@@xbizydown its overrated, i stepped up from a 144hz and while yes, I could tell the difference between the two it wasn't thst big of a jump and in most games my PC doesn't even get 144fps let alone 280fps
@NVIDIA_GeForce_Game_Ready_Driv He's a friend helping. He's doing it to build a portfolio and earn a bit on the side. I don't see a problem with any of this.
you ultimately gave a better answer than kasaisora, there is not a certain *best* modpack, you showed both strenghts and weaknesses of each modpack. in the end it depends on your pc and monitor for what modpack suits your needs
When you said kasaisora was the reason u made this vid for a sec I thought he told you to promote his modpack without making it obvious, but appreciate the honesty just subbed
I'd never take money for a promotion without telling my viewers, and it's also illegal in the EU to not let people know when something is sponsored. Also thank you so much for the Sub it really goes a long way ❤️
yes, the nvidium mod gives a considerable advantage to the point I might make my own ultra light modpack to support all of the greatest optimization mods.
@@wh1zze yea I recommend taking mods from all the modpacks and remove the unnecessary ones that are included in performium and Adernaline then it would make the best modpack
I can't speak for others, but my packs in particular contain certain theming and elements and whatever is available for that mc version. For instance, i have one that is strictly medieval survival fantasy themed, while another tries to be akin to the MC trailer release. Another is just QOL+Performance and making it MC 2.0 basically.
The thing with distant horizons is that you have to like, let the world render for about 5 to 10 minutes so you finally can have your normal fps, otherwise it'll be like you showed!
wh1zze's editor here! I guarantee you that the raw video lasted more than 10 minutes. Additionally, wh1zze recorded the FPS throughout the entire game, a result you can see in the graph at the end. I imagine that the modpack could perform much better just by changing some settings, but the rules in the video are without any setting modifications.
@@wh1zze Those self-imposed "rules" go against all conventional benchmark comparison precedent. In order to have an ACTUAL performance comparison that gives you valid data, all settings need to be set exactly the same for each modpack (at least as much as possible, as ofc there's some mods which add new settings not available on other packs, etc). The way this was done, some modpacks are using maxed out settings by default, and others are using ultra-low settings, and others a mixture. As a result, we have no idea how much of an impact the mods themselves are actually having on performance, vs how much the different graphics settings are affecting performance. It needs to be an apples-to-apples comparison, otherwise the data is largely pointless.
Excellent video! Thank you, I really need this for my personal server modpack and FO was giving tons of issues since there's no versions using 1.8.0 Iris. (No idea why). Performium worked fantastic.
adding something for *competitive players* you should still focus on getting the highest FPS, even if your monitor can't display that much. higher FPS can result more responsive when pressing keys
TSK, looking at all these modpacks makes me want to configure my own optimized pack. Already basically got the essentials since i need to use them to power the full pack (280-300 mods both packs). Fabulously Optimized has some great mods but quite lacking in utility, while performium is basically a copy without adding any new sustenance. Sodium Extra tries that, but fails to optimize first. All in all, they all have potential and exceed at something while lacking in other places.
Would have been good if you'd tested them on both their default settings and then matched settings. At least just matching rander distance. I'm using Sodium (not plus) and I get over 1k fps on a reasonable render distance. Anyway good video still. Looks like I'll be checking out Performium. TY.
Simply Optimized is my way to go, I used to use Fabulously Optimized but I had lag spikes going to 10 fps due to the fact that there was alot more mods in Fabulously Optimized, I dont have that problem when using Simply Optimized
The reason your FPS was limited when testing Sodium Plus was that you still had Vsync enabled and set to Adaptive which dynamically enables and disables vsync to match your monitor's refresh rate. This was a great topic to cover. However, I hope you can do a follow-up video in the future where you set each video setting to be identical so that we can get a true comparison of the modpacks. Each of these modpacks use Sodium 0.5.11, so the real difference that you should be comparing is what all of the other mods included are doing such as Entity Culling, Indium, ModernFix, Noisium, etc. and how they impact your general FPS.
@@wh1zze I'm thinking of the story of a guy who bought a 300hz monitor and used it at 60hz for 5 years without knowing it because he forgot to change the setting.
Never forget that there is always a way to increase FPS in Minecraft, but to date there is no mod released that will fix the chunk loading issue in Minecraft. High FPS is good of course, but the most important thing is that the game does not freeze while the world is loading chunks, and yes, I will tell you a bitter truth; if your computer is not good enough (not everyone has a good computer) you will definitely experience a lag or freezing issue in Minecraft.
Thanks you so much❤❤ my computer is so noob it play minecraft on 10-20 fps(not have modpack) but when I install it is 70-80(Adernaline) fps Thank you❤❤
At 14:13 during the graph comparison, it may be a good idea to avoid using colors of the same shade to represent graph, such as both standing and running around as blue. Otherwise, good video.
i dont know if you know it or not but you couldn't set gui scale 3 on some of them is because when you are not in full screen you can only set it to 2, then after you fully exit settings and go back into them in full screen you can set the gui scale to 3.
You should compare them using the same render distance, and measure the fps with another program like Nvidia FrameView, to avoid the effect of F3 over fps.
resourcify is cool, but not really applicable to prism laucher, because prism has that functionality built in too. so having to load an extra mod for something you dont use that often just seems wasteful. in the end, designing your own pack (which is really easy with prism!) is the best way to get a good balance between QoL and performance, and also a great learning opportunity!
Something i'd like to say is that nvidium only works for cards that got released after the rtx 2000 series because nvidium uses a feature that cards older than the rtx 2000 series don't have to optimise the game. For example i have a gtx 1060 so nvidium is useless for me.
I went from 100fps in my base to 1000 fps with all of the mod packs some mods thrown out because they dropped fps but holy I actually thought my pc was just cooked
Correction simply optimized does have Iris support. I play with shaders all the time, and you can download all the mods that are in every other pack into simply optimized. It's not hard
@@wh1zze I guess you could say that but in my opinion adding one or two mods doesn't change it into your own mod pack, but I do see what you're saying cuz when you download a modpack you expect everything to be there?
How come? At the time of the 2080 super that i have it was the best cpu, 8 cores st 5.2 ghz is really good enough to run a 4080 in games without any bottleneck
@@wh1zzeGhz is a largely useless metric. It's like the RPM of a car. It just tells you the RPM of your engine and that's all. You can't compare RPM across cars. The 9900k is a fine cpu, in a cpu bound game like minecraft it can hold back most modern gpus with ease though. A 4080 would especially be a stretch with a decent chunk of titles at sub 4k
@@wh1zze I wouldn't say it's THAT good. But technically, yes. But specifically for Minecraft the newer the cpu, the better, since it uses single core. Even with sodium and all, the cpu is still the most important part for maxing those frames in Minecraft.
I'm not trying to say it's bad, but you would get more frames with in Minecraft specifically. I mean the 13900k has almost double the single threaded performance. And the i3 14100 is almost 1.5x better single threaded performance
it may depends on a lot of factors such as actually recording a video, general pc configuration, game version, ram allocations, background processes, cooling and power. the sake of the video was to compare all the modpacks on this same platform.
I know you might get this alot and may be annoyed, but for Minecraft I use Linux Mint, I also use Windows but not Minecraft on Windows. On vanilla Minecraft, I get 60+ FPS on Linux Mint, whereas on Windows I get barely 30. Nvidia drivers may be a bit funky but overall I just wanted to suggest possibly trying Linux for more frames if you haven't.
I actually don't get this a lot. But I do also use linux, mainly for school since I study IT, I'm obligated to learn 2 operating systems. But thank you so much for the insight I'll try Minecraft on linux out and I'll make a video on it.
Bro i use Fedora Silverblue Linux latest. I use vulkan32x modpack from modrinth.This have 60-140more fps on my pc than performium.Performium has the best fps on my pc From sodium modpacks
SO is actually worse than FO for me because in FO there is a "reduce resolution on macos" option which cranked my fps up to 200+, in SO I get barely 60
I'm sorry to hear your experience. I am currently working on making my own modpack using all the optimization mods + some tips. If that cant help nothing will.
allooo these are my specs =) CPU Intel i5-8265U @ 1.60GHz 1.80 GHz RAM 8 GB GPU Nvidia GeForce MX230 I know, not the best. But i've started an Aternos Fabric 1.21.1 server with some friends, we havent played in some time and most of us have pretty low-end pcs. what modpack could you recommend for us to use roughly based on my specs? to mention, we do have a light medieval-ish modpack running alongside the server that's been tested and it works fine. Though i do seem to experience lag spikes every so often while playtesting the server any guidance please? kinda hard to choose from so many optimisation modpacks out there =)
I get high average fps but my game is stuttering so bad and its very often, mostly when generating chunks, i play with the remarkably optimized modpack, nvidium on with 64 chunks
Try allocating the game more ram, closing backround tasks or moving the game to an ssd, if nothing works check the ingame settings, turn down the render distance and a vod mod to get 64 chunks, make sure vsync is off and make sure you dont have any mods you dont need other than that idk... Try optifine maybe :)
for some reason, when using any of these mod packs, i can barely get over 100 fps, and i cant even get 60 with shaders. i have an amd ryzen 9 5950x, rtx 3080ti, and 64 gb of ram, so theres absolutely no way my pc isnt good enough to do it, but i dont know what im doing wrong
What are your chunks set to anything over 24 is hard to run. Also disable vsync and allocate minecraft more ram, by default its 2 gb which is not enough for this many modpacks
Then it might be an old or faulty java install, delete java and reinstall the latest and run minecraft with that, alternatively vulkan mod runs great with newer systems you can also try that
@@wh1zzethere is a modpack for 1.8.9 i found recently called “Max FPS” and it’s really the only good fps modpack on 1.8.9 that actually includes a sufficient amount of mods, i would mention it if you made a part 2 as i couldn’t recommend it enough Look it up on modrinth
hello just a question, does Nvidium count as an Optimization ModPack? I am only asking this because I saw a few videos on it and it looks quite promising.
Bro my pc is ass I can't even run vanilla minecraft. When i run performance modpacks i get 40 to 65 fps😭 Specs: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4570 CPU @ 3.20GHz RAM: 16 GB Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 Chipset: GeForce GT 705 Total Memory: 10 GB Dedicated Memory: 2.0 GB
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
saying that you "only" have a 280 hz monitor is crazy work lmao
compared to the fps these modpacks give yeah ig 280 is bad.
mine is only 165 :( i want 280hz too 😢
@@xbizydown its overrated, i stepped up from a 144hz and while yes, I could tell the difference between the two it wasn't thst big of a jump and in most games my PC doesn't even get 144fps let alone 280fps
@xbizydown dude I have 60hz monitor stop complaining
@@I.Love.Python never complained
Thanks for checking out Performium
-one of Memebercat studios team :)
Thanks for commenting on my video
-one of the wh1zze's channel editor :)
Dang, why is this like the movies
@arrangedforlife yw too
- also a random guy
@@wh1zze why do you have an editor for a channel with less than 1k subs lmao
@NVIDIA_GeForce_Game_Ready_Driv He's a friend helping. He's doing it to build a portfolio and earn a bit on the side. I don't see a problem with any of this.
you ultimately gave a better answer than kasaisora, there is not a certain *best* modpack, you showed both strenghts and weaknesses of each modpack. in the end it depends on your pc and monitor for what modpack suits your needs
i don't think a i9 9900 and rtx 2080 can only get like 60 fps in vanilla it has to be sodium plus v sync on adaptive
Chatgpt reviewing your classwork like a teacher ass response.
When you said kasaisora was the reason u made this vid for a sec I thought he told you to promote his modpack without making it obvious, but appreciate the honesty just subbed
I'd never take money for a promotion without telling my viewers, and it's also illegal in the EU to not let people know when something is sponsored. Also thank you so much for the Sub it really goes a long way ❤️
Like ALL of his videos clearly promoting his own modpacks and forgetting to show the qualities of other modpacks, lol
i love how you showed in game fps instead of just a graph like most people
i always play with 40 to 50fps and now i am finally at 60+ fps. thank you very much
U got it
the nvidium mod gave simply optimized a huge advantage otherwise if we add the mod to fabously optimized, it gives more fps
yes, the nvidium mod gives a considerable advantage to the point I might make my own ultra light modpack to support all of the greatest optimization mods.
@@wh1zze yea I recommend taking mods from all the modpacks and remove the unnecessary ones that are included in performium and Adernaline then it would make the best modpack
@@wh1zze definitely
@@wh1zze yes but only works for nvidia gpus
@@digjhow1428and? if you dont have a compatible gpu it just disables itself
with Sodium Plus you've been using "VSync: Adaptive" setting, probably that's why you had that kind of fps behavior
Now I Gotta Need A 1000hz monitor
Does that exist? Even if it would. My wallet would hurt too much
@@wh1zze haha
@@wh1zzeno only 540hz and 480hz Monitor are the best rt now
I want to buy 4k monitor
@@PrinceSingh-ld1ls ok
i didnt even know different modpacks offer different quality of life mods...
crazy that different modpacks are different
I can't speak for others, but my packs in particular contain certain theming and elements and whatever is available for that mc version. For instance, i have one that is strictly medieval survival fantasy themed, while another tries to be akin to the MC trailer release. Another is just QOL+Performance and making it MC 2.0 basically.
@@Sov.Beowulf do you have any of these packs posted somewhere so i can try?
How
13:56 this is the "secordary zoom" from zoomify
I have set it to K
@@Winale never used it before :)
The thing with distant horizons is that you have to like, let the world render for about 5 to 10 minutes so you finally can have your normal fps, otherwise it'll be like you showed!
wh1zze's editor here! I guarantee you that the raw video lasted more than 10 minutes. Additionally, wh1zze recorded the FPS throughout the entire game, a result you can see in the graph at the end. I imagine that the modpack could perform much better just by changing some settings, but the rules in the video are without any setting modifications.
10 minutes aint enough chief. i had to let my pc sit overnight for 500 chunks lmao. granted my pc is a potate
@@wh1zze A chunk preloader is a must. Let it run overnight when the office is closed. The test should really be redone for fairness' sake.
@@wh1zze Those self-imposed "rules" go against all conventional benchmark comparison precedent.
In order to have an ACTUAL performance comparison that gives you valid data, all settings need to be set exactly the same for each modpack (at least as much as possible, as ofc there's some mods which add new settings not available on other packs, etc).
The way this was done, some modpacks are using maxed out settings by default, and others are using ultra-low settings, and others a mixture. As a result, we have no idea how much of an impact the mods themselves are actually having on performance, vs how much the different graphics settings are affecting performance.
It needs to be an apples-to-apples comparison, otherwise the data is largely pointless.
i use fabulously optimised and add nvidium, it works about the same as simply optimised, just with the extra features. thanks for the video!
thats a nice idea combining strenghts of different modpacks
Excellent video! Thank you, I really need this for my personal server modpack and FO was giving tons of issues since there's no versions using 1.8.0 Iris. (No idea why). Performium worked fantastic.
Awesome to see another comparison! Everyone's PC will render different results, so it's good to see different perspectives. Good video mate ❤
I'm glad my video reached you c;
Underrated video. Great job though
Thanks, a sub goes a long way if you want to see more ❤️
I will usually change my JDK to Graalvm to gain even more fps. I personally have been doing this for around a year now and works great!
how to do that
Isn't adoptium better? Ive seen multiple benchmarks on reddit.
i use adoptium
adding something for *competitive players*
you should still focus on getting the highest FPS, even if your monitor can't display that much. higher FPS can result more responsive when pressing keys
love the shader support I use it everyday now...
what is the meaning of life
to like, subscribe and hit that bell
@@wh1zze 💀
@@wh1zze nahhhh... that's too far.
To reproduce
42
TSK, looking at all these modpacks makes me want to configure my own optimized pack. Already basically got the essentials since i need to use them to power the full pack (280-300 mods both packs). Fabulously Optimized has some great mods but quite lacking in utility, while performium is basically a copy without adding any new sustenance. Sodium Extra tries that, but fails to optimize first. All in all, they all have potential and exceed at something while lacking in other places.
@@Sov.Beowulf if you do make a modpack let me know I'd happily try it on a video :)
It looks like I’ll be using SO then, since my laptop isn’t the best
I liked this video showing off the modpacks!
Would have been good if you'd tested them on both their default settings and then matched settings. At least just matching rander distance.
I'm using Sodium (not plus) and I get over 1k fps on a reasonable render distance.
Anyway good video still.
Looks like I'll be checking out Performium.
TY.
Simply Optimized is my way to go, I used to use Fabulously Optimized but I had lag spikes going to 10 fps due to the fact that there was alot more mods in Fabulously Optimized, I dont have that problem when using Simply Optimized
The lagspike might also be caused by a wrong setting like vsync
The reason your FPS was limited when testing Sodium Plus was that you still had Vsync enabled and set to Adaptive which dynamically enables and disables vsync to match your monitor's refresh rate.
This was a great topic to cover. However, I hope you can do a follow-up video in the future where you set each video setting to be identical so that we can get a true comparison of the modpacks. Each of these modpacks use Sodium 0.5.11, so the real difference that you should be comparing is what all of the other mods included are doing such as Entity Culling, Indium, ModernFix, Noisium, etc. and how they impact your general FPS.
Great Idea, also vsync doesn't explain everything since I have a 280hz monitor, yet I haven't seen fps higher than 90
@@wh1zze I'm thinking of the story of a guy who bought a 300hz monitor and used it at 60hz for 5 years without knowing it because he forgot to change the setting.
I know that story too, but I'm 101% sure I'm running my monitor at 280hz
Thank you for this comparison! Guys, maybe someone tested in virtual reality? Which modpack best optimizes the game for virtual reality?
that's a neat idea for a future video. I will happly help you in case you'll remain till that video is done.
Never forget that there is always a way to increase FPS in Minecraft, but to date there is no mod released that will fix the chunk loading issue in Minecraft. High FPS is good of course, but the most important thing is that the game does not freeze while the world is loading chunks, and yes, I will tell you a bitter truth; if your computer is not good enough (not everyone has a good computer) you will definitely experience a lag or freezing issue in Minecraft.
Thanks you so much❤❤ my computer is so noob it play minecraft on 10-20 fps(not have modpack) but when I install it is 70-80(Adernaline) fps Thank you❤❤
UR THE FIRST PERSON I SAW WITH MY SAME SKIN !!!!!!!!!!
:O I haven't changed my skin since I started playing Minecraft :)
Geiles video lol, ich hab natürlich auf Sodium+ gewettet, but oh well! xD
Come on 1k subs is just round the corner!!!
yesssssss
At 14:13 during the graph comparison, it may be a good idea to avoid using colors of the same shade to represent graph, such as both standing and running around as blue. Otherwise, good video.
I understand your request. different colours can make the graph pop and help the viewer understand what's going on. Thank You for pointing it out!❤❤
@@wh1zze why does this response look so AI
@@ledark2512Maybe the punctuation 🤔? Or the Politeness 😁
pretty underrated channel
i dont know if you know it or not but you couldn't set gui scale 3 on some of them is because when you are not in full screen you can only set it to 2, then after you fully exit settings and go back into them in full screen you can set the gui scale to 3.
Bro you make amazing videos! Everyone should subscribe to you nice video's!
Thanks very informative.
you're welcome!
remarkably optimized is the best
I'll check it out when I'll do a part 2
You can also remove Nvidium from any modpack that has it
thats true, you can!
i swear your audio made me think my computer was busted
Had a disclaimer at the beginning but still my bad
Cześć Polsko!
Cześć Rumunio!
as a modpack maker, i guess it's my time to shine with new optimized modpack.. 😏
Yessir 👍🏻
Bros startup sodium plus fps is better than my fps with the best modpack, not even startup🔥
bro can you told differncies fabolously optimized bs vulkan with other optimizations mod sorry my emglish bad
I Would like to see the difference with all the modpacks having like 200 mods.....this will be accurate
You should compare them using the same render distance, and measure the fps with another program like Nvidia FrameView, to avoid the effect of F3 over fps.
0:57 MY COUNTRY
@@Axolotlowy_fan Czech Republic :)
@@wh1zze.... Poland
polska mentioned RAAAAAAH
@@wh1zze WHAT THE HEXK
Theres another really good modpack THAT contain 30 mods which Is called remarkably optimized, i get tons of FPS with it
2nd part c;
resourcify is cool, but not really applicable to prism laucher, because prism has that functionality built in too. so having to load an extra mod for something you dont use that often just seems wasteful. in the end, designing your own pack (which is really easy with prism!) is the best way to get a good balance between QoL and performance, and also a great learning opportunity!
Something i'd like to say is that nvidium only works for cards that got released after the rtx 2000 series because nvidium uses a feature that cards older than the rtx 2000 series don't have to optimise the game. For example i have a gtx 1060 so nvidium is useless for me.
that's unfair, u should use same settings like chunk and detail setting. ofcourse you will get 100 when you play 32 chunk to 32 simulated chunk.
you should test Remarkably Optimized.
Using the f3 screen for gps actually lowers your gps by quite a lot. Try and use msi afterburner or an fps display mod
man I got flashbacks to tayber seeing that skin
I used to make similar videos, I didn't knew he existed tho
@@wh1zze yeah I don't even know if he still uploads but I remember watching him many years ago
I went from 100fps in my base to 1000 fps with all of the mod packs some mods thrown out because they dropped fps but holy I actually thought my pc was just cooked
Just clicked on the video because if your super cool skin
Thank you 🙏🏻
Sugar optimization and Fabulously Optimized
best modpacks
thank you! I will bench mark your modpack in the follow up video
You forgot Breakneck Optimized, has most qol mods and pretty good fps
thank you for telling me! will definitely shoutout you in the follow up video i plan to make❤❤
There is a problem with nvidium, not everyone have nvidia gpus
We need someone to come up with something similar for amd and intel gpus
Correction simply optimized does have Iris support. I play with shaders all the time, and you can download all the mods that are in every other pack into simply optimized. It's not hard
But that is not simply optimized anymore, that is your own modpack
@@wh1zze I guess you could say that but in my opinion adding one or two mods doesn't change it into your own mod pack, but I do see what you're saying cuz when you download a modpack you expect everything to be there?
@@descend3rthat is generally what you do when comparing modpacks
that i9 9900 is holding you back big time
How come? At the time of the 2080 super that i have it was the best cpu, 8 cores st 5.2 ghz is really good enough to run a 4080 in games without any bottleneck
@@wh1zzeGhz is a largely useless metric. It's like the RPM of a car. It just tells you the RPM of your engine and that's all. You can't compare RPM across cars.
The 9900k is a fine cpu, in a cpu bound game like minecraft it can hold back most modern gpus with ease though.
A 4080 would especially be a stretch with a decent chunk of titles at sub 4k
Obviously but the i9 9900k is still a capable cpu and if you play at 4k a 4080 isnt a stretch
@@wh1zze I wouldn't say it's THAT good. But technically, yes. But specifically for Minecraft the newer the cpu, the better, since it uses single core. Even with sodium and all, the cpu is still the most important part for maxing those frames in Minecraft.
I'm not trying to say it's bad, but you would get more frames with in Minecraft specifically. I mean the 13900k has almost double the single threaded performance. And the i3 14100 is almost 1.5x better single threaded performance
performium is bad, it has so many optimization mods that it does lag spikes every 10 seconds that last 1 minute
Those aren't lag spikes, it's the video editing because I was stuttering a lot and had to cut that out. But you're right, performium isn't the best
@@wh1zze no, i mean when i played with it i got lag spikes
i noticed them too
@@NovaCraftRealest Me too
I have a rx580 and i7 3770 and I play FO with fancy graphics with 16 chunks in 1000+ fps and if I lower the chunks to 8 I get 1600+ fps
it may depends on a lot of factors such as actually recording a video, general pc configuration, game version, ram allocations, background processes, cooling and power. the sake of the video was to compare all the modpacks on this same platform.
With Fabulously Optimized i got around 210 fps on average but with Performium i only got around 80-100 on average, for some reason.
i would say below 30 fps is hard to play
I know you might get this alot and may be annoyed, but for Minecraft I use Linux Mint, I also use Windows but not Minecraft on Windows. On vanilla Minecraft, I get 60+ FPS on Linux Mint, whereas on Windows I get barely 30. Nvidia drivers may be a bit funky but overall I just wanted to suggest possibly trying Linux for more frames if you haven't.
I actually don't get this a lot. But I do also use linux, mainly for school since I study IT, I'm obligated to learn 2 operating systems. But thank you so much for the insight I'll try Minecraft on linux out and I'll make a video on it.
Bro i use Fedora Silverblue Linux latest.
I use vulkan32x modpack from modrinth.This have 60-140more fps on my pc than performium.Performium has the best fps on my pc From sodium modpacks
Sorry my english is bad
My pc is radeon rx580 and amd Athlon 3000g
liked very much of your video but you need to get a new micro or some pad to put in front of it
Vro which one is best modpack??
yo for sodium plus increase ram usage to 10 or 16gb thats why it was lagging
Good idea, but shouldn't a ModPack install itself with the right amount of allocated ram? Like many other ModPacks do
SO is actually worse than FO for me because in FO there is a "reduce resolution on macos" option which cranked my fps up to 200+, in SO I get barely 60
pressing f 6 does that in vanilla im pretty sure
Has to be new probably
i dont know why but the modpack does nothing, only giving some cool features, when i turn on the shaders its still on 7 fps, i hate that
I'm sorry to hear your experience. I am currently working on making my own modpack using all the optimization mods + some tips. If that cant help nothing will.
@@wh1zze Bro, when will your modpack be ready? I only believe you
@@ЕбатьаяКизунаАИ a month from now?
@@wh1zze i think this is just bcz my computer is too bad
if you get low fps with shader its about your pc not the game at all
I saw the whole vid.... But didnt understand which is the best mod for optimization and have other mods too....
wHY WOULDNT YOU CHANGE THE RENDERDISTANCE TO BE THE SAME THINK
allooo
these are my specs =)
CPU Intel i5-8265U @ 1.60GHz 1.80 GHz
RAM 8 GB
GPU Nvidia GeForce MX230
I know, not the best. But i've started an Aternos Fabric 1.21.1 server with some friends, we havent played in some time and most of us have pretty low-end pcs. what modpack could you recommend for us to use roughly based on my specs? to mention, we do have a light medieval-ish modpack running alongside the server that's been tested and it works fine. Though i do seem to experience lag spikes every so often while playtesting the server
any guidance please? kinda hard to choose from so many optimisation modpacks out there =)
I get high average fps but my game is stuttering so bad and its very often, mostly when generating chunks, i play with the remarkably optimized modpack, nvidium on with 64 chunks
Try allocating the game more ram, closing backround tasks or moving the game to an ssd, if nothing works check the ingame settings, turn down the render distance and a vod mod to get 64 chunks, make sure vsync is off and make sure you dont have any mods you dont need other than that idk... Try optifine maybe :)
Imma merge every single modpack of optimization into one so i can have the most performance
for some reason, when using any of these mod packs, i can barely get over 100 fps, and i cant even get 60 with shaders. i have an amd ryzen 9 5950x, rtx 3080ti, and 64 gb of ram, so theres absolutely no way my pc isnt good enough to do it, but i dont know what im doing wrong
What are your chunks set to anything over 24 is hard to run. Also disable vsync and allocate minecraft more ram, by default its 2 gb which is not enough for this many modpacks
@@wh1zze i have render distance set to 12, vsync off, and i have 32gb allocated
is it only in minecraft?
@@wh1zze yeah, other games run fine
Then it might be an old or faulty java install, delete java and reinstall the latest and run minecraft with that, alternatively vulkan mod runs great with newer systems you can also try that
shouldve also tested additive since you tested fabulously optimized
Will do in part 2 :)
Does fabulously optimized work well on an intel graphics card?
It generally should since it's just using regular Vulkan or OpenGL renderers.
I recommend using vulkan mod cuz arc gpus suck on opengl
For me fabulously optimize runs the best. But I think it's because I don't have a nivida card. I am using intel hd graphics.
thats exactly the reason I showcase multiple modpacks. there is not a certain best one, it depends on your pc ❤❤
@@wh1zze ye. Thx for making banger videos
Hi do you know anything about lunar client? The fps I get from that is insane but I’m not sure what sort of optimizations they use.
They still use optifine but im guessing you're using lunar for 1.8.9 which is generally a much more lightweight version of the game
@@wh1zzethere is a modpack for 1.8.9 i found recently called “Max FPS” and it’s really the only good fps modpack on 1.8.9 that actually includes a sufficient amount of mods, i would mention it if you made a part 2 as i couldn’t recommend it enough
Look it up on modrinth
I use vulkan32x modpack from modrinth.This have 60-140more fps on my pc than performium.Performium has the best fps on my pc From sodium modpacks
Vulkan is much better optimized than the current renderer that Minecraft uses which is OpenGL
@@wh1zze 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
hello just a question, does Nvidium count as an Optimization ModPack? I am only asking this because I saw a few videos on it and it looks quite promising.
@@ashqmed yes it does but note that nvidium is a mod not a modpack
its a mod, not a modpack
to see what you actually get without f3 menu you look at the very 1st number of the fps when it first shows up thats the real fps
yes but if i use f3 in all of them its also a fair comparison
for me simply optimized with zoomify and any other mods u want is the best modpack for fps
Yessss
Why dont just install or combine the mods yourself and get all the benefits? Best performance and qol mods
how do i make distant horizons + iris less laggy
you can try by lowering the render quality and distance also allocate more of your cpu to distant horizons
distant horizon sucks overrated mod makes the game unplayable and doesnt even load the chunks
@@huggywuggy594?
I have an nvidia gpu but I can’t use nvidium because my gpu doesn’t support mesh shaders.
(I have 1050ti)
Ohhhh, makes sense. I forgot to specify or actually research what Nvidia GPUs it works with. That's my fault
@@wh1zze I’m pretty sure most/all modern nvidia gpus support it, so usually it’s fine. But for those of us with older cards, we gotta double check
It doesn't work on my 1060 6gb either :(
@@wh1zzenext video on this topic, I suggest you include that nvidium only works with opengl mesh shaders, which only works on 16xx series and newer
In my opinion I get all 4 mod packs and use all of the mods 🤷♂️
as someone who averages on 40fps or 60fps depending what im playing, what is the actual difference??
I want one for forge
Bro my pc is ass I can't even run vanilla minecraft. When i run performance modpacks i get 40 to 65 fps😭
Specs:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4570 CPU @ 3.20GHz
RAM: 16 GB
Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705
Chipset: GeForce GT 705
Total Memory: 10 GB
Dedicated Memory: 2.0 GB
the i5 4750 and gt 705 is why 💀
Daniel give me coffee
I see you have lossless scaling, can you benchmark it on minecraft, with shaders, and without?
I will consider your request in the follow up episode planned to release soon.❤❤
I'm going to play Minecraft at version 1.20.4 should I get Performiun 1.0.8 or 1.0.0?
Why are there no good Vulkan modpacks like Vulkan is sooo good and doesn't crash that often now
Nice vid
which is the best? SODIUM, RUBIDIUM, EMBEDDIUM, NVIDIUM or fabously optimize
you are listing both mods and modpacks
"don't use modpacks with nvidium if you don't have an nvidia gpu" is misinformation, nvidium just disables itself on unsupported systems
Try Wing optimization modpack!
Thanks for your request I will consider it in the next video!