Canon EOS R5 Review & Sample Images by Ken Rockwell

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • Canon EOS R5 Review & Sample Images by Ken Rockwell
    I got mine at www.bhphotovid...
    Written Review & Sample Image Files www.kenrockwel...
    R5 vs R6 • Canon EOS R6 Review & ...
    R5 User Guide www.kenrockwel...
    I'd also get it at www.adorama.co...
    or amzn.to/34uYdfp
    or www.crutchfiel...
    or used at www.ebay.com/s...
    When you click on the links above to various merchants and make a purchase, this can result in me earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
    EF 50mm f/1.0 Review www.kenrockwel...
    RF Lens Reviews www.kenrockwel...
    Sony 12-24mm Stabilization FAILURE www.kenrockwel...
    USB-C PD Chargers amzn.to/2Ny9z7O
    Watson LP-E6N battery www.bhphotovid...
    I get all my gear at www.kenrockwel...
    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
    Contribute at www.paypal.me/...
    Mystery Text: SCM660, F8, +50, AUDP -36 @ 2.0, 1 mS attack, 46 mS release, MP 9r6, LMT -1.0.
    Ken Rockwell® is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

ความคิดเห็น • 419

  • @shonen84
    @shonen84 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Been visiting the website for decades, didn’t know papa Ken had a TH-cam channel. Wonderful review, refreshing that he starts with pictures and then focuses on stuff that actually matters - ergonomics and personal reflections on features when in-use. I have similar experiences with my R5, very happy with it!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yip. Thanks!!!!!!!!

    • @d3xmeister
      @d3xmeister 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      shonen84 I agree,Ken’s style is pure gold in my opinion, I and so many other got so much priceless info from him over the years. God bless you, Ken

    • @airi6591
      @airi6591 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ditto! Fab website and now a fab TH-cam channel. What a great range of picture examples. A moon shot thrown in as well - truly awesome!

    • @pedrokozlakowski6440
      @pedrokozlakowski6440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      same here. Ken is THE man.

  • @J0hnny8ravo
    @J0hnny8ravo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    “big american hands” 😂 Everything is big out there... cars, wives, even the kids are big!

    • @nickfanzo
      @nickfanzo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Johnny Bravo damn right

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      As we say, Go big or go home. Thanks!

    • @intelgen7860
      @intelgen7860 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Then why are most of your actors or high profile people midgets. America's f*d in as many ways as it might be superior to SOME countries. Australia is a much better country and we don't all have 20 guns up our sleeves at all times. 'Big' heads and tourist attractions might be what you're referring to so have fun with that once you're shitty present starts a war with every country on earth. I don't think there will be an America sometime in the near future. Just a crater. Also you're very biased to Canon, Sony is superior for video.

    • @steffenrosmus1864
      @steffenrosmus1864 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      One Texan told me some years ago it tooks him 2 days to drive around his land by car. My answer: yep once had a car that slow too. Could you imagine his face??

    • @slayagec9070
      @slayagec9070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@steffenrosmus1864 haha savage

  • @wheeledpursuits
    @wheeledpursuits 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I am so glad to find you on TH-cam, Ken. I vividly remember how I was directed to your review website, by my mentors, when I started my photography journey a little over decade ago. Since then every gear purchase has had to mandatorily go through your views before I emptied my wallet. Incidentally, now when I am struggling to make the purchase decision on R5, I bumped into your channel here - pleasantly surprised 😊! Thank you for your excellent review, as always!!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks! See the full review at www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm my R6 is on its way; should be about the same for less money www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r6.htm

  • @paulsebring5326
    @paulsebring5326 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like your review but you come off pretty biased.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Of course I’m biased, I’ve been shooting a long time a d have my preferences based on what actually works well. Thanks!

    • @paulsebring5326
      @paulsebring5326 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV respect!

  • @dwm_hc
    @dwm_hc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I've been reading your reviews for twenty years - first time I've seen one of your videos. I appreciate your take. I've watched a wide array of R5 videos over the past couple weeks, and your review is distinct and helpful.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks Douglas!

    • @sandramuncelli7976
      @sandramuncelli7976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like and have followed Ken for years, but he must be getting paid for by Canon, as he is outright lying and completely distorting everything he can think of related to the R5, and literally making things up about the new SONY. I have a 5DSR, a 1DXII and two C300M2’s. However, probably because Canon started the mirrorless race 4 years later than SONY and is now very obviously afraid to have the R5 take market share away from their videography cameras, they have aborted several critical features and competely botched others. No secure redundant dual cards, even though it has two slots. That alone makes it too risky to use when there are plenty of better options that do provide that. Pretty much all pro options for the past several years. A hard stop 30 minute recording limit, with a 2-3 hour “recover time” during which it is a brick- I mean come on... 8K+ is mostly used for long form interview on journalism, but this camera will not give you much more than 10 minutes (if you are lucky) after setup. It’s stills are great, but again, no secure, redundant storage. For anyone who has ever lost a shot due to SD failure (over 50% of photogs, and 70% of working pro’s) that is just asking for failure.
      Meanwhile he lied about everything he could think about related to the A7S3, which all over the Web by people who were loaned the camera, as well as people they then loaned it to, both SONY users and haters are calling it the best video camera ever produced- pretty much at any price.
      Like I said, he must be getting paid or gear from Canon...

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sandra Muncelli Hi Sandra, nope; Canon doesn’t send me anything. I just love their stuff. Remember that I’m an artist making work to hang on gallery walls. I’ve never used anything Canon for video as you are. I spent ten years in Hollywood; if I’m shooting a motion picture, I’m renting Panavison or Arri. Thanks!

    • @dwm_hc
      @dwm_hc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sandramuncelli7976 I'm not sure that your argument is made more persuasive by questioning the character and scruples of Mr. Rockwell. Nor does it convince me that you like him.
      Certainly, if I want a commercial videographers take of the R5, I would have watched (and in fact have watched) someone other than Mr. Rockwell, who I primarily know as a knowledgable stills photographer from his extensive work done over the decades on his website. If you'd like to read more, you can find him at the following link.
      www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm

    • @sandramuncelli7976
      @sandramuncelli7976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dwm_hc - You are so correct! But then again, Ken Rockwell is one of the more despised people in the industry by photographers, stores and educators alike, so I am in good company for sure! anotherangle.eu/posts/why-ken-rockwell-is-bad-for-photography/

  • @parmanduke
    @parmanduke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Dollar-for-dollar, the Sony A7 III is the world's best full-frame mirrorless camera ever created"
    "The Sony A7R III is the best mirrorless camera ever introduced for consumer photography"
    "If you demand the highest possible resolution in a mirrorless camera, this is it. The A7R IV can't be beat for technical image quality"
    Your comments Ken. So fickle

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly. I wrote that in the previous decade in 2018, when that was true. Today in 2020 the Canon EOS RP is better for half the price. Things change and I change with them. Thanks!

    • @parmanduke
      @parmanduke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@KenRockwellTV I got the RP and sent it back first week. Felt so so cheap. A7iii is way better. It's not even close. Come on you gotta be kidding. Lmao. I agree that the R5 is an awesome camera. No doubt whatsoever. But your modus operandi is sing high praises about a camera and then blast it not long after. Wow you just lost all credibility with me after the RP comment. I shot the RP with both RF 24 105s. It takes great pics but in no way shape or form is it anywhere near the A7iii. You took some magnificent pics with the top Sony cameras. It looks just like the ones you got with the R5.

    • @parmanduke
      @parmanduke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KenRockwellTV AND when the A7 iv and A7 R5 comes out it'l be the next "best ever" and then you'll slam the R5. And then then when the R5ii comes out Yada yada.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As I keep saying, the camera doesn’t matter. I make the same pictures regardless www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm

    • @parmanduke
      @parmanduke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KenRockwellTV So true. From my perspective the photos you got from the D850 are some of the best photos you have ever presented on your website. Guys like you can produce magic from any camera. But wow your D850 photos are breathtaking. No need for a $3800 overheating camera with overpriced lenses.

  • @lintonhawes1311
    @lintonhawes1311 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mate this is not better then a a9 mark 2

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s right, the Canon EOS R9 is way better than the old Sony A9 II from 2019. Thanks!

    • @lintonhawes1311
      @lintonhawes1311 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KenRockwellTV mate that makes not sense whatsoever!

  • @StephanieLaerkeAndersen
    @StephanieLaerkeAndersen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Another lovely video by Ken Rockwell. Apart from looking at the fantastic images that cameras produce these days, I also love looking Ken’s many pictures of the state of California because I live in Yorkshire, an ancient historical and beautiful county in ancient England in Europe which is an often rather cold country. We have a maritime climate here although just recently it’s been extremely hot and for many months. However, the Californian climate would suit me perfectly. The Spanish styled architecture is truly stunning. I love those deep blue skies, the hills, the desert, the tall palm trees, first planted by Spanish Franciscan and Jesuit missionaries in 1769. Thank you, Ken for the review. Like I’ve said before I’m coming to California at some point! Maybe I should change my camera for my visit? I remember you saying that Fuji cameras seem to be stuck on permanent portrait mode, so I need something a little bit different. Before anyone jumps down my throat, I know this is a video about the Canon EOS R5 and not a Fuji camera. I was just having a ramble...

  • @paulgill3785
    @paulgill3785 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Brilliant review of a brilliant Canon camera.

  • @TW-iu9zy
    @TW-iu9zy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ... R5, best mirrorless camera? 😂

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes! See an seasoned pro comparison of brands at www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/nikon-vs-canon-vs-sony-full-frame.htm thanks!

    • @TW-iu9zy
      @TW-iu9zy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KenRockwellTV ... your conclusion: „Sony needs to step up its game to stay in the game it invented“ ... 😄 ...

  • @billx4266
    @billx4266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes its true, an iphone has very good film quality. BTW i had canon, started with this brand, then i went to sony for a long while, and now im back to canon with the R5. I cannot help it but the colors out of camera are still the best. Now i will stay with canon.

  • @PJL10100
    @PJL10100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great work Ken! Love your no BS reviews. You’ve been so helpful to me over the years. I’ll be sure to use your purchase links. The least I could do to reciprocate 🙏😊

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!!!!! This is why I do this.

  • @AMomentInTimeProductions
    @AMomentInTimeProductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this is truly the pinnacle of all camera's out there, sense the Nikon D850. this camera rules both in Still Photography and Video, you can actually get video clips in 8K crazy, and at 4k you can record in high frame rates, this camera is the BEST Camera so far out there today i agree, yes it's $5,000.00 but well worth the extra money.

  • @NVIK5
    @NVIK5 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Lesser brands like Sony and Nikon? You are a bit biased, aren't you? You somehow managed to rate even the EOS R higher than the Z6/Z7 and Sony options which says it all. Up until now Canon was clearly lagging behind. Your much beloved 0.95 has terrible image quality wide open, so I do not quite understand why you keep praising it.

    • @kenjiyamamoto9499
      @kenjiyamamoto9499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      His probably right,. 45% of market shares goes to Canon,. While 55% goes to nikon, Sony, fuji, Pentax, lumix, etc.,. Almost half of market shares goes canon,.

    • @NVIK5
      @NVIK5 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kenjiyamamoto9499 market share does not equal product quality. Canon is fantastic, I do not dispute that, but this does not mean that other companies produce inferior products. Look at the original EOS R review, he thought that was the best mirrorles camera ever existed....

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      And for good reason! Thanks!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      As we say in America, second place is the first loser. Thanks!

    • @NVIK5
      @NVIK5 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV I thought in America everyone is special :-).
      th-cam.com/video/w6Xtk7ALaUI/w-d-xo.html

  • @IAmR1ch
    @IAmR1ch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember when your website was bright yellow back in 2000, I bought and SB28 (still have it) on your recommendation for my old N90s(which you did not like the camera that much but got it cheap, and still have it). In 2002 I bought a D100 (still have it) after I seen your review and got me started into digital photography.. What I always liked about you is your ability to handle nay-sayer and harsh critics with a positive friendly attitude and you still do it that today. Good job over the years. Your video was great on the R5. I put my order in for one. 20 years later I am still listening to the advise of Ken Rockwell.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      THANK YOU!!!!!!! I remember the yellow pages; there are still some of them lurking on my site that I see every once in a long while, ha ha.

  • @parmanduke
    @parmanduke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You sang such high praises for the recent Sony A7 line and now the R5 made it horrible and obsolete according to you. Oh come now.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct. The world changes. This is what did it. Thanks!

    • @MrRalboi919
      @MrRalboi919 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Classic Ken Rockwell quick witted smart mouth lol🤣🤣🤣 I can't wait for sony to bust Canons ass lol with new tech lol

  • @DonovinJones
    @DonovinJones 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can already tell that there are gonna be people who just want to hate on the R5 in the comments of this video pretty soon. If your a Sony shooter you might disagree with some things he has to say in this vide 😂

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s not 2013 anymore. Time to man-up to Canon from Sony. Thanks!

  • @Sam1986E
    @Sam1986E 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That moon shot is incredible

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      And easy with this camera. Thanks!

  • @jhellier
    @jhellier 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    one of the annoyances with the r5 (besides the inflated price and overheating) is that it needs to be customized much more heavily than a dslr to be enjoyable to use.
    If the body was alittle bigger it would allow an improved button layout. im still puzzled by the lack of a mechanical mode dial, no other camera company has removed it on their high end cameras. the electronic mode dial is a PITA to press - its just as bad as the touchbar imo.
    also BBAF feels a bit awkward due to the recessed feel of the AF on button, the info, Q and zoom buttons are a bit small and cramped (make sure you trim your fingernails before shooting). There are too many buttons on the right side of the camera, it just doesn't "feel" right to me. The camera will definitely produce great results but I can't help but feel the usability has been compromised. It feels more like an expensive consumer level camera than a professional tool like the 5d4.
    Canon seems to be prioritizing aesthetics and compactness over function and usability, and somebody there is making really bad design decisions. Its seems like the team that designed the pro DSLR bodies (5d4, 1dx3) had zero input for the RF bodies. The extending zoom mechanism of the rf 70-200 2.8 is too cumbersome for shooting sports.
    I'm curious to see the body design of the R1, the rumoured professional level body. if they get that right it would give me hope that things could change in the future bodies.

  • @Rookz
    @Rookz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well I know where _not_ to go for an unbiased opinion. Calling the A9 and A9ii outdated saying Sony is old news when they’ve been crushing mirrorless from the get go. The R5 is absolutely a great camera, but Jesus Christ, does canon pay extra for deep throating like this?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, Sony crushed Nikon and invented full frame Mirrorless starting in 2013. It’s not 2013 anymore. Thanks!

    • @Rookz
      @Rookz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KenRockwellTV It isn't, but the A9 and A9ii aren't a decade old tech like you said in your video. They were the first camera at the pricepoint with 20fps and no blackout. Your review is as biased as can be.

  • @yetanotherfilmchannel5766
    @yetanotherfilmchannel5766 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Sony shade lol

  • @paulgill3785
    @paulgill3785 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi Ken, Your online reviews have helped me immensely over the years to decide on which Canon gear was best suited to my needs.
    First time I’ve seen you on with the vloggers, but not filming yourself in 8k 😂.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even if I wasted time with 8k, how would you see it in 8k? Only 3% of views on TH-cam actually see my 4k content in 4K. Thanks!

  • @mibophoto
    @mibophoto 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As as always your vast knowledge is appreciated. your reviews are real, uncomplicated & unbiased. A lession to those youtubers and their foolishness.
    Thanks always Ken.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I just say it like it is. I don’t watch TH-cam - except for Jay Leno’s garage.

  • @3mfreale
    @3mfreale 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have been reading your reviews forever, absolute OG. Can't believe you have a TH-cam channel.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks!!! My kids made me do it.

  • @Noeman2009
    @Noeman2009 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Transitioned from full frame analog to APS-C digital SLR, I read your blog so I could choose which lens suit my needs. That was 9 years ago.
    Some people love to bashing you, I always love your reviews, yiyrs are better than DPR Camera Review's actually, your photos are always top notch.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I don’t know that anyone bashed me; I speak from genuine experience and talent (ahem) so casual shooters often have misconceptions and disagree with the way full time career pros shoot. remember DPR has never been written by shooters; their founder was a computer programmer who sold it to amazon years ago, and today at best its writers are young hobbyists - not experienced career artists or full time pros by any stretch of the imagination. They’re thorough, but lack the experience to know what’s really important and often follow the same misleading trends as other hobbyists. Thanks!!!

  • @michaelramey4200
    @michaelramey4200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Opinions are a dime a dozen on social media but Ken Rockwell always has qualified opinions with a clear rationale behind them. It is always a pleasure to watch his reviews. Great one!

  • @frankvisler9596
    @frankvisler9596 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it only me having strange expirence on sound on this video ? the speak travels between left and right constantly for me

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct. It’s in stereo and I move around. Thanks!

  • @eicarshiva
    @eicarshiva 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am happy to see you on TH-cam. Loved all your article from blog

  • @correct_lee
    @correct_lee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems like every review/video is more of someones face and them blabbing than honest thoughts and actual images. Very refreshing review thank you!!!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for noticing, I put a lot of effort into getting straight to the point.

  • @PaulKretz
    @PaulKretz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm pretty much sure it's better then my *5D Classic* in all, but price 😀

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And the photos all look pretty much the same, but boy, do the LCDs look different! Thanks!

  • @지나가는나그네3306
    @지나가는나그네3306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm watching your video well.
    I'm a high amateur preparing for a commercial photographer.
    I'm going to take pictures of portrates and products.
    I don't think I'm gonna take a quick picture.
    I'd like to ask your opinion because I have to buy a camera.
    Assuming the budget doesn't matter,
    I'm thinking about which one to choose between Fuji's gfx100 / R5.
    I'm going to take pictures instead of videos.
    I'd appreciate it if you could leave a reply!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Canon EOS R5. Much better as I see it. Better handling, better images (better color). If you want to make money at this when you say ‘pro,’ then spend as little as you can on gear until you actually start making money. Personally I’d stick with my favorite 5DS/R which is on dale on close out for $1,499 USD at www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1119027-REG/canon_0582c002_eos_5ds_r_dslr.html?BI=287&KBID=1037

  • @mhsvz6735
    @mhsvz6735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thank you for another excellent review!

  • @quillsensations2518
    @quillsensations2518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good subjects. Good vision. Soulful creativity. Dynamic light. And good post shooting creativity make good pictures. Interplay with the subject. Deeper and deeper interplay with deeper subjects. In other words. Good photographers make good pictures. When will we start talking about the dynamic rage of creativity instead of the the dynamic range of the sensor? I have taken more interesting and more dynamic pictures as a teenager 25 years ago with a pin hole camera I made out of a shoe box then the average photography gear reviewer. Dive deep. Work the subject. Go out and search for more and more subjects. Be more creative. Canon Nikon Pentax have no edge on what is possible with your creativity and your imagination. Be bold enough to shoot deeper then ever before.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. The camera never matters. www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm

  • @dakotaxu4792
    @dakotaxu4792 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So glad I found you on youtube!!!! Your reviews are off the charts!!!

  • @fallguy6558
    @fallguy6558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Been reading this guy's website for donkey years... his writing style is the same the way he talks it's like reading his website...

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! Can’t believe I’m still at it all day today after over 20 years.

  • @quazisanjeed6395
    @quazisanjeed6395 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Ken. I'm a fan of your reviews and almost always read those. I've gone through your recent review of March 2020 on Nikon D780 and was convinced that DSLRs still have a lot to give. Now, you're full of praises of an MILC Canon EOS R5 which is justified. However, could I have your opinion whether going mirrorless is a necessity especially for enthusiasts like me when great DSLRs like the above mentioned Nikon or Canon EOS 1Dx Mark III are around! Thank you in advance.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not at all necessary. It’s just the trend and the future, but if you’re happy, no need whatsoever to spend money. See also www.kenrockwell.com/tech/upgrades.htm Thanks!

  • @gargvibhash
    @gargvibhash 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have been buying cameras since 1970. How old are you? The review amazing. I am also playing with R5 these days and it's a never before equipment for sure.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bought my first SLR used at age 11 in 1973. My parents bought or loaned me cameras well before I saved up to get my own. Thanks!

  • @K9malinois_dog_love
    @K9malinois_dog_love 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    VCR makers lol😂 you got that one right.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm so bad. Thanks!

  • @emptyandseephotos7858
    @emptyandseephotos7858 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw many reviewsat the time of release an d now in 2022jan yours give most answer's to my questions great job

  • @lhhomes
    @lhhomes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Also glad to see you on the Tube! Been following your website for years as you have really helped me to be a better armature photographer and make good decisions on my gear!
    I got the R5 in my hands on day one of release and have fallen in love with its capabilities despite what you see/hear on the overheating during video recording. However, I don't shoot video, so don't care.
    So glad to see your review on your new R5, but would really like to see a video on how you setup your camera and how you like your settings. Possible?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      See www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm#usage and see my other guides RP etc). I set all my cameras the same; I just don’t always spend as much time writing use guides. Thanks!

  • @deangawler9727
    @deangawler9727 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love your straight-talking, no-BS reviews of cameras Ken - very refreshing compared to the multitude of other VLOGarazzi reviewers on TH-cam!

  • @mcmoose64
    @mcmoose64 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Ken , I have been waiting for a "Photography" review of this camera . I will probably pick up a second hand one when they bring out the mkiii version . I should have worn out my DSLRs by then .

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! But when the EOS R5 Mark II comes out, you’ll want that too. May as well get the R5 now so you can enjoy it and make great pictures with it for the next three years rather than waiting to get one used then. Thanks!

    • @mcmoose64
      @mcmoose64 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV but since buying my last beautiful hunk of "L" glass , I am running out of body parts to sell . Being a small time restaurateur in the age of 'rona is not the most lucrative of vocations 🤣😅😥

  • @gerhardmoeller774
    @gerhardmoeller774 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review… I’ve had my R5 for 5 months and I learned a lot from your vid. Enthusiastic subscriber! Thanks

  • @Sam1986E
    @Sam1986E 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You forgot to mention: it has built in HDR function (takes 3 shots and combines them in 1 JPEG), it has built in timelapse of 1080P, 4K and 8K!, it has normal timelapse function as well, it has built in Exposure bracketing.. and it has focus stacking but it doesn't create it in-camera because you can take up to 999 pictures in a stack!
    The best hybrid mirrorless workhorse of a camera ever made

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes; all that’s fairly common today. Just trying to stick to what’s special and unique in the interest of time. Thanks!

  • @juliusallen365
    @juliusallen365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I canceled my Z7 ii preorder and got the R5. I love Nikon but the Z7 ii didn’t get me excited like the R5.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly. I so hate the Z system, but talk about it because everyone wants to know. Thanks!

  • @ShaiYammanee
    @ShaiYammanee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank thank you for a great review.
    As primarily a photographer, I appreciate hearing a review from a stills perspective.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s what this is. If I shot video, I’d look at a Panavison or Arri rental for the project - or a real video camera. Thanks!

  • @j_g123
    @j_g123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review. As a long time Pro Canon user, it's great to see Canon do mirrorless right. Ergonomics, menu system, practical things like a curtain to cover sensor during lens changes, drop in filter adapters etc. Maybe time to update the 1dx2 and 5d4 to an R6 and R5 until the R1 comes out.

  • @skatertwig26
    @skatertwig26 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't agree with most these comments to be honest. Even if Canon is starting to push past Sony's tech, they are only doing so because of Sony. The fact is Sony made the mirrorless market what it is. Canon has been known to be sluggish until recently, and they do not always listen. Sony is not some toy, they make high end cameras and sensors. They have their own issues, as does Canon. Also, to the people who say "get a video camera if you don't want it to overheat" make no sense. Mirrorless cameras are often hybrid cameras, and they would not implement 8k raw as an after thought. Canon does not want to cannibalize their dedicated video cameras. Just some thoughts, and no I do not shoot Sony. All companies need work, but it's good to see progress.

  • @JetCooper3D
    @JetCooper3D 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subscribing... brilliant no rubbish review. Love the delivery. Thank you!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank YOU!!!! I spend a lot of time keeping it short and to the point. THANKS!

  • @frankcruz8068
    @frankcruz8068 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent review. I don't buy anything without reading your review and opinion first for the last 10+ years. You are the best in objectivity and common sense. I'm a Nikon guy since 1979 and buy gear regularly. Thank you!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank YOU for reading it all! You guys make it all worthwhile. I love my Nikons, but these Canons are even better, at least to me lately. THANKS!!

  • @Helloworldwrjfjrjrj
    @Helloworldwrjfjrjrj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi. So what would spend your own money on Nikon or canon Murrow less systems

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I spend it much more on canon. Hope that’s obvious. See www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/nikon-vs-canon-vs-sony-full-frame.htm

  • @philfyphil
    @philfyphil 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can’t quite work out why but your audio drifts around over the stereo field. There is either some kind of fault or maybe you are using a stereo mic that is close to you and you are turning your head whilst talking. It’s a little disconcerting. Other than that very minor point, a very informative video, so thanks.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      True stereo recording precisely captures my motion. My upcoming five new videos are recorded in mono due to these comments - because I’d rather not have to put my head in one of those 1870s portrait head holders. . Lets see if you like those better in a week or so when they release about the R6 and the RF 100-500mm. Thanks!

  • @siobahnquinn7461
    @siobahnquinn7461 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are these things true about the R5? Sounds amazing. Stopped using Canon for a lot of my shooting for a few reasons. But I will have to look into this new mirrorless camera, sounds incredible!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Everything I said I saw. Not sure what your question is. I so love this thing. Thanks!

    • @siobahnquinn7461
      @siobahnquinn7461 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@KenRockwellTV - No question. Just thanking you for putting me in the direction of the R5. I don't watch and trust a lot of YT's as you said, many with conflicts of interest. Found an R5 in stock after 20 minutes of deep searching and it will be here on Friday! Looking way forward to it! Had no idea that Sony was old news and old tech as you said. Thanks for setting me straight on that. I had thought about that new low light Sony because I do a lot of video each week. But I never liked those other deep menus and 8K will be great so I don't have to setup multiple interview cams! I had budgeted quite a bit more $$$, but I already have Canon glass, so the R5 is perfect based on everything you explained and its specifications. And saving a lot of money over the 8K I had considered.

  • @daysinn4517
    @daysinn4517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely legit, raw, sincere, insightful and helpful review.

  • @Sam1986E
    @Sam1986E 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing review! Thanks! I am in love with R5! Best camera ever created

  • @Thomasjcolbert82
    @Thomasjcolbert82 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So this does animal Eye AF with birds fine? I notice the small Sony’s don’t work with birds.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure! That roadrunner was running all over the place. Thanks!

  • @viperstinger77
    @viperstinger77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    other company's are really VCR's makers that was the most savage low down nasty dig at sony...haha love it

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sony makes superb pro audio and video gear, as well as image sensors. They’re just trying to create a new market, which they did, for their sensors with Mirrorless cameras. As you can see, they stopped introducing any significantly nee cameras over a year ago, letting Nikon and Canon take the baton again. Thank you, Sony!

  • @Goodman-4525
    @Goodman-4525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    You're the only reviewer I've ever seen genuinely liking superzooms

    • @kikipratama1
      @kikipratama1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He knows what he shoots. If versatility is the key to bring you good images, it will be good.

    • @baker2niner
      @baker2niner 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They seem to have improved a lot in this mirrorless generation.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They work great; just look at the pictures. It’s not 1987 any more; they work awesome today.

    • @nickfanzo
      @nickfanzo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zooms are better than ever in 2020. Soon it’ll be all you need

  • @Adam.Robert
    @Adam.Robert 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent review, but if watching with headphones the stereo image of the voice over is rather distracting. Consider mono for voice over recording and/or processing.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I tried it, but I love real stereo. It's moving because I'm moving; it's not tape dropout. THANKS!

    • @ColinRobertson_LLAP
      @ColinRobertson_LLAP 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed. Ken, if we can't see you moving on screen, then what's the point?

  • @freddieslaughter1107
    @freddieslaughter1107 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ken, Will the Canon 580EX2 flash work on the R5?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mine works great!!!

  • @chesslover8829
    @chesslover8829 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You might want to let people know that Canon has no plan to license third-party lens makers, like Tamron and Sigma. Also, the current lineup of mirrorless Canon lenses is a bit thin, especially for those who want a good prime lens but are not prepared to pay $2,000 or more per copy. On the other hand, Canon *does* offer the excellent 24-105mm f4 and 70-200mm f4 lenses for landscape photographers who like to stop down and use a good tripod.
    However, with some careful lens selection and the use of adapters, one could assemble a useful landscape/fine arts kit:
    *Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Camera*
    1) Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens
    2) Canon RF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens
    3) Canon RF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens
    4) Optional: Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens
    *Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R:*
    1) Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
    2) Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens
    3) Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Lens
    *Urth Lens Mount Adapter:*
    1) ZEISS Biogon T* 25mm f/2.8 ZM Lens
    2) Voigtlander 28mm f/2.0 Ultron
    3) Voigtlander APO-LANTHAR 35mm f/2.0 Aspherical Lens
    4) Voigtlander APO-LANTHAR 50mm f/2.0 Aspherical Lens
    5) Voigtlander 90mm f/2.8 Apo-Skopar

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Canon makes all the lenses I need, and I’m no fan of off brand lenses. While the junk brands can have great optics, their long term support makes less sense. Thanks!

    • @chesslover8829
      @chesslover8829 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Junk brands? That's a good one. Opine much?

  • @tonygreenmike
    @tonygreenmike 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is Ken's favourite song after he came to TH-cam ? - Rockwell's Somebody's watching me ;) Ken's reviews on his website was/is the go to site for me to know everything about a camera, now I am happier to hear what he says. Thanks Ken.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks love my song!!!!

    • @tonygreenmike
      @tonygreenmike 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Happy to see your reply. Keep rocking. I can't wait to see your exhaustive review with sample images shot with your lens.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonygreenmike Here you go! www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm

    • @tonygreenmike
      @tonygreenmike 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Thanks Ken. I watched your R5 review on youtube. I was fascinated to see the images. The exhaustive review that I mentioned in my earlier comment was regarding the RF-70-200. Waiting to see your clicks with that lens. :) I will be reading your R5 review witten on your website too. Thanks again :)

  • @stevelink21
    @stevelink21 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent review as always, Ken! Based on your review of the Z7 ("World's Highest Technical Image Quality") and the Nikkor S lenses, I decided to go with the Nikon Z7 System. I especially look forward to the combination of the Z7 and the ultra-sharp NIkkor S 50 f/1.8 (at f/8) for my product photography! Thanks again, and Be Safe!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank YOU!!!

    • @stevelink21
      @stevelink21 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Thank YOU, Ken! I shall read Every Nikkor and Nikkor S lens review from you, prior to getting any other lenses down the road. I look forward to seeing not only their image quality, but also their build quality as well. My only slight concern with the Z7's build quality, is that I read of instances of disintegrating rubber around the grip on some models. I was told by Nikon that, if one gets a more recent model of the Z7, that it won't occur. So, evidently Nikon was aware of it, and made a fix in newer models.

  • @yalpishivaprasad9539
    @yalpishivaprasad9539 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fan of your reviews. Instantly subscribed as soon as i saw your channel. Thanks for the clear and crisp reviews.

  • @Ramage7070
    @Ramage7070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Moon blur!!! Awesome

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Es Verdad - truth! Typical with telescopes like this. Thanks.

  • @nghinguyen5944
    @nghinguyen5944 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow ... I love 💕 dream Len Canon EF 50mm f1.0 L USM ...

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s not a dream; you can get one now at Ebay at a reasonable price. Collectors haven’t noticed this one yet. Full review and links to get it at www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/50mm-f1.htm

  • @karlmullings5824
    @karlmullings5824 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Ken been a fan for year. Very refreshing to see you start with photos and not videos like a lot of the Sony fan boys.
    Great review

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I use my iPhone for video, which is better than these cameras. THANKS!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @BHUBJOHNNY
    @BHUBJOHNNY 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ken: you are the best reviewer👍👍

  • @simongentry
    @simongentry 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ken! once again an excellent review. have you retested with the latest firmware 1.6? ty

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No; I expect cameras to work properly as shipped and don’t waste much time maintaining software unless something really important gets added. Thanks!

    • @simongentry
      @simongentry 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV ok ty

  • @wolfheilmann1257
    @wolfheilmann1257 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the great review.
    It seems you like the RF 24-240 a lot. Just bought my Canon RP and the only set fast available was the one with this superzoom. When I bought it, I wasn't sure until it arrived 2 days later. The only caveat I found was the slow aperture at the long end, but its still better than the RF 24-105/4-7.1!
    And am really happy you love this superzoom as much as I do. Of course, the RP isn't as good as the R5, but as amateur I can't afford this beast.
    Thanks for your great work (not just this video)

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The RP is lighter and less expensive and takes the same pictures, just not as many per second. RP sounds better to me! Thanks!

    • @wolfheilmann1257
      @wolfheilmann1257 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ken Rockwell thanks for you comment. Just saw how good the autofocus works on the R5 and the tracking! There must be some reasons why it’s 2.000 USD more expensive.
      But I just upgraded from my Nikon D90, after I tried taking sunsets and saw that 95% of the shots were out of focus as camera searched between close flower, bushes, far away trees and sun at virtually infinity. So understood it‘s a 14 year old technology against a 1 year old technology.

  • @kennethlui2268
    @kennethlui2268 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I read your online reviews many times, but didn't know you have a youtube channel. Another cool review. Yup, the R5 is so popular that tons of people are still waiting for their pre-orders to arrive. This is an awesome camera for stills. Video is also great except for time restriction due to overheating.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed. Thanks!

    • @tonygreenmike
      @tonygreenmike 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd love to see Canon drop another body with a pixel count of 26 or 30mp exclusively focussing on photocentric features. R5 has everything, but 8k is kinda overkill and many photographers don' need that. (IMO) R6 is an awesome option, but for those who need that additional/extra pixel, a body with 30mp, top LCD (Culling the top LCD in R6 is a crime :( -- Personally I would feel handicapped), illuminated buttons, better weather sealing, etc., will be something awesome. With that, photographers will have an option to choose between R5 and R6 and priced accordingly to be the "best universal camera" (As Ken mentioned in his 5DMk4 review). I believe Ken's feedback will be given priority by Canon :)

  • @randomrazr
    @randomrazr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    been watching ur website for over a decade. and now i discover u have youtube. FINALLY

  • @kurt.wilkinsongardendesign
    @kurt.wilkinsongardendesign 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does the electronic view finder compare to a canon DSLR? I have a small Panasonic mirrorless and its view finder is small and rubbish compared to my canon DSLR. Hence I only use the back LCD screen of the Panasonic when taking pictures.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ooooh, the finder is awesome! You see how the picture is going to look - BEFORE you take it! Always bright and sharp, even with slow lenses.

  • @ADFCHRONICLES
    @ADFCHRONICLES 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    still getting used to having you on utube!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Crazy, huh? THankS!

    • @ADFCHRONICLES
      @ADFCHRONICLES 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV crazy but great also, funny your voice kinda matches how I read on your website, .-)

  • @DB-nl9xw
    @DB-nl9xw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Excellent review. Thanks.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank YOU!!! Full written review & sample files at www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm

  • @rwhunt99
    @rwhunt99 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do they come as dirty as yours? You could have cleaned yours up just a bit.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I could and did, but the video is such high resolution so close and the camera lightens the all-black camera to show things completely invisible to the naked eye. I know; it looks GROSS in the video; but that’s what happens when you shoot every day for a living rather than just talk about it. See also www.kenrockwell.com/tech/2-kinds-of-photographers.htm thanks!

    • @rwhunt99
      @rwhunt99 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Thanks for that honest answer!

  • @KaiTiura
    @KaiTiura 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only issue here is the reference to video "cool-down" times... way off! Shooting 4K or 8K for half an hour (I don't think it does that EVER in 4K HQ or 8K anything) means a wait period of a LOT longer than ten or twenty minutes. Be honest. There's more than enough evidence out there to the contrary.
    I have one, I absolutely love it, but even with tonight's update, high quality video shooting has pretty severe limitations. Is it the best camera I've ever shot with? You betcha! For video, there are a lot of quirks to be worked out, which I'm sure Canon will address soon. Am I happy with my purchase? You bet your ass I am.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don’t know; when I shoot video, I use a video camera rather than one of these. Thanks!

  • @RickyJr46
    @RickyJr46 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ken, does the R5's EVF update more quickly than the EOS R's? The latter displays the last recorded image long enough to be problematic when shooting sequences of a moving subject. Last October I was taking trackside sequences of the approaching Big Boy 4014 and this EVF discontinuity made precise framing while zooming a real challenge. In that regard the EVF was inferior to a DSLR's continuous real time display. If the R5 is a solid step forward in EVF performance I will upgrade!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. The R5 and R6 finders update much faster. Thanks!

  • @networm64
    @networm64 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh so Ken has totally sold his soul to Canon! I really couldn't keep watching the video after few first mins of it.... Calling R5 the best mirrorless camera been ever made was a big claim as it's a personal taste... But smirking whenever talking about Sony and Nikon was really a bad bad bad move I never expected from you! I wish you never entered the YT so I could still rely on your great website which I can hardly check it again anymore after this!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Speaking from my own heart - no sales to Satan involved. For the still photos I do, this canon is the best for action and still subjects. Thanks!

  • @Karthik-The-Photographer
    @Karthik-The-Photographer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey sir can you show us some of the medium resolution (22MP format on full frame) samples, and I world personally would love to know how Canon R5 performs in low-light situations in that format and if possible please do a video on Sony A7Riii in that medium MP format (18MP) sir.. ☺️

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      See sample files you can download at each cameras review at KenRockwell.com I have few samples at the lower megapixel settings however. Thanks!

  • @sefrasus7360
    @sefrasus7360 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been reading your reviews for 15 years or so, never knew there were also videos. I like written reviews much better, though - interestingly, most of those of the R5 are more like previews, even you posted a stub first. Anyway, I love the puns and jokes like German wording in Leica reviews, sehr schön. But man, what happened to your JPEGs? They look like from a smartphone now; strong NR, strange sharpening with massive artifacts .. I used the RP's picture style editor to dial down NR to 0 and apply USM at 5-1-1 instead of the crappy sharpness setting, now they are almost identical to Raws developed with DPP (which I unfortunately have to run in a Win10 VM as a Linux user)..

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! That’s why we have adjustments: so we can each get our preferred look. Thanks again!!!

  • @waawaaweewaa2045
    @waawaaweewaa2045 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Ken, does the R5 produce more noise with post shadow recovery than the A7riv? Pretty much everything about the R5 seems superior, but I'm not familiar with canon sensors. I do plan on doing large print and am wondering how much resolution I would lose and if there is noticeably more recovery noise with the R5. thx.
    That battery life is disappointing. Reality is most people chimp their images rather frequently on a digital camera. 2-300 images is a little over an hour of shooting before you have to swap batteries, and more batteries translates to more weight in the backpack.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As always, the definitive answers lie in my written review and sample files and never at TH-cam. See the samples from both cameras at www.kenrockwell.com/sony/a7r-iv.htm#perf and www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm#highisos and you can see for yourself. I worry less about shadow details than the colors in the important parts, and for that, Canon looks way better - but we all have our preferences. For the most glowing shadows, use iso 50 on either of these. Thanks!

  • @SnapJimmy
    @SnapJimmy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Ken, enjoyed the review!! If money is not an issue would you recommend R5 or Canon 1DX Mk3 for an amateur sports photographer? (Main reason for consideration : cannot capture indoor basketball events with Nikon D750 or Canon 6D Mk2.. always too blurry or too grainy)

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s a tough one. The 1DX III, as an SLR, makes a load of noise and the finder gets all wishy washy since the mirror is spending as much time moving as actually showing you the finder imahe. I’d try the R5 or R6 first; they do it much more elegantly. Thanks!

  • @bobrose7900
    @bobrose7900 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great alternative review, or is that...real world. Disappointed with the loss of detail in the shadows at higher ISO, this appears to be incremental rather than ground breaking in terms of R&D. I've been saying it for a long time now, but phone tech. is driven by shear numbers sold, so development and software rules the waves. Some stunning pictures though, and all the features point to a stills camera, first and foremost, but it's the videographers that seem to be snapping them up. Love your reviews Ken.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shadow detail loss at high ISOs is in all cameras, and in our eyes. It’s the physics of how both work - I’m just the first to show it that clearly. Thanks!

  • @wingfieldphotography
    @wingfieldphotography 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks grey instead of black.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi! The video cameras auto exposure system got fooled by the all black camera so close. For my good photos of it see my exhaustive written review at www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm

  • @gkhnbyzt
    @gkhnbyzt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Firstl of all welcome to TH-cam after long writing reviews, as a hobby photographer i wrote you to 4 years ago and you criticized me not to professional, pro means only who earns money as a job, but nowadays almost every camera and lens sell to hobbyist why because people love technology in every detail otherwise almost every cameras and lenses are same as in small details. I wrote you to as an owner of all camera brands’ lenses and cameras... Most important thing is composition we know, i advice you to do your reviews as an information and advice to us not to criticize people.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! See also www.kenrockwell.com/tech/pro-camera.htm

  • @rfh1234
    @rfh1234 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Canon promo! First it's great at 45mb (oh me, an a9 sports, wildlife shooter is only 25mb), and then when shooting sports "or anything at high frame rates" (such as wildlife) Ken doesn't want to fill up his card and admits shooting "small jpeg files." Anyhow I enjoy Ken's review, and Canon and Sony cameras but some parts are a bit over the top Canon hype.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t want 45mp at 20 FPS but I do at one frame per hour. Thanks!

  • @davidspitz
    @davidspitz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any thoughts on R6 over R5 if like you ultra high quality (eg 8k) video isn’t really a big need? Is the 20 megapixels on the R6 enough? Idea being to wait a year or so (after they fix overheating issues) to go all in.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      8k video? Who cares - how do you see it? Even 10 MPs more than enough, see www.kenrockwell.com/tech/pixel-dumping.htm thanks!

  • @BrianSFischer
    @BrianSFischer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I went for the R5, Love it!

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too, glad you love yours.

    • @BrianSFischer
      @BrianSFischer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV Since the R5 depleted my budget, I decided to hold off on the Canon 85 mm RF. On a lark I picked up a used copy of the Samyang 85mm F1.4 on eBay for $500. After its firmware update, it is a truly remarkable lens for the money.

  • @thanyawong
    @thanyawong 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am your big fan at your web site. it's great to hear you on TH-cam. However please speak slowly and clearly. I've already subscribed. Thanks 😊.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! I like to go fast and get it over; look for the gear or settings icon in your player and set playback speed to 0.75 or 0.5x. Cool, huh? Thanks!

  • @laverami
    @laverami 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great info.
    Just one remark, stereo sound is great but your voice is moving left and right restlessly like a hospitalistic tiger and that makes it very difficult *for me* to concentrate on the content and the picture.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry. I’m moving. I should get one of those 1800s portrait photo head braces.

  • @amatthew7861
    @amatthew7861 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really enjoy the energy in your voice! Reminds me of Vince from Shamwow 😂

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! I dig this camera and I guess it comes out.

  • @SpencerLupul
    @SpencerLupul 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep in mind Ken, the IBIS feature is huge for videographers. If you can throw your f1.0 50mm on and get "usable" video clips, that is a game changer. So many Canon lenses that would be amazing for video, if only they had some IBIS behind them.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haven’t tried it for video. Never found anything great stabilizes better than an iPhone for video. Thanks!

  • @jubjuber1
    @jubjuber1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    one thing i noticed (at least on r6) is when u shut the camera off it closes the aperture down, i assume to help protect the shutter from sunlight?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aha! That’s exactly why. Thanks!

  • @firman286
    @firman286 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to know about a battery. Based on battery spec R5 only 320 shots, how many shots do you?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thousands for sports shots. Expect 320 if you stop and fiddle and play back each one and change settings, or thousands if you just shoot and don’t look back and futz. . See the battery life section of my formal written review. My written reviews are always the reference; not enough time on TH-cam to cover all the details. www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/r5.htm#powerbattery

  • @oAwwAo
    @oAwwAo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing review, I only buy my gear after I read your review about them. As I think you provide an honest practical review. Thank you.
    I wonder if you can make a review on the EOS R6 as well?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As soon as my R6 shows up! Just got my RF 70-200/2.8 and 85/1.2L to review next week. Thanks!

    • @oAwwAo
      @oAwwAo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV great lenses, can't wait to see your review.
      Would appreciate if you take a look at my modest channel of drone vedios, that I do in UAE.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@oAwwAo I'd love to see the UAE from the air. Where's you channel? THANKS!

    • @oAwwAo
      @oAwwAo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KenRockwellTV th-cam.com/users/oAwwAo
      Would so much appreciate your opinion

  • @maximme
    @maximme 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    world best mirrorless camera ??
    have you been playing with Sony cameras lately?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Been a couple of months with all this great Canon stuff here I prefer to shoot. It’s not 2013 anymore, canon is way ahead of Sony as usual again.

  • @chrismasters8884
    @chrismasters8884 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are u on canon payroll?

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, just been shooting over 50 years and people want my honest, seasoned opinion rather than the watery inexperienced BS everywhere else. Thanks!

  • @Magnetron692
    @Magnetron692 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Canon R5 with the Canon EF 1.0/50mm L USM - that’s a heck of a combination 👍🏻👍🏻😃

  • @nickfanzo
    @nickfanzo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wouldn’t even mention Sony at this point, it’s more of a gaming company than a camera one.

    • @KenRockwellTV
      @KenRockwellTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. They never bothered to heed input from full time shooters on how to make cameras. Now that there are better options they will need to adapt to survive. Thanks!