7 Times Paul Contradicted Jesus
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ค. 2023
- Was Paul a messenger sent from Christ or one of the false prophets Jesus warned against? In this video, I discuss some contradictions between the words of Jesus and the writings of Paul to see if they compliment or contradict one another.
Please keep in mind that all everything I say here is my subjective opinion, and is intended to deconstruct fundamentalist/evangelical/conservative Christian ideologies from an ex christian perspective
Why I left Christianity | • From Holy To Heretic |...
Why I make ex-christian deconstruction content | • Why I Make Ex-Christia...
Goodreads | / kristi-burke
Follow me on tiktok | www.tiktok.com/@kristi.burke?...
Follow me on Instagram | / jezebelvibes
Check out my merch | www.Jezebelvibes.com/shop
Need resources for religious trauma? Visit Recovering From Religion | www.recoveringfromreligion.org/
Outro Music | "Pixels" by Jeff Kaale
tags | Ex christian, deconstructing christianity, exvangelical, former fundie, leaving christianity, gospels, jesus, bible, god, christian, evangelism, apologist, atheist vs christian, agnostic, recovering from religion
Every time that I have been in a deep discussion with a Christian, I noted that when they liked what God said, they quote him. When they do not like what God said, they quote Jesus. When they do not like what Jesus said, they quote Paul. When I point this out, the discussion is often over.
it all just rolls downhill!
I never thought of it but that is the truth
Ha. NICE.
Or they say you are taking those verses they don't like out if context
Agreed!
Some important things to note:
I mistakenly attributed "faith without works is dead" to paul, but that was actually James! A kind follower in the comments pointed this out. So I wanted to correct that.
Also! many scholars believe 1&2 Timothy were not written by Paul, though *many* churches do believe Paul authored them. I side with the scholarly consensus that it was written by someone else- however many churches would agree that whoever wrote it was writing within the tradition of Paul's teachings. Either way, I'm attempting to work within the hypothetical notion that the gospels are accurate portrayals of the words of Jesus and that the letters attributed to Paul by the church were, in fact, written by Paul. I felt I made my approach clear in the beginning but perhaps I could have better clarified as many in the comments seem confused about my approach.
In my next video on Paul, I'll step outside of the hypothetical approach and examine him through a historical lens. And I'll be sure to better clarify when I'm approaching these topics within the hypothetical framework of church teachings.
the fact that you're willing to admit your wrong is very noble
There are 2 thing we can be certain about with the Epistle of James. 1, they were some of the very first writing of what would end up being Christianity. 2, The only writing that we can be almost certain were written in real time.
Paul and James agree that faith without works is no faith at all.
You just cannot be saved by your works since they are like filthy rags to God.
You no longer need to labour in vain, and feel undervalued, or overlooked.
Your faith in Christ will make you righteous.
His burden is light as He has gone before you and is victorious.
You can find rest for your soul in Jesus.
Has anyone noticed that the dead are rising?
I think it's hilarious that you are spiritually blind and can't see what's right in front of you. Do you understand what a corona actually is?
I tried to point out to a pastor how Paul was teaching opposite to Jesus and the response I got says it all…. This pastor didn’t address any of the points I made but got angry and said, quote, “How can you speak against him, he died for us”. I replied, “I’m speaking about Paul not Jesus”. He replied, “I know and you’re speaking against him”.
So that in itself says everything to me. Paul has taken the place of Jesus for this pastor and he’s not alone.
Please do more videos on Paul, the church needs to wake up. Thank you for your good works.
Think about this: If Jesus came to enact Jewish law and of the prophets as he told his 12 disciples why would Paul get rid of them?! You mean to tell me Jesus misspoke….or perhaps Paul never met Jesus and is a fraud.
I have no problem with disregarding Paul and remaining a Christian. I basically consider Paul a false prophet that primes us to identify other false prophets and bad pastors. There are some heresies that not even Paul would support that many pastors or denominations do. A key example are those that deny the bodily resurrection.
They do this with Mary too
1- Christ Physically Blinded Paul.. it wasn’t just a vision. Paul had physical Scales on his eyes blinding him.
2- Galatians 2:20 is talking about OUR SIN is completely forgiven through the crucitfition and only through JESUS did this happen… The Galatian Church had false teachers telling them Faith in Christ is not enough…
3- “Paul is teaching” “Paul is building Churches” .. Yes!
Mathew 23 8-10 he’s talking about the PHARISEES 😭 He’s telling them not to call the Jewish Leadership these names.
Jesus sent his Disciples City to City to teach and build his church.
4- Mathew 17:21-23 - Jesus is talking about Judgement day. When you stand infront of him and he will cast you away because Works WILL NOT ALONE get you into heaven.
5- ROMANS: 10:13 - Paul is saying you must believe in JESUS the Lord…
Yes you will be saved… But you can’t continue to love your sin or you will be cast into hell as you quoted in Mathew 17
You’re contradicting your own Theology without realizing it.
6- Romans 9 - Paul is taking about the Jews.. he is heartbroken they refuse to accept the messiah. He is saying “if yall keep messing around God he will let you live in your ways and his mercy will be gone”
This is throughout the entire Bible just like Jesus standing there with Abraham Genesis 19:24 .. Jesus called to the father in heaven to destroy the sinning city. Mercy was GONE
7- Mathew 5-7… Of course you’ll be shown mercy! Do you really think a ACTIVE SHOOTER killing people decides not to kill one person showing mercy then they are given Mercy by God? Cmon now
Everything she said is a Lie and made to confuse from what Paul and Jesus actually meant when they said it.
It’s very sad
@@3rdmardiv31 Interesting you say physical scales fell off his eyes. Did you know, when a snake sheds its skin of scales, it becomes very vulnerable throughout it for a few reasons, one of these is temporary blindness, until the scales on there eyes are off.
The irony is that Paul said the law was abolished and following it was bondage but then he added a bunch of laws. Exactly like the Pharisees.
Well stated.
The Law means law of Moses, not all laws. Also, the Pharisees did not make up laws.
He was, indeed, a pharasee.
@@Wisdom.Phoenix
No, that was the Sadducees.
Yup! My thoughts exactly.
What has always bothered me is that Jesus gave the keys to Peter - the Rock. And yet, we have very few of Peter's words in the modern Bible, but a ton of Paul's 'teachings' who didn't even know Jesus. IMHO, Christianity should be called Paulism because most Christians do not even follow Jesus' teachings. I would love a deep-dive into Paul!
I'm learning (mostly from Bart Ehrman) that the Christian religion that we have today is really based more on Paul than Jesus.
THIS!!! A thousand times, this👆! I had started to question the current understanding of the Bible due to other reasons, but when I started realizing that the Council of Nicea prioritized Paul's letters over including more about Jesus himself, I lost all hope that whatever might have been interpreted since could be truly divinely inspired. A God that "so loved the world" wouldn't want his message taught by a stranger who had visions over those who had direct experience with Jesus.
@@lisalivesay9084 And all the other books that they decided weren't important. Maccabees, The Gospel Of Thomas, Jubilees, etc.
@@johntiggleman4686Maccabee’s made it into the Catholic bible.
I think it may depend on the particular Christian sect with enough variation within each. The Christianity I adhere to sides more with Jesus in terms of inclusivity while I see Paul as a divider. After all, "Who's your neighbor?"
The Bible makes a lot more sense when you look at it as just a collection of religious writings, instead of trying to harmonize it as a collection of writings from the same perfect mind.
@@triplejazzmusicisall1883
It's pretty complicated. Throughout it's colorful history, the stories in, and order thereof, within the bible have subtly morphed and moved, in an organic fashion, with the winds of religious and political forces.
At the heart of it all though, the god thing is all BS.
Even if you could call the bible evidence, it’s poor. If the bible is egregiously faulty then the main character’s existence is likely fantasy. If the existence of Yahweh is a fiction then the god man Jesus cannot stand. Faith based on the contents of the bible is worthless for the following reasons…
There is real historical evidence of John the Baptist, but not of the greater Jesus. There is historical evidence of Apollonius of Tyana, who allegedly ascended to heaven, similar to Jesus, but there is no extra biblical evidence of Jesus during his lifetime. There is an historical record of Jesus Ben Pandera but, no Jesus the Galilean outside of the bible. Nothing. There’s Jesus ben Ananias, a rude peasant, who went around Jerusalem in 66CE prophesying its fall in 70CE; he’s recorded in documents outside the bible, but not the biblical Jesus. His alleged disciples never wrote anything they were uneducated peasants. Contemporaries never recorded his miracles nor his troublesome nature. The bible account says he was widely known and a divisive figure that the Romans never recorded. Neither did the Jews.
There were a number of people with the name Jesus, exhibiting Jesus behaviours, many have been recorded; but, not the Jesus of the bible. Was he a fiction? Indeed, you don’t require any actual person to have actually existed for a “reality” to grow from nothing. King Arthur and Robin Hood, along with William Tell, and others, come to mind. Was the biblical Jesus based on a composite of these other Jesus’s with reference to the Old Testament, plagiarised to elevate these people to one divine god.
There’s no evidence that all the first born were killed either in Egypt nor by Herod. I think the Egyptians would have recorded such a calamity and the calamities of the plagues, but nothing. Was it all made up?
The first line of the bible is clearly incorrect. The Earth was formed 9.8 billion years after the heavens. How did the creator get that wrong? And, the rest of the creation is wrong. It’s as if an ancient ignorant tribe wrote it all by themselves, no god to help.
There are no waters above the firmament, for a start. Heaven isn’t up there either, we’ve been there. The tribes of the Middle East wouldn’t have known oceans would be frozen but for the heat of the sun. Yet water filled the oceans and outer space, all with no sun. The light that made up the day was created before the sun. The ancients had no concept it was the sun that caused day and night. The moon isn’t a light. It’s fiction by an ignorant tribe with no access to a god creator.
Adam was made from dirt by magic and he, this god, forgot about Eve, an afterthought. so not an all knowing and wise god then?
Snakes and donkeys talk, nonsense fiction, right up there with Harry Potter, though JK Rowling was clearly a better writer with fewer continuity errors.
This god set up Eve by placing this magic apple within her reach. Then punished humanity thereafter. What a vicious god, if not a fictional one.
Nonsense fiction, by an ignorant ancient people writing about their mythology, their nation’s origins, steeped in the mists of the past, just the same as the Greek, Persian and Babylonian cultures write about their make believe gods who were equally fervently worshipped. Inanna, the dying and rising goddess was such an example. But many more dying and rising gods in the lexicon of ancient myths. Virgin births were pretty common too.
Adam and Eve’s children (as Eve was a clone of Adam) and grandchildren (as Cain, Able and Seth only had Eve to produce offspring or with their unknown sisters) could only have been produced by incest, then double incest, according to the biblical account. Clearly god didn’t know that the inbreeding of the biblical account would lead to genetic problems. None of it true, nothing a creator god would have penned. It was a fiction by a Jewish ancient people.
The Exodus apparently didn’t happen according to all evidence, acknowledged by the Jewish archaeologists who have tried to find it. The Egyptians never wrote of their army being swallowed by the sea. Mosses may never existed.
There is a massive amount of genocide in the bible by a god who failed to get the locals to behave. Genocide because the Israelites needed a land to make home. If a creator of the universe and humans could have just thought a new land, a new island, south of Cyprus, it would have appeared. Easy for a god, not so for an ancient tribe to pull off? Then, this god could have told these others how to behave and punished individuals, if that’s what was needed. But no, he went straight to mass murder. What?
And, the greatest god in the universe was defeated by iron chariots: Judges1:19. That is so ridiculous, such a puny god. Or, is it because the story was a creation of a tribe that had no concept of future technologies or tactics to defeat these new Iron Age chariots? I’m sure that a human Napoleon type tactician could have done better than the all wise, all powerful fictitious god of the universe.
Genesis 19 tells us of Lot being raped by this daughters. And yet this god is moral? He could have changed the course of their predicament, found him a younger wife or servant to sleep with, if a god. More incest.
The Jewish religion was at its heart, a blood sacrifice barbaric religion.
The books that were supposedly written by Mosses consist of a linguistic style that didn’t exist at the time of his “life”. It’s a fictitious narrative, written by the Jews to give their new nation an historical legitimacy, and unify them, in the midst of other powerful cultures in the Middle East. Didn’t help much though, they were constantly being invaded and subjugated by more powerful “gods” of other warring nations.
Even Yahweh acknowledged there were other gods. Remember the Ten Commandments tablets that were conveniently broken and then without fuss, lost. An all powerful creator of the universe who missed the opportunity to create the tablets out of an advanced technology, such as, I don’t know, Titanium? Is that because the Jews didn’t know about such a thing and so had no understanding of the future? The forging of such a technology would have cemented the truth of their god. Broken disappeared stone tablets: clearly, no god involved. Convenient.
Noah and his flood occurred when the Egyptians where going about their cultural and religious practices that continued afterwards; and, their religion was not replaced by the flood family’s immediate ancestors, fanning out from the ark. The Pharaohs and their gods continued unabated. No Yahweh? More incest?
The Chinese culture and writing developed along a continuum and they too were never taken the religion of Yahweh from the Middle East, by Noah’s relatives.
And, the ancient Britons and Australians failed to notice they were meant to be dead.
The New Testament, if it is read, critically, is inconsistent and evolves over time.
Indeed, the gospels were not written for decades after the death of this Jesus, whose birth and death are still questionable and no date can be asserted with clarity.
There was no census when Herod was alive, that story was made up after the event to allow the Nazarene to be born in the town of David. Nazareth was not a town in the first century and was only “discovered“ when Constantine’s mother, Helena, went looking for it. The gospel writers mistook the word Nazarene for a town. And there are many problems with the census and the way it is told. Because it was written as fact over one hundred years after the supposed birth of this Jesus. More fiction?
And, boulders weren’t placed in front of tombs until about 50 years after his death, was he a fiction based on one of many rabbis around at the time?
And, the crucified were left to rot on the cross/pole on which they were hung as a warning to insurrectionists? No empty tomb, it’s a fiction to turn a myth into a “fact”. To turn a dead man or a fictional man into god.
Pilate was, in real history, recorded history, a truly nasty contemptuous man, he would never have allowed the process of crucifixion as a warning to have been undermined. And, the alleged trial is a tale of the blood cult of scapegoating. Even Barabbus was a literary device representing scapegoating, suggesting it never occurred. Barabbus means, son of the teacher, or son of the father. The gospel writers where representing the two characters as essentially the same, one became the goat sacrifice. And, the twist was that the Jews shouted to let the murderer go, allowing the blame for Jesus’s death to be placed on the Jews and not the imperial Romans. It was very much a political narrative because the Jews and Romans where essentially at war, the destruction of the Temple in 70AD/CE, and this new sect/cult needed to distinguish themselves from the Jewish troublemakers, and the ongoing violence of the time.
Paul never knew Jesus and only depicted him as a spiritual vision. He knew nothing of the man and nothing of his life or his teachings. More evidence that the Chrestos (anointed) was mythical?
The first time the gospels were mentioned was in 180AD/CE by Irenaeus. Indeed, a very prominent Christian, Theophilus, said that he came to believe in Jesus from reading the Jewish Scriptures or, Torah. No mention of the gospels, no quoting of anything Jesus allegedly said. Best date for the gospels is circa, 170-182AD/CE. The myth of the god man Jesus was created over many years. But, Mark was first written, not until at least 70AD/CE, say Christian scholars but, as above, likely much later.
No record of the star of Bethlehem, of the graves emptying, or the sky darkening. It’s fiction.
Theists may need to believe in this lie. Still, it’s a lie.
Theists have the bible read to them. Atheists read the bible themselves.
Who knew a god of truth would be so contradicting.
The Father isint BS at all.. The book we are talking about for sure is
Jesus also said "Make disciples of all nations". He didn't just say convert them but make disciples of them. In order to do this a certain amount of teaching is surely required.
In rejecting all competing gospels, Paul is actually being consistent with Jesus who warned that many will lead you astray.
The "competing gospel" that Saul rejected was the real Gospel of Jesus given by the real Apostles. Keep up. Search up "Paul the antichrist" for all the scriptural references showing Saul's gospel to be false.
Interesting! I've never seen a take like this and it's quite fascinating.
😂😂that sounded sarcastic
@@tevitavibose6539 I'm not sure where you got sarcasm from.
I love how whenever Paul discusses Jesus’ teachings, he ONLY quotes hallucinations that he attributes to being Jesus. He never quotes Jesus directly, nor anyone who knew him.
Very interesting, it's like I need to read the Bible in a totally different way, like what does Jesus actually say and what comes from people like Paul.
1 Corinthians 15:3-11 Paul is quoting the original disciples.
@@phun1901 the OP clearly states *whenever Paul discusses Jesus’ teachings* ; the passage you reference is only a recap of Jesus death and resurrection and exhortation to believe that Jesus died for our sin. No direct or indirect mention of Jesus’ actual teachings.
“3For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance a : that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5and that he appeared to Cephas, b and then to the Twelve. 6After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, 8and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.
9For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them-yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me. 11Whether, then, it is I or they, this is what we preach, and this is what you believed.”
@teijaflink2226 yu think yu can understand Saint PAUL...
Saint Peter tells us..that is very hard!!
Read 2 PETER 3: 15-16
@@mwola Funny, sure seems like Jesus said there are no “saints”, no instructors, we’re all siblings
This feels like church for atheists and I’m here for it😂
Is it already April Fools Day?
Jesus is the Son, but Paul is a deceiver
@@jonathondyson8813 and you're uninformed
@@corundergroundreligion8190 how so?
@@jonathondyson8813 to say Paul is a deceiver shows you have not read Paul.
FYI: I just found your channel yesterday. And I am all over it. I have not commented so much in such a short time, since I came across your channel. It resonates with me so well. So, I have been stalking your videos and shorts like crazy. Thanks for them and sharing. It is so important for women in particular to question religion and all its forms.
2 Peter 3:14-18
Final Exhortation and Doxology
14 Therefore, beloved, while you are waiting for these things, strive to be found by him at peace, without spot or blemish; 15 and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation. So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, 16 speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures. 17 You therefore, beloved, since you are forewarned, beware that you are not carried away with the error of the lawless and lose your own stability. 18 But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity. Amen.
I just wanted to let you know your videos have been extremely eye opening and you break it down so easily. Thank you!
Videos like this are dangerous because of the confusion they lead people to have. If you have to explain that this is just your opinion, you shouldn't be saying anything.
Videos like this are dangerous baby. When I was wrapped up watching vids like this all the time , let me tell you I was lost, into tarot cards, living in darkness, lost my fate, confused!! I had to snap out of it. When I started to see the light again blessings came my way. So just be careful some people will lead you to astray, because it happened to me
I do find it sketchy that the person who was "loudest" in spreading the message about Jesus was the apostle (?) who never actually met him.
Paul just wrote the most. Peter, John, and James were all at least as instrumental.
He drowned out the ones who did. Peter and James were very active in trying to continue the church Jesus built. Paul hijacked it and turned into something completely different.
Yes, Paul, “doth protest too much.”
@@Pushing_Pixels Yeah it went from a religious from the teachings of Jesus about salvation being though peace and love and doing good to salvation being about believing JC was god and would save you. Paul raped the teaching of Jesus and made it his own religion.
Pushing_Pixels - What did Paul teach that you think conflicted with St. Peter, James, or any of the Apostles?
I see a female counselor. I prefer it. I was telling a guy I work with. He said "make sure you see a man, because it's not biblical for a man to be instructed by a woman." I looked at him like he was crazy . He was straight up serious. The view towards women in Christianity has always been an issue for me. Among several other things. I love your videos. Thank you!
Your instincts were correct. He is crazy.
Women can help in some things, counseling a man is not one of them. Men are the light of God, our wives should be the glory of us and we be the glory of Christ just as Christ is the glory of the Father
Just come out and say women are valued less than men in Christian ideology. Disgusting how some men can only feel good about themselves if they put women down.
@@WylesWitness11 What kind of counseling do you think OP was talking about and what kind is prohibited in the bible? Because I’m pretty sure the bible never talks about mental health therapy.
What kind of counselor we talking?
Excellent content. Love your wisdom and sincerity.
This has been by far the most striking and persuasive of your videos. I think back to my dad praising the theology of Paul and reacting strongly against my transformative experience of week at a Love & self-sacrifice focused Bible camp and now things become clearer. I have not heard this distinction drawn with such clarity before, but I think you have your finger on something very important.
Anybody that is false is you not Paul go a read your bible
@user-iz8np3vv4i @AliciatheCho @nannafish @desiknowsbest7777 @allansayers2565
@oshausen @williespilman6237 @go_aurasword @bryantaylor7820 @chrystallapsomas2030 @user-je8iw3jw4s @Valeriaduranruiz @jknick04 @christopherpdearing and many more
Shaul never said, "YHWH told me to say,,," or "YHWH sent me,,,"
NO ! Instead, he created his own Torah after a crash course with Kepha.
Gal 1:18 Then after three years I went up to Yerushalayim to learn from Kĕpha, and remained with him for fifteen days. What! Did He get a "Masters Degree? A Doctorate's Degree? NO.
Rom 14:5 One indeed judges one day above another, another judges every day alike. Let each one be completely persuaded in his own mind. He says to FOLLOW YOUR CONSCIENCE, ! THAT is NOT from YHWH.
Rom 14:14 I know and am persuaded in the Master יהושע that none at all is UNCLEAN of itself. But to him who regards whatever to be UNCLEAN , to him it is CLEAN. AGAIN, NOT TORAH, BUT YOUR CONSCIENCE.
1Co 7:12 "And to the rest I say, NOT the Master:..." speaking NOT FROM TORAH.
1Co 7:25 "And concerning maidens: I have no command from the Master, but I give judgment..." NOT FROM TORAH. 1Co 7:39 A wife is bound by Torah as long as her husband lives, and if her husband dies, she is free to be married to whom she desires, only in the Master. 1Co 7:40 But she is better off if she remains as she is, according to my opinion. And I think I also have the Spirit of Elohim.
2Co 11:17 "What I speak, I speak not according to the Master, but as in foolishness, in this boldness of boasting..." NOT FROM TORAH.
Gal 5:2 See, I, Sha’ul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Messiah shall be of no use to you." That is against the Torah, NOT FROM the TORAH.
Fake-Shaul said this, Rom 2:16 "...in the day when Elohim shall judge the secrets of men through יהושע Messiah, ACCORDING TO MY GOOD NEWS." He just said that his good news TRUMPS YHWH'S LAW. Pretty gutsy don't you think?
We have no use for Fake-Shaul
There is nothing off with Paul.
Most of these statements she's claiming about Paul are simply Paul quoting the prophets and scriptures.
The one for Lord lord he quoted Joel.
The one for where it's says God shows mercy to whom ever he chooses, he quoted the scripture where God was telling that to Moses.
We can clearly see Paul was only quoting and expanding a point.
So if you say Paul is contradicting, you mean to say that the old testament prophets were deceivers?well certainly not
So does that mean Jesus was contradicting the prophets and law?
Definitely NOT!
Read Matthew 5:17
So you ask, " how come it seems as though they are contradicting each other?"
The answer is : they are NOT contradicting each other, it's the context which was different.
E.g :
All those who call Lord lord will be saved indeed if they have a sincere heart.
Jesus was showing that others may call onto his name but will not be saved because they were not sincere while Paul was specifically talking about those with a sincere heart.
No contradiction!!!
Just context
May the Holy spirit guide you to rightly devide the word of Truth
TEXT WITHOUT CONTEXT IS PRETEXT TO WRONG TEXT.
Stay blessed ❤️and don't be deceived by random people on TH-cam
@@user-nt9bi7ix2p
Advent of the False Messiah.
Proof Ref:
Mat 24:4, 5, Mat 24:5, 24 - 27, Luk 21:8
Act 9:3 - 7, 2Cor 11:14 Isa 14:12,
Mat 24:26 “So if they say to you, ‘Look, He is in the desert!’ do not go out; ...!’ do not believe.
What are the signs of the false Messiah? He says;
I am the Messiah
I am he
I am Yahushua.
Where are we to be on guard for the misleader?
In Jerushalem.
On a Mt. top.
In a wilderness or desert.
Fake-Saul(=Faul) said, "look, he is out in the desert, I met a 'flash of light'(the very name of Helel/ lucifer)," with my ears ringing, The lightning said that he was Yahushua, the lightning was not a even a person, and none of the men heard a voice. The Torah requires two or three Witnesses for every major event especially a crime. What F'aul has done is a crime. He accepts the Torah go against the Torah, and how can we accept the word of one man with no Witnesses?
FYI, about 3 years ago lightning struck a tree only 20 ft away from me. My ears were ringing and my eyes hurt. If I said Yahushua spoke to me, should you believe and follow me if I wrote a bunch of letters? no. Why believe this fake?
Faul never said, "YHWH told me to say,,," or "YHWH sent me,,,"
He created his own Torah after a crash course with Kepha/Peter. He wrote that he was for and against both oral and written Torah. He contradicted himself.
Gal 1:18 Then after three years I went up to Yerushalayim to learn from Kĕpha, and remained with him for fifteen days.
What! Did He get a "Masters Degree?
A Doctorate's Degree?
NO.
It is impossible to follow "YHWH & Yahushua," and follow Faul with 40 oppositions and contradictions.
@@user-nt9bi7ix2p
Advent of the False Messiah.
Proof Ref:
Mat 24:4, 5, Mat 24:5, 24 - 27, Luk 21:8
Act 9:3 - 7, 2Cor 11:14 Isa 14:12,
What are the signs of the false Messiah? He says;
I am the Messiah
I am he
I am Yahushua.
Where are we to be on guard for the misleader?
In Jerushalem.
On a Mt. top.
In a wilderness or desert.
Mat 24:26 “So if they say to you, ‘Look, He is in the desert!’ do not go out; ...!’ do not believe.
Fake-Shaul(=Faul) said, "look, he is out in the desert, ( did you get that??? ) he met a 'flash of light'(the very name of Helel/the-false-messiah)," with his ears ringing, The lightning said that "he" was Yahushua, the lightning was not a even a person, and none of the men heard a voice.
The Torah requires two or three Witnesses for every major event especially a crime. What F'aul has done is a crime.
How can any one who accepts the Torah/Word-of-YHWH, go against it, and accept the opposite of YHWH's instructions presented by this one man who had no Witnesses to his claim?
[ FYI, about 3 years ago lightning struck a tree only 20 ft away from me. My ears were ringing and my eyes hurt. If I then "said Yahushua spoke to me," should you believe and follow me if I wrote a bunch of letters? no. Why believe this fake, Because he said so? ]
Faul never said, "YHWH told me to say,,," or "YHWH sent me,,,"
He created his own Torah after a crash course with Kepha/Peter. He wrote that he was for and against both Oral and Written Torah. He contradicted himself.
Gal 1:18 Then after three years I went up to Yerushalayim to learn from Kĕpha, and remained with him for fifteen days. What! Did He get a "Masters Degree? A Doctorate's Degree? NO
It is impossible to follow "YHWH & Yahushua," and follow Faul with 40 oppositions and contradictions.
YES, just saw you commented back on tiktok about this one being in the works! Love your content, it’s helped me TREMENDOUSLY
I wonder if there are any conspiracy theories that Paul was a con man. Like, he was out persecuting Christians, and he found some that were enjoying financial and social benefits and decided he wanted a piece of the action, and he knew that an emotional conversion story would be compelling. It would explain why he seemed more interested in molding the church to the needs of patriarchy rather than the actual teachings of Jesus.
There are a lot of people that assume paul was a con man of sorts.
Paul defended his right to make money preaching the gospel and even seemed to lie to some of his churches about receiving offerings and gifts that he admitted to receiving to other churches. I'll do a deep dive sometime soon and talk about this more in depth! You're definitely on to something there!
There was a book accusing Paul of being an opportunist who wanted to run his own religion.
A lot of what he wrote is consistent with that.
The only evidence that he was even persecuting them is his own claim. I'm not saying he was a conman, but we certainly don't have any real evidence he wasn't.
I'd buy that except according to The Bible Paul was eventually beheaded for professing The Christian Faith However I never really liked The Apostle Paul because his teachings have gotten Hundreds of Billions of Christians senselessly killed thruout History.
@@thing1thing2themediamaniac43 "according to the bible." If he was a charlatan, he was professing his con, so that doesn't actually mean anything, even if he actually was executed. If you want to suggest he wouldn't "die for a lie," you need to show that he was both executed and that he was given an option.
He also could have just been nuts. 🤷♂️
I would definitely like another video on Paul. From my earliest encounters with him, I felt there was something "off".
th-cam.com/video/5GobYh6Px08/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/wZpxz9uNwgs/w-d-xo.html
There is nothing off with Paul.
Most of these statements she's claiming about Paul are simply Paul quoting the prophets and scriptures.
The one for Lord lord he quoted Joel.
The one for where it's says God shows mercy to whom ever he chooses, he quoted the scripture where God was telling that to Moses.
We can clearly see Paul was only quoting and expanding a point.
So if you say Paul is contradicting, you mean to say that the old testament prophets were deceivers?well certainly not
So does that mean Jesus was contradicting the prophets and law?
Definitely NOT!
Read Matthew 5:17
So you ask, " how come it seems as though they are contradicting each other?"
The answer is : they are NOT contradicting each other, it's the context which was different.
E.g :
All those who call Lord lord will be saved indeed if they have a sincere heart.
Jesus was showing that others may call onto his name but will not be saved because they were not sincere while Paul was specifically talking about those with a sincere heart.
No contradiction!!!
Just context
May the Holy spirit guide you to rightly devide the word of Truth
TEXT WITHOUT CONTEXT IS PRETEXT TO WRONG TEXT.
Stay blessed ❤️and don't be deceived by random people on TH-cam
There isn't. There's something off with this girl making the video. People who dog on Paul do it because he brings accountability to the faith in Jesus. People like this girl attack Paul so they can live life without the church, without principles and without "guilt" from not doing the things we as Christians are supposed to do.
She is a deceiver. Don't get roped in. I know it's easy when we see videos that affirm what we want to believe. But she is completely wrong.
Sanguinesoulful, regardless of what Paul worshippers/followers aggressively command, you don't need Paul's opinions. Only what The Savior said matters. The only voice we should listen to is The Savior. The Savior does not need an arrogant, deceptive Benjaminite with an Absalom complex (a male Jezebel) to "expound" or explain His teachings. Paul's worshippers will fight hard for him, lol! They do it to force you to believe that without Paul, you can't be saved or know The Savior.
@@DisneyGator Honestly the more I read about Paul the more I get sure that he is lying ..I do not believe for a second his vision Jesus are true and even if they were how do we know he really did speak to Jesus or the devil. There was a reason actual apostle of Jesus were against him and his teachings
Very talented commentary. Well illuminated. Bless you.
i think it's a good bet that in actual fact, Paul was actually suffering from a frontal lobe seizure, maybe brought on from looking directly at the Sun on the road to Damascus, it would explain his temporary blindness, and his halluncinations, and change of personality, if Paul was around today, a medical team would almost certainly diagnose him with a fairly well known brain ailment that caused him to believe he had a vision. Great video Kristi, I'm so glad i found you and subscribed. Exellent stuff. Watching from the UK.
I've heard that theory. I think it's a good one to consider!
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV, women are 200% more likely to experience conversion psychosis. Paul doesn’t really fit the bill. Furthermore, researchers have estimated the number of patients with ongoing symptoms of conversion disorder to be 2 to 5 individuals per every 100,000 patients per year. Given the rarity of the condition, we would need strong evidence to demonstrate that this is really the case.
The speculation of the epileptic seizure. The problem with this theory is that complex visual hallucinations related to epilepsy are incredibly rare in adults. Adults who are affected by these things typically experience them as children first. The age of onset for epilepsy is generally either in childhood or from the age 60 onwards. Paul would’ve been outside of these age ranges.
Furthermore, adults and children who hallucinate during seizures are in the minority. It’s critical to differentiate between things like blindness, flashing lights, and foggy vision from things like hallucinating a talking person. Some medical literature calls both of those things hallucinations, but clearly the latter is much less common than the former. In other words, we’re talking about a rare symptom of a rare disorder presenting at an anomalous age. In addition, the specificity of the apostle Paul’s vision doesn’t match typical hallucinations which tend to be far more random. In the case of Paul, he saw the despised Jesus, in glory, rebuking and commissioning him.
Also, Paul’s temporary blindness was also unlikely to be related to epilepsy. This is because ictal blindness is most often observed in children and is very rare in adults unless they have symptomatic epilepsy, where the cause is known. That is not accounted for in the biblical story, and it would not last for three days.
Moreover, severe bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychotic breaks, and so forth seem incompatible with a well-educated, intelligent person in a leadership position traveling throughout the Greco-Roman world, planting churches.
Preacher "types" have been faking divine encounters for centuries prior to biblical times. Why would Paul be any different? Just sayin. If it happened for real, then religion is still a mess. If it didn't happen, a huge portion of humanity has been (& will continue to be) "duped" purposefully. To do harm. I bet even Paul/Saul (whatever) had no clue his grift would gain as much traction for as long as it did or ruin earth's potential for a beautiful history the way it has. Harm, wars, evil, greed. Hood going Paul.... #F-thatGuy
The blindness story is Luke’s, not Paul’s. Paul wrote only that Jesus appeared to him, the same way Jesus appeared to Peter, etc.
Luke embellished the story significantly.
Those mentioned in the qur'an could just as easily have been referring to Paul when they pointed out, "you follow nought but madmen and liars".
I heard some doctor on a radio programme saying that they were pretty confident in being able to diagnose, if not exactly what happened to Saul/Paul, but a ballpark type of seizure.
LOVE YOUR CHANNEL!!! 52 year old former Pentecostal here. Great content.
Happy you're here! :)
@@jezebelvibesI’m happy you’re here. You have more courage than I do. So much of what the evangelical churches teach is similar to what the Roman Catholic Church teaches. Hell, anti abortion, anti birth control, sexism, homophobia, transphobia are some of the things evangelical churches and the Catholic Church have in common. I’m sure there are many others. An angry sky daddy comes to mind, too.
You cannot out psychologize the Bible for God not to throw you into hell for all eternity. In other words, you cannot come up with a good enough excuse here and now, so you will not be able to on judgment day. If you say you did not want to be born, God is going to say you should’ve been born again, that means become a Christian so that’s not gonna work. And there are no other excuses try to think of one. So now you know for the first time in your life, that the Bible is smarter than you and it is a steel trap, smarter than all of mankind, What should you do then? So at least investigate and look to see that these things are true, because right now you just learned the Bible is smarter than you, and you will be accountable for your life on judgment day before God!
Prophecy, the Bible is 27% prophecy, that’s future history written in advance. God‘s really sticking his neck out to get it cut off if he’s wrong, but he hasn’t been wrong about the thousands of prophecies that were fulfilled, so he’ll be right about the end of the world prophecies as well and you’ll have no excuse on judgment day for not looking for truth!
Caveat: you cannot look for God in times of chaos says Isaiah 45:19, so you better do it now. In other words,You’ll be too worried about your own survival when chaos hits, than your eternal destiny!
Statistic probability of 40 writers writing the Bible with zero margin of deviation, proves God wrote the Bible through the 40 writers!
God authored the Bible!
DNA does not auto encrypt, the code writer is outside of the code of the 3300000,000,000 lines of computer code in the human genome of our DNA! So who wrote the code to such sophistication?
1,000,000 seconds is 12 days, 1,000,000,000 seconds is 32 years! That’s the difference between 1 million and 1 billion!
One person’s DNA could fill the Grand Canyon up to 50 times full of books. John 21:25 “I suppose everything Jesus did, the world wouldn’t have enough room for the books telling of it.“ this verse would be fulfilled!
Psalm 139:16 “in my members you have written many books“!
Psalm 139 is about the human body!
@@loisprew8820Yes, sky daddy is ALWAYS angry. I always wondered why you don’t see all of the fruits of the spirit in him that he requires of us: Love, Joy, Peace, Longsuffering, Gentleness, Goodness, Faith, Meekness, Temperance. He certainly lacks joy and peace.
@@dinard38 he lacks all the other traits, too.
Very, very interesting video. Really gets you thinking.
Thank you for sharing the truth
This is not the truth. It's pure heresy. This lady is confusing and deceiving you.
Thank you for your courage and for what you are doing with these videos!!
2 Peter 3:16
He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
Could you be specific? What did Kristi distort?
@@oscargordon I did not say anything really ! All I did is show the scripture; (2 Peter 3:16)!
Paul never contradicted Jesus !
But even back in the days while the Apostle Paul was still alive Ignorant and unstable people did the same thing Kristi is doing !
But Kristi is doing it on purpose because she as an agenda !
@@nanoffyourbesyness9577 Kristi presented a bunch of examples of how what Paul says differed from the teachings attributed to Jesus in the Gospels. I asked for specifics and your reply was “I did not say anything really!”, just a quote from a document written in Peter’s name.
You refused to address any of the examples presented. Is that because you know you can’t? Is this a case of “Well my preacher could explain it but I can’t”? Who is the unstable one here? Who demonstrates what the Bible actually says here?
“The epistle is traditionally attributed to Peter the Apostle, but most scholars consider the epistle pseudepigraphical (i.e., authored by one or more of Peter's followers in Ancient Rome, using Peter as a pseudonym) Scholars estimate the date of authorship anywhere from 60 to 150 AD.”
Please address your take on ANY of the examples that Kristi presented.
What is Kristi's agenda? Trying to inform people of what the Bible actually says as opposed to what preachers have been telling people what it says?
@@nanoffyourbesyness9577 can you specify refute anything she said?
This implies that just reading the Bible might not provide the truth . It needs a sound interpretation to have a consensus
I'm new to this and I'm reading Acts for the first time and something felt off about Paul, so I came looking to see if other people thought so and it's quite a rabbit hole.
I would love to hear your version of the gospel if you think Paul preached a false gospel. What must we do to be saved? How is a person made righteous? How does one inherit eternal life?
Fantastic lecture. THANKS
As someone who joined the J Witnesses for over 2 years during my teenage years, I have to say this: they seemed to quote Paul more than Jesus. That was one of the issues I had before leaving. I still agreed with them more than the others but decided that no church could contain me. I grew a beard (another point of contention with them) and learned how to read Hebrew and Greek. Today, in my 40s, I say that a congregation is a room full of people who haven't done enough research to ditch this primitive mythological nonsense
Halleluyah Will. Well done, brother.
Glad you left that. JWs are NOT Christians.
You are following a false prophet, come to the triune God that is true God reveals in Jesus our Lord
It seems you have become an atheist because of people. Nobody should decide the way how your relationship with God the Almighty should be. Being raised as Orthodox Christian, I joined the JW at the age of 21 but after years went by , I have come to realize that religion is not made by God. However, apart from the way it has been wrongly interpreted and changed through translation according to how it suits every christian denomination, the Bible remains to be God's word. So now I am very happy in the way I communicate with God and lead my life according to his will. I don't need anyone but God because there is nothing I fear as long as I believe in him. People are people and they are just like me. So no one has the right to dictate your life, even God himself doesn't interfere with the choices we make. That is why Salvation is freely given to us through God's grace by giving his only begotten Son, Jesus Christ as Ransom to cleans our sins.
Try Islam with open mind and proper genuine knowledge and understanding. Let your intellect and deeper reason/logic lead you. Then have a sincere prayer to Almighty God to guide you to the truth where ever it is. Accept God's guidance when He manifests it to you.
Kristi, you should do a review of the story of Moses. I am particularly interested in your take on the Lord's plan to kill Moses, how he was spared, and then how the Lord hardened the heart of the Pharaoh so that he would not listen to the Lord's command to let the Israelites go.
Moses was the 650yo guy who had baby foreskin rubbed on his feet while Master Shredder looked on really really pleased? And appeased? That fella?
In general when I hear someone say "to be honest", I conclude that normally they lie.
When one says "I am not lying" it is a sure sign that person is lying.
It is for me to judge if what I hear is truth or lie.
Interesting you should say that. Because Paul says on more than one occasion “I lie not” but then goes on to admit he is a liar (Romans 3:7, 2 Cor. 12:16). The false prophets are known by their fruit and Paul’s fruit is deceptive, lukewarm and lawless.
Hurray for you. Yes, do another video on Paul. Love it.
One of the things that caused severe anxiety when I was younger was attempting to reconcile the words of Paul, Jesus, and James in what was supposed to be a flawless, seamless document in total harmony with itself.
You got it all wrong lady you need to go back and study the life of Jesus study everything everything about the apostle to the nation's Paul. When Paul was stopped while on his way to persecute the people of the way in Damascus he became a member of the way after that you were talking so fast that you missed out completely that a great friendship got started between Jesus and the apostle Paul there was no room for this unfortunate situation your trying to bring in. From when Paul started to learn about the Way, he had to learn about this New way that Jesus WAS a part of and Jesus will not allow this New friendship to go the way you're trying to make it look Jesus and Paul saw a beautiful friendship started in any case a good cooperation was needed for Paul to be an apostle to the nation
Also at Matt 23:9-10 Jesus a perfect righteous man is setting up principles that this early Christian congregation needs was warning these new or inexperienced disciples about things they should avoid like people referring to them as father because one father is in the heavens already God Jehovah neither be called leader because I Jesus am your leader only one leader is needed also the greatest among you must be your minister. Minister IN THIS sense means one taking the lead in helping other not Lording IT over others. I'm using the New World Translation of the Holy SCRIPTURE it explains words so that you get the true meaning of what God intended for us to read especially ther at Matt 23. One must remember the New Christian era is starting there are old troubles within the old religious order that Jesus the leader is trying to remove without creating disunity among the New congregation
Please stop coming to conclusion about Jesus and Paul. If you read the bible carefully you will get the point that Jesus and Paul will have to work well to accomplish good thing for the New era or the way for now and remember the true God Jehovah is a part of all of this New friendship is being enhanced the Jewish system will no longer be there God is turning his attention to the New way . Remember what Jesus said TO the Samaritan woman John 4:22 you worship what you do not know vs 23 we will worship with spirit and truth. This is New this will take place in 33ce New era so Jesus who is the leader hear is setting up principles that will the everyone must follow SO there was no pushing and pulling between Jesus and Paul everything was well organized and in order. Jesus is the son of God leader. God Jehovah is father. The disciples are the followers of the way soon the Christian congregation, those are the rules or principles to follow .If I may. Please acquire the New World Translation of the Holy Scripture. It's a very authentic bible translation. This was shown in the game show Jeperdy by the late Alex Trebec a few years ago.
Oh one more taught. All followers of Jesus will be preachers and teachers Matt 24:14. 28:19 20. WHAT Jesus said there at Matt 23:9-- was not telling them I will be the only teacher. Jesus WAS helping them to separate themselves from the PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE WAY who want to be called rabbi and leaders and father. You will not be like them. This is New, remember Paul will be eating meat that God have cleanse. ACTS 10:13-- Paul will be an apostle to the nation that's why he was stopped while on his way to persecute those of the way in Damascus, he became a member of the way and a very supportive disciples throughout his career as a apostle to the nation. Holy spirit was poured out on him also in 33ce. So there WAS NO animosity between Jesus and Paul. Jesus WAS in the heavens as leader of the new Christian congregation, Paul was on the earth as the apostle to the nation
@@charlespermaul6966Perfect
Peter also performed miracles. Was he also a false prophet? No. Probably because he was part of the 12 apostles.
Why do you think Paul was a false prophet? Possibly because he wasn’t part of the 12.
Did Jesus appear to other people after his death? Answer is yes.
[ John 20:19, 20:26-31, Matt 28:9-10, 28:16-20, Luke 24:13-32, 24:36-43, Acts 1:3-8, Luke 22:44-49 ]
Is it possible he appeared to Paul. Answer is yes [ Acts 9 esp v5, Gal 1:11-17* ]
About the deception Jesus said Many will come in my name claiming "I am the Messiah”
Did Paul claim he is the messiah? No. The DECEPTION was in people CLAIMING they are the “Messiah”.
Do not add any sentiments to this.
If Jesus will watch a LIAR/IMPOSTER write more books and teach Jesus to many than any of the 12, it is up to Him.
JESUS NEVER SAID PEOPLE WILL CLAIM TO SPEAK FOR ME min 3.00. If Jesus doesn’t want people to talk on HIS BEHALF, he shouldn’t have sent the disciples into all nations(Matt 28:18-20). He should do that HIMSELF. By that logic, dont teach anyone about Christ.
He said people will claim I AM THE MESSIAH. Paul never claimed that. He always made sure to exalt the Christ.
If Paul cast out demons and performed miracles, didn’t Jesus give believers that power. If means Jesus must be the Master Deceiver. Paul’s mission was not about casting out devils, or making miracles, His mission was to preach Christ to the Gentiles even though he did those things Jesus told the disciples to do such as healing the sick and performing miracles.
According to your knowledge about the elect being only Jews. The Church is a called out group, also meaning elect. Jesus after his resurrection told them to teach all nations(Matt 28:18-20). What you are saying is so wrong.
The tangent you are leaning on is so slippery. It also gives credence to the fact that the new testament (apart from the life and deeds of Jesus in the 4 gospels) should be discredited.
You read Matthew 23:8-10 without context. Read from 1-10 and come again.
Jesus was against the Pharisees doing things to be seen of men and their love for Greetings in the streets as Teachers.
In the book of 1Timothy, (read from chapter 2 v 1 - 6)
Paul writes a letter to Timothy, telling him of God’s purpose for his(Paul’s) ministry.
*** Do you see a man who is calling himself the “Messiah" or one who is acknowledging the Father and His Son from v1 - 6???
If Jesus didn’t want people to teach others after his resurrection, he wouldn’t have ordered them to make disciples of all Nations.(Matt 28:18-20)
TH-cam is easy to start, teaching truth is not, it requires revelation from God. The bible is an easy book to read. It is not plain to understand, especially the things about the Kingdom. It requires the Grace of God to understand. Many times after Jesus’ teaching, the disciples came to ask of the meaning of what he taught(Luke 8 esp 9-11, Mark 4 esp v10, Matt 13:3-12). Even Peter acknowledged that what Paul taught was hard to understand. 2 Peter 3:15-16.
Did the early Church deem Paul as a false teacher/prophet? No. If he was a false prophet then even those who followed Jesus have been deceived because they believed his experience, revelation and writings about the Christ. Gal1:18-24
When Paul talked of dying to himself, it didn’t mean he was no longer called Paul or he was no longer a human. He meant his will has been superimposed by the Lord’s will for him. He therefore had no desire to follow through on his will because the will of God became paramount to him. He was one who counted all things as dung for the excellency of the knowledge of God.
I could not even get past minute 8.35 of your video
May God help us to understand Him more each day.
Another great deep dive. Paul has always driven me crazy. He always seemed to be the person who lives a terrible life, and then pivots and tries to tell everyone else how to live theirs.
Donald Trump.
@@undrwatropium3724His cult certainly brings up questions about the morals of every prior religious icon.
I am not sure whether Paul was married or celibate? It must have been tough for him.
@@marinacitronova8604 Paul was an incel and he never knew Jesus.
The Bible is true after all and unfortunately, you’re gonna go to hell for not being a true seeker! “We all can’t be wrong “ Yes, according to the Prophetic timeline, you’re all wrong.!!!
You cannot out psychologize the Bible for God not to throw you into hell for all eternity. In other words, you cannot come up with a good enough excuse here and now, so you will not be able to on judgment day. If you say you did not want to be born, God is going to say you should’ve been born again, that means become a Christian so that’s not gonna work. And there are no other excuses try to think of one. So now you know for the first time in your life, that the Bible is smarter than you and it is a steel trap, smarter than all of mankind, What should you do then? So at least investigate and look to see that these things are true, because right now you just learned the Bible is smarter than you, and you will be accountable for your life on judgment day before God!
Prophecy, the Bible is 27% prophecy, that’s future history written in advance. God‘s really sticking his neck out to get it cut off if he’s wrong, but he hasn’t been wrong about the thousands of prophecies that were fulfilled, so he’ll be right about the end of the world prophecies as well and you’ll have no excuse on judgment day for not looking for truth!
Caveat: you cannot look for God in times of chaos says Isaiah 45:19, so you better do it now. In other words,You’ll be too worried about your own survival when chaos hits, than your eternal destiny!
Statistic probability of 40 writers writing the Bible with zero margin of deviation, proves God wrote the Bible through the 40 writers!
God authored the Bible!
DNA does not auto encrypt, the code writer is outside of the code of the 3300000,000,000 lines of computer code in the human genome of our DNA! So who wrote the code to such sophistication?
1,000,000 seconds is 12 days, 1,000,000,000 seconds is 32 years! That’s the difference between 1 million and 1 billion!
One person’s DNA could fill the Grand Canyon up to 50 times full of books. John 21:25 “I suppose everything Jesus did, the world wouldn’t have enough room for the books telling of it.“ this verse would be fulfilled!
Psalm 139:16 “in my members you have written many books“!
Psalm 139 is about the human body!
This is an excellent video
So glad to see this vidio. I have felt this way for 40 years. Great vidio
Love your work, Kristi. Keep it up!
I didn't want to answer, but I think keeping quiet could be more harmful, so I have to answer.
To begin, you're just butchering the Bible as you don't take time to learn, but let's look at your points.
I need to say this before:
*Having studied Paul's teachings scrupulously, I've found out that if there's a difficult teaching to follow, it's that of Paul. Paul gave a teaching in which there's no ground for sins anymore, because He said that believing in Christ is to become a new creature that must not be subject to sin in anyway (Galatians 2: 17, 5: 16-25; Romans 6: 1-6, 1Timothy 1: 8-11, 2 Corinthians 4: 1-5 ; ..., 1 Corinthians 15: 33; 6: 10-20; 13: 1-13; Romans 1: 26-31; ....). Paul didn't say works are void, He just taught that none of us (with our deeds) has deserved the Salvation which we are given through JESUS, but all have reached that salvation while all were to be condemned, so it's by mere Grace. And there are no works (or good deeds) you're asked for to come to that salvation in JESUS. And for Paul, if you have ever received that salvation then there's no ground for sin left in you, you must live a sinless life since you've put on the new man Jesus and you are no more like Adam, who chose to do his own will against GOD. You're now in the image of Christ who only did the Will of GOD. So by baptism, you're united to Christ so as to live like HIM crucifying the old nature to the cross of Christ. In Romans 7-8, you see Paul telling believers to henceforth become slaves of the Justice in GOD. Since you don't have time to learn before talking, you mix everything and claim things which make no sense.
Paul in 1 Corinthians 1: 18- 23, he spoke of people like you. And Hosea 4: 6 said that you're destroyed for the lack of knowledge, and that you have rejected knowledge and loved falsehood.* May GOD HELP YOU. AMEN.
1- JESUS didn't say what to who? Jews or Gentiles. Jesus didn't only say people should not be called teachers but also fathers. The point is that JESUS was simply warning his disciples against pride that makes people claim titles for personal interests. He said that but people kept calling their dads "fathers", their instructors "Master" or "Teacher". Similar to what He taught about right and left cheek.
Try hard. Paul didn't teach that people should be asking others to call them by some sorts of titles. That's not part of the salvation. And the context of JESUS' message is clearly different from that of PAUL in Timothy. Please, learn how to reason with logic.😅
2- Indeed JESUS said that just calling Him "Lord Lord" won't allow people into the Kingdom, and that's very clear because in the passage, He reminded them that doing the Will of the FATHER. And what's the WILL of the FATHER? That people should believe in JESUS to be saved. What's "TO BELIEVE IN JESUS?" It's to accept Him in whatever He instructs. Read 1John 3.
3- Calvinist got it right? Like you, Calvinists thought the NT was originally written in verses😅. Reading the teaching of Paul from the end of Romans 8 through 11, we clearly see what Paul taught. Paul taught that all haven fallen short of the glory of GOD, and also none (of those who understand this) is sinless. So, originally, all would end in destruction, but GOD in His Mercy, made a plan which He carried through those who originally deserve punishment to bring about salvation for all mankind by showing us mercy through Jesus, who died as the expiratory sacrifice for mankind. Israel was chosen in that vision of GOD, since GOD would not choose all people for the purpose.
4- JESUS didn't only say He didn't come to abolish the Laws and Prophets, He also said He came to fulfill them... If you ever read the New Testament, Jesus on the Cross shouted that *all (about him) is fulfilled.* Paul didn't contradict JESUS, he just confirmed him. Jesus came to announce salvation through His blood, and to establish a New covenant in His blood, which He did. Therefore, from that moment, the Laws of Moses are fulfilled and what's established now is that of JESUS which is for salvation. In Deuteronomy 18: 17-18, the laws say that JESUS should be heard in whatever He would teach. And before JESUS died, the laws of Moses were prevalent, but after JESUS death and resurrection, the Law of Jesus came. And JESUS just made it clear that people should love one another. JESUS said you should hate your family compared to Him Jesus (not in the sense of hatred but preference). Meaning you cannot say you love JESUS but your love for your family is more valuable to you than to JESUS. Therefore, you won't do what your family ask you if it's against JESUS.
5- Marriage. Let no one separate what GOD united. Thank you, but remember that JESUS also said some people get married while others no. He even said "some are eunuchs from birth, some have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom" when the disciples were worried about the impossibility to divorce.
Paul's wish about celibacy was not a rule, and he went on to say that it's better you get married if you can't hold yourself.
Whether you're deliberately accusing Paul or you're just ignorant and lazy.
6- JESUS said people should love and pray for their enemies. Paul said the same (several times, e.g. Romans 12: 17-21..). Love is not lawlessness, you're mixing the two. GOD punishes His children not because He hates them but loves them. Paul said that the curse of GOD would be on those who come with another gospel, you know why? Those who bring another gospel are not just enemies but destroyers, and they would lead into destruction. Not because you love your enemy that when he comes to kill innocent children you would keep quiet, that would mean you don't know what's love of the enemy. As you're bringing another gospel, I am pretty sure you're triggered by such a passage. JESUS himself in John 10 remarked that those Paul is talking about are wolves and thieves. And the point is that, whether Paul said it or not, those false teachers are accursed.
7- Women keeping silent or not? Yeah, definitely, women should keep silent, but which women? Those who consider themselves as authority over their husbands. If you read the passage (in Timothy) well, you would notice Paul was talking about married women. And before that He already mentioned those who preach.😂 Paul worked with women such as Priscilla and others. Paul said the same about women who used to talk in church.
Paul said in Galatians and other places that in Christ there's no difference between man and woman when it comes to salvation and rights in Christ.
@@Christian-Hero This looks like a comment for the main thread under the video - not as a reply to my comment. Maybe try again? 🤷♀
@@ZachariahWiedeman It could help you, too, since you approve her message.. After all, you have free will.
May GOD HELP US, FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US IS GOING TO BE JUDGED WITHOUT THE HELP OF ANYONE.
it's better you be alright with GOD than with men.
I love this perspective, it articulates a lot of thoughts I’ve had about Paul and Jesus. Also please start a podcast, your monologue format is already perfect for it. You could just upload the audio of existing videos to get a back catalogue off the bat. ❤
Exactly…
1) Paul was Pagan who used to murder and imprison the true followers of Jesus because they reject false Gods such as the Trinity concept.
Acts 8:3
3 "But Saul began to destroy the church. Going from house to house, he dragged off both men and women and put them in prison."
Acts 22:4
4 "I persecuted the followers of this Way to their death, arresting both men and women and throwing them into prison."
2) Paul also lied about how he came to Jesus on the road to Damascus. Remember all my evidence is directly from the Bible...
Acts 9:7
7 "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."
Acts 22:9
9 "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me."
So which is it, did he saw a light or heard a voice? You think it was Jesus who came to him or the Devil who had a better idea to corrupt the teachings of Jesus from within?
@@thinkbeforeyoutype7106😂😂 Paul lied you said? No.
That passage even proved the authenticity of the story. The Writer reported what He heard from both Paul and those who were with Him.
@@Christian-Hero Paul was caught LYING about whether he “saw” or “heard” Jesus on the road to Damascus’s…
Acts 9:7
7 "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."
Acts 22:9
9 "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me."
You cross worshippers are deceitful hypocrites
@@thinkbeforeyoutype7106 What's funny is that you want Paul to narrate the story not as he experienced the event but as others did, amazing...
Maybe you're currently in the night seeing something in the sky, and I am in the afternoon seeing the same thing in the sky but from another angle and the appearance differs. And describing what we saw and how we saw it, there'll be differences in the reports, however our reports are about the same event....
Paul was the ONE who experienced the visitation, others just witnessed the superficial and apparent event.
When you're dreaming and you move your hands from left to right in the physical realm, those around you notice it, however, you would not know you did such in real world. You can even move until you fall from the bed before noticing it. You would surely say you moved but you don't know how you moved until you saw yourself on the ground, maybe it's rapidly or slowly.
The passages are not even contradicting each other, but we see someone reporting what happened to Paul in the first passage, and the latter one is the direct speech of Paul written down.
Stop being illogical because you're desperate to accuse someone. Not because you don't like someone that you need to lie about him to misrepresent him...
@@thinkbeforeyoutype7106 You show you know nothing about Christianity...Scripture says, Paul saw Jesus in his encounter with him on the road to Damascus, and the blindness inflicted on Paul's was thought Jesus appearance to him, which is accepted in Scripture as proof of Pauls encounter with him. This is backed up by an apostle that was unknown to Paul, who on the 3rd day of Paul's blindness was sent by Jesus to restore his sight [Acts 9:1-18].
So, clearly you don't know what you are talking about - in your desperate attempt to disprove Christianity you are blinded to statements that are evident in Scripture.
🚩So clearly Paul had proof (his temporary blindness) and a witnesses to his encounter with Jesus (the apostle Ananias who was told by Jesus to go to Paul and restore his sight). All the other apostles acknowledged this after Ananias told them Jesus appeared and struck Saul down with blindness on the road to Damascus, and that he (Ananias) had been ordered by Jesus to go to Saul's assistance. So we have Biblical documented statements of Paul's encounter with the real Jesus, supported by Jesus very own apostles.
⦁ Paul was healed from his blindness by a disciple called Ananias in Acts 9:17-18 “Ananias (…) entered the house; and (…) said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus (…) has sent me that YOU MAY RECEIVE YOUR SIGHT (…)” Immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he received his sight at once; (…)”.
🚩While Paul was not one of the original apostles, Acts 9 clearly shows that Jesus himself picks Paul to evangelize for him when he sends Ananias to restore Paul's sight, but Kristi Burke assumes Jesus mistakenly picked a man that would contradict him...really (LOL):
⦁ [Acts 9:15-16]; 15. But the Lord said to him (Ananias), “Go, for THIS MAN IS A CHOSEN VESSEL TO ME, to bear My name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel; For I will show him what great things he must suffer for My name.”
🚩Here you people are 2000 years later contradicting people who knew Paul with your unsupported personal views based on your own false beliefs, making claims like you are someone that has the knowledge to refute Scripture. When all you are doing is projecting your contemptuous views which is probably based on your own issues you had with your faith or people you knew in the faith.
So clearly it is clueless people like you that have heard a bit of Christian teaching that assumes you understand the faith...when in fact you are far of the mark and ignorant to its teachings. Comment on things you understand since you know nothing about this faith.
I appreciate your perspective in all your videos. You're very intelligent and rational. Thank you for your work!
Wow great eye opener
I too find Paul's writing apauling.
*rimshot*
LOL!
Wow
I don’t like Paul either (lots of grudges against the man), but one thing that not many people know is that Paul’s authentic letters are the earliest dated parts of the New Testament. Even earlier than the Gospels. This is despite the canonical ordering of the texts.
Paul’s Jesus is different from the gospel Jesus .
That is true. The "synoptic" gospels were written many decades after Jesus' death. Also remember, only Luke had any kind of education, and spoke and wrote in Greek. John Mark, Matthew and John were poorly- or uneducated disaffected youth, not gray haired, bearded older men. Consequently, they did not write the synoptic gospels themselves, but had what we now call "ghost writers." And how much had changed over the years of the telling of the stories?
@@johntiggleman4686Okay... I have some gripes with that. As far as we know the gospels were anonymous BUT the fact that they were written is solid evidence that they were written by educated GREEK elites. These were relatively well-off scribes or apprentices/servants of scribes who were writing fan-fiction stories of poor people from the Levant.
This is common throughout history- higher class people having pastoral fantasies of living idealistic peasant/fisherman lives. (Marie Antoinette comes to mind)
You are incorrect. Acts 10 shows there was Gospel copies distributed around during Peter's church. There never was multiple Gospels by multiple authors. The Gospel was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.
@@termination9353 nonsense.
I have been really enjoying your videos. It is good to know other people are finding things in the bible don't make sense.
What's funny about the "women should remain quiet" verse is that my former church would preach that verse but then say it wasn’t misogynistic because Jesus had female followers. So they'd use the conflicting passages to try to ease the sexism behind their teaching.
I was uncomfortable with how they viewed women my entire childhood and now that I've been out for 5 years as an adult I'm surprised I stayed that long. The brainwashing and fear is so strong in strict churches like the one I grew up in.
There is nothing wrong with having women be quite for an hour or two a week and think about something greater than them. The fact that women have a problem with this issue shows how narcissistic they are.
Paul had women follows Phoebe was a deacon a single woman had her own church some women were elders that verse about women being quiet and telling women to ask your husbands some women were single so he must said that because women were disrupting the meetings
I often called Paul jokingly "The Patron Saint of undercover agents". The way I see it, his theology made christianity less threatening to the Roman Empire. Especially considering the fact that he used to persecute early christians, his "Revelations" seems more like a change of tactics than a real change of hearts.
This is a fascinating point. You mention that Paul's tactics changed, but what were his ends? If Paul attacked Christianity because it was a Jewish heresy, wouldn't making it less Jewish have worked against him? You mention an appealingness to the Roman empire, could you elaborate? All I recall that Christians continued to be persecuted by pain of death under the empire until the Edict of Milan, 313AD, so I wouldnt have assumed that Christianity was all that appealing to them.
i dont know if it made it less threatening because in the end Paul got beheaded for his faith in Jesus, so I think his goal was to present the Christian beliefs exactly as they were intended to be, not compromising for the Roman Empire
@lemmingkingyt5618 the Jew and people during Jesus's day said the same thing about jesus. They didn't believe until christ left.
Could you elaborate on how Paul's ministry is less threatening to the Roman Empire?
I could potentially see a reference to Romans 13, but that's about it.
If anything, Paul's ministry and teaching made things worse for Christians under the empire. Consider his repudiation of circumcision in Galatians. Had he supported the Judaizers or even remained neutral on circumcision, he would have given Christians a chance to associate more directly with Judaism and therefore receive some of the social and political protections afforded to Jewish believers. Instead, he drives a wedge between the gospel and the law, increasing political vulnerability and forcing the young church to accept a deeply multicultural form.
@@stephenchristian5639 Yeah, I think he might have failed that in the short run, but in the long run, eventually the form of christianity Paul created was the one that became Rome's official religion.
Also, the fact that before Paul, there was still a debate wether non-jews could become christians or not, and Paul helped tip the balance in favor of non-jews becoming christians.
Considering that the same people that put Jesus to death were the same people that inevitably determined what it meant to be a Christian and eventually what books would be in the Bible, I have a hard time believing that they didn’t make a lot of changes to the gospels, as well as add the teachings of a false prophet to the New Testament.
Whether by "the same people that put Jesus to death" you mean the Jewish religious leaders or the Roman governors, either way those are NOT the same, or even connected to, the people who settled the canon of Biblical scripture.
And you may have a hard time believing that they didn't make a lot of changes to the Gospels, but there's no evidence of that occurring. Thanks to archaeological finds such as the Dead Sea scrolls, the evidence is overwhelming that the texts of the Gospels we read today do not differ in any significant way from the earliest known copies of the manuscripts. There is vastly more documentary evidence to support the reliability of the New Testament documents than there is of any other ancient writings. (By "reliability" I'm not referring to whether or not the Gospels are TRUE - that's a separate issue. "Reliability" here simply refers to the fact that we can confidently rely on the knowledge that the texts were accurately preserved and not subjected to any significant post script editing.)
Nice opinion any sources or facts to back it up?
@@JesusChristHML Back which part up? Crucifixion was specifically a Roman practice. Emperor Constantine oversaw the council of Nicaea, which determined what “Christians“ believe. Just look in the history books.
Constantine legalized Christianity in 313ad or somewhere around there, until then Christians were persecuted for their faith, pretty sure the final book to be written chronologically is probably revelation written 90s, guess you can claim they changed all the writings, but surely someone would have written this and I’m pretty sure there is no claim of this happening but everyone is entitled to believe whatever they choose,
@@gamingwithdad5774 Literally looked it up and in 5 minutes found out that the council of nicaea was about Arianism. Arianism proclaimed that Jesus was not divine and was a created being. Not about what books were in the bible.
Very well done.
Plain English without unnecessary drama. I felt that I was having a conversation with a thorough and thoughtful neighbor. Professional and relatable at the same time.
Yup!
You speak so beautifully ❤
Absolutely loving this…thank you so much for sharing your insights!! Very eye opening!! I hope more people listen to this!! ❤😊
He's not saying he is Jesus, he is saying that as a born again Christian Jesus lives in him, and not just in him, but in all Christians.
Jesus speaking:
John 14
19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.
20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
Whenever you quote scripture you always do it according to a selective narrative. You never include passages like this:
After a military victory against the Midianites Moses is angry with his generals for returning with too many prisoners:
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
(Numbers 31:17-18 King James Version)
@@douglascutler1037 yep, the OT was rife with narratives about the jews slaughtering other rival nations or tribes. since YHWH had "given them" certain lands which were inconvieniently ALREADY HELD BY SOMEONE ELSE. It only stands to reason those others just needed to be erased from the earth.
@@douglascutler1037 You've probably never heard this explanation, but check this out, cuz it's weird and kinda fun.
We might not talk about the Midianites much, but we do talk about the flood a lot, were EVERYBODY was killed, and only 8 people survived, not because they were good or bad necessarily, but because they had fully human DNA. Ever heard of the Nephilim? you know, the offspring of the Fallen Angels having sex with women? The Bible says there were Giants before and after the flood. That's because these races of giants were having sex with women, corrupting the pure human DNA of Adam and Eve. So God sent the flood to save Humanity's DNA thru Noah's family.
But the Fallen Angels and Nephilim where only males, and needed normal human women to reproduce, and their offspring were only males too. So, if you are tracking and do a bit of history research about the origins of the Midianites, the land they occupied, the children's sacrifices they practiced and the gods they worshipped, they fit the description of a tribe controlled and ruled by Giants, and perfectly explains why God killed the little Nephilim children and every woman that was old enough to have had sex with the giants and could've been pregnant. Notice how little girls were not killed cuz they could not have been pregnant of more giants, and females could not be nephilim. So there, that's the logical explanation from the Bible you probably won't believe, but now you know a possible reason.
Funny how the government is now saying they have in their possession alien ships, that ufos are real, archeologist are finding incredible megalithic structures and pyramids all over the world, all civilizations have a flood history and artwork representing giants and demigods, skeletons of giants have been found everywhere, from the USA to China and Peru, but nah, it's all a conspiracy and the Bible just is a fairy tale....
@@douglascutler1037u kinda did the same thing lol
@@vmirac-5270 But according to your own rules I only need to quote ONE scripture!
I only need to demonstrate ONCE a scripture showing factual or moral inconsistency. According to fundamentalist doctrine the Bible is perfect and free of error or inconsistency in ANY single fact, ideology or morality. Only one verse showing error calls the entire Bible into question. What is literal? What is fable? What is mythology? What is metaphorical? It's all open to interpretation.
Without a perfection of fact and morality the entire literal Bible concept tumbles down like a house of cards.
And there are thousands of verses to chose from. Bible says the first luminous day and night were created on the first day of creation and the sun on the the fourth day of creation. Oh, really? How does that work?
Obviously, the creation story is poetry by men of the day who had no idea of actually cosmology. And if it was written by God then God lied about his own creation which also disqualifies the Bible.
I was watching a PBS Documentary, Jesus to Christ, when it occured to me that Paul wasn't a follower of Jesus but a usurper. I guess you could say that Paul made Christianity go viral by adding his own *twist* and taking it to a bigger audience. I recently came upon your videos. Great observations!
The biggest lie is still that Jesus was referring to Yahweh as our God. A good part of the Gospels is about Jesus warning all people that he heals not to tell this to others. Because he new it would make it’s way to the Jewish Priests. And they would than ask him who gave him the power and he would have to say “Not Jahwe”. That it is the Jewish Priests who want to kill him first is all one really needs to know. It was not on which day he healed. It was about in who’s name he healed.
@@Rakscha-SunYou are 100% correct! Yeshua aka the fake English translation "Jesus" did NOT do anything in the fake YHWH (Yahweh) they now call "God" name. Let me unpack this a little bit. [major edits ~16 hours after initial post on 30 Dec 2023 @12:53 p.m. CDT on 1 Dec 2023 @4:44 a.m. CDT]
Yeshua means YHWH saves, and the correct English translation is Joshua, which is the same Hebrew name of Joshua son of Nun the Greeks had no issues translating many decades prior. The Greek, then the Latin, then the English translations of Yeshua's name in the Christian New Testament to "Jesus," have no actual meaning. The Greeks already translated the Hebrew Tanak we call Old Testament, so there is ZERO excuse for this purposeful butchery and then the fake insertion of doing anything in ANYONE's name other than to do something in STEADFAST LOVE, as a name is narcissistic garbage as no name is needed to do anything as seen clearly in Matthew 18:18 of each person's spoken word power on earth and on the things in heaven!
Yeshua's biological human parents were IGNORANT Yahweh subscribers and if they really did have a visit from an angel [and this angel was from the good 2/3 as opposed to the bad 1/3 spoken of in Revelation 12], then Matthew 1 clearly shows that their son's name should be Immanuel ["God" amongst us] NOT Yeshua [YHWH saves], which is OBVIOUSLY different. Nothing in the name Immanuel speaking about YHWH at all.
I have not read all the "prophets" and examined all their words under a microscope with my new found revelatory key, but I would say the people with YHWH as a part of their names [-ah such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Elijah, etc. were possibly more used by YHWH than people with -el in their names such as Daniel and Ezekiel]. But because everyone is now "God" and "Lord," no one can tell the difference. The Hebrew Elohim in Genesis 1:26-28 is different than the Elohim in Genesis 3:22-24. Even if you don't have Names of God (NOG) from Bible Gateway (that shows Elohim versus Yahweh Elohim), which I just checked it out starting 26 Nov 2023 and ran through Genesis 1-3 to see if they would accurately distinguish between YHWH (Satan)/"God" and Elohim (Father)[Parent]/One True Creator lumped in with "God," and thus far, they have rendered it accurately over those 3 chapters when things were less muddy.
Another fake insertion in Matthew 1 is the purposeful mistranslation of Isaiah 7:14 where as early as 3 BC, the Greeks were told by the Israelites aka Judahite ("Jews") that the Hebrew word almah (young woman) is what their text said, not the Hebrew word bethulah (virgin) that they translated to the Greek word parthénos (virgin). This is well over 70+ years before the gospels were written. They didn't even do a good fake job in Luke in the genealogy [but put something in parenthesis (supposedly the son of Joseph) to attempt to negate Joseph as the biological father in which they didn't even get the genealogy correct per Genesis 49:8-10 regardless of the curses YHWH attempted to put on the genetic bloodline of Judah (Jeremiah 22, etc.)].
My post isn't really about the wrong or purposeful mistranslation of Yeshua's name or the fake virgin birth [where Revelation 22:11-20, specifically v.16 rejected this and said he is the root and offspring of David aka genetically descended paternally through David as seen in Genesis 49:8-10, 1 Chronicles 17:11-15, etc.], but that the entity going by the name YHWH (EXODUS 3:13-14) is a liar and murderer. Yeshua [who had the One True Creator directly speaking out of his vocal cords] directly said that YHWH and Moses are THIEVES, ROBBERS, and Destroyers [John 10:7-14] and spoke against them and instead spoke about HIS Father [Parent] his entire ministry which is why they wanted to STONE him (Deuteronomy 17:1-7 and 19:15-20). This is why Pharisee Saul Paul of Tarsus traveled with two witnesses in persecution of the disciples/followers of the Way so he and them with others could stone these individuals for following another god other than YHWH as they did Stephen in Acts 8.
Numerous examples against YHWH being a liar and murderer (John 8:44 in context of John 8:31-47) from the beginning [if you want this then ask], but I will give you 2 examples:
*1. Direct Lie and Murder: Exodus 16:4* [in context of v.4-21] where YHWH claim he will give bread from heaven and test/tempt [Hebrew word for test and tempt as well as in the New Testament, the Greek word for test and tempt is the same word that the *modern day Pharisees work hard to hide due to James 1:13* ] the Israelites. *When the "Jews" spoke about their written Torah [which was OUTLAWED during the time of Yeshua] Exodus 16:4-21 about the bread from heaven that they got from Moses (YHWH- does people not find it odd, that even though Exodus 16:4 show YHWH is the one that is giving bread from "heaven" that the Israelites attribute it to Moses? And Yeshua's response was about Moses?). Yeshua told them, MOST ASSUREDLY, Moses did NOT give you the bread from heaven. Only my Father [Parent] in heaven gives the bread from heaven as seen in John 6:30-33. This simply means that YHWH does NOT LIVE in heaven.* Moses did not meet YHWH in heaven [Exodus 3]. Adam and Eve did not have conversations with YHWH in heaven. *YHWH through his hired robber, Moses, robbed, murdered, and destroyed at least 2 million Egyptians, many animals, and trees between Exodus 3-14.* In Exodus 14, YHWH personally [no angels or prophet used] took off the 1,200 chariot wheels off the 600 chariots to kill 600 horses [Egyptians men were collateral] which he hates [Psalms 147:10] because horses are fearless [Job 39:19-25 specifically v.22] and would essence not fear him [you could tell YHWH was bragging about himself being the Leviathan in Job 41. Which think about the root name of Levi, Leviticus [including ch 24:15-16 to stone people invoking anyone using the name I Am/Yahweh as Yeshua did in John 8:58], Leviathan and the only person (Moses) that got Yahweh’s alleged “real” name in Exodus 3:13-14 of “Yahweh” aka I Am, just happened to be from the Tribe of Levi? Why did Abraham not get this name (Genesis 17:1 [El Shaddai (“God” Almighty)])? Why did Jacob who allegedly wrestled with “God” [Genesis 22:24-32] as implied by the passage got no name?
*2. Indirect LIE and MURDER: 2 Kings 1 where Elijah used YHWH's fire to slaughter 102 men* [which anything with destruction alleged to be coming from "heaven" is FALSE]. When *James and John wanted to imitate Elijah by bringing down destructive fire on the Samaritans, Yeshua rebuked them for not KNOWING what Spirit they were of.* Yeshua [which has the Father {Parent} Spirit of Truth as expanded on in John 14] said that he did NOT come to DESTROY but to SAVE as told in Luke 9:51-56.
The way to tell a false God/Savior and their false prophets is in Matthew 7:15-20:
1. Good TREE = Good FRUITS = LIFE
2. Bad Tree = Bad FRUITS = DEATH
Genesis 1:31, everything was very good and thus no tree could cause death as one of the many lies told by YHWH in Genesis 2:16-17. This one lie is exposed Genesis 1:29-31, Genesis 3:1-7, 22-24 and YHWH's lies typically comes before his murder and destruction (Genesis 7, in which this flood is shown in Revelation 12 of the water out of his Dragon's mouth).
In case you have not figured it out, *YHWH is the Dragon of Revelation 12, and he, YHWH aka "God," went into great details describing his physical attributes in Job 41 (Leviathan).* Consider what Leviticus and Leviathan has in common? The root word from the Tribe Levi. Moses happens to be from the Tribe of Levi. We see [Simeon] and Levi cursed them due to their cruel and wrathful murderous ways which Jacob did not want them in a position counseling the Tribes of Israel and that they should be scattered amongst their brothers [Genesis 49:5-7]; yet Moses enlarged and put his Tribe Levi in the position of ultimate leadership to determine the fate of the Tribes [Deuteronomy 33:8-11]. Some scholars believe the priest text [concerning Aaron existence] was artificially added in. *When Yeshua speaks, he does not mention the Law of YHWH but spoke about the Laws of Moses, ask yourself, why is this?* Moses the Egyptian raised prince that decided to take revenge against his Egyptian family because he murdered one of his subjects and fled from his Egyptian family to go live a peasant life. *YHWH through Moses's Torah/Laws (5 books, especially Leviticus) groomed the Israelites in how to offer themselves and others [slaughter] as "clean" so they might be consumed by him. It sick twisted and diabolical.*
YHWH is also the Bright Light and Voice claiming to be Yeshua that Pharisee Saul Paul of Tarsus who preferred to be called "Apostle" Paul met on the wilderness road leading to Damascus [Acts 9, 22, and 26] and is in fact the First Beast of Revelation 13 [which is why the physical description is the same as the Dragon]. Paul is the Second Beast/False Prophet and the First Beast was dealt a mighty blow by Peter, James, John and the other apostles, but Emperor Constantine and his Phariseal lackeys resurrected Paul and his "gospel" of the First Beast as of Council Nicene 325 AD and Council Constantinople I 381 AD which they forced upon the inhabitants of the earth and still is forcing. I have not read their materials to know much about the Muslims, but I am fairly certain that their angel Gabriel is also YHWH [another First Beast] with their prophet Muhammad [Second Beast/False Prophet] that is also causing the inhabitants of the earth to ultimately worship Satan/YHWH/Dragon. The False messiah and false prophets are all iterations of YHWH, which isn't his true name, He HIJACKED/STOLE IT!
This was supposed to be short, but I cannot shut up about these evil asswipes that did some nasty evil shat against all of us! The blood sacrifice saves is also bullshat. I got lots. Ask, seek, knock (Matthew 7).
Paul wasn’t a more "viral" preacher than Peter and the Jerusalem church. Paul was overshadowed and forgotten until Marcion revived him, and the church under Constantine recognised him as inspired in the 4th century.
@@natwil735, Clementine Homilies (Homilies 2, 3, in particular) have a different perspective. They don’t call YHWH evil, they call him slandered by having been portrayed as cruel. Clementine Homilies testify about the corruption of the Bible in accordance to Jeremiah 8:8: "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of YHWH is with us'? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie.
@@wserthmar8908 I would not agree to your original comment on 1 Dec 2023 as stated:
"Paul wasn’t a more "viral" preacher than Peter and the Jerusalem church. Paul was overshadowed and forgotten until Marcion revived him, and the church under Constantine recognised him as inspired in the 4th century."
Paul was first and foremost a Roman citizen by the very fact that he stopped using his Hebrew given name of Saul and used his Roman given name of Paul so he could freely move about when Peter a Hebrew [Israelite/Judahite aka "Jew"] did not have such freedom. Peter could not readily whip out a Roman citizenship get out of jail free card as Paul could do. If you look at a Christian Bible that has maps of the New Testament, invariably, you will see the many places Paul has traveled far and wide pushing his Phariseal Indoctrination [all Matthew 23 but specifically v.15 (NKJV) “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.] with a little added on that Yeshua aka "Jesus" is the fulfillment lying murderous YHWH (Yahweh). Saying someone from let say North Korea citizenship having as much free range to travel as someone with an American citizenship to spread whatever they have to spread is exceptionally ingenuos and false on your part; and the only person you can fool with your falsehood from your father (John 8:44) are your fellow brothers and sisters that are ignorant and slated for consumption by YHWH the Dragon (Revelation 12)/Leviathan (Job 41) as cursed by your fellow siblings aka "prophets" that do YHYWH bidding using their spoken word power (Matthew 18:18) as YHWH does not have our power [he is a pathetic has been that uses trickery and the influence of Babylon (Spirit of Falsehood/Darkness/Death) of Revelation 17-18, his mother, who whispers in a sinister way into our ears to influence the darkness aka "deep sleep" they placed on us and spiritually broke us into two which made us naked in Genesis 2:21-25 to have us destroy ourselves. Here is a snippet of one of the children of YHWH (John 8:44) Isaiah who was glad to volunteer his filthy lips to oppress and slaughter us:
Isaiah 6:8-13 (NKJV)
8 Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying:
*“Whom shall I send,*
*And who will go for Us?”*
Then I said, “Here am I! Send me.”
9 And He said, “Go, and tell this people:
‘Keep on hearing, but do not understand;
*Keep on seeing, but do not perceive.’*
10
*“Make the heart of this people dull,*
And their ears heavy,
And shut their eyes;
Lest they see with their eyes,
And hear with their ears,
*And understand with their heart,*
*_And return and be healed.”_*
11 Then I said, “Lord, how long?”
And He answered:
*“Until the cities are laid waste and without inhabitant,*
The houses are without a man,
The land is utterly desolate,
12
The Lord has removed men far away,
And the forsaken places are many in the midst of the land.
13
*But yet a tenth will be in it,*
*And will return and be for consuming,*
As a terebinth tree or as an oak,
Whose stump remains when it is cut down.
*So the holy seed shall be its stump.”*
Marcion barely count as a comma in comparison to the healing powers of Emperor Constantine's Council's Nicene 325 A.D. under the threat of death or banishment on the "divinity" decision on Yeshua and the "Jews" celebration of Moses slaughter on his adopted Egyptian family (Passover) to the First Beast of Revelation 13. *You practice your mother Babylon's Falsehood, but you have been given warnings in Revelation 18 to get out of her if you are a misguided lost folk member.* Revelation 22:11-20 warn that there is NO LIE amongst those entering the Kingdom of Life.
Throw a few names out there, Marcion, Clementine, Jeremiah, I am not impressed as you brought absolutely nothing of validity or substance close to any truth. Let's put your misquoted filth (Jeremiah 8:8) into perspective and expand slightly on what the text actually said:
Jeremiah 8: 8-13, 17 (NKJV)
8
“How can you say, ‘We are wise,
And the law of the Lord is with us’?
Look, the false pen of the scribe certainly works falsehood.
9
The wise men are ashamed,
They are dismayed and taken.
Behold, they have rejected the word of the Lord;
So what wisdom do they have?
10
Therefore I will give their wives to others,
And their fields to those who will inherit them;
Because from the least even to the greatest
Everyone is given to covetousness;
*From the prophet even to the priest*
*Everyone deals falsely.*
11
*For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of My people slightly,*
Saying, ‘Peace, peace!’
When there is no peace.
12
Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination?
No! They were not at all ashamed,
Nor did they know how to blush.
Therefore they shall fall among those who fall;
In the time of their punishment
They shall be cast down,” says the Lord.
13
*“I will surely consume them,” says the Lord.*
“No grapes shall be on the vine,
Nor figs on the fig tree,
And the leaf shall fade;
And the things I have given them shall pass away from them.” ’ ”
17
*“For behold, I will send serpents among you,*
*Vipers which cannot be charmed,*
*And they shall bite you,” says the Lord.*
In terms of Jeremiah 8:12 above, other than the context itself above which I will briefly touch on, *here is just one of the many garbage that is considered an abomination by the pathetic loser* that goes by the name of Yahweh:
Leviticus 19:5-8 (NKJV)
5 ‘And if you offer a sacrifice of a peace offering to the Lord, you shall offer it of your own free will. 6 It shall be eaten the same day you offer it, and on the next day. And if any remains until the third day, it shall be burned in the fire. *7 And if it is eaten at all on the third day, it is an abomination.* It shall not be accepted. 8 Therefore everyone who eats it shall bear his iniquity, because he has profaned the hallowed offering of the Lord; and *that person shall be cut off from his people.*
Let me put in layman terms for dull heart folks, left over food eaten on the third day mean you are cut off from your people. These left over food eaters didn't even get the mercy of a quick stoning to death, they get thrown out to go starve to death outside the community and probably get torn apart by wild animals.
Now on with the remainder of the snippet from Jeremiah 8 copied above, YHWH wants no one to have knowledge or healing as seen in Isaiah 6 above and in Jeremiah 8:10-11 the fact that the prophets provided some healing and prophesied peace, YHWH hates this and as seen in v.13 restates that these people will be for consuming as them doing stuff such as slight healing of I am sure YHWH's many curses through his other prophets is really really bad per YHWH and thus it is an abomination worth being consumed over. In case you folks are unaware the definition of the word consume- this means to eat.
I added Jeremiah 8:17 because John the Baptist in Matthew 3:7-10 especially v.7 and Yeshua in Matthew 12:33-37 especially v.34 call the Pharisees in which "Apostle Paul" is indeed Pharisee Saul Paul of Tarsus, a Benjaminite (a ravening wolf Genesis 49:27). Both John the Baptiste and Yeshua called the Pharisee broods (children) of vipers and both mentioned trees and their fruits; clearly indicating these Pharisees are BAD FRUITS from the BAD TREE (Yahweh their parent and his unending pathetic laws of what he considers are abomination). These vipers cannot be charmed to switch over to the side of doing what is right, so obviously my pearls of good is ineffective to the likes of you (John 8:44). Enjoy biting your fellow siblings as you and your father's words have nothing in me and my family (John 14:30).
As for me and myself, I will disregard and REJECT YHWH's pathetic words as my wisdom is from the Spirit of Truth (John 14:26).
Jeremiah 8:9
The wise men are ashamed,
They are dismayed and taken.
Behold, *they have rejected the word of the Lord* ;
*So what wisdom do they have?*
John 14:26
*26 But the Helper, the [Spirit of Truth], whom the Father [Parent] will send in **-My name-** [in Steadfast Love], [the Spirit of Truth] will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.*
So many churches are "Paulianity" rather than Christianity.
No such thing. Paul doesn't contradict Jesus in any way.
@@johnmark6628lol christianity is the religion of Paul.
@@solomons5669Nope.
Jesus and Paul Don't contradict each other !
@@endtimesareuponus8930 Lol you don’t even know what Jesus said or preached
@@eprd313
Jesus never said that the people of the new covenant needed works.
Once again, I appreciate the casual conversational format. I believe this makes it accessible to a wider audience, and personally, sometimes I don't want the highly technical and deeply philosophical exposition. 🤝💫
Side note;
I've only recently heard anything about the discrepancies between the teachings of Jesus & Paul and I'm finding it is very enlightening. 🧘
If you studied the entire chapter/book what you would find is that these aren't actually contradictions at all.
This is why critics of the Bible avoid these surface "contradictions" b/c they're evidence of Bible illiteracy.
Jesus taught Israelites, Paul taught Gentiles. Huge difference in audience and approach. Very simple.
Thanks! Your content has helped me a lot.
Thanks for the supers! Happy my content has helped!
Awesome. Truly awesome. Well presented info here. This rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper when realizing this for the first time.
Man listening to you.😊 Do you have anything to say about AI
I've been on a huge tirade about Paul to my friends and co workers and pretty much anyone who will listen for the past 3 weeks now and realizing how much modern Christians follow this man but claim to follow Jesus has really given me a mind shattering disillusionment, I've since crossed a threshold and i can't go back now. Great content as always and would love to hear you dive deep into Paul sometime soon!
I want to get more knowledge so I'm able to go on tirades like you that's so cool
@@amelialalllalala3914 just keep being a truth seeker and you'll get there in no time!
amelialalllalala3914 - More knowledge is always good! I posted a long eval of Kristi’s video. There are so many misleading statements that I had to do it in two parts. I encourage you to read it. Forgive me but Kristi is either speaking without knowledge or is intentionally misleading people.
@@ianalan4367 Nah
Bart Ehrman has recently produced a series where he discusses Paul in-depth, contrasting him to Jesus. James Tabor also talks a bit about Paul
Wow! Kristi, I've never heard these ideas of yours from anyone before. Amazing how you've clearly explained your views. Love it! Thanks for sharing.
the blind Burke leads her blind followers into the ditch
@@RonKelmell Burke doesn't hold a carrot on a stick named gift of eternal life. Burke doesn't promise an afterlife existence in a robot heaven where everyone adores a dead god, without ever experienced the so-called afterlife. The lovers of lies, are the sucker played believers indeed! So mesmerized by every word from the black book spoken to their half-lighted minds. The Whole-Lie Buy-Bull containing 66 books of unsolved riddles to seduce your beliefs... AKA (Mental Masturbation)! Dead Words written on a Dead Tree by Dead People... A Necromancers Poetic Dictionary! You speak of blindness as if to claim to see something. H-mm didn't think so.... Right? Not thinking on your own really isn't seeing anything. Not thinking on your own is following instructions on what to see. This is strictly why sucker believers must keep in packs like dogs. Because they’re too dumb to survive in this cold world on their own. Unable to really be free from the hierarchy of the manmade madness of religion. Believers have locked themselves in a neat tidy little cage, and claimed to be free from the horrible, wicked world. Yet they see not one iota of beauty in this wonderful world of wicked sinners. It's those horse blinders that the preachers tied to your heads. You're on the straight and narrow pathway to the wonderful beyond. Never to be known until after your deceased. SOOO sweet! Right?! Get excited... One day you’ll get the last word to all the wicked. And you can relish it. With that big old, wicked grin on your face. Ah, you always knew you were right and the wicked were wrong! Muah, ha, ha, ha. Fool! Open your eyes. All men, women, and children are both good and evil! Even your hypocritical wicked Bible God is both good and evil. Wise up! Grow a brain for once dumbfounded monkey.
It's because they are nonsense, anyone who has studied the Bible seriously cannot come to those conclusions, in fact the highest Apostle himself outright said she is foolish.
*2 Peter 3:15-16*
15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
The condemnation is upon her, and all those who follow her.
Note: The faith without works is dead thing is James, not Paul. At least I think...
James preached in accordance to Jesus’ teachings he gave to his followers
Paul writing are first cronologic in new testament after him was mark so how this work? Everything what jesus saying it's after Paul writing, i hope you understand what I'm saying, English it's not my main language
She told everything out of context and with no context. She is a deceiver and the Bible warned of people like her
You are right, Paul's letters did finish completion after the Gospels. But Jesus physically was in the world and died before Paul wrote his letters. The apostles just took a while to finally complete the written Gospels.
@@joevi2593 Paul's letter are first so before gospels, Paul didn't know nothing about Virgin birth and nothing about all miracle what jesus did. After come Mark gospel which it's same did mention virgin birth, so that guys who was living in that time and for sure they die and didn't know jesus was birth was from virgin and nothing because chronologic gospels have at least 50y one before another, it's any chance like people developing the virgin birth and jesus it's God? Because if I give you some verses to read there it's like even the apostols didn't know mesia have to die for they sin even parents of jesus didn't know he it's divine.... They expect jesus do something else not die and rise after 3 days.
Faith without works is empty is in James, not any of Paul's epistles.
You're right! Thanks for correcting that!
Yeah, I got the t-shirt
James was the brother of Jesus - both Paul and Luke in the Book of Acts call him this - and was at odds with Paul and what he was doing. If you read Chapter 21 of the Book of Acts, James confronts Paul about the deviant message he has been preaching while out in the field, and orders Paul to do a one week purification ritual to prove his loyalty to the Jewish teachings of Jesus and to the Law. So everything was not totally harmonious within the early church., and Paul and James were at loggerheads with one another.
Objection, plz define "faith" for me.
Noice Woiyk! Paul was a False Profit for sure
I hear ya! Being an atheist, I've begun to look at Paul in a new light and with an open mind.I have discovered some of the same discrepancies in Paul's life and teachings as you have.It's amazing that Paul ended up writing two thirds of the new testament and that many Christians quote him more than Jesus.Maybe they should change their title "Christian" to "Paulian."
From some of the studies I have done my conclusion is Paul was the 1st or a main Pillar Jesuit priest controlled by the RCC used to control the masses. JMO
Yeah and part of Paul's writing are written by someone else claiming to be him.
@@Cuffsmaster Paul warned the Thessalonians not to be troubled by a letter-AS COMING FROM US.(2 Thess.2:2) It's a bit ironic that Paul warned the Thessalonians that there were fake letters claiming to be from Paul and yet,all these years latter, scholars are saying that many of Paul's letters that are in the new test.are not really Paul's letters but are fake and were not written by him but by imposters.Go figure.
@@shriggs55 I pay little attention to Paul. He is more of a nut case than anything else. He also thought the Messiah would come suing his lifetime. That didn't work to well for him .. As you say "go figure"
@@Cuffsmaster Yeah.I agree
Kristi, can you make a response video to this video giving the best argument against your original points on the seven contradictions, and then respond to those best arguments? I'm struck by the lack of context and depth of thinking that you have shown to one or both contradiction verses. I'm not trying to be rude, Kristi, but your stance on many of these contradictions does not pass the test of serious thought to what the other side would offer in response to you.
She is lying about every single point
1- Christ Physically Blinded Paul.. it wasn’t just a vision. Paul had physical Scales on his eyes blinding him.
2- Galatians 2:20 is talking about OUR SIN is completely forgiven through the crucitfition and only through JESUS did this happen… The Galatian Church had false teachers telling them Faith in Christ is not enough…
3- “Paul is teaching” “Paul is building Churches” .. Yes!
Mathew 23 8-10 he’s talking about the PHARISEES 😭 He’s telling them not to call the Jewish Leadership these names.
Jesus sent his Disciples City to City to teach and build his church.
4- Mathew 17:21-23 - Jesus is talking about Judgement day. When you stand infront of him and he will cast you away because Works WILL NOT ALONE get you into heaven.
5- ROMANS: 10:13 - Paul is saying you must believe in JESUS the Lord…
Yes you will be saved… But you can’t continue to love your sin or you will be cast into hell as you quoted in Mathew 17
You’re contradicting your own Theology without realizing it.
6- Romans 9 - Paul is taking about the Jews.. he is heartbroken they refuse to accept the messiah. He is saying “if yall keep messing around God he will let you live in your ways and his mercy will be gone”
This is throughout the entire Bible just like Jesus standing there with Abraham Genesis 19:24 .. Jesus called to the father in heaven to destroy the sinning city. Mercy was GONE
7- Mathew 5-7… Of course you’ll be shown mercy! Do you really think a ACTIVE SHOOTER killing people decides not to kill one person showing mercy then they are given Mercy by God? Cmon now 😬😂
Everything she stated was out of context and twisted to fit her storyline unfortunately
impressive presentation. i have similar ones on my own channel with more detail. thank u for sharing.
I was just thinking about this!! Ah, thank you!!! I’m deconstructing Mormonism and my attempt at Christianity and saw that Jesus really was a wanderer who taught a simpler gospel than what seems to have grown out of it. It all feels like a muddy mess of theology and myth, haha.
You think jesus gospel was more simple?
They had to confess their sins,repent,believe and be baptized.
Paul said believe.
John the Baptist, Jesus and Paul were members of a sub-sect of the Jewish faith. They thought the Earth would end in the generation in which they lived. They are wrong. Then the faith had to do a song and dance to change the theme.
It appears to be a muddy mess because you see lots of pieces but can’t seem to fit them together. It’s an intricate work of love and art. It’s brilliant. Jesus is a “wanderer” because He walked to Gentile regions, explaining to them that He is their way back to God. He did miracles to help them but to also show His Godly status. His simple message is truly simple though. Love YHWH. Love your neighbor. If you have questions, I’d love to dig out answers for you.
@@ryannoe86 If you look thought history there are 1000's of people with the gift of gab and the message people want to hear at that time and place that have been successful.
Hell we can na,e 10 cult leaders in the 20th century very easy starting with Charles Mason and Jim Jones.
People are gullible..
Jim Jones convinced people he was a faith healer too....
The problem with the bible, both the old and new Testaments, is that none of the supernatural events that are the foundation of the faith can be proven to be true. If one is willing to believe the fake supernatural events are real then rest is easy for them to believe without facts.
All the inaccurate things of the bible become easy to explain to yourself if you are willing to believe the obvious fake supernatural events are real.
The faith trains you to be gullible and to accept excuses. Christians are trained to be gullible from childhood. Religion is NOT about finding the truth but finding excuses to make the fake events seem true in their minds.
Yes, Jesus had some great simple messages for life.. Hell every faith has that. It is not spectacular for a faith to give a good basic set of rules for moral living. The problem is all the other stuff they add to that.
according to Prophet Mohammedl Paul is one of the most evil creature walked on earth .he created christianity and the poor jesus was a victim of this devil of Paul . thats why jesus in bible on the day of judgment Paul followers will go to jesus and they will call him God then jesus he will reply i dont know you go away sinners . Jesus said the key for heaven is by worshipping the Father alone ike a jew and keep to torah . Bur for paul the heaven is by beleiving in jesus and he washed you by hiis blood lol
I absolutely love your content. I referred you to several members of my family and many friends that have deconstructed. They also watch your videos now and love them as well. Keep up the amazing work!
She doesn't know what she is talking about, and this whole "deconstruction" is idiotic at best.
She will answer for her actions, and so will you, because both of you have now engaged in deception whether by ignorance or will.
*2 Peter 3:15-16*
15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
The condemnation is upon her, and all those who follow her.
@@workinpromo super duper Christian reply. Especially all the name calling and threats of eternal damnation. Here’s the thing. We don’t believe what the Bible says, so you come off like a toddler throwing a tantrum about a bedtime story they had read to them. I wish you the day you deserve.
1- Christ Physically Blinded Paul.. it wasn’t just a vision. Paul had physical Scales on his eyes blinding him.
2- Galatians 2:20 is talking about OUR SIN is completely forgiven through the crucitfition and only through JESUS did this happen… The Galatian Church had false teachers telling them Faith in Christ is not enough…
3- … “Paul is teaching” “Paul is building Churches” .. Yes!
Mathew 23 8-10 he’s talking about the PHARISEES 😭 He’s telling them not to call the Jewish Leadership these names.
Jesus sent his Disciples City to City to teach and build his church.
4- Mathew 17:21-23 - Jesus is talking about Judgement day. When you stand infront of him and he will cast you away because Works WILL NOT ALONE get you into heaven.
5- ROMANS: 10:13 - Paul is saying you must believe in JESUS the Lord…
Yes you will be saved… But you can’t continue to love your sin or you will be cast into hell as you quoted in Mathew 17
You’re contradicting your own Theology without realizing it.
6- Romans 9 - Paul is taking about the Jews.. he is heartbroken they refuse to accept the messiah. He is saying “if yall keep messing around God he will let you live in your ways and his mercy will be gone”
This is throughout the entire Bible just like Jesus standing there with Abraham Genesis 19:24 .. Jesus called to the father in heaven to destroy the sinning city. Mercy was GONE
7- Mathew 5-7… Of course you’ll be shown mercy! Do you really think a ACTIVE SHOOTER killing people decides not to kill one person showing mercy then they are given Mercy by God?
This girl lied about every single verse to trick people who don’t actually know the Bible
Every single verse she made her own context
It’s really sad
thank you very much!
People of that time listened to Paul because they knew he could always go back to his old job.
Your videos are always thoughtful. I continue to learn more at each opportunity.😊
thanks for your videos. I came out of a sort of cult, and I am still in the "what if I'm wrong" phase, but your videos really help.
You're not. But even if you are, that doesn't make Christians (or any other religious group) right. So if you're glum about not going to heaven, take comfort in the knowledge that they aren't either.
Keep praying, ask the Lord to guide younto the truth. We might be wrong, but the Lord is never wrong.
This video will not help any one . She does not understand the basics. Paul was the Apostle to the non-Jews (gentiles ). He had been a pharisee therefore would once have been married ,so was referring to widowers . The Apostles called his writings scripture .
FIND SOME MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE TEACHERS .Such as traditional Baptists . I am not one, but most Christians have the same basic teaching about 1 . The word of God that is inspiration 2. The way of salvation . 3. The person of Jesus as the only begotten son of God . Try Paul Washer .on the gospel .Avoid the Pentecostal Word of Faith movement that teaches they are gods.
@@wendymitchell8245that was my 1st thought when listening...her basic knowledge is shocking.....she would be destroyed in a debate against any layman in bible studies....Paul contradicted jesus is such an old argument...
This video is one of the most nonsensical videos I’ve ever watched.
@audiodrink, start a new thread. The one you replied to is too long.
I'm all in for a deep dive on Paul.
Thanks so much. After 58 years of “apostasy” I no longer feel alone. This guy Paul has always bothered me, and you’ve helped me understand why. Or you’ve confirmed it. Now I understand why our religion teacher (a catholic priest) said that I “sound like a Protestant”, and now I understand why it seemed like a compliment to me, even then. It wasn’t long until the last time I voluntarily attended a Roman mass.
Agreed. I was of the mind, he was an usurper of the gospel. But the churches always use his teachings to beat folks over the head and force them to conform to their (the Church) ideals.
Amen
The priest shouldn't have said so. Word can hurt.
Jesus Condemns homosexuality Luke 17:28-32
@@marinacitronova8604 oh, but it didn’t hurt, I realized he was right and I happily turned away. A few years ago, a college friend advised me to return to my “catholic heritage”. I said I firmly do not believe any of that stuff. He replied “that doesn’t matter, you were baptized”. HUH what I believe doesn’t matter? Isn’t that ridiculous.
Jesus was not saying that everyone should be married. Context. We have to consider other verses where Jesus encouraged celibacy..."some make themselves Eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven". Thats same thing that Paul was saying. Jesus and Paul expressed the value of celibacy...but they both promoted marriage for the masses.
Bingo. You have proven you have more sense than Kristi through one meager observation. Well done.
Jesus didn't encourage celibacy. His comments about Eunuchs was in response to his disciples saying it was better not to marry after he talked to them about a spiritual view of divorce. He actually made the comment about Eunuchs to dissuade his disciples from considering not getting married.
@@tobibabs7725 read the passage. The eunuch passage...the eoned who make themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of God...that was a nod for those who make themselves celibate to pursue Gods kingdom.
Like he said...most won't get it.
@@tobibabs7725 you missing Jesus point so clearly. It's right there.
Just because Jesus acknowledged that humans were practicing something does not mean he gives it a nod. It's just a recognition the practice of making oneself a eunuch exists. You can acknowledge the existence of a thing without giving it a nod.
You're breaking my heart with your facts and logic. Did you go through a period of grieving your "breakup" up Jesus? Would love to hear about that. I got that terminology from a rabi critiquing Christianity.... But obviously his conclusion is different from yours. I'm autistic so i need an intentional step by step guide for how to do that. Thanks!
There is zero facts and logic in this video.
@@johnmark6628 If Paul clearly goes against the disciples of Jesus with teachings that goes against Jesus, then it is NOT the original message, get real!
@@youareacoward8459
Paul doesn't go against the teachings of Jesus.
@@johnmark6628 You can not have read the bible that's for sure.
@@youareacoward8459
Show me where Paul went against the teachings of Jesus.
Very thoughtful considerations to be considered.
Maybe a question worth asking would be; Assuming Paul really was one of the false prophets Jesus spoke about and his teachings were contradictory, why didn't the other apostles make it clear? Or at least state in their own letters that Paul wasn't to be trusted?
@@Dylan-kx6fc He mentions Paul in 2 Peter. This is what he says.
“Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.”
2 Peter 3:15-16 NIV
It sounds like an endorsement of Paul to me.
@@Dylan-kx6fc God bless you truly.
I would love to see a deep dive into Paul! After my first reread of the Bible after I started questioning my faith, I started to wonder if he was one of the first to co-opt the story of Jesus to make his own cult.
And Paul was the reason I stopped going to church. Maybe I just had the misfortune of going to too many Pauline churches, but when 2/3rds (or more, it definitely felt like more) of the preaching was on the words Paul over the teachings of Jesus, the more cult like and the less divinely inspired it felt.
Same here, Paul was the reason I started reading my bible less … i had enjoyed the Gospels but when I got to Paul I was just feeling really frustrated and confused.
*2 Peter 3:15-16*
15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
The condemnation is upon her, and all those who follow her.
Having an issue with hard teachings is one thing, but denying God for those teachings shows pride as in "I know better than God" which is the seed of all failure.
@@workinpromo The pretty young girl making this video may indeed be a non-believer. However Paul indeed is a false dsicples and false apostle. This much this pretty little non-believer has correct.
@@KeepingWatch95 I am afraid she remains incorrect, as all the other Apostles approved of Paul including Peter who I quoted. And the Catholic Church has infallibly approved of the Apostle's writings.
Anyone who stands against Paul, stands against the Church Universal, and thus stands against God Almighty our Lord Jesus Christ.
She will receive according to her works, although I pray God shows her mercy.
@@workinpromo Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
Revelation 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
Revelation 18:6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
Revelation 18:7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
Revelation 18:8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.
Yes, I want a Paul video!!!
Yes, please do a deep dive re Paul. I will look forward to this. Ty☮️♥️🕊️
The fact that Paul's church evolved into the Catholic church should be evidence enough that Paul had his head up his butt😂
But I thought the Roman Catholics based it on Peter ("Upon this rock [Cephas, or "Peter"] I will build my church). Thereby claiming Peter as the first Pope. I sat through a 7 night course on the New Testament back in the 1980s by Ray VanderLaan (who has traveled to The Holy Land) and did a ton of research. I seem to recall his opinion was it was NOT Peter Jesus was referring to. I wish I had kept all the documentation we were given at the course.
@johntiggleman4686 Yes, your probably right. It's been awhile since I read about it. If we're honest,though,the Catholic Church worships money and power, and it is a moot point who they pretend to think was right.
There is no biblical or historical evidence for the claims of the roman Catholic Church that Peter was the first pope. And there’s no evidence that there even was a pope in the first century
Roman Catholics don’t claim what you just said. They cite Peter as the first pope.
Mathew 28:19 Jesus clearly tells His followers to spread The Gospel. Amen
Yess this what I.& Wee need truth and debunking fam keep it up
Kristy, I love your channel! You pretty much just clarify all the thoughts that have been bouncing around in my head for 20 years. Not that I haven't clarified many of them myself but it definitely helps to bounce them off others who are doing the same thing.
A deeper dive into Paul? Bring it on! Loved your ideas in this one. 😊
More to come! Thanks for watching
If you actually studied the Bible the you would realize that she has no clue what she is even talking about and takes everything out of context. Why don't you ask her where she studied the Bible and what degree she holds?
@@jamiehudson3661 But her arguments make sense don't they.
@@drumsanddrumming8289 No, they don't.
@@jamiehudson3661 So, what university degree would you suggest one take to correct her observations?
As a teenager in the 80s I had similar questions when I sat in “church” and heard readings from the Bible. I am now a nonbeliever and my only regret is that I didn’t come to this rational realization sooner. Like many, it was my mother who forced me to attend “church” with her. My father was a lifelong agnostic who put up with my mother’s hyper-religiosity out of his love for her. He was a “saint”!😊 Thank you for your insights!
actually the enemies of isaya son of maryam are Roman and hypocrites jews and absolutely Paul the false apostle for fact the Roman empire strongly influenced the trinity Creed, jzeus pagan god in greek became jesus in English also they greet hell 🔥 become hello 🔥 silence trap for bad luck and curses into hell fire greet hell o everyday... without all of us realize so wake up..seek the truth with last revelation in original form from almighty creator the one and only...
This is interesting. I always wandered how individuals like yourself deal with the concept of good and evil... 🤔?
Do you still believe in objective truth?
@@janepatton8100I certainly don’t.
Kind of crazy... I tell people all the time mainly what Jesus taught is how to treat each other with love respect and compassion.. and if we gain nothing else out of it we know the world would be a better place if everybody did it LOL
@@brianhanssens7996
Understood. So I have two questions...
1. Is it true that chattel slavery in the US was bad/evil?
2. Is it true that homophobia is bad/evil?
I've noticed that most, if not all, of the "contradictions" in the Bible are like this:
"People are good. People are bad."
At first glance, a direct contradiction - but upon further examination, two separate facts that, taken together and in context, reveal the full and absolute truth.
She tells stories in bad faith because she is speaking to an audience that doesn't read the Bible. Like how she said Jesus told us to hate our family in order to love Him. That's not what Jesus preached. And if she disagrees I want her to give me the chapter and verse.
@@masonridgewell8063 "If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple." Luke 14:26 🤘😇
@@serversurfer6169 And this done in bad faith. This is why people are mislead. I looked back at the whole chapter and you blindly quoted something with no context. The context is about loving Jesus and the creator more than yourself and family. Jesus was preaching about differences in the families. He said families are going to be divided because of faith. Sons and fathers are not going to speak, mothers and daughters also not. There will come division, people who believe and put their faith jn the creator God, and those who aren't. Jesus was giving an example which he didmany times with methaphors. This is what I mean when things are being said in bad faith. I've read the entire chapter, in fact the book of Lucas, and the other books in the new testament with Gospels from Jesus you completely put it out of context. Its like a kid who did not respect his parents curfew and says "oh no I am 1 hours late my parents are going to kill me". Of course the kid knows he is not actually going to be killed by his parents. And the people around the kid won't report it to the police because they understand the context. This is the same thing with this chapter and most text in the bible.
@@masonridgewell8063 Luke says Jesus was traveling with his followers and said that to them out of nowhere, apropos of nothing. Then he did a few verses on the importance of planning and negotiation, and concluded by saying that if your salt goes bad, you’ll need to discard it. This “context” appears to come from you and your church, not Luke and the Bible. 🤨
If you’re going to respond in bad faith, you probably shouldn’t start your post by confessing it. 😜
> The kid doesn’t actually expect to be killed by their parents. <
Yet that’s precisely what the Bible prescribes for disobedient children. After all, children are fungible goods in the eyes of the Lord. (Job 42:13) 🤷♂️
@@serversurfer6169 First of all, I read the original scripture in the original language. I am personally very critical about a lot of translations. But if you want to go there. Look up different translations and you will see that the word hate is not mentioned but that Jesus says love me more than your father, mother and yourself.
Secondly, I read multiple translation and as mention in the original language because that's the most reliable Bible. This is one subject I have among other Christians which is why I personally do not find newer versions legit because of small details like this being mistranslated or out of context. It's funny to say because I am actually challenging other Christians about it as well. Especially those who don't read the whole thing (something you also do). But OK, lets stick with the newer ones because I know that's where you are quoting from.
You keep talking about churches. I read these long before I joined any church.
I have an honest question, did you read the Bible in it's entire? Or lets just ask, did you read the whole chapter let alone the book of Luke? Because again this was a metaphor used by Jesus. He also used the metaphor of us being seeds and trees that either grow healthy or rotten. Of course we are not actual trees but it was a visualization which Jesus used many of those.
No context is everything. You did not reply to my question. Do you think when a child says metaphorically or adult ''shit he's going to kill me'' in the context given that they actually are going to be killed? Do you think when Jesus said I didn't came here to bring peace but with a sword to divide that he came with an actual sword to divide? You just love pick and just a few sentences and think you understand a chapter and message behind it. You purposely dodged the curfew question which is what I mean with trying to argue with bad faith. The Bible is complex and you have to read it well and with context. Just like the Quran I am not a Muslim, but after reading at least I understood the context of the things that were being said despite it not being my religion.
I heard in the spiritual realm the other day that semen retention is not of God 😂. I was surprised but the part about Paul not getting any is even more telling!
This is one of the most interesting things I've watched recently, and I watch a lot of this sort of stuff (Paulogia, Plink, Aron, SkepTick, Logicked etc).
Your insight and delivery are spot on!
Hi, I just wanted to thank you for these videos. I’m in the beginning of my deconstruction and I really really look forward to your uploads. You have opened my eyes in so many ways and it’s really comforting to know I’m not a bad person for questioning what I was taught. Thank you❤
Welcome to your deconstruction journey! Be kind and patient with yourself
@@jezebelvibes You never heard of rightly dividing the word of truth, have you?
You have never heard of dispensations, have you?
There are no contradictions between Jesus and Paul when you rightly divide the word of truth and realize that there are dispensations in the bible.
You know if you were ever a true born again Christian (which you weren't) the Holy Spirit would've guided you to rightly divide the word of truth and then you would see that there are no contradictions between Jesus and Paul.
Jesus had his earthly ministry that was to Jews only and Paul had his ministry that was to Gentiles.
Paul received his teaching from the resurrected Jesus in heaven and that why the bible tells us to follow the apostle Paul as Christians.
@@danielblair4413divide the words? Ok, then what? Carry the remainder? 🤣
@@danielblair4413 All of which, would be more comforting, if there was never major schisms, infighting, wars - antisemitism, pro-slavery arguments, or other, upheavals.
Or a blood libel, on Jews - that ran, just a bit, too long.
Whilst if I see one more, case of 'we all rebelled in Adam', from assorted, would be evangelists, online - well, I might become, a little... tired.
All in all though, it seems like rightly dividing, is an often very... sketchy affair.
Maybe, a bit like John 14:14?
@@danielblair4413you begin by saying " if you were a true born again" and in the same sentence say "which you were not"
Christian love indeed 😊
If you can't see what's wrong with that you still a long way to realize how deep you are in your religious beliefs.
Yep...Be on the look out for You!
Thank you for your views and discussion, very interesting. I have a question to ask: where would Christianity of today be without Paul’s vision, resilience and determination?
😂 lovely question. Christians would be free of spiritual bondage, women would not have spent 1900 years as inferior, the confusion of The Gospel would not have succeeded, and people would have known and focused SOLELY on Jesus and not a mere man named Paul. You people spend more time defending a dead con man than The Actual Savior.
Also, no one needs Paul's or anyone else's opinions to be saved and to know The Savior.
Paul told people not to get married, not because he was against marriage but because he was expecting the end times any day. He thought his followers should focus on that and not be distracted by earthly things.
1 Cor. 9:5 Do we not have a right to take along a sister as a wife, even as the rest of the apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?
sounds kinda gnostic
If you want to start understanding Paul, one good option is the books by PHd. James Tabor. They are a must-read!
He has several videos on youtube. I've watched many of them.
@johntiggleman4686 Yes, that too. He has a website you can access with many resources, great scholarship!
17:17 It's worth noting that based on what can be pieced together of pre-Pauline texts, Mary Magdalene was the only disciple who Jesus would allow to speak on his behalf.
There is a distinction to be adressed here. Calling upon the NAME of the Lord and saying Lord, Lord, are two different things. Lord is a title, not a name per say. So calling on the actual name of the Lord is not the same as saying Lord, Lord... See what I mean? I don't see why so many people who tout this, don't see the distinction...
The thing about Paul's letters, he's answering questions, so we're really just listening into one side of a converstation. We don't have the original letters that were written to Paul.
The issue is, people don't really read Paul's letters as letters to specific people of a specific place and time. And so therefore there will be passages, even in majority, that will not apply to those outside of that group. Not to mention the multitude of times Paul specifically states he is writing his opinion.
@@cjkikuji9274 Agreed. They're probably a good thing to read, but not meant for us. Also, 2 Peter 3:16 warns people of Paul's letters
James just shoulda punched Paul out when he had the chance.
Excellent
This girl is quite right.Reading Paul's letters one become aware of rambling writing-a disturbed mind!