Blind Camera Test: Round 2 | Sony FX9, A7s III, F65 and Panasonic S1H
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ก.พ. 2021
- Today we are testing and comparing 4 cameras: Sony F65, Sony FX9, Sony A7s III, and Panasonic S1H. In this video I will take you through the different stages of the Digital Imaging process to show the differences of each camera to see how the stack up from the manufacturer and ultimately see if they can match.
Each of these cameras share very different price ranges, but is their image quality as different as their price tag?
*It is recommended that you play along and see if you can identify the cameras featured in the video before the answers given at the end.
CAMERA SETTINGS:
Sony F65 (S35)
- 4K DCI (8K Oversample)
- Sony F65 RAW SQ
- f/2.8
- ISO 500
- Xeen 35MM
Sony FX9 (FF)
- UHD (6K Oversample)
- ProRes HQ (Atomos Shogun 7)
- f/4
- ISO 800
- Sigma Art 24-70mm
Sony A7s III
- UHD
- ProRes HQ (Atomos Shogun 7)
- f/3.5
- ISO 640
- Sigma Art 24-70mm
Panasonic S1H (FF)
- UHD (6K Oversample)
- ProRes HQ (Atomos Shogun 7)
- f/3.5
- ISO 640
- Sigma art 24-70mm
(not in order of appearance)
As always, technology is ever evolving so it is important to identify if our urge to acquire certain gear is actually something that we actually need vs something that we just want.
Don't forget to LIKE and SUBSCRIBE for more videos like this. - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
C & D took the cake for me
Same
I ended up at a toss up between B and D, so F65 or FX9. I think I know which one I can more easily afford lol
Very helpful test.
I also ended up with B or D. Especially the reflection on her forehead was the smoothest on D. Before the correction A looked very weird and C very cold and digital.
Amazing Work 👍
c is better and is s1h, but is the camera that you have corrected badly uniforming it to bad sony colors..... in wrong direction so the much neutral pink skin tones become yellowish dark! Good test however
The magenta cast of Panasonic spilled the bean.
C is the clear winner. 2nd best skin, best hair, overal best grain jut not graded correctly or if its not touched, still pretty good. D had slightly better highlight detail in the skin but lost out in other areas. Also C actually retains colours and separates them better. Others look warm washed. The last set shows the highllight strengths of C and D and also the accurate hair colour of C. Also the last set you can see the almost exact look of human skin on C. Also I noticed C looks the least foggy and cleanest separation. D is also pretty good. Thank you for sharing. Fun test.
Great Test! I think Panasonic's rec-709 is probably closer the actual colors in frame, which for me personally is what I'd want from a manufacturer's color science before deciding on a grade and look. But they all look equally great to me! I think sony's lut has a more cinematic feel to it.
S1h good job
In C, the color and contrast of the woman's face is very successful. In D and B, the depth of field is very successful.
This is pretty interesting. Can you post unprocesed the camera clips for download?
Thanks for the test. It was pretty obvious once the LUT was applied (but before they were "corrected") that C was the S1H. Definitely cooler with a more magenta tint. After adding the LUT and the Color Correction, much harder to tell them apart. It would have been interesting if you had showed the shots in reverse order, meaning, starting the video off by showing the shots that have been graded first, then go to the shots that had the LUT applied but not graded, then go to the shots that were still in LOG and had yet to have the LUT applied.
C panasonic s1h?
A B are my fav!
The Panasonic stood out💪🏽 I liked the FX6 the least and F65 the best. The SH1 held its own.
B, C.
So which one is which? I think A and D look best. ?
The F65 shot natively 8k raw file, or it shot a 4k raw file that can be upscaled with a specific Sony software ?
C is S1H, there were some lights flickering in the back
Great test. Thanks. To me C looked like it had sharpening applied. Less organic. Thought it was the A7s iii before seeing what it actually was.... B looked best I found..
Funny enough looking at it again I feel A is indeed a bit oversharpened too. B and also D looked best to my eye.. But now maybe I am influenced by knowing which camera is which :-).
B looked the worst to me.
I chose C. They are all so damn close...but yes, my eyes kept gravitating towards C
C is better
B and C stood out for their sharpness and colour respectively
C looked best!
u should have just labeld the cameras in each box, who wants to play back and forth your description if u could already have it on screen
For you to decide which pic you like the most without having the bias from their names
B is the best due to its HDR.
B, that shutter and DR stand out.
shutter? what do you mean? does F65 have a mechanical shutter? how do you perceive the difference in an image that has practically no movement?
@@phrasalsyntax Check the practicals top frame left. You can see a weird flicker-banding when you look at it. F65 is the smoothest of the lot.
@@ricardobirnbaum very interesting, thanks for the reply. Indeed, F65 has the less flicker-bandin of all, though it still has some of it. Do you think there is a way to totally cancel it? Once you detect it is very distracting an unfilmic. For example, by changing the shutter speed in small fractions from whatever it was (24, 30) so it is out of synchrony with the practicals or whatever is the source of the flickering?
@@phrasalsyntax Well, that is up to the gaffer and DP to figure out. It could be a defective bulb, a frequency issue, ground issue, shutter angle... I´ve had this from small LED lights that have a small screen on the back. The camera feels the flicker from the rear screen, not from the actual LED´s. Yes, it is very distracting in the pro-sumer cameras in the test. These little detais are what differentiates cameras and the experience you get when watching content on them. Other artifacts like rolling shutter on panning can add up to that effect and make the whole thing less enjoyable... if you know the limitations of your camera, work around them and shoot with those in mind. This test is a blind test. Not aiming to control those things.... and a very good test at showcasing each camera.
B and c
B is BETTER
B !!!!
FX9 - the best
The Panasonic and A7S were the best and is the cheapest.
And F65 shoot 16bit raw so log doesn’t matter
As far as I know, in most cameras that record raw, 16-bit linear-raw (sensor acquisition data) is converted and recorded as 12-bit log-raw in camera.
The grading cannot be trusted and is very inconsistent, can’t you do a simple ACES/color space transform and make the testing consistent
All over the place, not consistent, not a very good camera body test