at the game footages you've shown.
Even with its problems I prefer OLED but I also believe OLED as a technology will likely be beat by micro led.
The problems most mini LEDs have are absolutely garish though, a good mini led like this one is also more expensive than some OLEDs. I
I cannot relate to this video at all. This person clearly has a strong like for high APL and peak brightness and isn't bothered by blooming.
The assertion that miniLED's flaws don't appear often is wild. Blooming is obvious in nearly all environments when not gaming. It's especially obvious when browsing the web or moving the mouse cursor.
I have owned several OLEDs and miniLEDs:
*Alienware QD OLED monitor
*Sony OLED TV
*Asus MiniLED laptop
I have also tried the Asus MiniLED he is using along with the Samsung Neo G8.
They all have the same problem;
*Obvious blooming -in windows, with subtitles, etc.
*Terrible viewing angles
*Limited micro contrast- 1000 dimming zones is just not enough
*More input lag
The list goes on. As long as you can mitigate the risk of burn-in, OLED's weakness is a lack of brightness above 20% window sizes. That doesn't happen often outside of high APL scenes in games and films.
I think we all understand OLED monitors are still extremely underwhelming.
Do you feel like the TV market of OLED vs LED is under the same situation?
I actually think the inverse is true in the TV market. Most companies have heavily banked on OLED and left LCD to stagnate. OLED TV's large window size brightness remains mediocre like the monitors, but 25% window size and below they are 2-4x brighter which makes a huge difference in perceived HDR impact. For most people, OLED TV's provide a fantastic viewing experience with little reason to move back to a LCD based model outside of very specific circumstances like an environment with limited ambient light control or those who are news network obsessed.
Thankfully Sony has put R&D back into LCD in 2024 and along with TCL are really leading the charge toward making mini led TV's more competitive. I personally believe that these current OLED's have always been a stop gap solution and I'm relieved to see Sony pushing the envelope. In the future I think their approach of a LCD based flagships with OLED models filling their mid tier lineup will become the norm mainly because OLED isn't a jack of all trades and still can't adequately present all HDR content (bright stuff) while mini led handles the bright stuff with ease and is capable of doing dark stuff well enough that the difference doesn't matter to most. What I personally dislike is Samsung's approach to mini led based TV's and monitors where the local dimming tries so hard to suppress bloom in an attempt to compete with OLED contrast that it destroys picture quality. Let LCD flex where its best (brightness) instead of trying to strangle it into something it's not.
You can see some more about Sony's 2024 mini led flagship here:
th-cam.com/video/grBlT1DIqZk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=5eDELk-wFzeVubhr
I'm also excited for this:
www.tcl.com/global/en/monitors/27r83u
one question? who is better the last LG OLED 32 240 hz or Samsung OLED G8 32 for gaming and works with photoshop thanx !!
but the pixel response time on Oled is waaay faster without even needing overdrive , also the input lag on IPS and VA with HDR is too damn high, its basiclly trash specially in e sports games, and lastly there isn"t a single decent 27 qhd mini led moniter on the market (all of them r 4k 32inch) aside from the cooler master one but its 90% o the time of stock !!!
Great comparison dude. Please also consider comparing with the Neo G7/G8 and the new LG ( 27GR95UM) which I think are the best options under $1000 nowadays (also the only ones :/)
Thank you. Yeah I have the Neo G8 now and the LG should be coming at the end of the week.
@@SolaceinScrutiny the lg got bad reviews on the lg page, looks like the local dimming isnt working, i think for the best hdr 1000 experience you need a gsync-ultimate modul :O
will you post the comparison? g8 vs gr95um?
Yeah I keep hearing about poor performance but it has received a couple firmware updates that supposedly address its local dimming. LG was suppose to arrive today but looks like it won't come until Monday. I personally don't think its worth comparing to the Neo G8 (I'd rather compare it to the PG32UQX) but let me see first how it performs.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Yeah, im looking forward for the lg 27ugm vs Pg32uqx :=)
You should play AAA E-sports titles, they easily hit 240fps and more even at 4K. Then you'll see a ton of smearing and ghosting on the Mini-LED. This is the main reason I choose OLED.
The same reason , for the first time last 8 yrs -- WOLED TV globally have major price drop 😮for the first time because of High performance of mini LED (Google OS, not their low end Roku) Hisense ULED U8H U8K, now U8N U9N UX. n TCL QM8 , Qm851. LG C3 B3, G3 , SONY A80K A80L most likely Bravia 8. 😮 for the first time in hystory of Las Vegas -Consumer Electronic Show, SONY TVs didn’t show up , cuz their OLED n LED couldn’t match (too dim ) in 2023 . N later in Oct-Nov they release like A95L(QD-OLED)--made by Samsung .. N this year they didn’t show up once again cuz their line up can’t compete with EXTREME high end mini LED from (Google OS , not cheap Ass Roku ) Hisense TCL . 😅
Thanks for your enlightening video. Really detailed in panel strength and weakness especially in HDR. Want to ask, what monitor beside Asus that use AU Optronics M320DAN02.2 AHVA? Thx before.
No problem, thanks for watching. Viewsonic XG321UG.
The AOC PD32M use the same panel?
Once PHOLEDs arrive oleds should get much brighter and more resistant to burn-in. I agree with you about the HDR experience, current oled monitors don't hold a candle to the mini-led monitors. However because of how good oleds motion clarity and input lag is I'll still stick with oled.
Also the qd-oled TVs are way brighter for HDR.
Looking forward to PHOLED but it looks to be quite a ways out for the desktop monitor market. Maybe late 2026.
@@SolaceinScrutinyAlso I forgot to mention that the HDR 1000 mode is complete garbage with the qd-oled monitors. HDR 400 is far more accurate and provides a proper HDR picture in all scenarios, although you won't get those very bright highlights in dark scenes.
I personally leave VRR off on my Alienware 34DW because of the flickering, none the less the monitor is still AMAZING, only upgrade from this would be ROG's 240hz 34 or 39" WOLED
you can get rid of vrr flicker with CRU Tool, watch a tut to modify LFC Range.
10:10 is the Asus clipping or that's just how it looks being that it gets much brighter? The rocks are completely blown out no detail in the middle, same for waterfall. The shadowed cave in the left also looks better on the OLED thanks to the contrast. I use a C2 in a dim room but with fairly bright bias lighting to avoid eye strain as well as because in HDR bright games absolutely get bright enough. I really wouldn't want more luminance from a display unless I was always using it in a lit room which for gaming I try to avoid.
LCDs and miniLEDs are dead tech imo unless you absolutely need 2000 nits highlights and full field. OLED is a nice stop gap unless microLED.
check out 10:35 mate, and talk again.
@@mertk.3386 Talk about what? The Samsung has more contrast, the Asus is brighter and even that doesn't cover up the massive gap in contrast. You can also pause at any point in the race and see how much blurrier the LCD is with the slower pixel response. I don't know what fps the game is getting but even if the OLED was match to 144fps to be equal to the Asus its still not even close. By all means if all you care about is brightness get an LCD monitor, but as far as mini-LED FALD monitors go that have a dimming algorithm as good as this Asus you can count on one hand, slim pickings.
It's just the camera. The Asus retains far more highlight detail especially in games with ridiculous HDR implementations like the original Horizen Zero Dawn that is mastered to 10000nits.
I should have bought the PG32UQX when it priced at 2500. Mini led is the way to go for HDR.
It’s $1599 if you have a local MicroCenter
OLED is definitely not a perfect technology. But I prefer gaming and watching content in a very dark room. So for me OLED is king because of its deep blacks.
Looks great even as I watch this on my LG DualUp's very limited HDR mode 😅
If this had HDMI 2.1 I'd probably impulse buy and worry about it later
Do you think is better to get the PG32UQX ? I'm in the market for a new
32 monitor.
How does the ASUS PG32UQXR compare to the non-R version here?
mini LED is way better than OLED except for refresh rate. if only they made 4k 240hz FLAT mini led, i dont care about perfect blacks as much as i care about high brightness and perfect RGB text rendering. OLED HDR looks so dull
Damn why did Samsung put that disgusting matte coating on that display
Glare issue . They r putting that Matted screen on Flagship QD-OLEd S95D TV this year 😮. Ppl r raged . 😊
Regarding the miniLED monitor - what about when it's not in HDR mode, does the backlight still work?
For example productivity apps like Photoshop which have a darker background, is the backlight 100% on or if you would display a black image the zones there would be off like in HDR mode?
The backlight can be toggled on or off at any point.
@@DrakonR So it's a separate manual toggle? I was under the impression that it only gets activated when HDR mode in Windows is on
@@agiverreviga4592 local dimming will automatically come on for HDR. In SDR, I leave local dimming off unless I'm gaming. The monitor has a memory so you can set how you like.
When I switch to SDR, local dimming shuts off. When I go to HDR it's enabled.
I took some science 🧬 program . Our PHd professor 👩🏫 de bunked the OLED/Plasma myth . She made clear -- eyes see BEST in brighten room than dim .
Spring morning at garden always easier for eyes to see than 😮cloudy Day n Back of high rise building in shades . Eyes need brightness n color 😮! Mall light always better than In the dark .
Especially fast moving image cause eyes strain n image loss:filter out as noise .
We also need Color volume to see ! Bright parking lot , u don’t need black , u need COLOR ! Otherwise it’s pale n flat . Mini led had advanced such that can be vibrant rich in color to suit eyes . 👀 when it’s black enough . Eyes see at most comfort 😊
Really interesting, was thinking about getting a G80SD or even a LG C4 42 inch but might have to rethink it. I usually sit in a bright room and also can't stand flickering. Is there are 38-42 inch mini-led option that is a good choice, or is it 32 inches that has the worthwhile models?
Edit: Also now realized the Mini-LED is almost twice the price of the monitors I considered... Feeling very lost what to get for about 1300 EUR at most!
There is nothing in the 38-42" worth buying which is a huge shame. The only alternative is the Neo G7 43 which is atrocious or its TV counterpart which is better but still too compromised.
Yes this 3 year old Asus is still super expensive but its expense is IMO justified if your priority is HDR performance. Its sister model is the Viewsonic XG321UG which may be less expensive in your region.
The other 32" options are the Innocn 32M2V (IPS), Neo G8 (VA), KTC M32P10 (IPS). There is also the Acer X32 and Asus PG32UQXR but both have half the zone count at 576 zones.
I think a lot of the mini led development has slowed down both because OLED is less expensive to produce and far less complicated in terms of development (no backlight, no local dimming algorithm, etc) but also the average consumer is really wow'd by OLED contrast.
I'm going to try and buy some of those other monitors to compare but they are all pretty expensive and I'm just a display hobbyist.
@@SolaceinScrutinyYou can always just get a VA mini-LED for much cheaper to achieve the same thing these fancy IPS are doing. They come with their own drswbacks but those have been mostly smoothed out recently.
I have a Neo G8 coming next week to compare. Having previously owned it, it doesn't come close to this PG32UQX but we'll see next week. I'll have a video up.
@@SolaceinScrutiny I wouldn't get any of the Samsung ones besides the 5120x1440 VA, if I recall correcrly the Neo G8 was a scam that only reached 1000nits when it advertised double.
@@anitaremenarova6662 Been considering a QN90-model at 43" actually but scared that there will be obvious haloing if used as a monitor. Not many people seem to use it so it's hard to find info, everyone is just getting the Lg C series as monitors.
Color brightness seems to be a huge issue with oled (even with qd-oled good color volume). colors just look muddy, lack of punchiness and contrast between different colors.
Yes the OLED can look completely lifeless and flat and its not a infrequent thing. Literally 60% of the content I consume results in ABL destroying the resulting image due to how dim it gets.
You mentioned Innocn 32m2v? It seems like a poor man's pg32uqx but I'm worried after seeing your Neo G8 since "not all mini-led" are created equal...
am i the only one here , look at the bright highlights too overblown lost detail and i mean a lot same with the dark higlights lost detail evrywhere its brighter and oles need some caching up but the mini led is too overblown in bright and dark highlights so its not ideal ither
This is just the camera due to the PG32UQX being so much brighter even when I handicapped it to just 1000nits. In person the highlights retain all their detail. I'm getting a new camera to better demonstrate these monitors.
It’s just camera . Filming in dark room .
The oled dim out zooms out . Cause vision blur .
the asus is nearly double the price, how is this even a comparison?
It’s not about the price . The video is trying to De bunk the Myth that (oled best ) in science program , our pHD professor spend last lecture explain the Plasma/OLED best is lie . They r inferior than LED. 😮 human eyes do NOT see things -- 3D by how black , but brightness n SHADEs of Color Density for survival . In jungle n animal . U need light !
Oled has dim n cloudy day visual , in real life , eyes will NOT pick up image as fast as LED if constantly moving , due to lack of brightness n peak highlight . Things appear -- zoom OUT further , vs come to eyes closer (POP) .
That’s why evey iPhone pro release , there is huge Brightness Jump on screen . U see better .
@@Yoga_Tv_buying For 1 m viewing Distance, 1000nits are plenty. I turn down to 500 on my oled. Also iphones dont get drastically brighter. From 1000 to 2000 is NOT 100% , because its logaritmic.
It’s all subjective. Your setting and everything make these side by side almost impossible to determine whether one is better than the other. Calibration is key in all of these examples.
i have an OLED and a mini LED display for an year, for comparison in movies, hdr or sdr, doesn't matter, oled always win. For me any technology than OLED will have like a little fog on the image, i don't know how to say in words what i see.
All consumer OLED tvs exhibit black crush. Monitors are even worse with both black crush AND poor EOTF tracking above shadow detail. OLED is only great for SDR.
You are just used to this overly contrasty image. Bad minileds also do this to be fair.
If you say you like OLED for the crisp motion, then fair enough. But for HDR it's no contest.
The mini-led is brighter, but look how washed out it. It looks like ass. Brighter does not equal better. I like having the ability to see the game's textures instead of seeing all that bloom. I could only imagine settings the PG32 to 1700 would only make it look even more washed out. Can't even see the details in the clouds.
It’s the other way around. I have this on my desk with two oleds and the most striking thing about it was realising how much detail was being lost in HDR scenes in things like clouds due to how dim they are. In SDR, the oleds wipe the floor with the PG32UQX, in HDR it’s the complete opposite and it’s not even close.
@@rcdarkangelQd-oled monitors? If you have those don't ever use the HDR 1000 mode, it's garbage.
@@verttisyrjala2897 Yeah, I got LG's first desktop sized WOLED, and next to that the Dell AW3225QF (the QD-OLED panel) and now finally, this PG32UQX. Sitting on my floor is the Samsung NeoG8, a real turd of a mini-led display that does OLED levels of sustained brightness at best.
Don't get me wrong, in purely dark scenes, the OLEDs smash, in literally everything else the PG32UQX is simply indescribable in what it does for HDR. I finally *get* HDR now, like I get why you would bother, too bad 99% of panels, including the OLEDs aint delivering that experience.
Its night and day in any scene beyond pure blacks with the PG32UQX. Its like looking through a window almost to a real place. I'm playing Ghost of Tsushima in HDR and the scenes with the rising sun, or the sun beating down upon a forest full of leaves are literally breathtaking.
Now I feel stuck between a rock and a hard place, because the PG32UQX has downsides, OLED has downsides, no new high performing mini-led displays are on the way, OLED is going to take years to get any reasonable level of brightness, so I feel like ive had a taste of "the good stuff" with no improvements to be seen for a very long time to come on the desktop, or even an equal.
Just in case; Yes the motion could be better (but its honestly fine) but its not even close to the OLED, and yes in some scenes, you will (or at least I do) notice blooming. This thing is so phenominal for HDR i'm willing to overlook both of those things because what it does best, no other display comes close too, they are not even in the same league let alone anywhere close.
Gonna keep the AW3255QF for games that purely employ darkness/a lot of blacks and for its good enough SDR performance. But referring to anything it does as "HDR" is a meme.
Related: NOT having VRR flicker, id just decided to *settle* and accept it on the OLEDs, but being able to actually use VRR and not have to suffer random flickering even in well performing titles, its the icing on the cake.
who are you and why are you whispering my left ear 😳
I know, its terrifying.
Awesome content bro. I'm your new subscriber ❤
Hi right neaw wat monitor will you recomand for hdr ?
Good video. Thanks. Kinda hard to see the difference on the phone screen. Prolly need to check them out in bestbuy if they have them on display. I kinda like my screens a little dim. I guess i got sensitive eyes. I guess thats why i really like oled. But i have never checked out mini led screens. Do you see any blooming on the asus in dark scenes?
Thank you. Yes I see blooming I think the blooming in dark scenes is acceptable given how bright it gets in every other scenario. Keep in mind that the blooming people recorded and documented in reviews when the Asus launched is not currently the case. It went through some firmware update or revision that completely changed how the local dimming behaves so it blooms far less now.
If your purpose to is to discuss brightness an LED is going to win. But that Asus is trash compare to QDOLED. You did not mention the much slower response times and input lag not as good. Also in dark games the QDOLED will show far more details. That ASUS is severely over priced and does not look as good in dark games over QDOLED. The bloom is awful for a monitor that is over 2K. OLED is SUPERIOR
I respect your opinion. Thank you for not watching the video.
Why are you so defensive?
Have to agree with the post. QD OLED is light years ahead of the asus led panel.
Using a VA mini-LED would be a better comparison, that much is true but you can stay coping about OLED being superior when you need a pitch black room just to be able to use it. Response times and input lag are irrelevant, you will never notice the 2-3ms difference between a good LCD and OLED. For competitive games TN is the best anyways.
Tell me without telling me you’ve never played with the UQX
And here we are another one that consider only the brightness, no black no constranst no instant response time an so on, only brightness, even in sdr and in dark room. Guys if you think the same do NOT buy a monitor just buy a lamp! Much cheaper and soooo bright!
You mentioned the innocn 32mv, how different is that compared to the asus since its is a more compelling budget option with similar specs? Would you choose the qd oled over the innocn?
The Innocn's local dimming is significantly worse and its even more smeary than the Asus in motion. For most people its probably just fine but those are 2 big cons other than the at times buggy behavior.
So, no review/comparison between your supposed LG 27GR95UM like you promised?
excellent insight
Glad it was helpful! Thanks
Just got the Samsung G6 OLED to replace my KTC M27T20 do you think I’ll be dissatisfied or disappointed
No, I think you'll be overjoyed by the lack of bloom and smoothness of 360hz which will outweigh the brightness advantage of the KTC. Let me know if this turns out to be the case when you setup the G6.
@@SolaceinScrutiny will do thanks for replying so fast
@@SolaceinScrutiny you were not joking this monitor blows the KTC out of the water, while In full screen brightness and some highlights the KTC did get slightly brighter. The colors and overall imagine quality is much better on the oled, plus the 360 hz and the low response time are icing on the cake.
@@JuanSanchez-ho4mg I have the same doubt, I currently have an AOC Q27G3XMN 350USD and I just ordered the G6 OLED at 680USD, I hope the jump is worth it, I will report back as soon as it arrives
@@DiegoCL30 let me know if it’s as big as I experienced, I was actually considering the AOC over the KTC when I was buying mini led, went with the ktc for its higher zone count
You said you tried the Innocn 32m2v and it didn’t compare to the Asus, could you elaborate more on how the Asus was better? I have the 27m2v which is significantly brighter than the 32m2v and has a lower response time, so maybe the 27m2v would better compare to the Asus in your video?
Also, why didn’t you compare w-OLED to the Mini-led at all? The w-OLED usually beats qd OLED in contrast and has less saturated colors. Could you show another video comparing your w-OLED to mini-led? Thanks
I though the same. I hava a Samsung G6 and an Oled. The change is good, buy brightnes is not. I think that people feel that change, that big cause jumpo from lcd IPS to an Oled. From VA with zone or mini led, to Oled, It feels great, but is not that big. At least in many scenarios.
you have convinced me to sell my aw3423dwf and get a pg32uqx in the near future
How do you find the SDR experience in windows to be on a mini-led monitor? Do you turn off the dimming zones?
On the PG32UQX, I don't mind it at all. Its super unintrusive. On other monitors like the Samsung Neo G8 and Innocn 32M2V, its a horrible experience using local dimming on the desktop.
@@SolaceinScrutiny Is it just the number of dimming zones that determine how not-annoying it is, or is it more complicated?
@@SolaceinScrutiny btw how is the Innocn 32M2V compared to the pg32uqx? i guess it is way worse?, its 500 euro now :=)
best regards
@@Steiwerddimming zones are identical to the Neo g8, so it comes down to algorithm.
Yeah I think its pretty terrible. On paper its a faster panel and it has similar zone count but it not only looks much blurrier in motion to me but the local dimming is really poor.
Tcl Mini LED 27R83U 4K UHD review. an opinion? please
As soon as its available I'll buy one to compare. Looks very impressive on paper but all of these mini-led monitors are at the mercy of their local dimming algorithms so even if it has 1100 zones and is capable of 1600nits, it means nothing if it crushes dark detail or the local dimming is inaccurate or slow.
@@SolaceinScrutiny its available in eu, but 900 euro :O
@@SolaceinScrutinyPeople are saying it's really good. Being VA with 4000:1 contrast already blowe any of the IPS options out of the water given equal amount of zones.