Is Paul a TRUE Apostle or FALSE Teacher?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ม.ค. 2019
- Some people are saying that Paul was a false apostle and that he taught people not to obey God’s commandments, but is that really the truth? Some people believe Paul was a real apostle, but think he taught contrary to the law of God and they use his words to nullify the commandments in the Torah. Other people also think Paul taught against the Torah, and because of this, they label him a false apostle. However, I believe both of these groups are in error concerning Paul.
Visit my website: www.unlearnthelies.com
Support UNLEARN: www.patreon.com/unlearnthelies
Usually questions like this can be answered by simply reading the text for yourself and not trying to nitpick to support one side or the other. Always read the entire chapter and not just a verse or two. If you can't remember the specific verse to refute the person in error, go find it before trying to debate them. Otherwise you might end up in a fruitless quarrel with both sides misrepresenting the word.
Honestly you make alot of sense you can make the bible say what you want by cherry picking.
99% of the lies are a direct result of Saul (shaul-sheol) or "paul" (appolyon) all abrahamic "religions" would be One Way . . if he didnt fool (if it were possible) even the elect.
@@ivanfourie You will have a point if he wasn't Chosen by Jesus Christ and turned from a serial and brutal persecutor of the Christians to a devout follower of Christ.
Ask yourself, what did he stand to gain? He was already a great and terrifying figure in the society then. He then died a Martyr for the Lord Jesus Christ. He was beheaded. Would you die for a lie?
Read the WHOLE of Paul, not CHERRYPICKED verses which you don't understand.
@@steelisrael3461 I will admit that every single time somebody quotes that we should be lawless, from Paul's teachings, all that I have to do is read a few chapters further and it comes into context. He's not simply against the law. He's very much For The Law for those who don't know the law through Christ. If I'm saying that correctly.
@@sipandsynoptics RIGHT!!!! people see one scripture and take out the bible and shove in your like SEE SEE SEE but dont read a passage before that or further down
I am a disciple of Master Yeshua Messiah. I receive the instructions of Yah as both authoritative and instructive in my life. At the same time, over 100 of the instructions cannot be obeyed because there is no longer a temple and we are no longer under the Aaronic priesthood. There are two great instructions to love Elohim and to love our neighbor. After that, the 10 instructions teach us how to love. From there, there are hundreds of instructions that define both love and lifestyle. As we grow spiritually, Our love and lifestyle should look more and more like Yeshua since he is the word that became flesh.
IronDisciple X well said!
John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.*
John 7:17 If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.
_In John __7:16__ Jesus testified that his doctrine was not his own, but [God's doctrine]._
_So when Jesus gives us the doctrine of the "great commandment" he is giving us God's doctrine._
Matthew 22:36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
Matthew 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with *all thy heart, and with all thy soul,* and with all thy mind.
Matthew 22:38 This is the first and great commandment.
Matthew 22:39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Matthew 22:40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
_Notice the wording within the [first] great commandment; (... _*_love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul,_*_ ...)_ _and notice that this exact phrase has already been recorded and established as a doctrine within the old testament._
_Example of what it means to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul._
Deuteronomy 13:3 [...] for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye *love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.*
Deuteronomy 13:4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, *and keep his commandments,* and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
_Example of what it means to love God._
Deuteronomy 30:16 In that I command thee this day *to love the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments,* that thou mayest live [...].
_Deu 13:3-4 & Deu __30:16__ coveys the message that to "love the LORD your God {EVEN} with all your heart and with all your soul" means to "keep his commandments,* and obey his voice" & "to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments."_
_Please remember that Jesus testified in John __7:16__-17_
John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.*
John 7:17 *If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.*
_Now please notice in Luke __10:25__ a lawyer's question to Jesus is; "...What shall I do to inherit...?"_
Luke 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, *what shall I do to inherit* eternal life?
_This question "...What shall I do to inherit...?" is very much like asking; ...What is required of me [to inherit] ...?_
_And this question had already been addressed by God's doctrine, within the old testament in Deu __10:12__-13._
Deuteronomy 10:12 And now, Israel, *what doth the LORD thy God require of thee,* but to fear the LORD thy God, to walk in all his ways, and *to love him,*
and *to serve the LORD thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul,*
Deuteronomy 10:13 *To keep the commandments of the LORD, and his statutes,* which I command thee this day for thy good?
_Now again looking at Luke __10:25__ the man's question is first addressed by Jesus in this manner; "... _*_What is written in the law?_*_ ..._
_We know that when Jesus says "What is written in the law" would be referring to something already recorded. As God's doctrine had already recorded in the old testament._
_The man goes on to say; "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul..." which is indeed written in the old testament._
Luke 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, *Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?*
Luke 10:26 He said unto him, *What is written in the law?* how readest thou?
Luke 10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
Luke 10:28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
_We can read nearly the same situation (question and answer) again in Mark __10:17__-19._
Mark 10:17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, *what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?*
Mark 10:18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
Mark 10:19 *Thou knowest the commandments,* Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother.
_In Mark __10:17__ a person asks Jesus, "...what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?_
_In Mark __10:19__ Jesus states; "Thou knowest the commandments..." (Note that the commandments were known by the man because they are already written, in God's doctrine, in the old testament.)_
_In Mark __10:19__ Then Jesus began to recite from the Ten Commandments, which are the words of the covenant. (God's covenant / God's doctrine.)_
John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.*
John 7:17 *If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.*
@aMTBer As Jesus taught in John 7:16 [...] *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.*
Jesus is quoting from God's doctrine the ten commandments. And
per Exodus 34:28 the words of the covenant are the ten commandments.
Exodus 34:28 [...] And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.
Jesus is making reverence to God's doctrine which would include _all_ the words of the covenant, not just part of the words of the covenant (which are the ten commandments.)
_It is possible_ that the man already knowing all the commandments interrupted Jesus with his reply (Mark 10:20) ...all these have I observed from my youth.
And _it is possible_ that at that time period with the Jews who studied and followed God's words, that when someone made reverence to a scripture, it meant all of that scripture and all the scriptures around pertaining to it.
For example many people are puzzled why Jesus would have stated (while on the cross) My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Matthew 27:46)
However when one reads Psalms 22 you will see within the very first verse it reads, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Palms 22:1)
As one continues to read through the verses one comes to Psalms 22:16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: *they pierced my hands and my feet.*
Thus if indeed Jesus' doctrine is not his but his that sent him then he is indeed making reference to the book of Palms 22 while making the statement, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
Also you post that to your understanding the 7 day Sabbath is still valid. The Sabbath day commandment is part of the words to the covenant and the _only_ commandment that starts with the very word "remember." It is as thou God is telling us that he foreknew that many men will teach others that this commandment you can forget.
Matthew 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen.
John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _and_ they follow me:
_In John __10:27__ the word "and" by Strong's Concordance is _*_G2532_*_ which also can mean; _indeed, moreover, so, therefore._
Thus this verse could read or mean;
My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _indeed_ they follow me:
My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _moreover_ they follow me:
My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _so_ they follow me:
My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _therefore_ they follow me:
*God's sheep will hear God's voice and follow him.*
The ten commandments listed in Exodus 20. The very first verse reads Exodus 20:1 And God spake all these words, saying,
Again; *God's sheep will hear God's voice and follow him.*
John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _and_ they follow me:
@aMTBer Revelation 22:14 *Blessed are they that do his commandments,* that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
I don't know anything about that. All I know is Jesus, and him crucified (1 Corinthians 2:2) . All this other mumbo jumbo is some sort of wacky stuff to convince people to abandon the true faith that is built upon our savior Jesus Christ. Nope. Not today, Satan. Not ever!
To everybody who get sort of angry: my post was a question, just that.
To everybody who answers kindly: thank you for letting us learn.
Blessings
" For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."
(Galatians 5: 14).....PAUL
But Jesus said
" Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” Mathew 22:36
That right there proves Paul IS FALSE
@@andreawimer4334 You are perfectly right!
@@andreawimer4334 how so?
@@watchmenoftruth5238
2024 vs 2022:
2024: The writings of Paul are not against other scriptures, but our understandings and translations.
2022: Yes! It's really hard to swallow.
*Paul contradicts many areas with the teaching of the Messiah, I don't understand why?*
Did Paul really deceive or not?.
*Anyway, I don't follow anyone who contradicts the whole idea of the scriptures at least in some points*
@@watchmenoftruth5238 whats your facts? Do you even know what Gnostic teaches apparently you don't? Gnostic teachers utilize Paul's writings to prove their point.
Christian churches quote Paul a lot and use his writings completely out of context.
I've noticed that many people use the"context trend " to make themselves sound like they know what they are saying.
You are absolutely right.
With Love n Respect. I've heard a lot of CHRISTians talk more about the words of men over The Love Blessed to us All by Our FATHER. Love n Blessings Family!!!
Steve Tassi yes they do, I would say, if you don’t understand it, don’t speak against it🙏
It's impossible to use Paul in context. He is double-minded and duplicitous.
People ignore this:
1Co 9:20 KJV - And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1Co 9:21 KJV - To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
Paul did and said whatever was _necessary_ to win people to HIS Gospel.
Interestingly, Gamaliel instructs them to leave the apostles alone, for if they are not of God, the movement will die out. See Acts 5:34-39. But Paul does not heed Gamaliel’s words and vigorously persecuted the believers.
That's a bright idea a win win situation, for a while.
Gamaliel is the Master of Law.
After that, they requested to the apostles not to teach the name of Messiah.
See how they manipulated the situation.
He was chossen to make him suffer, not apostle.
So because Paul said he saw Jesus that makes him an apostle and everything he said the new rules? Wouldn't the same rule then apply to anyone that says that?
zam iel You shall know thrm by there fruits
Might as well believe in Islam or Mormonism if you take every new “prophets” twist on religion as true.
By the way brother. Who was YESHUA referring to as a false apostle in the book of revelation whose teaching was rejected by the Ephesians that YESHUA commended them??? Pls. Reply.
Charles Aaaron Te UM 😐 SHAUL OF TARSUS..... many forget he was sent to the Nations’ aka heathens...
Ben Yisrael Sha’ul was the WOLF 🐺 and his Spirit is Alive and Well in Secular Church Shepherds, ALL TEACH FROM ‘HIS’ GOSPEL which is clearly of Another.
YAHUSHA’s was TRUTH because HE is the WAY, the ‘TRUTH’ and the LIFE!
Shalom Brother 🙏
@Sandra Novoa-Keller
This you know, that all who are in Asia turned away from me; of whom are Phygelus and Hermogenes. May the Lord grant mercy to the house of Onesiphorus, for he often refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain, but when he was in Rome, he sought me diligently, and found me (the Lord grant to him to find the Lord’s mercy in that day); and in how many things he served at Ephesus, you know very well.
2 Timothy 1:15-18 WEB
... Paul was facing a second imprisonment in Rome, and others had forsaken him because of it. That's why he points out how Onesiphorous was not ashamed of his chains, and exhorted Timothy to be courageous in suffering for the gospel in chapter 2.
If you knew this already please let me know because I'm not trying to insult your intelligence.
John wrote the whole book of Revelations and Saw way more than Paul did,,
John saw & Spoke to Angels,
said he saw Yahshua on the Throne,,
Talked about beginning and last day prophecey,
Saw the Lamb go to the One that Sat on the Throne,,
Yahshua spoke to John all the way through ,.
Why nothing bad to say About John ??
John does not talk about circumcision .. That is why they have nothing to say about John.
@Sandra Novoa-Keller all of Asia was not saved. He's referring to the church specifically in Ephesus. It's like saying all of judea rejected Yeshua, which is false.
Acts “1:26 And they gave their lots. And the lot fell on Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.”
Revelation “21:14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.”
So who was Paul?
@SwordOfYHWH - Interesting. But if the Apostles failed in their mission to spread the Gospel to the world, why did Jesus acknowledge them in Rev 21:14? And why did Jesus stick to the number 12 and not acknowledge Paul?
So Jesus went behind the backs of the Apostles and instead appointed another Apostle (Paul). It is uncharacteristic of Jesus to not first rebuke the original Apostles if indeed they had failed. Hmm it doesn't add up.
@Acts 2:38 ah yes, proving Paul with Paul... classic.
Apparently the Greek word apostolos means “one who is sent off”
@@Hebrew42Day Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.
@@Hebrew42Day yeah. That is hilarious
How do you reconcile Matthew 5:17-19 with romans 10:4 and ephesians 2:14 where Paul says that Jesus is the end of the law and that Jesus abolished the commandments on the cross, respectively?
Jesus is the goal of the law. Check the Greek word there. And He abolished the penalty for breaking the law, not the law itself. Hope that helps a bit :)
Yeshua fulfilled the law. Paul just emphasizes that.
What does fulfill mean?
If by the age of 12 he could quote the whole tanach, how come he consistently misquoted scripture??
You so correct. It is highly impossible for a twelve-year-old to know the whole Jewish Bible
If Paul was preaching what the Torah say why would he be having so many problems with the rabbis and teachers of the law
The Jews know their bible
Would you explain what is mandela effects
Would you please read and edit your statement and explain what is a Mandela effect? Are you saying Jesus is false and paul is right. Please clarity. Thanks
Where is your ministry location?
The reason most people who are against obeying YHVH use the writings of Paul to "allegedly" prove their point(s) IS BECAUSE of what Peter said, and Peter said SOME of Paul's epistles ARE HARD TO UNDERSTAND! BUT!! Peter ALSO said only the "unlearned and unstable" TWIST the meaning of what Paul said and meant. SOooooo the DECEIVERS FILM FLAM people into believing THEY are HIGHER THAN HIGHLY LEARNED AND THEY UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT Paul meant. For EXAMPLE, it is written in pertinent part, Romans 6:14, > We are not UNDER the LAW......."
The deceivers say that means we are no longer required to OBEY the Law of YHVH. < BUT I KNOW THIS!! ANY LAW to be a valid law has 2 aspects. ONE is the command itself AND the other aspect is the PENALTY attached for disobeying the first aspect. SOooooo what Paul MEANT IS, Those who OBEY the law of YHVH ARE NOT UNDER THE PENALTY ASPECT. AND!!! The penalty ASPECT of disobeying the LAW of YHVH IS, the 2nd death penalty, < THAT IS THE LAW WE ARE NOT UNDER IF WE OBEY THE FIRST ASPECT!
Great answer. Remember to be as accurate with their names also YHWH and it is Yahuwah. And the Messiahs name is Yahuwshuwa = Yahuwah is salvation. In the same way Matthew's name is Matityahuw and John's name Yahuwchanan
No one can understand Paul, he is duplicitous and a wolf.
Peter isn't warning us to be careful, but marking and telling us to AVOID his writings.
@@Hebrew42Day If this is your stance Elwood, that Paul is a wolf. Are you telling people that they should not read the book of Acts because it is false? Because both 2 Peter and the book of Acts clearly embrace Paul? If that is the case, it means that you are ripping out all the writings of Paul, the book of Acts and 2 Peter and creating your own doctrine? I am asking you this respectfully, because it seems like you just typed those letters out emotionally without calculating what that implies.
@@yisraelsveryown3932 Peter's condemning Paul in the Greek.
The "beloved brother" and "scripture" confuse people, a tool of the enemy.
All the way back to Eusebius, the "church" felt 2 Peter 2 was _attacking_ Paul as the other brother stated.
Search out the history of the Canon. Even from what we call the New Testament. Does "scripture" referenced by new testament writings ever self refer to itself?
They call it the law, or the law of Moses, the prophets and the writings.
The first two have the highest authority and are referenced more often.
The writings have the lowest authority, and this is the word Peter uses for Paul's "writings" - they are "graphe".
If Peter was referring to the "rest of scriptures" he would have said, the law and the prophets.
Peter was referring to *all* of Paul's writings as employing human wisdom, circular reasoning and painful to read. (Look at the Greek)
That's why men like Calvin wanted it removed from Canon.
@THINK FOR SELF Wow, excuse me but this is so unlearned, so unstable and wicked. I pray in Yahuwshuwa the Anointed One's name that the Father may take away your blindness, show you His salvation and let the set apart Ruwach (Spirit) guide and lead you into all truths. It's mind blowing knowing the scripture and seeing what you have written. THE 3 VERSES IN 2 PETER:
15 And account that the longsuffering of our Master is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, WHICH THEY THAT ARE UNLEARNED AND UNSTABLE WREST(DISTORT), AS THEY DO ALSO the OTHER scriptures, unto THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION.
17 YE (you) THEREFORE, beloved, SEEING YE KNOW these things BEFORE, BEWARE LEST YE ALSO, BEING LED AWAY WITH the ERROR of the WICKED, FALL from YOUR OWN STEADFASTNESS.
You see? We are even warned to beware of the error of the wicked! Beware of who? The wicked! Those who distort Paul's writings.
As Saul drew near to Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. 4He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me?”
5“Who are You, Lord?” Saul asked.
“I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,a ” He replied. 6“Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”
7The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless. They heard the voice but did not see anyone. 8Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could not see a thing. So they led him by the hand into Damascus. 9For three days he was without sight, and he did not eat or drink anything.
That is only ONE version of the story. He tells it several ways in other accounts. In law enforcement, that is how they know someone is lying.
There are three accounts of Paul's conversion in the book of Acts-Acts 9:1-19a , 22:1-21 , and 26:9-23.
They are very different from each other. Go read them.
@@annajustice7620If Acts is errant, then how can we also trust the Gospel of Luke, given that they were written by the same person? Also, Peter claims that Paul’s writings are Scripture. Was Peter lying? Can he be trusted? Can ANY of Yeshua’s apostles be trusted, according to you?
I have a question. I was wondering what bible do you use? And what are your thoughts on the apocrypha books?
I typically read from the NKJV, but I use several different versions for study. The Apocrypha is interesting, but not Scripture.
UNLEARN the lies well what are your thoughts about the mention of them in the 66? The version that I use is the Ethiopic and it includes Jubilees, Jasher and Enoch.
UNLEARN the lies How is the apocrypha not Scripture? Joshua 10:13, and 2 Samuel 1:18 as well as in the the New Testament the book of Jasher is mentioned. Also prophecy in the book of Jude that he mentioned from Enoch is not in the 66. Can you explain how those books are not Scripture? There are also many more scriptures mentioning the apocrypha books.
Lex I understand what you are saying but I'm still confused on Galatians. Do you have a video on Galatians and how to understand it? That has me really confused, because I'm just coming in to following the Torah and Galatians has made me think maybe not??? Help!
_It should be noted that Jesus of course would have known about Paul even before Paul came._
_And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_
John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.*
John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.*
_The person of Jesus' prophecy in John__14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._
_Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_
_But why didn't Jesus tell the his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._*
Please note the following:
_Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._
_Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_
_Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_
_What Paul teaches in Galatians:_
Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;*
Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
_(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_
Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.*
_(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_
_According to Paul; Peter was [given by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_
_Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._
_And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._
_I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._
_This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._
*_If anyone disagrees perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._*
_Moreover:_
_Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_
Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;*
Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
_(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_
_And while Jesus was not talking much with them (John __14:28__-30) Paul makes this claim about himself in Romans __11:13_
Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office:
_(However, before Paul came and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples, Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_
Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.
Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted.
Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen.
_(In Matthew __28:16__ is concerning the now remaining 11 disciples.)_
_(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” All nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_
_More in Mark:_
Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.
Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.*
Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
_(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_
_And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen.
_The teaching that Peter was to preach to a different group of people is directly against, and is contrariwise to what Jesus told his disciple while he was with them and talking much with them. The contrariwise teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul during the exact time that Jesus is not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._
*Brother, you didn't check their points regarding Paul's teachings which sometimes opposing the scriptures.*
Paul shouldn’t be judged on how Christian Theologians have mis-represented his words to make them appear to support their antinomian beliefs. Great job as always Lex!
Yes he should. So do apologetics ^^^^ who justify christian warmongering
Paul is difficult to understand. His words are like pinning down jello. He seems to change colors like the lizard that does that. Sorry don't know how to spell it. Some times he states specific sins and people that do them will not inherit heaven. Other places he states if you keep the law grace will do no good. But we all have read he cleared with the original disciples that gentiles did not need to be circumcised. God said that 'would be an everlasting sign for his men.' So yes he did oppose God and his commandments. His message is really the same as the serpent in the garden of Eden. "You don't have to obey God, You will not die". This has nothing to do with Paul but go into any church and look at the faces of the men. Is there anything wrong? In our culture a man is looked on as unclean if he is not clean shaven. Actually God said "My men will have beards, and don't be like the idolaters and shave the corners".
You can look at them from 200 yards away and tell they are not men of God or they would obey him. Go ahead read your Bibles. Read, read and read and then throw God's words to the ground out of rebellion. It would be better to not read and remain ignorant than to rebel against God.
@@wadejones4791 I know it's a longshot but do you live in Washington state?
@@godwinz9925 No I'm in Kansas. Why did you want to borrow my pickup?
@@wadejones4791 Lol, no, I just believe that it's time for like~minded people to get out of the 501c3 churches and get together to study to show themselves approved so iron can sharpen iron!
Great video, what translations are you using in this video?
The Catholics have Mary, the Christians have Paul. The awaken Abarym have Yahusha/Yahshua. In the end, whose words and Commands will YOU follow?
Yahshua for me
Jesus Christ durr everyone obviously point to him biblically
Catholics are Christians.......
If you exclude the historical context and who Paul's letters were written to and what they were practicing, then you can be led to believe his writing goes against Yashua's teachings, which of course they don't.
Really? Because I have never thought him to be that way before I read his letters.
Yes they do.
@@thesword2380 I know it's a longshot but do you live in Washington state?
Paul's writings very much go against the teaches of God and Jesus.
@@zamiel3 How?
I recently uploaded a video titled: God Sheds Light on Paul being a False Apostle - No Coincidences in Scripture.
I'm sure that you (and viewers) will find information in it regarding Paul that most have never considered before. It's roughly 30 minutes long.
I also have another video uploaded 6 years ago titled: Proof That Paul Is A Apostle Of Satan.
It is an hour and 45 minutes long and includes mounds of evidence of Paul being false.
More and more of the elect are having their eyes opened regarding Paul. Praise God.
Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.
God Bless Brother!
It cannot be explained simpler than that!
Paul says he saw Jesus in the dessert but Jesus said if someone some and says here the messiah in the desert don’t believe him
Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.
Great point. Along with other obvious contradictions. It’s puzzling that when scripture says there are only 12 apostles, there are some saying 13 apostles.
This is about when Jesus is coming back. He explains that it is impossible for someone to say “I am the Messiah” or “Jesus came back, I saw Him” because when He comes back it will be like lightning.
Paul never claimed to be the Messiah. This verse is about false Messiah’s not about false prophet’s.
That's about Jesus' second coming. It is not about visions, like Paul and John had.
It's talking about if they are saying that the messiah has returned. Read the context! Paul didn't claim jesus had returned. Paul had a vision. There's a difference.
You must keep the Sabbath....
Luke 23:56 KJV
[56] And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments; and rested the sabbath day according to the commandment.
Is it eternal?
@@ethanreed2672 In Isaiah 66:22, our Heavenly Father makes a new Heaven and a new earth. In 66:23, from Sabbath to another, all flesh will worship Him.
It doesn't make sense to think that Sabbath was ever not supposed to be remembered.
The Sabbath Commandment is the only one that starts with remember because He knew that it was going to be the one that satan attacked.
The enemy only has to get us to break one because James 2:10, if you break one point of the law, you are guilty of breaking all!
@@godwinz9925 Yeah the Sabbath is irrelevant, I've done enough research.
@@ethanreed2672 What do you mean that the Sabbath is irrelevant?
@@godwinz9925 We aren't suppose to keep in in this day in age, I learned after my studies that keeping the Sabbath day isn't what saves us, it's what Jesus Christ did on the cross for you and I. I know this might sound like a simple baby like message but it's the truth, NOTHING ELSE saves you other than the shed blood of Jesus Christ now may I ask you, do you put your FULL TRUST in that?
As Peter thought of Paul as a beloved brother, Paul must have been a God's servant. However, it seems like he was inconsiderate in choosing terms and looked over a consequence caused by his vague terms in regard to "LAW" in his letters. He is probably so sad to see that so many pastors twist his messages and lead people to destruction. I think that in a way Paul is responsible for this.
Yes he is responsible
Like Paul said in Galatians about them if you fall from grace can you be restored will you be????
Thank you for this explanation. I appreciate your time. Take care and be blessed...
Sin is the transgression of the law. 1 John 3:4
Sin is indeed trangression of the law..thank God that we have Christ Jesus who paid the debt that we are unable to pay..in doing so he set aside the law of Moses so that we may follow the law completely..the law that is Christ.
We are no longer under the law of Moses therefore we are no longer to keep or to follow the the law of Moses..Christ said to follow him..lets all follow the law that is Christ.
@@adambrooks6860
_"We are no longer under the law of Moses therefore we are no longer to keep or to follow the the law of Moses."_
Then you admit that you and people like you are continually in sin.
@@Idazmi7 i am a sinner because i am not perfect..God is the only one perfect..if you do not have the full love of Christ then you are a sinner..none of us has the full love of Christ because we are not Christ..Christ forgives us of our sins.
We are under the law of Christ not the law of Moses.
It is written..
"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us." ( 1John 1:8) (NIV)
May God bless you.
@@adambrooks6860 but in Matthew christ himself says.
Matthew 5:48
[48]Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
@@adambrooks6860 also saying that you are a sinner is not an excuse to keep sinning.
Romans 6:1-2
[1]What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
[2]God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
Thanks for this teaching Lex! Shalom from Belgium
Another good teaching. And of course scripturally sound.
We are no longer under the law of Moses but the law of Christ.
@@adambrooks6860The law of Moses? What's that?
Ohhh, you mean the law of the one true God who chose Moses to be His messenger. The God whom Yahshua said, "I and My Father are one."
This Yahshua is the one who obeyed EVERYTHING His Father asked of Him unto death, {and thankfully resurrection!}
How can anyone think that the One described above is happy that we're accusing Him of changing His Father's laws!!
{P. S. I have to give credit where credit is due. That was written by inspiration because like everyone, I have my own struggles.}
@@godwinz9925 It's true..we are under a new covenant with God and we are saved by grace through faith not by works of the law..the law cannot save us but faith in Christ can..you say you have struggles and I too have struggles..it is ok to have them but we must stop from doing these things before we can get right with him..please believe me when I say that it is ok to sin now and again..it is ok that we do this so that we can show our human side to God..we are flawed so it is ok to do these things as long as we keep trying and pray to God for his forgiveness.. We are no longer under the law of Moses though so don't worry about keeping the 613 laws of the old testament..that is too much of a burden to bare..instead worry about the commandments that we are to keep..the ones that are laid out in our new covenant with God in the new testament..Jesus said that we are to place our burdens upon him and that we need to do this all the time in order to stay with him..i hear God's voice and he tells me that when we sin we are to place our burden upon him..it is something that I still struggle with doing myself..i have my own struggles as you do too and that is ok..if you would like to talk about these struggles then we can do so..it is good to confess our sins to eachother..if not we can still talk this out..have a nice day.
@@adambrooks6860 We agree, we are not saved by the law. {Btw, the law is not works.} Obeying the law is an expression of our faith.
"If you love Me, keep My Commandments."
Hey, I have a very important question that I would like to get as many people as possible’s reaction on.. especially the owner of this channel since you spent a lot of time with the Bible. What do you guys think about the preaching of Dr. Myles Munroe ? He preached a lot about how God did not mean to create a religion and about that the main purpose is the kingdom on earth , however there are doubters of his preaching. What do you guys think ? PLEASE let me know your opinion ...
false teacher
Lex, please help me out, though. I need it. QUESTIONS: Does Rev. 2:2 show that Paul's gospel was at odds with THE EMMANUEL? Didn't he teach that it was alright to eat food sacrificed to idols, if you did not offend your brother in doing so WHEN EMMANUEL REBUKED IT AT ALL?
How do you know that the stories in Acts are true? Luke was a disciple of Paul and only Luke (apart from Paul himself) claimed that Paul was an apostle of Yeshua. Since 2 Peter was believed to be written after 100 AD by most Biblical scholars, the Peter's epistle can not be used to prove the correctness of Paul's writings. Even if it were written by Peter, the letter does not approve Paul to be an apostle while Peter claims himself to be an apostle of Yeshua. It is very unfair for Peter to call himself as an apostle of Yeshua but Paul as a beloved brother if Peter would have approved Paul to be an apostle also. We also know that there are at least two independent witnesses besides Paul and his disciples to prove Paul's apostleship. But we have none!
Paul heard a voice. He didn't seen jesus
The word Apostle means = “Official Representative.”
Case 1: Believe in the Authenticity of the 66 Bible Canon
- Paul is called an Apostle.
Case 2: Don’t
- Paul claimed to be an Official Rep of the Lord Jesus Christ
- None of his contemporary Official Reps of Jesus claimed him to be a False Teacher.
-They didn’t oppose his claim which he made public to so many.
-Paul lived, loved and died according to the Gospel teachings of Jesus Christ.
-Paul’s faith has influenced every generation since he walked on Planet Earth.
@@damhar In the desert like Jesus said to be wary of
Another good teaching! Which translation of the scriptures do you use in your teachings so that I can better follow along?
I usually use the NKJV
UNLEARN the lies 👍🏼
Timely video, I am doing a study that's related to this, thanks a bunch.
Like your channel! Can u do a video on which name is correct, Yashua, Yahshua, or Yahushua?
None of the above
Matthew 16:6 Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and *beware of the leaven of the Pharisees* and of the Sadducees.
Acts 23:6 But *when Paul perceived* that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, *he cried out in the council,* Men and brethren, *I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee:* of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question.
thank you brother🙏❤
Good day Lex, am Daniel from Nigeria, I would like to know if the book of Enoch was removed from the Bible, and if its real, be glad to hear from you
No, it was not removed from the Bible. It was added by certain groups such as the Ethiopian church, but it was not originally part of the Scriptures. It was written by at least 9 different authors, none of them being Enoch himself. And it was written about 200 years BC. I do not believe it is legit or accurate or Scripture.
YAHUAH HAS BLESS YOU LEX THANK YOU I SHARE THIS VIDEO
false, he isnt blessed for propagating the lies
1Co_15:10 But by the grace of God I am what I am
that my friend, is blasphemy
and this is worse
Gal_4:14 And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.
People says Paul was wrong in his teachings because he teaches what they don’t want to believe! To get rid of Paul, you need to get rid of the Old Testament and the most part of the New! We can’t pick and choose what we want to believe or do. This world is becoming more evil everyday, the Holy Spirit is gradually being withdrawn from this world. If each person could take a part out of the Bible, we wouldn’t have a Bible anymore, everyone would be doing what their minds tell them to do. This video is true, thank you🥀🙏
To get rid of Jesus you have to get rid of the old testament.
I know where your heart is but if we remove Paul, we still have the Bible.
Jon Jon how would we, Paul taught doctrines in the old as well as the New Testament, if you take what he wrote away, what do we have left?
@@bobbi2235 what did Paul teach in the old testament? Paul is merely a man who taught from the "old testament". He didn't write it.
His writings were never considered scripture then.
All you need is the gospels and the old testament.
We follow Jesus not Paul.
@@jonathanmiller1040 Jesus is the God of the Old Testament everything was created by him. John 1:3 (KJV) All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made.
@@wazzzappening4848 yea? Not sure how your taking my post but read my first post.
The gospel is important as it shows us how to livr according to the way Jesus spoke the law.
Do not parrot whatever your priest told you, do your own research, and you will find the True path!
@Moshe • Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.
What is the Gospel?
@@kulassiwsiwit4917 the Gospel of the Kingdom is that this life is a test of righteousness for the citizenship of the Kingdom of ageless life that is fast approaching. In order to be righteous we follow the words of Jesus, and none else. His words are truth, wisdom, justice, logic, and mercy.
@@ziz.ranchero So how do I get saved?
@@kulassiwsiwit4917 repent from transgressions of Torah, follow jesus instructions, and be baptized.
"When U hear Truth, U will hear my voice." A man or his words will never have precedence over Firstly my FATHER or my LORD Jesus CHRIST. I do have suspicions because we have seen many indications of contamination. Not judging the man only his fruits, we are told "If you want to be anything in Heaven then we will choose to be the least on earth." Paul is quoted calling himself the super Apostle., odd. When you enter a house that eats of the unclean eat what they eat and quoted Our LORD saying "It's not what you put in your mouth that makes you unclean, its what comes out of it." Our LORD Jesus CHRIST reiterated many times that "I did not come to do away with one iota of the Law only to build on it." Love n Blessings Family!!!
Hey, i'm enjoying your methodical analysis of these topics in the scriptures. I would love for you to do a video on polygamy and if it is God's intent for man and if it was sanctioned by God. Thank you!
Exceptional Lex straight from the Bible. The mind of God is to remove self opinion and determination. Well done.
Except that I don't think that the narcissist plagiarist Albert Einstein was really such a good example to be used there. Furthermore a good video, though.
Read the Bible and you won’t need Lex to read it for you. Thanks brothers and God bless you all ☺️
Yes. Read the bible yourself. And think for yourself. And ask questions. And discuss with your friends.
@@anonymaus8191 true. That way atleast we won't be deceived by anyone.
I find it interesting that we don’t have any books about the ministry of the disciples after the ascension
Great teaching, brother 😊
Execelent video! Paul taught about the wrong use of the law, and not against the law itself. Law itself cannot save, because we need Christ in us to be saved. Christ enables us to keep the law which comes naturally once we understand spiritual matters and no longer hold on to the old lusts of the flesh.
lex is too embarrassed to admit he is wrong
1Co_15:10 But by the grace of God I am what I am
that my friend, is blasphemy
and this is worse
Gal_4:14 And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.
@@michaelstevens1870 By the grace of God, I am what I am. Paul was a converted man. God made Paul what he is. No blasphemy there.
Those people didn’t despise Paul because of his physical handicap but accepted Paul as an Angel and even as Christ. That doesn’t mean they thought he was an Angel or Christ, it simply means they accepted his teachings as coming from Christ.
@@KingArtexerxes
He is just an NPC, ignore him.
Ashayah said this is the love of Yah. Keep the commandments.
Good job Lex. Blessings.
I would be interested to know why Paul went against the teaching of Gamaliel in persecuting Christians.
I'm not sure whether anyone else heard Lex's reference to Saul first persecuting and violently oppressing the believers and then turning around and adopting the "truth", but, is it just me, or does that sound EXACTLY what Constantine and the Roman Catholic church did? They adopted the "truth" and then added their pagan rituals/holidays to it, as Paul says "what is an idol" and that whole pro-eating meat sacrificed to idols spiel. Good grief!! He is probably where Constantine and the Catholics got that little trick. To well did Jacob prophecy of Benjamin in the latter days.
Benjamin is a ravenous wolf;
In the morning he shall devour the prey (like Stephen),
And at night he shall divide the spoil (as in 30,000 denoninations).
[Deep sigh...]
May you all have the discernment to see.
beautiful you are woke.
He saw a light in the sky when he was walking alone at night. And took it upon himself to turn traditional Judaism upside down and create a whole new religion. Christianity.
@@anonymaus8191 do you also find it ironic that Paul himself says:
2Co 11:14 - "And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light."
Why did Jesus say he would not return in private? Why did he warn about a false chist in the wilderness or in a room? Why was Paul blinded by its appearance ? (Satan is the light angel)
Why did "jesus" say to Paul two times not to inquire the only twelve apostles about this encounter? Why didn't he heal Paul from the angel of Satan? Why did Paul say multiple times that his words are his own inspiration? Why did Paul say that "we" don't have to obey the sabath ?
Why was his writings only integrated in to the Canon after the pagans infiltrated the church with there costumes and traditions?
If you care about my salvation please explain me these points only using the Bible. Thank you 🙏
Polycarp, direct disciple of Apostle
John quoted Paul on multiple occasions in his epistle and treated his writings as scripture,
This was around 100AD yes before “the pagans inflated the church”, as you said above.
@AndrewFisherOfMen Simon Magus . You know this name? Also called the enemy of Peter...
@@kurt___9984 he had a confrontation with Peter in acts, what about it? He was a sorcerer
Lex i have a question - But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. -Matthew 6:6
Is it really true that when you pray you pray alone inside your room in secret and no one must see? clarify me with this your videos are awesome i am enlighten much from all of it. I really just want to know what it really says about praying.
Jen Nice _Jesus taught in parables (and even riddles)._ To pray in your closet in secret; _I believe_ is to pray inside your mind and thoughts (where no one else can see.) Even to pray with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength.
_Also note what these scriptures teach us of prayer:_
Proverbs 15:29 The LORD is far from the wicked: but *he heareth the prayer of the righteous.*
Psalms 66:18 *If I regard iniquity in my heart, the Lord will not hear me:*
Proverbs 28:9 *He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be abomination.*
_( A person must repent of sin to get their prayers heard. )_
Include the whole context of the passage.
“And when you pray, you shall not pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, THAT THEY MAY BE SEEN BY MEN. Assuredly I saw to you, they have their reward”
The same goes for fasting, do not disfigure your face as to be seen as fasting by men. Also, the act of charity, giving without being known to have given.
This is the theme in the ministry of Yeshua.
Today we call this virtue signaling, showing yourself to be virtuous in the sight of men.
The father wants a relationship directly with you and wants you do good things while not seeking the approval of men. It’s the Father approval that you are after.
Remember, the old covenant is one of the letter and are based on actions.
The new covenant is one of the spirit and is based on the heart of the believer.
Men cannot see the content of our hearts, only the Father can do that.
I'm so confused! So why does God give us commandments (other then the TEN) wich say "and you will do this FOREVER as a LASTING COVENANT throughout your generations" i don't get it? I thought God is " the same yesterday today an foever for i do not change" im reading or trying to read from beginning to end. Cross-referencing Paul (sol). So did God change his mind? Did he lie. Im confused. Please help me understand. I have the (1st 5) saying this and this. But the new "12" saying that and not this?
Paul is a false apostle and he is an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.
Paul says that Abraham was justified by faith, and James says the opposite.
Paul says grace and faith only, James says works are equally important.
Paul says that he is a Pharisee, standing before Herod.
Pauls conversions stories don't mesh. (Acts 9, 22, 26.)
I can comfortably state that saul is highly suspect.
Cascadian Applications According to the Apostle Peter, your UNTAUGHT and twist to your own your destruction!
@@347faf7 Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.
Yes, in order to understand the epistles of Paul you must have a stable understanding of the Law and Prophets
Nah, I used to believe that but the more I learn TaNaKh the more I see Paul utterly as a Heretic against Yah.
Compare Romans 10:8, deut 30;14 as an example. If Paul wasn't against Torah, wouldn't he avoid taking the passage out of context and switching the conclusion from *doing* Torah to professing faith in HIS gospel? (The word of faith)
Yah warns of not taking anything from His word.
Paul repeatedly does this. He takes four words and builds an ungodly pretext.
@THINK FOR SELF good point
@@ziz.ranchero not according to Peter
@@Endtimer2020 have you even read it? Peter and James epistles were direct refutation of Paul's false gospel of grace.
The greek word dysoetas is translated as "hard to understand ". Most erroneously use this as affirmative when it is actually pejorative. And calling a fellow jew a wise brother does not equate to the title and honor of apostle. How many quotes of Messiah is in Paul's epistles? Answer= ZERO.
the law and the prophets speak both against paul and the rabbinical jews
This video was excellent. Thank you!
What I needed brother. He is very hard to understand but yet I was half way to getting that understanding.
Lex thank you so much for your teachings. You are true blessing.
Very True. He gave his life for the gospel and Christ is REAL. He really IS! Thanks for the teaching
How do you know that? Because your mommy told you that?
There is ZERO evidence that Paul even was aware of the gospels.
Or the writers made the paul character gave himself
Great content and Sorry but the cut off on the microphone is a bit distracting.
There is one verse where it seems Pauls says eating food sacrificed to idols is ok and Jesus says its forbidden in Revelation
It just goes to show that The Love of God is good for all, even Paul it's called repentance people!! Stop calling him a false apostle he had a change of Heart and a shot at eternal life!! Read the scriptures!!
Most Christians absolutely love to sin and don't show they have the Holy Spirit.
I disagree.scripture does not say you are sanctified by a believing spouse.but Paul does
@@jeffouellette9946 that is sadly true. We need to repent.
@@andreawimer4334 Peter quoted in his letter that some of Paul his writings are indeed hard to understand. And some are using this to twist the scriptures...
he is was an unrepentant lying pharisee
Are you on a weight loss program? You have changed look facially and physically since the first time I watched you.
Thanks for the efforts to teach the truth.
No, I am not on any program or diet.
So does it mean should gentiles obey the law of Moses? Since christ said he didn't abolish the law but to fulfill it and Paul isn't teaching anything against Torah so should gentiles need to follow the commandments?
I recently realized the etymology of the word appalled. This is how some people feel while reading Paul.
Why didn’t Paul have a second and third witness of his encounter with Yeshua?
And, wasn’t he the first one to preach celibacy? Blessings.
He did.
The Trinity.
Open Air Preaching Sherrick Duncan In what sense the trinity? Shouldn’t all essential important events have at least two human witnesses? I am very interested in learning, so please explain. Thanks
The men who were with Saul/Paul heard the voice of the Lord, but didn't see anyone. (Acts 9:7), so in one sense, he did have witnesses to his conversion
Jen Ward Yes, in a sense, but not the way two or more witnesses are seen throughout the bible.
And regarding celibacy, why did he promote that ? There’s nowhere in the bible another mention of it, on the contrary, the first commandment in Genesis is to be fruitful and multiply.
Not only did Paul/Saul not have two or three credible witnesses of that event, but if you carefully compare his three accounts, his story changes significantly over the years. And I'm not just referring to whether the two Roman deputies with him saw or did not see or heard or could not hear. More than that is Paul/Saul said that he was told to be taken to Ananias for healing & for his instructions. Initially, he claims to be humbled, lost, & submissive in the event. Yet, over the years, the story morphs like a mythical fish story & by the end, Paul is magnified into the hero of the event, being directly told all things by Yeshua personally witb Ananias eventually being completely removed from the whole account. It's almost as if Paul healed himself. If Paul were on trial, his testimony would have been suspect at best. Any detective carefully questions when a witness' account varies to the degree which Paul's clearly varied.
For comparison, we can read Peter's two accounts of the sheet coming down out of heaven with clean & unclean animals upon it. Both of Peter's accounts are identical. Even though there were no human witnesses on the roof with Peter, I am confident in his account of the vision. It makes a statement which makes sense, causes a permanent change of heart on Peter's part, & has an ongoing selfless purpose in promoting the will of YHVH.
Paul's Damascus accounts don't make logical sense when combined, don't reflect a permanent change of heart on Paul's part, & seem to have selfish motivation of justifying Paul's claim to fame.
Paul claimed to believe, but he also still claimed his discipleship under Gamiel. He still claimed to be a Pharisee. He still claimed his Roman citizenship. The disciples who were appointed apostles gave up their earthly titles & professions; whereas, Paul did not. All things to all men, in order words, a chameleon.
John had been told not to try to stop a man from healing in the name of Yeshua because he was not part of their group. For such a man will not be quick to say bad things in the next moment. He will get his reward.
I believe that when Paul came along claiming to heal in Yeshua's name & be an apostle, the apostles did not forbid him as the Messiah had instructed them not to forbid or resist such people. He was like a tare sown by the evil one among the wheat.
Paul had been a persecutor of believers. He had actually been on the way to Damascus to serve arrest warrants he had gotten for believers. Then suddenly, he was converted & thus Paul had suddenly became less dangerous. Yeshua said to let such grow among the wheat until maturity or risk damaging the wheat while trying to extricate them from the wheat field of YHVH.
Peter in his letter did not confirm nor deny whether Paul was an apostle, but he did make sure to refer to him, rather conspicuously, as a brother. And he referred to Paul's wisdom. Wisdom is never the same thing as hands on experience with man Yeshua, the Christ. And the warning to believers to be careful if reading Paul's difficult to understand writings without a firm foundation in the Law, Prophets, & the gospel is very revealing. Peter was clear that Truth about the Father & the Son should be basis for belief & Paul's writings should be considered addendums. Peter was warning people that the writings were unclear to the unlearned & were ripe for corruption by devious leaders actually directing naïve & gullible seekers into destruction. In other words, Paul may not have even meant for his words to be misrepresented, but Peter had prophesied they would be, with evil effects. None of that sounds like a reference for basing one's faith off of Pauline doctrine, now does it?
Yet, people lap up Paul almost as a replacement for Yeshua.
Additionally, Peter & the rest of the apostles had already clearly defined the qualifications for being an apostle at the council in Jerusalem. Only 14 people on earth had ever met those qualifications. No matter what personalized & custom teaching that Yeshua might give Paul, he could not serve as a verifiable witness to the entire Ministry, death, burial, resurrection, & ascension of the Lamb. And thirteen of the qualifying men had already been appointed by either Yeshua himself or the council of the apostles. Paul doesn't qualify, period.
Nowhere in scripture does Paul state that there was a formal, public appointment of him to the apostleship either. Unnamed, never brought before the apostles Roman military men don't count. Paul appointed himself to a position he clearly wasn't even qualified for. Then Paul must have also later appointed his personal cronies to Paul's definition of apostleship as well. Tsk, tsk.
Many times I wonder if the super apostles that Paul are so irate about aren't possibly real duly appointed apostles. Paul never says the men aren't apostles. It's more of a I was here first, if you're friends with them & believe what they have to say, you are being disloyal, allehiance is owed to Paul, & he's not going anywhere until he wins. Well, guilt tripping people, lording over them, & whining aren't fruits of he spirit. Even if the super apostles are lying, Yeshua instructed that when you go into a house ministering, you bless the house. If the householders later reject the message, you are supposed to remove your blessing from the house, shake or brush the dust from your feet, & go on your way. Paul did not do this. He told people he was a thief (of monies from other places) & he wasn't going anywhere. He was in his realm & he essentially owned them. That sounds more like the traits of the devil than a messenger of YHVH. It is E disturbing when Paul claims to be their father who is prepping the bride. Yeshua had said call no man father. YHVH had been clear that the Son of the free woman was approved. The Son of the bondwoman was not. Neither the Father nor the Son want a bride who has been coerced. That is why there is freewill.
Line upon line, precept upon precept upon precept, there a little, there a little & soon enough the modern Pauline theology falls to dust.
Paul claimed that Satan's workers could masquerade as righteousness just as Satan likewise appears to be an angel of light. it very well could be Paul was knowingly, or unknowingly speaking about himxelf.
The whole bible works together as an almost living organism, Law, Prophets, Writings, Gospels, & Revelation. And if you take the sin offering as having been completed with the Instruction (Law) still serving as a guide, even the Acts & the Epistles fit, even Paul's writings, believe it or not, it all still fits. Paul circumcised after the council, Paul paid for animal sacrifices times 5 long after the ascension for Nazarite vows. It's only when Pauline doctrine comes into play that it breaks apart.
Paul is suspect.
Actually...lol.. Paul is the ONLY person that refers himself as an apostle..not the "bible" or any of the REAL apostles....
You had to have qualifications to be one...you had to be there the full time the messiah did his teachings and miracles be there from start to finish...to watch him be crucified and so on...last I knew he came in the picture AFTER that was done... The whole purpose of being an apostle is being a witness to that time and go and tell the whole world what happened... Paul does NOT qualify....
So Ananias is a liar? Peter too?
Very very true!!
Excellent! Thank you and Shabbot Shalom.
1Co_15:10 But by the grace of God I am what I am
that my friend, is blasphemy
and this is worse
Gal_4:14 And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.
@@michaelstevens1870 i will examine both those scriptures. I can understand concern with the i am what i am, but will prayerfully look at this.
@@michaelstevens1870 i dont know if you have looked at the Greek text, but its worth checking out. I just got done comparing Jesus I AM statements to the 1 cor 15:10. I can't say i came to the same conclusion you did, but i appreciate your input. Much agape and shalom.
Thank you!
Using Acts to defend Paul... you clearly have no clue what the other side of the argument is. Is this a joke? Paul was personally chosen by Yeshua but Yeshua NEVER mentioned him while he was alive, or met him? Are you speaking for Yeshua now? If anything he stated clear warnings that could be construed to refer to Paul. Look, I'm still up in the air on this but this video is not helping your case at all.
Agree, I'm up in the air too, I could really use a response video to the 2 that ChristianTruthers put out because they are VERY convincing and I can't just dismiss them like I thought I'd be able to, the only reason I'm STILL undecided is that Paul's epistles made it into our bibles, that's seriously the ONLY reason at this point so I REALLY need to hear someone speak on the specific things brought up and if I don't sometime soon I'm going to have to conclude that there ARE no answers to these issues, which is what I'm legitimately afraid of. 😒
@@marydetray6776 I've been observing the situation regarding Justin from Christian Truthers. The reaction alone from a lot of people in the Torah observing community has truly rubbed me the wrong way. I'm still seeking the matter out with an open mind but it boggles my mind how fast someone can go from "respected and trusted man that walks in the spirit" to "deceiver spreading false doctrine". Some people truly do not know how to have a civilised discussion online haha.
@@marydetray6776 _It should be noted that Jesus of course would have known about Paul even before Paul came._
_And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_
John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.*
John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.*
_The person of Jesus' prophecy in John__14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._
_Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which is during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_
_But why didn't Jesus tell the his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._*
Please note the following:
_Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._
_Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_
@@marydetray6776 _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_
_What Paul teaches in Galatians:_
Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;*
Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
_(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_
Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.*
_(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_
_According to Paul; Peter was [given by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_
_Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._
_And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._
_I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._
_This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._
*_If anyone disagrees perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._*
@@marydetray6776 _Moreover:_
_Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_
Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;*
Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
_(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_
Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office:
_(In Romans __11:13__ Paul makes a clear claim to be “the apostle of the Gentiles”.)_
_(However before Paul came, and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples; Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_
Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.
Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted.
Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen.
_(In Matthew __28:16__ is concerning the now remaining 11 disciples.)_
_(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” All nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_
_More in Mark:_
Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.
Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.*
Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
_(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_
_And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen.
_The teaching that Peter was to preach to a different group of people is directly against, and is contrariwise to what Jesus told his disciple while he was with them and talking much with them. The contrariwise teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul during the exact time that Jesus is not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._
_Paul was and is a wolf in sheep's clothing._
I really appreciate you trying to put out something helpful at this time but this video is utterly inadequate in defending Paul's apostleship and answers nothing of what has been brought up regarding him by the channel ChristianTruthers. I'm REALLY hoping someone does a response soon because I'm beginning to think there just ARENT any answers to the issues raised and if that's the case I don't KNOW what to other than reject Paul. I've READ all of the new Testament, and the old for that matter, many of the arguments that have been put forth against Paul's apostleship are FROM the scriptures themselves and they aren't JUST "Paul taught against the law" they are MUCH more than that. I am still trying to work through it but am having a very difficult time holding onto Paul's writings at this point, PLEASE can you watch the 2 videos that ChristianTruthers did on Paul and do a video either refuting the points brought up in them or telling us why they are wrong or misguided because I'm having REAL difficulty dismissing them. Thank you so much, I'm sure if you choose to do a response video it will be a blessing to us all. Peace and love ❤
This video was published in january of 2019. It is NOT a response to Justin Best's video.
_Paul was and is a wolf in sheep's clothing._
_It should be noted that Jesus of course would have known about Paul even before Paul came._
_And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_
John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.*
John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.*
_The person of Jesus' prophecy in John__14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._
_Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_
_But why didn't Jesus tell the his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._*
Please note the following:
_Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._
_Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_
_Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_
_What Paul teaches in Galatians:_
Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;*
Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
_(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_
Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.*
_(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_
_According to Paul; Peter was [given by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_
_Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._
_And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._
_I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._
_This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._
*_If anyone disagree perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._*
_Moreover:_
_Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_
Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;*
Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
_(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_
_And while Jesus was not talking much with them (John __14:28__-30) Paul makes this claim about himself in Romans __11:13_
Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office:
_(However, before Paul came and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples, Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_
Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.
Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted.
Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen.
_(In Matthew __28:16__ is concerning the now remaining 11 disciples.)_
_(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” All nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_
Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.
Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.*
Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
_(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_
_And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen.
_The teaching that they were to preach to two different groups of people is directly against and in contrast to what Jesus told his disciple while he was with them and talking much with them. The contrariwise teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul exactly during the time that Jesus is not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._
Hey I found a video that could help you out
This is a very good video. I love reading Paul as he draws exacting lines and really drives home the fullness of many matters. I also love reading John who speaks in abstract spiritual terms, yet we see John says "sin is transgression of the Law".
What we see is that Torah was so standard that it wasn't argued for as though it were in question. Many people who desire lawlessness read The New Testament as if it would spell out a detailed argument proving Torah is the word of Theos, but we know Torah is the word of Theos and so did they. Rather The New Testament focuses on the fulfilments which were not yet understood, and in this focus it often speaks of what The Law does not accomplish and insists on Christ and The Holy Spirit Of All Truth to accomplish Salvation and Holiness.
Much love everyone ♥️.
1Co_15:10 But by the grace of God I am what I am
that my friend, is blasphemy
and this is worse
Gal_4:14 And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.
@@michaelstevens1870
Huh?
Sir plse explain Matthew 5:17-18.
Christians need to keep the Law. That is the moral duty of all Christians. I also recommend my video "Apostle Paul is a false apostle" which exposes Paul.
Poor video. It didn't take up any of the bible verses used by those who claim Paul was a false apostle.
I thank God, through our Lord Jesus christ, for the apostle Paul,
Des Walker: Yes, me too!
Yes, amen!
Why do you call Paul an apostle when Jesus Christ calls him a "liar" in Revelation 2:2.
Thanks much for your teaching 😊😇👍🏼
I am so glad you touched on this. I can’t tell you how many people I’ve heard a version of how Paul is not a legitimate source of truth and it’s mostly from my Jewish friends. One of them said it is believed that Paul was struck by lightning on the way to Damascus and nothing more.
Too bad they're not as well versed as Rabbi Tovia Singer.
Who points out that Paul has two different stories about his conversion.
Or there is no historical record that backs that anyone was ever commissioned to prosecute the followers of Yeshua in fact the Greatest Rabbi of their time, Gamaliel, especially forbade it as it is recorded in the N.T.
If Paul actually studied at the foot of this great Rabbi... he was a very very bad student to go directly opposed to Gamaliel's instructions!
Or that the Pharisees of Jerusalem had no authority in the territory of Damascus which was under the authority of the Sadducees.
@@TheAvegator I thought we are to call no man Rabbi? Hmmm...
@@RubySlippers1100
Everything should be read in the context of the chapter. Yeshua was referring to the misuse of the title by the Pharisees;creating added ordinances/laws/rules not to be found in the written scriptures of the prophets.
Our True Teacher is Yehowah! His Torah is the teacher's writings.
@@RubySlippers1100 👍
I’m still not convince I still think Paul was a wolf in sheep’s clothing...
@Lauren Maxwell 2 Cor 1:1 Paul bears witness (to himself)
The Bible says that Paul was an apostle because Paul claimed this title for himself. The term apostle is reserved for the followers of Christ. Paul never met Jesus in person himself. Paul admits in Galatians 1:11-16 that what he preached he made up by himself. He was not taught this doctrine by any man but he was inspired by God to write it. God the Almighty only speaks to His prophets, Paul was no Prophet which is why he was rebuked by the disciples and encouraged to shave his head as a penance when they found out that he was preaching a new covenant. Paul believe believed his truth but he was never inspired by Jesus or God. I wonder whether it wasn't S who spoke to him on the road to Damascus
Dear Lex,
Do you know 119ministries?
They teach most, if not all, what you teach.
I think that it would be great if you could talk with them.
Shalom
I have spoken with Jon and Steve (but Steve is no longer with 119)
@@unlearnthelies , is there much difference between their teaching and yours?
And if so, what is the biggest difference?
Shalom
. In David Guzik's commentary, he writes of 1 Cor_9:19-23: Paul’s flexibility in ministry.
a. I am free from all men . . . that I might win the more: Paul was free to do what he wanted, but bringing people to Jesus was more important to him than using the freedom selfishly.
b. To the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win the Jews: To outside observers, it might have looked like Paul’s life was inconsistent. But he consistently pursued one goal: to win people to Jesus.
i. In Act_21:23-26, Paul participated in Jewish purification ceremonies, which he knew were not necessary for his own life, but he hoped would help build a bridge of ministry to the Jews. As well, in Act_16:3, Paul had Timothy circumcised - again, not because it was necessary, but because it could be helpful in getting ministry done among the Jews.
ii. “To the Gentiles he behaved himself as if he himself had been a Gentile, that is, forbearing the observances of the Levitical law, to which the Gentiles had never any obligation at all.” (Poole)
iii. “Paul sought to win people to Jesus Christ by being sensitive to their needs and identifying with them. We should try to reach people where they are today and expect to see changes later.” (Smith)
The book of James is aimed towards saul
And Jude and revelation 2:2
James and Jude fully agree with Paul.
@Nicholas
Jesus WARNED about Paul and his likes:
Matthew 5:17
Think NOT that I (Jesus) am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:18-19 “For verily I say unto you, TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS, one jot or one tittle shall in NO wise pass from the law, till ALL be fulfilled. WHOSOEVER therefore shall break one of these LEAST commandments, and SHALL TEACH men so, he shall be called the LEAST in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
[[See! ....WHOSOEVER therefore shall break one of these LEAST commandments, and SHALL TEACH men so, he shall be called the LEAST .....]]
Does that ring a bell? Paul is the answer.
********
Obviously, heaven and earth have not yet passed. The fact that you are reading this bears witness to this very simple fact. So Jesus is telling us that so long as creation exists, the laws and the commandments will be required from his followers. Anyone who will dare to say otherwise, until the end of time, will be called “the least in the kingdom of heaven.” Jesus the messiah and messenger had FOREWARNED about mankind’s attempt to distort and annul the commandments (the commandments Moses brought), which he had taught his followers to keep and himself had kept faithfully (along with whatever stipulations that God had prescribed Jesus Christ as per his time and place) throughout his mission on earth, and was warning his followers in no uncertain terms to be wary of all those who would attempt to do so.
Even towards the end of his ministry, Jesus Christ even instructs his disciples and the people to do what the Jew teachers say.
Matthew 23:2-3
2 “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat;
3 so PRACTICE and OBSERVE WHATEVER they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach, but do not practice.
***************
And what do the Jews teachers, the scribes and the Pharisees tell you?
To KEEP the laws and the commandments.
Jesus tells us that “If a man love me, he WILL KEEP MY WORDS: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.” John 14:23.
He taught to KEEP THE LAWS AND THE COMMANDMENTS TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS but Christians, who profess to be followers of the Christ, are doing the exact opposite of what Jesus the Christ himself said. Christians today are the followers of Paul. Christians are NOT the followers of Jesus Christ. Christians in fact AGAINST Jesus Christ as per fundamental doctrines. The believers in Crucifixion which is an abomination against Jesus Christ because he NEVER got Crucified or killed as the scriptures testify. The scriptures expose this falsehood.
********
Jesus WARNED in Matthew 7:15
Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in SHEEP'S clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.
@Nicholas
It's really an ammmmazing situation!
Those professing to love the Messiah, the Christian brethern, are ok with him humiliated and beaten and spat at and tortured, suffering the ignominy of the cross and death with all the nakedness with flies buzzing around. Oh what does this fake easy salvation card, such as sold by Paul, does to a persons thinking! My position as a muslim, a believer in the God of Abraham and Moses and Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them all), is that of a defender of the true honor and status of the beloved Messiah sent by God.
A crucified Messiah is a square circle anyway because if someone claiming to be the Messiah is crucified or killed then he is NOT the true Messiah. According to the many passages, God had foretold again and again in the Old Testament that the Messiah will be will be honored and be saved that God will not let him be humiliated and killed / crucified.
*************
No wonder they mocked the person on the cross because according to the evidence in the scriptures the true Messiah could never be put through such humiliation and death. True Messiah would be saved.
Mark 15:31-32
In the same way the chief priests and the teachers of the law mocked him among themselves. "He saved others," they said, "but he can't save himself!
Let this Messiah, this king of Israel, come down now from the cross, that we may see and believe." Those crucified with him also heaped insults on him.
******
Please pay specially attention to Psalm 91:11-12, 15)
Psalm 91
1 He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty.
2 I will say of the LORD, "He is my refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust."
3 Surely he will save you from the fowler's snare and from the deadly pestilence.
4 He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart.
5 You will not fear the terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by day,
6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness, nor the plague that destroys at midday.
7 A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you.
8 You will ONLY observe with your eyes and see the punishment of the wicked.
9 If you make the Most High your dwelling- even the LORD, who is my refuge-
10 then NO HARM will befall you, no disaster will come near your tent.
11 For he will command his angels concerning you to GUARD you in all your ways;
12 they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone. (If Jesus died on the cross and got buried, then his feet would've struck the ground and the stones on it from bringing him down, throwing him on the floor and burying him).
13 You will tread upon the lion and the cobra; you will trample the great lion and the serpent.
14 "Because he loves me," says the LORD, "I will RESCUE him; I will PROTECT him, for he acknowledges my name.
15 He will call upon me, and I will ANSWER him; I will be with him in trouble, I will deliver him and honor him.
16 With long life will I satisfy him and show him my salvation."
*********
32:9
There is no question that the emphasized parts above, especially in Psalm 91:11-12, 15 and the others, clearly and indisputably agree with the Noble Quran's Verses. Jesus was neither crucified nor resurrected, and he was protected and lifted by GOD Almighty. Also, the New Testament, again, confirms that Psalm 91 is referring to Jesus Christ.
GOD Almighty will HEAR his cries (Psalm 91:15) and will SAVE HIM (Psalm 91:3).
GOD Almighty will cover him with His PROTECTION (Psalm 91:4).
Christ will then not have any fear in him (Psalm 91:5).
Christ will then observe with his own eyes the punishment of the crucified ones (Psalm 91:8).
NO HARM (NO HARM means NO Harm. This includes crucifixion!) or disaster will even come near Christ (Psalm 91:10....this even contradicts him getting beaten up before crucifixion).
GOD Almighty will send down the Angels to protect him and lift him (Psalm 91:11-12, 14). Not even his foot will strike the ground from his enemies pushing, grappling and punishment.
Christ's call will be HEARD, and he will be DELIVERED AND HONORED (Psalm 91:15)
No way would these verses be valid if Christ got crucified.
We MUST remember that Jesus Christ prayed that Crucifixion be taken away from him. We must remember that the prayer of the righteous is POWERFUL and EFFECTIVE.
The Christian position makes Jesus a liar and an UNRIGHTEOUS person with an IMPOTENT and INEFFECTIVE prayer.
@Fiasal , Yeshua did warn against the-like which you speak of, and Paul himself warned against them also. Peter wrote highly of Paul calling Paul's writings Scripture and warning that they can be hard to understand. Paul said that those who claim he taught lawlessness were slandering him. Faisal, religion slanders Paul, learn about his teachings by reading them. I've read and fully understand Paul with ease and he is in full agreement with Yeshua and The Twelve. Religion lies about everything else, and they also lie about Paul.
A great presentation again brother Meyer.
Thank you, Sir ! May YHWH bless you and your family.
Peace to you all
Jesus truely is our Lord..that is why we are to follow him..we are no longer under the law of Moses.
Acts 5: 40-42:
And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.
And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name.
And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.
Amein Very Good points.
This also shows that "Paul" is and was not his name. His name is Sha'ool. "Paul" is a roman name and should not be printed in our Bibles. It is a clear mistranslation.
Deuteronomy 4, Proverb 30, Revelation of the Christ Jesus 22: 18, 19.
Matthew Ch. 5.
@@nuviarangel9201
_"then you shouldnt be using the name Christ either then. Symantical arguments separate the body of Messiah."_
False names separate the body of Messiah. I never use "Christ" myself.
@@nuviarangel9201
_"earthly language and arguments on symantics dont really apply in the Kingdom. Yeshua outside of the earthly vessel is spirit, where I highly doubt our lowly human languages compare to how we will communicate in the kingdom."_
And who created the Earth, and everything on it? The same being who also said "my people are called by my name". We must learn to use the proper names of things: even created things.
@@Idazmi7 did Adam name a lion "lion"? Or an apple "apple"
@@black-shiip1323
Did the messenger who came to Miriam say "call his name Jesus Christ?" I believe that we will learn the proper language in the Kingdom, and all the names with it. However, we are called by the _name_ of our Creator, even in this world, and knowing who we speak of is just as important as following Him. The Son of "God" is named Yehoshua: I won't use Christ as his name because it is not his name. "God's" name is written Yehovah, and it his his name that we are called by, even now.
God bless you brother !!!
AND WHOEVER TRIES TO SAY THAT I'M READING WHAT I READ IN A DIFFERENT CONTEXT, IS JUST ABSOLUTELY DELUSIONAL. LOOK IT SAY'S EXACTLY WHAT IT SAY'S AND I AM WILLING TO CHALLENGE ANY OF YOU ON THIS SUBJECT.. GO AHEAD AND ASK ME ANYTHING ABOUT THIS AND I'LL BACK IT ALL UP WITH SCRIPTURE.
Who was the newly appointed apostle after Judas was sent to exile and how can Paul be an apostle if he wasn't baptised by John the Baptist?
If Paul claims to be a "Apostle/messenger/sent" in Asia Minor after Acts 16:6 then Paul is a false apostle accordingly to Acts 16:6.
Apostle means "messenger, he that is sent"
G652 ἀπόστολος apostolos ap-os'-tol-os
From G649; a delegate; specifically an ambassador of the Gospel; officially a commissioner of Christ (“apostle”), (with miraculous powers): - apostle, messenger, he that is sent.
Acts 16:6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were *forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia,*
In both Acts 17 & Acts 18 … Paul does what Acts 16 forbidden him to do .
Per Acts 16:6 Paul claiming to be an apostle/messenger/he that is sent; would make Paul out as both a liar and a false apostle.
This is a beautiful explanation of Paul the apostle, thanks Lex...
Paul followed the Talmud.
Yes he never renounced his pharisee beliefs. He was racist and sexist.
Something else inspired Paul wrote is 1 Corinthians 7:19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.
Then why does Paul refer to the Torah as "dung"???
If they say Paul is a false Apostle,
then they think they are better than YHWH.
Rev 2:1, 2
After reading comments I am convinced some people can not see at all that Paul is absolutely False. Do your own research. He is a confusing narcissist that uses word salad to confuse and put himself in authority. I recommend LVE MINISTRY. ITS OVER 30 HOURS OF STUDY ON THIS SUBJECT
Very good and observant observations.
Was Paul (Gal. 2,7-8) or Peter (Acts 15,7) the Apostle to the gentiles?
Jesus gave instructs to his eleven Apostles to preach the gospel every creature. ("Every creature" would include "gentiles.")
Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.
Mark 16:15 *And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.*
Peter was
@Bible Study Channel II Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.
Paul constantly lowers himself and lifts up Jesus.