Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ม.ค. 2018
- Channel 4 News’ full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professor Jordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy - and a huge online following. He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book "12 Rules for Life." Subscribe: bit.ly/2mFYm8e.
She's really trying to be passive-aggressive towards a clinical psychologist.
Shows the utter lack of self-awareness of these "woke" journalists.
@@dostthouevenlogicbrethren1739 Pretty crazy, and nice profile picture.
Big mistake!
Michael G. Scott - She's a Feminist.
@@dostthouevenlogicbrethren1739 Unfortunately there's nothing passive about her aggressive demeanor. It's evident that she's engaged in a "Gotcha" contest, in which Peterson won't stoop to engage.
Jordan:The dog is a man's best friend.
Cathy: *So you're saying dogs hate women?*
Good one. This is exactly something Newman would say.
😂
Noice
I like your comment but I'm not gonna hit like because of the number of likes you have.
magyar?
Jordan: "Good morning"
Cathy: "So you're saying that all evenings are terrible?"
😂😂
Jordan: "No i'm not saying that, I never said that
@@ronroyes2375
lol
😂
"and yesterday's morning, was it not a good morning Jordan?"
“HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT..?”
“… i’m a clinical psychologist????”
Brilliant
*whole interview:*
Cathy: So you're saying that.....
Jordan: I literally never said that......
Good summary.
Jordan is too smart for her
Yes pretty much
th-cam.com/channels/lLNqr9kTEehlf7jSiSLJVg.html
sounds like my wife when we get in an argument hahaha
One of her traits certainly isn't being a good listener.
She listened quite well. Her catastrophic failure was attempting to twist his words into straw man arguments that were immediately shot down. That's the difference between an interviewer and a debater, the debater will always win because they know a straw man argument when they hear it. When someone says "So you're saying...", be prepared for a argumentative fallacy.
I suppose, if that's what you call listening. However, I feel that if she was actually listening, she wouldn't draw ridiculous conclusions and have to say, "so what you're saying is..." Or maybe she was just trying to find a reason to be triggered. Either way, what he actually says is typically very clear.
So are you saying women aren't good listeners? And that they should be happy just being low paid lobsters?
She had pre-set notions, with little to back them up. By their own professions, he listens more and she talks more. She listened for words that she thought she could use to formulate arguments against him. I agree that she she attempted to "talk over" him, and it seemed as if she wasn't listening. And yes, she was trying to "trigger" him, hence her admission of "Yes, you got me". She was basically unprepared for him, both argumentatively and factually. There's a difference between "listening" and "understanding". She didn't listen to understand, she listened for argumentative "potholes" in his words, and then attempted to tell him what he actually meant, or create arguments that had nothing to do with what he said. She's just poor debater with preconceived ideas that had no chance. She did try, I'll grant her that much.
She had to be listening very well in order to quickly attempt to twist his words and just as quickly realize that his rebuttals to her queries were sufficient enough to stop the line of questioning. But just as ctyragdoll pointed out, this was not a discussion.
Watching this again in 2024 - her prejudices, disrespect, bickering and her inability, or rather, unwillingness, to listen is still painfully striking.
She had a set goal
Absolutely. But such are too many debates with too many ideologs these days, be it about gender, pay gaps, religion, politics... doesn't matter. People are just too lazy to think and have normal conversations, generally.
So your saying... 😂
@malasc12 😂😂😂 that was my thought exactly.
Is'nt it?
Never in my 58 years, have I seen such dignity, honesty, composure and intelligence in a human being as I have witnessed in this man. He is a man among men and a true gentleman.
JP, Ben Shapiro & Robert Greene are some of the best to listen to
@@RayPenber933 Certainly not Ben Shapiro.
he's beefing with elmo
He seems very Canadian 😂😂
@@maxkho00Agree, not Ben
“So you’re saying...”
Coouge 😂👌 notice how she needs to reinvent what he says to hold an argument.
That woman needs lesson in the art of listening. She is infuriating. A producer should have slapped her and said, "Snap out of it!" A la Cher in Moonstruck
So you're saying... Repeat a paraphrase that says NOTHING that Jordan Peterson said -- hahaha!
Coouge
In a nutshell, yes. That sums up this interview and those behind her speaking through her.
She's totally a puppet.
She's womansplaining.
Cathy Newman created so many Jordan Peterson fans with this interview.
She actually did 😂 . . . . Jordan Peterson became a Global phenomenon after this Interview.
We should thank her for that
This video is what made me a fan. Seen almost all his vidz.
So, what you are going to say is, that no one on this planet knew Jordan Peterson before?
@@googlesu they did because of that law wannabe in Canada. But not as many as they do now because of Cathy's interview
Jordan’s patience is remarkable
The fact that the disagreeable, uninformed, unintelligent and deluded interviewer doesn't see that she reinforces his argument is priceless.
Jordan: Women birth 100% of babies
Cathy: so you're saying all women have to have kids
Here is yet, another example of 'Cathy' not understanding or letting Mr Peterson finishing his thought/statement! Cathy's behavior looks like, sounds like and smells like a lot of liberal Gobbledygook! Again, these people need to Close Their Mouths and open their ears.
no words, she is a rat...
Does this woman still have a job ?
@@xfiles5913 she better find something she is good at.
Azai Thou bold of you to assume that she is good at things in general
Jordan Peterson: I am a man
Cathy: So you're saying you hate women
That's what feminism means
abhishek mittal you’re degenerating it. all the assumptions she made came from statements he led. Only he was smart enough to not let them out of his mouth.
😂😂🤣
@@gjinkalla7121 He is no doubt very smart guy and a superb articulator.
But for the anchor, pin pointing every other word is not smartness that the anchor was doing
@@gjinkalla7121 No, all of the assumptions she made were leaps in logic. Using logical fallacy in a recorded debate is what makes her look unintelligent.
It seems like you weren't able to understand anything JP said just like the reporter. He isn't arguing based on opinions, he uses purely factual arguments.
„I‘m very, very, very careful with my words“ - „so you say i don‘t listen to what you said?“ - „yes“.
I watch this interview once in a while to remind myself what true eloquence sounds like.
she is basically losing an argument with herself
It's called playing the devils advocate! A very useful tool :)
@@Glacialvoid devils advocate is when you argue a fifferent or opposing argument to the one that is being debated. It is not when you reconstruct the oppositions words and pervert their meaning.
The worst part is that she knows she is misinterpreting him, and it is clear in her tone of voice that she is acting/pretending. She is not being honest, and her whole being knows this ....but she is doing her best to conceal it. She is lying, and thats what makes this interview so embarrassing.
@@lightsoutlena To be truthful, to be an effective devils advocate, you can "pervert" the words in any way you want as long as the meaning is retained. Especially if the perversion leads to the questions being as emotional as possible. Im not at all saying this to defend her, in fact her perversion does go too far, any journalist shouldnt interpret anything beyond trying to understand the essence of something. Journalists SHOULDNT play the devils advocate. I am just saying, that this does give us something positive. Jp is really good at shutting things like that down, and they're both helping us to do that ourselves.
@@Glacialvoid i can appreciate that.
lena trackburn yup, there’s a term for that. The strawman argument.
I’m surprised his jaw didn’t break from the amount of words she was trying to put in his mouth
Good one dude. But no for real, it's honeslty so pathetic, it made me so mad
I'm not super into Jordan Peterson, I mainly watched this video out of curiosity. You could fill a book with the words she put into his mouth. God awful "journalism".
Unbelievable!
thedrizzle313 exactly. I found myself on many occasions saying” that is not it all what he said, lady”
thedrizzle313 Exactly! I found myself on many occasions saying” that is not at all what he said”, lady.
I love when she says she isn't very agreeable not knowing that it just proves Peterson's point and he laughs so hard knowing that.
One of the greatest interviews ever. Every time TH-cam suggests it, I spend the half-hour to watch it again.
It's been at least 4 times for me.
She’s trying so hard to misinterpret his words that it become annoying.
It’s quite a well known debate technique. She just miserably fails at doing it correctly.
Let me offend the “laydees” for ya. But that’s what women do 🥴
@@bj1783 you’re no Jordan Peterson. 😄
Straw men
@Patrick J Mims nice 👍
- "so you're saying that..."
- " no I'm not..."
And that goes on 100 more times
I feel bad for Jordan here. The host is clearly looking for a dramatic angle to push on, and he's not giving her one. "Are you saying that..." "No I'm saying.." Over and over and over.
Tenkos Came here to say just that.
Peterson: facts facts facts Interviewer: so, you're a sexist bigot racist then? Next question. XD
Lol perfect summary of the interview. This is one of those women who think being belligerent and bitchy is strong and intelligent. WRONG
Someone should remind Cathy this tactic is also known as lying
Hey Cathy, 6 years later, I was shopping for bicycle helmets and I couldn’t help but notice that both the blue and pink versions were the same price.. 19:00
The "pink tax" was a desperate myth. You can still find it, look at deodorants for men and deodorants for women. Probably the one for women will be more expensive. Here is where the feminist brain stop working and they say it is inequality, discrimination, "pink tax" and so on, but if you actually pick up one of each products and look at the contents, you'll quickly find that the product for women is of higher quality and/or contains better ingredients. If we think a bit further then we quickly realize that men and women have different skin. Men have thicker skin, literally, and their skin is not as sensitive. This is why you find "5 in 1" hygiene products for men, because their skin can take it. On the opposing side, you have women who have 5 different products for their skin.
There is no pink tax, there is only men and women and their own choices. And women dominate the market.
Lol
So you're saying we have finally achieved equality 😅
So which one did you buy?
@@user-ej4ip9el1w pink of course
I'm a woman and I'm glad you are encouraging men!! They need it also. I love listening to you.
Me too. At the end of the day men who listen, take the encouragement seriously and work on themselves are quality men. And we need them...if you ask me, this man here is a TRUE feminist as he works on improving the men we will spend our lives with....and believe me, I used to be one of the girls saying stuff like "if i ever get pregnant and it's a boy, I'll abort it" back when I was like 20-22 because all the men I had come across, including my father were trashy people...and then I met my husband and a son that takes after him would be the biggest blessing. So we do need better men, and we also need to recognise and appreciate them when we do come across them. Or at least some of us do, dear modern day feminists don't come for me. 😂
I like cats.
'So you're saying we should kill dogs?'
haha great.
Yes, that sums up the theme of the 'interview' perfectly.
Lol😂😂😂
Fucking thank you
so youre saying that dogs and cats get more privilege than other animalss?
Jordan Peterson: *exists*
Cathy: So you’re saying dead people are irrelevant
Underrated
Goated comment
Underrated
I completely disagree with this statement. Cathy would more likely say something along the lines of "So you’re saying dead Women are irrelevant?"
@@Caspricocious 😂😂😂😂
This is why listening and hearing are two different things
Cathy: You're making vast generalizations.
Jordan: I'm a clinical psychologist.
That made me laugh way too hard.
I remember watching this live and fell out of my chair laughing at that part, too. It's still hilarious!
not a logical response by Peterson
@@drdrdrfloydhow so?
@@drdrdrfloydhe’s saying that he’s going by the clinical literature
@@TheJohnCooperShow I know what he is saying. And as a clinician and clinical researcher, I know (a) that he is overstating his opinion as objective, and (b) that he is wrong and a liar. Moreover, as a matter of objective fact: his opinions about - any - given population or individual are arbitrary and intuition-based, and those opinions are not - whatsoever - generalizable to any population or other individual. (Setting aside that fraudsters like Peterson do generalize, beyond the immediate patient, the fraudster's arbitrary and intuition-based opinions.)
That the opinions of the Jordan Petersons of the world are arbitrary and intuition-based is common knowledge among Peterson's big brothers in psychiatry. Evidence of this includes, for example, statements by neuroscientist and psychiatrist Dr. Thomas R. Insel, and psychologist Dr. Joshua J. Chauvin, in their 2018 journal article, "Building the Thermometer for Mental Health." That is available for free through the National Library of Medicine.
--Dr. Dr. Dr. Floyd
Jordan: "There are starving people everywhere."
Cathy: "So you're saying that women belong in the kitchen."
😂😂😂😂
Lol
Hilarious 😂🤣
This wins😂
Precisely this😂😂
Jordan-“The sky is blue”
Cathy-“so you’re saying sunsets don’t exist?”
It's hard to watch, but damn I keep coming back to this shitshow
Actually, that is a valid argument. The sky is not always blue, the wind doesn't always blow, and the grass doesn't always grow. But I see what you mean: this interviewer was definitely looking for a confrontation.
@@BigBri550 but he didn't specify the "always". He might've meant "now", which could be more or less likely depending on the context - if you're discussing the weather for example.
@@simeonstoyanov5226 Well, the OP is a characterization anyway, but here’s how it works: “The sky is blue” is an absolute statement even lacking the word “always.” So if Cathy were to retort, “So you’re saying sunsets don’t exist,” she’s not exactly wrong. If an absolute statement can be interpreted as exclusionary, it is invalid unless it happens to be true under all circumstances. To conclude otherwise is assumptive.
😂 yeah, just like that
Jordan: The truth is cruel
Cathy: So your're saying everybody should be a liar?
man, this right here is truly a hood classic.
no one wants that ratchetness here
Jordan: im straight.
Her: so you hate gay people?
Pretty much the logic used in the homosexual agenda.
Can’t believe they aired this lol I’m so glad they did 😂
@Adolf Hitler Everybody is equal under the Law/Constitution.
Any additional laws specifically for some groups of people are just special privileges, which creates the very thing you guys are supposedly fighting against, which is inequality.
@Adolf Hitler Radical left have agenda
@@texeltexel2009 Hear, hear!
Peterson: Breathes
Interviewer: so you’re saying you hate women!
This made me laugh thank you.
It doesn't matter what you are saying
I love that she asks "don't you just stir people into an angry frenzy?" The perfect response would be, "no...that's just you."
You ever notice how the individual who is wrong in and argument/debate is always the one who interrupts? Shes following an agenda here, peterson is simply revealing the conversion for what it is, yet she wont let that happen by interrupting with " so what you're saying..." follwed by some abstract mis-interpretation of his words.
She rephrased what he stated so many times it's a wonder he was on this program at all. She kept seeing the phantoms in her mind and trying to build a narrative that is unsupported by reality.
Cathy, you are a BULLY! You just keep interrupting JP and trying to put words in his mouth but he’s doing a good job! You go, JP!!
Jordan Petersons patience in this interviw is beautiful to behold. He is clearly very intelligent, calm, a fantastic listener, well informed..... what a brilliant man. This restores my faith that there are genuine, kind, good hearted, hard working, people in the world. We all benefit massively from their endevours. A bright star in a dark sky!
Kathy just increased pay gap to 12%.
Lol
Brilliant lol
No doubt lol
@rumpleforeskin73 good reasoning. Besides, she seems to be blaming him for everything that is wrong and demanding him to justify history facts!!! Making him responsible for crisis everywhere!! How silly!!, as he said!!!.
@rumpleforeskin73 she isn't very bright
Jordan: *pauses to breathe*
Cathy: "So you're ignoring me now."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
😂😂😂
😄😄😄
Jordan : no
Cathy- so you're saying YES?!
😂😂😂
What I love about this conversation is that it's a manifestation of everything Dr Peterson talks about. Talking the high road is the path to victory. She spits continuous venom from her forked tongue, and most of us would fall prey to it. Either letting it defeat us or fighting it back. Peterson assumes good will the entire time, despite receiving everything but. Death to legacy media a.k.a state propaganda.
Swede here. I am a male and an engineer. My grandfather was an engineer. My mom is a nurse, my sister is a nurse, my grandmother was a nurse, my cousin (female) is a nurse and so is her mother
Jordan : **breathes**
Cathy : *SO YOU'RE SAYING..*
Yeah this is a good one
"So you are saying" introduce straw man argument here.
A perfect example of putting words in someones mouth. He handled every response with such skill and intelligence, I would love to chat with him for a while. He can articulate and express his ideas succinctly and clearly. Total bro-mance right now! LOL
@Joe Arguin Yes, many were angered, including me, but she did it so many times, with almost every question, that it became comical and exposed her as a fraud for trying to debate with logical fallacies not giving a genuine interview.
@Joe Arguin I guess she is used to putting stuff in her mouth she figured she would try it on someone else.
Jordan: *comes dressed in suit
Cathy: So you're mocking poor minorities who can't afford suit?
I'm so grateful that Channel 4 never turned off the comments for this.
Feminism is Cancer.
Feminism is worse than cancer. It's hate, distilled into a childishly aggressive ideology, directed towards 50% of the human population, in an oversimplistic bid for power. This is truly the misguided basis for the ideological ignorance that led to the most horrifying events of the 20th century, and more deaths than cancer caused in the same time frame.
She might as well have led with the question, "When did you stop beating your wife?" Or children, or slaves, etc.
@@iamyouarei9497 👌👌👌
I find myself coming back to this often; a slurp of cool water while wandering through a hot and dusty plain.
peterson claims the hierarchies of capitalism are based on competence.
he is demonstrably WRONG.
the hierarchies of capitalism are /\ pyramid shaped, while every natural hierarchy of competence is a bell curve, with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE.
/\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy.
capitalism is UNNATURAL and abusive because of that fact.
@@bomination. I’m not taking the time to go through it all in yt comments, but you’re wildly incorrect. Concentrated accumulation of resources is ubiquitous throughout the natural world, and thank goodness capitalism helps the middle and lower classes at the same time.
@@Susgod_Hyperflex firstly that's not true about the natural world, secondly even if it was , aren't humans meant to be better than beasts of the field ?
6 years later... It's a classic by now. I'm watching it for n-th time and I'm amazed how precise and eloquent he is, in a hostile environment. Especially that, as he said later, she was quite friendly before the recording started.
On other hand, it's amazing how she keeps doing the same thing for a half of an hour, not seeing that it doesn't work at all and she's basically discredits herself.
"So you're saying..."
"So what you're trying to say is..."
"You're just saying.."
She just isn't listening.
Yh I think it’s because Jordan is so smart she has to dumb his words down to understand
Honestly, it seems more like a case of an extreme debater mind that has zero willingness to concede, almost as if she is trying to prove a point like their life depends on it. As a result of this mindset, she attacks ever single word that he is saying and attempts to construe it in a way that portrays him and his argument in the worst way possible. From my experience in sanctioned debates in school as well as adjudication from said debates, both in my school and other, her ability to honestly reason in a way that deduces common themes is absolutely pathetic. She would barely survive people in year 7-8 in terms of ability.
Are you saying a comet will hit this planet at noon??
Yeah, but I think she does a great job of criticizing Jordan - and I think he mentions it that she does a great job of not being afraid to offend him in search of the truth.
I think the segment starts at about 22:14
@@MrMeszaros the problem is I don't think she was looking for the truth. at least not willing to let it be what it is. she had a conclusion she wanted to reach and she had to try to get him to go along with it. people do this all the time in politics. the give away is nearly always a bunch of questions involving "what you're saying is" and then an intentionally disingenuous statement. politicians do it for votes, news anchors do it for ratings. this is why youtubers like Joe Rogan, Uncommon Knowledge, Russell Brand and the like do so well. they ask questions and follow where they lead, they don't try to steer the answers.
"So you are saying this thing that you have never said" ~Interviewer
Perfect summary of this whole half hour
fucking funny haha
over and over again ... shes not very bright, and shes bitter, _and_ shes 'on a mission' the dizzy blonde. >_
That sums it up, what a horrible interviewer talk about someone that got their job because of gender not merit.
Exactly what i was thinking. Peterson is way too smart for this lady though
I just noticed, upon watching this for like the 5th time, that the MOMENT Jordan mentions the real world positives he has made in people's lives, she abruptly ends the interview.
You could say it's because of time constraints but it's oddly weird that she doesn't even acknowledge his statement.
JP was at his best in this interview, she tried so many times to put him in a box and JP just wiggled out like a master.
“I’m very very careful with my words” - Jordan Peterson
“Well I’m not” - Cathy Newman
You didn't have to say that, sweetheart. It was just so obvious - me
that's why I love the comment section 😂
That was his warning to her...but she didn't realise and got had later on. BOOM!
Sums it up
This comment section keeps giving and giving, even after two years. So satisfying, lol.
notice how he answers all her questions and she ignores all of his
Exactly.
typical toxic feminist
That's a women attitude for you I always see that in my house!
He is the one being interviewed.
@@rhydianc7502 Yeah but taking questions from an interviewer who is constantly getting things wrong is difficult, so he corrects her and tries to help her understand with questions to her.
I believe this man is genuine and and valuable. I benefit from him. He makes sense of what’s going on in this crazy world. I hope he stays in good health.
Took a 🥃 every time she said "so what you're saying is" 🥂
Edit: I just got out of a alcohol induced coma.
Me: i play fotball
Her: so you are saying girls cant play sport
Lol
But theres one thing tho girls arent video games.
Girls can play sports Foxy Boxing WWE Bra and pantie fights
jan_teigen_ lol
@@huskiehuskerson5300 To₹
Does it bother you that the male restrooms is predominantly used by only males?
why doesn't this comment have more likes
In France, public restrooms are used by both.
So your saying it doesn't bother you that male bathrooms are sexist towards females. Females can't enter the bathroom. That seems pretty unfair.
Rishi Sivakumar Good one!
I have noticed female toilets at malls are predominantly closer than male toilets.
I look back on this interview like the death of legacy media. Time has done nothing but solidify that in my head. RIP
In no particular order:
1. too agreeable
2. choice of profession
3. Work less hours
4. takes more time off
A few more I can't recall right now.
Willingness to take on work further from home and take on more dangerous work.
Having children . Being a traditional wife that want to take more care of their children so less hours
Cathy: Would you like a salad?
JP: Well, what's in it?
Cathy: So you're saying we should ban vegetables.
Murad Babaniyazov 😂😂😂😂
I really like this comment. It really described and gave a summary the whole debate. 😂
JP: No, I did not say that at all, I merely asked what was in it?
@@LTG22 so you're saying that women should just stay at home looking after their miserable children?
@@jamesf8864 No, I merely was curious of the contents of the salad.
Jordan Peterson: Yes
Kathey Newman: So what your'e saying is no.
And that's sexist, isn't it?
😂😭
@@schlimmbotg472 Patriarchal tyranny, in fact 😂
🤣🤣🤣
@@schlimmbotg472 obviously, everything a man does is sexist. They slowly want to criminalize having xy chromosome
Loved this interview 6 years ago and just rewatched it.
Plenty of “Aren’t you just”, “So what you’re saying is”, “So you’re not going to”…
it isn't over yet
Its incredible that everytime he answered in a way she didn't like that didn't fit her view point she either pivoted completely away or tried to force her words into his mouth. Its the same thing Piers Morgan does and its all because the questions themselves aren't important to the interviews its all about getting a reaction as they believe it makes more money
I watch this quite often, just to remind myself of how not to be an idiot.
You know, I don't particularly gush and fall over myself repeating "Oh, Jordan, Jordan, you're SO smart" but you know, compared to most people I've seen/met/married/argued with/listened to, this guy has a fucking neuron or two actually fucking firing somewhere deep in the recesses of his anterior cingulate medullary fomentum-you know, actually *demonstrating* the oft-trumpeted claim that human beings at some point diverged from the apes, UNLIKE around ninety-nine point nine percent of the tetrapod-like organisms that come under the designation "humanity".
😅
@@kamakirinoko it would amuse me to have a clip of you voicing this comment in person included at the end of this video footage.
@@kamakirinoko Your comment regenerated my dead brain cells :))))
@@grillGrilla Tee hee; I would be hilariously happy to oblige. Each and every single day I am struck with the realization that the vast, VAST majority of human beings have only the vaguest notions of the existence of modes of thought about science, history, the sum of human knowledge up to this point or really, ANYTHING AT ALL beyond their Facebook pages and the latest engrossing conspiracy theory. That's when they're rationalizing why they shouldn't vaccinate their kids, if indeed you can dignify the term as "rationalizing."
Jordan: inhales
Cathy: “So you’re saying we should tax people for oxygen?”
lol!
Hahahaha
“So your saying...” “You mean...” “But you just said...”
HAHA BEST ONE!
Yes 😹😹😹
back when i first saw this in college it was around 4 million views. nice to see its closing to 50 million views now!
I’ve never seen someone try so hard to get someone to sabotage themselves. No conversation was had here. It’s mildly entertaining for how good that guy is at deflecting all of the attacks. He’s like an athlete. It’s like watching the world’s best goalie.
Does she truly not understand ANYTHING he’s saying?!
She's just a feminist propagandist.
when she had that moment of enlightenment that her right of free speech could upset someone and that it still is a right you gotta defend, i knew she has to be plain stupid. i mean it even took her a while to wrap her head around that thought.
I suppose, she doesn't want to
@@INFINITY_99 If you answer the question why she doesn't want to understand him, it'll lead you to the point where she has to be stupid. She got a fundamentalists few of gender inequality. Fundamentalism per se means that one has to be stupid, because it means that you are aiming for that one and only simple answer about a certain thing, not allowing any other answers. Fundamentalism is a way to avoid thinking. I don't know how that isn't stupid.
@@biedl86 You seem very preoccupied and judging. I definitely see your point. However, I will not support your in accusing her to be stupid - that would be overhasty. The central problem is that she stands in for a viewpoint that is very extreme and that can be refuted quite easily to some extent. That's the reason why Jordan Peterson smashes her in this debate. She just doesn't have clear evidence that supports her thesis and, on top of that, her strategy wasn't thought out so well. This doesn't change the point I am making right now, though. You shouldn't be so fast in judging someone.
Peterson: "Well.."
Cathy: "So you're saying tap water is inferior?"
😂😂
lol..😂
underrated comment
this is the best one of all...an elegant pun is always wellcome.
😂😂😂
I come back and watch this every now and then to see how calmly and easily JP dismantles every single point she thought she had. Cathy is regarded as one of the UK's top interviewers but her own personal biases and agenda was startlingly clear here.
She’s completely not listening and misinterpreting every single word he says.
Jordan: I’m hungry
Cathy: so you’re saying I should go make you a sandwich?
Edit: hail lobster 🦞
Yes, and it’s Sammich.
Damn right I am!
Correct spelling would be: sammich
sudo make me a sandwich
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Cathy: Do you secretly hate women?
Jordan: of course not, that’s an absurd question.
Cathy: so you’re saying that women consistently ask foolish questions?
haahahaha
😄
in all fairness, they do
[...]
Cathy: so you’re saying that women consistently ask foolish questions?
Jordan: only when that woman is you.
😂
This really aged well. Could be the number one income generator of channel 4 on youtube.
She could potentially be one of the most incompetent journalists I have ever seen, she twisted every single thing Jordan said, and apparently she was 'listening' to what he was saying....
"What gives you the right to say that?"
"I'm a clinical psychologist"
steve rapatas 😂 best line
Man I died when he said that xD
HeadShoot, LOL!!!!
Biggest mic drop...
OHHHHHH! *Guy falls forward, hands on face, eyes rolled back and jaw wide open.
Jordan:
Cathy: So you are saying women can't be silent?
I laughed so hard at this comment
Funniest comment here
Best one so far
😂
Made my day.
Yes, women do want their men to be powerful and strong chrachters. This is true
like who wouldnt, why the fk is she even trying to argue with that? Like wtf
The amount of words she tried to put in his mouth is absolutely astounding. He caught her every time though,
I know it wasn't her point, but this interview made me instantly pre-order his book.
I just ordered it too!
Cubeologist same!!
I got it on Audible. If you enjoy listening to Dr Peterson talk, it's like a 15hour podcast lol
Added to the wishlist. It was great to watch him school Channel 4 news.
Just waiting for my next credit to come in and I'm all over this.
"So why should women put up with facts?"
basically all she said
They haven't for a long time and look what's happened. Rampant depression and substance abuse. Turns out being too agreeable to toxic societal norms ain't such a good idea!
So what you're saying is "all women are too dumb to deal with facts ?"
is that what you're saying ?
S O W H A T Y O U ' R E S A Y I N G I S
lol
There is a real feminist view here check this out... th-cam.com/video/J7GWHgVZJQU/w-d-xo.html
"In order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive"
Jordan Peterson
"so what you're saying *insert the complete opposite of what he was actually saying*"
so true, well spotted.
I'm sure she's partially doing it for the sake of the viewers. Don't you think this interview would be boring if she didn't get J. Peterson to elaborate his point in a way that the average viewers can get? It also helps him to debunk his detractors.
Mark Campling not really it’s very obvious
Fributes Very typical move for feminists
Folks keep getting mad at Newman here, but Petersen uses implications in the things he's saying to communicate a lot of stuff indirectly. And he's doing it on purpose.
It's a very manipulative tactic, one that works really well against someone who isn't prepared for that.
Jordan Peterson: I'm a therapist.
Cathy: so you're saying you're the rapist??
Brothers grimsby
Haha. That made me laugh
OMFG
Rape means a lot of things these days. If you tighten the pickle jar too tight your wife might scream "oh my God, you're raping me!"
Ahahahaha
The most insane question she asked was. “Why should your freedom of speech trump the right of someone not being offended.” She literally just called not being offended a right. This has to he the most frustrating interviewer ive ever seen.
Does the interviewer ever once listen and then elaborate on his response?? Her sole intent was to paint Mr. Peterson into corners fictitiously concocted. His patience is off the charts and he easily worked his way through her attempted minefield. I would say that the interviewer and the media outlet should be ridiculed for their attempt to smear, but they only succeeded in further acknowledging a true cultural Rock Star!! Thank you Mr. Peterson. The world is a far better place due to your efforts. Salute!!
He did, but imagine people speaking like this to you all the time. Man i wouldnt be able to take it and i think many people do talk like that to him. It has to be so tiring honnestly, i would feel really bad.
Jordan: 'According to statistical analysis, women prefer...'
Cathy: 'That's a vast generalisation'
Says the woman who kept trying to sum up everything he said in a nice neat generalization.
it's funny that she was like "ThAt WaS a VasT gENreALizatioN"
and in the same interview say "your followers harras and bully people"
She needs to stop telling him what he's
Saying and actually listen to what he's saying.
@@crybabyfans3162 and you need to realize that journalism isn't about that, that's just an intelligent and respectable thing to do
@@goncalobaia1574 ofc i already know that but she's just making the conversation harder than it has to be
Jordan: I’m hungry
Cathy: So you’re saying women should make you a sandwich?
Jordan: im human
Cathy: so ur saying women aren't?
Yes please and while she makes him one she can make another one for me
According to bull burr yes 🤣🤣🤣
@@iliarumenov3088 she'll make it wrong trust me
Jordan: "I like the Batman Animated Series"
Cathy: "So you're saying that women should get back in the kitchen?"
This will be watched til the end of time.
I love the arguments this guy is giving to the interviewer. The female interviewer is not grasping the point. She keeps trying to twist his words. What he said is crystal clear to me. The gap between men and women doesn't depend solely on gender; it's a culmination of various factors. Why is it so hard to understand that? Moreover, it's annoying when she wrongly interprets and rephrases what he said. Anyone who has studied physics, chemistry, or anything that cannot be uniquely defined by one thing, such as a formula with several variables-major components of nature and society-should understand that the gap between genders is not attributable to one factor alone.
This
So you are saying.....
LOL
she did that atleast 10 times
color morale 37 times.
Vincent Rodriguez you're joking
Womansplaining at its finest.
Jordan: I'm straight
Cathy: So you're saying people shouldn't be gay?
Why are you gay?
Your profile picture made this comment really funny haha
Well, people shouldn't be but they are
Lol 😂
@@marioellersiek6917 Are you trying to be smart, because we both know that he was making a joke just like all the other comments.
She was clearly there for an argument and not an interview.
I've never seen a woman be so disagreeable as a reporter
Let's break down this interview;
49% Peterson explaining what he means
50% Peterson being told what he means by an the interviewer who misconstrues every point.
1% Questions
"I haven't seen this many strawmen since Wizard of Oz"
But the Wizard of Oz only had one strawman.... I have a feeling your comment made more sense in your head before you actually typed it out...
welcome to channel 4
You forgot the 9% pay gap.
so 49% is mansplaining...LOL
She did a good job of representing how mainstream ideologues would interpret what he is saying, and by doing that, gives Peterson a chance to respond to those interpretations.
Jordan: “How’s your day?”
Cathy: “so you’re saying that women must answer to men at all times.”
HAHAH
It’s not just Cathy that thinks that
My god, what an annoying and rude host. I've no idea why he didn't use her weapons against her and called her out for trying to put words into his mouth. I also wished he persisted with the question when he asked her about her success and what it took. She knew where this would go to and this is why she persisted with other questions. I dislike he followed her along that path. Overall, a very intelligent, well-read and controlled man. Big respect.
I love this interview, I could watch it a hundred times :)
So you are saying that I got destroyed in my own show?
@roger gerritsen yeah please let me know which show xD
FINALLY.. Yes.. you got one right cause all of your other (So you are saying) was like, like... you were talking to someone else.... Your replies were not even part of the same conversation.. Then this.. YES you got totally owned and thrown away on your own show.
"Power is Competence" is a profoundly beautiful statement.
@@liamream9029 it is indeed. There are many times people have power without competance.
I think the thing that really pisses me off is her inability to comprehend what he's saying. She, mistakenly, decided before they met who he was and what he stood for and no matter how many times he corrected her she still kept to her initial narrative.
His Patience: Ninja level.
monk level
or sniper level
More like God level.
Canadian level*
Funny
How did he not get up and walk out ?!?!?! 😮
“If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.”
This interview is frankly, abusive. Were their genders reversed this would be completely unacceptable.
i'm starting to think presenters from channel 4 are all incompetent.
If it was reversed the woman would run out crying in the first minutes
@@neuroleptika depends on the woman
@@nickk4125 Someone with a brain! such a rare sight indeed.
Don't worry he can hold his own....no need to get angry for him....smile move on