- 26
- 216 936
Viesturs
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 4 ธ.ค. 2009
GitHub: github.com/viesturz?tab=repositories
Tapcahanger vs Stealthchanger
Initial testing between Tapchanger & Stealthchanger.
Tapchanger: github.com/viesturz/tapchanger
Stealthchanger: github.com/DraftShift/StealthChanger
Tapchanger: github.com/viesturz/tapchanger
Stealthchanger: github.com/DraftShift/StealthChanger
มุมมอง: 2 420
วีดีโอ
Tapchanger vs Stealthchanger - which one works best and what can be improved. Testing starts now.
มุมมอง 1.6K21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
Tapchanger vs Stealthchanger - which one works best and what can be improved. Testing starts now.
We are Printing
มุมมอง 1.3K21 วันที่ผ่านมา
Some multicolor printing time, this does do multicolor. Going to make some calibration cubes next. github.com/viesturz/tapchanger
Liftbar walktrough
มุมมอง 10Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Long rant on liftbar develeopment. All the files are now up in github.com/viesturz/tapchanger Still really busy with work, so will not hang out in Discord for a while. Let me know if the comments if you are building this.
Liftbar preview
มุมมอง 10Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Sneak preview of Liftbar, more details coming soon. Details in liftbar branch, github.com/viesturz/tapchanger/tree/liftbar
Liftbar prototype
มุมมอง 3.3K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
Voron 0 Roto: github.com/viesturz/VoronMisc/tree/main/0.2 + Roto Liftbar prototype: github.com/viesturz/tapchanger/tree/main/Dock/[dev] Liftbar Nozzle align: github.com/viesturz/NozzleAlign
Tapcahnger dock alignment
มุมมอง 2.7K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
Another weekend working on quality of life. This time on docking location adjustment. Tapchanger - github.com/viesturz/tapchanger Klipper extensions - github.com/viesturz/klipper-toolchanger Misc voron tweaks - github.com/viesturz/VoronMisc
Tapchanger Shuttle Assembly
มุมมอง 1.9K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
Putting together the other part - the shuttle. A very simple build, made tricky by the good old fan corner interferance. github.com/viesturz/tapchanger
Tpachanger + Dragon Burner hotend Assembly
มุมมอง 8K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
This is a long one. I'm assembling a full hotend from zero. Let me know in the comments if this format is useful and any improvements for the next one. Tapchanger: github.com/viesturz/tapchanger Dragon Burner Toolhead: github.com/chirpy2605/voron/tree/main/V0/Dragon_Burner Toolboard mounts: github.com/KayosMaker/CANboard_Mounts
Dock update
มุมมอง 1.7K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
Addressing issue with the Tapchanger magnetic dock. github.com/viesturz/tapchanger
Quality of life
มุมมอง 5K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
Nozzle alignment probe: github.com/viesturz/NozzleAlign/blob/main/BallProbe.md Nozze wipe: github.com/viesturz/VoronMisc/tree/main/WipePlate Tapckanger dock STLs updated to use nozzle pads, instructions coming soon. Nozzle pad molds: github.com/viesturz/tapchanger/tree/main/STL/Tools
Tapchanger vs Voron Tap
มุมมอง 12K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
Testing if the bearings in tapchanger can stand up to linear rail in Voron Tap. github.com/viesturz/TapChanger-lite
Voron going fast ... vertically
มุมมอง 36K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
Solved my vertical speed problem. Stealthchop starts skipping steps at 40 for some reason. Spread spectrum 48v goes up to 300 with no sweat. Tool mount: github.com/viesturz/TapChanger-lite Wiring harness: github.com/viesturz/Voron2Toolbox
My problem is that you are a one man show and not willing to let others help easily. PR's sit forever, and you give very little to no support in discord. The same questions get asked every day (and the comments here I see). I think you have seen how far Stealthchanger has come in such a short time and gotten upset.
Yes I have very limited time to work on this. If you are interested in co-owning/ forking the repo please go ahead. My initial idea was to move to stealthchanger if it is good enough. But we are not there yet. Alternatively, maybe import tapchnanger as an alternative shuttle in stealthchanger repo.
oh wait you need to glue in the rods? has anyone had issues with that before?
Really depends on the print tolerances. I do glue mine. Theoretically the forces are all perpendicular to the contect surfaces and glue is not adding much in terms of stiffness.
There can a huge variance in magnet strength (especially aliexpress one) even from the same batch. Tapchanger has 2 magnet contact points vs Stealthchangers 3 magnets. (2 of which are against screws which should also cause a bit less attraction) Therefore I would expect Tapchangers force needed to at least 2/3 of Stealtchangers one but not more than double as you meassured. Are the tapchangers magnets are flush against each other?
12:04 I can see there is a lot of ghosting on these test print. Are those because of the tool changer mechanisms? What I want to ask is that, if I build a toolchanger capable voron is that going be a worst single color printer then a voron without a toolchanger?
Yes it will, by nature, be worse The stiffer the toolhead, the better the graphs. However I don’t really know how much worse and if its negligible or not. What I know is that printing at 10k is likely to give you ringing on a stock machine as well
is there a stealthburner version?
Will tap work with both ?
Yes, however see the stickyness issue with Stealthchanger.
Input shaper comparison would be really nice to see
Great idea, doing that.
Could the probing inconsistencies be mitigated with somehow reducing the pressure required? You said 2 magnets was not sufficient to hold down the Stealthchanger tool on the shuttle, but what if you tried thinner magnets? The force required to probe should be reduced, but will it hold well enough to be stable? If it is secure enough, you could play with the magnet depth in the current holes to test probing force vs stability of the toolhead. I really want to build a toolchanger, but I can't decide which way to go. Bearings vs pins. Seems both work well enough, each with its own challenges.
Is the default tapchanger plates, bars or rods? I’ve got rods made, but not installed.
I recommend square rods. Round rods have a bit more flex. Plates is really a legacy thing.
I like tapchaner, bearings seem better. Beacon instead of tapping
I personally went with Stealthchanger because I prefer the simplicity
Will u be making one for switchwire?
OMG, cannot begint to think how this could work on switchwire. There is no Y movement. Unless you want to attach docks on the bed. Very unlikely. Maybe someone comes up with a way.
my fit for stealthchanger was quite stiff at first too, i used a drill bit to clean out the inner of the bushing, after that it was smoothly engeaging
Great work as always! We’re aware that some users have had issues with probe tapping. It’s something we are trying to fix for our next version down the line. We’re very open to input and suggestions from you regarding improvements
Perhaps don't assume people know what the heck these products are. Just a sentence in the description goes a long way.
Lmao
i just realized something, the difference between Newton and I is that when Newton had a question he analyzed it and worked on it, i had the same question (tap changer vs stealthchanger) but never worked on it, thank you for doing this and definitely will be following these testings. ( btw if you will publish your finding is it going to be only here or other platforms as well ? ).
Most hyped I've been in a while
glad i just got so much ABS filament in, just in case i can reprint it all ^^
Interesting! Would like to see Input Shaping graphs compared as well, if possible.
Good question! Both systems have there pros and cons. I would prefer the most accurate, durable and easy to maintain system. Thank you for your work on it!!!
Uh.. what is this now? What printer is that for?
Just a test rig 😊. Not a crazy tool change idex combo.
I'm very excited for the testing! I'm most interested in the rigidity of the toolchangers and their respective weights.
ME TOO!
Me too. I'm waiting
Me too .... 😅
Typo in title, otherwise thanks for sharing!
Kudos to the eagle-eyed, fixed.
a big thank you. thanks to you i was able to adapt your awesome tap changer lite and the idea of the liftbar to my metal BLV MGN Cube Core XY. i jsut made my first dock/undock tonight and i'm super happy. th-cam.com/video/F6gTkpMWvvs/w-d-xo.html
Amazing work
Looking awesome! Hows the liftbar treating you? Any issues or fails from added complexity?
THIS IS AWESOME!
what extruder are you using? is it like a sherpa mini with LGX/HGX gears?
HGX mod for dragon. Essentially combining several parts into one at the cost of slightly more complex assembly. It's in the tapchanger repo under tapchnager/toolheads/dragon/HGX
Thanks for these videos! This is just awesome!
Have you tried Nudge?
No, what's that?
Nozzle probe that works in 3-4 directions if i remember correctly
@@viesturz zruncho's multi nozzle alignment tool. It's super easy and cheap to build.
i feel like having a liftbar disables the option of just having a 6x6 grid of toolheads :P
I'm not sure if I want to see that for lols or not : 😂 Powering all of that would be a nightmare.
@@viesturz spaghetti monster
If I may ask, what is that extruder? It has the parts of the HGX lite correct? would the HGX light extruder also work (in aluminium), or is there a reason you are using this printed version?
Well this answered itself just now, you have uploaded the STLs just now. Thank you
Fantastic machine. Looks and acts a lot better than prusa xl. Way to go!
What printer is this
Hello, I would like to know if multi-color printing can now print perfectly? Still in the process of adjustment, I really like this project
Looks great. Whats the repeatability tolerance?
Can you upload a video with a sample of a print with all those print heads?I am intreasted to build a similar project 😅
Amazing, thanks a lot! Cant wait for this to be a standard thing you just do to your printer and klipper ships with the software from the getgo. Its IMO the biggest thing that holds 3d printing back, automatic material and color change.
6:45 you could try mounting a deflecting plate/bar underneath the inactive toolheads so that the cables do not catch on them while using the full Y-travel
What are the advantages of the lift bar
how much i will buy everything from you
Not sure I understand. Why cant your 2.4 just lift the gantry to pick up a tool instead of adding another half of printer to do the same task
Because I can 😅.
"Something i cant hack shortly (klipper syncronisation)" what you can do ist Wait for the Printhead has done moving, get the "Printer Time" add a second and start boot "Motors" at this Time with the speed you need. (if you like i can figure out the python Methods you have to call)
Hopefully during tool changes the bearing block doesn't get messed up
Why use belts instead of lead screws for the lift?
Lead screws is def an option. To be fair I have some sitting around I could use. Just this is working well enough and looks nice with 2.4 asthetic. I will make a lead screws build if the belts/gearboxes ever fail.
modifying a Galileo 2 Z drive might might save some space
Amazing work. What door hinge are you using for the front doors?
What kind of constraints are you working within? Could you breakout through the back and add some counterweights? Then it should be possible to fall back to one motor.
Trying to fit in a normal Voron frame. Counterweights might be an option, just don't like them.
Neither do I, but it is a way to balance everything, although the stepper will have to accelerate twice the mass. So, may not work out anyways.