ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2020
- According to some critics, Paul hijacked Christianity. He preached an entirely different Gospel than Jesus. We are asked why Paul’s teachings and tone are so different than what we read from Jesus in the four Gospels. Plus, there are times that Paul and Jesus are seemingly at odds with each other. Critics will say that modern Christians don’t believe in Christianity, but Paulinism.
This video examines that claim and finds that Paul and Jesus were on the same page. The wedge that critics try and drive between Jesus and Paul is vastly overstated.
Blog post:
isjesusalive.com/is-pauls-gos...
Support me on Patreon: / isjesusalive
Paul Rhodes Eddy and Greg Boyd, The Jesus Legend: A Case for the Historical Reliability of the Synoptic Jesus Tradition amzn.to/3b04l0b
See also Did St Paul Get Jesus Right?: The Gospel According to Paul, David Wenham amzn.to/31qnjKg
#christianity #apologetics #apostlepaul
Hello there.. I am from India.. u do not know to what degree the polemics here thrash the gospel merely based on this false claim that Paul preached a differnet version than Jesus.. thank u for such a wonderful video .. good job
Thank you! I'm grateful you found it helpful!
I'm from Tamil Nadu too 🔥 God bless
And Muslims too! Praise Jesus the Christ and our saviour
Paul is a liar
The gospel is from Christ. Paul is a misogynist, not Christ.
As someone who seeks knowledge I'm glad I found your channel as some of the other Christian channels weren't cutting it.
@Two Wolves I read it, don't worry
@Two Wolves
A stupid reply to cover a lack of knowledge maybe YOU should Read the bible for yourself.
@Two Wolves
I agree with what you stated.
The Bible is false and should have a money back guarantee.
@@idkwhy77start by reading the gospel of John. Then Luke, Mark and Matthew. Then Romans, Kor 1 and 2.
The conflict between Paul and Jesus is not simply 'did they teach different things?' It's 'do they teach the same way of salvation?' For example, Paul teaches a salvation that's obtained by faith in Christ and Him crucified. Period. Jesus, however, depending on the gospel and conversation presents many ways, including works. That's the problem people are referencing. The problem is further complicated by the fact that Paul's writings are earlier than those gospels where we finally learn what Jesus is actually quoted as saying. When you put their claims side-by-side they are not univocal.
Also, the list between 0:40-2:00 is odd. The very first one, for example, just shows that Paul and Jesus both used the phrase Abba Father at some point in their life. Which... yeah of course they did. No one is saying they didn't lol. That doesn't mean they taught the same gospel. The rest of the examples are similar. If anyone has actually read this far, you should check them out for yourself.
This is where you are wrong. You suppose Paul taught that a person who does evil but believes in Jesus Christ is said while Jesus teaches that a person who does God works but does not believe in him will be saved
Paul taught that one can only be saved by believing in Jesus Christ but whoever is saved or believes in Jesus cannot do evil. So the fact of believing is a constructive reality and one cannot be a true believer if his life do not in fact yield the fruits of believe.
Now you said depending on the Gospel so let me remove John where Jesus expressly said the works of God is to believe in him
In Luke and Mathew, Jesus said, unless the drink of his blood and share in his flesh, no one can have life remember? Further in Luke, Jesus gave a parable of the Pharisee and the Publican to show that salvation is for those who believe in God to justify them rather than their works, further the incident of the rich young ruler who had kept the commandments but Jesus told him to go sell everything and to follow him. And the thief that was crucified with Jesus on the cross
Clearly Jesus knows that works will not be enough to enter the kingdom of God and one can enter the kingdom of God if he repents without any work,
@@innocentodinkemere4597 I'm glad someone saw this comment on a 2yr old video lol. You bring up some good objections. But, they assume the Bible is univocal. For example, you're right that Jesus sometimes says that salvation is by faith. But in other places like the 'parable of the sheep and goats' or the 'rich young ruler,' he says its by works. And he does so without mentioning faith in his death and resurrection at all. He is not consistent.
It sounds like your way of synthesizing these ideas is the same way laid out in James; that works are simply the sign that you've been saved. So the works themselves just show the spiritual transformation. But that's demonstrably not how real life works. Unsaved people are perfectly capable of the kind of works Jesus lays out in the parable of sheep and goats. We all have someone in our lives that lives like a saint, yet they do not believe.
If you don't try to add to Jesus words by saying what James says, then it makes sense to think of them as saved. But you just can't do it with Paul. He would, at least according to the writings of his that survived, not think that's enough.
addendum: thinking further about it, it's probably worth giving Paul a little more nuance. In 1 Timothy 2, for example, Paul writes that women will be saved through childbearing, and still only if they continue in faith, holiness etc. This is the only passage where Paul explicitly synthesises works and faith. I do not accept 1 Timothy as a legitimate letter of Paul. But in all fairness, it's there.
Also in 1 Corinthians 7 Paul says that unbelievers are made holy by simply having a believing spouse. This does get into the weeds of salvation v sanctification. And he does walk it back a little and end that passage with a lot of ambiguity, so it's not much to go on. But it is again, an example of Paul not being the strict Sola Fides character I paint him out to be.
@@dawudallen Thanks for the years jab. Noticed you also just watched the video.
I was not thinking of James in my earlier response to you. I was actually paraphrasing Romans 6
Are we to continue in sin for grace to abound? 2 By no means! We are those who have died to sin; how can we live in it any longer?12 Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires. 13 Do not offer any part of yourself to sin as an instrument of wickedness, but rather offer yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life; and offer every part of yourself to him as an instrument of righteousness. 14 For sin shall no longer be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace.
15 What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law but under grace? By no means! 16 Don’t you know that when you offer yourselves to someone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one you obey-whether you are slaves to sin, which leads to death, or to obedience, which leads to righteousness?
Now back to the references you gave,
1. The story of the rich young ruler is not a parable and the main object actually shows that salvation will not come by keeping the laws but by following Jesus. Mark 10: 20 And he said to Him, “Teacher, I have kept all these things from my youth.” 21 Looking at him, Jesus showed love to him and said to him, “One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” 22 But he [a]was deeply dismayed by [b]these words, and he went away grieving; for he was one who owned much property.
Note keeping the laws were not enough to save him but following Jesus was
The next instance is a parable. Which means it is not a direction. But these works are works of righteousness and I do not suppose God will punish anyone who has done works of righteousness. The real issue is, can any man actually do the works of righteousness? Jesus parable of the pharisee and publican will suggest no. Can you lead a sinless life, without doing any evil?
@@innocentodinkemere4597 Oh not a jab. I just never expected anyone to see it. The life of a TH-cam video is like a month tops. I'm just happy to be noticed haha.
If in 1Corinthians, Paul says "not I but the Lord" in reference to the teachings of Jesus, then would it be safe to say that those teachings have been faithfully rendered in the gospels, and even circulated by mouth as early as the formation of the church?
Yes Paul got his revelations from LORD JESUS CHRIST in heaven, Jesus revealed things to Paul that he didn’t reveal to the 12 in his earthly ministry to Israel. Paul states he received information from Jesus that was keep hid in secret in GOD since the foundation of the world proof Paul received a divine revelation from LORD JESUS CHRIST himself
@@andrewdejesus5805 Paul saying that he received divine revelation is in no way proof that he did! Even Yahushua said his own testimony was not enough. Paul saying he was an apostle also is not proof that he was an Apostle of the Lamb, of which there are only 12 (Rev 21:14). Mattias replaced Judas, becoming the 12th. Paul appointed himself. The Church at Ephesus tested him and found him to be a liar. Rev 2:2. All of Asia turned against Paul, but not against Yahushua.
@@michelemoneywell8765the only one lying here is you.
@@andrewdejesus5805makes perfect sense that "LORD JESUS CHRIST" would come and then send Paul a few years later to directly contradict him. How .. HOW are you creatures THIS stupid?
@@michelemoneywell8765 define apostle
Wow. I was really hoping to have someone finally addressed the differences but it’s another video talking about the similarities. Bummer.
Jesus' words only channel or Daniel Bjorndahl's channel will address this. Blessings
Differences, because you have been duped by the pulpit masters.
@@plainwhitepaper3898 pulpit masters, I like that.
Paul has proven himself as Godly man so unless it contradicts- its more truth
@Spriktor does this sound like a godly man? Paul's Attributes :
1) A liar (Romans 3:7)
2) A thief (2 Corinthians 11:8)
3) Boaster (2 Corinthians 11:5,16)
4) Unforgiving (Acts 15: 38-39)
5) Chameleon (1Corinthians 9:22)
6) Hypocrite (Acts 16:3, Gal 5:2)
7) Posessed(2CORINTHIANS 12:7)
8) Vengeful (1 Corinthians 5:5)
9) Confused / Bipolar (2 Cor 7:8)
10) Misogynistic (1 Timothy 2:11)
11) Chief of Sinners (1 Tim 1:15)
12) Deceitful(2 Corinthians 12:16)
13) Foolish (2Cor 12:11,2Cor11:1)
14) Practices evil (Romans 7:19)
15) Better than Christ (Col 1:24)
16) Bully (Philemon 1:19)
17) Boring (Acts 20:9)
18) Procrastinator (Gal 2:1)
19) Curses Others (1 Cor 16:22)
20) Punisher (2 Cor 10:6)
21) Hate the less fortunate (2 Thes 3:10)
22) People pleaser (1 Cor 10:33)
23) Blasphemer (1 Timothy 1:13)
I can go on and on but won't.
OF COURSE Paul preached a different message than Jesus did when he walked the Earth. Jesus was speaking to Israel, a nation under law and in covenant with God. How can you miss this??
Aren't gentile believers supposed to be grafted into Israel?
@@BWOOHAHAHAAA only as far as fellow heirs ( sonship) and the ''promise'' of eternal life but in no way shape or form are we gentiles Israel!!!
Matthew10:5-6
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Romans15:8
Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
James1:1
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
which of the 12 tribes are you from ?
Ephesians 2:11-14
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
According to you things that Jesus and Paul agree upon, what is your source of compiling that list
Does everyone ignore the mysteries given to Paul for the Gentiles specifically for this Dispensation? Paul did have a different Gospel than Jesus' Gospel of the Kingdom being at hand. Paul didn't preach that because for this Dispensation, the Kingdom is not at hand: Israel rejected their Messiah.
Under the Kingdom Gospel and according to all the promises and prophecies, Gentiles would have access to God through Israel (salvation is of the Jews).
Today (as Paul says throughout his writings, "BUT NOW..." ) salvation is not of the Jews, it came to the Gentiles because Israel fell. Romans 11:11
But Israel is not fallen for ever or for good. They are only fallen and blinded until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. Romans 11:25. We are in the Dispensation of the Body of Christ which is a completely different Church than the called out believers of Israel. That is a Gospel for outside of this current Dispensation, and is not a valid Gospel today. Soon, though, there will be a close of this Dispensation and a beginning again of the Jewish program. As we see in Revelation with the 144,000 Jews sent to preach their Gospel. They must endure till the end of the Tribulation. The Tribulation that was to follow is the reason for Mark 16:17-18, for tongues and all that stuff they were to endure to try them as gold in a fire. It all didn't happen because of the mystery Dispensation. It's all right there in Scripture.
You are so fooled by Paul!!! He is a false apostle. Yahushua was and is sole teacher. There is no disposition bs. Go back to what Yahushua taught and what the Old Testament teach. Disregard all of LIAR Paul's writings.
@@michelemoneywell8765 Then how do you explain the last 2000 years and still the promised kingdom hasn't come to earth?
And what about the Cross? Does it mean anything to you? In your religion, do you even have a Gospel and does that Gospel save you?
@@michelemoneywell8765the only one lying in this comment section over and over again is you.
@@michelemoneywell8765 tell me why you believe paul is a liar
Wow, such a rich mythology. Which video game series is this?
When Paul talks about the ministry of Jesus, it's completely in line with the gospels. The problem is when he's speaking personally, which at times he clearly mentions, others less so, but either way those things are not what most churches base their theology upon. There are some exceptions like baptism of the dead, which should be a good indicator that the problem is not Paul's writings, but the teachings of those churches.
Most churches would have the same style of fellowship and ministry with or without the epistles of Paul. The ones that don't should make a person consider whether or not the church is reading Paul's words through the lens of the gospels or the other way around. It's not unlike churches that base core aspects of their ministry on the other debated parts of the New Testament like Revelation. If fellowship demands a specific interpretation of Revelation, then that's a stumbling block to evangelism.
@@TexasBlues-ip6sv please tell me what's the Will of Jesus's father? because Jesus said take no else as your instructor but Jesus himself alone "only him!"
“Paul spent 15 days with Peter.” Paul never met Jesus or talked to Jesus. Everything Paul claims to know came through those 15 days and “revelations” he received from who he claims to be Jesus. Not unlike Joseph Smith. Now let’s do a video on the things that Paul said that are contrary to what Jesus and the real Apostles preached. You might be surprised.
Added to a favorite featured playlist. Brilliant video!
Good to see you here to
Perfect! I have friends that are dispensation believer and said that only Paul letters are for us. I thank my Lord that he used Paul to preach Jesus gospel. Thanks for the video
A strict, dogmatic adherence to the letters and teaching of Paul and his followers is nothing new in the history of Christianity, Matthew. The second century church father Marcion was such a devoted follower of Paul and his vision of the New Covenant of Jesus Christ that his version of the Christian canon of Scripture omitted the Old Testament entirely, and only included that which scholars now recognize as the genuine letters of Paul, and a single gospel, the Gospel of Luke, who was probably Paul's closest follower. Even though Marcion was the first to put together an official canon of Christian Scripture, others within the early church felt that his Pauline reductionism was way too extreme, and that the Old Testament needed to be included in the official canon of Christian Scripture, as well as the other three canonical gospels, and all the other books that finally made it into the New Testament.
Paul contradicts himself so many times and people refuse to admit that he lied even when paul says he lied in Romans 3:6-7 it is crazy.
It's actually the incorrect interpretations of the Epistles of Paul by Martin Luther (i.e. sola scriptura, sola fide) that seem to conflict with the synoptic Gospels and teachings of Jesus. The Catholic church with it's apostolic succession back to the Apostles has the correct synthesis of Jesus and Paul in it's theology. Remember that Jesus did not come and write a book, he came to found a church. "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Matthew 16:19
Context, Context, Context.
Jesus had just asked who the disciples thought he was, and Peter shouted "You are the Christ, the son of the living God". And it's this revelation, that is the boulder Jesus builds his church upon.
We know this, because he does not use the same word (in the greek) as Peter's name for the rock, but a different one.
Peter's name is much like a pebble, where the rock that Jesus builds his church upon is a boulder.
@Shawn817 That’s wishful Protestant interpretation. Read the Acts of the Apostles. Peter was clearly the leader of the early church.
@@Wildslayer50 You are interjecting your own theological wishes into Matthew 16:19. Read the Acts of the Apostles in the new testament bible. Peter was clearly the leader of the Christian church.
@@psallen5099 No, James was the leader of the early church. Later, Peter was appointed to preach to the Gentiles. Paul was a false self-appointed apostle who hijacked The Way.
@@michelemoneywell8765 Acts is not consistent with the Gospels. For within the Gospels, just after Jesus' resurrection he sent the remaining eleven disicple to the Gentiles and Jesus told the he would be with them even unto the end of the world.
_After Jesus' resurrection he sent his eleven disciples to the Gentiles “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you”_
Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.
Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted.
Matthew 28:18 And *Jesus came and spake unto them,* saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you:* and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
_Matthew 28:19 uses the Greek word (ἔθνος) “nations” and is Strong's concordance # G1484_
G1484 ἔθνος ethnos eth'-nos
Probably from G1486; a race (as of the same habit), that is, a tribe; specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): - Gentile, heathen, nation, people.
_ἔθνος is a Greek word which meaning is Gentiles, heathen, nation, people._
_Just after his resurrection Jesus instructed and sent his eleven disciples to go to all (ἔθνος G1484) Gentile, heathen, nation, people._
_And Jesus seems to say he would be with them [as they did so] even unto the end of the world..._
Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: *and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.*
_We can read nearly the same thing in the gospel of Mark._
Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.
Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.*
Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
Mark 16:17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
Mark 16:18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
Mark 16:19 So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.
Mark 16:20 And they went forth, and preached every where, *the Lord working with them,* and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.
_Note:_ Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: *and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.*
_And compare to:_
Mark 16:20 And they went forth, and preached every where, *the Lord working with them,* and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.
If Paul and Jesus were not on the same page, we can say he created a new faith, not just hijacked. I appreciate those critics. They help me to refocus on Jesus's teaching. We cannot deny there are many difference. In my church, we spent more time to study Pauline epistles than gospels. We often remember Paul's teaching and overlook Jesus's teaching. We don't realize there are some differences.
*I first notice the difference when I was listening to Gordon Fee's message about the Kingdom of God. Jesus's central message is "the Kingdom of God". Paul's central message is different.
Then, I notice his behavior toward Peter, his brother in the Lord. When Paul rebuked Peter (Galatians 2:11-14), I don't consider it was an act of love, but an act of self righteous. When we rebuke others, we consider we are right, they are wrong. But if we are in their situation, we might do the same thing. We don't even rebuke our children in public. It is to humiliate them.
John 15:12 "My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you."
John 13:35 "By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."
Average Guy
Most accomplished liars know they cannot bluff often, for their bluffs must show profit. So we see it go, with Paul the false prophet.
Yeah, and if parents rebuke their children in public then it means its an even worse kind of shaming. Parents discipline their children at home but when its public then they mean business serious shame just like God did with israel amongst the nations.
@@valeriekeefe8898 I would not label Paul as liar, false prophet. Let God be the judge. Paul was one the major leader and influencer of the early church. I just put Paul in the proper place, read his epistles with discernment.
Jesus and the 12 preached the kingdom message to Israel only , not gentiles, not the body of Christ !! the kingdom was offered to Israel until the stoning of Stephen in the end of acts 7 then Israel was blinded and in acts 9 God converted Saul of tarsus to his chosen vassal amongst the gentiles !! (Acts 9:15) remember acts is a transitional book and it was written by Luke so if you deny what's said of Paul in acts your denying Luke not just Paul!!! it was Israel only until Paul was converted then he received several mystery's that God kept secret until he revealed them 2 Paul!! (Ephesians 3:1-6 , 9) ( Romans 16:25 ) these are Christ messages not Paul's, in order to follow Christ we must follow his newest revelations for the body of Christ we must look to Paul and his epistles not Jesus earthly ministry to Israel!!
Matthew10:5-6
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Romans15:8
Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
James1:1
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
which of the 12 tribes are you from ?
Ephesians 2:11-12
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
You can make the same claim for Peter who tried to rebuke Jesus then. Everybody aside from Jesus is flawed in the bible, the human nature
Wow I never knew there were photographs of both Jesus and Paul . This is amazing !
Cute comment!
Yes their teaching are different take just one, where Paul definatley taught against the teachings of Jesus, what did Jesus say i come not to abolish the law, the law stated not to eat meat sacrificed to idols or blood or strangled, Paul taught eat what you want up to you, that was against the Mosaic Law that Jesus Followed the Apostles even told Paul to show them you don't actually believe this go purify yourself, if Paul had taught nothing wrong why did he need to purify himself.
Jesus came to create a bridge to the Father and to give us an option to stay away from sin through his death.
God's word was distributed to different prophets, people etc. throuout history
Since Yehshua came to be, why didn't he just correct and spoke things directly but instead spoke in parables?
It wasn't his mission to abolish the Jewish laws, look at what is happening in the World. The Jews are fulling thousands of years prophecy.
Paul's teachings is in-line with God but he was just used to spread it like the others.
Spiritually speaking, is there any spiritual merit in most of laws in the Torah? Sacrificing animals to atone sins but only to do it again? Does that spiritually make sense????
Or the not eating pork because it is unclean but then a person says nasty things from his mouth?
Mathhew 15:11 KJV
11 Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
@@KRFrostFire1 You can try to get around it as much as you want, but the fact is Paul taught a different teaching to Jesus, animal sacrifice isn't needed anymore as Jesus was the be all end all sacrifce, but knowhere did JESUS not Paul teach that you can now violate the entire mosaic law, it's also ironic that Paul himself writes Jesus is the model follow his footsteps closely, so Paul says follow Jesus, did Jesus teach eat whatever meat you want, eat pork, dont fast, NO he didn't but Paul did teach against those things so Paul was teaching a different gospel to Jesus, another thing that Paul took upon himself to teach differently was Jesus Preached repentance, water baptism, keeping the Law, forgiving others, and faith in who He was as necessary for salvation, Paul does not teach this he Preached faith alone as necessary for salvation, Jesus did not teach faith alone he said go and make disciples baptize them, teach them, and have them repent, and to forgive others as god has forgiven them, Paul says none of that is needed just have faith, so Paul on many occasions preaches against what the Messiah himself taught.
@@ryan62011 There are many instances in the Bible that people were saved and healed just with faith that Jesus is God and believed.
Read Luke 5 for the rest of the context but specifically
Luke 5:47-50 KJV
47 Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little.
48 And he said unto her, Thy sins are forgiven.
49 And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that forgiveth sins also?
50 And he said to the woman, Thy faith hath saved thee; go in peace.
Luke 8:43-48
43 And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years,[a] but no one could heal her. 44 She came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak, and immediately her bleeding stopped.
45 “Who touched me?” Jesus asked.
When they all denied it, Peter said, “Master, the people are crowding and pressing against you.”
46 But Jesus said, “Someone touched me; I know that power has gone out from me.”
47 Then the woman, seeing that she could not go unnoticed, came trembling and fell at his feet. In the presence of all the people, she told why she had touched him and how she had been instantly healed. 48 Then he said to her, “Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace.”
Paul also iterated this
Romans 6:15-18 KJV
15 What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law but under grace? By no means!
16 Don’t you know that when you offer yourselves to someone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one you obey-whether you are slaves to sin, which leads to death, or to obedience, which leads to righteousness?
17 But thanks be to God that, though you used to be slaves to sin, you have come to obey from your heart the pattern of teaching that has now claimed your allegiance.
18 You have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness.
You have to remember that Paul was very knowledgeable about the Torah, he even went through the opposite after learning Jesus is God.
Peter, James, John etc has acknowledged Paul especially this.
Peter 3:15-16
Some of your references are hard to find with the timing of the video but I appreciate it
He never answered the question. Answering the question means looking at the actual texts that (supposedly) contradict each other, and showing that they actually align. Mostly what he said was that Paul met with the disciples, and they (supposedly) didn't have any differences. If I want to know what Paul taught, I read Paul's letters. If I want to know what Jesus taught, I read the gospels. They simply often don't align.
No contradiction between Jesus and Paul.
Jesus saved the other crucified criminal who believes in Him and promised to take him to paradise despite not having the chance to pay or repent for his own sins.
Jesus saved him by grace and not over the good deeds or bad deeds he had committed.
That’s what exactly Paul teaches. We are saved by grace.
When Jesus Himself taught us to follow the Moses law, that is when we He was still alive and before He had been crucified for our trespasses.
Paul was speaking after Christ.
Thanks for pointing out how steeped in Jesus’ teaching Paul’s letters were.
Jesus said He was going to give His life as a ransom and that He had much more to tell His followers but the Holy Spirit would show them. Paul said God gave him a “thorn in the flesh” in order to keep him humble because of the revelations he’d been given.
That being said, Paul was great at fleshing out the theological implications of Jesus’ sacrifice, but God had already revealed the crux of theology to the Jerusalem believers before Paul’s ministry got started. He had revealed the abolition of the Law and saving of the gentiles to Peter and the Jerusalem believers’ reaction to Paul was to affirm as clear that we are saved by grace, not works, as you said.
That's Pauline, after the fact, revisionist history and doctrine you are expressing in your comment, Justin! If you should have any doubt about this, just read the part in James' Epistle that faith without works is dead. James, AKA James the Just, who both Luke and Paul call the brother of the Lord (Jesus) was the patriarch of the Jerusalem Church of Jesus' original followers after the crucifixion of Jesus. He penned those words, and the words that support his contention that faith without works is dead, specifically to refute, or at least to counter / counterbalance Paul's insistence on salvation by faith alone. This shows us that original, primitive Christianity was far from being monolithic when it came to matters of teaching and doctrine. There was the Jerusalem Church camp of Jesus' original Jewish followers, and then there was Paul's Gentile followers, who wanted to take the Jesus movement in a more Gentile oriented direction. Also, Paul was against the Law of Moses - just read his Epistle to the Romans, whereas Jesus and his original followers were all Torah observant Jews. In chapter 21 of the Book of Acts, James confronts Paul with rumors he has heard that Paul has been telling Jewish Christians of the diaspora to forsake circumcision, and other customs of the Law, and orders Paul to undergo a seven day ritual of penance and purification to prove his loyalty to the Torah and the Jerusalem Church leadership. It's all there in your New Testament, Justin - just look and see for yourself!
@@naiman4535 James didn’t order Paul to do the ritual. The context of “faith without works is dead” is that real faith motivates action. It’s not merely an intellectual enterprise. James specifically gives examples of unrighteous people, like Rahab, doing some faith-filled action, not doing some righteous, law-fulfilling action (in fact, Rahab lied). Paul specifically says James approves his telling of the Gospel.
@@justinmayfield6579 Of course Paul would say that James approves of his telling of the gospel, Justin - ddduuuhhh... Paul was, above all, into promoting HIS gospel - in fact, he calls what he is preaching MY gospel in his epistles. This should give any serious critical thinker reason to ponder things. If you read chapter 21 of the Book of Acts, you will see that James confronts Paul over rumors he has heard that Paul has been teaching Jews of the diaspora to forsake the customs, the Law and to not have their male children circumcised. From this, we know that what Paul was teaching was NOT what James was teaching. And your take on faith versus works is a modern, after the fact one that is quite understandable - after all, this Epistle of James is in the Christian Bible, and modern Christians have to make sense of it.
@@naiman4535😂😂 you seem to either haven't read Paul's letters or just didn't understand them.
@@MrSeedi76 I'm glad that you have read Paul's letters, and that you understand them. But even more basic than this, I feel, is the question of:Was Paul a direct, personal disciple of Jesus, who actually studied with Jesus while he was in the flesh? The answer to that question is a clear NO. It's very interesting that someone who has been the main interpreter of Jesus for the West was someone who never studied with him, who was never his personal disciple. Paul bases his apostolic authority solely on the vision of the risen Christ that he had on the road to Damascus, and on other visions he had of him, presumably, but do visions really qualify one to be an apostle of a spiritual master? If the Christian religion is based primarily on Paul's visions, then you could call it a channeled religion, in much the same manner as those New Age channelers or mediums. By the way - have you read chapter 21 in the Book of Acts, in which James, the brother of Jesus, and the leader of the Jerusalem Church of Jesus' original followers after his crucifixion, confronts Paul about his teaching of a deviant doctrine? This shows that Paul was out in the field preaching a doctrine or gospel that was not in line with Jesus' original teachings.
Not a proper defense, by saying that Paul wasn't chosen it doesn't automatically mean that everything he says is factually wrong. Deceit is truth mixed with lies, you say that Jesus didn't believe that the law was enough, however the reason he came is to remind people of it. In Matthew 5:17-18 Jesus states that the law is unchanged, but in Romans 10:4 Paul says that the law is over! Jesus refers to Paul's doctrine in Matthew 13:24-30
You just take one verse out of context. I can quote verses where Paul says that we need to keep the law. That's the problem with Paul. He's hard to understand and cannot be "quote mined".
@@MrSeedi76 I can prove that he's not an apostle, he's a liar
Paul haters / grace haters love to try to keep you in bondage they hate the freedom and simplicity of the Gospel of the Grace of God
Acts was written by Luke!!! Let's see what Luke says in
Acts 13:38-39
38Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: 39And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
what does it mean to be Justified from all things, from which you could not be Justified by the law OF MOSES??????????????????????????????
is this the truth or is Luke lying!!!! if you deny Paul you deny Luke and what he writes of Paul!!! like when he wrote
Acts9:15
But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
did Luke make this up , when he said that God said Paul was his chosen vessel ??? ???????????????????????
you guys have no idea about Gods Plans his mercy or his grace , people deny Paul because they are ignorant on how to rightly divide the truth and they twist the scriptures to their own demise!! if you deny Paul you also are denying Lukes testimony of Paul and peters endorsement, the transition book of acts is written by Luke and testifies to Paul and his distinct apostleship!!
Acts 9:15
But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
according to Luke, Paul is Gods chosen vessel to bear his name amongst the gentiles!!
but according to you Paul haters he is not !! you know more than Luke ?????????????????
2Peter 3:15
And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
Peter calls Paul his ''Beloved Brother"" Peter knows more than most about false prophets' false teachers, he knows we are to call them out mark and avoid them yet he calls Paul his Beloved! was peter fooled?? but you smart guys who were not there, you know Beter than Luke , peter, Paul and by extension Christ !!!
@@wolfwatchers Luke was an apprentice of Paul, the 2 peter books have a different author. Seems like all your evidence that supports his apostlehood is either invalid or straight up fabricated. Even if you want to take Luke's word, he writes the names of the 12 apostles + the successor of Judas and these exlude Paul. In Revelation it states that there are 12 apostles of Jesus therefore he is a liar.
@@katsurakotaro its because the 12 were apostles to Israel promised the kingdom Paul was the apostle to the gentiles and the body of christ, the body goes to heaven with the angels, and Israel is resurrected into the kingdom , 2 different programs one is prophecy one is mystery one is earthly one is heavenly, one is for Israel only one is for all who believe the gospel revealed to Paul , dont you see the lies you have to tell yourself to hold your position!
2 peter was by peter, acts the entire book is called Luke 2 its by Luke only devils who try to deny Paul would ever make such a bogus Claim, !! (2 timothy 2 :15 kjv)
interesting facts also is that Paul's letters existed decades before the four gospels and many people don't know this but that's why studying history is also important
And perhaps that's why the anonymous gospels of the New Testament are very much influenced by Paul's writings, right ?? And that's why Paul's writings seem to be in line with the gospels, right ??
Or the 12 apostles heard of pauls teaching gaining traction and decided to publish their own teachings but not of their own only telling the UNBIASED truth of jesus’ story here on earth. Without their “opinions” of jesus. Only to tell their witness and testimony and glorifying his name and message.
Pauls letters….biased opinions on his claim to his testimony of a light and a voice which no one heard but him, a gospel which no one received but him not even the twelve, and a religious interpretation which built churches in HIS name and because of him. Teaching HIS gospel. With Jesus’ brand. Kinda like pastors today.
I wouldn't say this is true, Paul's letters date from 48-64 AD. It's proposed, by many, that the Gospel of Mark, which is said to be the first Gospel, was written in the 50s AD.
@@JMcGinnis96 idk where you get your information from but it was written around 70 AD and yes, it was the first gospel to be written.
@@KattyMeowstic It's not that hard to find this information. The only people who give a date of around 70 AD for Mark are Skeptics/Atheists, and they base their whole reason for this on the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem claiming that Jesus couldn't have predicted it.
3more you can be a servant to sin John 8:34 Romans 6:17 and marriage is between two people who becoming one flesh Matthew 19:5 Ephesians 5:31 Jesus came to save sinners Luke 5:32 1 Timothy 1:15
In Matthew 5:17--20 Jesus says that he did not come to abolish the law (meaning Jewish law called Torah) and he says that people who keep the commandments and teach others to do the same will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. Also, in Mark 10:17--23 a rich man asked Jesus what he must do in order to have eternal life. Jesus said that the rich man must keep all the commandments of the Torah and must sell all his possession and given the money to the poor. Paul, on the other hand, says the commandments of the Torah are no longer in effect, thereby contradicting the teaching of Jesus. Paul says in Galatians 3:21--25 that the commandments were our schoolmaster until Christ came, but now that Christ has come we are no longer under the schoolmaster. According to Galatians chapter 3, we are justified by faith in Christ, not by our adherence to the Jewish law (Torah). See also Romans 6:14, which says that Christians are under grace and not under the law. Also, In Hebrews 8:13, it is stated that Christians are under a new covenant and the old covenant (meaning the covenant between God and the Jews embodied in the Torah) is "obsolete and will soon vanish."
Apostle Paul said the MOSAIC LAW did not need to be kept by Christians.
What did Apostle Paul say in I Corinthians 7:19?
Jesus' teachings and those of apostle Paul are the same !
Question: why do we even need Paul's writings? Doesn't he elevate himself to the same position as Jesus by including them with the gospels? Why should they not be a separate book apart from the Gospels?
He doesn't elevate himself to anything as he wasn't the one who decided about the canon of the new testament.
Paul wrote about Jesus the same way the gospels wrote about Jesus actually. All writings were accounts of Jesus actually, simple
without Paul's writings we as gentiles have no way to be saved or to be reconciled to God ,
Matthew10:5-6
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Romans15:8
Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
James1:1
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
which of the 12 tribes are you from ?
Ephesians 2:11-14
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
Huh, thats like saying the Gospels of Matthew Mark Luke and John elevate themselves to the status of Jesus. Thats ludicrous
Thank you very much for your work. I just have I question I fail to answer.
Paul believed that Jesus would return in Paul's lifetime. So I wonder as to why that was the case while Jesus never explicitly told anyone when he would return. What does one make of that?
Thank you for your help.
@Mavors where ?
When it says “we who are still alive”? That’s not really him including himself in it, more so he is just referring to those who will be alive when Christ returns
@@justanotherbaptistjew5659 there are always over analysis and interpretation to make Paul's writings just.
Paul is a false prophet and teacher.
Most people believe Jesus will come in their lifetime, even today.
By Jesus' own admission, this is intentional.
If a servant is to wait by the gate with a torch for his masters return, but he knows when that will happen, then why wait at the gate at all?
Not knowing Jesus' return by design encourages us to obey Him in everything instead of just blowing it off until the last moment as we would were we to know when His return would be.
It's because Paul was a false apostle. See my Playlists. Hit the M in the circle.
If its that simple, why is it questioned?? Be wise as a serpent...it didnt matter if Paul had good doctrine or not for Peter to give it thumbs up because Paul didn't go to the churches of Jesus's interest except for 1 and seems like he had a difficult time there and also spoken about in Revelation 2:2.
( 2 Peter 3:15-16 ) “ And consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation-as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, *which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.* “
What about this?
Mat 5:18-19 KJV 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
The context seems to indicate the law of Moses and Jesus says to not break even the least of its commands.
Paul clearly says we don't have to worry about Sabbaths (our Lord's feasts He gave to Israel). What's you're take?
I'm a dispensationalist, btw, just for clarity.
I recommend my videos which expose Paul as a fraud.
@@josephpendleton4927 well, if Paul is a fraud, then how can you know Gentiles have any part in salvation?
@@ArgothaWizardWars Jesus Christ told his disciples to preach his teachings to Gentiles and make disciples of him (Matthew 28 verses 16 to 20). I covered everything in detail in my videos
@@ArgothaWizardWars I dont agree with the guy above, I believe Paul is a true apostle but to answer your question he could just say because Peter also says so. Heck, the first Gentiles that were converted came by way of Peter's preaching, not Paul's.
The law was fulfilled with Jesus's death and resurrection. Jews during that time believed that the law would end with the beginning of the messianic age.
can we copy the list of paul repeating Jesus's sayings somewhere?
edit: thanks I found it in your blog post :)
God bless you and may Gods grace be with us
Paul never quoted Jesus.
Yahushua said he was sole teacher. The true Apostles used his words. False Apostle Paul didn't quote Yahushua. He never met him in the flesh. He learned nothing from the true Apostles.
@@michelemoneywell8765are you just pulling this out of thin air? Because thats definitely not what the Bible says. So, please let us participate in your fascinating private revelations you seem to have received from God 😂😂.
@@MrSeedi76 Which item in my comment are you refuting?: 1. Yahushua said he was sole teacher. 2. The true Apostles used his words. 3. Paul didn't quote Yahushua. 4. Paul never met Yahushua in the flesh. or 5. Paul learned nothing from the true Apostles. (That was Paul's own words) Everything I said is true. Paul is the one who claimed, as you say, "fascinating private revelations...seem to have received from God."
@@DrJeffreyMSederYet many of his teachings in Romans and Galatians mimic the words of Christ very, very closely. Just a free examples include:
-Blessing those who persecute us
-Not revenging ourselves
-The “Yes, yes” or “No, no” phrase from the sermon on the mount is in 2 Corinthians but put it a different use
-Obeying and rendering to obedience, respect, etc. to those to whom it is rightly due (“Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”)
-Thw fulfillment of the Law of Moses is loving one’s neighbor as oneself
So you see, there is no good reason not to believe that Paul became acquainted with the teachings of Christ from his original Apostles and alluded to them in his own writings. The same thing can be said of the author of the letter of James.
You lost me at Jesus said all food are clean. Never said such a thing.
It is not what goes into the mouth of a man that defiles and dishonors him, but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles and dishonors him.” Matthew 15:11
@@proorno1062you should have kept reading as Messiah clarified exactly what he meant because even his own deciples were confused,
Matthew 15:19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts-murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20 These are what defile a person; 👉but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.”👈
He literally just got done accusing the Pharisees of setting aside the commandments of God for their traditions, so if he turned around and changed the laws of God himself that would make him the world's greatest hypocrite of all time. 🤔 Not only that, it would have been the quickest way to identify him as a false Messiah/prophet. As he would have failed the prophet test of deut 13. Also the disciples continue to keep the food laws well after Messiah was crucified and gone, so clearly they didn't think they could eat what God calls an abomination (swine).
Please search for the truth. Isiah 66 says those with swine in their pots on the great day of God's judgment will be consumed all together.... It's no small matter.
Paul received information from Jesus that no one else received. It was given to him alone. Jesus revealed many mysteries, through Paul.
whos to say paul wasnt lying?
@@DaddyAZTL Peter calls, Paul, a beloved brother, and that God had given him wisdom. So you could say he is definitely vouching for Paul.
2 Peter 3:15 Consider also that our Lord’s patience brings salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom God gave him.
@@rubytuby6369 just because someone is a brother doesn't make them an apsotle.
2. Jesus praised church in asia for rejecting false apostles. Paul was rejected by churches in asia.
And there lies the problem. Throughout the OT, Jesus/ Yeshua is predicted/ prophesied about. Even the OT prophets and judges that were sent by Yahweh were foreshadowed ahead of time to OTHERS. Yahweh doesn't change. There was no mystery. Yahweh and Yeshua operated in transparency not darkness and secrets. No one testifies by Paul accept Paul. That should give anyone who studies the Bible a bit of pause
Yeah, and I feel like the OT also shows how flawed people are. Even King David, a man after God's own heart, was deeply flawed. He raped a woman and then murdered her husband. The only perfect one was Jesus. So then Paul can be fallible since he is in fact not Jesus.@@mshopey32
you said of all the similarities, but you should have focused on the differences, obviously he is in the same tradition so he would naturally have similar ideas, but it's not about how similar they are, it's about the differences
Why is Paul claiming to be ou only Father through Christ Jesus
I see no contradictions with the gospels and The teachings of Jesus
there are none, it's something that the Muslims came up with to hoodwink biblically illiterate people
@@AMRsti93 verse?
@@AMRsti93 Jesus was never speaking directly to you or anyone else alive today.
@@AMRsti93 You had to twist and add 'spiritual' to your message, plus that ain't what he said.
I Corinthians 4:15 NKJV
For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel.
By the way, Jesus was not saying "You can't call anyone a father', as the scripture also teaches Honor your father, and your mother. And I'm sure you've called your father, father in life (provided you have one).
That being said, The word Jesus uses for 'father' is
patḗr - father; one who imparts life and is committed to it; a progenitor, bringing into being to pass on the potential for likeness.
So, Jesus points us back to God, the one whose image we were made to bear in Genesis. (Let Us make man in Our Image, after Our likeness.)
@Texas Blues Are you surprised they didn't really look? They really do put Paul above Jesus and then say you are part of a cult for not believing Paul's story of his conversion in the wilderness where Jesus says he won't be found.
3:34 but werent the authors of the synoptic gospel themselves either students of and/or influenced by Paul? So to say that Paul echoes anything from the Gospels…it would be the other way around. Or no?
No. The gospel of Mark (Matthew probably too, depends on who you believe came first) was already written before Paul wrote any of his letters.
You just listed every instance where we dont need Paul 1:30 . If Jesus already taught us everything, why did Paul have to say it again
Just like how Moses needs to retell the law in deuteronomy after exodus. That was for a new generation of israelites(deuteronomy means second law) Paul does so for the gentiles.
If any prophet adds to or diminishes from YHVH's Words/ Law, he is a false prophet. That's YHVH's Words. So, if you or I or Yehowshuwa or Sha'uwl (aka Paul) or anyone changes The Law, you know without doubt, controversy, or need for study that the person is a false prophet. Otherwise, anyone could contradict YHVH's Words and no one could prove that the person was a false prophet, because he could say YHVH sent me to say - He has changed His Mind. This is precisely what Pharisaic Judaism, Catholicism, and Christianity has done. Come out of Babylon before it's too late. Yehowshuwa never broke The Law. That is why the religious authorities had to find false accusers. Wakeup or you will be one of the ones that Yehowshuwa said - And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity (lawlessness). MattithYAHu 7:23 KJV
Luke 5:32
I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
1 Timothy 1:15
This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.
They should read much of what is written in the English New Testament of Matthew Mark Luke and John and read the epistles Paul wrote after the book of Acts following him meeting Jesus Christ when that heavenly vision happened on the road to Damascus when he was lost Saul of Tarsus. I find a lot of what Paul wrote in these epistles to tie into and relate to what Jesus Christ spoke in these books in the New Testament.
God bless you❤️
Everyone remember, we all have flaws and are imperfect. Every disciple is the same way.
I don't know but I studied with Messianic Jews for some time and it was generally thought that the Skeptics are right, because Jesus never knew Paul, Paul had visions of grandeur and his own ideas and committed blasphemy, and with his many epistles that fill the new testament, his ideas stuck. Because he seemed official and knowledgeable even though he never even was an apostle. He was merely a prolific writer. Paul was no doubt a great supporter of the growing Christian Movement. Where he stumbled is that in order to make it more palatable to the various cultures in the area at the time, he changed some things up a bit, threw in a few of his own, all which clearly contradict Jesus.
Your theory lacks in Biblical reference. Means nothing really. Bring points where Paul differ with Jesus based on scriptures.
So do you feel there is room to believe in Jesus and what he did one the cross, but disagree with many of Paul's teachings? I feel like, in the case of women, Jesus actually treated women with a lot of respect and dignity. Paul's tone is actually quite different towards women. I've heard and seen a lot of arguments trying to say that Paul was not being disparaging to women, but I feel he clearly was in several spots.
@@user-gb2gw9zm6k I do not see divergence between Paul and Jesus teaching. Both preach as the main core, Love is the greatest commandment, believe in Jesus is God's requirement from man and need to achieve a transformation from earthly to spiritual life. Differences in treatment to women (if it exists) is ancillary so i would appreciate examples
I think the clearest examples are 1 Timothy 2: 9-15 "A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet", and Luke 10 where Mary, the sister of Martha is sitting at Jesus's feet. The 1 Timothy reference has been used against women for a long time, as a reason we're not allowed to preach. Paul seems to be "putting women in their place". But in Luke 10, Jesus allows Mary to participate in an activity only men at the time could do. He allows her to act as a disciple in this moment. There's a really good book called Jesus Feminist, which I would recommend if you want more examples of how Jesus elevated women. This author also attempts to justify why Paul was saying such things in 1 Timothy, and I've seen other arguments. They're decent arguments if you only want to hold to Paul needing to be right about everything. But I also think it makes just as much sense to say he was wrong.
@@user-gb2gw9zm6k You are reading feminist arguments into the gospel message which is difficult for me to reconcile with. As earlier said, the message of Jesus is really simply, he brought the good news of reconciling the world to God through him. And this is exactly what Paul preached
The descriptions of Jesus in the gospels are narratives while Paul's letters are essay arguments so the comparison here is not really proper. Did Jesus in any way say women should exercise authority over men? Did Paul in anyway argue that women should not hear the word of God?
Paul was a disciple of Jesus and there were many female disciples of Jesus before and after Paul. Jesus gave his disciples the great commission to go and make disciples of all men and in 2 Corinthians 5:20, Paul agrees that we (all, male and female disciples) are ambassadors of Christ pleading to the world to be reconciled. Same Paul said, there is no male nor female in the body of Christ. Galatians 3:28-29. He also recognized the authorities and importance of Timothy's mother and Grand Mother.
Paul greets Prisca, Junia, Julia, and Nereus' sister, who worked and traveled as missionaries in pairs with their husbands or brothers (Romans 16:3, 7, 15). He tells us that Prisca and her husband risked their lives to save his. He praises Junia as a prominent apostle, who had been imprisoned for her labor. Mary and Persis are commended for their hard work (Romans 16:6, 12). Euodia and Syntyche are called his fellow-workers in the gospel (Philippians 4:2-3).
We should note the true intent of the gospel of Jesus. This is to reconcile us with God and assure our eternal salvation. Unfortunately human trends always discolor this. Feminisms is a trend and will do it's time but Jesus and all his disciples recognized and respected women.
The other apostles never endorsed Pauls writings. Do you not find it a bit odd that Pauls Jesus told him to leave Jerusalem in acts 22:18 rather than just appear to them and tell them Paul was legit? The reason for that was because he wasn't the same Jesus that the apostles knew and had a different way of salvation. Read Daniel 7 where he says about the laws and times being changed and tell me who changed them? Certainly wasn't Jesus as he tells us again in Revelation to obey them. Jesus said to enter into life keep the commandments and Paul says they do the opposite. Yahuah (God - a title not his name) and Yahusha (Jesus- also not his name) and the prophets all had the same message only Pauls is different. Who do we believe? Also all scripture isn't holy spirit inspired or there'd be no removing of names or words changed to suit peoples religion. All you need to do is read the books that were in the bible and removed and you'll see why Paul's a fraud and modern religions are all on the wrong path. There's 1 way and it's the way we were told to walk since the beginning. Revelation 12:17 you side with the dragon if you don't obey the commandments and the testimony of Yahusha/Jesus. People need to wake up before it's too late and people like you teaching others bad doctrine will have to answer to Yahuah as to why you didn't obey his voice and led others astray. Read Malachi 4 it's a future event and verse 4 has a warning for us before it happens.
more lies from the enemy! you fail to rightly dive the truth and that's Paul's fault!!! (2 timothy 2:15 kjv )
Matthew10:5-6
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Romans15:8
Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
James1:1
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
which of the 12 tribes are you from ?
Ephesians 2:11-14
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;
ask your bishop, Pope, or priest when times past ended and when but now began? and when did God take down the middle wall of partition !
then ask him if a mystery hid in God kept secret since the beginning of the world is active and known before God reveals it !!
Ephesians 3:1-6 Ephesians 3:9 Romans 16:25-26
Have you EVER read 2 Peter? He warns of people like you who twist pauls writings because youre unlearned and unstable.
@@vladgor4099 I'm well learned and pretty stable. Try reading the book and listening to the words of the one who created you not follow lawless Paul to destruction.
@@vladgor4099 Peter was speaking to people of that time we have the fullness of the scriptures and the technology to study the truth , but cute cop out ! here is some of Pauls writings ill let you interpret them
Titus3:5
He saved us, not by the righteous deeds we had done, but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit.
Ephesians 2:8-9
For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.
Philippians 3:9
and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith.
Romans1:17
For the gospel reveals the righteousness of God that comes by faith from start to finish, just as it is written: “ The righteous will live by faith.”
Romans 4:5
But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,
Romans 4:6
And David speaks likewise of the blessedness of the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
Romans 5:1
Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
Romans 5:9
Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him…
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Romans8:1
Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus
Romans 8:39
nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
colossians1:20
and through Him to reconcile to Himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through the blood of His cross.
2 corrin 5:19
For God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, no longer counting people’s sins against them. And he gave us this wonderful message of reconciliation.
@@Bouncer83 I’ve read enough of the Lord to know you’re a liar. You’re self proclaimed as “ taught “
“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools”
I could care less about what you think you know. You deny Peter and you deny Paul. By extension you deny the other apostles and you deny the Lord Yeshua, Jesus Christ.
But go on, tell me how Paul is an antichrist so that i can destroy your satanic arguments and logic that you steal from muslims arguments, by the Spirit of truth.
I still believe based upon my reading of the New Testament that Paul went much farther than Jesus, despite the similarities you list here. Paul invented entire Christian "principles" like the man being the head of the wife... Jesus never mentioned that. To sum it up, Paul took a general philosophy of Jesus based on love and kindness, and turned it into a dogma of church structure, sin and damnation. Jesus was the enigmatic prophet; Paul was the hard-headed bureaucrat who built the structure and unleashed today's rigid Christianity on the world. Whether today's Christians deem Paul right or wrong... I just never cared for him. I read his letters over and over again... and never sensed the loving Christ in him. Jesus (if he existed as portrayed) was the real deal. Saul/Paul was just a latter-day scribe. Here in the 21st century, it really is Paul's church.
But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
1 Corinthians 2:15
You can find the gospel that Paul preaches in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, believing in the death, burial and resurrection (DBR) of Jesus.
No one, including Jesus and his apostles preaches the same gospel in Matthew, Mark, Luke or John.
If you can find it there, please show me where it is.
The gospels teach that Jesus died on the cross, was buried and then resurrected
@@user-cw5og8dc3l
Does it also teach that the Law would be done away with immediately after? Because thats the other caveat that Paul introduces.
@@Joe-pc3hs the church fathers approved of Paul
Apostle Paul said Christians don't need to keep the Mosaic law bit that God's Commandments are to be obeyed.
I Corinthians 7:19
@@endtimesareuponus8930 Are you suggesting that Moses gave a Law that didnt come from God?
New Covenant Whole Gospel:
Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him.
He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth.
Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by
husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
Watch the TH-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
That's not the gospel Yahushua preached. He preached the Coming Kingdom of Yah. He came to reveal the Father and to turn people back to Torah. He wanted people to obey the Law, not do away with it. Stop following Paul. Stick with Yahushua's words only (and history) in the New Testament and all the Old Testament.
@@michelemoneywell8765 There are two different sets of commandments in the verse below. See what John said in the second passage, which confirms this fact.
Joh 15:10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.
1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
Why didn’t Jesus give us a heads up about Paul but rather cautioned several times that prior to His Second Coming, “many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many”. How do we know Christian mass persecutor Saul of Tarsus wasn’t one of them?
The book of acts was written by Luke not Paul and it testifies to Paul's distinct apostleship and calling, and peter endorses Paul in
2peter 3:15-16
And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Peter warns of false teachers more than most !! yet he calls Paul his beloved. !!!!
Paul lacks credibility in a lot of fundamental ways: who he says he is, no direct contact with jesus, challenging with disciples instead of learning from them. If he wrote before the gospels it makes even LESS SENSE to believe it because its his own construction, without benefit of study or counsel. What paul says opposes what christians say jesus taught. Why throw away jesus and the disciples for paul? That seems like a lousy trade. Mary and John the baptist confirm that Jesus was sent by God. But NOBODY can confirm Paul, except himself. He just showed up and started talking, the geoge santos of the ancient world. This does NOT seem like a reasonable bet to take, where the soul is concerned.
GET A RED-LETTER BIBLE. FOLLOW THE WORD OF GOD. PROBLEM SOLVED.
If God allowed Paul in the Bible, he cannot be contradictory to the gospel. How people interpret is key. Also, his teachings were before grace
2 Peter 3:15-16
and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation-as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
2 Peter was rejected by the early church as a fraud.
@@DrJeffreyMSeder It doesn't change the truth. I will pray for you.
@@quiet-strength thanks, goto TH-cam channel Jesus’ Words Only and do some studying about imposter Paul.
@@DrJeffreyMSeder No thank you. I do not believe Paul is an imposter and I do not care to learn from anyone who does.
@@quiet-strength So Paulbis your Lord and Savior? He cannot be questioned!
problem here is Peter must have forgot to tell him one of the most important things that Jesus explained to call no man teacher call no man rabbi call no man call no man father there is but one teacher Jesus Christ there is but one father Our Father in heaven quite a concern because Paul advocated to continue in the tradition to have priests rabbis and teachers it's straight from the words of Jesus teaching
You make some really good points, let’s not forget Jesus said to not change one tittle in the Bible (he was Jewish so the Torah or TaNak) until all is finished in gods plan for humanity. And if Jesus’s death completed that, than we’re all in heaven, no more plan. But that’s not the case.
I wait every day for one of your videos to go up. #GodBlessYourWork 🙏
People who think Paul is out of line with Jesus of the gospels forget that the gospel says: Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
Paul is the example of greater works.
very instghtfull
Yes, WORKS! Yahushua was all about works and OBEDIENCE to the Law. Paul was about grace alone, not works, and do what thy wilt.
@@michelemoneywell8765 ya, I whole heartedly disagree, seeing as how grace is spoken of throughout the whole bible from Genesis to Revelation, hard to believe it was the only thing Paul taught.
@@afternoonshred4866 Show me a Scripture where Yahushua talked about grace or saved by grace. He didn't.
@@michelemoneywell8765 you can find it in Exodus, 2nd Samuel, the psalms, Job, and all over the prophets. Research don’t just take the word of those that enslave you in to a cult/congregation. Question everything, including yourself.
Furthermore Jesus taught there would be many false Christ that would lead us astray from his teachings that is why he said do not follow man because man is decieved and deceitful follow the words of Jesus who spoke the message given to him doing the will of his father put no man above another because we are all equal in the eyes of God even Jesus explained he was our brother and he only came to do the will of his father which he did even upon his leaving he explained that he was our brother john
20:17 he explained he was ascending to his father so to tell the disciples to tell his brothers that he is ascending to his father and their father his God and😮 their God
So sad to see certain Chrisians turning on Paul.... the Apostle to the gentiles.
I did not come but to the lost sheep of the house of israel-Jesus christ
@@dazedconfused-xv4zy Matthew 28:18: "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and 9f the Holy Ghost:" also Jesus Christ.
@@AnonyMe-qy5vz Yea but his message is mainly for israel the people not what is currently being said is israel a state but ISRAEL IS about jews Black, Native Americans and Mexicans but yes none jews are included
@@dazedconfused-xv4zy How far does mainly go? It says baptizing "all nations", so what is the difference? And what are they baptised into? A lesser form of existence than you?
@@dazedconfused-xv4zy get that BHI crap out of here
There's no different in Jesus and Paul teaching it's like the word said some of Paul teaching are hard to be understood.
Paul never met Jesus ,,, we all know the oral info transmission changes from a person to a person ... And understanding varies in people brains based on the goals and belief .... And Jesus said that He didn't come to change the law of previous prophets thus none of previous prophets taught trinity , but in Paul's teaching are .... Dear once u change the core of something completely u changed everything even if it may appear not changed...
Excellent video but Paul did not teach that people don't need to follow the ten commandments but instead he taught that we are not saved by the "works of the law", which from the Dead Sea scrolls we now know means the ritualistic works proscribed by later copies of the Torah, especially Deuteronomy.
how did you learn that that was what he was talking about?If you haveva link to the study material please share
@@southsidetherealest2860 I suggest you read Dr John Bergsma's relatively new book: Jesus and the Dead Sea scrolls. He's a professor and did his PhD on the Dead Sea scrolls and he shows that the earliest Jewish Christians were Essenes living in the rural communities around Jerusalem and even outside of Israel and that John the Baptist and very possibly Jesus and the Holy family were intimately linked to them. As a matter of fact many if not most of Jesus's teachings which we thought were unique to him actually predate him in the Dead Sea scrolls community, and John the Baptist May well have grown up in their monastery at Quamran. 😊
@@jspanyer thanks for the info
Yahushua said if you love me obey the commandments. He said not one jot or tittle of the law is done away. All Torah law that applies to us is still in effect. Paul was a liar and a false apostle. Read Rev 2:2 -- The Church at Ephesus tested him. You should too. Read Rev 21:14 Only 12 Apostles. Paul would be 13. (Mattias replaced Judas.)
@@michelemoneywell8765read "Acts" to check if all the law applies to gentile Christians. It clearly doesn't. That was one of the main struggles of the early church. Do gentiles need to become jews before becoming Christians. The decision was clearly - no. So stop twisting the Bible.
Basic answer, no it’s us who can understand Paul and think he’s teaching things he isn’t. Claiming he stands for things he stands against and against things he stands as a foundation on.
Rite people don’t get it Paul can’t teach nothing dat wasn’t already taught bye Jesus so if you get wat Jesus was saying but when u read Paul teaching and fill like he saying something against Jesus dat means u miss understood wat Paul was saying I forgot wat book it was in but I’m one of the books one of the disciples said dat da way Paul teach will lead people to destruction cause it’s hard to understand wat he mean dats why if you notice if you have a convo with someone and u tell dem wat Jesus said they will tell you you miss understanding wat Jesus meant and when they try to tell you wat Jesus said they quote from Paul that’s why alot of preachers preach from Paul da devil also know u not understanding Paul he got a hold of the preachers teaching a fake gospel
@@504Chosenone Paul in Rom14: 14, 1Cor6: 12-13, 1Cor8 and 1Cor10:23 establishes that everything is acceptable to eat. Up to including foods sacrificed to idols. No where does Yeshua (Jesus) teach that. As a matter of fact, He condemns that doctrine in Revelation 2.
Paul: "everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved."
Jesus: "“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
It can't be "everyone" and "not everyone" at the same time.
One of them is lying.
Jesus preached a gospel to Israel in his earthly ministry, believe on him as the Messiah.. Jesus, from glory, revealed the gospel of grace to Paul, believe in Jesus' atoning death on the cross for our sins, his burial and resurrection, and be saved 1 Cor 15: 1-4.
Yes, it is very much at odds. Jesus said: John 11:25-26 New King James Version 25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. 26 And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?”
On the other hand, Paul said: 1 Thessalonians 4:16 New King James Version 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.
Jesus did not say, Thou art Paul and on this rock I will build my church.
Catholic church is HERESY
Read this about Apostle Paul...! (I Corinthians 14:37) Then read this about Apostle Paul..! (Acts 9:15) Read one more: (Acts 26:16-18)
Excellent! Thank you!
In Mark 7, Jesus rebukes the Pharisees and scribes for condemning those who eat with "unwashed" hands. Jesus does not rebuke any of the dietary laws, but only the addition of requiring "washed hands" before eating. This kind of addition was actually prohibited by Moses
Then the Pharisees and some of the scribes came together to Him, having come from Jerusalem. 2 Now when they saw some of His disciples eat bread with defiled, that is, with unwashed hands, they found fault. -Mark 7:1-2 (NKJV)
Jesus corrected the false view that not washing your hands before eating defiled you. This is made explicit in Matthew's gospel:
"Do you not yet understand that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and is eliminated? 18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man. 19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies. 20 These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man."
Not only this Peter have arugment with the paul on the dietry law... So you think peter doesnt knew the law, peter was the one who was with the jesus not the paul
My best case against their case (that I will not even try to explain or understand)
Paul asked God to curse someone teaching a different gospel. Not much love I’m that.
Actually Jesu flogged the evil people trading in the temple remember? Preaching a different gospel is evil.
@@innocentodinkemere4597, Jude and James said you shouldn’t curse people.
@@wserthmar8908 And what did Jesus say?
@@wserthmar8908 And what exactly did Paul, James and Jude say, you have to bring up the verses
@@innocentodinkemere4597 Jude 1:9:
But Michael the archangel, when he disputed with the devil and argued about the body of Moses, did not dare pronounce against him a railing judgment, but said, "The Lord rebuke you!"
James 4:12:
There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the One who is able to save and to destroy; but who are you who judge your neighbor?
James 3:8-10: But no one can tame the tongue; it is a restless evil and full of deadly poison. With it we bless our Lord and Father, and *with it we curse men, who have been made in the likeness of God; from the same mouth come both blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not to be this way.*
Matthew 12:36-37:
But I tell you that every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for it in the day of judgment. For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned."
Awesome video man! Take care
Please take a moment and pray for Jeff and Shay to be reconciled in marriage. Thank you.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH!
But Paul said Jesus will come in clouds and believers will be raptured and meet him in the air. So there is a contradiction
@@kimchan6887
Hi James
Jesus will return to earth
Believers will be caught up to meet him in the air and land with him probably near Jerusalem
That way if a believer is in Tennessee when Jesus comes, he doesn’t have to catch a plane to Israel
This is a Parousia
A royal person coming
So you go out to meet him and escort him into the city
Similar to what people did to Paul when he came to Rome, they went out of the city to meet him and escorted him in
Or if an important person pulls on your driveway you don’t sit in the house and wait for them
You go out and meet them and escort them in
This is well known
NT Wright is big in this
There is no contradiction
Jesus is coming back
Believers will be caught up to meet him and descend with him to the earth
Mitchell C preaches a false gospel. Stay away from his false teachings.
Paul received revelation from the Risen LORD JESUS CHRIST that he says was kept hid from the foundation of the world as a mystery which the sons of God didn’t know until him. I always rightly divide and understand Paul is my apostle because he received divine revelation of Jesus Christ as something not known by the 12 until him.
so you believe a random guy who says hey guys yea you were literally with jesus but he appeared to me and me alone and told me things he NEVER told you guys? what sense does that make?
Jesus preached following the law and gave ways to better follow it.
paul is a false prophet. peter was the apostle to the gentiles.
@@DaddyAZTLabsolute nonsense!
Yeah. King Jesus forgot some stuff, and thank goodness Paul along came along to clear it up. After all, Jesus broke His promise for Paul, and got off His throne and CAME BACK for him, so he must be important. He wasnt supposed to come back until EVERY eye would see and every knee would bow. Whoopsie. Even John had to be taken to heaven for Revelation, Jesus didnt even come back for John, but Jesus corrected so many of His mistakes through Paul. That whole warning about "dont listen to any creepy dudes in the wilderness false prophet" thing was just Jesus misspeaking, Im sure. Glad Jesus went back on that, too, beause now, we can all just have Paul, and ANY time Paul SEEMS to contradict Jesus, all the scholar types Jesus LOVED so much can just make videos and write books telling us a bunch of word salad about "What Paul MEANT TO SAY was...." and we can all just throw out the whole if you love me obey Me thing Jesus repeated over and over and over. Obedience is overrated, and we dirty pagans wouldnt want obedience and good works around! - and the whole, "I didnt come to abolish the law" thing. PHEW. Glad that got thrown out. Paul also told us what Isaiah, and King David meant to say, too, and lots of other Old Testament dudes who clearly twisted Pauls eventual perfect message out of context. Im glad 3 billion people follow Paul - seems like a pretty wide gate to me, I guess Jesus messed that up, too with that narrow gate idea. Its not like Jesus came to do away with all the temple sacrifices in Leviticus or anything, you know - the "unintentional sin offering" in Lev. 4 - while asking His followers to OBEY and repent. Hebrews 10 mistakenly talks about - if you keep deliberate sin you are disrespecting His work on the cross! Glad thats gone. It actually said - and how much greater is the punishment for those He sanctified (Lev 4) and then kept sinning!! Forget all that, its just silly. Say a Jesus prayer for 30 seconds and its good. Thanks, Paul!!
@@the3lewisgirls John The Revelator had a vision from Jesus, I dont think a Vision is Jesus getting "off his throne"
Christian is the followers of jesus. It means follow what jesus said and doing. May he defend us from the dajjal in the end of time 🙏🏼
Jesus taught us to keep the commandments and all those keeping the commandments will have eternal life. Paul taught that the commandments, the law, are curses. Even Calling Jesus himself a curse Gal 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
Paul also says that no one speaking in the power of God calls Jesus accursed (A fact that Paul is not of God).
Paul said there are none righteous no not one. Luke 1:5-6 Says Zacharias and Elizabeth were both Righteous and kept the commandments perfectly. Paul even contradicts himself again in Acts 10: 22“Cornelius the centurion has sent us,” they said. “He is a righteous and God-fearing man with a good reputation among the whole Jewish nation.
Paul Says his unrighteousness and his lies bring out Gods righteousness and God's Glory in ROM 3.
Paul is the false apostle mentioned in REV 2 that the church of Ephesus proved to be a liar. Study this yourself
First of all, you have no understanding of the Abrahamic covenant for the Jews and their Old Testament promises from God for an Earthly kingdom involving the first advent of Jesus.
Jesus fulfilled all the signs and miracles expected of the Messiah as written long ago by the prophets, and so offered Himself indeed as God the Son to be the Jews' King and Messiah, the New Testament making it clear that Jesus and the apostles were to go to nobody BUT THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL - preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom - that Jesus is the King and Messiah, believe that, repent and be baptized! - and once the Jews would have ALL believed then they could have gone on to spread that GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM to all the ends of the Earth ( - but knowing that the Jews would reject Him, Jesus only days before His crucifixion begins to tell them He will be put to death, but will rise again - although God the Father kept the apostles from understanding exactly what that meant - but it was the reason the visiting Gentile Greeks were not allowed to see Jesus - "until the seed falls into the ground and dies"...)
Even after Jesus' resurrection, the apostles - all Temple-going, Law-abiding Jews ONLY preached the Gospel of the Kingdom (believe only that Jesus is Messiah, repent and be baptized) TO THE JEWS ONLY. This was the only gospel message up until the stoning of Stephen - an act which temporarily set aside God's program with the Jews (until after the rapture of the Body of Christ, when the 144,000 Jews will once again take up that Kingdom gospel message and spread it to the ends of the Earth, as they were supposed to do in Christ's first advent - and the Jews do that in the soon-coming 7 year Tribulation period, also known as Daniel's 70th week of the Jews - the last "week" in which God culminates His program for the Jews).
Secondly, and much more seriously, you then have a completely blasphemous misunderstanding of what God did next through the conversion of Paul, which was to extend His salvation to not only Jews, but Gentiles as well.
Paul's GOSPEL OF GRACE is that Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection affords those ( - who believe in that particular act upon the cross and subsequent resurrection for salvation - ) the indwelling of the Holy Spirit; and the Law, which never changed the spirit of anyone anyway, was replaced by grace - since those believing solely in Christ and Him crucified and that alone for salvation are imputed the righteousness of Christ and have their spirit born again, as their previously separated-from-God dead spirit in thrall to satan is, through that specific belief in that one and only proper object of faith, Christ and Him crucified, joined with the spirit of Christ in death, nailing to the cross the old Adamic nature AND God BRINGING TO LIFE the new spirit joined unto Himself, just as God the Father resurrected God the Son Jesus to eternal life.
THIS IS THE GOSPEL OF GRACE TO THE GENTILES given to Paul by Jesus Himself.
Read the book of Acts. It explains this transition FROM the gospel of the kingdom ( - meant only for the Jews, and later Gentiles after all Jews believed - which was not done in the first advent, but was indeed preached by Jesus, then by Peter and the other apostles - ) TO Paul's gospel of grace.
Even the apostles had a problem with the transition, which is why Paul met with them in Jerusalem, as recorded in the Book of Acts in the Bible!
Peter, in his second epistle makes it clear that Paul is correct, even though it was hard for Jews like Himself, steeped in Temple-going and keeping the Law, how Gentiles could be saved simply by faith alone in Christ and Him crucified.
THIS IS THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE MESSAGE AND YOU ENDANGER YOUR SOUL BY BLASPHEMING AGAINST IT!
@@shanequa555 I have over 10 years of bible schooling, attended 3 Bible colleges. I serve as a missionary in Morogoro,Tanzania. I have some knowledge. Here is my question to you, When Jesus was asked "what must I do to inherit eternal life" what were His responses?
@@Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught Who was it that asked this question, and when did they ask it? (I already know the answers to these questions, but only ask you in hopes that by reflecting on this and clarifying some important distinctions, you'll come to recognize your tragically errant conclusions).
@@shanequa555 You think you know. That is why you don't look it up. You are going to be shocked when you see that Jesus said that in order to have eternal life you must keep the commandments.
@@Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught Jesus told Israelites for them to have eternal life they must keep the commandments not gentiles or the body of Christ, you been studying 10 years and haven't figured out the difference between the nation of Israel and the body of Christ !!!! you fail to rightly divide (2timothy2:15) and this is where your error is !!!
Matthew10:5-6
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Romans15:8
Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
James1:1
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
which of the 12 tribes are you from ?
Ephesians 2:11-12
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
The teachings that agree with each other are expected. It's the teachings that don't agree that matters. And there are many teachings that differ. But if only 1 differ from Jesus's teaching, then Paul would be a false prophet.
What's an example?
Even Paul knows he's a lier. He says as much in his own words and yes his teachings are fundamentally different. Romans 3:7
Scared of looking above/below that verse?
7 Someone might argue, “If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?” 8 Why not say-as some slanderously claim that we say-“Let us do evil that good may result”? Their condemnation is just!
Aren't you afraid of standing before Almighty, for twisting scriptures?
@@YouSeeTheProof Not at all. 3:7 is a direct statement.
All foods are clean ? Jesus never said this. And Peters dream was about people .
it's in Mark 7
@@TestifyApologetics Thanks for the response, but that’s not what Mark 7 v15 means. If you believe it, so be it. Have a nice day.
yeah, it's pretty clear that is what it means, as does everything else we read in the NT. I will have a nice day and will probably have a pork steak.
@@TestifyApologetics enjoy
Jesus saved me . Healed me. Ppeoople quoote Paul but do jot do what jesus said. So... Ill atick w jesus as i have comoared their words. Jesus speaks onyp rhe Fauthors Word not pauls. Paul touches on aome truths that they dont want to dela with like the spiritual dicipline it takes to reach the place of rev 2 and overcome the world be of good cheer restore the inner churches. Dont preach till ya do ! It wasnt Paul who met me in my darkest hour YO it was The LORD Himself He the chi in Christ is Gods Love Light .. ancient hebrew word for heart is LEV... Not re- legion Ysh ( seperate yet joined) uweh ( to the Way of the breath of life) thats why paul quoters but dont follow Jesus words hate us so much..hearts not in in it. Paul touches on truths but secretly leaving out important qis and adding his own attitude into it. Divider of disciplines.. desciples. ..best folllow jesus then youll underatand the kindgom is within❤
You didn't really show how to harmonize the apparent differences in soteriology.
I agree that this video needs a sequel. These are big topics that need more than a few minutes.
Because Paul breaks away from Jesus' sayings, teachings, and instructions.
Nothing but facts here
The gospels are not the same . That's why you are commanded in 2 Timothy 2:15 to rightly divide the word of truth. Jesus preached the gospel of the kingdom specifically to the nation of Israel. The purpose of this gospel is to redeem the earth through the nation of Israel. Jesus gave the gospel of grace to Paul from heaven specifically for the body of Christ which is neither Jew nor Gentile. The purpose of this gospel is to redeem the heavens.
All you have to do is compare and contrast Acts 3:21& Romans 16:25 to c that something spoken ( prophecy concerning Christ) and something kept secret ( the mystery concerning the body of Christ given to Paul) ARE NOT THE SAME!
Prove that Yahushua gave the gospel of grace to Paul. The only word you have of that being true is Paul's! Satan gave Paul his gospel; he certainly didn't get it from Yahushua.
@@michelemoneywell8765 prove he didn't
@@dealexander4751 Proof is in the Bible. No where is it recorded other than Paul's own words that Yahushua made Paul an Apostle. Yahushua personally selected, trained and taught 12 Apostles while he was in the flesh. Mattias replaced Judas by divine lot. Qualifications: must have been with Yahushua from his baptism onward. Paul didn't qualify. He never met Yahushua in the flesh. He doesn't even quote Yahushua. It doesn't even make sense that Yahushua would call a 13th Apostle, especially one who never knew him. Rev 21:14 shows there can only be 13 Apostles. Rev 2:2 shows Paul to be a false apostle. Lots more evidence in the videos in the Playlists on my channel.
@@michelemoneywell8765 the bible not an intellectual book it is a spiritual book which is why you are in ignorance
@@michelemoneywell8765 wrong , there can only be 12 apostles but Paul specifically said he was not of the 12 . His apostleship was to the gentiles. I suggest that you actually read Paul's epistles before you comment on something you are clueless about
Satan used God's word to deceive. Just because Paul has some truths doesn't mean Paul is not deceiving. Paul supports the law and also denounces it. Seek and you will find.
Supports and denounces?
@@YouSeeTheProof yes you can find Paul supporting to follow the law as he also claims the law has been nailed to the cross. SEEK AND YOU WILL FIND.
_Jesus was not at odds with the Holy Spirit. But per Acts 16:6 Paul's preaching the word in Asia is at odds with the Holy Spirit.
_If Paul was “forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia” and Paul went to Asia and preached anyway... ? Why wouldn't the church of Ephesus reject Paul as a false apostle,_
_(Apostle means he that is sent.)_
G652 ἀπόστολος apostolos ap-os'-tol-os
From G649; a delegate; specifically an ambassador of the Gospel; officially a commissioner of Christ (“apostle”), (with miraculous powers): - apostle, messenger, he that is sent.
_(Paul was not sent but forbidden by the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia Minor; per Acts 16:6)_
Acts 16:6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia,
_Acts 18:19 Paul continued to Ephesus (Ephesus was the Roman capital of Asia Minor)._
_The church of Ephesus is the only candlestick in Revelation which Paul writes to._
Revelation 2:1 Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks;
Revelation 2:2 I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:
_For Paul to claim he was an apostle in Asia, is to claim he was sent to Asia, which would make Paul a liar. Per Acts 16:6_
Ephesians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:
but if you read on in Acts 16, the context is made clear; he was forbidden of the Holy Ghost to go into Asia at that time, because God wanted him to go to Macedonia; he wasnt forbidden forever but just then in order that he would be sent where God wanted him to be at that time
@@fowlkesbrian _You have posted:_ "but if you read on in Acts 16, the context is made clear; he was forbidden of the Holy Ghost to go into Asia *at that time,* because God wanted him to go to Macedonia; *he wasnt forbidden forever..."*
_The words "at that time" are added words not found in that verse Acts 16:6._
_Also he wasn't forbidden forever is also not in the verse, perhaps if people do not add or take away from the verses then it will really mean what it really says._
Yes, Paul is a false apostle, a LIAR. Yet people keep defending him and twisting things. Like you saying, oh, he wasn't a false apostle, he just wasn't supposed to go to Asia at that time. Your mind is so muddied. Yahushua never called Paul, he never made Paul an apostle. Paul made himself an apostle and hijacked The Way, and now you believe in a gospel of grace which Yahushua never taught and you disregard the Law, which Yahushua said would remain until heaven and earth pass away.
@@michelemoneywell8765the liar here is you. All of the apostles decided TOGETHER that gentile Christians need not follow the whole law. That was one of the main struggles of the early church. And they were within their right to decide that. They received the spirit that would teach them.
Fun fact for you (even though you seem allergic to facts) - Luke wrote the gospel according to Luke as well as Acts. Even the most liberal scholars believe that, even though some don't believe it was Luke but they still believe it was the same author. So how come Luke didn't think there was a contradiction between the two texts? Nobody here believes your lies and twisting of the truth.
Paul was taught by Jesus.
Well said
Good work but The ending more detail
Nonsense.
Bam!
Who gave Paul the authority to change the laws?
Or he is simply a liar.
Paul said the MOSAIC law didn't need to be followed by Christians because Jesus fulfilled the law.
Apostle Paul said to keep God's Commandments !
@endtimesareuponus8930
You didn't answer me!
who gave him the authority?
Who is Paul? really...
Why do you believe Paul? Who gave him the title "apostle"? On what grounds?
@@endtimesareuponus8930
fulfilled the law?! What law? How can you fulfil a law? Was it conditional and timed? do you have any authentic sources to back your claim you believe in? Are you not confused? i would be very confused. if I believe in the bible, thanks to the one true God for giving us a golden standard ( the Holy Quran)to understand the bible and the meaning of life.
@endtimesareuponus8930
Was isaiah 42 fulfilled ?
Did Jesus have been to the mountain of Sala?
I stopped listening when he said, Jesus said all fiods were clean. That was added to the end of what he was saying about eating with dirty hands, not what they were eating, jews never concider what is unclean food in the first place. I wonder how many times these things went from margins to parathesis to become part of the original text? Sources say, a lot.
You are right that the Pharisees started out by asking the question about washing hands, but in Mathew 15:11 Jesus specifically said:
"What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean' "
It is not just the unwashed hands that enters the mouth, more importantly it is the food that enters the mouth. It is not what physically enters us that matters, but what our heart are filled with, and comes out of our mouth (Luke 6:45 might also ties in here)
But yes, I do agree with you that we should also look at the context, though I don't think that really changes the implication of what Jesus said here.
@@josephdu1952 line upon line and precept upon precept. He was a Jew speaking to Jews, many things you it as scriptures says is not food for you (Israel)
@@josephdu1952 Isaiah 66:16,17
@@heleniyahabukarsh513 sorry, I don't think I understand what you mean...
like yea he is most certainly a Jew talking to other Jews... it should takes understanding of the context and Jewish laws, definitely with you there. I just don't see how that changes the fact that... food still... you know... goes into your mouth
@@josephdu1952 yes but pig shellfish fish without scales are never called food in scripture or among the Jews.
Paul is my favourite apostle even with the hate he gets
Don't use some hypocrite actor when mention Jesus please
Signs and wonders does not mean someone is of God.
Deuteronomy 13:1-3
“If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or the wonder comes true, concerning which he spoke to you, saying, ‘Let us walk after other gods (whom you have not known) and let us serve them,’ you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams; for Yahweh your God is testing you to find out if you love Yahweh your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
Paul leads people to commit sin by rejecting God's Law. All of you people will go to Hell according to Jesus if you don't repent.
Matthew 7:21-23 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, in Your name did we not prophesy, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name do many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.’
Matthew 7:22 is talking about you. Lol it literally says right before that that nobody will get into the Kingdom of Heaven without doing the “will of the Father.” The will of the Father is not us obeying the law and commandments, it’s believing in the Son of God. See John 6:39-40😊
@@jacksonrelaxin3425 you're a fool. You can't even explain what "believing in the son of God" means you heathen. It's not some mental asent. Belief and works go hand and hand. Keep God's commandments like Jesus said.
Matthew 19:16-17
The Rich Young Ruler
And someone came to Him and said, “Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may obtain eternal life?” And He said to him, “Why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.”
Anything else you or anyone else says is irrelevant.
@@MinisterRedPill the entire reason Jesus came is to confront the Pharisees who thought their works made them righteous just like your dumbass does. Last I heard our righteousness is as filthy rags (Isaiah 64)
@@jacksonrelaxin3425 you sound like a typical queen James virus protestant flagget
@@MinisterRedPill oh no looks like you broke a commandment. Off to hell you go! Better repent before it’s too late buddy!
When I lived as though I was a Jew I could not help but see the so-called difference between Jesus and Paul but now that I live in the new more Glorious covenant of Spiritual truths I see no difference. Praise God for sending His Son to accomplish what no one else could accomplish and for awakening spiritual sight to Apostle Paul.
Glory be to God!
you see no difference ok Jesus said i come not to abolish the law, the law stated not to eat meat sacrificed to idols or blood or strangled, Paul taught eat what you want up to you, who was right the Messiah or Paul who was just a man, they can't both be right.
@@ryan62011 Let's finish what Jesus said... He said that He came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it! What does that mean? Well, connecting what Jesus said elsewhere, it appears to me that He means He was bringing it (the law) to it's fullest understanding! How easy is it to fulfill the law? He (Jesus) explains this in Matthew 22:36-40, where He says:
King James Version
36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
So, as He states here: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
We can easily fulfill the qualifications of the law by simply following those two commandments right there! I didn't say it, Jesus did!
@@ryan62011 this is not a particularly traditional doctrine per se... but the whole abolish the law / complete the law thing comes down to the "Covenants" God made in the Bible.
There are (at least) 5 obvious cases of God creating a Covenant in the scripture. (note here, a covenant is not a contract, good example is a will, unilateral, one party has all the power, and dictate the will, the other side can only decide to participate or not)
1 - the covenant with Noah (never destroy the world with flood again, rainbow... etc...)
2 - the covenant with Abraham/Isacc/Jacob (all nations shall be blessed through you, your descendants will be like the sands on the beach/stars in the sky...)
3 - the covenant with Moses/the Israelite people (6 tribes on each side of the mountain - "if you obey these law... good things happens... if you don't... bad things happens")
4 - the covenant with David (your descendants will forever sits on the thrown...)
5 - the covenant of Jesus (this is my blood, the new covenant)
When we say "Old Testament" and "New Testament", we are really just referring to the covenant of Moses and Jesus.
The unique thing here is that, if you go back and read carefully, 4 out of the 5 covenants are unconditional => God is saying "I will...." (very beautiful)
Which is the one with conditions? That's right, the one through the Laws of Moses. If you obey => these things happens; if you rebel => those things happens (and the list of over 200 laws/rules to follow)
Now, we know from what happens in Kings and the Chronicles the people did not obey the covenants... so Jesus is here (the "New Covenant") the complete it, to complete what the people (in extension, humanity) cannot uphold (obeying the law).
And that is why Jesus can say "not a single stroke of the Law will be abolished", because he alone, will complete it. And this is also why Paul can say, "we are not under the laws of Moses", because God's people has shown, we cannot do it, only Jesus, our Savior, he alone can complete the Law.
^ that is exactly the reason why you will see the covenant of Moses is the only one with conditions, God already (in his infinite wisdom), have the "backup" plan ready.
*I did not came up or discovered any of this, merely read it from David Pawson's book on the covenants from the Bible, you can take a look if you are interested*
You should do another Video and call it " Is Paul's Gospel at Odds with Jesus' Teaching?
Jesus said that salvation was only for the Jews.
Mt.15:24;
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Mt.10:5,6;
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles,
and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Jn.4:22
Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
Yes Paul did Hijack Christianity and his Gullible Followers who worship Paul........Paul.s Jesus did not exist...
1. Correct, Paul hijacked The Way. 2. Peter was appointed to preach to the Gentiles. 3. The Jews are only 2 of the 12 tribes of Israel. You don't know if you are part of one of the tribes. You very well can be. Their identity is lost.
Israel only was being offered the kingdom until after the stoning of Stephen in the end of acts 7 Paul was converted acts 9 and God revealed several messages that were kept secret since the beginning of the world!! one is the body of Christ where now after Paul there is no difference but before Paul there was a difference
Matthew10:5-6
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Romans15:8
Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
James1:1
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
Ephesians 2:11-14
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;
@@wolfwatchers
These twelve and Jesus did not exist.
@@lutkedog1 cool story bro !! so basically, you're an unsaved devil just like the owner of this channel! but you admit it !!
You deserve way more subs.
Hey man I think your video is biased. I could tell within the first sentence.
Also, you're position is wrong
Wow, your bias detector is strong. Just like your style of argumentation.
St Paul received the Gospel's from Jesus Christ
The differences between Peter and Paul’s gospel message.
This isn't an exhaustive list but it should be enough to show the clear differences.
The first difference is one is called "The Gospel of the Kingdom.”
The other is called "The Gospel of Grace."
The kingdom was spoken about since the world began (Acts 3:21-25).
The dispensation of God’s grace was kept secret since the world began (Rom 16:25).
The gospel for the circumcised was given to Peter” ( Gal. 2:7)
The gospel for the uncircumcised was given to Paul.
The cross of Christ was not part of the message of the Kingdom (Luke 9:2 vs. Luke 18:34).
The Cross is the central message of the message of Grace (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).
The resurrection of Christ was not part of the message of the Kingdom (John 20:9).
The message of Grace without the resurrection is vain (1 Corinthians 15:14).
The kingdom requires performance and works (1 John 2:3; Matt 25:32-46).
God’s grace motivates a purpose in your heart (2 Cor 9:7; 2 Cor 5:14-15).
The kingdom will benefit everyone on earth (Rev 20:3-4; Isa 2:3-4).
God’s grace unto salvation benefits only those that believe (Rom 3:22).
Salvation in the Kingdom only comes in the future when the kingdom comes (Acts 3:19; Heb 9:28; 1 Pet 1:5).
Salvation by Grace comes at the moment of belief (Eph 1:13; Rom 5:1).
To be saved in the Kingdom requires enduring to the end (Matt 24:13).
To be saved by Grace requires believing your work has come to an end (Rom 4:5).
There is a difference between Jew and Gentile in the kingdom (Matt 15:26; Zech 8:23). There are no Jews or Gentiles in the church in this dispensation of grace (Gal 3:28).
The Kingdom message was given to the Twelve apostles of Israel to preach (Acts 1:3). The gospel of Grace was given to the apostle of the Gentiles to preach (Rom 11:13; 1 Cor 9:17; Eph 3:1-2).
Those who believe the Kingdom message are waiting for a kingdom of heaven to come to earth (Matt 6:10).
The gospel of Grace tells us on earth to trust Christ and go to heaven (Eph 2:6-7).
The kingdom will be a visible presence on earth (Matt 24:27; Rev 19:11).
God’s grace is by faith and not by sight (2 Cor 5:7).
Healing of the sick was a sign of the kingdom (Matt 4:23; Mark 16:18).
The lack of healing is a sign of God’s sufficient grace (2 Cor 12:8-10).
Water baptism prepares Israel to enter the kingdom (Matt 3:3; Acts 2:38)
Baptism by the Spirit places us in the Body of Christ (1 Cor 12:13).
Continued obedience to the commandments required in the Kingdom (Matt 23:13).
Under Grace, we are justified without the law of Moses and not under the law (Acts 13:39; Rom 6:14).
Under the Kingdom, program faith without works is dead (James 2:24).
Under Grace, faith in the finished work of Christ giving us peace and life (Rom 4:5; Rom 5:1).
Under the Kingdom program, you can fall away and lose the Spirit and be lost forever
(Hebrews 6:6).
Under Grace we are sealed by the Spirit to the day of redemption (Ephesians 4:30).
Wow some of these arent even contradictions, like the the kingdom was spoken about before the world began vs the dispensation of Gods grace was kept secret before the world began.
And it seems like you didn't even read the passages being cited. Did you just copy and paste from another website?
For one thing Peter focused on his people around them while Paul had a much wider audience and dealt heavily with gentiles. If anything it's more complimentary than anything else.
This sort of hyper dispensationalism is dangerous.
Gal 1:6-9
6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the *grace* of Christ unto *another gospel:*
7 *Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.*
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
Grace was not a secret in old testament every animal sacrifice was a picture of grace pointing to Jesus God even saying He wanted repentance not sacrifices. Law grace go together
@@--i-am-root 1 Corinthians 15:1-4
I personally believe he taught the word, but I also believe that he was a liar Romans 3:7 and a misogynist.
This you mean Romans 3:7?
7 Someone might argue, “If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?” 8 Why not say-as some slanderously claim that we say-“Let us do evil that good may result”? Their condemnation is just!
@@YouSeeTheProof yes that is the one he should have said "I am not a liar". and moved on.