Patek Philippe Watches: 3 Things You Didn't Know

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
  • For our second swing at our In Focus semi-finalist, we’ve scoured the deepest, darkest vaults for the tiniest scraps of information to bring you these juicy facts today. You’ll find even more great Patek Philippe content over at Watchfinder.com. You’ll see links pop up in the top corner for stories we think you might like. There’s a link in description, too. So, think you know all about Patek Philippe? Think again!
    Featured Watches:
    Patek Philippe 5170J
    Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711/1A-010
    Patek Philippe Calatrava 5196R
    Patek Philippe Calatrava 6000R
    Patek Philippe Annual Calendar 5396R-014
    Patek Philippe Nautilus Perpetual Calendar 5740/1G
    Patek Philippe 5960/01G
    Patek Philippe Grand Complications 5270/1R
    Shop now for Patek Philippe watches:
    www.watchfinder.co.uk/Patek%2...
    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder
    Watchfinder is the number one place to buy, sell and exchange premium pre-owned timepieces. Discover more exceptional watches at www.watchfinder.com
  • แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต

ความคิดเห็น • 125

  • @watchfinder
    @watchfinder  2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    I meant 1851 not 1951! Whoops 😅

    • @hh3rjf
      @hh3rjf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And I was hoping I could crack a time traveling joke as well, but I was too late. :)

    • @johnfenech1135
      @johnfenech1135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was so looking forward to correcting you on this one! Catch you in the next video, I hope.

    • @johngreen6191
      @johngreen6191 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I got to that point, played it two times to make sure I was hearing well and stopped the video. Big mistake and anything else on this one I take with a pinch of salt.

    • @ragulsankar8195
      @ragulsankar8195 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What kind of camera is that you showed in the video ?

    • @kenohanrahan4745
      @kenohanrahan4745 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@johngreen6191 lighten up man, it’s not like we paid them to write produce and publish this for us

  • @WorldsWorstFishing
    @WorldsWorstFishing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Another fun fact about Patek, they actually make the dials found in MANY big name brands, a fact they themselves keep under wraps.

  • @eoinrobson2725
    @eoinrobson2725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "The Vatican appreciates a man who can be on time." Brilliant!

  • @FirestormAA
    @FirestormAA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content each & every time. Thanks

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox8605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Interesting stuff, thank you Mr Hands 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @stevefox8605
      @stevefox8605 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @N A yes, I was surprised it wasn't Alan Davies 😅👍🏻

  • @MJamilHoque
    @MJamilHoque 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!
    Love the history and facts.

  • @jimmurphy6095
    @jimmurphy6095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3:30 for the money shot.... Absolutely perfect...

  • @BrittPearceWatches
    @BrittPearceWatches 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I don’t always enjoy history videos, but I loved this! ❤️❤️❤️ I love Patek! They make some of my favourite watches! Gah, id love to own the 7234 one day.

    • @andym847
      @andym847 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are incredible, not only a great channel of your own, excellent collaborations with the likes of Paul Thorpe and Timeless Watch with the mighty 'O' (I can't spell his name either) but also dropping comments elsewhere. Brilliant Britney. 👏

    • @donkykon2094
      @donkykon2094 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t always enjoy history videos, but i love you big yellow teeth!

    • @glebs.
      @glebs. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's the art of storytelling for you. )

  • @aljazdraksler3306
    @aljazdraksler3306 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!
    It reminds me of the time i visited the Patek philippe museum in geneva.

  • @fofffoff7492
    @fofffoff7492 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, this one was simply brilliant. This build up was pure pleasure, a Stairway to heaven.

  • @nicalev
    @nicalev 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great history lesson 👍👍👍👍

  • @sameagle988
    @sameagle988 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The true thing about Patek Philippe you’ll never be able to afford one.

    • @TheWoWBane
      @TheWoWBane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A calatrava is not that expensive (Especially considering the prices Rolex watches are going for now), you can save for one.. but if you want something more complicated, then I'll agree with you

    • @sharinglungs3226
      @sharinglungs3226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I would have a hard time justifying the price for a watch. I guess that’s why they call these watches luxury watches or aspirational watches. I feel like if I ever got one I would be too afraid to get it scratched or wear it sparingly.

  • @tommasodeguio
    @tommasodeguio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Masterpieces. 🤤😍

  • @user-fi5fr9us2t
    @user-fi5fr9us2t 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A brand for the once in the know! For the one who don't need to prove anything... I'm lucky to have owned most luxury brands over my twenty years of collecting, including the modern independents, some are better in this, some are better in that, but the restrained elegance, the soul, charm, the wear comfort and the feel on the wrist, with all the horological mastery in one package can't be seen better than in a Patek Philippe watch!

    • @chrismuz
      @chrismuz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So ALS is a brand for those twice in the know?
      ;-)

    • @user-fi5fr9us2t
      @user-fi5fr9us2t 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chrismuz No, Lange is a good looking movement and great finis, in a hockey puck case, with high unreliability(owned five of them), not even close to Patek accuracy...

  • @fabreezethefaintinggoat5484
    @fabreezethefaintinggoat5484 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Czapek is still a watch manufacturer in the Czech republic ,also 6:07

  • @RoelfvanderMerwe
    @RoelfvanderMerwe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel is perfection

  • @ariehchrem3067
    @ariehchrem3067 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ooh very subtle dig at our boi Nico 😂

  • @tomrutter1637
    @tomrutter1637 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    8:20 The Pope gets a PP. The head of the Anglican Church has one (Queen Ez II) . The Dalai Lama was given on by the United States. I need to start my own religion so I can get my own Patek Phillipe. "Kneel peasants, the King of Atlantis wants his Nautilus!"

  • @frantavomacka1798
    @frantavomacka1798 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:20 Number 10 is lovely really.. At this price point, i would be happy to find this on the dial

  • @VintageInvicta
    @VintageInvicta 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Again great video 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍🏻

  • @anthonystevens8683
    @anthonystevens8683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The light hearted history delivery was excellent, the part about travelling in time was nicely timed after all a watch is a sort of time machine.

  • @kavichauhan5728
    @kavichauhan5728 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice

  • @coolalanc
    @coolalanc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which region to choose for someone from India on your website?

  • @davel7336
    @davel7336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you “gift” your product to a high profile individual I wouldn’t say that person’s patronage carries the same (or actually any) kudos as a similar profile individual who’s actually chosen, sourced and paid for their PP…. I mean let’s be honest, I can’t imagine anyone actually turning it down! If “Liz” or “Vicky” (hilarious by the way) had rocked up at an AD with a bag of coins, actually with their own face on by the way, then I’d of been far more impressed 😉

  • @JoaoGomes-ce4th
    @JoaoGomes-ce4th 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Barry from Eastenders” 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Saarth_
    @Saarth_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Felt like an episode of History of Watchmaking Without Any Gaps.

  • @apoorvarya2865
    @apoorvarya2865 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can anyone send me the information of the music I begging from all the video by watchfinder and couldn't find the answer. Even Goole assistant can't find the music 😔😢

  • @adityasambhare
    @adityasambhare 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The dates are all over the place; 1851/1951, millenium and a half/century and a half, 1989/1889...

  • @gisbertvonkrauthausen5609
    @gisbertvonkrauthausen5609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good thing history turned out that way. Patek & Czapek would have sounded like a comical duo from silent movie times. A well sounding brand name cant be overestimated.

  • @fredo1070
    @fredo1070 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There was no Pope Pius XV., yet. The last Pope Pius was Pius XII, but there was a Benedict XV.

    • @MerlinsTeaboy
      @MerlinsTeaboy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a Babylon 5 reference

    • @fredo1070
      @fredo1070 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MerlinsTeaboy Cheers for pointing that out, was a bit confused.

  • @mwccpark
    @mwccpark 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:29 anybody know this models #?

  • @richardmcginnis5344
    @richardmcginnis5344 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    when i make my mark,all the watch makers are gonna want to comemorate my feat

  • @NatiiixLP
    @NatiiixLP 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is 6:08 possibly a reference to Nico Leonard and his endless rants about rappers and their iced out, and thus ruined, extremely rare watches?

  • @KeepingWatchUK
    @KeepingWatchUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Not a huge fan of the nautilus tbh, but PP’s Grand Complications are simply stunning!

  • @lancelloyd7429
    @lancelloyd7429 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good ole Lizzy and Vikki. 😂

  • @akhyarrayhka4048
    @akhyarrayhka4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why many horology marvels mostly made in swiss and not other countries is there particular reasons?

  • @redkop7909
    @redkop7909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Omega 3861 is what everyone wants to try. And it's worth it.

    • @hathaway.1166
      @hathaway.1166 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A co-axial Speedy…very nice

  • @salvaavlas5757
    @salvaavlas5757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Video of 2-3M$ value

  • @papricep6248
    @papricep6248 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:03 Are you sure this isn't a replica?

  • @antondiffering1524
    @antondiffering1524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Pope Pius XV? There wasn't one - the highest Pius (so to speak) was Pius XII, the Pope during the war. The longest reigning Pope was Pius IX -and, yes, he did have a PP. Patek was a keen member of the Zmartwycwstancy (the Congregation of the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ). The ironic thing about the Calatrava Cross that is PP's log is that it has Islamic origins. The name comes from the Arabic Q'alat Rabah (fortress of Rabah), the name of a stronghold captured from the Moors in Spain

  • @5stardave
    @5stardave 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I'm waiting for "Everything you know about Timex is a lie".

    • @FunBunChuck
      @FunBunChuck 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Timex: One simple truth,... in the world of high-end watchcraft, Timex is ranked as the single worst watch making company in the whole entire history of both the known and unknown multiverse!

    • @5stardave
      @5stardave 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FunBunChuck I guess you never saw a Daniel Wellington or Hublot?

    • @FunBunChuck
      @FunBunChuck 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@5stardave Worse than a Timex? 😱 Blasphemy!!
      Why, that's like puking on the Pope,... 🤢🤮 on purpose,... 😈

  • @damachine3
    @damachine3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love Patek Philippe. I have four in my collection and just added the new 5236 In-Line Perpetual Calendar. It's amazing. It's a first for a wristwatch in the industry. They also made the first In-Line Perpetual Calendar with the pocket watch in the '70s but this is the first in wristwatch form. You can look at a watch but you can't fully appreciate it unless you have an understanding of the history and context.

  • @andrewlawson3694
    @andrewlawson3694 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah knew all that but did you know the Pope wears his on his right wrist or does he ? Been a great week with PP thank you.

  • @ZeroSOFInfinity
    @ZeroSOFInfinity 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No. 1 is JLC.

  • @cedshred1676
    @cedshred1676 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic history! But oh boy, some very mediocre finishing in some of the macros.

  • @tandrews894
    @tandrews894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Should definitely have used a script for this video...a good number of errors made.

  • @domokun938
    @domokun938 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    th-cam.com/video/ciJ5Rlqw5wo/w-d-xo.html see 0:20 for that underhand roughness

  • @The_Angry_BeEconomist
    @The_Angry_BeEconomist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you've told this story before, but not in so many words

  • @benjamindavidovichwaals2899
    @benjamindavidovichwaals2899 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh god this video felt like champagne

  • @GODOFLIQUOR
    @GODOFLIQUOR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw another video review of this exact watch and it had the most quality control issues I’ve ever seen 💀 Only half the lume even shined

  • @TheMacanko
    @TheMacanko 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Since Czapek is polish name it should be pronounced as Chapek with "Ch" like in Champion. The name comes from the word "Czapka" which means Hat.

    • @EmJay2022
      @EmJay2022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chop-ek

    • @TheMacanko
      @TheMacanko 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@EmJay2022 Chap-ek not Chop-ek. Czopek in Polish is something completely on the other side of the human than the hat. It's an ass-plug :)

    • @EmJay2022
      @EmJay2022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheMacanko You're misunderstand. An "a" and "o" in English is pronounced differently than in Polish. In the example of Czapek the "a" sounds like an "o" in English so if you want to show an English speaker how to pronounce it properly in Polish you spell it to them like I did "chop-ek". "Chop" as in Karate chop.

    • @TheMacanko
      @TheMacanko 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EmJay2022 I must disagree. I speak both - polish and english and chop-ek doesn't reflect how it should sound. But let's leave the complexities of pronounciation and enjoy the video.

    • @EmJay2022
      @EmJay2022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheMacanko So do I. "Chap-ek" like you propose is pronounced in English like chapstick (for dry lips). This is wrong. This is not how the "a" in Czapek is pronounced if you want the correct pronunciation in English. Chop as in chopping wood is how the "a" is in Czapek. I know I'm right and you are wrong. Your explanation is going to confuse people. You are assuming a's and o's are pronounced the same in english and polish

  • @josephcarcasole6039
    @josephcarcasole6039 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The last Pope named Pius was Pius XII. There hasn't yet been a XIII, XIV, or XV.

  • @user-cu7ig6bf1x
    @user-cu7ig6bf1x 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't say that!

  • @ladosvec5478
    @ladosvec5478 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was hoping the biggest lie is the cost

  • @suic86
    @suic86 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's Czapek (like Tshapek) and not Zapek, and he was Czech and not Polish.

  • @alexbrown7665
    @alexbrown7665 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @0:18, That dot on the 10 would drive me nuts! Patek Philippe 5960/01G is a 60k+ watch. I'm surprised that made it through QC...

    • @TheWoWBane
      @TheWoWBane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's because it didn't.. this happened when Watchfinder opened it, they're notorious for it.

  • @mariushari2046
    @mariushari2046 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I almost hit the dislike button, thinking it's a clickbait thumbnail, but after listening, I really enjoyed the history lesson... and big 👍

  • @FunBunChuck
    @FunBunChuck 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this mean they're a rip-off?

  • @calvin3798
    @calvin3798 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even the exiled Dalai Lama is a watch lover and can repair watches himself. He once gifted Xi Jinping’s father an Omega watch in the 50s!

  • @gonnabeok
    @gonnabeok 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    0:21 How come this Patek-Philippe timepiece got released to the market as it's obviously imperfect - there's a dot/stain clearly visible on black 'zero' digit. That would make me uneasy even with Casio watch, let alone high-end product...

    • @tommasodeguio
      @tommasodeguio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it's dust.

    • @section85rollover
      @section85rollover 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tommasodeguio must be a BIG piece of black dust

    • @GODOFLIQUOR
      @GODOFLIQUOR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw another video review of this watch and it was way worse, the lume only shined on half of the hour markers

    • @tommasodeguio
      @tommasodeguio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GODOFLIQUOR 😬

    • @TheWoWBane
      @TheWoWBane 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's when watchfinder opens the watch...

  • @nicovandyk3856
    @nicovandyk3856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What about an in-focus about Vacheron Constantin instead of boring Rolex…
    Love your videos, thank you soo much for them!

  • @kenudo89
    @kenudo89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was wondering if hou could make a casio video I understand that amazing watches make views

  • @dzieko
    @dzieko 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Correct Polish pronunciation of "cza" in Czapek is the same as "cha" in English name "Charles".

  • @s802487
    @s802487 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 5960’s red hand is such a disappointment. I mean for a $60k watch this is such an oversight.

  • @bidipbo
    @bidipbo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "1851"

  • @14phgerard
    @14phgerard 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:04 1951

    • @Subideable
      @Subideable 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I was like “what?”

  • @gelmibson883
    @gelmibson883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I saw the bubbles on the red hand....cheapo!

  • @truebluemiata
    @truebluemiata 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So you've gone and made Rolex your number one. So predictable. I had given you more credit than that... it's positively Hodinkeesque.

  • @richardweir3342
    @richardweir3342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quality of that red hand is disappointing for a so called best manufacturer. I prefare Vacheron Constantin

  • @RealMowgzYT
    @RealMowgzYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love that American audiences will not have a clue about 2 out of 3 celebrity references 😂

  • @markdance574
    @markdance574 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And yet no mention of the fact the brand was almost sold to jlc who stupidly turned away the offer to buy the brand - sometimes the stories in these watch videos are abit like listening to your dad who tried to tell you something but doesn’t quite deliver the entire story but yet we still sit there listening until he’s finished before thinking to one’s self yea nice story dad but I already knew what you just told me and you missed afew key parts out 👍

    • @joshuaelbert6522
      @joshuaelbert6522 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm certain he mentioned this in the preceding video...

  • @morphyon
    @morphyon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This isn‘t right,… this isn‘t even wrong!

  • @tannermerrill
    @tannermerrill 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You manage to bait my click without your titles being "clickbaity"

  • @milosb1983
    @milosb1983 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seiko is number 1🤗🙏👌🏻❤️

  • @WorldsWorstFishing
    @WorldsWorstFishing 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clickbait title unbecoming of Andrews channel, anyone who has done any homework on Patek Philippe knows this basic information...c'mon man.

    • @TheSnookerGym
      @TheSnookerGym 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is not his channel

    • @WorldsWorstFishing
      @WorldsWorstFishing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheSnookerGym fair enough..the channel belongs to Richemont ultimately, the narrator and creative director is Andrew Morgan.

    • @sameagle988
      @sameagle988 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You clicked, didn’t you?

    • @WorldsWorstFishing
      @WorldsWorstFishing 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sameagle988 never like to miss an opportunity to hear Andrew's bias against Patek 👌 this (surprisingly) was one of his more factual videos free of opinion. But a stupid stupid title for anyone who is a student of horological history.

  • @BartlomiejKozera
    @BartlomiejKozera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seriously you put some knowledge and effort but showed absolute ignorance on how to pronounce "Czapek". It's so far from being correct that I hardly recognize any Polish sound in it and at the same time you have no problem with pronouncing JLC or any other well known foreign watch brand. As if lookin in google for phonetical expresssion was any problem. You know how it looks? Like Hip-Hop musican knowing nothing about watches but having 10 Rolexes teaching others what quality watch is. Not only Czapek was important historical person and formed Patek & Czapek brand but also "Czapek" brand was "reactivated" and their models are wonderful pieces of watch artisy therefore it really deserves to be pronounced correctly just like Jaeger Le-Coultre. You owe this little extra effort to community and watchmaking history.

  • @wojciechm.5737
    @wojciechm.5737 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Patek Philippe is one the most overrated brands in the industry. Most of their watches are simply average. Yes, they make nice things from the horological point of view but complicated models are often unwearable and simply ugly, less complicated models are often totally bland and has weird proportions. Finish of their watches is much below you would expect for that price.
    Look at the case of Nautilus: they had to stop the production because people didn't care about other boring and unusable Patek watches.

  • @BobbyDazzler888
    @BobbyDazzler888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sick of patek patek patek

  • @Jabber-ig3iw
    @Jabber-ig3iw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Click bait titles are getting worse, I’ve only clicked to comment and down vote. Used to really enjoy these videos. Not bothering to watch anymore, unsubscribed and channel blocked.