DreamWorks literally COPIED Pixar
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 เม.ย. 2024
- Decisions certain companies make turns out to influence the ones others make... who knew!
Shout out to Owen (Cubachoo1 on Roblox). He was an 8/100 actor that I found on craigslist.
Okay but seriously, who's gonna tell DreamWorks that they straight up stole a movie on accident? Maybe we should talk to Caleb first... maybe one day. - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
What annoys me most about Teenage Kraken is how everyone thinks she’s human when she is. _Literally_ . *Blue.*
NO!!! She's CaNadIan!!!
@@thejackcarlin lmao ofc
I always wondered why justin beiber is blue
What If They Have Power To Make Everyone See Them With Human Skin :P
DreamWorks did not just copy Turning red. They also copy Little Mermaid 2. I’m not joking.
And luca in a way
I never even thought about this lol. Probably cuz I haven’t seen it but it proves the point even more!
@@thejackcarlinRuby Gillman was also in production way longer than Turning Red.
Source?
@@thejackcarlin It was originally titled as Meet the Gillman’s in 2021, and some production art goes back to 2017.
Mei and her mom had more personality than Ruby and her grandma
lowkey... yup.
highkey... yup.
yep agreed and ming apologizes to meilin, meilin has more personality and Dreams about boys with her friends, while ruby has no personality and friends.
I’ve never even watched the teenage kraken. But i think it is literally the same movie as turning red, which is one of my fav movies.
Tbh turning red was just cringy teenage kraken was straight up bad
Nearly every DreamWorks films has copied Pixar and Disney since the beginning.
Boss baby feels like Toy Story written by family guy writers making their 1st PG movie.
Yeah, I can see a lot of Stewie energy in the baby
more like Boss baby copies family guy's stewie, well tim can understand his brother, but his parents can't, but everyone can understand stewie in family guy
and they keep talking about "oh everyone loves baby babies better than cats/dogs"
nearly no one things that this feels like they promoting childbirth with this movie
💀
My mom likes Ruby Gillman more, because she's more tame than Mei, but I adore Mei because of her quirks. She is so typical for her age, someone I wish I could have been at that age. So confident, happy, loud, awkward. I love her so much, and that is already without taking the panda into consideration.
Edit: I still do like Ruby Gillman, but the best thing is Chelsea to be quite honest!
I feel the same lol
Oh
What I love about major film companies is that when one company releases a really good film (Puss n Boots for example) everyone is like “omg they are the next best thing, they are the greatest company” and then release something like Teenage Kraken. Every company does this and it’s hilarious. Also great video your really underrated!
Ants and A bug life left the chat
Well you should note that the primary different is that those were full on BUILT to compete. Plus, they convey different themes if I remember correctly and follow different plots. This on the other hand is 2 different movies that are spread out just enough to make it kinda weird…
Finding Nemo and Shark Tale:
@@thejackcarlin im also pretty sure that antz came about a month before a bugs life
@@yohanesventurioananto2382 never thought of that one
@@yohanesventurioananto2382
Ratatouille: rat becomes chief
Flushed away: rat saves a city in the sewer
One's fighting the HR department and the other is fighting french frogs
Explain to me how they are the same
On an unrelated note I have noticed a pattern with American animation studios this decade:
2020:Pixar’s year.
2021:Disney’s year.
2022:
DreamWorks’s year.
2023:Sony’s year.
2024:Pixar’s year.
It helps that Zootopia 2 is coming in 2025
Oh god furries are gonna have a field day with this one.
@@LogersAndMogers i love zootopia and im not a furry
"Ruby Gillman" also borrows elements of "The Little Mermaid" (especially since Chelsea looks like the traditional Ariel & this movie was released the same year as the live-action remake), and someone pointed out that it also borrow elements of "Carmilla."
*Replace vampires with krakens & merfolk.
*The main villain tricks main character into becoming friends with them so they can get something that'll make them stronger.
*Villain goes under a false identity, and their true selves turn out to be a much older & bigger threat.
Of course the major differences between "Ruby" & "Carmilla" is tone of the relationships. In "Carmilla" there are heavy lesbian undertones because Marcilla/Carmilla is a vampire that only targets women as her victims;
While in "Ruby," Chelsea/Narissa was just gaslighting the next ruler of the Kraken kingdom to hand over Posidon's triton to her.
That's a good point! I never thought about The Little Mermaid when considering it, but I can only imagine that the similarities are there too. Thanks for pointing this out.
I honestly like both movies but I feel like Turning Red was more memorable and the message was more clear. And hey. Technically Ruby Gilman didn’t copy Turning Red since they started production one year before Turning Red. It was a coincidence that both movies with the same message released one year and then another
They were both pretty solid, and I do also agree that Turning Red had a much stronger everything in general.
if i had a nickle every time that dreamworks coppied pixar i would have 2 nickles
I assume the other nickel is for ants and a bug’s life
Shark Tale and Finding Nemo?
@@traviscunningham7062Other than both being about fish, those movies have nothing in common.
@@traviscunningham7062 both are way diffrent storys its not a copy
@@64KOs yeah
It’s been going on since 1998:
A Bugs Life vs Antz
Ratatouille vs Turbo
Toy Story 4 vs How to Train your Dragon the Hidden World
Inside Out vs Orion and the Dark
Cars3 vs Kung fu panda 4
All of these end up with the Pixar version being better. Pixar have a spark that DreamWorks simply don’t have.
Antz came out first and is far better than A Bug's Life. HTTYD3 Came out Before Toy Story 4 also.
Orion and the Dark had the potential to be good movie but nope, instead it became this weird hodgepodge that fumbled its own premise
why Cars 3 and Kung Fu Panda 4?
@@guloki I guess they both have a passing the torch plot point
A company has to be pretty low on idea when they copy Turning Red💀
I always see Ruby Gillman as the Dreamworks *equivalent* of Luca. They've been doing this since Antz and Bugs Life. Now they're doing it again recently with Wild Robot and Wall-E.
So far we have
A Bug's Life VS Antz
Monster Inc. vs Orion and The Dark
Finding Nemo vs Shark Tales
The Incredibles vs Megamind
Cars vs Turbo
Ratatouille vs Flushed Away
Wall-E vs The Wild Robot
The Good Dinosaur vs The Croods
Brave vs How to Train your dragon
Luca vs Ruby Gillman
Hercules vs Sindbad
Mulan vs Kung Fu panda
Emperor New Groove vs Road to El Dorado
Chicken Little vs Chicken Run
Meet the Robinson vs Mr Peabody and Sherman
Frozen vs Rise of The Guardians
Zootopia vs The Bad Guys
Wish vs Puss in Boot: The Last Wish
And I feel like Inside Out vs Me And My Shadow, Soul vs B.O.O, King of the Elves vs Trolls and Toy Story vs Alma would have been a possibility had those movies been released.
Just letting you know a lot of these dreamworks films did come out before the Pixar/disney film you compare them too. Also don’t compare the masterpiece that is Puss in Boots: The Last Wish to Wish because they both focus on a wish.
@@Luminous-722I mean that would mean that every movie that is about a wish is a copy of The last/Wish
You've gotta think about the difference between equivalent and similar (oh god 4th grade math memories).
The Incredibles and Megamind are yes, similar, because they're both superhero movies, yet the characters are different, the plots are different, they're actively produced at different times, characters follow different arcs, etc. Yes there are similarities, but just because they have some similar concepts it doesn't mean that they're equivalent.
I understand what your saying, but what I talk about in this video is how Teenage Kraken and Turning Red ARE very similar in that their themes, plot, characters, and many different details are all the same.
And also, if Wall-E was truly similar to The Wild Robot, people would've been blaming Wall-E for being similar to the book. So we'll see I guess.
@@thejackcarlin Also puss in boots the last Wish can't be a rip off to disneys Wish or the other way because the last wish came end of 2022 and Wish came in November 2023
@@Simbala-bq5vy Precisely! The closer movies are in production, the harder it is to not only make the movie, but the harder it is to actually get away with it.
Pixar: Turning Red
DreamWorks: Turning Red, but blue
Quite frankly, DreamWorks should be embarrassed for copying Pixar’s homework. That’s the biggest F that they deserve.
Do remember that these movies were in production at the same time. Nobody copied anyone, but it's a weird coincidence.
5:21
The Real Irony Is That Turning Red Feels More Like A DreamWorks Movie Than Ruby Gillman, An Actual DreamWorks Movie.
An unrelated note if Inside Out 2 and Elio actually ends up being good, Pixar might be picking itself back up
For Dreamworks I’m hoping Wild Robot is good, it sucks that Kung Fu Panda 4 wasn’t great
All it takes is one banger and a studio is back in the game!
Inside Out 2 is the movie to strike with... hoping for the best!
Pixar could theoretically rise...but I don't know about Disney themselves,they literally lost all of their trust after Wish
@@AllenTheAnimator004 Yeah Disney itself may not for a while at least unless Moana 2 or Zootopia 2 end up being good
Dreamworks has been doing this in some way ever since their first movie because Katzenberg was salty that he wasn’t aloud to make Toy Story edgy lmao
Edgy toy story woulda been pretty fire tho
ERM ACTUALLY
☝🤓
They did NOT start production at the same time,
turning red being developed/announced in as FAR BACK AS 2018 (the idea first being pitched in 2017, though) And coming out in 2022:
Luca Being announced/first in production in 2020 and coming out in 2021:
And ruby gillman: teenage kraken being released publicly in june of 2023, with only the cast being announced in 2023. Only other info I could find was that the IDEA of a kraken family was pitched in 2016, later transfering to dreamworks, and it was announced with a new title on march 16th 2023.
SO..
Its possible that 'ruby gillman teenage kraken' was in production before turning red and luca, but with Both of the movies being announced before them and soon after being RELEASED before them; its possible they tweaked the actual movie quite a lot, taking and taking elements from each of the other 2 movies, since they were doing SO WELL.
Not quite sure, just wanted to share some info! ^^
Edit: Switched up my wording a bit to make more sense, lol
Honestly thanks for looking into this stuff. It's really hard to tell when things start production, and better yet, what that actually means.
Like does the idea just come into existence?
Does planning start?
Plus if it starts too early, then by the time the movie comes out, then is it even similar to what was planned in the first place?
It's a really tough discussion. I just used the estimate that the movies took about 4 years to make start to finish.
That's really why I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean anything though. It's just kinda funny that the movies are that similar.
Also yes, they didn't start at the same time, but I see no possible way that they weren't at least being worked on at the same time.
@@thejackcarlin lol that was fast.
also Im glad ye found my comment, since I wanted to explain this stuff
I also get that they probably were worked on at the same time, I just wanted to let people know XD
Yeah I like to respond whenever I see it, but I happen to be at my computer rn so it works out.
Feel free to share some more anytime. There's always more to say about any topic so any other stuff added is pretty rad.
Not to mention the style of the animation and how the characters look are similar.
100% facts. I drew the thumbnail for this video and drawing them both on the same frame felt like I could just swap their colors and they’d look exactly the same. Mouth shape, eye shape, face shape, everything basically the same.
@@MilevProjects Exactly. Something tells me its not just an coincidence. Its plain copying.
I think Turning Red is underrated despite its flaws
This film on the other is probably Dreamworks worst film in a while it’s unfortunate Dreamworks films after this didn’t get better
I do think that the name itself kinda dragged it down. I mean… Teenage Kraken??? The heck were you thinking? Just say Turning Kraken or someth- wait
@@thejackcarlinExactly it’s name was kinda bad I actually prefer the original name “Meet The Gillmans”, on another note the trailer for Gillman gave away everything, Turning Red’s trailer didn’t give away a lot aside from the basics
Sounds like both are just extremely formulaic (doesn't mean automatically bad mind you).
Turning Red at least took risks and wasn’t afraid to tackle mature topics in a way that was still suitable for kids (the “controversy” over it was quite ridiculous and overblown).
Ruby just felt like a safe direct to DVD or a pilot attempt at a TV show.
Being both or more similar movie don’t exactly mean they’re ripoffs, but they can have some different themes too!
For example: Turning Red is land based and the protagonist is based on a fluffy mammal
Meanwhile, Teenage Kracken is sea based and the protagonist is based on a sea creature
Are you fucking serious?
@@lucasw1348 yes i am
@@emilyhopemeechem4183 Note that I made this comment before I found out that Ruby was in production first than turning red so...
You win the funniest reply award lol. That notification popping up on a teenage kraken video was the funniest thing i've ever seen lol
@@thejackcarlin Wait, me?
I agree with you. I never liked Ruby Gillman Teenage Kraken. I knew it was a copy of Turning Red but I didn’t realise it was also a copy of Luca. Sure they’re both underwater movies but they were some similarities I didn’t notice until now. Great video by the way.
What makes this even worse is that Luca and Turning Red are both one of my favourite Pixar movies, and here’s a message to DreamWorks. To quote Mr. Krabs: “I trusted you. And you gave me this.
They started by copying Disney, so it doesn't shock anyone
FINALLY SOMEONE SAID IT! I thought I was the only one who noticed!!
As a die hard fan of turning red
I REALLY WANTED TO LIKE GILLMAN
I really did...
But like..
The trailers spoiling the plot and the mediocre dynamics ruby has with others just didn't cut it for me 😑😐
Yet another reason to avoid trailers...
I get you tho. I kinda judged the movie really early on simply because of the awful title, but I was a little surprised at the quality, but it wasn't because it was great, it's because it wasn't as bad as I expected.
Ngl I kinda hated Ruby's friends the most. I don't know what it is but they just seem to be trying way to hard to be quirky and weird while Mei's friends just find joy in doing cringey things. Idk they just come off as more like an actual group of friends in middle school
This isn’t anything new, Dreamworks steals Ideas from Disney All the time. It’s kinda their thing 🤷♀️
ruby gillman was thought out years before turning red
@Ozzbim
Na, they were around the same time.
Sometimes it's inspiration, sometimes it's just coincidence, and sometimes it is stealing. At the end of the day, if the movie's good and doesn't feel like a blatant rip off, then who cares?
@@thejackcarlin ya think dreamworks knew turning red was concieved then? they're not disney/pixar insiders. they dont always know what's going on behind the scenes
@Ozzbim that bit at the end of the video was satire. That being said, if a company is able in anyway to get that info, I have no doubt that they’ll take advantage of it. That’s how capitalism works: competition.
But blue
Not ganna lie turning red is not even that bad of a movie
It’s more similar to Luca
Well I found far more similarities for turning red. I’m not sure if you watched the whole video but I also compare it to Luca so yeah 👍
@@thejackcarlin I thought so since they are sea monsters
"Son of a mustache"-Don Carlton
5:01
The concept for Ruby Gillman was thought out LITERAL YEARS before Turning Red.
He says that near the end of the video
I love you for this thank you for actually watching the video 🙏
@@thejackcarlin You're welcome! I thought the same thing when I watched Ruby Gillman.
The sad thing is that Ruby Gillman had so much potential (there was scrapped plot lines on TV Tropes that I feel would’ve massively improved the film) and after the huge success of Dreamworks’ two movies before it (Bad Guys and Puss in Boots 2) everyone, myself included believed Dreamworks was going to overtake Disney (and Pixar) as being in better shape as they had two flops the previous year. We all thought Ruby would be the hit and Elemental would be flop, only to find out the exact opposite happened.
What didn’t help either is according to TV Tropes is that the pitch for Ruby began in around 2015 but production didn’t begin until around 2020 only for COVID to disrupt production again. The film also was supposed to have Paul Tibbitt (known for being involved in SpongeBob) attached. Around August 2021 he was replaced by Kirk DeMicco, shortly after the release of DeMicco's previous film Vivo, when DreamWorks Animation wanted the project to take a different direction with 18 months left for completion with it finally being approximately finished in March 2023.
PS Wow, congrats at how many views this video has. I think this is your most viewed video yet? It appears to be miles ahead of your other videos (which definitely deserve more views as is, I find your videos quite funny, entertaining, and overall well made).
I do fully believe that each movie has potential. Like some movies have such dumb concepts yet still end up working somehow. One good example is the recent Wonka movie. I absolutely LOVE that movie. But on paper it's the stupidest thing ever. A Willy Wonka franchise addon except now we add in a cartel. That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard of... IM IN.
Also, I find the bit that the movie was directed by Kirk DeMicco super funny.
For Turning Red, Domee Shi had a deep personal connection to the character she was helping portray. It really just felt fitting to have a female director for a movie like Turning Red.
On the other hand, DreamWork's similar project was made by some dude named Kirk. I just thought it was super funny where compared. I'm not saying one director is better than the other, it's just that Domee really seemed to fit her project more lol.
both turning red and ruby gillman teenage kraken are both somewhat sexist only ruby gillman is not as bad because it represents nature (like the female black widow is bigger then the male) and turning red represents well... a girls period!
I asked my sister which which was better RGTK and Turning Red to which she immediately responded after watching both movies that that RGTK copied Turning Red
Remember, when everyone was like dreamWorks will surpass Disney because of Puss in boots oh boy, they were wrong….
Nah nice video, easily subscribed. Like quality for such a small channel. Keep up the good work!
I swear in the intro you were both just trying not laugh also good luck escaping dreamworks hopefully they dont force you to work on megamind 3: return of titan
You have no idea how many takes it took lmao
This wouldn’t be the first time
I noticed they are similar too. But I enjoyed Ruby gillman more then Red
They both super similar yet somehow totally different feeling. It's okay to like more than the other!
It would be interesting to see a series based on the movie Ruby Gillman.
Did not realize there was THAT many
Bro is so underated
I felt the same watching Ruby 😅 glad I'm not the only one who noticed
Either way, both were bad.
To each their own!
There not both bad, turning red focuses on teen girls going through a fase.Even Google who any other thing pointed towards it said that it's too realistic
@@fromthefuturefrenchi mb. What I meant to say they were both terrible
@@MugmanTheRealMug I feel like their both more ridiculous and goofy then terrible, one is a literal fish and the other turns into a red panda.
Do people not realize how long it takes to animate a movie? Let alone a 3D one? Sure they’re similar but there’s no conceivable way that Dreamworks could, think of a new plot, animate a whole 60min+ movie, find voice actors, and market the thing in a few months
Exactly what I’m saying! I’ve seen a lot of comments saying one thing or the other but I straight up say that these movies are in production at the same time so they likely didn’t copy each other. I might make a video about it lol
Finally someone pointed it out
this guy is cool asf how doesnt he have 1mil already?
gimme like....... two weeks?
HOW IS THIS NOT POPULAR
Just let the algorithm hit harder
This is why I FREAKING hate Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken!!!
When i first watched Ruby gilman after 20 minutes, i said okay this is just a ripoff of turning red, one of my favorite pixar movies
Happens to the best of em :(
As much as i love to say this, Shark Tale is a million times better than Ruby Gillman
You know I kind of agree with that statement.
Shark Tale isn’t really a good movie anyway looking back (I do have a soft spot for it as I watched it a lot as a kid) but at least I can have fun with it.
Ruby is just boring and forgettable for the most part. IMO that’s far worse ; a bland and forgettable movie over a bad yet entertaining film.
the resemblance is uncanny
Im mot gonna lie i thought based on the trailers i thought teenage kraken the humans were all fish people they were drawn so weird
I Noticed The Similarities When I Watched This In The Movie Too
See this is what I am trying to say they did copy Pixar and disney
Kinda.... they were in production at the same time, therefore, they didn't really copy each other, they were just eerily similar.
DreamWorks isn’t failing.. they made a masterpiece.
Shrek✨
But......
Wasn't Teenage Kraken in production before Turning Red...???
I thunk it was.
If I recall correctly, Ruby Gillman was pitched in 2015 and Turning Red was pitched in 2017.
What are your thoughts on current animation studio collapse
Well... I don't think they're really collapsing.
If a studio releases a movie, and it's bad, the immediate reaction is "Ope, this studio fell off!"
But the instant a good movie is made, viewers are often like "Ope, this studio is back baby! Can't go back now!"
This exact scenario was seen in 2011-2013. Pixar released Cars 2, Brave, and Monsters University all in a row. Although I think they're all pretty good movies, it didn't compare to their previous streak. That being said, the next year they made Inside Out which is often seen as one of the best Pixar movies.
Look at DreamWorks. Last year, they released Puss in Boots which essentially revived the studio. Before that, there hadn't been a revival since 2019's Httyd the hidden world. That being said, the stuff between wasn't bad either. There was The Bad Guys and.... well that's about it.
It's not a collapse of animation studios, it's the period of waiting for something great.
Also Pixar only makes one movie a year so they end up technically making less money than say Dreamworks which makes 2 per year which end up either being sequels or random unadvertised stuff.
@@thejackcarlin fair enough
You all don't know this but Dreamworks and Pixar had this whole copy war since their beginnings. Some of the people who worked on Pixar/Disney originally went to work with Dreamworks animators come and go to studio all the time now ideas this isn't anything new. Heres the movie copy line up.
Antz=Bug Life, pathetic ant main character who loves princess ant, and deals with bullies above them.
Shrek=Monster. Inc, monster renowed for their roars, then monster loves a female character, with a wise cracking sidekick.
Shark Tale=Finding Nemo, a fish whose reminded of their lowlife, and vegetarian sharks.
Flushed Away=Ratatolie, rats downed in a sewer wanting a higher life for themselves, while a fat rat takes advantage of them.
Turbo=Cars, racers wanting to win a champion cup but stuck in their miserable small town lives.
my personal favorite
How to train your dragon=Brave, both northern european teenagers who disagree with their culture norms, conflicts with their dominate parent, and end up fighting a giant monster at the end Red Death/Mordew.
Besides theres times Pixar copies other movies the Good Dinosaur from Land Before time, young longneck dino losing their parents, seeing their ghosts, making friends with T-rexes etc.
Toy story 3 takes heavily from Brave Little Toaster, both beloved items from their grown up owners leaving them, ended up in facilities that constantly remind them less of what they are, and an antagonist(Air conditioner/Lotzo) that has a mental breakdown while taking it out on the heroes, both heroes end up in a junkyard and reunited with their owners.
Other animated movies that take from others
Thief and the Cobbler/Aladdin, Rescuers down under/Fievel goes west, and Titan A.E/Treasure Planet just to name a few.
Underrated asf. good work!
Tysm 😊
I feel like Dreamwork went downhill after Puss In Boots 2.
i can't believe dreamworks basically copied four different movies: luca, turning red, the little mermaid, and the princess diaries
I think it's just a coinidence,movies take what? 4 years to make? and they came out a year apart from each other? I find it impossible for teenage karken to copy turning red,now if the movies are 4 years apart instead of a year,then yes it would have a bunch of questionable problems
5:12
DreamWorks has way more sequels than Pixar
Totally! I'm pretty sure they release 1 at least every year. Whether it be trolls, boss baby, croods 18, or some other random bs.
Do not bring up boss baby 2 to me
YOU HAVE LESS SUBS THAN ME
U GOT GOOD EDITING AND VOICE AND SKIT
IM SUBBING INSTANTLY YOU'RE AWESOME!!
i'm coming for you!! >:D
Welcome to the community
@@thejackcarlin WOO!
To be honest, even though I actually enjoyed "Trolls Band Together" very much, I feel like the middle section of the movie copied "Vivo," Sony Pictures Animation's first ever animated musical. Let me tell you why.
Not only did Dreamworks name Camila Cabello's character, Viva (which is also Spanish for life), but she also went through a similar character arc the same way the titular kinkajou from "Vivo" did. After reuniting with her sister, Poppy after years of being separated, Poppy says she has to leave with Branch and his brothers to go to Mount Rageous, save Floyd, and she offers Viva to come with her. But Viva does not take this well because she's afraid of leaving her home at the abandoned Bergen golf course, and she doesn't want Poppy to leave her again, so she tries to pursuade her into staying with her forever, but this attempt doesn't really go well until Poppy leaves her memory book on purpose so Viva could see it. Then Viva realizes the error of her ways once she meets Bridget and Gristle, and she comes with them to help Poppy, Branch, and the others take down Velvet and Veneer.
This feels so similar to "Vivo" because in the beginning of the movie, Andrés is so excited to go to Miami to see Marta Sandoval (his long-lost love) again so he could show her the song that he's written for her, but Vivo does not take this well because he's afraid of leaving his home in Havana, and that's because he spent most of his life there playing music with Andrés, but right after he comes to his senses and realizes that Andrés does need that trip, tragedy comes, so Vivo decides to go to Miami to bring Andrés' song to Marta himself (then he meets Gabi along the way).
I feel like Dreamworks also copied Sony because they did a similar character arc for Viva, but at least they did it differently.
Am I the only one who noticed this?
I haven’t seen this trolls movie for a few years now but the main thing is really this: if you like it, then it doesn’t matter that any of it copied anything. I just made this video to point out a similar overall plot along with themes.
Take MacBeth for example. MANY pieces of media have copied arcs very directly except in this case it works as a reference. The characters copying Macbeth are experiencing the same things as Macbeth himself.
It’s okay to copy media if it actually adds to a characters arc or at least changes the plot.
Nice observation too that looks solid.
@@thejackcarlin Thank you.
Dreamworks may have copied Disney, but Ruby Gillman Teenage Kraken was better than Turning Red.
I can argue that 😅
Good video. Gotta watch both, side by side, now.
Did I just found a jem with only 618 subscribers
🥹
the worse movie copys the worst movie(i swwear i hate both)
cartoon hater
@@eeveefennecfox i dont hate cartoons cause i like watching looney toons or flintstones so you can't be talking
I respect your opinion on Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken! 😁👍
Just because you use a similar ideas and characters from another movie doesn't mean you're copying them. Ruby Gillman and Turning Red may be similar, but they both have many ideas that have been used countless times, like an overprotective mom and someone who really wants to do something and has to figure out how to do it because they weren't allowed to by their parents. Both of these movies use common ideas that have been reused many times, so I don't think they're copying each other, or any other movie. They just happen to be very similar.
Yeah, when I saw Ruby Gillman in theaters, I found a lot of similarities between it and Turning Red. And while I think Ruby Gillman is great, I do prefer Turning Red (and Luca) over it (and I have currently seen Turning Red 12 times).
I think Turning red is a very cool movie. Tbh my favourite
Wow…
This is literally the definition of copying and pasting.
Even if they copied pixar..... I'd say they copied them, and made it better.......
Ruby Gillman>Turning Red,Luca.
Hottest take of the century right here
Lol this video is great, you deserve more subs
Tysm :D
Turning red was just so much better, in my opinion. It was actually memorable, tbh I can barely remember anything about Ruby Gilman
They copied both little mermaid and turning red holy s-
Turning Blue.
I remember the days when they didn’t copy disney
Call me paranoid but Turning Red is underrated as hell. The thing I cannot say about Ruby Gillman. Just my opinion:
*Turning Red*
I am Mei. I turn into giant red panda whenever I am overexcited. And I thought that is uncomfortable... But I managed to find the good side of this special trait of mine. I have awesome friends who always support me. Yes, I did choose my family over them when mom found out I lied to her... But they still cared about me and even looked after my tamagotchi! Plus I stood up for them later because I love them! My friends are so loyal to me that they asked our beloved band to save my mom with their singing. Firstly, my story is about to help you to find the bright side in your weaknesses. Secondly, my story is about to show you how great friendship is. Thirdly, the thing my mom hated about me is the very same thing that saved her, can you smell this great level of irony?))
*Ruby Gillman*
I am Ruby. Those are my mom and grandma. We, three mighty krakens, were not able to defeat the single pathetic mermaid without using our laser eyes. Why? She had the most powerful weapon in this universe... *THE FORK!*
hahaha exactly this. I seriously can't tell if the majority of people like Turning Red. Everyone I know that has seen it at my school absolutely hates it, but then others online and that I talk to about it either see it as meh or really good. It's such a weird topic. I however, after a butt ton of analysis, have found out that it's actually pretty dang good.
I think the main reason people hate Turning Red is because of so-called "cringe" moments. But that is the whole point. Mei feels really uncomfortable when Ming just takes the spotlight and makes a show out of any situation her daughter gets into. Mei feels this cringe. And if we feel this cringe too, then Pixar did nothing wrong
@@just_a_little_rat you’re not gonna believe me but I made a video about this exact topic 😊
I can’t remember exactly what I said cuz I made it a while ago but you should check it out.
th-cam.com/video/6A4uY0sI9tg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=zVRetGB6Hh_c1YMH
Sure, I will
“And we saved the day with mAtH!!111!”
No shit. That's the reason the company exists. To rip on Disney. That's what they did until about 2010.
I disagree, more likely there both responses to the little mermaid controversy that came about during the time it started development.
How exactly did they respond?
Woman don't need no man.
I'm partly joking as I do like them both, but I feel like that's turning into a theme of our era.
Honestly, saying Ruby Gillman is a Turning Red ripoff is like saying The Lego Movie is a Toy story ripoff.
Never said it was a rip off, just pointing out the fact that they're similar.
There's a difference between similar concepts and extremely similar plots and characters.
@@thejackcarlin You did say in the title that DreamWorks copied Pixar and yes they have done that before with antz and they do share some similarities. But to me it copied more from the little mermaid than TR, Turning Red wasn’t really original either though. Ever heard of Michael Fox’s Teen Wolf?
I’m not hating on Turning Red btw, I like both films.
Ya know that’s a fair point. That being said, I couldn’t really title it any other way that would be compelling at all.
“Dreamworks made a similar movie to Pixar”
@@thejackcarlin I feel yah, I’m not good at saying things more lightly either.
Even if it wasn’t copied i think turning red is still weird its like microsoft saying lets follow what nintendo is doing and add something from the nintendo switch onto the new xbox
Luca's mom 😩
Gulia's dad :weary:
DreamWorks didn’t have the guts to actually talk about female body functions. Points go to Pixar.
to be fair, they used it for comedic relief lol
To be honest I actually like Ruby gillman teenage kraken more than turning red hope ruby gillman gets a tv series soon
(Random) 4:18 I have that Lego Up house set!
isnt that guy from chucky
Wow… just wow…
lol I thought I was the only one who noticed this
Dream works copied everything
Unpopular opinion all dreamworks movies are bad
Popular opinion, I hate your existence
No stop it they didn’t
They’re both dead at this point tho lol
Ruby is actually better then Turing red
No contest
HOT TAKE ALERT 🚨 🚨🚨🚨
@@thejackcarlin
Do you want a even hoter take
Hit me with it
@@thejackcarlin
Hoter take
turning Red is the worst Pixar film and one of the worst major animated film ever