ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- Buy the P1000 here: amzn.to/2R9pB9I
Remote for the P1000: amzn.to/2Oh0x1T
TRIPOD I use fr the P1000- amzn.to/31YQgdT
Panasonic FZ80 (1200mm zoom): amzn.to/2Qh5ftF
Watch my review on the Panasonic FZ80: • ZOOM ZOOM Panasonic FZ...
Aperture range is f2.8-f8. ISO for video is 125-6400 and for photo is 100-6400. The camera CAN be used while the battery is charging!
Hands on review with the new Coolpix P1000 by Nikon. The P1000 has a 3000mm zoom!! You can literally see the rings on Saturn and zoom in on other stars and whatever else you can imagine.
![TOP 5 Best Superzoom Camera [ 2024 Buyer's Guide ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vwvx53Hc_Wo/mqdefault.jpg)
![[🔴LIVE] งานประกาศรางวัล MAYA TV AWARDS 2024 : มายามหาชน](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nwmWYXXVwBY/mqdefault.jpg)
Get the most powerful zoom on the market here - amzn.to/2Q6WHaa
no thanks. rather get a real telescope (oh wait, i already do!)
Hugh Mongus does it take cool pictures?
@@hedone13x the camera attached to it does.
@@hughmongus1233 what camera, and what telescope? Do these two cost less or higher than Nikon alone? Appreciate the answer!
@@JAVC1962 there are lots of combos
I am waiting for Nikon P5000 to see all planets and stars clearly.
Nikon P5100 exactly
@akhi Sinha
When the time come to see the mars clearly with your cam.. you'll heard "astronauts" say "oh we used to go mars in seconds but unfortunately we destroyed that technology and it's hard to build it again" loool
I heard rumors that the image of the black hole was captured on the Nikon p5000 concept.
@@SagaciousDjinn are you sure? loool
@@GabrieLight *Sarcastically replies* Oh yeah, definitely positive about that one. Oh boy, oh boy, I'm definitely not fibbing around.
The P1000: for people who want to do macro Street photography, but don't want to leave the home!
You predicted the future
Me! Hahaha.
Haha! Lockdown heaven!
The ideal "corona camera"
@@jpsholland Corona camera !!!dead 💀 🤣 😂 😳
I got the P1000 for last Xmas & I love it! I have the D-80 as well, but the P1000 is so much more convenient for on-the-go photography. Just not having to continually change out my lenses is a big plus. I did purchase a separate plug into the wall battery charger and 2 extra batteries so I won't have to sit and wait for my camera to charge itself. :) And you will need a big, heavy duty tripod to handle the full telescoped weight of this behemoth of a camera. I seen the stripes on Jupiter a couple nights ago, but the wind blowing against the lens and tripod just couldn't afford me the clear image or stay on point for me as I wanted. I got frustrated and gave up. But my lunar photography blows my mind how it picks up way more than either of my expensive telescopes can! Maybe I just don't know how to use them properly? IDK, but I do know that I love this camera.
Thanks for this info!
@Damian Wójcikiewicz I use it for candid street photography and it's amazing. But I'm a total amateur so what do I know? It's been my go-to since I got it. 3 other cameras sitting in my closet wishing they could morph into the P1000... Birding each morning with it makes my days brighter.
@Damian Wójcikiewicz Of course... but the camera is very heavy, so you need to decide if you really want to carry 2kg around with you for hours... for spontaneous street photography i usually prefer lighter cams
@Damian Wójcikiewicz yes if you want to take a picture of someone 1 km from you 🤣
Hi! Have you ever print one of your pictures to see if the quality is hight? Cause it only has 16 mp and I don’t know if the pictures are good.
That shot of saturn is insane!
With a camera like this, no UFO will pass unnoticed...
but youll still gonna Record them with your shaky 1990's camera
ufo does not exist... There is no clear video with ufo =)))
@@NucleaR_EFECT Depends on what you mean by ufo. There are a bunch of videos of ufo but that doesnt mean there are solid photographical evidence of aliens. I have seen ufo's two times myself only caught it on my iphone from about 1km away and that is the very reason i am looking at this camera. Google hessdalen lights thats where i saw it.
@@Martin-nv3qh where are you from ??
NucleaR_EFECT Norway not far from hessdalen
I bought this camera and it paid for itself in a couple of weeks shooting news clips. The zoom range is phenomenal.
Well time to tint my windows at home
11/10 name
I've been waiting a long time to see what the P1000 can do, very impressive.
I was given the P1000 as a christmas gift.
Its limitations are easy tondeal with as prior I was using my Nikon D3200 with a Tamron 150mm-600mm lens, a lot of weit to lug around all day, the P1000 is a joy!
The biggest issue I have is it needs a higher pixel count as 16mp is very restrictive.
16mp is fine for Facebook, Instagram and image prints up to a reasonable amount. I've seen some fabulous images from a few that own this camera, albeit the weight gives me hesitation on purchasing it.
Telescope with a camera and with a really good zoom. Sounds like what I want.
It's a telescope
no, its a shit..
Nomad Viking
It's a telescope
'
hi N V...
binocular and telescope are more perfect clear focus...
is that right
@@1981OA the only shit is your existence
Yeah , you can see saturn with p1000
@@idonotsleep4220 you can see 4 pixels that vaguely resemble saturn*
WAS THAT SATURN? YOU TOOK A PHOTO OF SATURN? SOLD!
No... it was video 😀
I took video of Saturn with a p900, not as clear or as zoomed in, but yes, it's a thing I've personally experienced.
@@SmartGadgetShow Easy fix. Go thru the video frame by frame for the best one, crop it as a photo. It's a life hack I used with my p900 all the time with wildlife photography, more so with birds. They're so skiddish and hyper, and I few shots don't cut it in comparison to hundreds of potential "photos" that lie hidden in a video.
you can see jupiter and it's moons too
Why does Saturn look like a really obvious optical illusion?
I'm waiting for the 10,000 so I can take pics of my relatives in Europe
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lol
I have the FZ80 and it's great that you showed the difference side by side. Great review ! You have got me thinking of the P1000 a lot, the next thing I need to do is to figure out how to steal my own money to buy it without being noticed by my wife.
me too
Same
I was able to shoot the highest quality at 2400mm, and if you turn on super zoom mode with 4 megapixels, you can get up to ~9300mm which is 489x optical+digital zoom. Not sure if the P1000 is able to do this, but FZ80's price point, battery life and light weight is a win for me with 1/3 of the price :D
FZ80 is rock solid stable, nice for zoom and low light. At twice the zoom, you'd expect the P1000 to have double the stabilizing capability.
I need Eiffel tower for Tripod.
burj khalifa might be a better option.
Lol
@@SAJ.GAMING why not he is trying on his penis lol
@@Kidz_masti 3
@@SAJ.GAMING 😂😂😂😂
This is probably the best review of the P1000 here on YT. Thanks for that.
If there's one thing I d like to have seen more, is a side-by-side comparison at *equal* focal lengths e.g. both at 600mm and 1200mm. Having a shot with both maxed out (1200mm and 3000mm) makes sense for giving an idea of that the extra reach of the P1000 looks like. But I would have like to have an idea how the P1000 performs at equiv FLs with the Lumix. That would allow most of us to get an impression of IQ on shorter FLs. e.g. could the Lumix have superior IQ at 600mm or 1000mm? It's a question worth answering, as most might not often use the P1000 at its maximum reach.
I owe the P1000 is a camera a binoculars a video recorder is AMAZING camera!! I love it o bought extra batteries!! If you want a professional pictures ( not for you ) is amazing camera
Really good review. The P1000 may be big compared to other point and shoot cameras, but I have a 150-600 zoom with my DSLR. The lens on it's own weights in at 5kg / 11lbs, and this is a nuisance when traveling overseas with weight restrictions.
What lens do you have wich weights 5 kg??? Thats impossible. I hava an old 1000 mm maksutov (mto1000a) mirror lens and its only 3.5 kg. No way a 150-600 could weight 5kg.
@@pauka13 I was wrong in my estimation of the weight, I've just put the tamron on the scales and it was 2.1kg in its bag it 2.5kg
@@iallso1 You weren't wrong, you thought in terms of pounds not kilos. 5 pounds is 2.2 kg.
@@schizophrantic you give me too much credit, thank you.
I have one and totally love it. It does crystal clear sharp photos. Low light can be a problem depending on what you are shooting in my case football under stadium lights (action shooting). I like the weight it helps to steady the camera if you are hand holding shots. Video is awesome very sharp 4K. I bought a hot shoe boom microphone and it improved the sound tremendously. If you are using a lot of zoom get a tripod....something fairly heavy duty to combat wind shake on the extended lens. Buy it, it is a very good camera.
Do you feel nervous holding a grand in your hand?
@@misterneckbreaker88 Great question 😆 I have never really thought about it.. The camera has been a real trooper especially during the shut in time of Covid. I could sit in the back yard and use the powerful zoom feature to catch all the birds and small animals that frequent my backyard. It has also been an excellent camera to shoot the moon. I will tell you that it is best supported by a very sturdy tripod in conjunction with a long lens stabilizer for the P1000....otherwise you get shake and the weight of the camera and extended lens will sag and make it hard to stay focused on an object. All in all it was a great purchase...even at the $1049.00 I paid. Thanks for the question....keep shooting. Fred in Texas
@@fredfleming8905Hey I am not in the know with camera tech to know what is going to be suitable.
Would this camera be a good all rounder from family/friend photos all the way to zoomed in crisp subjects across the city (sounds handy for any sports day or adventure)
NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S with a canon eos R50 mirrorless would cost me a lot more but looks like it would be a similar image (based on my lack of knowledge) with having 24.2MP and the same 4k 30
@@konarr7158 Hello, after having the P1000 Nikon for sometime now its plus’s are birds and wildlife photography for sure. Extreme telephoto is not that sharp you must use a very solid robust tripod and I use a special mount to handle the heavy extended lens. Even with that I can get some drift doing Moon shots…another thing it does well. It’s a heavy camera to carry around all day and mine is only 16MP. On a scale of 1-10 for a single purchase do everything camera I would give it a 6. I use my Sony a6100 and a 18-300mm lens for a very good all around camera and the P1000 primarily shooting wildlife. Hope that helps.
Fred
Love Nikon cameras, they have always been the best.
my *Panasonic* also does good with the *ZOOM*
th-cam.com/video/rsv5Uy4c2Vc/w-d-xo.html
The Zoom isn't as far reaching as the P1000 but it's alot more *STEADY* a M̤̈Ä̤Ẍ̤ zoom
Great camera-still using the P900-would love the P1000📷
I'll purchase your P900
I'm serious!!!!
I’m liking the P950 lately
I have one and love it. It is not superb in everything but ticks most of the boxes for what I need. Some suggestions...have a sturdy tripod and spend the money to get a lens support extension. The camera is nose heavy fully extended. Buy the remote control. In video mode it is slow to auto focus so pan slowly. As said here low light is a problem. Shooting wildlife at a distance is awesome ...suggestion have a sunny day to shoot. It has a preset mode for birds and works well for that purpose....suggestion make sure bird is not in an area with a lot of shade ISO 400 and below or you will get some noise. If you go to Flickr you can see my shots under Fred Fleming.
I'm an amateur photographer and I was using my Sony xperia z1phone i dropped it. Hmm 😕
I was suggested I have a look at Nikon cool pix 1000 if I enjoy talking photographs. Wow! I'm impressed! Now my vision and this unit are ONE!
Thank you for the introduction. Love the camera.
Think seriously about it before spending all that money.. Do you really need a super zoom camera? What type of photography are you looking to do? There are some great cameras out there for nowhere near the price of this Nikon super zoom. Do you want to do street photography? Or do you wish to do, micro photography, or night shots? For example, I have the Fujifilm Finepix s99OOW with a 50x zoom.
I hardly ever use that zoom facility though, as I am more interested in taking shots of the subjects I have just mentioned. The s99OOW is nowhere near the price of the Nikon displayed, yet it takes stunning shots. I know what type of photography I want to do so that is half the battle won. So, as I said, before you spend all that money on a camera whose zoom facility you may not even use, think seriously about what type of photography you wish to produce.
The record limit is because of Tax laws, in quit a few Countries... Over 30min is Considered a MOVIE Camera, so it's a Different Tax Base, More Taxes...
Really?
That's complete idiocy. I'm willing to bet it's the EU since all they do these days is pass ridiculous laws.
Yes, my iPhone is definitely a movie camera.
@Angelo Cella Back in 2006, the EU controversially decided to classify high-end digital cameras as video recorders, which attached a customs duty of 5-12% for digital cameras imported into Europe. The classification was decided not just based on digital cameras' improving abilities to record video through its lens and sensor, but their ability to record direct input from external sources like televisions. A home video recorder tax would theoretically offset money lost from users recording movies off broadcast television or cable onto digital devices, though the EU has never been very clear on the tax's intent. The tax's consequence, though, has been felt in every digital camera user looking to use a DSLR in place of a camcorder, as camera manufactures would rather limit recording capability in software than raise the price of its cameras (or lower their margins).
Where in the world would any cinema be recorded as one whole single movie file? Jeez
excellent review and great footage and photos- Saturn blew me away!- thanks for posting!
The price scared me away ...
i just bought this recently after having the p900 saved on my bookmarks but i finally got the money to be able to buy it and was told to get this instead. my other dslr from 2010 doesn't have video so I'm excited
How has your experience been with it?
@@xidiamond6851 i have been enjoying it and learning a lot of different ways to shoot things with different settings bc not needing to switch out zoom lenses gives you more time to be playful with other setups. i look up tutorial vids for settings suggestions for certain things and just practice. i think personally it's worth the price especially for the moon pictures alone
Wow! For taking my own photos of the Moon 🌘, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn etc etc & so on and so forth, I shall certainly be obtaining one of these beauties. 👍
🎩
Would be nice to have a larger sensor but as sonn as you increase the sensor size the effective zoom drops. It's a '3000mm equivalent' because its a tiny sensor. If it was a full frame sensor your lens would be 3m long :-)
Actually, when measuring focal lengths of lenses, the length is much closer to the distance between the rear element and the sensor of the camera. It would be closer to the lens would need to be 3 meters long and then you hit the first piece of glass in the lens, and then you get to the business end of things.
www.nikonusa.com/en/learn-and-explore/a/tips-and-techniques/understanding-focal-length.html#
Or, sanity checking myself, and seeing that the 800mm 5.6 from Nikon is listed at 461mm long overall, I could be completely wrong 😀
@@bobwill oh yeah :-) 'distance from the centre of the lens to the focal plane or equivalent distance in a compound lens' , which it obviously is. At least someone was paying attention :-)
That would really only apply with a single element lens, such as with a refractor telescope. A teleconverter can double the focal length without doubling the physical length.
But if it was a larger sensor you will be able to crop more in the image and have the same zoom.
This has got to be one of the best if not best cameras for plane spotting, with a 3000mm lense and 125x zoom, I’d expect good things. Hopefully will be getting one sometime this year.
Would this be better than an rx10 IV? Or a DSLR option, just curious
@@MatthewMKF Well it’s almost a year later and I’m still deciding between this and a few other cameras. It depends if you want to take pictures or record.
@@MatthewMKF The RX10 is probably better quality video wise but nothing beats the P1000’s zoom.
@@MatthewMKF a DSLR is also a good option as long as it can record and you have a lens that is at least up to a 300mm zoom. A lens will be necessary, but yes a DSLR is a good choice seeing how many different cameras, lenses, and accessories there are.
@@FrequencyORD for a higher price, would the a7 IV and a 200-600mm be good?
Being able to see Saturn is just ridiculous. I had a Canon 600D the last time :D
Or just get a cheap dobson telescope for the 600D. Images will be immensely better.
@@KP3droflxp P1000 is the favorite camera of the flat earthers. They cannot focus it on any celestial object and use this as a "proof" that stars and planets are fake.
@@KP3droflxpmake sure you also get a camera adapter
Still looks pretty impressive for a 'point and shoot' camera especially if you compare it to the size of a lens at half the focal length. Obviously it's never gonna compare to a dslr but those can cost several times this camera just for the lens.
Also about the size, after seeing what a lens with a large focal length is like, I thought this camera looked small!
I really really love this camera. I am still learning every day!
Patrick can i have your email so we can be in touch i need help with that with the setting
I'm still waiting for the p1100 so I can see into the past and future
Now that's a camera I'd buy❤️
Honestly that handheld footage was amazing. I've seen shakier footage on tripods at 800mm eqv.
I have Nikon P1000 ,Amazing Zoom !
How much was it?
I also would like to know ?
as per 3:95 (approx), you do not have to use only the wall adapter to charge the battery. You can use a USB cable from your laptop to charge as well as the wall adapter.
Man that zoom is incredible
It’s a cool idea, and I think this will make a perfect casual camera for astronomers and earth scientists (saying this as a planetary science major). But everything other than the lens just isn’t good enough if you can only get one camera. I got a Sony RX10IV as my one-camera-for-all solution, and I still think it’s the best out there for anyone who just wants to carry one camera everywhere. The zoom on it is also pretty great and IMO more practical.
Thanks very useful info.... I'll look into that one too.....
The "perfect... For astronomers and earth scientist".. Says is perfectly 👌
RX10IV is double the price of this camera. lmao weird flex, dude.
If you get too much zoom, you will start to be able to see distortions caused by the air refraction. So although the P1000 has an incredible zoom, you’re very much gonna get the same stuff with the Panasonic FZ80 because the zooming is just enough before the distortion ruins your image.
Random RimRock that’s what these amateurs don’t get. Close is everything. You’d be much better off figuring how to get closer.
@@the_original_skytiger Right, you know the situation of everyone on the planet the best. Everyone else is stupid.
@@pekarna Just quit whining and get closer. You'll see I'm right.
Anyone catching UFOs with this?
They only capture video of UFOs on a potato camera
Glad you mentioned so many details, particularly that the camera cannot be used while charging
The camera can be used while charging. That was a mistake.
Ah lol
Thinking of getting this for my wife. We are amateur birding photographers. She finds the Lumix GH4 too complicated for video. P1000 would be perfect for her by the looks of the controls and it's more limited menu. Just not sure if her small hands will be able to properly control in handheld mode. I know it's only 3 pounds, so that's a huge plus. I haul around the Nikon D500 with the 200-500 zoom, so by comparison, she might appreciate that. Thanks for the excellent review.
After taking long range video with my P900, I use 3-D glasses to view the results. (kidding). it takes a steady hand or a tripod. Love my Nikon.
my *Panasonic* also does good with the *ZOOM*
th-cam.com/video/rsv5Uy4c2Vc/w-d-xo.html
The Zoom isn't as far reaching as the P1000 but it's alot more *STEADY* a M̤̈Ä̤Ẍ̤ zoom
@@tumarbongrox6074 of course it is... but if compare them at the same zoom, I'm sure the p1000 is much steadier...
At 0:55 I almost misheard when he said " its like double the size of my pen......asonic"
So I wasn’t the only one who heard this 😂
Same with me. I thought i heard it wrong 😆
Thank you for the review. I am going back and forth but this helped!
I just got the P1000 in the mail yesterday. Planning on taking it out this afternoon. Thank you for sharing this video.
Great camera. How are you getting on with it?
@@UFO-Ark This is the 3rd time I have responded to your question. The reply button keeps disappearing. I am simply exhausted.
@@UFO-Ark I have been out in the countryside for several hours trying to get the P1000 to work. Simple things like ISO, Aperture, and Shutter speed could not be set without great difficultly.
@@UFO-Ark The P1000 is not functional. Too many error and software difficulties. A decent photographer should not have to put up with what I went through today. I took 60 pictures and they were absolutely lousy. Settings could not be adjusted. Settings would disappear.
Apparently, a fully charged battery will only last for 240-250 shots. On a normal outing I can take 800+. Also the burst mode will only take 7 shots, then it takes up to 12secs to write to the memory card. As soon as Nikon fixes these problems, I'll be first in line and I'm a Canon shooter.
This camera needs a tripod for capturing image at extreme zoom...
Even with its cons its still impressive kit
I have P900 for long time.. P1000 for its price is not a perfect deal.. I will stay with my P900
I don't think the P1000 is any better. Even in the video you can see the FZ80 is near as good. It doesn't zoom as far, but the P1000@3000mm is only pixel junk. Digitally zoom in the picture of the FZ80 and you would get the same result. lol!
@@REDxFROG yup. P1000 is no big deal ;)
P900 is 1.5MP and p1000 is 1MP so the p900 has a lower lens zoom but an higher digital zoom.
I went from my F801/F3. Film camera's to a Canon digital.. WHoops. By Bye.
then a P500. then P600.
as long as you stay BELOW the digital Zoom on them they give fine shots.
All the Digital zoom does is select centre of largest zoom range and blow it up.
You want bigger. Get closer.
I'm old school never play with my shots. what I take is what I use.
We go O'seas every yr and use both my P600, with My Samsung phone for movie type shots.
At 77 yrs my eyes tell my Brain. "You ain't gonna see any better than that with
these eyes so I'm fine. (They pretty good as long as you don't want action stills.
The mechanisms are too slow to react.
My Nikon P801. 8000 shutter was best I ever had. even over the F3 for Jet
sprints. Arrows and even Projectiles on Macro.
But film too exxy for the working man nowadays, even processing your own.
@@REDxFROG
To my opinion the 3000 mm shot is not pixel junk. It is not as good as the more normal range, but it is actually surprisingly good for such an insane range. Most of the degradation can be attributed to the atmosphere.
We have to keep in mind what we can see there is not possible to see usually. I have seen moon photos taken with that camera, which shame pics taken with a $ 4000 telescope. Lastly, remember what you had to pay for a single 3000 mm photo lens.
I think a not perfect picture is still better than no picture. I would be glad if I even had the FZ80 mentioned, but the P1000 opens a new door for many of us.
The "lack" of a touch screen is a blessing, real buttons is the way to go!
The sharp look at the spider followed by the zoom out highlights the awesome zoom of this camera. I have the P900 which has been pretty good.
The P stands for PERV 😂
P E R V O N E T H O U S A N D
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😯 Hey, you might be right.
😂😂😂😂
Thats what we call " scumbag zoom "
So far, the best informative video on the P1000. Thanks~! :)
Great review! I was really interested in getting one but out of curiosity I went and look around in the pre-owned market and see if there's any P900 for sale. I found myself a like-new condition P900 at less than half the price of a new P1000. Sure, it lacks the 3000mm zoom but 2000mm is also fantastic. Much smaller and lighter too.
You can buy external battery chargers and spare batteries. I’ve never used the wall charger.
Saving my pennies for a P1000. Awesome video, thank you for showing perspectives!
I was thinking of one of these, just for a toy really, but of all the things they improved over the P900, not putting in a bigger sensor was just daft, going to have to give it a miss. As the P900 is half the price, and the zoom is still 2000mm, i might pick up one of those, just for some zooooom fun :).
I have a P900 it does the job well. I don't consider the P100 worth double the cost. I bought a circular polarizer and a solar filter for it and I very pleased with what I can do with the P900
I had a p900 and now have a p1000, the sensor works fine.
All this P-1000 talk drew me to look into the P-900. I’m gonna pick one of those up too. :) $599 here where I live.
Bigger sensor would be impossible without massively increasing the weight, and price.
I use a lumix gf3 with a 100-300mm that's a 200mm-600mm equivalent, or I can use an adapter and use my sigma 150-600 That's 300-1200mm equivalent, but with that set up and weight, plus no image stabilisation it has to be used on a tripod.
Lumix gf 3 is a micro 4/3rds system.
I guess it could be done with a 1inch sensor but it'd be 4 times the weight and twice as long and cost a few thousand bucks.
It's made at a price point to sell, designing it isn't the main issue, it's trying to sell it, who would buy a 1 inch sensor camera with a 25-2000mm equivalent lens that weighs 4kg and cost 3-$4,000..
Even at this price they'd need to be able to sell a lot to be worth the cost of development and manufacturing of it.
The P900 is damn good for what it Is, the p1000 I don't think will sell that well, the kind of people who buy these types of bridge cameras aren't the type who want to pay that kind of money for it.
It needs to drop down to around $700 ... £600ish before it starts selling in any great numbers
I think it will drop to around 700 after 12 months, it's new so price is high, i was trying to find the launch price of the P900 so see how much it had come down by since launch (if any). The 1/2.3 sensor is about a crop factor of 6, which is as you have said why the zoom is so large, put in a bigger sensor and the zoom would have to be redesigned, maybe not much heavier, but larger yes.
As for price, yeah a £1000 (in the UK) is way to much for the performance of a mobile phone camera in terms of sensor.
Amazing afffordable gear for bird hunter and wildlife!
Is it also posebil to charge battery whit powerbank 10kmA 20kmA ? And at same time keep recording video photo ?
I guess its posebel so you can continu more than 30 minutes whit using USB powerbank togeter.
What was this shot on?
aside from my current Nikon Coolpix B700 that's capable of zooming in to the moon clearly, i am more thrilled to have this P1000 or P5000!
Any signs of abnormal or overheating at long 4k recording sessions ?
I looked at this and ended up getting the Lumix FZ-1000. The image quality is better, as is the weight. The only thing the Nikon gives you is the zoom, and the Lumix does just fine with its zoom. The Nikon zoomed in shows too much wobble. The 20.1 sensor is much nicer on the Lumix, as well. If you buy the monster, you'll be fighting the weight, the smaller sensor, the noise and other things. I don't think this will be on the market much longer.
hmm... 3000mm equiv. lens and it's still not enough to fill Saturn in the whole frame.
I would like to see a 10000-20000mm equiv. lens in the next model if that's possible :)
That's ridiculous and unrealistic
He might have been joking :)
i believe u can see american flag on the moon with "made in china" tag on it.. :)
The transparency of the air is the real limit for amateur astrophotography. Professionals have the Hubble for it.
You are NOT going to get Saturn to fill the frame with ANY Earth based camera or telescope. The aperture needed would be miles wide. You will need Voyager or Cassini.
I used to own FZ80. It's a very capable camera. I could shoot with one hand while drinking my coffee!
I have owned a P1000 for three months now and I love it. I mainly take photographs of native animals and birds. The best thing is you don't need to carry a selection lo lenses. I have taken shots of a pair of ducks at three meters to a kangaroo at 1000 meters both were acceptable quality to put on Facebook I don't need professional quality it is so much better than using a mobile phone. Yes, it is heavy but so is a box of assorted lenses. I am very pleased with the camera and would say yes buy one for a keen hobby photographer.
Great review. I’ve got the p900 a few years now. Just took great pix of a full lunar exclipse. This camera is an even better version of the 900 and is worth it. go straight to 8:37.
Telephoto to me is just another version of reality- it’s happening yet we cannot perceive it. Just like micro and macro worlds. Who wouldn’t want the chance to perceive more of reality?
ready to record some hot activity on the beach 🤣🤣🤣
😁😁😁
2 piece chicken meal in the beach
Only people at nude beaches are horny old fat men, have fun taking dick pics I guess LOL...
Going to the wrong beach, beaches here is more boobs. less gay.
WE LIVE ON A FLAT STATIONARY PLANE WITH A FIRMAMENT ABOVE. ITS A CLOSED SYSTEM. WE CANNOT LEAVE THE EARTH. THEYVE NEVER BEEN TO SPACE. NOTHING GOES IN OR OUT OF THE FIRMAMENT. THE ROTATING GLOBE IS A LIE! WHY? TO MAKE US FEEL INSIGNIFICANT. THEYRE HIDING CREATION/INTELLIGENT DESIGN. THE GOLDEN RATIO AND FLOWER OF LIFE PROVE ITS INTELLIGENT DESIGN. A FLAT STATIONARY PLANE WITH A FIRMAMENT ABOVE PROVES ITS INTELLIGENT DESIGN. THE SUN AND MOON ARE LOCAL LUMINARIES. THE SUN IS NOT 93 MILLION MILES AWAY. THE MOON IS NOT 250+ THOUSAND MILES AWAY. THE MOON IS SELF ILLUMINATING. THE PHASES OCCUR REGARDLESS OF THE SUNS POSITION. I DONT THINK THE MOON IS EVEN A SOLID SPHERICAL OBJECT EITHER. THE SUN IS MORE CONSISTENT WITH THAT OF A HEAT LAMP. WATER WOULD HAVE TO FLOW UP HILL FOR A GLOBE TO WORK. "THERE IS NO UPHILL ON A GLOBE" SAYS GLOBERS. GIVEN THAT LOGIC , THERES NO DOWN HILL ON A GLOBE EITHER. WHY WOULD WATER FLOW AT ALL? CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. IF IT WERE A GLOBE ROTATING ON AN AXIS 1000 MILES AN HOUR AND HURLING THROUGH SPACE TOWARDS POLARIS THEN NORTH IS TOP/ FRONT ... EQUATOR IS THE CENTRE/MIDDLE AND SOUTH IS BOTTOM /BACK ... THE EARTHS MOTION WOULD CAUSE DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATION... WE ALL KNOW THE EQUATOR IS THE CENTRE / MIDDLE. .. THEN WE ARE SUPPOSEDLY ROTATING 1000 MILES AN HOUR ON AN AXIS WHICH MEANS CENTRIFUGAL FORCE IS GREATEST AT THE EQUATOR. THE IMAGINARY FORCE YOU REFER TO AS GRAVITY WOULD GRADUALLY GET STRONGER TOWARDS THE POLES . ITS AN "OBLATE SPHEROID"... "PEAR SHAPED" ... "A LITTLE CHUBBIER BELOW THE EQUATOR" ... THEN ON TOP OF THAT THE EARTH IS HURLING THROUGH THE GALAXY AND SPIRALING AROUND THE SUN AT 37,000 MILES AN HOUR TOWARDS POLARIS. .. NORTH BOUND! NORTH IS FRONT! THE PHYSICS WOULD BE LIKE A WET FOOTBALL SPIRALING THROUGH THE AIR. WATER WOULD MOVE FRONT TO BACK ...NORTH TO SOUTH... AND BE THROWN OFF AT THE CENTRE/ MIDPOINT / EQUATOR . NILE RIVER IS OVER 4200 MILES LONG AND FLOWS FROM SOUTH TO NORTH. THE NILE RIVER WOULD HAVE 572 MILES OF CURVATURE AT ITS MIDPOINT (APEX) THEREFORE THE NILE RIVER WOULD HAVE TO FLOW UP AND OVER 572 MILES OF CURVATURE OVER A DISTANCE OF 4200+ MILES ON A BALL. THE NILE RIVER WOULD HAVE TO FLOW UP HILL BEGINNING SOUTH OF THE EQUATOR,CROSSING OVER THE EQUATOR AND CONTINUE NORTH DESPITE THE ENTENSELY STRONG CENTRIFUGAL FORCE . IMPOSSIBALL! THE SUPPOSED CURVATURE IS 8 INCHES PER MILE SQUARED. .. 1) BEDFORD EXPERIMENT PROVES NO CURVATURE. 2) TORONTO ROGERS CENTRE SEEN FROM GRIMSBY 6FT ABOVE LAKE LEVEL FROM 30.84 MILES AWAY PROVES THERES NO CURVATURE. TOP OF THE ROGERS CENTRE SHOULD BE OVER 200FT BELOW THE SUPPOSED. 3) CHICAGO IS SEEN FROM MICHIGAN.THIS PROVES THERES NO CURVATURE. OBSERVER IS 6FT TALL. SO 6FT ABOVE LAKE LEVEL.60 MILES AWAY.CHICAGO SHOULD BE 2166FT BELOW THE SUPPOSED CURVATURE. 4) THE LONGEST CANAL IN THE WORLD IS 100 MILES LONG BUT NOT A SINGLE LOCH WAS USED. NO CURVATURE NO GLOBE! 5) LONGEST BRIDGE IN THE WORLD IS 102 MILES LONG. SHOULD BE ALMOST 7000 FT OF CURVATURE IN THAT BRIDGE. NO CURVATURE NO GLOBE! 6) LAKE PONTCHATRAIN BRIDGE IS 24 MILES LONG AND COMPLETELY LEVEL AND BUILT OVER WATER THE ENTIRE 24 MILES. ONLY 2 INCHES LOWER ON ONE SIDE . 2 INCHES IN 24 MILES??? NO CURVATURE NO GLOBE! 7) EXALT WIRELESS WORKS BY LINE OF SIGHT OVER A DISTANCE OF 146 MILES ACROSS THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA. THE TOWERS ARE NO MORE THAN 50FT HIGH. IMPOSSIBLE ON A GLOBE! PROOF OF FLAT EARTH! 8) SASKATCHEWAN. .. SALT FLATS OF BOLIVIA. .. KANSAS .... ALL FLAT FOR HUNDREDS OF MILES! 9) LIGHTHOUSES ARE SEEN FROM IMPOSSIBLE DISTANCES. LIGHTHOUSES WORK BY LINE OF SIGHT! 10) LASER GUIDANCE SYSTEMS WORK USING LINE OF SIGHT! SEA (LEVEL). .. AIR (PLANE)... PLANE (T) ..PLANE & LEVEL MEAN FLAT! THERES ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF OF A GLOBE ROTATING IN SPACE. NOT A SINGLE REAL IMAGE/FOOTAGE. NONE! MOON LANDING WAS A HOAX. ISS LIVE STREAMS ARE OBVIOUSLY FAKE AND FILMED IN STUDIOS. ISS=IN SOME STUDIO. HARNESSES, GREEN/BLUE SCREENS, CGI, UNDER WATER , AIR BUBBLES, FLY ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ISS WINDOW. ETC WE LIVE ON A FLAT STATIONARY PLANE WITH A FIRMAMENT ABOVE. THEYVE NEVER BEEN TO SPACE. ITS A CLOSED SYSTEM. WE CANNOT LEAVE THE EARTH. SPACE IS WATER. "GRAVITY" IS AN UNPROVEN THEORY. IT DOESNT EXIST. ITS A PATHETIC DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN HOW EVERYTHING STICKS TO A BALL ROTATING AND FLYING THROUGH A "VACUUM OF SPACE". ITS REALLY JUST DENSITY AND BOYEUNCY. WEIGHT. UP AND DOWN. LIGHTER THAN AIR AND HEAVIER THAN AIR. JUST MOLECULES INTERACTING WITH EACH OTHER. FOR EXAMPLE-THE MOLECULES IN A ROCK ARE MORE DENSE THE MOLECULES IN THE AIR. THEREFORE THE ROCK FALLS THROUGH THE AIR TO THE GROUND. SIMPLE. TO ALL YOU TROLLS - (WE DONT LIVE IN A VACUUM CHAMBER.A VACUUM ISNT A NATURAL STATE) WHAT SEPERATES THIS VACUUM FROM EARTH ATMOSPHERE? "GRAVITY" ?? LOL WERNHER VON BRAUN (NASA FOUNDER / ROCKET SCIENTIST) HAS PSALMS 19:1 ENGRAVED ON HIS HEADSTONE. PSALMS 19:1 TALKS ABOUT GOD AND THE FIRMAMENT. SEARCH-SPRITES PROVE THE FIRMAMENT! ROCKETS HAVE HIT THE FIRMAMENT! SEARCH-ROCKET SLAMS INTO THE DOME (FIRMAMENT) SEARCH-"METEOR" HITTING THE FIRMAMENT. MOUNTAINS ARE GIANT PETRIFIED TREE STUMPS. DEVILS TOWER FOR EXAMPLE. THE INDIVIDUAL HEXAGONAL COLUMNS ARE PLANT FIBRES! TROLLS / SHILLS CAN TAKE A HIKE! LOL
did you use the digital zoom after the optical zoom for fz80?
The focus ring is a huge improvement over other point and shoots. Manual focus dexterity is important
@@mroldnewbie At such incredible zoom-numbers, trust me that a mechanical zoom-ring has to have a gigantic throw to be able to focus onto the thing you like. My Olympus MFT 50-150 mm or so lens at the far tele-end will give you a 300 mm tele (35mm equivalent). The Olympus lens has the great advantage of having a switchable focus ring. By pulling it towards you while holding the camera, the focus works fully mechanical. Push it forward and it's electromechanical. At the far-tele end (and especially with the 1,4 x teleconverter used as well) the mechanical focus throw is waaay to small to accurately focus on things. As you try to focus on that specific spot, you usually start 'tapping' the ring in the hope you get the right point into focus. In reality, you keep overshooting that point and you will switch to electromechanical focus, which, especially at both far ends of the lens, give far more fine control over focus.
Even my mechanically coupled videolenses (all full-mechanical by the way, exposure, zoom ánd focus is all directly coupled) that are meant to be focused by hand are quite hard when you get to the far tele-end of them. Their throw is better (and the ring doesn't have the same 'stickyness' of the Olympus) but it's still quite a challenge to focus on exactly thát thing you want in focus. And I'm talking about 1/3 inch sensor cameras there: my videocameras with interchangeable lenses don't have bigger sensors. The problems only get worse with bigger sensors as the depth of field usually decreases.
This seems like it would be better for taking video than for photography.
Much better!
No mention of picture quality, low light capability, battery life etc. General review at best...will need to search other channels for better detail.
I've looked around and it is clear that honest reviewers are calling it out for the many flaws. It's an overpriced gimmick that rides off the zoom capability.
Photo samples address the picture quality - better than a spoken opinion. He does mention the low-light capability when talking about the small sensor size.
@@reverendv8900 No - I am Admin for a fb Group called Bridge Birding. Only one member has a Coolpix P1000 (another has a P900) and their bird photos are FANTASTIC. And as anybody will tell you, bird photography is one of the most demanding photographic disciplines. Believe me, it's an _excellent_ camera.
I would love a camera like that for my son , he has autism / Aspergers and loves the night sky . But there too expensive for me . So we sit in the garden and put a vid on of the moon while looking up. Great .🔭👽🌝📷
Emma Clowes Buy a telescope
Yes please , thank you .
@@IAmValefree Can you please send me the name/model of telescope that you have used. My kid also autistic and has millions question about sky. Thanks
Best travel camera, I borrowed one when I went on safari, it bought me face to face with lions with out being eaten.
I do bird photography as a hobby. Now I use a nikon d200 and a tamron lens 500mm. Quality is great but many times I wished I had more zoom. I think Ill get this
@_Addiction_ I fucked allah last night. It was a good time
Thanks for the upload, good review and well explained.
After 30 minutes of recording it automatically stops that's kind of weird
All photo cameras have that limitation, otherwise they are taxed as video cameras (more tax) and so therefore...
P 1000 a beast
A "beast" with a TINY sensor which "magnifies" the "zoom". While the camera is fun, you will NOT get quality images with this camera.
Got a P1000 for safari in Botswana to replace the more bulky Canon with Sigma zoom, SOOO happy, forget the tripod, with arm rest in vehicle it was superb. Dont need zoom for lions and elephants, they walk past, but with birds it comes to life! Great camera but minor limitations.... like low light. They say its the camera of choice for photographing wildlife... on other planets!!
Yes, I watched it, now watched it again :) And YES, I bought it, but only did some videos yet. But finally 1,5 years later have started again :D Love it when use it!
It’s a private investigators dream 😂
its reality now.
dreams came true
SO where in sharp images in 2019?Why on earth produce something is not good enough, just to make money from amateurs?!Not good Nikon!!!
A Japanese friend works for Canon , she said all camera companies would like to take slowly development step by step to dig all customers pockets step by step , So, that's why climate changed owing to more fabrication of garbage , Aliens from Serpo planet , they don't have money system , so no crime in their planet , They are driving a vehicle floating in the sky , their products can keep on high end level and last for 20 years. They invent products for their life of happiness and peace not for money. Their free energy can't hurt their lungs. High tech just for the happiness of their planet , not for money. Spirit like Nikola Tesla .
This is a telescope with camera capabilities.
Basically :)
I'm glad you showed footage of aircraft because that's the exact reason I'm buying it. I'm an avid planespotter and need something better than my Canon Powershot SX420. This camera is expensive as hell but it's a price I'm willing to pay.
P900/1000 - the beloved holy grail of flat earthers. Videos of defocused stars? You got it. Moon shots that prove nothing? You got it. Sunsets that prove nothing? You got it.
It's pretty obvious after watching this video for sensor is far too small and the image quality is very mediocre...
You are buying this camera for the reach. If you try to shot Mars with 600mm on 1.4x teleconverter, the results will not be better than on P1000.
Making the camera with 1 inch sensor will require the camera to be larger, and heavier with 3000mm zoom range
+Haos666 it's far better with a 400mm
th-cam.com/video/DCfDMU92JqI/w-d-xo.html
@@johntheux9238 That's a 400mm Leica lens with 3 Leica zoom extenders. That setup would cost over 12k dollars, of course it would be far better than a 1k dollar point and shoot camera...
If the sensor was larger, the lens would need to be much larger as well. This camera is all about extreme zoom. It's the most zoom you can get for the price and in a relatively compact package.
@@KDErkisi Yeah, it would be cheaper to used a 35MP 1 inch sensor then used the digital zoom to reach the same focal length.
Every 3 years nikon release a new version, its mean soon nikon will make a new coolpix with more optical zoom, this is only reason I didn’t order it yet;)
The cons are not enough to dissuade me from getting one. Awesome camera. Thanks!
Goodbye privacy :)
Big Brother's been watching your every step for over a decade.
RIP privacy 😂😂
We allready have internet for that
@@arbanaskocudo privacy does not mean just +18 nudity
Privacy?!? What's that??? When was it the last time you had any right to it?!?
The only difference is who could afford the tech...
*I also filmed Jupiter (distance from Earth 967,000,000 km) and Starun (distance from Earth 1,660,000,000 km) with a camera*
Hello friends! You won’t be a photographer without good optics. No matter how many glasses I buy, everything is small and small! Progress! Matrices produce more and more, the image is cleaner and cleaner ... Only our eye does not change. It captures an increase in quality, which means it is perfect! And the lens is only one, like a simple two-convex lens. And the resolution of the retina, if I may say so, is not large, somewhere around 6Mp in black and white (main) vision. Is it really impossible to design a parabolic matrix and simplify / reduce the cost of the lens design !? What thoughts will you have about this, friends?
I bought one, and when the hype died away I realised I had dropped nearly 2 grand on a hunk of shit.
Unless it's winter in the countryside you get terrible heat distortion
Autofocus is garbage in any setting but bright daylight
The sensor really is pretty crap, tiny and low detail
Snapbridge is hot garbage. Because its a consumer camera nikon's computer software wont control it. DigiCamControl works, but because the lens is motorised you can only take unzoomed photos, which negates the entire point of the camera.
If you're getting lured by the 3000mm, take a few steps back and some deep breaths. Yes you can get some crazy photos out of it, but it will take a lot of massaging. Buy a cheap full frame, a second hand super telephoto and a 2x converter and you'll need to crop and massage the results a bit, but you'll have something that's 100x more versatile, and will have some resale value.
THe p1000 is a one trick pony. that will be worth it in a year or two when they halve its price.
Try to sell as soon as possible for 100 or 200 less, pay shipping and minimize your loss
I took it back and swapped it for an a7r2 and a 400mm lens, could not be happier
just as i thought, thanks for confirming.
What is it about you and saying massage when you really dont need to
You had a bad day and have not read the instruction good enough. It’s correct that the lenses take a lot of light, just about 1% is captured at 100 times magnification. It’s the same for all. I have a couple of these- B700 has the 25Mpx but just 65x zoom. But you cannot shoot handheld above more than 25x anyway. A agree about SnapBridge- don’t use it. I have a battery charger and a spare battery. Try it in macro mode, in the summer capture a bee at 1.27cm - they look great when they try to land on the flowers. But you need light, lots of it!
UFO observer's (and astronomers) dream. Put it on a tripod and aim to the moon/crater and record in 30 min segments. Have several battery packs so you can do at least 1.5 Hrs per night. And would love to see close-ups of those chemtrail planes too. Is there a shoulder mount?
P10000, invented by aliens so you can watch UFOS all day long. Just wait for it.
2:25 wow
*saturn*
Saturn .. it really is a telescope 😍
Good real world review , thanks.
I had the FZ-2000 which I returned on focusing issues and got the cheaper the FZ-82.
So hopefully I'll get the P1000 and the magazoom is fantastic.
You can image Saturn with the thing, but a telescope. it is NOT.