Crazy 24-3000mm Zoom Lens!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring this channel!
If you'd like to start up your own website or online shop, visit Squarespace for a free trail and for 10% off your first purchase, go to squarespace.com...
Nikon P1000 geni.us/Myrjn
Video Shot with:
GH5 geni.us/B0G3bWz
Panasonic Leica 25mm f/1.4 geni.us/9Pqes
Laowa 7.5mm f/2 geni.us/LqJ03
* I may earn a bit of commission if you use the product links above to help me keep on making videos for you, so thank you!
Music:
Blue Wednesday: / bluewednesday
Dezaulait: / dezaulait
#Nikon #3000mm #Zooooooooooooooom
For shooting weddings when you’re not invited
Or orgies
Honeymoons too.
😂😂😂
😆😆
😂😂😂😂
Is that a 3000mm zoom or are you just pleased to see me? 😆😆
Moriarty!
INGAF don’t worry no one would be excited to see you so it’s s 3000mm zoom ;) (don’t worry me too :( )
@@Daniel-uw9il u dont get it
Well I AM happy to see you....but it is just a 3000mm zoom.
It's a 3000 mm zoom.... sorry lol
The 24-3000 zoom is essientially a camera errecting
great rod
Or camera erectile dysfunction?
It probably saw Will Smith
"The whole point of a bridge is that you want to be on either side of the bridge." - Kai 2018
I'm stealing this and using it in my presentations.
Sorry, uploaded again!
Upload as many times as you like. I'll watch it.
All g bro
Second time lucky
Excellent if used with a good fluid tripod, tremendous reach. How does this compares with the more expensive Sony RX10 Mark IV, the latter has got a stacked sensor quite like the a9.
Wtf dude. Why would anyone want to watch a camera video without some proper samples? Dickhead
My first serious camera was a Bridge Camera fairly much like this one. It had a 24-1000mm FX equivalent zoom.
I actually disagree with the notion that these cameras have little purpose. Sure, I don't ever use it anymore now, (currently have a Nikon D7500 with 3 lenses), but I've never regretted starting out with the Fujifilm bridge cam (I think it was HS50 EXR).
As a starting photographer it allowed me to test out basically every aspect of capturing images that I wanted, so that I could figure out what had my interest most. Did I prefer shooting wide shots, or more zoomed in, for portraits, maybe tele photos would be my thing, for birds etc. And indeed, many pictures of the moon, and also of Jupiter and Saturn, and the Sun (with proper filter). It allowed me to test the water for astrophotography, by now I have a pretty good telescope for that, but many of the techniques I first applied with that bridge camera, I can still apply with the telescope.
Having full control over ISO, shutter time, and aperature, I learned the basics photography. I started out on automatic mode, then switched to the scene modes, and by the end of me using it, I only shot in manual mode anymore. I got to try out infrared photography (bought an infra red filter), I tried out long exposures at day time (10 stop ND filter), tried out a polarizer (filter obviously). The camera could also film, also in high speed. Had fun with that.
Sure, the image quality was poor, ISO above 200 was kind of unusable. But it sure was a versitile little thing. (Oh, I made sure to have manual zoom and a focus ring on it, cause I wanted to work with that).
So, in short, it was the bridge for me from point-and-shoot, to proper photography.
I started out with a Nikon B700 bridge camera and it allow me to test basically all existing focal lens except ultra wide or fish eye, also this camera taught me why I needed a faster aperture lens as well so many other things. Besides taking incredible shots in daylight I think bridge cameras are exceptional beginner cameras before moving to DSLR/Mirrorless
Well I still use such a camera. It has far more reach then with my longest lens while technicality is shorter 180 mm vs. 200 mm. However, it is more reasonable at 500 grams instead of this 1.4 kg monster.
"Moon or someone else moon." Lol😂😂
I'd prefer for 'someone else moon'. My Nikon COOLPIX L820 is enough for that 😂
I'll bet the guys sitting in the nosebleed section of the 2004 super bowl game wish they had this camera. LOL JK
That lens is a grower; not a shower.
;)
Tbh, it is both.
🚿.. shower
@natedicamillo3440 That's what I thought as well.
Well I’m very happy with my P900, I was stricken by a stroke and using this (or any bridge camera) allows me to take some fair photos. I just simply can’t pack up a lot of gear to go out life before. The truth is I may even get this one. But I still love ya Kai, your the best...
it's so hilariously big, i kinda want one just because.
Rich dads on vacation's gonna have back and wrist problems.
Alex it's huge. But actually lighter than your average DSLR
@@tsy1992 I've had it in hand. It's quite heavy actually.
@@TheNefastor i have one. It's lighter or comparable to my z6
That thing is tiny compared to my camera.
Jean Roch Not heavy, just huge and ridiculous.
lol @ "This is a camera and a bridge. I'm going to take a photo of the bridge." Kai is still funny after all these years :)
Its ok. Great for shooting heat haze and distortion
Girl: How big is yours?
Me: not much
Girl: come on how big!
Me: 24-3000
Girl: meh not bad
Me: it also has a focus ring
Girl: OH MY GOD
I actually love that camera and bridge cameras in general. I started photography with one. If you know how to use it, it's great !
heck yeah and they usually work on the smaller handheld gimbals as well and kick ass over that $13,000 canon. and the plus tax on $13,000 cost more than a bridge cam
Its the camera for flat eather shooters it seems !
3:19 I can’t unsee Kai without glasses
He kinda looks like Ken jeoung. (Chow from hangover)
1 second before please
why is 5:04 so goddamn funny to me?
it just doesnt stop lol
You are not alone, I laughed hilariously from that zoom, I still don't know why it was so funny .....
@@diamondfirst9956 Rudolph's dead eyes
Is it circumcised
most underrated comment
I was like number 69...
Just thought you should know.
When there is no lens hood on, yes
of course it is and works alot better than tha $13,000 canon 600mm. Damn that dude is small like he was in icewater
1. Kai is providing great entertainment. None of the " Hey TH-cam, this is bwomp bwomp bwomp and I'm here today with doop ditty doop blah" usual script.
I have the P900, and even though it has no 4k video, no focus ring and no RAW, I really love it.
The P900 IS Great! But my PANASONIC is just as good at *ZOOMING!*
th-cam.com/video/qmOb4GnRDKE/w-d-xo.html
Plus it's *ALOT* less expensive!
"Somebody else's moon" 😂😂
Isn't this an update to the official flat earther camera?
So Nikon is an official partner of FE or Nibiru watchers 😜
i scrolled down to see if anyone else had commented on this haha
It's got a longer zoom so should make it better to take stars out of focus ;)
Of course it is, towards the end he selects the "Flatiron" theme for a web template ;-)
I had the P900, and may update to this.... Unless there is a lens I can use on my DSLR's that can get close. Anyone know?
because it can see beyond the horizon (proved no one ever)
Brilliant camera I have a Nikon p900 I take planes in the air with , and I love it
I used to have the P900 and i sold it for almost the same price i bought it for they hold their value well, Im now thinking of getting the P1000, What i like most about them is that within seconds you can shoot anything from macro to the moon without having to change lenses, Great for spur of the moment events
Kai forgot to mention one major customer base for this type of mega-zoom bridge cameras: the Flat Earth "movement" 😁
is that snot?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Oh nooo he's a hooman being
No it'snot 🙄
The perfect vlogging lens
you forgot that flat earthers love the p1000 to zoom into ships on the horizon to pretend they aren't disappearing from bottom up
Omg was anyone else freaking out when he kept waving the camera around?
He could have poked somebodys eye out or seriously hurt a whole downtown
Just the review I was waiting for. Thanks, Kai
By far the funniest camera review i've seen in years.
bro you are awesome for pushing my music
If I worked as a PR for a camera manufacturing, I would pay Kai to NOT review my cameras. Whatever it would cost me, it would be money well spent.
I love this camera.
Love it.
Sony has an excellent one too.
Wrong person to review.
Someone who loves nature should be doing it.
Damn squarespace really sponsors EVERYTHING on TH-cam now...
tbh I could imagine worse sponsors for video's.
That voice is heavenly.
Your one of my favorite Photographers on TH-cam man I love how subtle and chill you are . You keep a cool low-key vibe which makes it pleasing to hear your voice and alot better than some TH-camrs who try to hard to be funny like PM but still love PM tho
And you post the best reviews. You cover every detail and you review whacky lenses that I love to see
1:09
OH GOD, another crazy who looks like those PSYCHOS who's talking to themselves, and this one look more dangerous with all those dangerous gestures.... OMG!! I HAVE TO RUN AND GET THE FU... OUT OF HERE..
Ever since my neighbor walks around her apartment naked ive been in the market for a bridge camera
Have you gotten what you were looking for?
I got this camera for taking footage of long range rifle matches. For this purpose it's doing a fine job. The picture quality isn't that good, but it's good enough. It's definitely a niche camera, but for that one niche, it's good value.
It's so weird seeing an Asian person with a deep english accent. Truly amazing
what did i just see.
Still needs more zoom, 5000mm lens next video??
Great beach camera 😎
Is there any possibility to get that amount of zoom using a DSLR camera? Which lens? I have canon Eos 200D
No. The longest zoom lens that has both relative wide angle AND telephoto for EF-S, is the 18-200mm as far as I know.
I bought a P900 to prove the world was round but the screen broke and the viewfinder filled with mist because I carried it up the Brecon Beacons and the moisture got in it.
It is great for London if you like architecture and hidden things.
I went off zoom lenses when I bought a prime and saw how much better the picture quality is.
My father has a Nikon P-something with a crazy zoom that makes the moon fill the frame. (not 1000 but older and lesser quality). I have a small M4/3 with a prime lens. If I take a good photo with my prime and crop it, I can get the same result, maybe even better.
But I would need to hold the camera against something to keep it stable.
I had a Panasonic FZ72, which had the same size sensor as this, 16.1Megapixel though, but had a 24-2795mm range, only cost £230 aswell, so was a great camera
It is 24-1200 mm, this is almost 3x as much. Yes, the Panasonic is a more balanced camera. When go to extremes you compromise something like the size.
Don’t remember when I last saw someone using one of these bridge cameras... but I guess they sell since they keep releasing new ones...
Andreas Suojanen i use one as my grab and go camera so I’m not hauling my FF kit around
I use a Panasonic FZ 1000 quite a bit. My daughter borrowed it for 6 months or so and I was surprised how much I missed it. I have several other cameras that can take higher quality photos but they require a lot more effort to get that quality.
You’re the second best Kai on TH-cam.
Kai Ross-Best is best.
I’ll show myself out.
It’s the FLAT EARTHER CAMERA😂😂😂😂
0:27 hey now, LL COOL J was really cool
What you mean, was? You watch NCIS? He's the coolest thing in it.
After Linda Hunt.
Nope he wasn‘t
Why do people think the earth is flat when they can see the moon clearly inst flat lmao
Maybe because they have mental issues?
Trump said it's fake news the earth is round.
Lmao no dude. The moon is clearly flat.
They could say it only shows one side so there is not other side. Ergo it would be flat :P
What you're saying is essentially...
(1): We can reasonably assume that the moon and earth are the same shape.
(2): The moon is a globe.
(C): Therefore, earth is a globe.
What you're not recognizing is that tho many flat-earthers affirm the minor premise (2), they do not affirm the 'major premise' (1).
Their syllogism looks something like this:
(1) The U.S. didn't actually land on the moon.
(2) If 'they' lie about one thing, they lie about everything.
(3) 'They' say earth is a globe.
(C): Therefore, earth is not a globe.
I'd say the issue with their argument is "2." I say that because...
- I do not believe the earth is flat.
_and_
- I do not think the Apollo 1 astronauts set foot on the moon.
When you were waving it about in the street I expected to hear the sudden sound of a moped followed by "giz dat camera fam"
I love the way you speak so calmly
I'm a pervert. I need one.
Same.
I'm still waiting for a review of the actual camera and what it offers apart from zoom. Whether it can focus accurately and consistently? Whether the viewfinder is any good. Whether the captured images, in raw and jpeg are good enough in definition and colour. None of which I saw mentioned. Plenty of silly shots of the extending lens, and that's about it. A mostly content-free video.
Come on Kai, you can do better than this.
Said 16MP and 4k but only 1MP and 960x540 due to diffraction -> directly to trash can
What about vignetting? chromatic aberration? distortion? HMM?! Hm!..
The sensor is probably too small to care about any of that stuff. However, still would be nice to hear any comments about it, or see if he would check for it.
@@akirafan28 Yes it's smaller and so it will perform better, that's exactly why
here that's not the sensor but the lens that act as a bottleneck, every defect of the lens will appear crystal clear on the sensor.
Most of all, whether it has any lights that go off and will give you away whilst you are spying on your neighbors at night.
Great video! Like always! Right off the bat with the comedy. These videos are always fun and hilarious to watch. Great reviews with great comedy thrown in.
Bonus: you can use it as a self-defense club if you're ever being mugged.
I felt like you bashed the camera. The camera probably not that great. But yeah.
Said 16MP and 4k but only 1MP and 960x540 due to diffraction -> directly to trash can
Sometimes you sound like jeremy clarkson from Top Gear 🤔
Saed Ali salam
In your hands it looks gigantic.
THIS *ZOOM* cam is also great for zooming!!
th-cam.com/video/qmOb4GnRDKE/w-d-xo.html
*No one* knows about THIS CAM!!
Classic Kai! Love it!
So it's the size of my 700D paired with the 18-135mm lens, but has the sensor size of my phone.
Other than moon enthusiasts and perverts, I don't see the purpose of this camera. In my opinion, just get a smaller bridge camera.
Just get a dslr or mirrorless camera with some lenses for exactly the same price that you pay for these bridge cameras. I hate such cameras tbh because I want my lens to be exchangeable.
well there is wildlife travel photographers who want something small
There are other (smaller) bridge cameras that have a 500-1000mm equivalent zoom. I don't think you need a 3000(!)mm equivalent zoom.
+EJ Tech.......true, I would rather a rx10 mk4 (or soon to be released mk5), but for birds I can see 3000mm being used
@@ej_tech I don't think you even need anything longer than 600mm. Especially today, where apsc cameras do have excellent image quality despite their smaller (than full frame) sensor. With the 1.5(or 1.6) times crop and a tele converter you can get really far too and that without a loss of quality because your sensor is still larger than any bridge camera's sensor that I know. I mean, of course there's personal opinions but I personally think bridge cameras are garbage and don't need to exist
3:07 Man, you need a tissue...
Honestly, those squirrel and bird shots actually made this camera seem appealing... If only they made a DSLR lens like this one
Dude this thing is literally a TANK
It's made of plastic. You want a tank (and a cervical disc) get a Nikon D4 or something.
"How big would a 3000mm lens be for full frame?" Probably a bit over 3 meters long. With a width a bit over 3 meters divided by the aperture.
Grab a nikon 1000mm f11 reflex and put a 3x teleconverter behind it. That's probably the smallest way of getting 3000mm on a full frame.
You exactly pointed out the reality in a positive way. 😎
This Nikon camera is nothing but just a tiny mobile like sensor, which is the reason why it can go upto 3000mm equivalent.
Well, no. The definition of a telephoto lens is that its focal length is great than its back focal length, i.e. it does not need to be as long as its actual focal length.
Not with a teleconverter.
Well, there's the Canon 1200 f5.6 that's smaller than that... with a 2x teleconverter it turns into a 2400mm f 11... a bit of a crop and voilà. ;) Sure, just a bit larger than the P1000 and a lot more expensive. :D
Cheers
An EOS R out for resale after one month. Sad. So sad.
Johnny4eyes Canon has gone from 0 to 22% market share of the FF mirrorless segment in 1 month with just one model. The EOSR is wildly popular with huge numbers sold, so inevitably there will be a few on sold.
@@nordic5490 Lame, it went from 49% share in a dying segment to 22% of the future with a worse product than most APSC cameras in 1 month only. It's a downhill.
@@hectormunozhuerta 22% with one model is quite good. You cant compare that to the 49% in the DSLR market with a full lineup of different cameras and lenses
@@geko9425 As I said, it's a downhill.
@@hectormunozhuerta No, you cant say this now. Wait 3 years and then lets see...
We had the P900 with a similar massive zoom for Safari in Tansania. My wife had the Nikon, I had a Canon 6D with a 100-400F4.5-5.6. The issue was the motor driven zoom and the autofocus that could not be pointed precisely on what you wanted in focus. I took amazing pictures, so did my wife - using her iPhone. Since then the P900 has never once been used.
That's the kind of thing Kai should have examined if he had bothered to do his job properly. Which he didn't.
1:25 and that is exactly how I used my first camera (a bridge) to get to the other side and get a “proper” camera, it was a start up to move on and do photography “properly”
Ah, the camera of choice for Flat Earthers.
Columbus almost sailed his dumb ass off the face of the globe,, I I mean the edge,, Theres NO Globe. No globe
5:00 thank me later..
Great video, again, might have to binge watch your full season
major advantage of this camera is this can be used as a jack for lift your car in case of tire puncture
It's for taking pictures of school girls in sailor suits in Japan. I'm sure it will sell like ramen noodles and sushi over there. In the USA and Europe, not so much.
At Akihabara in Tokyo, girls dressed as maids are extremely camera shy. I had to take out my 70-200mm to do some stalking looking like a complete pervert.
Its a kind of cheat camera. A 3000mm equivalent, which is possible due to tiny mobile phone like sensor.
which is like a pentax q if that's your thing
@@qt31415
Hmmm, yes.
i think for a casual hobbyist or someone who just wants far zoomed in shots, or even someone who just likes sitting on their roof and zooming in on random stuff really far away, this would work fine
Thank you Kai for explaining what bridge is 😂😂
Neither the voice nor the accent quite match the face of this guy.
it must be dubbed :)
So true
Girl, is that a 24-3000mm zoom lens in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?
Gonna name my son Loser so he can grow up to be awesome. Thanks for the logic, Kai!
That bridge joke, automatically made me like this video.
There is one sentence from this video that sums up this review, “Just skip the bridge.”
The way he holds his camera gives me anxiety
Kohl Zeppelin i mean he is Kai
The most interesting and funniest man on TH-cam. Period.
Thank you for making me laugh and providing me with the best camera specs
Expected more reviews than you trying to make fun of the camera.
Because it's something to be made fun of.
In an 8min video, takes you 5min to actually show something from the camera. What is going on? the quality of these videos is really going down hill.
I don't see a problem with it, builds suspense, the whole time I was thinking it was silly and then Bam! he showed us what it's like to go from 24 to 3000mm with one zoom.
Idk why you're hoping for some bland speed review, the full video isn't long so it's not hard to just watch the damn thing.
Kai is much funnier when he's not trying so hard to be funny but his videos are always worth watching... may be my favorite TH-camr! 👍
If you don't like you can a. Skip ahead, b. Fkkk off of the TH-cam page. What are you expecting anyway it's a review of a cheap camera.
Watching Kai for an actual camera review is like watching Jermey Clarkson for a car review. They are both the best in the world at it, yet somehow you don't come away any more knowledgeable.
Quit yo bitchin. It doesn't work like that here. You want a "real" review, go watch someone else.
Thank you for your videos, always worth a smile or two
You are a professional professional photographer.
Bought it, tried it. Images not as good as P900. Returned it. Got Sony RX10iv, way happier.
RX10iv is a perfect camera, very good results with low light. I'am waiting for the next model
Hilariously, the P1000 (and earlier P900) are the favoured cameras for shooting anti-flat-earth videos on TH-cam
well thats because the the p900 had a couple of videos that were accurately stated as 'bringing' a ship back into view after it was over the horizon....no matter how much you zoom...you can never avoid the curve..flattards do ma fucking head in lol
Such great jokes in this one again, Kai! Glad you're back!
“That’s a really nice shot of my toothbrush”
Really? This is a great camera for mums and dads for sports day or whale watching or watching surfers and so many other uses. Close shots to within 1cm of the lens too. And all you can say is it’s for perves and moon photos. Poor form Kai. They added 4K video, raw support and an extra 1000mm reach this time over the P900. Deserved better than this drivel. I love your light hearted reviews but be objective too.
Garbage 200mm is nothing. 800mm (PL 100-400mm) equivalent has served me well in the 28 games of Aussie Rules football this year I’ve shot. Nice shots of play on the other side of the ground. My wife got some great shots on the other side of the track of Usain Bolt with my P900. No larger sensor camera could have got those shots that clear without a lens worth $10000 or more. I just wouldn’t use it in poor light.
That's kind of the point of a bridge camera. Range for cheap.
That being said, when those $10,000+ lenses on the larger cameras are an option, they produce results that curbstomp a bridge camera, then throw it into a wood chipper. There's (generally) a reason those lenses and the accompanying bodies cost so much. *But there certainly is still a place for a bridge camera.
Azenturi Yes , but in no way, shape or form will most people by those $10,000+ lenses so there is a need filled in that market here just to be pushed aside by a flippant “for perves and moon shots” video.
@@Greggie_D Kai literally said there was an obvious niche that this kind of thing appeals to and there's a place for it. The pervs and moon thing was a joke.
His reviews were never objective to begin with. It's purely great entertainment coupled with some useful information. Take it all with light heart.
I bet more of these get delivered to houses with windows overlooking nude beaches.
The only bridge cams I'm comfortable using now are the Sony's (RX10 line) and Lumix's (the FZ line).
looks awesome for wildlife photography
double first
Glancing quickly at your comment I thought it said, "double FIST"....yikes
@@adamaj74 if you know a lady :-)
lol!
I had to switch to gay po*n because that was easier to explain
Man walks around with cannon entire day
you can see Saturn's rings with this camera.
Awesome!