not sure I wouldn't 3 bet with QQ with position. You might win the pot right there, but more importantly if villain does call, you know exactly where you stand since the range of cards he calls a 3 bet with shrink. Yes you're behind but he'll prob check to you so get a free card so the 3 bet raise holds some value post-flop as well
in this situation if you had AQ/AK would a semi bluff raise be ok if he raises fold and if he calls is it safe to say he is Ts Js or Qs and for bluffing how often would you do this does it depend on your history with the vopponent ?
How can we use GTO to establish approximate baseline for perfect opponent and then adjust from there for exploitative play? In other words, if opponent was close to optimal preflop, is there some rule of thumb for an approximate percentage of opponent's range would to raise for value? 50%? 40%? As he folded more to 3bets should we still flat call more for value and bluff/semibluff raise more even if he is skilled enough after the flop to use that information about that strategy against us close to optimally? I don't expect you to do all the work for us but maybe you could show us how we might go about solving this if it can be done or some general principals to at a least think about it more correctly or point me and the other poker strategy enthusiasts in the right direction? How many hands would we add for bluffs/semibluffs to construct an overall raise range? How would that change when antes are involved and opponent would be correct to call wider due to the added equity of the antes?
Your videos are awesome. I find myself really thinking a lot after this video since I always had thought it was correct to raise if our hand was in upper half a of opponent's range or more precisely had equity against vs op raising range with maybe some flats mixed in to balance strength and widen playable range due to positional advantage and likely dead money from blinds. With this new information in mind it seems to me we should probably flat more of these 50+% equity hands and raise some less than 50% equity vs a nit to 3bets, and flat those with 45-50% equity (or more if we have post flop edge or there are antes) and raise most of the 50+% equity hands against the player who almost always calls 3bets. Would this be mostly correct?
Amazing. You are my no 1 source for poker training. Great job on these videos.
+Shervin D thanks Shervin!
not sure I wouldn't 3 bet with QQ with position. You might win the pot right there, but more importantly if villain does call, you know exactly where you stand since the range of cards he calls a 3 bet with shrink. Yes you're behind but he'll prob check to you so get a free card so the 3 bet raise holds some value post-flop as well
Maybe you could do a video on a balanced 3 betting range vs. specific player types? Or exploitative 3-betting vs. specific player types?
in this situation if you had AQ/AK would a semi bluff raise be ok if he raises fold and if he calls is it safe to say he is Ts Js or Qs and for bluffing how often would you do this does it depend on your history with the vopponent ?
It depends on how villain will make the most amount of mistakes tbh
How can we use GTO to establish approximate baseline for perfect opponent and then adjust from there for exploitative play? In other words, if opponent was close to optimal preflop, is there some rule of thumb for an approximate percentage of opponent's range would to raise for value? 50%? 40%?
As he folded more to 3bets should we still flat call more for value and bluff/semibluff raise more even if he is skilled enough after the flop to use that information about that strategy against us close to optimally? I don't expect you to do all the work for us but maybe you could show us how we might go about solving this if it can be done or some general principals to at a least think about it more correctly or point me and the other poker strategy enthusiasts in the right direction?
How many hands would we add for bluffs/semibluffs to construct an overall raise range? How would that change when antes are involved and opponent would be correct to call wider due to the added equity of the antes?
secretbonus look for any videos by Janda...he's the guy you want to pay attention to when it comes to that kind of work.
How do you know when a 3 bet is for value? How can you know when you should 3 bet against your opponent?
That is literally the whole point of the video...
Great video even for old players lol
I’m so lost 😖
Seriously wtf is bro talking about
Your videos are awesome. I find myself really thinking a lot after this video since I always had thought it was correct to raise if our hand was in upper half a of opponent's range or more precisely had equity against vs op raising range with maybe some flats mixed in to balance strength and widen playable range due to positional advantage and likely dead money from blinds. With this new information in mind it seems to me we should probably flat more of these 50+% equity hands and raise some less than 50% equity vs a nit to 3bets, and flat those with 45-50% equity (or more if we have post flop edge or there are antes) and raise most of the 50+% equity hands against the player who almost always calls 3bets. Would this be mostly correct?
influentia1patterns you're on the right track...keep thinking through it...
Just calling with qq on the button? I’m sorry but that is not a proper play.
Thank u
You're very welcome.
Supposed to be BTN not BUT xD Great vid, thanks haha
2018
Prepandemic
And then reality hits...
You talking too fast
Way too fast! Way too much assumption that we already know what we’re doing! Very poorly explained for us beginners.
Omg, this information is so good. And the mono-tone voice is fcking worst thing I’ve ever heard in my life, hire a voice coach!!!
Totally makes no sense.. you don’t know what they have??