Euro NCAP Crash Test of Jeep Wrangler 2018
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ธ.ค. 2018
- Euro NCAP performs a series of crash tests on each model tested:
- a frontal impact test, the car impacts a rigid barrier
- an offset frontal impact test, 40% of the width of the car is striking a deformable barrier
- a pole test, the tested car is propelled sideways into a rigid pole
- a side impact test, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door
A series of pedestrian tests are conducted with different impactors, adult and child head form, lower and upper leg form and whiplash tests are performed on a sled.
Active safety is tested based on the car’s equipment: autonomous emergency braking systems (car to car, with a pedestrian and a cyclist target), lane support and speed assist technologies and seatbelt reminders.
All details on the Euro NCAP Website: www.euroncap.com/en/results/J... - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
Good car for my mother in law.
Yuan Tronz 😂😂😂😂💩💩😂💩
😂😂
You're mean 😁
🤣🤣🤣🤣 the fuck..?!!!!!!
Chilll 😂😂😂
YOOO CHILLLL 😂😂😂😂 don’t gotta do her like that
and people said Jimny 3 stars were bad ...
Yea man this is true
We need to focus on the difference of size between two cars. Jeep is only one star for the big size, but Jimny has three stars even though it's much smaller than Jeep. That's enough performance.
Exactly !
@@Ajay-nj4vx haha another hater spotted 😂😂
@@AlexandruCristianB , I know to
Anybody who accuses Euro NCAP of bias, keep in mind that the Jeep Renegade was given a five star safety rating by the same organization.
That makes since. The renegade is based off the Fiat 500 platform.
@@kain383 They did give the Grand Cherokee 4 stars at one point.
they are corrupt to the core.
@@lordnetsplits3192 hooww?? Becuase they actually test shit? And most American cars are shit holes that are unsafe?
@@gabrielgomez2483 The Chevy Cruze was the only car to this day to get full marks for the frontal offset test, dig it at Euroncap, every part of the body is green... Cars which did far worse got awards in the year they were tested (2009) no one talked about the Cruze. I still can't find another car which scored full marks on the offset test...
Chevrolet actually said this in a press meeting a while ago, (Only car since Euroncap stated to get full marks in the frontal test) and Euroncap said nothing about it.
According to the test report...
"In the frontal offset test, the connection between the A-pillar and the trans-facia beam was damaged in a way that indicated the structure
would be unable to withstand higher loads. Similarly, deformation of the footwell showed that the structure had reached the limit of its
integrity. Although dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger dummy, structures in
the dashboard were thought to present a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions, and protection of this
body area was rated as marginal. Dummy readings, together with the penalty applied for the unstable bodyshell, resulted in protection of
the driver chest being rated as weak. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings of chest compression showed marginal protection
of the driver chest. For the rear passenger, dummy readings showed weak protection of the neck and, combined with high shoulder-belt
loads, poor protection of the chest. In the side barrier test, the Wrangler scored maximum points, with good protection of all critical body
areas. No pole test was conducted on the Wrangler. Tests on the front seats and head restraints indicated good protection against
whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.
The Wrangler is not equipped with an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system."
E
its incredible to see how far safety has come because if you compare this 1 star the wrangler was awarded with a car that was awarded 20 years ago, this car looks so much safer
I think its still quite safe, the only issues are the missing electronic safety features and the fact that it easy to flip if the front wheel crashes
As you can see there th-cam.com/video/zNHsE1wpqb4/w-d-xo.html
@@Bigsmoke-so9vo Here in the US we aren't all that concerned about the well being of non-occupants as much as we are about how well a vehicle stands up in large animal collisions. This is different than the Euro point of view that is built into the testing criteria. The Wrangler will do a good amount of damage to pedestrians, cyclists and smaller vehicles and this, combined with the lack of electronic nanny features, hurts the Euro safety rating.
@@rich7447 i know
@@rich7447agreed. I can avoid people. A deer totaled my car.
Suddenly all Americans turned into crash test experts
Abhishek Pawar we have always been crash test experts.... we have NASCAR
americans made Eurocraptest redundant since they make tests with 25 % overall width wher e germcrap isn't protected
Jeep is SHIT
Abhishek Pawar Fuck Off moron
Sergio Oliveira Melo your mom is Shit
Being designed for off-road use isn't an excuse - because the majority of its time will be on a road.
Wow that was really stupid of you to say that. They should design jets for how well they perform on the ground, since they lay stationary on airfields most of the time.
@@abramar123 Lol. An off-road car can be safe too.
@@abramar123, that's abundantly ridiculous. If the jet collapsed from being stationary for longer than an hour on the airfields, it'd absolutely be OK to call that out as unacceptable. "But it does fine with flying" would not forgive the failure of it being incapable of sitting on the ground, then.
It's got great safety for on-road use. Stiff body structure, airbags, ABS, traction control, nothing more is needed. Euroncap are morons.
@@abramar123 - OMG
1:22 rip kevin
And people said that Duster's 3 stars is a bad result
Who's here after the 4 star rating of Mahindra Thar? 😂
Me 😂😂😂
This is much much tougher than Gncap, pedestrian testing, driver assistance, etc...
Mee
:D
@@akj2387 bro then also Thar will Score 3 stars and if GNCAP Test Jeep Wrangler then it will score 3 or 2 stars
Still the most versatile and capable 4x4 in the market. It retains solid front axle, the fenders can be easily detached for more flex, doors are easily detachable and the windscreen folds like every old Jeep. People buy motorcycles for the same price as a rubicon jeep yet those are literal death trap.
What? No~that can't be right 🤣 They look so tough with chrome rims, bull bar and lift kit at the shopping mall car park😂😂😂
Just try to see my description and then you will get your answer!
Actually the ones with the aftermarket bumpers and stuff, they'll probably do a lot more damage to another vehicle. They're anchored to the frame and will transfer a lot of shock into the frame and jolt the shit out of the occupants, but those bars are designed to NOT bend which is a bad thing for another car lol. Bad for everyone really... in fact, it's bad for your health AND your eyes, let's make it illegal. :D
No curtain airbags? At least they could have put some padding on the side where poor jimmy hits his head in the rear.
Jeep doesn't seem to care about the back passengers.
They were useless anyway
Correction.. Jeep only cares for their profit margins fuck the customer…
....Welp :,) * Remembers this video every time i drive mine for the rest of forever *
You should really sell it
And buy mahindra thar
Usually body-on-ladder cars have weaker cabin but stronger chassis because main emphasis is given only on chassis & not the cabin for such vehicles.
Congrats!
No video footage from under? I noticed portion of the floor was made of thick glass.
1:22 oooooooooffffff
Those who think that their 5 stars small car are safer than this, simply they cannot understand.
The only real measurement is the IIHS death rate, for passive and active safety, which will be available, for this car, many years after.
The NCAP stars are just an indication, not an absolute measurement of safety.
That is why older cars, without any airbag, may have a lower death rate from a nowadays car
with 100 airbags +.
F. ex., a Passat b3, (1992), without airbags at all, has a lower IIHS death rate, (24), than a 2014 Passat B6, (42).
The Safety Rating Advisory Committee, ( SARAC), says:
" Examination of the relationship between overall EuroNCAP test score and injury outcome on an individual vehicle basis adds a further dimension to the interpretation of the relationship.
They show that whilst there is an association between average crash-worthiness and EuroNCAP score outcome, there is significant variation in the measures of injury outcome in real crashes for specific vehicles within each EuroNCAP score category. It shows that a vehicle with good average real world crash outcomes does not always perform well in EuroNCAP testing and vice versa. This observation is consistent across the results for all countries considered in the study.
Comparison of average crash worthiness ratings based on frontal impact crashes within EuroNCAP offset frontal impact star rating categories showed no trends. The results suggest there is little if any association between the results of the EuroNCAP offset frontal impact test and the real world injury outcomes to drivers in frontal crashes".
The Syncro Heresy
Go IIHS I want to work there
And they realy need to test this thing
The only measurement which counts really is the "death rate", (IIHS).
But there must be a lot of time, (years), to have it. That is why the manufacturers cannot include it into their marketing and, in reality, afraid of it.
And as SARAC says, the real life safety has, almost, nothing to do with EuroNcap tests, or even, IIHS tests, on walls and barriers.
Cool
How did it rate in the NHTSA ("US NCAP")?
Marginal on small overlap, good on moderate overlap, side, roof and restraints (IIHS ratings). What hurts it in Europe is that they have a category for non-occupant injuries (WTF) and they consider electronic systems that bitch at you or take control of your vehicle to be a good thing.
They are even considering making it mandatory that vehicles be able to read road signs and complain if the driver is speeding.
Why no pole test??
I know it got a 1 star and all, but I was surprised to see how little damage it took from the full width crash.
abdullah ramzan eh it looks like its not damaged that much but that's not a good thing, 1 those doors and windows will never for right again and 2 all the energy from the impact is transferred into the cabin and subsequently into the passengers, the more fucked up the car looks in these tests usually the better, you want crumple zones to absorb the energy.
@@alexfraley of course the doors and windows will not fit right again, the vehicle is going to be totaled. 2nd, the front end is a crumple zone, and of course energy will be transferred to the cabin, but you don't want the cabin area to be a crumple zone. Majority of the energy will be transferred through the frame, and trans. There are multiple break and impact absorbing zones withing the frame, trans, and front end.
@@alexfraley but in the case of this jeep, most of the deadly crashes of the occupants are rollovers, which it is substantially better than most cars
@@greynolds17 Lol this car is far more likely than most to roll over in the first place, that is not a good thing.
just a rolcage in it and prob solved (if you put seatbelts on) @@greynolds17
Why didn't they test the AEB system? It's available on the new Wrangler.
@Naz Mo no the one from the 80's 😒
This car got only 1 star because it did bad to reduce the G forces on the passengers.
Also because "In the frontal offset test, the connection between the A-pillar and the trans-facia beam was damaged in a way that indicated the structure would be unable to withstand higher loads. Similarly, deformation of the footwell showed that the structure had reached the limit of its integrity."
So why not test it at higher loads? That's a bit of speculation, honestly.
@@rumblebeast08 Trust the educated people who perform the tests, rather than your uninformed "common sense, innit" brain. What you think doesn't matter.
@@Malc180s Bro, I have a MSME and work as a Powertrain engineer. I'm far more educated in automotive tech than 99.99% of the planet and definitely more than TH-cam comment sections. Almost all of these certification groups have an agenda and it usually is about $$$$.
@@rumblebeast08 Total bollocks.
Where is the pole test
beats dying in a rav 4🤷♂️
2019 RAV4 has 5 stars
Doesn't beat not-dying in a RAV4...
yeah, imagine ur ghost getting seen for ever in it.
Dying in a fiat? Pass
nice👍
No more Constance song?
Its so high off the ground the front stucture doesn't contact the barrier.
When a good game with good graphics and gameplay use a bad physics engine.
And some people complain about the Dacia Duster
I still would better be sitting in this Jeep during the crash with Euro Ncap 5-star 3-times ligher new Toyota Yaris or even as someone said 2 Times lighter 3-star Dacia duster :) Unfortunately Euro Ncap don't show you real safety during crash with other car
Tolek Cacek Check out the 5th gear clip of a Landrover Discovery chrashing into a Renault Espace.
@@franktechmaniac7488 I did and i know but espace is quite same size like discovery . If they put 5 star clio instead espace result will be different cheers
@@tolekcacek9919 F250 vs Focus video
th-cam.com/video/A9rNLnRczZg/w-d-xo.html
@@rich7447 Yep it is what i said
Why doesn't this vehicle have rear airbags for side impact?
First Last Wranglers have never had rear airbags
i think the 1 star was mostly due to the lack of active safety tech and poor pedestrian safety. i think the overall crash occupant safety is fine.
Joel BIelecki it can be optioned with AEB and BSM, it didn’t have an effect on the score. It just didn’t perform well to earn more than one star
Single star for such a Solid built modern vehicle like Jeep wrangler ? Real life accident protection is a different perspective than these crash tests
Sounds like you bought a jeep and are disappointed
Nah i bought a Jeep Wrangler and im happy with it. My next one is gonna be a Gladiator :). U can say w/e u want to say about these tests but i feel safer in my Jeep than my Lexus GX460 :)
It had little protection of some parts of the body, and the structure of the cabin was at the limit beginning to disintegrate. Also there are no assistance systems available
cdn.euroncap.com/media/51326/euroncap-2018-jeep-wrangler-datasheet.pdf
@@TranMrTuan We have a GX460 and have an order in on a Wrangler 4xe. I would trust either in a collision, but if I am being honest I would take my Ram 2500 over both of them. The crumple zones on the Ram are built into other vehicles.
O problema é que esse é um carro off road, ele é alto demais (a suspensão é para passar por cima de rochas, areia, e tudo o que vier pela frente...), ele é um carro desmontável (nele é possível tirar portas, teto, parabrisa... Tudo!)
Uma pessoa que compra um carro desse, não está dando atenção para segurança, porque não é um carro para rua, é off road. O que essa pessoa mais teme é cair do penhasco! hahah
The problem is that this is a car off road, it is too high (the suspension is to go over rocks, sand, and everything that comes in front ...), it is a collapsible car (in it it is possible to take doors, ceiling, windshield ... Everything!)
A person who buys a car from that, is not paying attention to safety, because it is not a car to the street, it is off road. What he fears most is falling off the cliff! hahah
indeed 1 star... but i afraid any other 5 star car has the unlucky moment to crash against this beast!
(which i like it anyway.)
Where is the pole test?
They don't do it for cars without curtain airbags
@@TheAleFradi It has a side airbag designed to protect the head. A pole test can be done even if the car doesn't have curtain airbags. I don't know why Euro NCAP didn't do It.
@@agustinmarchetti529 Because it has a colapsable roof that would not protect passengers and it would collapse. The dummies would be destroyed and it's cheaper not to do it because of the roof. The dummies are £100k each.
Agustin Marchetti if the car does so bad in the side crash test they don’t qualify for the pole test, like the 2010 Kia Cerato.
The dummies are more around 1M each. The reason they don't do it is because the head would contact the pole going over what they call a "capping limit" and therefore scoring 0 points in the test anyway.
How about make a head-on crash between a G wagon and Jeep. I think that will be more clear
C N If your car comes out well and you are dead, you can be proud of having had a strong car. www.euroncap.com/de/results/mercedes-benz/g-class/34835
I think the real life safety tests are very variable and relative. We own jeep wrangler and we unfortunately involved in some major accidents, surprisingly enough after the accident we drove the car home with minor scratches while the other cars were crumbled like coke cans. Jeep wrangler is safe car
Wow Mahindra Thar Scored 4 stars in Global NCAP today.. And this expensive trash here.. 🤦🏻♂️
This is not trash bro 🙏. Even thar also scores 1 star if they tested in EuroNCAP as thar lacks side airbags.
@@lakshmanganesh5086 This is a $40k + vehicle. It's trash.
Omg its dave mustaine!!!! 🎸
Now jeep , punto , previous. Whats going on bw FCA and ncap.
and then they said the jimny was insecure 😒
1 Star? I'd still... HIT it. ;D
seems to take the impact quite well ???
Yes, the car body is strong but the inpact forces transfer to the bodies of the passengers.
Почему одна заезда? Тут минимум 3 !
Rigid Barrier test shows bad energy absorption for the Jeep, it's not well thought out.
Damnnnn
Meiner Ansicht nach sollte bei Cabrios immer ein Überschlagtest gemacht werden
The all-new 2019 Jeep Wrangler: For when you absolutely fuckin' hate your kids.
The slap to the face lol
Wtf the fuck was that real quick
00:28
Bu yıldızları neye göre veriyorlar anlamadım bir türlü..neden 1 yıldız almış şimdi bu
Jesus there is practically NO give in the structure. You may as well just throw the person directly at the dang wall.
It would be a 5 star if you slap on some 40s and some tons and maybe a roll cage
The Wrangler comes standard with a roll cage.
Me with this car: 😃😃
Actually was very impressed with the "Crash Tests", the other gimmics that aren't available for people who shouldn't be driving should not be included in the title "crash test". They don't mention here that most of the negatives came from not having, emergency braking for dummies, lane drift warning and full Stability Control System you know for drivers who don't pay attention or are always on their cell phones.
Read the report. It's not just the pedestrian safety and assists(I do agree that they should be heavily weighted), but the car failed to provide good protection for the occupants as well.
They say it's unsafe but I don't think so, Jeep's are known for the strong body.
Cerrystyle strong body means the energy travels directly to the passengers.
I feel like getting a new car…
When you have a design that hasn’t changed all that much since the 70’s you aren’t going to get good crash test reports.
this is possibly the only convertible tested since they updated their test suite in 2015, there are plenty of European rag tops to test - mini cooper - vm beetle - bmw series 4 but they skip over these for almost decade including the land rover defender which was built until just recently and closer to jeep in design , difficult to put head air bags etc in these but doesn't really matter cause there are also odds at play with these scores, they gave the tiny little smart car "two-by" 5 stars ... but stars only count if it hits another "two-by" sized car so i'd put my $ on the wrangler , no one is ever safe in a crash until the cab squirts full of jello on impact.
I want the jello
Why 1star?
wondering the same. I think it's the lack of side airbags probably because the truck looks nowhere near as damaged and deformed as others with better ratings
I would really like to see who is supporting euroncap with money ... and i would rather be in this 1 star Jeep in case of an accident than a five star polo or golf...
The crash test itself appears to be better than the 1 star rating would indicate. It seems to me that it would be the most informative to not combine factors such as the lack of crash avoidance systems and pedestrian safety into the actual crash survivability rating. The passenger cell appears to maintain it shape pretty well, especially for a vehicle with a removable roof. The heads didn't contact the windshield. Yes, it's a rigid body on frame, live axle, four wheel drive utility vehicle, which you wouldn't expect to absorb energy as well as modern unibody passenger car of the approximately the same size. But 1 star? That seems unreasonable.
I agreed with you think europeans hate a little América lol
@@johnmcclane8512 No, we don't. But lack of side airbags for rear passengers (where kids usually are seated) makes Jeep a weak competitor in the SUV market. That's the main reason I do not consider it as an option, otherwise it's exactly what I'm looking for.
@@baginatoraI never sit in the back and I don’t have kids. I don’t worry about it
I bet this car would of failed in a side pole crash test.
These tests are based on the worst case. so ok not that high off a score, but 12 years at the fire and rescue services I've seen tons of accidents so the first thing that you have to think about, is that you very rarely hit a static object this size, meaning that the kinetic energy has no where else to go as in the car. In 80% of the cases we have car on car accidents and cars having the bigger mass always deccelareted much slower than light cars accelerate away. Just imaging being in a Mini and hit by a Wrangler where do you think most of the energy will go... Or a car hiting a 12t Truck even the car having a 5 star rating. My experience tells me that I would rather be sitting in the truck. If I remember correctly, ther were only two cars (an we have an average of 1.6 crashes we're called to in a week) i've seen hitting a Wall this way. On both occasions it was intentionally (suicide attempt) 1 of them being a LR Defender with the occupant suffering only minor bruses... Btw even hitting a three that way tends to extremly deform a car because the energy is concentraded in one point and a deformed car means in this case absorbed energy that doesn't reach the occupants. But yes they are Not cheating at NCAP but the worst case scenario doesn't always reflects the reality (momentum, kinetic energy, an all the other laws of physics) they don't care of stars or test ratings an this is not only thrue for this topic.
Enoug said, have a nice day an stay safe folks !
Ps. Please don't mind if some phrases sound false or weird I'm not a native English speaker ;-)
th-cam.com/video/SbRNAYeTEWU/w-d-xo.html
Who's here after the jeep tiped over in the iihs test?
freedom death mobile
2012 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER 5 STAR
In my modest opinion, all cars with body-on-frame layout will get poor crash results
not landcruiser 200! the only exception
Hilux got 3 out of 5 stars, and 5 out of 5 stars with Toyotas "safety pack" , so your opinion is mostly wrong.
@@JohnnyBoyCali Thank you for fact checking :)
SnowCat nahh check out the new mercedes G wagon
@@Nabilllllll It all depends what you are in a collision with. A G Wagon will do well against vehicles that weigh about the same or less than it does. If I hit it with my 8,000 lb (10,600 lb GVWR) pickup it is going to lose. Very few vehicles do well once the weight difference is larger than a ton.
It looks it was designed for the car to survive the crash rather than the driver
Yeah, damn right. Its build to survive everything. :)
th-cam.com/video/SbRNAYeTEWU/w-d-xo.html
Run it into an actual car, and it would be a different story. Body on frame designs do not have the same crumple zones to absorb impact, however it will put that energy into the vehicle it hits. With the extra weight of the vehicle, + the rigid frame, real life scenario is not represented in the test. It is rare to actually run into a stationary object that doesn't give. A semi-truck would fair poorly in this test as well, but if you were to crash, which vehicle do you want to be in?
l aint gonna bitch about this but l pray everyday l dont get hit by a wrangler with steel bumpers, that shit is like a train
Here in the US the Wrangler Unlimited (4 door) is a mid-size SUV. The majority of the vehicles on the road are going to be this size or larger. We have 4 vehicles and the Wrangler Unlimited is tied for the smallest vehicle with our Lexus GX 460. All 4 are body on frame.
Despite the 1 🌟 rating I'd still buy!!!
"I'd hit it" ;)
DRIVING CAUTIOUSLY OR IN PAIN...
Look id drive one if you paid me 5k,a day to use it... Otherwise what a heap of shit. 2018 and jeep is still taking consumers for a ride. 👏👏👏👏
Jeep Wrangler gets a 1 for not having all the "Crash Avoidance" technology, but it seems to keep the driver and front passenger safe 100% of the time, and when it gets T-Boned it kicks the other cars ass. I'd gladly buy a jeep wrangler after watching this, because all these new plastic tesla-style cars are going to get crunched.
Clorox Bleach not having crash avoidance gives you 3 stars provided you pass the rest of the test.
Clorox Bleach you better learn reading first. Jeep‘s frame is thin and weak. G wagon can crash your jeep into a tin can
@@BC-sr3gg ill trust a jeep more than an imported Honda, any time of the day.
Well, I would rather to be in that jeep instead my little car on a front collision.
What little car?
they just wasnt thinking about the kids that have to ride in the back seat
But after crash Its body looks intact.. where is the problem?
That right there is the problem
1 star ??? it was quite good i think
No, not when you're decelerating from 40mph to 0 in the distance of an inch with no safety assists other than a seatbelt reminder.
Yeah. I'm not seeing where the failures are. A-piler is fine, firewall/dash seem fine. Roof seems fine, no dislocation of 3 piece hard top.
@@MetaReplication if you crashed into another car going 40 I bet you would be much better off than those occupants... brick walls don't absorb energy
I think there is a good reason why you don't work for auto safety research
Jaroslav Klíma good question. You can read the report (pdf) on the website. Apparently the A-pillar was damaged and indicated it would not be able to take higher loads.
Kind of flawed rating its bad because no brake no active hood basicly if you hit a person with the car it does bad for that person.
Fiat doblo 2008 crash test
Jeep Wrangler is a walking coffin ⚰
Emre Güney they don’t walk though
It's only 1* because it doesn't have front crash prevention
1 star because the structure is very strong that mean the G force on the passengers is higher
The structure is not strong, saw some videos where the Ford Edge demolished a wrangler so badly
You will be happy having had a rigid structure in your car when your brain hits the dashboard.
If this is 1 star then my 2001 is -5 stars
No side airbags for second row?
haanjamiis No rear airbags have ever been in a Wrangler
I bought a Jeep...... WHAT THE FUCK HAVE I DONE!?
Quick take out a $1 million life insurance policy asap!
Respected Euro NCAP, Kindly give me the permission for using your valuable content in my videos, this helps us Alot.
Thankyou Euro NCAP.
Deep inside we all know . No 5 star car owner dares to crash into a 1 star jeep . But jeepers do
Why did it get only 1 star? The chassis worked pretty well
It needs to deform to absorb the impact, otherwise all that force gets transfered to the passenger. A car being that intact by a crash isn't good news.
It's more safe on road than in paper.
Automated braking and lane keeping systems should not factor into 'crash testing'. Those systems can easily fail under numerous weather conditions, as well as during regular wear and tear, and they do nothing for the actual crash itself.
Me after seeing a 90 Miata crash test: Wow, I can’t imagine every car being safe in the future I can’t imagine 2019
2019:
Lets goo im the 1000 like😌
dont care, still love this Jeep and always will!
th-cam.com/video/SbRNAYeTEWU/w-d-xo.html
J’ai une jeep et vue ma compétence de conduire je n’ai pas peur de ces test car ce que j’ai le plus peur c’est les autres conducteurs et non les murs de ciment que ce jeep mange en pleine gueule et oui ce tank es vraiment fait pour être rigide lourd boire un maximum d’essence et aller faire du off road! Sinon c’est pas fait pour le luxe et la sécurité en premier, c’est fait pour affronter les routes plein de nid de poule , quoi qu’il font de très beaux produit si tu es prêt à payer 80 mille dollars avec les taxes 🤣
The problem today is that it's now industry standard for a car to completely crumple like a beer can from a 5mph tap to the car in front of you
Whatch this and then watch the IHS crash test for the Chevy Astro Van.
The occupants of this vehicle would have been totally fine