วีดีโอ

2:00 "It's anti-truth. It's worse than wrong."

....JP was not unleashed... if this is him being "unleashed," it is about as threatening as a lethargic wolverine. But I do miss the days when he had more passion. I do hope for his sake, he finds the peace in the present day to focus on the important issues at hand.

Who else misses the healthy, vibrant, sensible Jordan Peterson from 7 years ago, before he was demonically obsessed with gay people and steak.

Impossible to answer this question. You will never be able to tell if your choice was a matter of free will or not.

Thank you.

Wherei Jordan is here, he is trying to manipulate these people. Jordan has no established evidence to support this theory and has a habit of overselling his expertise and gets caught. . Well here is something to consider. Jordan is guilty of PRIDE, VANITY, ENVY, GREED, and WRATH. Look at how he started trying to deceive the courts in 2009 regarding the Sordi case. At the same time Jordan will not address that DURING SUSPENSION, LICENSEES MAY NOT PRACTICE PSYCHOLOGY OR REFER TO THEMSELVES AS PSYCHOLOGISTS. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request. Jordan is a Jim Jones or David Koresh wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.

Spot on. The APA is now made up of 80-85% woman

Maybe you need to see Jordan's entire picture.Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.

Jordan is complaining and attacking his own profession. And at the same time tried to sue his peers. He went to court with unreliable science too. This is not science, it is him ranting. He has no science to demonstrate.

I have a great tool to determine if people are in balance with themselves. If they take themselves more serious than 50 % they are out of balance. J.P. has some work to do :)

Person. From the bottom of my soul I am telling you that you are one cynical and deceitful bastard. What is there beyond all your nice talk about Jung and integrity? You are a spin doctor who sells the psychoanalytic messianism knowing FULLY WELL that it’s a bloody lie. Oh, wait. I forgot that you ask yourself so emphatically what truth is. Say no more. Who can people emulate to test their integrity? You?

Jordan is a disgraced professional read the casePeterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 714/22 DATE: 20230823

another social media account Jordan he was found being in violation of his profession, look at the case of Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 714/22 DATE: 20230823 . He is hardly a responsible example.

He a smart guy, but he equivocates by redefining "free will" so that he can say it exists. To quote him: "Free will exists in the sense that decisions are controlled at multiple levels of the nervous system." That's not at all what anyone means by free will. All phenomena have causal chains occurring at multiple levels. That is not free will by any definition. "(Our choices and actions) differ in terms of their degree of determinism." Really? How so? That's an assertion offered with zero evidence. Where is the chain of causality broken so that somehow uncaused "freedom" gets inserted? You say there's no "magic", but then claim there are degrees of determinism. So degrees of causality. What's the range of causality? From 0 to 100? From 99.99 to 100? What is it that fills the gaps if not "magic"? Randomness is not free will. "The brain executes decision rules that are not deterministic." LOL. Where'd you get that rabbit you pulled out of your hat? So there are rules, but they somehow don't get applied via causality? Please explain with evidence to support that conclusion. Even if you claim some decisions are random or are unpredictable, that in no way means they are freely made and somehow are not deterministic. "Free will is not what we intuitively feel it to be." Yeah, no kidding, but if you redefine it with some non sequiturs and hand waving you can pretend we do have it. Now we feel better.

The baffling pretzels y'all have to twist into to continue believing in free will

I just adore this man. I can’t even describe how much he motivates me and how big of an effect his words have had on my life. He’s truly inspirational.

I offen disagree with thomas sowell... but i think he is spot on here. Problem is, our education system kind of sucks in actually educating people with marketable and valuable skills. Therefore, not only is the poor struggling, the working class is stuggling as well, because neither have high value skills. We are hoping to be given a job, and i think that is detrimental to our economy and society.

Ayn rand is mentioned sooo many times 😆 x . how she got jp is beyond me. X

The APA should be more focused on the dysfunctional pathology of misandry that society encourge women to engage in rather than what Men and Boys think.

I found my appreciation for Werner years ago. Llistening to Jordan Peterson on;y adds more to my life. I respect each of them with an appreciation for the depth of knowledge and wisdom they share fully and freely..

The world's most annoying man

The APA is an absolute disgrace and the individuals which operate in it need to be held accountable for their travesties and misdeeds over the past century.

This man is a boon for manhood in this modern destructive era of liberalism

I love the message. Just get the hair out of your mouth.

No lies detected.

Protect Jordan Peterson and what he says

The backdrop looks like the closed rolling door of a storage unit.

I love Jordan Peterson.

I have been a fan of Ayn Rand for years, and I introduced my fellow gay and lesbian friends to her work, as well as my other friends. None of them ever were interested in politics or philosophy, but they got hooked on Ayn Rand! With the right, no effect. With the leftists, I don't even better. Because even though Ayn Rand was a supporter of a woman's rights to an abortion, my former friends, who went Woke, called me a far-right extremist; they would condescend to me, they would gaslight me, and then after they had the NERVE to say to me "I am still your friend," they Denounced me and slandered me.

Voila un Homme

You can feel emotions without repressing them whilst still enduring. Endurance and Repression are getting conflated here I think.

The APA is now considered garbage.

Here’s the guidelines in question, for skeptics like me. www.apa.org/about/policy/boys-men-practice-guidelines.pdf

Fatherlessness includes having a father who isn’t present.

Peterson is 100% correct!

It seems like the entire APA is based on the premise “Pain is bad” Which is the most obviously naïve idea i can think of. That’s literally how children think. Yes obviously becoming tougher is hard in the moment, but it’s also obviously better than a LIFETIME OF FRAGILITY Is PSYCHOLOGY of all fields becoming a “safe space”? It seems to me like the ethos went from “help people confront reality” to “say whatever the hell they need to hear to keep them coming back so we can keep making money.”

awesome

This is literally what David Hawkins

I like you mate, you make a basic nutshell of Ayn Rand philosophy.

Interesting.Sounds like he’s saying blacks should work for themselves.

Thank you. İ'd like to hear more about wealth mindset.

Look at what is wanted. When...now. Where/ home or work.

This is so good and so clear. Amazing work. I look forward to your future videos.

The Daily Wire is taking up this challenge of building a better America 🇺🇸. Renaissance "Make a Great America" *#MAGA*

She is stunningly beautiful 😍❤️

🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥

Ayn Rand was a Rothschild mistress and was privy to their plans. Once you realize this you lose respect for Ayn Rand.

Go get some skills!

"Greed" *is* good. The distinction made in the video between greed and Ayn Rand's more cited phrase "rational self-interest" is a false one. Rand did not make a distinction between the two concepts. In Atlas Shrugged there's an entire chapter called 'The Utopia of Greed' in which we get introduced to Galt's gulch. "Greed" like "selfishness" is a package deal that lumps to things which are not fundamentally the same, i.e., people who desire more of something rationally (more wealth, more children, more love, more holidays etc) and attain those values by rational action (i.e. trade) and those who don't, like the Bernie Madoff's of the world, who want more of something and use exploitation as the means of attaining it.

Great video. Hope you get more subs.