Thank the devil for this man who spreads doubt about climate change and other things. "What can we do with people with low intelligence? We don't know..."
It seems like the entire APA is based on the premise “Pain is bad” Which is the most obviously naïve idea i can think of. That’s literally how children think. Yes obviously becoming tougher is hard in the moment, but it’s also obviously better than a LIFETIME OF FRAGILITY Is PSYCHOLOGY of all fields becoming a “safe space”? It seems to me like the ethos went from “help people confront reality” to “say whatever the hell they need to hear to keep them coming back so we can keep making money.”
....JP was not unleashed... if this is him being "unleashed," it is about as threatening as a lethargic wolverine. But I do miss the days when he had more passion. I do hope for his sake, he finds the peace in the present day to focus on the important issues at hand.
Jordan is complaining and attacking his own profession. And at the same time tried to sue his peers. He went to court with unreliable science too. This is not science, it is him ranting. He has no science to demonstrate.
The guidelines were a product of 40 years of research peer reviewed by the community of psychologists. If Peterson feels so strongly against it why can't he just produce a research that would counter it and present it for peer review. it seems to me Peterson is the one being unscientific for his own personal agendas.
Anyone who throws around useless terms like "peer review" doesn't have a clue how science works. Or should work. All that "peer review" means is that everyone in that field thought the same thing. When the field of psychology is overwhelmingly dominated by leftist, radical Marxist ideologues (and OPENLY so), then it isn't very hard to have an article that blames unscientific theories like "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" for the existence of male problems, be "peer reviewed". B/c that's exactly what these woke ideologues have been spewing against men for the last 50 years. The ironic part is that he DOES cite *actual* research that blatantly refutes the conclusions made by the article... research that is also "peer reviewed", but that doesn't seem to matter to much to you b/c it debunks the asinine conclusions you clearly agree with.
@@SabatSch95 Well put. Anytime someone claims obvious ideological hogwash is credible because of its supposed academic support I just point them to the Hoax papers published by Lindsay, Boghossian and Pluckrose. Yeah, your idea may very well be endorsed by your peers but that means less than nothing if your peers are echo-chambered zealots.
He says in the interview the letter is a contradiction of established behavioral psychology that *is never disputed* by the letter or anyone else. When you capture the insitututions you can "peer review" any bloody thing you dam well please into being "the truth". In short, the psychologists who backed and wrote the paper are feminist liars who hate men and control the academic institutions through intimidation, which is why he called it a political treatise at the beginning of the clip. It's like you didn't even watch the video
The APA guidelines are clearly stating that "Masculinity IS Toxic", period. That's straight up anti-Male, woke Feminist BS propaganda, there is nothing scientific about it. As a Male myself, all I can say after reading about them, is that if I had any psychological problems (and to be frank, I unfortunately have such problems), I would NEVER go to a psychologist, ever. They are NOT there to help us men, it is clear that they want to make our problems worse! So, fuck them!
This is the most badass JP I've ever seen, usually he tries to give some leverage to the opposition, here he's unrelenting.
Because its sickening.... And disgraceful to all of the psychologists that have built this field up over the past 100 years
This man is a boon for manhood in this modern destructive era of liberalism
Protect Jordan Peterson and what he says
Thank God for this man!
Thank the devil for this man who spreads doubt about climate change and other things. "What can we do with people with low intelligence? We don't know..."
He is a light into this darkness moments we are living in!
Peterson is 100% correct!
Fatherlessness includes having a father who isn’t present.
It seems like the entire APA is based on the premise “Pain is bad”
Which is the most obviously naïve idea i can think of. That’s literally how children think. Yes obviously becoming tougher is hard in the moment, but it’s also obviously better than a LIFETIME OF FRAGILITY
Is PSYCHOLOGY of all fields becoming a “safe space”?
It seems to me like the ethos went from “help people confront reality” to “say whatever the hell they need to hear to keep them coming back so we can keep making money.”
Thats what happens when you have a field that is run 90% by women
Well that's the neo Marxist dream... A world without pain suffering and oppression.
The APA is now considered garbage.
You can feel emotions without repressing them whilst still enduring. Endurance and Repression are getting conflated here I think.
2:00 "It's anti-truth. It's worse than wrong."
The backdrop looks like the closed rolling door of a storage unit.
I love Jordan Peterson.
No lies detected.
Spot on. The APA is now made up of 80-85% woman
....JP was not unleashed... if this is him being "unleashed," it is about as threatening as a lethargic wolverine.
But I do miss the days when he had more passion. I do hope for his sake, he finds the peace in the present day to focus on the important issues at hand.
Voila un Homme
Jordan is complaining and attacking his own profession. And at the same time tried to sue his peers. He went to court with unreliable science too. This is not science, it is him ranting. He has no science to demonstrate.
The guidelines were a product of 40 years of research peer reviewed by the community of psychologists. If Peterson feels so strongly against it why can't he just produce a research that would counter it and present it for peer review. it seems to me Peterson is the one being unscientific for his own personal agendas.
Anyone who throws around useless terms like "peer review" doesn't have a clue how science works. Or should work. All that "peer review" means is that everyone in that field thought the same thing.
When the field of psychology is overwhelmingly dominated by leftist, radical Marxist ideologues (and OPENLY so), then it isn't very hard to have an article that blames unscientific theories like "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" for the existence of male problems, be "peer reviewed". B/c that's exactly what these woke ideologues have been spewing against men for the last 50 years.
The ironic part is that he DOES cite *actual* research that blatantly refutes the conclusions made by the article... research that is also "peer reviewed", but that doesn't seem to matter to much to you b/c it debunks the asinine conclusions you clearly agree with.
You mean a bunch of political advocates pushing an agenda
@@SabatSch95 Well put. Anytime someone claims obvious ideological hogwash is credible because of its supposed academic support I just point them to the Hoax papers published by Lindsay, Boghossian and Pluckrose.
Yeah, your idea may very well be endorsed by your peers but that means less than nothing if your peers are echo-chambered zealots.
He says in the interview the letter is a contradiction of established behavioral psychology that *is never disputed* by the letter or anyone else.
When you capture the insitututions you can "peer review" any bloody thing you dam well please into being "the truth". In short, the psychologists who backed and wrote the paper are feminist liars who hate men and control the academic institutions through intimidation, which is why he called it a political treatise at the beginning of the clip.
It's like you didn't even watch the video
The APA guidelines are clearly stating that "Masculinity IS Toxic", period. That's straight up anti-Male, woke Feminist BS propaganda, there is nothing scientific about it. As a Male myself, all I can say after reading about them, is that if I had any psychological problems (and to be frank, I unfortunately have such problems), I would NEVER go to a psychologist, ever. They are NOT there to help us men, it is clear that they want to make our problems worse! So, fuck them!