MJJC Pro Foam Cannon VS MJJC S 3.0 Foam Cannon!! There Is A Difference For Me!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.พ. 2024
  • In this video, I share my comparison between the new MJJC S 3.0 and the MJJC Pro foam cannons. MJJC Foam Cannon S V3.0 is newly released.The price, performance, and features of that foam cannon make it the best value in my opinion. But MJJC just launched a new Foam Cannon... The MJJC S v3.0. The S line actually sits one tier below the Pro line, but with some pretty cool new features and an awesome redesign i wanted to put these two head to head and see how they compare. Equipped with Thicker Snow Foam Technology, it makes an even thicker, creamy foam like shaving foam.
    1/4 Inch Quick Connector Adapter included. Can be attached to "Karcher PS Series" that adopts 1/4 Inch Quick Connect. (K1700, K1700 Cube, K1800PS, K1800PS Cube, K1900PS, K2100PS, K2300PS) Cannot be connected to Karcher K2, K3, K4, K5, or K7.
    MJJC S 3.0 Foam Cannon...www.amazon.com/s?k=MJJC+Foam+...
    Operating pressure range: 1300 psi to 3600 psi; please use different orifice nozzles depending on the pressure performance of the high-pressure cleaner. (The higher the pressure, the larger diameter orifice nozzle required.) 1.25mm orifice nozzle (1600-2200psi) is pre-connected to the main body.
    If the pressure of the high-pressure cleaner is 1300-1600 psi, replace the nozzle with the included 1.1 mm orifice nozzle. If using with the high-pressure cleaner at 2200 psi or higher, replace with a 1.35mm or larger orifice nozzle (sold separately).
    Follow The Apex Detail Support Group on Face Book for any questions, concerns or if you are in need of general detailing knowledge whatsoever!! / 946245059134747
    Follow Apex Detail on INSTAGRAM for more exciting projects!!
    / apexautodetail
    www.apexautosurfaceprotection...
    Apex Detail Support Group (FaceBook) / 9462450
    #foamcannon #mjjcfoamlance #autodetailing
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 80

  • @apexdetail85
    @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Do you use a foam cannon? Which is your favorite?

    • @Carlos.Rivera
      @Carlos.Rivera 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Griots Brilliant foam cannon. It come 1.1 orifice installed and works well with cheap electric pressure washers. Big mouth so less mess adding chemicals and stainless steel ball in the straw.

    • @richardseem7948
      @richardseem7948 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tri nova and pro..

    • @dtna
      @dtna 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know why they went with the narrow base. I don't like the idea of the bottle being less stable.

    • @240sxdriver
      @240sxdriver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      MJJC 3.0 blows away my old MTM foam cannon. Also easier on the ears compared to some cheap foam cannons with their higher pitched induction noises.
      The aeration is a noticeable difference like you've experienced in the video so I can turn down the mixture knob a bit up top.
      Please try out the original orifice as well!

    • @UndressforAndres
      @UndressforAndres 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Carlos.Riverasame liked it better than mjjc and mtm it’s stout

  • @archiepezek
    @archiepezek 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks for the comparison Brian. I have the MJJC V2.0 and I love it. I, like you, want my foam to move down the panel and take the dirt with it. Also, the older version has a wider base which I prefer.

  • @SaddyTaz
    @SaddyTaz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Brian for another great video. I got mine a month ago but due to the cold weather here in New York, I haven't got a chance to foam my car with it yet. Can't wait any longer!

  • @gnawty4662
    @gnawty4662 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The shop is looking BEAUTIFUL! What a turn around 👏

  • @Jayb21724
    @Jayb21724 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Appreciate the time for another great video! Keep those comparisons going!

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, will do!

  • @coreymerritt7742
    @coreymerritt7742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have the version 2 pro been working great love the foam thanks Brian

  • @millerdetailing4176
    @millerdetailing4176 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video review and comparison Brian, thank you.

  • @DetailsNMe
    @DetailsNMe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I use the MJJC Pro 2 with my active 2.0 and together they feel like Gods gift 🎁….I have yet to try the version 3; but until my Pro 2 falls part…I’m completely satisfied with the level of foam I obtain with my unit 😊 great video!! And gorgeous vehicles!!!

  • @bhcamaro2002
    @bhcamaro2002 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ive had the 2.0 for 2 years it still works great!

  • @wescat2
    @wescat2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You could definitely tell a difference. I too like the runnier foam. That is the perfect consistency for an alkaline pre-wash.

  • @bryanjohnson665
    @bryanjohnson665 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My guess is if both were brand new, they'd be nealry identical. The older model likely has some clogging or deposits on the screen and filter based on the amount of usage. I'd say you can't go wrong with either. Got my pro a few years ago for $55.

  • @limoman4125
    @limoman4125 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My cannon is cheap one!! I said i will up grade when it starts failing. So far so good. And it's always a pleasure spending time with u also!!

  • @ShineYourLightDetailing
    @ShineYourLightDetailing 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent comparison Brian, I have the PRO V2 and love it. 👍🏼👍🏼

  • @Rob12345
    @Rob12345 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I just bought the MJJC pro and I love it !

  • @chriskiefer5132
    @chriskiefer5132 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love these informative videos. Ty.

  • @dougmasters3875
    @dougmasters3875 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the S 3.0 purely because it was a little cheaper than the Pro. I've been super happy with it compared to the el cheapo Amazon lances. I learned two things in this video: a) I needed to change the jet, b) the marks on laundry detergent cups are ounces.

  • @micd9256
    @micd9256 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use the MJJC pro regularly. Had to replace the metal screens and foam piece after about 2 years and it’s back to new. Planning to try the 3.

  • @icurt06
    @icurt06 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use an Armour All foam cannon. I had to put thread tape on the cup to stop it from falling apart when using it. Not much foam more of a runny soap that runs down the vehicle. The MJJJC would be a nice upgrade! Thanks for the video

  • @kennythomsonjr5553
    @kennythomsonjr5553 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They both look great. Can't go wrong with either

  • @steveclark2426
    @steveclark2426 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just got the MJJC 3 and I have vey hard water. I find I have to use slot of soap. So far armour detail has given me the best results with less foam. I appreciate the solid build and clear bottle of the 3.

  • @richardseem7948
    @richardseem7948 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video and product review and comparison good friend

  • @carlosorengo1809
    @carlosorengo1809 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awsome video, I will use, for the first foaming the PRO with the runny foam first to have the dirt run down first and then when I am ready for the contact wash I will use the new version because you will have more time before the foam dissipate.

  • @elithegreat6463
    @elithegreat6463 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Shop Manager made a surprise inspection , you're lucky it came out well. 😋

  • @johngriffiths3394
    @johngriffiths3394 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use the MJJC Pro 2 on an Ava Smart pressure washer P60 for home use- no complaints. Bilt Hamber Touch-less snow foam, just the best on earth for dirt removal. (Your Lambo is gorgeous.)

  • @bigd9848
    @bigd9848 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good comparison Brian 👊🏼You can get a water filter system for the shop they run about $350 if you have water that is not too good. I have one it is very good to have.Thanks again for the video 👊🏼💎

  • @middlegaautomotivedetailin1350
    @middlegaautomotivedetailin1350 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the V3. I use it about 10 times a week!

  • @paulreichelt1259
    @paulreichelt1259 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Check out that gorgeous Poison Ivy HSV Commodore in the background.

  • @tracyenglish9998
    @tracyenglish9998 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The new foam cannon has a newer screen in it, that may be why it's a little thicker foam

  • @Enthusiast_detailing
    @Enthusiast_detailing 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve been eying those Mjjc they seem like some of the best foam cannons

  • @60trickpa
    @60trickpa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the old MJJC Pro foam gun with the runnier foam it is what I use. The attachment on the 3. is nice idea

  • @ddautodetailing
    @ddautodetailing 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have both foam cannons, and each are great. I do need to get a new filter for one of them!

  • @wademiyataki9221
    @wademiyataki9221 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks like the Shop Manager is ready to go home.😁

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She certainly was!

  • @davidboyce6427
    @davidboyce6427 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    👀What. You got an Aussie car! So cool Holden a GM collaboration right? So cool.

    • @paulreichelt1259
      @paulreichelt1259 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you zoom in it still looks right hand drive?..

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a right hand drive imported from Aus.

  • @JeepJL
    @JeepJL 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’d be willing to bet if you put new metal and fiber filters into the Pro V2 the performance between the two would have been identical. Conversely, after using the S V3.0 for some time, I bet you’d get the exact same results as your current Pro V2.

  • @dthomson409
    @dthomson409 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh my god a Holden wagon!

  • @swoldierjan5332
    @swoldierjan5332 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The filter is just newer on the S line that’s why it’s producing a thicker foam. If both were new, they’d produce the same quality foam.

  • @kidservant
    @kidservant 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Question - I enjoy detailing my black, GMC Yukon every 1.5 - 2 weeks. I really liked Turtle wax, "Max Wax" followed with "Flex Wax". Beautiful depth and gloss. I recently found out about the dangers of graphene oxide in the body, its really bad, and I will no longer be using or purchasing graphene products. Im pretty focused on Ceramic products now. Because I detail so often, I dont need a super long lasting product, but I do want depth, shine, protection and ease of use. Do you have some suggestions to replace Max Wax & Flex Wax that doesnt have graphene? Thank for your input!

  • @dvlop0018
    @dvlop0018 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I still have a soft heart for that Lamborghini. Foam canon, original seems to spread nicer.
    That glossy paint is just awesome.

  • @c.javier1203
    @c.javier1203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice! Just ordered my 3.0 … don’t have a Lambo, but looking forward to using it on my G80 M3. Also, what wheels are those?

  • @Carlos.Rivera
    @Carlos.Rivera 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Shop looks promising 👌

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It is slowly getting there.

    • @kimnewling5728
      @kimnewling5728 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Looks great!

  • @AntEloftheHouseofEl
    @AntEloftheHouseofEl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another good video Brian.
    What I'm seeing appears to be aeration.
    The S appears to be lighter and more airy than the Pro.
    When was the last time you descaled or changed the gauze filter?
    I have water harder than Rocky Balboa and I notice a HUGE difference when I descale my cannon.
    Like night and day difference.

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is truly way overdue.

    • @AntEloftheHouseofEl
      @AntEloftheHouseofEl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@apexdetail85 guess that's it then!
      Do wish they'd redesign so you don't need to do a total strip down to get to the gauze.
      Thats the one major flaw I've found with every cannon I've seen.

  • @nyernga
    @nyernga 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do both cannons have the same size orifice?

  • @norcalspitshine6406
    @norcalspitshine6406 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice

  • @jimflanagan6029
    @jimflanagan6029 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice Lamborghini Brian 👍 NJ fan.

  • @Chris-wb7ni
    @Chris-wb7ni 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use an MTM. Which do you prefer Brian

  • @Kiki099
    @Kiki099 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I own both I use the 3.0 more the only thing I didn't like about the 3.0 is that it leaks if it's on it's side or upside down.

  • @johnp6987
    @johnp6987 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The S line is more foamy. I wonder if you would need to work out a new PIR with a cannon upgrade and I have the Pro one but only use it around once a month so it will last for ages even with hard water😄

  • @KotakaSRT
    @KotakaSRT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    which one do you preffer?

  • @markbenno
    @markbenno 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been considering these lances for some time but how do you recommend cleaning them out? Also what methods do you use on the fabric roof too maintain?

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Descale them regularly with CLR. I use Angelwax Excelsior for soft tops.

    • @markbenno
      @markbenno 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@apexdetail85 right ok and do you seal them with anything like fabsil?

  • @motiOn732
    @motiOn732 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Orifice size is based on flow, not pressure

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Does it not take pressure to get the water to flow through the orifice?:)

    • @motiOn732
      @motiOn732 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@apexdetail85 I'm not an expert in this but from what I understand, if you have a high flow machine (which it sounds like you do) with a small orifice, you're going to be pushing more water through a smaller hole which will strain the pump.

  • @daveparker8019
    @daveparker8019 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At the end of the day, which is your go to

  • @MNpicker
    @MNpicker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I see foam... thats the objective 😎👌

  • @kennythomsonjr5553
    @kennythomsonjr5553 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new one seems to make much thicker, better quality foam

  • @unacarafea567
    @unacarafea567 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great..... A new foam cannon works better than an old one with corroding parts. I think I guessed that before the start of the video LOL.....

  • @kimnewling5728
    @kimnewling5728 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have an MTM PF22 cannon. Thick foam looks cool, but I like mine with foam of a lower viscosity. I've seen videos with these 2 cannons before, but your video is more fun.
    When you say cannon clugs up, what actually clogs up? Is it fixable? Thanks, Brian.

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I need to descale it...change screens.

  • @richardseem7948
    @richardseem7948 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imo the pro works better.like you stated pro is runny and thats my perferd method

  • @weSteh
    @weSteh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is the Holden owner an Aussie Brian?

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not that I know of....bought it from one however.

  • @tylerfj24
    @tylerfj24 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ill bet you had extremely old filters in the PRO vs the brand New S model..

  • @1stfrompuertorico568
    @1stfrompuertorico568 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    First!!!!

  • @nypigskin
    @nypigskin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, this was a waste of time. You compared an old clogged up cannon to a new one. The water to soap ratio is not calibrated with the knob on top of the guns. These are pretty much the same guns with different bottles.