Analysis is not the way | J. Krishnamurti
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
- SUBTITLES AVAILABLE IN: ENGLISH
Analysis is not the way | J. Krishnamurti
Extract from the second talk in New York, 1981.
---
This channel is managed by the Krishnamurti Foundation Trust, UK, and by the Krishnamurti Foundation of America.
The role of the foundations was described by Krishnamurti when he said, 'The foundations will see to it that these teachings are kept whole, are not distorted, are not made corrupt. They will not give rise to any sectarian spirit in their activities... nor create any kind of place of worship around the teachings or the person.'
We maintain extensive archives of Krishnamurti's original works and all four Krishnamurti foundations are actively engaged in the publication of material in various forms.
Our videos contain thousands of subtitles in more than 25 languages, translated by volunteers from all over the world. If you would like to help us with translating subtitles, please contact us at digital@kfoundation.org
For more information about J. Krishnamurti and the Krishnamurti foundations:
International Site - www.jkrishnamur...
Facebook - / jk.krishnamurti
Twitter - / orgkrishnamurti
Krishnamurti Foundation Trust, UK - www.kfoundation...
Krishnamurti Foundation of America - www.kfa.org/
Krishnamurti Foundation of India - www.kfionline.org/
Fundación Krishnamurti Latinoamericana - www.fkla.org/
This organization is a registered charity. Registered charity number: 312865
© 1971 Krishnamurti Foundation of America
![Megan Thee Stallion - Neva Play (feat. RM) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TpYTyAaTRts/mqdefault.jpg)
In his talks, K has no ego. The way he says 'don't laugh', which many teachers would somehow enjoy, speaks volumes
When you actually matter to a person, they'll make time for you. No lies, no excuses.
And to stand completely alone -it doesn't matter if one matters to a particular person or not.
Master krishna is not talking, it is intelligence what is talking.
He's basically saying, be in the moment, with the moment.. accept the moment, not say it should be this or that..
And don't try too hard to understand this, you won't understand this it'll just gradually become your habit if you keep on listening to jk.
So, chill once you've started with k, sit back and relaxed you'll end up being completely awakened.
Thank you 🙏🏽 sooooo much, beloved Krisnaji❤ I needed this today here and now ❤ We can only be in peace with what is by heart ❤️ we will die analyzing
You are an important teacher of mine through all these years and times and realms. You said: negate everything but Love ❤️
That’s what I do I appreciate your beautiful being
Awesome
Thank you so much for your teaching sir 🙏🙏🙏❤
Jk the greatest
To be honest, I feel In Bhagvad Gita, Krishna conveys the same thing to Arjuna when he's getting hesitant before the battle (after analysing the possibilities of his actions)
Yeah, what K here focuses on is intuitive action based on insight.
Arjuna was in conflict. He was analysing and what Krishna gave is nothing but advice.
Here jk is saying if you have an insight then that is the action and it will clear the conflict. If Arjuna had an insight then he would have stopped the war and would have observed he is repeating the action from his memory.😊
To look at the tree as if for the very first time, as a child would.
🙏❤🌻
🙏🏻
Death is not the way (Analysis Is Your Communication)
K has his own ego when he is using words to communicate, he has never denied it.
Really? Where can I find such statement? Give me one example.
Without an ego body you cannot exist physically, it's your conduit to experience this reality. But your ego is too busy trying to analyze someone else.
Look at the object without the image🤔the observer is the image, between both is “ time “ which is also the observer but… how could mind see this whole thing at once without analyzing. Does image making process ever cease. Interesting…
This happens Outside of the 'i' box........in Space , there is no Duality , there is only Singular OBSERVATION..
What happens with the 'image making process' when there is pure observation? In that observation there is no 'observer', which is the product of cognition, thougt. The brain itself observes, using its full capacity. That observation is a holistic precognitive process, which humans share with all vertebrates that we are related to.
The question is whether it's possible to observe without the observer which is also the analyser. There is only one way to find out and that is through that observation, without any cognitive bias and see what happens...
Full video???
th-cam.com/video/cl93xw5F3cI/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=J.Krishnamurti-OfficialChannel
The Present observer looks at the Past observer and the Future observer(foreseeable) at the same time.
Can you look NOT ONLY at ________, without the Past Image of _________? Yes, you overlay it with the Present Image and try to look at the Quality of Time(Space) that brings the change from the Past Image to the Present Image. Then you move towards or away from the Tree, and then you estimate movement of the Past, Present, and Foreseeable Image of the Tree and take the Observation (Picture) of the Tree at different positions and movements. Sometimes you Zoom out to see the complete Tree in its totality, but sometimes Zoom in to see the parts that make up the Tree, like Leaf, Flower, Birds, etc. The key is movement, and action for the Analyst.
Without analysis, how can there be discernment? Feels like a fools game to operate without discernment on ALL levels of this reality and consciousness. I would suggest to you that the foundation of consciousness is awareness itself. As awareness broadens, consciousness tends to expand with it. Without awareness, can there really be 'consciousness'? I think awareness is nested within consciousness, the same way a heart is nested within the human body. What he mentions as 'contents of consciousness' seem to be things that fit within the confines of awareness. Experiences, memories, beliefs, perceptions and knowledge all become part of awareness. Expansion of awareness through experience or learning that gives rise to more knowledge, generally leads to more or perhaps a broadening of consciousness. Consider someone you've seen that functions just above waking consciousness (they're everywhere) vs. someone that's very consciously awake, self aware, spiritually aware and learn'ed. Fair to say there are vast differences in the 'consciousness' between the 2, along with the 'content' of the consciousness. That may not be all of the equation of consciousness, but it's a fair piece of it.
All your past,memories, dreams are in the human consciousness. Through pure awareness (attention), you can break the connection with consciousness and be free.
But remember, the 'you' represents consciousness.
So, attention is above human consciousness and can be called as pure observation.
If J K speeches are not the way why he is speaking at the first place
Krishnamurti, l'homme qui dissout son propre mouvement par refus absolu du business, de l'argent et de la combinaison des deux, le charity business ! Faire une telle conférence à NY ne manque pas d'humour. C'est un peu expliquer à un obèse qui mange pour "struggle" contre son obésité qu'il ne devrait pas manger du tout et que la vérité est ailleurs. Sachant que cette conférence est réalisée en 1971 et que le capitalisme totalitaire anglo-saxon s'est déchaîné par la suite dans un saccage et un sans limite inouïs, tout ceci donne un vertige insupportable notamment en ce qui concerne le rayonnement effectif d'un tel discours dans les intelligences même si l'audience est prompte à rire, nerveusement certes, mais en forçant l'impression démonstrative qu'elle comprend et adhère, j'allais dire, à l'américaine... Mais en fait, qu'est ce qu'un anglo-saxon peut bien parvenir à faire de toute cette vérité au final ? Et finalement aussi tout le reste de l'inhumanité...?... Imbibée qu'elle est de l'inverse absolu de l'enseignement de Krishnamurti...
Como decía álgun maestro zen antiguo. Se necesita sed de absoluto
Thank goodness it's in French.
Us Anglo Saxons can happily dismiss it.
😂😂 still old ideas and old people