Thank you for educating the lot, Sire. The topic you covered here of high-passing the mains is the single most significant one to clear the main’s low end, regardless of whether one connects a subwoofer or not.
Technically, unless you have low and high pass filters at the pre-amp (adding more processing to the signal) the cables will have all frequencies going through them anyway. If you bi-amp, with the correct filters, then you can maybe get more benefit, but I have always found it more plecebo effect than real world effect with those smaller speakers. Maybe I am just old, or haven't heard it done quite right :) Some amps have an LFE out with a built in cross-over, sometimes adjustable (even some two channel amps) . Anyone sending that LFE to a powered sub-woofer is really running "bi amp" as the LFE is being amplified by the sub, and the main speakers amplified by your main amp. Like you mentioned in the video, this is where it really has the best effect. Having a subwoofer and main speakers
Where can I find the inline RCA filter you had in your hand. Also how to you calculate the capacitance needed for the speakers to get the proper rolloff?
I heard Kevin Voelks (sp) from Revel speakers. He wrote the white paper on bi-wiring. He said it was his biggest mistake, and regrets it. This video did a good job explaining it.
So what I understand is freeing up your full range drivers on a two way speaker to only reproduce mids will give it a better Fidelity and volume because it will not be moving in the lower ranges but will be functioning in the mid range only so the bass can reproduce lows or in more non-directional Bass? And if so I have a pair of yumi fives made by Kanto a powered main speaker output to the right channel and low level sub output is there a crossover that I can put inline that is low voltage to not use the internal cross over because the main speakers when connected my subs is still producing lower lows then I think they should. And possibly affecting the mid range sound since meds are produced through them also. Thanks
6:55 the main idea of passive bi amping is sound quality, not more power. its to gain sq and control for the upper freq drivers with its own amp. and mitigate feedback between drivers
@@7966016 Since the tweeter is said to not use much power, could I use these 2 amps I have to bi amp just the woofer of my floor standing? It can take 200 watts and I have 2 amps that both give about 50 each. I was going to biamp to get 100 watts into the speaker but I guess that would be wasted on the tweeter. idk
I recently acquired a new pair of Paradigm Founder Series 100F loudspeakers. They're the first pair of speakers I've ever owned that have two sets of binding posts and I was looking at biwire speaker cables for the first time in my audio geek career. But I don't think so any more. This is the first rational, well-reasoned explanation I've heard for NOT biwiring.
I found Bi wiring on my speakers did make a difference, I was surprised, I wasn't expecting it. Did it only to try it . I'm leaving it Bi wired, I like it.
This happened with me too. JBL Studio 590’s running off a Rogue Cronus Magnum. Used some cheap biwiring cables and was shocked at the difference in bass response. I’m usually a doubter and I was really surprised
Hey Danny, how about covering how to make that RCA highpass filter box? I'd love to have one of those for a ported DIY sub I'm working on. Also, a single video on 1st through 4th order highpass and Linkwitz-Riley, Butterworth, etc and the differences between them.
I have never heard any appreciable difference between any decent to good quality cable. The only night and day upgrade in sound that nobody talks about that I have heard is with bi-amping. The gain in not in the electrical load; the gain is within the division of frequency division. This is why electronic cross overs yield superior results.
@@thomprd 1) Magnepan 3.7 with 4 REL S510 subs in stereo line arrays and JBL HF compression drivers/ 3,200W triamped, Bryston power/ Parasound preamp. 2) Castle Winchester dual transmission line speakers/ Accuphase E280 (living room system) 3) "Studio" 10.4.4 atmos pro monitoring system. (14) JBL studio monitors (4) REL subs, Anthem AVM90 processor. 21'x15' custom built control room 4) Tannoy System12 DMT dual concentric studio monitors, 1,200W biamped with Crown power Input sources: Linn LP 12, Revox PR99, Edirol Pro4 digital recorder, Alesis 24 track hard disk, Cambridge CVN2 and Node2 streamers, multiple CD players What systems do you have to compare "good" and "decent" cables?
To bi-amp speakers, you really need to put electronic crossovers in between the preamp and power amp stages. Years ago I had some big Altec Lansings that could be be bi-amped. Altec support gave me the appropriate crossover frequencies and I had a custom dual electronic crossover made especially for the Altecs. The internal crossover was disconnected. The crossover for the woofer rolled-off the high frequencies(not the low ones), and the crossover for the tweeter rolled-off the low frequencies. You definitely don't want low frequencies going to the tweeter. It sounded great. Simply just hooking up two power amps - one to the woofer and one to the tweeter is not true bi-amping and you will hear no real benefit.
I’ve been using LINN systems since 1986 and fully active since 1988. They have dedicated electronic filters for each speaker model and amplifier type, typically a pair of cards fitted into a power amp. My Keltik speakers have eight input sockets on the back because of the dual Isobarik bass drivers (so four channels of amplification per speaker) I’m currently running them with two four channel amps. But have moved up to the klimax EXAKTBOX (with the new ORGANIK DAC) which performs the DAC and crossover functions and has XLR line outs to the power amps for 0:04 treble mid and bass.
You can still bi-amp with a passive crossover on each of the tweeter and woofer. Many speakers have the crossover separated. Use two amplifiers. It's still bi-amping.
@@David_Span That's true but for reasons I no longer remember it was said that it is better to use active electronic crossovers between the preamp and amp stage than passive crossovers after the amp stage.
@@donaldwilson5693 Yes, it could be better, avoiding the losses in inductors in particular -- just saying that it is still bi-amping with passive crossovers, and possibly more accessible for many audiophiles.
@@David_Span I think they also reduce IM distortion more compared to passive ones. Active crossovers will obviously cost more and they must be designed to the speaker manufacture's specifications.
...except that Danny says the current increases as the cone excursion increases. The cone excursion doubles as frequency halves (or excursion halves as frequency doubles) without a change in current. Also, part of the reason you can't see the motion of the cone at 80Hz is 80Hz is nearly faster motion than the eye can see and probably faster than the refresh rate of the video.
I did so by installing the free SONEQ VST plugin for Audirvana player. I set Hipass to 50 Hz and I have new Elac 203.2 speakers. Thank you and greetings from Poland.
I did managed to get two identical amplifiers some years back (Ashly FET-1500M) and used them for my stereo setup. It does have the easy to use function to use both amp in the same chassis as either BTL or parallel mode. Tried that for biamping and really didn't felt that much difference, but had a lot of fun running it in BTL mode at full blast for a short while. I thank my neighbors for not noticing the noise (or really good apartment insulation), and since I do not need the BTL power most of the time, I went back to old fashioned bi-amping. I "think" it sounds slightly better at normal listening volume when not in BTL, but haven't spend any time really testing that out. I did hear much better bass after I tossed the speaker spike and replaced them with sound care spikes, and replacing tin-plated speaker wire with copper ones really improved sound too... I'm not touching any tin plated wires after that...\
Those Ashly Audio amps are a well kept secret. They used to use them in movie theaters. I powered Infinity Kappa 8's with those while everyone else was spending 1000's. I still have mine somewhere ?
More and more streaming systems, particularly one-box things, are doing this in software now for the same reason. You can manually apply a high-pass filter at whatever frequency you like (within reason) to cut the current load for the main speakers and give it to your subwoofer. It just makes sense, but even more so now I've watched this.
Thats what I have done via my Bluesound node, could not believe my ears as the workload to the front left and right was eased by the sub and everything got so much clearer.
Bi-amping or tri-amping using active crossover could do wonders, but, and that is a big BUT, configuring such thing is not for the faint harted and takes a lot of experimentation and trial and error. Then you can get a parametric EQ into that equasion, and you are down the rabbit hole. What most people do not realise before going into bi/three amping/wiring is that sorting out room acoustics first will have much better results. Just my 2p worth....
If I remove the passive crossover from the speakers and duplicate the passive crossover frequencies with an active crossover, it doesn't change the room acoustics, but it removes the impedance of passive filters between the speakers and the amplifiers that produces dynamic compression distortion. The active crossover isn't sensitive to speaker impedance like the passive crossover is. Conceivably, I could duplicate the crossover frequencies and increase the slopes to 4th order Linkwitz-Riley and get better filter damping (better transient response, lower energy storage, less ringing), better speaker damping by the amplifier, lower dynamic compression, and reduce destructive interference between speakers. The only difficult part is matching the levels, which I should be able to do easily by ear.
That was not my experience, but then I'm using a DSP active crossover. It really is very easy with the mini-DSP system, and I played a bit with the Hypex GUI but I don't yet have their plate amps. I haven't tried the Dayton GUI. But even with camilladsp (no gui - say what you mean in config) it is trivial to make changes and test with REW. Where's the difficulty? After all, to design a passive crossover you have to understand target curves and addition of signals etc and achieving them is going to be harder - and as for aligning phase - its a nightmare. After all, with DSP I can just delay the tweeter to match the mid, then choose a textbook crossover without having to fudge delay with phase, and then if the tonal balance isn't to my liking I can add shelving, notching etc before the XO.
@@paulsebring6930 wouldn`t bi amping(with identical power amps) on passive xovers also have a good effect. the common argument against it is that the amps receive the full signal, but does this really matter? the amp(say for the tweeter) as far as I understand it.. won`t work with any of the signal that is restricted by the passive xovers anyway. so one end up with more control/power to each driver. especially the upper freq drivers who don`t have to compete with the woofer for current. then you also have the issue with feedback from the drivers that probably affect the sq of each other..with a regular single amp setup. with two amps wouldn`t the feedback/ringing between drivers be mitigated. ive tried vertical(one integrated power amp per speaker) bi amp myself with what seemed like a good positive effect. not blind tested though
Voice- and look-wise, you're like Alex Jones, Frank Kern, Dave Pensado and Leo Laporte... in one person! 😃 AND, even better: you share extremely interesting info! Thank you Danny! I just found your channel today, and your videos are like crack cocaine! I can't get enough of them! 🤗🙏🔥
Really interesting and informative video! Thanks for the first common sense I’ve encountered on this controversial subject. After much dithering I did bi-wire my Wharfedale floorstanders and I THINK there was a slight improvement but I reckon it’s purely down to doubling the copper area of the cables and so slightly reducing the resistance of the cabling. So there might be a perceptible beneficial effect with my particular Audiolab amp but I think there might just as easily be a slight disbenefit with another setup. Hifi is so full of snake oil, snobbery and incredible ignorance and I really appreciate your “engineer’s” viewpoint.
A point about biwiring - while the amp is still seeing the same load - the conditions in each wire *are* different. The split of frequencies does mean that each wire has different parts of the signal along it. So the effects of the back EMF from the woofer, for example, does interact with the signal to the tweeter, as well as different inductance and capacitance of the wires possibly being reduced, etc. So, possible differences in the resulting sound is conceivable.
@@dannyrichie9743 Right - I have some 8 wire braid similar to your cables, and they sound great. The bundle of 4 wires a side on mine are not small, and I can't imagine getting 12 into a tube connector is very easy.
With respect, the load the amplifier sees when connected to a speaker is a combination of the amp connectors, the cable itself and the speaker terminals in addition to any induced electrical interference picked up en route. By adding a second cable from the same amplifier source you are doubling up the effects that the amplifier sees before it even gets to the speaker which must, therefore, adversely effect the purity of the source signal and hence the sound from the speaker.
Back EMF from the speaker is a reaction to the EMF from the amplifier. Back EMF is opposition to the EMF. The back EMF is the why speaker impedance is higher than the DC resistance. The back EMF does not exceed the EMF and does not affect the parallel high frequency speaker circuit. The impedance of the high pass filter attenuates signals in the low frequency range of the back EMF. However, I don't think there are any bad affects to prevent biwiring. I would probably biwire if I had biamp capable speakers and an amplifier with parallel A B speaker switching. The only bad effect to biwiring would be two lengths of expensive speaker wire rather than one.
Very logical explanations but i tried biwiring on a integrated amp with a and b chanels and the sound was more open on bass, mids and highs, that was may experience.
I realize this video is 3 years old, but you glossed over the case where you have a pair of main speakers that produce sub-bass. I have B&W N801's and they measure flat down to 20Hz. I worked really hard to find a good amplifier for them (Levinson 333) and I've very often wondered if bi-amping would sound even better. I'm happy with where I'm at now, and probably done making changes to the system. Your recommendation of cutting low frequencies from the main speakers and adding subs isn't a direction I am going to take. For little bookshelves and RCA cable systems.. cool.. it's good advice.
I designed an upgrade for that speaker. Besides balancing out the response and making a huge improvement in parts quality, the lower woofer was powered by a subwoofer plate amp with variable phase, crossover, and gain controls to add a ton of flexibility to create a more balanced in room response.
I solved the problem by installing my THREE power amps inside an isolated compartment inside the speakers. Additionally in the compartment is a low power level 3-way crossover, “before, the power amps. My bass wires are about 10” of 8-gauge wire. The mid-range and tweeter are about 12” of 12-ga wire. Every thing is directly soldered. NO screws, lugs, connectors, etc.. High quality RCA cables are used from the Pre-amp directly to the speakers. The speaker end of the RCA cables have the ends removed and are soldered directly to the crossover. THD and IM are remarkably reduced. Should add speakers are individually compartmented and electronically frontally phased. They two speakers were new in 1975. The drivers are all Philips and have remained compliant.
Danny, although I have not tried single wire on my Vandersteen 2 speakers, I did read Vandersteen's explanation on how he came up with bi-wiring his speakers. It did make sense to me. Although you've probably read or heard his explanation, I thought I would include a copy & paste of that at the end of this comment. Hopefully you see this and have time to respond to it as I know you're swamped. I'd like to know your thoughts. On a side note, after I hooked those up and played them, I thought they weren't that great and went to bed. The next night I played them again and there was a tremendous difference. Before I hooked them up, they had been sitting for about 6 months. Given that I don't turn my system off, those speakers had 24 hours to "soak" in electrical system "hiss". I'm a substation technician and we allow big power transformers (such as 200 Megawatt 230 KV) to soak after energizing before attaching load to them after certain circumstances. I'm curious if you have noticed the same thing with speakers that I did? Letting electrical circuits soak gives those systems a chance to warm, electrons (I know this sounds weird) to charge up all the little voids, dips & valleys and give the system a chance fault before going live. Here is a copy and paste from Vandersteen's Q & A section: "What is bi-wiring and what are the advantages? Bi-wiring uses two separate sets of speaker cables to connect a single pair of loudspeakers to an amplifier. Coupled with a crossover designed specifically for bi-wiring, it offers many of the advantages of bi-amplifying the speakers with two separate amplifiers without the cost and complexity of two amplifiers. We began experimenting with bi-wiring back in the early '80s, an era when horizontal bi-amplification was considered the ultimate way to drive quality loudspeakers. (Horizontal bi-amplification used one amplifier to drive the low-frequency section of a speaker and a second amplifier to drive the high-frequency section.) We noted that speakers sounded better when bi-amplified by two amplifiers than when driven by a single amplifier. Surprisingly, this superior performance was evident even when the speakers were bi-amplified by two identical amplifiers at a low volume level and the amplifiers were each driven full-range without an electronic crossover. We initially believed that the double power supplies and other components of two amplifiers were responsible for the improvement, however building amplifiers with twice the power supply and doubling-up on other critical components failed to provide the bi-amplification benefit. So we looked at the speaker wires. With two amplifiers, bi-amplification used two sets of speaker cables so we experimented with doubling-up the speaker wires and with larger wire. Neither duplicated the bi-amplification improvements. Then we considered that in a bi-amplified system, one set of wires carries the low-frequencies and the other set of wires carries the high-frequencies. We modified a speaker's crossovers to accept two sets of cables and present different load characteristics to each set so that the low-frequencies would be carried by one set of wires and the high-frequencies by the other set of wires. Finally we heard the sonic improvements of bi-amplification with a single amplifier. Additional experiments with a Hall Effect probe revealed that high-current bass frequencies created a measurable field around the wires that expanded and collapsed with the signal. We believe that this dynamic field modulates the smaller signals, especially the very low level treble frequencies. With the high-current signal (Bass) separated from the low-current signal (Treble) this small signal modulation was eliminated as long as the cables were separated by at least an inch or two. (To keep the treble cable out of the field surrounding the bass cable.) The crossovers in Vandersteen bi-wirable speakers are engineered with completely separate high-pass and low-pass sections. The bass inputs pass low-frequencies to the woofers, but become more and more resistive at higher frequencies. The treble inputs pass high-frequencies to the midrange and tweeter, but become more and more resistive at low-frequencies. The output from the amplifier always takes the path of least resistance so deep bass frequencies go to the bass input (Low impedance at low-frequencies) rather than to the treble inputs (High impedance at low frequencies). For the same reason, treble frequencies go to the treble input (Low impedance at high-frequencies) rather than to the bass inputs (High impedance at high-frequencies). At the actual crossover frequency, the output from the amplifier would be divided equally between the two inputs as they would both have the same impedance at that frequency. Because of the different reflected impedances of the cables, the crossover between the woofer and midrange actually occurs at the wire ends where they connect to the amplifier. The benefits of bi-wiring are most obvious in the midrange and treble. The low-current signal to the midrange and tweeter drivers does not have to travel on the same wire as the high-current woofer signal. The field fluctuations and signal regeneration of the high-current low-frequencies are prevented from distorting or masking the low-current high-frequencies. The back EMF (Electro-Mechanical Force) from the large woofer cannot affect the small-signal upper frequencies since they do not share the same wires. The effects of bi-wiring are not subtle. The improvements are large enough that a bi-wire set of moderately priced cable will usually sound better than a single run of more expensive cable. All the cables in a bi-wire set must be the same. There is often great temptation to use a wire known for good bass response on the woofer inputs and a different wire known for good treble response on the midrange/tweeter inputs. This will cause the different sonic characteristics of the two wires in the middle frequencies to interfere with the proper blending of the woofer and midrange driver through the crossover point. The consistency of the sound will be severely affected as the different sounding woofer and midrange drivers conflict with each other in the frequency range where our ears are most sensitive to sonic anomalies. The disappointing result is a vague image, a lack of transparency through the midrange and lower treble and a loss of detail and clarity. Some of the benefits of bi-wiring are from the physical separation of the high-current bass and low-current midrange/tweeter wires. So-called bi-wire cables that combine the wires in one sheath do not offer the full advantages of true bi-wiring although they may be an excellent choice for mono-wiring the speakers. The cables should all be the same length. This is not due to the time that the signal takes to travel through a cable, but rather that two different lengths of the same cable will sound different. If the cables connecting one speaker are a different length than the cables connecting the other speaker, the resulting difference in sound between the two speakers will compromise the imaging and coherence of the system. If different lengths of cable are used for the bass and midrange/tweeter inputs of the speakers, the effects will be similar to those experienced when using two different cables as described above. Since short runs of speaker cable sound better than long runs, consider placing your electronics between the speakers rather than off to one side. If for convenience or aesthetic considerations, the electronics must be located a considerable distance from the speakers, it is usually preferable to place the amplifier between the speakers and use long interconnect cables and short speaker wire."
at night after work before bed I don't like anything, movies, speakers, whatever. I go to sleep wake up rested the next morning, maybe coffee and I like everything, movies, speakers, whatever.
I would think that eliminating the high current woofer signal from the wire feeding the tweeter including the voice coil kickback from large inductance woofers would improve the sound at least with lower guage speaker wire.
Indeed, the separation of current paths is a main candidate for there being a possible difference in the resultant sound, as this does deliver greater isolation between the low and high frequency circuits (it can't fully eliminate interaction, bi-amping goes the extra step there). It's less clear though whether any change should necessarily be an improvement in the perceived sound quality. People don't always hear it as such, some have said the speaker sounds less cohesive. A plausible cause is the likelihood that the speaker has been designed from both technical and listening test perspective to be performing its best in the way the majority of owners will use it, that is, not in bi-wire configuration. The most likely candidate I see there is a change in phase behavior in the crossover band between bi-wiring and single wire. Bi-wiring does small but potentially significant rearrangement of some of the possible electrical interaction of reactive components, and this can alter phase. If the crossover is already ideal with single wire configuration, and degrades with bi-wiring, that might outweigh other factors that theoretically should be good. If the crossover behavior is unchanged or tidied up a little, then that would either not affect or add to other potential benefits of bi-wiring like reduced cable and terminal contact resistance losses.
Back in the day when I did car stereo installs for my fiends, I would always tell them once they get a sub, put bass blockers on your mids-highs before you go and replace them. 9 out of 10 would not end up replacing them cause they sounded so much better with just the HPF and they could now keep up with their subs.
Most speakers have pretty high distortion under 100 hz, so putting a high pass active filter on them is a no brainer. With most systems it's 80Hz which is a reasonable number without knowing the specifics of the room.
More two-channel integrated amps and pre-amps should have built-in active crossovers with subwoofer outputs just like home theater receivers. The speakers would sound better. The amplifier would sound better. Everyone wins.
Not quite. How do you know what crossover frequency and what crossover slope would you need to use for each speaker driver? Also, how would you compensate for a baffle-step and for other frequency response irregularities caused by driver's issues, interactions between drivers and baffle edge difraction?
I use a Pioneer VSX-LX303 AV (home theatre) amplifier for modest stereo duty as well as normal film watching as you can use the Atmos high positioned front speaker pair as an additional seperate stereo pair to power the tweets on my front left and right floorstanding biwire capable speakers. Long winded sentence, sorry, but driving the mids and mid bass with the normal front stereo pair and the tweets from the additional copy cat amplified pair of what would normally when in surround mode be the height pair means that when listening in stereo I have two left and two right amplified channels per floor stander... it does improve the sound marginally but in all fairness you are limited by the abilities of the amplifier...it's difficult enough to get the Pioneer to accept "large" front speakers and maintain the subwoofer output channels but possible.
Interesting video Danny. I like how you explain everything. Interesting, Transparent makes very expensive speaker cables and none of them are bi-wire cables. I think Focal and Dynaudio doesn't have the option to bi-wire. Keep up the good work! I use to think it was super cool when speakers had two sets of binding post...lol..
My initial experience of bi-wring was splitting the crossovers in a pair of Rogers LS3/5A speakers -- the improvement in midrange clarity (the first test was the opening track of Cat Stevens' The for the Tillerman) was, to me, phenomenal. Maybe it was the complexity of the crossover that helped with the improvement -- but it was definitely there.
I can relate to your positive experience. On my british 2-ways with 2nd order x-overs I went quickly to biwiring, and went back only briefly as clarity was reduced with single wiring, and a strange dependency of SQ on the jumper cable used was noticed, some jumper cables had terrible emphasis on sibilance. I wouldn’t generalize though to say ALL speakers positively respond to biwiring but i disagree if someone suggest the exact opposite was true.
The very low RF voltage in the speaker circuit is loaded by the very low output impedance of the amplifier, so it is shorted by the very low output impedance of the amplifier and does not affect the much higher impedance of the amplifier negative feedback circuit. RF in the speaker circuit is effectively shorted out by the very low impedance of the amplifier output. The very low RF voltage in the speaker circuit is much lower than the output voltage of the amplifier. Apply basic circuits analysis superposition theorem.
He simply doesn't understand impedance, and load with respect to the output amplifier and speaker impedance. He sales this as if he thinks the low output impedance of the amplifier and the low impedance of the speakers will support RF and EMI. He doesn't seem to understand that inducing voltage into low impedance becomes more difficult as the impedance goes lower.
@@dannyrichie9743 Just more BS marketing from another company that thinks you should over pay for an amp that you could not distinguish from a any other good quality amp. So if you don't believe it is just marketing hype watch the same guy talk about damping factor and the importance of low output impendence in this video were he claims this is the most critical feature. Start it at 2 minutes in. th-cam.com/video/iq_Z4YUsGGo/w-d-xo.html. You know, to control the Back EMF from the woofer he is say is effecting the feedback loop in the other video. But in this video it not problem because of the low output impedance. Go figure. And also, in school it was very simple, any amplifier that did not incorporate negative feedback was simply an oscillator. A straight wire is not going to provide any input into low impedance load unless the wire is miles long. I'm sure your not using mile long wires are you?
I am another EE and I agree, especially the point on picking up RF. Better is having a matching size wire to the power of the amp. Modern amp also has sub out and user can adjust the X-over frequency at the amp or the sub or both. Just let the sub do its job and get better sound
The sub amp only filters the highs from the sub. The inline filter filters the lows from your main speakers. If you subwoofer plate amp has a high pass filter then it is just an electrolytic capacitor added to the signal path of your entire signal. That's bad. That's really bad.
Re: >I agree, especially the point on picking up RF.< Well, it's kind of baloney. If we're talking about RF then those frequencies are not even in the range of human hearing. Second, decent amp can easily put tens of amperes while inducted RF goes in mA or less. How can it be audible?
I recently bought harrison labs in line rca crossovers and biamped my satellites , taking out the crossovers , I have ordered more to double up on each to create a 24 db Octave slope , I was really hesitant to try this but it has worked out great for my old M&K sats I own .
@@Bob-hq5lj the good ol days , my father was friends with Ken back in the 1980s and I was fortunate to have been put to work in the assembly line . I also worked at Stereo hifi center doing home installation on the weekends . If I knew then what life dealt me the last 15 years I would have blown my brains out in there parking lot there in Culver city .
For those of us that have systems that vibrate everything off our tables , we use mega watts to our woofers and sub woofer's , the lower the thd the amp is the more it costs so we can run class a,ab amps to the highs and mids and use a separate less expensive class D for the low stuff , ✌️
Biwiring does make a difference sometimes, despite the “obvious fact” that it couldn’t. It’s very cheap to try using lamp cord. See for yourself. I once had an amp/speaker combo that had a hardness in the treble that disappeared when I biwired, which I confirmed by blind testing. I have no idea why it worked. Since then, I haven’t had another system where it HELPED, but the difference is usually audible.
I'm glad you put "obvious fact" in inverted commas! There are sound technical reasons why bi-wiring could make a difference in certain circumstances, and as you say there's no certainty that any audible difference will subjectively be "better". Bi-wiring has the potential to give the amplifier output impedance (seen as damping factor) slightly better capacity to control undesired interaction between drivers. If your combo had an amp with a modest damping factor and a speaker design that benefited from better damping to tame an interaction between drivers or crossover sections, bi-wiring could offer such a benefit.
@@DescartesRenegade Possibly, but from a technical standpoint we can't discount the other possibility that one or more of the small changes that bi-wiring makes may have been audible with the equipment pairing in question.
The real test isn't whether you bi-wired or not. You are doubling your cable from one to two. That's what you are really comparing. Try this now. Listen to it as is with both cables coming from you amp to the speaker and only being commonly connected at the amp. Then add a little jumper at the speaker so that the cables are now connected together at the amp and at the speaker. Now what do you hear? I think you will note that there is no sonic difference with or without the jumper. Now what do you conclude?
I only use 83 stranded 99 percent gold wire with a silver 10 gage silver center, coated in a sapphire/Diamond composite insulator. Feeding my 1982 vintage Sansui full range plywood box speakers with the metal clip inputs, all powered by a Chinese Bluetooth amp streamed from pandora app on a 2011 iPhone. Freaking amazing sound! I only use wind power energy because it’s green that way.
Hi If you have redundancy in a multi amp av system then the bi amp may be cost free in an ab amplifier the tweeter would run pure class a the mid/bass unit wouldn't see any difference . If I was buying extra power amps it would only be for an active crossover
One situation that biwiring is valid is with Sunfire amps running the 'voltage source' to the bass drivers and the 'current source' to the mids/tweeter.
@@DescartesRenegade In the words of Bob Carver who designed the Sunfire amp: "Now, back to the Sunfire amplifier. There are two sets of output terminals on the back. One is a voltage source output, with a very low impedance (about 0.01 Ohm). The other is a current source output with a higher impedance (1 Ohm) current source output characteristic. The choice of which to use is up to the listener. If you want a solid state kind of sound, use the voltage source output terminals. If you want the vacuum tube sound, use the current source output terminals. Or - and this is the best part - you can bi-wire your speakers. Use the voltage source to the woofer, and wire the current source to the upper range of the system. That way you have the tight slam impact bass that a solid state amplifier can deliver, and you have the glow to the mid-range, the sumptuous sound stage, and soft, delicately detailed highs that current source amplifiers, i.e., vacuum tube amplifiers, typically deliver. This is the best of both worlds."
I am an aged pensioner with the audio range resemblong a fead plant. As such, I have moved on from high end audio equipment to a penchant for good sound with surround sound (9.1) featuring Denon 4311 amplifier and JBL 10 inch speakers and two JBL 12inch subwoofers in a 6m x 4m x4m high ceiling (Walls are 6inch thick, hollow but cement filled) and covered with 2 in foam and carpet. Despite the long winded introduction, I am interested in your method of bi-amping using the bypass filter. My question is, how many of these bypass filters would I need. One for each speaker or two for my front left and right JBL ND310ii (twin 10 inch woofers) and these tend to "boom" somewhat at the volume levels that I indulge on. By the way, there is one chair in the room and all speakers point directly at "me" Very selfish, I know. Also, all my speaker cables are the "dreaded" 12 cable that you specifically mention in this video. This is because your plugs and beautiful cables would be, understandly, of absolutely no benefit to me. In summary, all I am trying to do is reduce the boominess at high levels of volume. Can you or anyone else help me with this. I also noted, as a side issue your recent denigration of the JBL speakers which hurt lol I think the company are prioritising profit with the current products. Regards and thanks so much for all your videos. Tony chilcott (Australia)
That filter is a good idea when using a stereo preamp/amp/sub. If you have a home theater receiver with sub ( even if your using its preouts to a seperate stereo amp for the main channels), setting the crossover frequency in the receiver to 80hz will have the same effect as that filter. Now the amp will never see any frequency below 80hz.
Never believe in the 80hz crap for home cinema my speakers are full range and go down to 40hz i leave it to that after audessy room correction and have notice your are missing so much bass in all the other channels if you set it to 80hz and leave the rest to your subwoofer to deal with. Example at 40hz i got a punch in my chest when a character slammed the beer glass on the table in the movie brave at the start. But at 80hz nothing and same can be said with all movies 80hz in my honest opinion is over rated and a bad idea. Try for your self and feel the difference
@@harpalchauhan428 NO - that is your system and setup. I know for a fact my system has more bass/punch when I filter my mains as high as possible. I settle for 120hz to blend them and I have FAR more bass there then 40hz - even 80hz.
@@harpalchauhan428 cmn is correct. Your sub / seat placement and room acoustics may have a dip in that 40~80Hz range so when the sub plays those frequencies, it's reduced versus when it plays from the mains where you get more power. If you get the Audyssey app for your phone, you can view the response graphs and get a visual of what's going on. You might benefit from moving your sub, or getting a second one to smooth out the frequency response.
Figuring out the crossover was always the reason I never was happy with a sub/sat setup and always went with 3 way tower speakers instead. I always thought you'd lose some sound quality with a high pass filter. Also trying to blend the sub with the sats seemed challenging. Some preamps were intriguing that had built in high pass and low pass filters but in the end I always just let the speaker handle crossing over instead of essentially an external crossover. Maybe your little in line filter would make it easy and it's worth revisiting.
You are right! If we use a low pass filter with a woofer, we absolutely damage a front ridge of a “punch”, and this leads to a jelly sound. The more bands we use with a traditional crossover, the slower bass we get. For me a woofer with a heavy cone works well without a low pass filter. But it’s hard to find a good one which does not pollute to a HF band at the same time. A high pass filter for a tweeter is fine. And the most interesting thing is that measurement will continue to say that everything is fine. Because they use a nice clear swiping tone.
@@sc0or I'm using 3-way full range tower speakers w/15" woofers. They originally had a single pair of binding posts. After having the crossovers rebuilt, I added a second pair of binding posts. One set for the woofer, the other for mid and tweeter. I'm using a single 220 watt amp to drive them. In your opinion, would you add the LPF/HPF, replace the crossovers with LPF/HPF, or just use the existing crossover? I was under the impression that the speaker manufacturer built all necessary filters into the crossover, so I guess I find this discussion a bit confusing. Also, with this single amp, I would be better off using a good jumper wire rather than running an additional speaker wire (Biwire)?
The weave of the speaker wire obviously reduces the RF pickup. Doesn't the additional dielectric (the insulation) between strands of wire also increase the parallel capacitance of the wire and shunt the RF and some of the high frequency music signal to ground? What is the measured capacitance per foot of your speaker wire compared to standard speaker wire?
I don’t think that would come into play at such a nominal distance . Electric current runs at about 90% of the speed of light so our ears will not hear a difference. Weaved speaker wire will be shielded better yes but that’s about it .
Would you recommend the following addition to my low-end high fidelity system. 5.2 system Marantz SR5003 Receiver, 7 separate amplifiers, 90 watts per amp 2 B&W 683 S2 floor standing speakers B&W HTM6 center channel speaker 2 B&W ASW610 subwoofers (split from 1 subwoofer output) 2 Wharfedale Diamond 9.2 bookshelf surround speakers Mostly streaming on a PC, Tidal via an HDMI cable. Alternatively, a turntable. In addition to your awesome diy speaker cables ... add high pass filters to the B&W 683 S2's and to the Wharfedale's? Both at 80 hz? Or the 683's at 60 hz? Excellent video. Very well explained. It would be awesome to use a high speed camera to see the movement of the cone at all frequencies. Rock on!
Proponent of mono blocking x or y axis. I think this is self evident why this works. For this reason bi amping by by wiring works. Bi biwiring only works when you DON'T do what people suggest and match the wires exactly. That's pretty much exactly how you'd rig it to sound identical since you are choosing to make it sound identical.
makes sense to me… utilize a quality passive crossover and connection media and all you need is one channel on a quality amp to drive it. Bi-amping only benefits you when you are relying on an external system like a dsp to deliver crossover and time delay to each individual speaker. Even then this results in an overly complicated system that can be solved with a simple passive design. Ps, most of those cheesy dual binding posts connect to the same single passive crossover input, so you literally gain nothing by bi-wiring. Learned a lot watching your vids, so thank you for that!
If dual binding posts connected to the same internal crossover input, when you bi-amp, the outputs of two amps would be connected together and the amps would be driving each other, resulting in distortion, shutdown or damage to the amplifiers. The separate frequency band inputs have to be completely separate electrically in order to be able to bi-amp the speaker.
Well all I can say is you finally made me decide to switch my front JBL 590 speakers that I play thru my Denon AVR. It's a80 Herz cut off I believe set to small. I assumed the large at 49 inches tall JBL would ususlly be set to large. I don't know if I hear the difference but your explanation made me feel a little bit better that it doesn't hurt. I have two subs in between the speakers that are matching from the line. It already sounded good.🤔🤫😋 The compression horn that cuts off at 1.5k Hertz is the star of the show anyway!😝
Thanks for the advice. No wonder transparent audio cable company don't believe in bi wire speaker cables. I understood the principal, now. I have rel subwoofer, it uses speakers low frequency signal to play low bass only. And it sounds details deep bass when Cello kick in from the notes.
True bi/multi amping involves removing the speaker level crossover from the signal path, and using a separate filtered amplifier channel for each driver. This is how most self powered speakers work.
So a multi amped active 3 way tower speaker I have utilizes normal passive x-overs with an opamp/Pot in front of it. Sort of a sem-active x-over I suppose. When you see dual binding post sets on bookies, its likely for bi-wiring and not bi-amping cuz Dannys right. It be dumb to bi-amp a bookie!
Fantastic review, I am new on this channel and I become a fan! Hi didn’t understand…. Because my amplifier has a sub RCA outlet… Does the amplifier is bypassing the low frequency dedicated to the speakers and redirecting it to the subwoofer? Thanks for helping me to understand.
would adding a subwoofer essentially work the same way in terms of taking the work out of the amplifier for the lows? At a certain point I assume buying a subwoofer is cheaper than buying an extra amp.
I can agree with you. I did biwire my vandersteen model 2 ce as per Richard Vandersteen.. I used 12 gauge ofc and 14 ofc for the upper. Braided them sleeved them used silver banana plugs. They are powered by a Phase Lin 400 amp and a hitachiha610 int amp.. Big difference on bass less muddy more punch and clearer mid and high. Soundstage improved as well. Now I a/b it by just using the 12 gauge pair and jumpers. Then back to biwire.. Big difference. Worth the cost of the extra cable.. I agree with Danny in most cases but I also listen to the designer of these magnificent speakers..ps I will try the jumper when I can with the biwire.
Yeah I swear there is a noticeable difference. Not about to rewire for single wiring to A/B back and forth though. It's true that doubling wires will double your signal noise, but the noise is minimal on my amp.
how about using speaker output a for the highs and use speaker output b for the lows of a receicer or integrated amp having multiple speaker outputs to connect to a bi wire capable speaker
You might laugh, when I first saw a duel post speakers I thought wiring them together might blow a speaker or the amp! Thanks for a vey simple explanation about what's actually going on and especially about how the different speakers naturally draw power and the effect on the output.
I was told by a very experienced speaker designer that there was an actual technical difference when bi-wiring but it is very likely that the speaker designer would have single wired when voicing the speaker anyway, so if biwiring sounded any different it would likely be less as it was supposed to sound.
If I understand correctly your point is that by adding a high pass filter and sending the LFE to the sub, that's equivalent to bi-amping as the sub has its own amplification. A couple of questions: 1. Does an AVR's subwoofer crossover frequency accomplish the same as the high pass filter? I've heard folks refer to the crossover as a filter. 2. Would you not want to also separate the amplification of the HFE and the LFE on the speaker itself as well, essentially tri-amping when you have a 3 way speaker with a sub? Would that not be desirable when a speaker has very low impedance in the LFE region? Also, would it not also separate the long and short sounds from each signal allowing for more clarity and separation as you discussed there? I just want to confirm that bi-amping the speaker itself is a good thing and tri-amping (effectively by adding a subwoofer) is actually the ideal set up.
Most receivers have a feature to roll the bottom off of the main speakers. Some have simple settings for speaker size of large or small, and it is just a way to adjust the range limit. Splitting a small speakers drivers into separate amps gains very little to nothing, but splitting the low end off of it and sending it to a sub gains quite a bit.
@@dannyrichie9743 Thanks for the response! I enjoy your videos a lot and you're keeping speaker manufacturers honest. Recently, I watched a video on the B&W 700 series and guess what? They showed the crossover parts - they literally allowed folks to look at them. I was thinking "that's gotta be because of Danny's videos". They are proactively showing what the speaker is made of including drivers and everything. I actually wonder if they'll change their signature frequency response because of you. If they do, I swear to god, it's your doing😄 As for the topic, I bi-amp my towers and use a sub for lower than 50 hz.
Thank you Danny! because of your video I just tried using all the binding post with the metal connector in between. It gave me both detail and bass. I hear subtle difference between single wire (using bottom binding post) or bi-wiring with multi-strand cable. Single wire gave me good bass / less detail and bi wiring less bass / good detail. I preferred the bi-wiring first because I chose detail Dover bass response. But now I have both! Many thanks! :D
Danny, don't want to sound like I'm correcting or anything, but what about bi-amping a 2-way or 3-way with a low-powered high quality tube amp for the tweeter and a high-powered solid-state amp for the woofers? I think it can be a great way to go, with legitimate benefits both technically and in sound quality. Also, it can be beneficial if the speakers have less than perfect impedance variation, especially if you want to use a triode tube amp. What do you think?
Yeah are you going to go through the pain match gain settings compitently between the 2 amps. sure you can do it but 3 way would be a pain and I'd rather kill my self Iv done it with bw802 and a 180w solid state for the lows and coincident 18w 300b set amp for the mids and the highs... Not enough of a benefit misbehaved at high output levels. If I had a digital crossover and direct wireing maybe but even then.
I see your thinking, I tried it but valve and transistor amplifiers respond differently to input signals and react differently to speaker loads. It was fun but hardly high fidelity. It was significantly worse than either used in the normal way.
@@mikebaltiman4844 Hmm, that’s interesting. Maybe that was some sort of a matching issue? Just saying, because there are amps designed specifically for the application I described, like the MC901 dual mono amp from McIntosh, which has a tube section for mids and highs and a SS section for the woofers.
@@LevonArakelian yes, matching was the problem and it wasn't the volume (I matched the gains), possibly slightly out of phase with each other at least. Those McIntosh's do look nice, designed to work together properly no doubt. Best way to go if you have the $$$!
@@LevonArakelian it's a gimik for ppl who buy mac gear with more fanboy glee then brains if you can hear the difference go ahead but it's asperetional at best. Lots of better solid only or tube only amps. And again Any gains are lost in unessicary complexity. Better to take an existing speaker and rebuild the crossovers then ANY gains from that amp. I hate mac gear as it is for pure lack of price to performance and only for idiots... Well current options anyway.
Great tip! Really help improve the sound of my system. What I did is set my tower speakers to small in my AV receiver, and then adjust the crossover frequency to the front speaker. This really help open up the midrange, so much clearer and coherent....... almost 3D like!
I thought the main reason for buying is using two separate different types of amplifiers for the highs and lows. Like using a solid state amplifier to drive the lows and a tube amplifier to drive the highs.
That would be a valid reason to bi-amp, if someone liked the top end sound of a tube/valve amplifier, and the low frequency benefit of an amp with a high damping factor.
There isn't any engineering that suggests the amperage load on these cables comes close to causing a problem. I've seen smaller cables used on generators. Just feel your cables. Are the hot? No. Then there isn't any problem with the cross sectional area.
@@ProffAndy Hmm. A pair of speakers using about 50w power - generally agreed to be about as much as any home setup would use - would pull around 3A. Roughly the same as a USB charger that works fine with wire as thin as a hair. With moderate speaker cable the resistance would be so low given the low amps it simply has no practical effect.
@@markchisholm2657 Have you ever heard about such thing as a damping factor? Even if your cable impedance would be as low as the amp's output impedance the damping factor at speaker's terminals would be already twice lower than at amp's output terminals.
Great information and explanation. I am getting back into the audio again but more budget friendly (small room helps). I was trying to get my head around how bi-amping speakers when you are sending the same signal to both posts and the crossovers just make heat out of what it doesn't use. If you wanted a very simple system, what do people think about a set up like the following: source with volume (and maybe tone) control ( bluesound Node or similar. A phone or tablet may even work) - into - a sub with an active crossover (like SVS pro-100 or similar) - sub out - into an amp (or two mono) - into your speakers. With this setup, I'd try tubes on the mains. Any way you could test the sensitivity on some speakers full range and then with the 100Hz or so bypass? It should jump quite a bit. Thanks for the great work - only found your channel about a month ago. Lots of catching up to do!
If we put double tube connectors to replace the common connectors in a bi-ampable speaker......then use your speaker cable.....and finally use two identical amps that include variable input/output levels you can improve the sound quality and have adjustability between the low freq drivers and the mid/high drivers by adjusting the amps levels......that's the way I would say bi-amping may be useful...
If you have identical amps you don' t need variable input levels. The amps will be level matched. When separate low and high frequency speaker circuits are driven by one amplifier they are driven by the same voltage. Passive biamplification amplifier voltage gain must be identical to preserve speaker frequency balance. Amplifier current and power output is determined by speaker impedance. Separate low and high frequency speaker circuits have the same impedance, current, and power when driven by one amplifier or separate amplifiers. Passive biamplification divides the low and high frequency speaker impedance, current, and power between two amplifiers. Amplifiers are rated with simple sine waves driving 8 ohm resistors. Amplifier rated power is a simplification. Speaker impedance is complex, not simple resistance. Speaker nominal impedance is a simplification. Music waveforms are complex and dynamic, not simple sine waves. Music has more power at low frequencies than at high frequencies. Passive biamplification amplifier voltage output is full spectrum but amplifier current and power output are always determined by speaker impedance. Passive biamplification with different low and high frequency amplifiers: amplifier output voltage is limited by the amplifier with the lower rated power, so total power is equivalent to the rated power of the amplifier with the lower rated power. Passive biamplification does not increase the amplifier power as a sum of the rated power of the amplifiers, but passive biamplification potentially increases the available current as the sum of the available current of two amplifiers. Passive biamplification does not increase amplifier power driving resistors with sine waves, but may increase the amplifier power driving complex speaker impedance with complex dynamic music waveforms. Example: an amplifier rated output 90W into 8 ohms continuous may only be able to output 150W into 4 ohms continuous. Passive biamplification with identical amplifiers would not change the rated power with sine waves. With a 700Hz crossover music power is divided about 68% low pass and 32% high pass. Passive biamplification may be able to output 180W into 4 ohms with complex music signals, 122W low pass and 58W high pass. Both 122W and 58W are less than 150W into 4 ohms. 180W/150W = 120% = +0.79dB, insignificant in the context of +20dB music peaks and the cost of two amplifiers compared to one. The same amplifier rated 90W into 8 ohms continuous may output 190W dynamic into 4 ohms, so there would be no difference between one amplifier and passive biamplification except the cost of the additional amplifier. Yes, I did use the real specifications of a specific amplifier.
@@paulsebring6930 wow.....thank you for the technical class.....honestly.....Im not at that level of knowledge.....my point is that the variable level capability may give the presence/performance of each group of drivers.....bass and mid/highs....an adjustment that may balance the frequency perception based on level and not equalizing which is the regular way to make adjustments on speakers.....Your explanation is technically true.....At the end the ears are the judges of what you are listening.....its a matter of taste/preference.....Danny is an expert in terms of passive crossover design based on drivers performance......He actually twiks the design to get the most of the speaker.....Im not stating that bi-amping is my preference.....just my appreciation on how it may be useful in the use....if that make any sense....By the way.....I know equalizers also deal with levels but at a freq range......amplification levels deal with full freq spectrum signal.....like a subwoofer output level but without the low-pass cutoff....
i definitely hear a difference on my speakers when i run dedicated channels to my tweeters and woofers. it plays louder and clearer using a yamaha receiver. my speakers are 4 ohms in their configuration when running in parallel i guess, and i don't know if something changes but it feels to me that i switch to a higher quality speaker when i bi-amp them
Hi Danny, I only just discovered these videos of yours from over here in South Australia. They’re superb!!! Thank you for such incredibly informative material. What made my ears *really* stand up is that you described an ever-so-slightly more complete version of an idea that I had a couple of days ago. I run a recapped and tweaked NAD3020A amp into an array of Krix speakers (they’re the little amp that can). They only have one stereo pair of speaker outputs, and no ‘sub out’ BUT the preamp and power amp can be separated via a pair of RCA jumpers in the rear. I want to split that signal into low-pass filtered signal to a powered subwoofer, and let the high pass filtered signal into the power amp. Which of your other videos details the inline filter that you have in this one?
I just got a new set of Magnepan LRS + and I decided to put a 80 hz high pass filter ( harrison lab rca) before the amp and added a powered sub at 80hz . It seems like it opened up the Resolution. Is this what you were saying here? I saw this video afterwards and it seems like it I got it right.
I don't seem to be able to reply to Danny Richie, so I will do it here. I watched the explanation of Hegel Sound Engine at Hegel's web page. Danny's claim is that radio frequencies (RF) in normal speaker wire is fed back through the amplifier negative feed back loop. The weave in his speaker wire prevents RF pickup. Hegel Sound Engine claims to use feed forward rather than negative feedback, so RF in the speaker wire would have no effect on the amplifier that has no negative feedback. Bent Holter also shows that one of the limitations of amplifier negative feedback is high frequencies must be eliminated in the negative feedback loop. RF from the speaker wire would be eliminated in the amplifier negative feedback loop. Add that to my claims that RF in the speaker wire is lower voltage than the audio frequency signal and is shunted from the high impedance negative feedback loop by the low amplifier output impedance (high damping factor).
What about splitting the connections for the diy speaker cable into 2, but for the amp side? Then into one connection at the speaker? My denon can assign 2 channels per front main speaker for bi-amping. So if I connected each cable to 2 output channels my mains would get 210 watts rather than 105
Awesome video, the principles are so clearly laid out, I still don't fully understand application. Do we need 4 filters as in one per channel for each amp? I'm assuming these filters go between pre and power?
If I want to Bi-Amp why couldn't I use my Anthem AVM90 to remove the lows going to what would be a separate channel using the ARC software having the same impact as a physical filter plugged into the speaker? Wouldn't it be the same effect if my preprocessor is to to not send Highs to the Tweeters(One set of cables) Lows to the Subwoofers (another set of cables) on B&W 804 D3's?
Makes me feel really good about myself when I did the research and did this before Danny confirmed it's effectiveness. :) I have a high pass filter at 250hz on my 7wpc tube amp; it just made sense to not feed it the lower frequencies and make the amp work harder than it needed to.
I my experience replacing the metalpiece that conects a pair of binding post with a short piece of speaker cable does bring a slightly audible betterment is some cases. Bi-wiring does not but is doubling the cost. And for IF inteference via unshielded speaker cables: c`mon thats in 99,9% a rather theoretical thing with no practical relevance.
Danny I guys from audio engineering world know your the real deal, we understand you. These hi fi guys read a few books and listen to a system or two and suddenly they are experts.
I was told that biwire was a misunderstanding, the retailers actually said buy wire.
Remember Monster Cables???
Still have some.
Lol genius 😝
I heard that too, but first they told me ‘buy amp’🥴☺️
It's like directional interconnects. They direct more of your money into the seller's pocket.
Thank you for educating the lot, Sire. The topic you covered here of high-passing the mains is the single most significant one to clear the main’s low end, regardless of whether one connects a subwoofer or not.
Technically, unless you have low and high pass filters at the pre-amp (adding more processing to the signal) the cables will have all frequencies going through them anyway. If you bi-amp, with the correct filters, then you can maybe get more benefit, but I have always found it more plecebo effect than real world effect with those smaller speakers. Maybe I am just old, or haven't heard it done quite right :)
Some amps have an LFE out with a built in cross-over, sometimes adjustable (even some two channel amps) . Anyone sending that LFE to a powered sub-woofer is really running "bi amp" as the LFE is being amplified by the sub, and the main speakers amplified by your main amp. Like you mentioned in the video, this is where it really has the best effect. Having a subwoofer and main speakers
Where can I find the inline RCA filter you had in your hand. Also how to you calculate the capacitance needed for the speakers to get the proper rolloff?
HI! I too am looking in the comments where inline RCA filter ? any luck? please pass on the link . Much appreciated!
I heard Kevin Voelks (sp) from Revel speakers. He wrote the white paper on bi-wiring. He said it was his biggest mistake, and regrets it. This video did a good job explaining it.
So what I understand is freeing up your full range drivers on a two way speaker to only reproduce mids will give it a better Fidelity and volume because it will not be moving in the lower ranges but will be functioning in the mid range only so the bass can reproduce lows or in more non-directional Bass? And if so I have a pair of yumi fives made by Kanto a powered main speaker output to the right channel and low level sub output is there a crossover that I can put inline that is low voltage to not use the internal cross over because the main speakers when connected my subs is still producing lower lows then I think they should. And possibly affecting the mid range sound since meds are produced through them also. Thanks
6:55 the main idea of passive bi amping is sound quality, not more power. its to gain sq and control for the upper freq drivers with its own amp. and mitigate feedback between drivers
@@7966016 Since the tweeter is said to not use much power, could I use these 2 amps I have to bi amp just the woofer of my floor standing? It can take 200 watts and I have 2 amps that both give about 50 each. I was going to biamp to get 100 watts into the speaker but I guess that would be wasted on the tweeter. idk
I recently acquired a new pair of Paradigm Founder Series 100F loudspeakers. They're the first pair of speakers I've ever owned that have two sets of binding posts and I was looking at biwire speaker cables for the first time in my audio geek career.
But I don't think so any more.
This is the first rational, well-reasoned explanation I've heard for NOT biwiring.
Cheers from Sydney Australia. Excellent service 👍
I found Bi wiring on my speakers did make a difference, I was surprised, I wasn't expecting it. Did it only to try it . I'm leaving it Bi wired, I like it.
This happened with me too. JBL Studio 590’s running off a Rogue Cronus Magnum. Used some cheap biwiring cables and was shocked at the difference in bass response. I’m usually a doubter and I was really surprised
Hey Danny, how about covering how to make that RCA highpass filter box? I'd love to have one of those for a ported DIY sub I'm working on.
Also, a single video on 1st through 4th order highpass and Linkwitz-Riley, Butterworth, etc and the differences between them.
I have never heard any appreciable difference between any decent to good quality cable. The only night and day upgrade in sound that nobody talks about that I have heard is with bi-amping. The gain in not in the electrical load; the gain is within the division of frequency division. This is why electronic cross overs yield superior results.
On what system are you comparing "good" and "decent" quality cables?
@@thomprd
1) Magnepan 3.7 with 4 REL S510 subs in stereo line arrays and JBL HF compression drivers/ 3,200W triamped, Bryston power/ Parasound preamp.
2) Castle Winchester dual transmission line speakers/ Accuphase E280 (living room system)
3) "Studio" 10.4.4 atmos pro monitoring system. (14) JBL studio monitors (4) REL subs, Anthem AVM90 processor. 21'x15' custom built control room
4) Tannoy System12 DMT dual concentric studio monitors, 1,200W biamped with Crown power
Input sources: Linn LP 12, Revox PR99, Edirol Pro4 digital recorder, Alesis 24 track hard disk, Cambridge CVN2 and Node2 streamers, multiple CD players
What systems do you have to compare "good" and "decent" cables?
@@keithmoriyama5421 If you haven't upgraded the crossovers on those 3.7's then you are really missing out on their actual capabilities.
To bi-amp speakers, you really need to put electronic crossovers in between the preamp and power amp stages. Years ago I had some big Altec Lansings that could be be bi-amped. Altec support gave me the appropriate crossover frequencies and I had a custom dual electronic crossover made especially for the Altecs. The internal crossover was disconnected. The crossover for the woofer rolled-off the high frequencies(not the low ones), and the crossover for the tweeter rolled-off the low frequencies. You definitely don't want low frequencies going to the tweeter. It sounded great. Simply just hooking up two power amps - one to the woofer and one to the tweeter is not true bi-amping and you will hear no real benefit.
I’ve been using LINN systems since 1986 and fully active since 1988. They have dedicated electronic filters for each speaker model and amplifier type, typically a pair of cards fitted into a power amp. My Keltik speakers have eight input sockets on the back because of the dual Isobarik bass drivers (so four channels of amplification per speaker) I’m currently running them with two four channel amps. But have moved up to the klimax EXAKTBOX (with the new ORGANIK DAC) which performs the DAC and crossover functions and has XLR line outs to the power amps for 0:04 treble mid and bass.
You can still bi-amp with a passive crossover on each of the tweeter and woofer. Many speakers have the crossover separated. Use two amplifiers. It's still bi-amping.
@@David_Span That's true but for reasons I no longer remember it was said that it is better to use active electronic crossovers between the preamp and amp stage than passive crossovers after the amp stage.
@@donaldwilson5693 Yes, it could be better, avoiding the losses in inductors in particular -- just saying that it is still bi-amping with passive crossovers, and possibly more accessible for many audiophiles.
@@David_Span I think they also reduce IM distortion more compared to passive ones. Active crossovers will obviously cost more and they must be designed to the speaker manufacture's specifications.
I think this is one of the best videos you've done on a technical topic. Clearly explained, and the example footage illustrated your point perfectly.
...except that Danny says the current increases as the cone excursion increases. The cone excursion doubles as frequency halves (or excursion halves as frequency doubles) without a change in current. Also, part of the reason you can't see the motion of the cone at 80Hz is 80Hz is nearly faster motion than the eye can see and probably faster than the refresh rate of the video.
I did so by installing the free SONEQ VST plugin for Audirvana player. I set Hipass to 50 Hz and I have new Elac 203.2 speakers. Thank you and greetings from Poland.
I did managed to get two identical amplifiers some years back (Ashly FET-1500M) and used them for my stereo setup. It does have the easy to use function to use both amp in the same chassis as either BTL or parallel mode. Tried that for biamping and really didn't felt that much difference, but had a lot of fun running it in BTL mode at full blast for a short while. I thank my neighbors for not noticing the noise (or really good apartment insulation), and since I do not need the BTL power most of the time, I went back to old fashioned bi-amping. I "think" it sounds slightly better at normal listening volume when not in BTL, but haven't spend any time really testing that out.
I did hear much better bass after I tossed the speaker spike and replaced them with sound care spikes, and replacing tin-plated speaker wire with copper ones really improved sound too... I'm not touching any tin plated wires after that...\
Those Ashly Audio amps are a well kept secret. They used to use them in movie theaters. I powered Infinity Kappa 8's with those while everyone else was spending 1000's. I still have mine somewhere ?
More and more streaming systems, particularly one-box things, are doing this in software now for the same reason. You can manually apply a high-pass filter at whatever frequency you like (within reason) to cut the current load for the main speakers and give it to your subwoofer. It just makes sense, but even more so now I've watched this.
Thats what I have done via my Bluesound node, could not believe my ears as the workload to the front left and right was eased by the sub and everything got so much clearer.
Bi-amping or tri-amping using active crossover could do wonders, but, and that is a big BUT, configuring such thing is not for the faint harted and takes a lot of experimentation and trial and error. Then you can get a parametric EQ into that equasion, and you are down the rabbit hole.
What most people do not realise before going into bi/three amping/wiring is that sorting out room acoustics first will have much better results. Just my 2p worth....
If I remove the passive crossover from the speakers and duplicate the passive crossover frequencies with an active crossover, it doesn't change the room acoustics, but it removes the impedance of passive filters between the speakers and the amplifiers that produces dynamic compression distortion. The active crossover isn't sensitive to speaker impedance like the passive crossover is. Conceivably, I could duplicate the crossover frequencies and increase the slopes to 4th order Linkwitz-Riley and get better filter damping (better transient response, lower energy storage, less ringing), better speaker damping by the amplifier, lower dynamic compression, and reduce destructive interference between speakers. The only difficult part is matching the levels, which I should be able to do easily by ear.
That was not my experience, but then I'm using a DSP active crossover. It really is very easy with the mini-DSP system, and I played a bit with the Hypex GUI but I don't yet have their plate amps. I haven't tried the Dayton GUI. But even with camilladsp (no gui - say what you mean in config) it is trivial to make changes and test with REW. Where's the difficulty? After all, to design a passive crossover you have to understand target curves and addition of signals etc and achieving them is going to be harder - and as for aligning phase - its a nightmare. After all, with DSP I can just delay the tweeter to match the mid, then choose a textbook crossover without having to fudge delay with phase, and then if the tonal balance isn't to my liking I can add shelving, notching etc before the XO.
@@paulsebring6930 wouldn`t bi amping(with identical power amps) on passive xovers also have a good effect. the common argument against it is that the amps receive the full signal, but does this really matter? the amp(say for the tweeter) as far as I understand it.. won`t work with any of the signal that is restricted by the passive xovers anyway. so one end up with more control/power to each driver. especially the upper freq drivers who don`t have to compete with the woofer for current.
then you also have the issue with feedback from the drivers that probably affect the sq of each other..with a regular single amp setup. with two amps wouldn`t the feedback/ringing between drivers be mitigated.
ive tried vertical(one integrated power amp per speaker) bi amp myself with what seemed like a good positive effect. not blind tested though
Voice- and look-wise, you're like Alex Jones, Frank Kern, Dave Pensado and Leo Laporte... in one person! 😃 AND, even better: you share extremely interesting info! Thank you Danny! I just found your channel today, and your videos are like crack cocaine! I can't get enough of them! 🤗🙏🔥
I know this video is a couple of years old, but it still should be a must watch for everyone in audio!
Really interesting and informative video! Thanks for the first common sense I’ve encountered on this controversial subject. After much dithering I did bi-wire my Wharfedale floorstanders and I THINK there was a slight improvement but I reckon it’s purely down to doubling the copper area of the cables and so slightly reducing the resistance of the cabling. So there might be a perceptible beneficial effect with my particular Audiolab amp but I think there might just as easily be a slight disbenefit with another setup.
Hifi is so full of snake oil, snobbery and incredible ignorance and I really appreciate your “engineer’s” viewpoint.
A point about biwiring - while the amp is still seeing the same load - the conditions in each wire *are* different. The split of frequencies does mean that each wire has different parts of the signal along it. So the effects of the back EMF from the woofer, for example, does interact with the signal to the tweeter, as well as different inductance and capacitance of the wires possibly being reduced, etc. So, possible differences in the resulting sound is conceivable.
There can be some differences, but much less than just replacing the cable with a higher quality cable.
@@dannyrichie9743 Right - I have some 8 wire braid similar to your cables, and they sound great. The bundle of 4 wires a side on mine are not small, and I can't imagine getting 12 into a tube connector is very easy.
@@NeilBlanchard See how: www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=172291.0
With respect, the load the amplifier sees when connected to a speaker is a combination of the amp connectors, the cable itself and the speaker terminals in addition to any induced electrical interference picked up en route.
By adding a second cable from the same amplifier source you are doubling up the effects that the amplifier sees before it even gets to the speaker which must, therefore, adversely effect the purity of the source signal and hence the sound from the speaker.
Back EMF from the speaker is a reaction to the EMF from the amplifier. Back EMF is opposition to the EMF. The back EMF is the why speaker impedance is higher than the DC resistance. The back EMF does not exceed the EMF and does not affect the parallel high frequency speaker circuit. The impedance of the high pass filter attenuates signals in the low frequency range of the back EMF. However, I don't think there are any bad affects to prevent biwiring. I would probably biwire if I had biamp capable speakers and an amplifier with parallel A B speaker switching. The only bad effect to biwiring would be two lengths of expensive speaker wire rather than one.
Very logical explanations but i tried biwiring on a integrated amp with a and b chanels and the sound was more open on bass, mids and highs, that was may experience.
When you write "tried biwiring" it sounds like you didn't keep your alleged more "open" sound.
I realize this video is 3 years old, but you glossed over the case where you have a pair of main speakers that produce sub-bass. I have B&W N801's and they measure flat down to 20Hz. I worked really hard to find a good amplifier for them (Levinson 333) and I've very often wondered if bi-amping would sound even better. I'm happy with where I'm at now, and probably done making changes to the system. Your recommendation of cutting low frequencies from the main speakers and adding subs isn't a direction I am going to take. For little bookshelves and RCA cable systems.. cool.. it's good advice.
I designed an upgrade for that speaker. Besides balancing out the response and making a huge improvement in parts quality, the lower woofer was powered by a subwoofer plate amp with variable phase, crossover, and gain controls to add a ton of flexibility to create a more balanced in room response.
Where is your info on how to build those High Pass filter boxes for amplifiers?
yes how about offering these for xls encore with correct capasitor values. soon as possible please.
I solved the problem by installing my THREE power amps inside an isolated compartment inside the speakers. Additionally in the compartment is a low power level 3-way crossover, “before, the power amps. My bass wires are about 10” of 8-gauge wire. The mid-range and tweeter are about 12” of 12-ga wire. Every thing is directly soldered. NO screws, lugs, connectors, etc.. High quality RCA cables are used from the Pre-amp directly to the speakers. The speaker end of the RCA cables have the ends removed and are soldered directly to the crossover. THD and IM are remarkably reduced. Should add speakers are individually compartmented and electronically frontally phased. They two speakers were new in 1975. The drivers are all Philips and have remained compliant.
Danny, although I have not tried single wire on my Vandersteen 2 speakers, I did read Vandersteen's explanation on how he came up with bi-wiring his speakers. It did make sense to me. Although you've probably read or heard his explanation, I thought I would include a copy & paste of that at the end of this comment. Hopefully you see this and have time to respond to it as I know you're swamped. I'd like to know your thoughts. On a side note, after I hooked those up and played them, I thought they weren't that great and went to bed. The next night I played them again and there was a tremendous difference. Before I hooked them up, they had been sitting for about 6 months. Given that I don't turn my system off, those speakers had 24 hours to "soak" in electrical system "hiss". I'm a substation technician and we allow big power transformers (such as 200 Megawatt 230 KV) to soak after energizing before attaching load to them after certain circumstances. I'm curious if you have noticed the same thing with speakers that I did? Letting electrical circuits soak gives those systems a chance to warm, electrons (I know this sounds weird) to charge up all the little voids, dips & valleys and give the system a chance fault before going live. Here is a copy and paste from Vandersteen's Q & A section:
"What is bi-wiring and what are the advantages?
Bi-wiring uses two separate sets of speaker cables to connect a single pair of loudspeakers to an amplifier. Coupled with a crossover designed specifically for bi-wiring, it offers many of the advantages of bi-amplifying the speakers with two separate amplifiers without the cost and complexity of two amplifiers.
We began experimenting with bi-wiring back in the early '80s, an era when horizontal bi-amplification was considered the ultimate way to drive quality loudspeakers. (Horizontal bi-amplification used one amplifier to drive the low-frequency section of a speaker and a second amplifier to drive the high-frequency section.) We noted that speakers sounded better when bi-amplified by two amplifiers than when driven by a single amplifier. Surprisingly, this superior performance was evident even when the speakers were bi-amplified by two identical amplifiers at a low volume level and the amplifiers were each driven full-range without an electronic crossover. We initially believed that the double power supplies and other components of two amplifiers were responsible for the improvement, however building amplifiers with twice the power supply and doubling-up on other critical components failed to provide the bi-amplification benefit.
So we looked at the speaker wires. With two amplifiers, bi-amplification used two sets of speaker cables so we experimented with doubling-up the speaker wires and with larger wire. Neither duplicated the bi-amplification improvements. Then we considered that in a bi-amplified system, one set of wires carries the low-frequencies and the other set of wires carries the high-frequencies. We modified a speaker's crossovers to accept two sets of cables and present different load characteristics to each set so that the low-frequencies would be carried by one set of wires and the high-frequencies by the other set of wires. Finally we heard the sonic improvements of bi-amplification with a single amplifier.
Additional experiments with a Hall Effect probe revealed that high-current bass frequencies created a measurable field around the wires that expanded and collapsed with the signal. We believe that this dynamic field modulates the smaller signals, especially the very low level treble frequencies. With the high-current signal (Bass) separated from the low-current signal (Treble) this small signal modulation was eliminated as long as the cables were separated by at least an inch or two. (To keep the treble cable out of the field surrounding the bass cable.)
The crossovers in Vandersteen bi-wirable speakers are engineered with completely separate high-pass and low-pass sections. The bass inputs pass low-frequencies to the woofers, but become more and more resistive at higher frequencies. The treble inputs pass high-frequencies to the midrange and tweeter, but become more and more resistive at low-frequencies. The output from the amplifier always takes the path of least resistance so deep bass frequencies go to the bass input (Low impedance at low-frequencies) rather than to the treble inputs (High impedance at low frequencies). For the same reason, treble frequencies go to the treble input (Low impedance at high-frequencies) rather than to the bass inputs (High impedance at high-frequencies). At the actual crossover frequency, the output from the amplifier would be divided equally between the two inputs as they would both have the same impedance at that frequency. Because of the different reflected impedances of the cables, the crossover between the woofer and midrange actually occurs at the wire ends where they connect to the amplifier.
The benefits of bi-wiring are most obvious in the midrange and treble. The low-current signal to the midrange and tweeter drivers does not have to travel on the same wire as the high-current woofer signal. The field fluctuations and signal regeneration of the high-current low-frequencies are prevented from distorting or masking the low-current high-frequencies. The back EMF (Electro-Mechanical Force) from the large woofer cannot affect the small-signal upper frequencies since they do not share the same wires.
The effects of bi-wiring are not subtle. The improvements are large enough that a bi-wire set of moderately priced cable will usually sound better than a single run of more expensive cable.
All the cables in a bi-wire set must be the same. There is often great temptation to use a wire known for good bass response on the woofer inputs and a different wire known for good treble response on the midrange/tweeter inputs. This will cause the different sonic characteristics of the two wires in the middle frequencies to interfere with the proper blending of the woofer and midrange driver through the crossover point. The consistency of the sound will be severely affected as the different sounding woofer and midrange drivers conflict with each other in the frequency range where our ears are most sensitive to sonic anomalies. The disappointing result is a vague image, a lack of transparency through the midrange and lower treble and a loss of detail and clarity.
Some of the benefits of bi-wiring are from the physical separation of the high-current bass and low-current midrange/tweeter wires. So-called bi-wire cables that combine the wires in one sheath do not offer the full advantages of true bi-wiring although they may be an excellent choice for mono-wiring the speakers.
The cables should all be the same length. This is not due to the time that the signal takes to travel through a cable, but rather that two different lengths of the same cable will sound different. If the cables connecting one speaker are a different length than the cables connecting the other speaker, the resulting difference in sound between the two speakers will compromise the imaging and coherence of the system. If different lengths of cable are used for the bass and midrange/tweeter inputs of the speakers, the effects will be similar to those experienced when using two different cables as described above.
Since short runs of speaker cable sound better than long runs, consider placing your electronics between the speakers rather than off to one side. If for convenience or aesthetic considerations, the electronics must be located a considerable distance from the speakers, it is usually preferable to place the amplifier between the speakers and use long interconnect cables and short speaker wire."
at night after work before bed I don't like anything, movies, speakers, whatever. I go to sleep wake up rested the next morning, maybe coffee and I like everything, movies, speakers, whatever.
I would think that eliminating the high current woofer signal from the wire feeding the tweeter including the voice coil kickback from large inductance woofers would improve the sound at least with lower guage speaker wire.
Indeed, the separation of current paths is a main candidate for there being a possible difference in the resultant sound, as this does deliver greater isolation between the low and high frequency circuits (it can't fully eliminate interaction, bi-amping goes the extra step there). It's less clear though whether any change should necessarily be an improvement in the perceived sound quality. People don't always hear it as such, some have said the speaker sounds less cohesive. A plausible cause is the likelihood that the speaker has been designed from both technical and listening test perspective to be performing its best in the way the majority of owners will use it, that is, not in bi-wire configuration. The most likely candidate I see there is a change in phase behavior in the crossover band between bi-wiring and single wire. Bi-wiring does small but potentially significant rearrangement of some of the possible electrical interaction of reactive components, and this can alter phase. If the crossover is already ideal with single wire configuration, and degrades with bi-wiring, that might outweigh other factors that theoretically should be good. If the crossover behavior is unchanged or tidied up a little, then that would either not affect or add to other potential benefits of bi-wiring like reduced cable and terminal contact resistance losses.
Back in the day when I did car stereo installs for my fiends, I would always tell them once they get a sub, put bass blockers on your mids-highs before you go and replace them. 9 out of 10 would not end up replacing them cause they sounded so much better with just the HPF and they could now keep up with their subs.
High pass filters?
@@AluminumHaste Yes, it was just a cap I would get from the local car stereo store
Most speakers have pretty high distortion under 100 hz, so putting a high pass active filter on them is a no brainer. With most systems it's 80Hz which is a reasonable number without knowing the specifics of the room.
More two-channel integrated amps and pre-amps should have built-in active crossovers with subwoofer outputs just like home theater receivers. The speakers would sound better. The amplifier would sound better. Everyone wins.
Not quite. How do you know what crossover frequency and what crossover slope would you need to use for each speaker driver? Also, how would you compensate for a baffle-step and for other frequency response irregularities caused by driver's issues, interactions between drivers and baffle edge difraction?
@@IliyaOsnovikov not for biamping, but for integrating a sub as is mentioned in the video.
@@nickfowler515 Yes, that makes sense. I should read your post more attentively.
I use a Pioneer VSX-LX303 AV (home theatre) amplifier for modest stereo duty as well as normal film watching as you can use the Atmos high positioned front speaker pair as an additional seperate stereo pair to power the tweets on my front left and right floorstanding biwire capable speakers.
Long winded sentence, sorry, but driving the mids and mid bass with the normal front stereo pair and the tweets from the additional copy cat amplified pair of what would normally when in surround mode be the height pair means that when listening in stereo I have two left and two right amplified channels per floor stander... it does improve the sound marginally but in all fairness you are limited by the abilities of the amplifier...it's difficult enough to get the Pioneer to accept "large" front speakers and maintain the subwoofer output channels but possible.
External active crossovers are available for those with very discerning tastes.
Thank you, Sir. G.R. Research is 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍.
Interesting video Danny. I like how you explain everything. Interesting, Transparent makes very expensive speaker cables and none of them are bi-wire cables. I think Focal and Dynaudio doesn't have the option to bi-wire. Keep up the good work! I use to think it was super cool when speakers had two sets of binding post...lol..
My initial experience of bi-wring was splitting the crossovers in a pair of Rogers LS3/5A speakers -- the improvement in midrange clarity (the first test was the opening track of Cat Stevens' The for the Tillerman) was, to me, phenomenal. Maybe it was the complexity of the crossover that helped with the improvement -- but it was definitely there.
Placebo effect much?
@@DescartesRenegade Not at all.
@The Internetwanderer And if one morning there was a mountain view instead, you wouldn't notice a difference.
Why don't they just design the speakers the right way?
I can relate to your positive experience. On my british 2-ways with 2nd order x-overs I went quickly to biwiring, and went back only briefly as clarity was reduced with single wiring, and a strange dependency of SQ on the jumper cable used was noticed, some jumper cables had terrible emphasis on sibilance. I wouldn’t generalize though to say ALL speakers positively respond to biwiring but i disagree if someone suggest the exact opposite was true.
Nice informative video , thank you . Does bi-wiring cancel out the internal crossover and if not what will it’s function be ?
The very low RF voltage in the speaker circuit is loaded by the very low output impedance of the amplifier, so it is shorted by the very low output impedance of the amplifier and does not affect the much higher impedance of the amplifier negative feedback circuit. RF in the speaker circuit is effectively shorted out by the very low impedance of the amplifier output. The very low RF voltage in the speaker circuit is much lower than the output voltage of the amplifier. Apply basic circuits analysis superposition theorem.
He simply doesn't understand impedance, and load with respect to the output amplifier and speaker impedance. He sales this as if he thinks the low output impedance of the amplifier and the low impedance of the speakers will support RF and EMI. He doesn't seem to understand that inducing voltage into low impedance becomes more difficult as the impedance goes lower.
It still has an effect. See what another amplifier designer has to say about it: th-cam.com/video/ER_lqNFckxY/w-d-xo.html
@@dannyrichie9743 Just more BS marketing from another company that thinks you should over pay for an amp that you could not distinguish from a any other good quality amp. So if you don't believe it is just marketing hype watch the same guy talk about damping factor and the importance of low output impendence in this video were he claims this is the most critical feature. Start it at 2 minutes in. th-cam.com/video/iq_Z4YUsGGo/w-d-xo.html. You know, to control the Back EMF from the woofer he is say is effecting the feedback loop in the other video. But in this video it not problem because of the low output impedance. Go figure. And also, in school it was very simple, any amplifier that did not incorporate negative feedback was simply an oscillator. A straight wire is not going to provide any input into low impedance load unless the wire is miles long. I'm sure your not using mile long wires are you?
Thanks Danny, you are the guy. This one was outstanding even by your standards.. :D
I am another EE and I agree, especially the point on picking up RF. Better is having a matching size wire to the power of the amp. Modern amp also has sub out and user can adjust the X-over frequency at the amp or the sub or both. Just let the sub do its job and get better sound
The sub amp only filters the highs from the sub. The inline filter filters the lows from your main speakers. If you subwoofer plate amp has a high pass filter then it is just an electrolytic capacitor added to the signal path of your entire signal. That's bad. That's really bad.
Re: >I agree, especially the point on picking up RF.<
Well, it's kind of baloney. If we're talking about RF then those frequencies are not even in the range of human hearing. Second, decent amp can easily put tens of amperes while inducted RF goes in mA or less. How can it be audible?
I recently bought harrison labs in line rca crossovers and biamped my satellites , taking out the crossovers , I have ordered more to double up on each to create a 24 db Octave slope , I was really hesitant to try this but it has worked out great for my old M&K sats I own .
I used the M&K adjustable analog passive high pass filter LP-1S on a 2 channel system years ago and loved it
@@Bob-hq5lj the good ol days , my father was friends with Ken back in the 1980s and I was fortunate to have been put to work in the assembly line . I also worked at Stereo hifi center doing home installation on the weekends
. If I knew then what life dealt me the last 15 years I would have blown my brains out in there parking lot there in Culver city .
@@jasontimothywells9895 I'm still using both a M&K MX70 and K9 subwoofer. I hope you find peace my friend
For those of us that have systems that vibrate everything off our tables , we use mega watts to our woofers and sub woofer's , the lower the thd the amp is the more it costs so we can run class a,ab amps to the highs and mids and use a separate less expensive class D for the low stuff , ✌️
Biwiring does make a difference sometimes, despite the “obvious fact” that it couldn’t. It’s very cheap to try using lamp cord. See for yourself. I once had an amp/speaker combo that had a hardness in the treble that disappeared when I biwired, which I confirmed by blind testing. I have no idea why it worked. Since then, I haven’t had another system where it HELPED, but the difference is usually audible.
I'm glad you put "obvious fact" in inverted commas! There are sound technical reasons why bi-wiring could make a difference in certain circumstances, and as you say there's no certainty that any audible difference will subjectively be "better". Bi-wiring has the potential to give the amplifier output impedance (seen as damping factor) slightly better capacity to control undesired interaction between drivers. If your combo had an amp with a modest damping factor and a speaker design that benefited from better damping to tame an interaction between drivers or crossover sections, bi-wiring could offer such a benefit.
Placebo effect much?
@@DescartesRenegade Possibly, but from a technical standpoint we can't discount the other possibility that one or more of the small changes that bi-wiring makes may have been audible with the equipment pairing in question.
@@PlatypusPerspective biwiring is electrically identical to the jumpers. It's placebo.
The real test isn't whether you bi-wired or not. You are doubling your cable from one to two. That's what you are really comparing. Try this now. Listen to it as is with both cables coming from you amp to the speaker and only being commonly connected at the amp. Then add a little jumper at the speaker so that the cables are now connected together at the amp and at the speaker. Now what do you hear? I think you will note that there is no sonic difference with or without the jumper. Now what do you conclude?
I could not find the previous video on the high pass filter. Great video again, thanks.
I only use 83 stranded 99 percent gold wire with a silver 10 gage silver center, coated in a sapphire/Diamond composite insulator. Feeding my 1982 vintage Sansui full range plywood box speakers with the metal clip inputs, all powered by a Chinese Bluetooth amp streamed from pandora app on a 2011 iPhone. Freaking amazing sound! I only use wind power energy because it’s green that way.
Hi
If you have redundancy in a multi amp av system then the bi amp may be cost free in an ab amplifier the tweeter would run pure class a the mid/bass unit wouldn't see any difference . If I was buying extra power amps it would only be for an active crossover
Right on bother, I am a electrical engineer that dabbles in sound systems and even I understand you! Thanks for what you do!!!
Where on earth did you get your degree? You must know he's talking absolute nonsense.
One situation that biwiring is valid is with Sunfire amps running the 'voltage source' to the bass drivers and the 'current source' to the mids/tweeter.
Huh?
@@DescartesRenegade In the words of Bob Carver who designed the Sunfire amp: "Now, back to the Sunfire amplifier. There are two sets of output terminals on the back. One is a voltage source output, with a very low impedance (about 0.01 Ohm). The other is a current source output with a higher impedance (1 Ohm) current source output characteristic. The choice of which to use is up to the listener. If you want a solid state kind of sound, use the voltage source output terminals. If you want the vacuum tube sound, use the current source output terminals. Or - and this is the best part - you can bi-wire your speakers. Use the voltage source to the woofer, and wire the current source to the upper range of the system. That way you have the tight slam impact bass that a solid state amplifier can deliver, and you have the glow to the mid-range, the sumptuous sound stage, and soft, delicately detailed highs that current source amplifiers, i.e., vacuum tube amplifiers, typically deliver. This is the best of both worlds."
I am an aged pensioner with the audio range resemblong a fead plant. As such, I have moved on from high end audio equipment to a penchant for good sound with surround sound (9.1) featuring Denon 4311 amplifier and JBL 10 inch speakers and two JBL 12inch subwoofers in a 6m x 4m x4m high ceiling (Walls are 6inch thick, hollow but cement filled) and covered with 2 in foam and carpet.
Despite the long winded introduction, I am interested in your method of bi-amping using the bypass filter. My question is, how many of these bypass filters would I need. One for each speaker or two for my front left and right JBL ND310ii (twin 10 inch woofers) and these tend to "boom" somewhat at the volume levels that I indulge on. By the way, there is one chair in the room and all speakers point directly at "me" Very selfish, I know. Also, all my speaker cables are the "dreaded" 12 cable that you specifically mention in this video. This is because your plugs and beautiful cables would be, understandly, of absolutely no benefit to me.
In summary, all I am trying to do is reduce the boominess at high levels of volume.
Can you or anyone else help me with this.
I also noted, as a side issue your recent denigration of the JBL speakers which hurt lol I think the company are prioritising profit with the current products.
Regards and thanks so much for all your videos.
Tony chilcott (Australia)
Hey Danny, You made me addicted to these videos and you are responsible for it! lol
Thanks for EXCELLENT infos and videos,
Best explanation I've heard so far.
CHEERS FOR THE KNOWLEDGE..... it means a lot to us, cheers
Fantastic demo of the speaker cone moving at 10 then 20 then 40 then 80 Hertz. Will remember that for a long time and its implications. Thanks
That filter is a good idea when using a stereo preamp/amp/sub. If you have a home theater receiver with sub ( even if your using its preouts to a seperate stereo amp for the main channels), setting the crossover frequency in the receiver to 80hz will have the same effect as that filter. Now the amp will never see any frequency below 80hz.
Never believe in the 80hz crap for home cinema my speakers are full range and go down to 40hz i leave it to that after audessy room correction and have notice your are missing so much bass in all the other channels if you set it to 80hz and leave the rest to your subwoofer to deal with. Example at 40hz i got a punch in my chest when a character slammed the beer glass on the table in the movie brave at the start. But at 80hz nothing and same can be said with all movies 80hz in my honest opinion is over rated and a bad idea. Try for your self and feel the difference
@@harpalchauhan428 NO - that is your system and setup. I know for a fact my system has more bass/punch when I filter my mains as high as possible. I settle for 120hz to blend them and I have FAR more bass there then 40hz - even 80hz.
@@harpalchauhan428 cmn is correct. Your sub / seat placement and room acoustics may have a dip in that 40~80Hz range so when the sub plays those frequencies, it's reduced versus when it plays from the mains where you get more power. If you get the Audyssey app for your phone, you can view the response graphs and get a visual of what's going on. You might benefit from moving your sub, or getting a second one to smooth out the frequency response.
Figuring out the crossover was always the reason I never was happy with a sub/sat setup and always went with 3 way tower speakers instead. I always thought you'd lose some sound quality with a high pass filter. Also trying to blend the sub with the sats seemed challenging. Some preamps were intriguing that had built in high pass and low pass filters but in the end I always just let the speaker handle crossing over instead of essentially an external crossover. Maybe your little in line filter would make it easy and it's worth revisiting.
You are right! If we use a low pass filter with a woofer, we absolutely damage a front ridge of a “punch”, and this leads to a jelly sound. The more bands we use with a traditional crossover, the slower bass we get. For me a woofer with a heavy cone works well without a low pass filter. But it’s hard to find a good one which does not pollute to a HF band at the same time. A high pass filter for a tweeter is fine.
And the most interesting thing is that measurement will continue to say that everything is fine. Because they use a nice clear swiping tone.
@@sc0or I'm using 3-way full range tower speakers w/15" woofers. They originally had a single pair of binding posts. After having the crossovers rebuilt, I added a second pair of binding posts. One set for the woofer, the other for mid and tweeter.
I'm using a single 220 watt amp to drive them.
In your opinion, would you add the LPF/HPF, replace the crossovers with LPF/HPF, or just use the existing crossover?
I was under the impression that the speaker manufacturer built all necessary filters into the crossover, so I guess I find this discussion a bit confusing.
Also, with this single amp, I would be better off using a good jumper wire rather than running an additional speaker wire (Biwire)?
The weave of the speaker wire obviously reduces the RF pickup. Doesn't the additional dielectric (the insulation) between strands of wire also increase the parallel capacitance of the wire and shunt the RF and some of the high frequency music signal to ground? What is the measured capacitance per foot of your speaker wire compared to standard speaker wire?
I don’t think that would come into play at such a nominal distance . Electric current runs at about 90% of the speed of light so our ears will not hear a difference. Weaved speaker wire will be shielded better yes but that’s about it .
Would you recommend the following addition to my low-end high fidelity system.
5.2 system
Marantz SR5003 Receiver, 7 separate amplifiers, 90 watts per amp
2 B&W 683 S2 floor standing speakers
B&W HTM6 center channel speaker
2 B&W ASW610 subwoofers (split from 1 subwoofer output)
2 Wharfedale Diamond 9.2 bookshelf surround speakers
Mostly streaming on a PC, Tidal via an HDMI cable.
Alternatively, a turntable.
In addition to your awesome diy speaker cables ...
add high pass filters to the B&W 683 S2's and to the Wharfedale's?
Both at 80 hz? Or the 683's at 60 hz?
Excellent video. Very well explained.
It would be awesome to use a high speed camera to see the movement of the cone at all frequencies.
Rock on!
Proponent of mono blocking x or y axis. I think this is self evident why this works. For this reason bi amping by by wiring works.
Bi biwiring only works when you DON'T do what people suggest and match the wires exactly. That's pretty much exactly how you'd rig it to sound identical since you are choosing to make it sound identical.
makes sense to me… utilize a quality passive crossover and connection media and all you need is one channel on a quality amp to drive it. Bi-amping only benefits you when you are relying on an external system like a dsp to deliver crossover and time delay to each individual speaker. Even then this results in an overly complicated system that can be solved with a simple passive design. Ps, most of those cheesy dual binding posts connect to the same single passive crossover input, so you literally gain nothing by bi-wiring. Learned a lot watching your vids, so thank you for that!
If dual binding posts connected to the same internal crossover input, when you bi-amp, the outputs of two amps would be connected together and the amps would be driving each other, resulting in distortion, shutdown or damage to the amplifiers. The separate frequency band inputs have to be completely separate electrically in order to be able to bi-amp the speaker.
Well all I can say is you finally made me decide to switch my front JBL 590 speakers that I play thru my Denon AVR. It's a80 Herz cut off I believe set to small. I assumed the large at 49 inches tall JBL would ususlly be set to large. I don't know if I hear the difference but your explanation made me feel a little bit better that it doesn't hurt. I have two subs in between the speakers that are matching from the line. It already sounded good.🤔🤫😋 The compression horn that cuts off at 1.5k Hertz is the star of the show anyway!😝
Thanks for the advice. No wonder transparent audio cable company don't believe in bi wire speaker cables. I understood the principal, now. I have rel subwoofer, it uses speakers low frequency signal to play low bass only. And it sounds details deep bass when Cello kick in from the notes.
True bi/multi amping involves removing the speaker level crossover from the signal path, and using a separate filtered amplifier channel for each driver. This is how most self powered speakers work.
That would generally be regarded as being an 'active' system.
Awesome, I love learning from you. I’m saving my pennies for nx-tremes 👌
I use the other for hookups for an external supper tweeter with separate crossover.
We use our external supper tweeter on a long 'hookup' in the garden for al fresco dining!
Just don't face that super tweeter in the same direction as the main speaker or it will cause holes in the response due to comb filtering.
So a multi amped active 3 way tower speaker I have utilizes normal passive x-overs with an opamp/Pot in front of it. Sort of a sem-active x-over I suppose. When you see dual binding post sets on bookies, its likely for bi-wiring and not bi-amping cuz Dannys right. It be dumb to bi-amp a bookie!
Fantastic review, I am new on this channel and I become a fan!
Hi didn’t understand…. Because my amplifier has a sub RCA outlet… Does the amplifier is bypassing the low frequency dedicated to the speakers and redirecting it to the subwoofer?
Thanks for helping me to understand.
What about specific common bi-wire cables that start off with one connection at the amp and later splitting into two ?
Add a jumper at the speaker end and compare with or without the jumper.
would adding a subwoofer essentially work the same way in terms of taking the work out of the amplifier for the lows? At a certain point I assume buying a subwoofer is cheaper than buying an extra amp.
Yes, depending where you set the crossover on the amplifier.
I can actually hear the difference when biwiring my speakers. Like night and day kinda difference.
I can agree with you. I did biwire my vandersteen model 2 ce as per Richard Vandersteen.. I used 12 gauge ofc and 14 ofc for the upper. Braided them sleeved them used silver banana plugs. They are powered by a Phase Lin 400 amp and a hitachiha610 int amp.. Big difference on bass less muddy more punch and clearer mid and high. Soundstage improved as well. Now I a/b it by just using the 12 gauge pair and jumpers. Then back to biwire.. Big difference. Worth the cost of the extra cable.. I agree with Danny in most cases but I also listen to the designer of these magnificent speakers..ps I will try the jumper when I can with the biwire.
Yeah I swear there is a noticeable difference. Not about to rewire for single wiring to A/B back and forth though. It's true that doubling wires will double your signal noise, but the noise is minimal on my amp.
that was great information and made so much sense, thanks again Danny!
how about using speaker output a for the highs and use speaker output b for the lows of a receicer or integrated amp having multiple speaker outputs to connect to a bi wire capable speaker
You might laugh, when I first saw a duel post speakers I thought wiring them together might blow a speaker or the amp!
Thanks for a vey simple explanation about what's actually going on and especially about how the different speakers naturally draw power and the effect on the output.
Extremely informative and helpful video thanks
I was told by a very experienced speaker designer that there was an actual technical difference when bi-wiring but it is very likely that the speaker designer would have single wired when voicing the speaker anyway, so if biwiring sounded any different it would likely be less as it was supposed to sound.
Some good points, but so much stuff in this industry simply puts many off after a few years.
If I understand correctly your point is that by adding a high pass filter and sending the LFE to the sub, that's equivalent to bi-amping as the sub has its own amplification.
A couple of questions:
1. Does an AVR's subwoofer crossover frequency accomplish the same as the high pass filter? I've heard folks refer to the crossover as a filter.
2. Would you not want to also separate the amplification of the HFE and the LFE on the speaker itself as well, essentially tri-amping when you have a 3 way speaker with a sub? Would that not be desirable when a speaker has very low impedance in the LFE region? Also, would it not also separate the long and short sounds from each signal allowing for more clarity and separation as you discussed there?
I just want to confirm that bi-amping the speaker itself is a good thing and tri-amping (effectively by adding a subwoofer) is actually the ideal set up.
Most receivers have a feature to roll the bottom off of the main speakers. Some have simple settings for speaker size of large or small, and it is just a way to adjust the range limit.
Splitting a small speakers drivers into separate amps gains very little to nothing, but splitting the low end off of it and sending it to a sub gains quite a bit.
@@dannyrichie9743 Thanks for the response! I enjoy your videos a lot and you're keeping speaker manufacturers honest.
Recently, I watched a video on the B&W 700 series and guess what? They showed the crossover parts - they literally allowed folks to look at them. I was thinking "that's gotta be because of Danny's videos". They are proactively showing what the speaker is made of including drivers and everything.
I actually wonder if they'll change their signature frequency response because of you. If they do, I swear to god, it's your doing😄
As for the topic, I bi-amp my towers and use a sub for lower than 50 hz.
Thank you Danny! because of your video I just tried using all the binding post with the metal connector in between. It gave me both detail and bass.
I hear subtle difference between single wire (using bottom binding post) or bi-wiring with multi-strand cable. Single wire gave me good bass / less detail and bi wiring less bass / good detail.
I preferred the bi-wiring first because I chose detail Dover bass response. But now I have both! Many thanks! :D
Try the single wire going to the top binding posts instead. It'll sound much different than bottom posts.
Danny, don't want to sound like I'm correcting or anything, but what about bi-amping a 2-way or 3-way with a low-powered high quality tube amp for the tweeter and a high-powered solid-state amp for the woofers? I think it can be a great way to go, with legitimate benefits both technically and in sound quality. Also, it can be beneficial if the speakers have less than perfect impedance variation, especially if you want to use a triode tube amp. What do you think?
Yeah are you going to go through the pain match gain settings compitently between the 2 amps. sure you can do it but 3 way would be a pain and I'd rather kill my self Iv done it with bw802 and a 180w solid state for the lows and coincident 18w 300b set amp for the mids and the highs... Not enough of a benefit misbehaved at high output levels. If I had a digital crossover and direct wireing maybe but even then.
I see your thinking, I tried it but valve and transistor amplifiers respond differently to input signals and react differently to speaker loads. It was fun but hardly high fidelity. It was significantly worse than either used in the normal way.
@@mikebaltiman4844 Hmm, that’s interesting. Maybe that was some sort of a matching issue? Just saying, because there are amps designed specifically for the application I described, like the MC901 dual mono amp from McIntosh, which has a tube section for mids and highs and a SS section for the woofers.
@@LevonArakelian yes, matching was the problem and it wasn't the volume (I matched the gains), possibly slightly out of phase with each other at least. Those McIntosh's do look nice, designed to work together properly no doubt. Best way to go if you have the $$$!
@@LevonArakelian it's a gimik for ppl who buy mac gear with more fanboy glee then brains if you can hear the difference go ahead but it's asperetional at best. Lots of better solid only or tube only amps. And again Any gains are lost in unessicary complexity. Better to take an existing speaker and rebuild the crossovers then ANY gains from that amp. I hate mac gear as it is for pure lack of price to performance and only for idiots... Well current options anyway.
Great tip! Really help improve the sound of my system.
What I did is set my tower speakers to small in my AV receiver, and then adjust the crossover frequency to the front speaker.
This really help open up the midrange, so much clearer and coherent....... almost 3D like!
do you have a video showing measuring HF and mains inducing distortion on your 8 Ohm speaker cables?
The 40hz seeemed like it would have been the loudest in a room setting.
I thought the main reason for buying is using two separate different types of amplifiers for the highs and lows.
Like using a solid state amplifier to drive the lows and a tube amplifier to drive the highs.
That would be a valid reason to bi-amp, if someone liked the top end sound of a tube/valve amplifier, and the low frequency benefit of an amp with a high damping factor.
D, Basically. Coax your powered subs to your AV Receiver and be HAPPY. Best, D. From STL.
There isn't any engineering that suggests the amperage load on these cables comes close to causing a problem. I've seen smaller cables used on generators. Just feel your cables. Are the hot? No. Then there isn't any problem with the cross sectional area.
Yes, but any miniscule increase in resistance is going to limit current and reduce bass output. Apparently.
@@ProffAndy Hmm. A pair of speakers using about 50w power - generally agreed to be about as much as any home setup would use - would pull around 3A. Roughly the same as a USB charger that works fine with wire as thin as a hair. With moderate speaker cable the resistance would be so low given the low amps it simply has no practical effect.
@@markchisholm2657 Hence the "Apparently". 😉
@@markchisholm2657 Have you ever heard about such thing as a damping factor? Even if your cable impedance would be as low as the amp's output impedance the damping factor at speaker's terminals would be already twice lower than at amp's output terminals.
2 speaker cables, straps left in at the binding posts to halve the effective length.
Great information and explanation. I am getting back into the audio again but more budget friendly (small room helps). I was trying to get my head around how bi-amping speakers when you are sending the same signal to both posts and the crossovers just make heat out of what it doesn't use.
If you wanted a very simple system, what do people think about a set up like the following:
source with volume (and maybe tone) control ( bluesound Node or similar. A phone or tablet may even work) - into - a sub with an active crossover (like SVS pro-100 or similar) - sub out - into an amp (or two mono) - into your speakers. With this setup, I'd try tubes on the mains.
Any way you could test the sensitivity on some speakers full range and then with the 100Hz or so bypass? It should jump quite a bit.
Thanks for the great work - only found your channel about a month ago. Lots of catching up to do!
Could you make that high pass filter active? - would that be better?…can you make it for any speaker (cut off point)?
If we put double tube connectors to replace the common connectors in a bi-ampable speaker......then use your speaker cable.....and finally use two identical amps that include variable input/output levels you can improve the sound quality and have adjustability between the low freq drivers and the mid/high drivers by adjusting the amps levels......that's the way I would say bi-amping may be useful...
If you have identical amps you don' t need variable input levels. The amps will be level matched. When separate low and high frequency speaker circuits are driven by one amplifier they are driven by the same voltage. Passive biamplification amplifier voltage gain must be identical to preserve speaker frequency balance. Amplifier current and power output is determined by speaker impedance. Separate low and high frequency speaker circuits have the same impedance, current, and power when driven by one amplifier or separate amplifiers. Passive biamplification divides the low and high frequency speaker impedance, current, and power between two amplifiers. Amplifiers are rated with simple sine waves driving 8 ohm resistors. Amplifier rated power is a simplification. Speaker impedance is complex, not simple resistance. Speaker nominal impedance is a simplification. Music waveforms are complex and dynamic, not simple sine waves. Music has more power at low frequencies than at high frequencies. Passive biamplification amplifier voltage output is full spectrum but amplifier current and power output are always determined by speaker impedance. Passive biamplification with different low and high frequency amplifiers: amplifier output voltage is limited by the amplifier with the lower rated power, so total power is equivalent to the rated power of the amplifier with the lower rated power. Passive biamplification does not increase the amplifier power as a sum of the rated power of the amplifiers, but passive biamplification potentially increases the available current as the sum of the available current of two amplifiers. Passive biamplification does not increase amplifier power driving resistors with sine waves, but may increase the amplifier power driving complex speaker impedance with complex dynamic music waveforms. Example: an amplifier rated output 90W into 8 ohms continuous may only be able to output 150W into 4 ohms continuous. Passive biamplification with identical amplifiers would not change the rated power with sine waves. With a 700Hz crossover music power is divided about 68% low pass and 32% high pass. Passive biamplification may be able to output 180W into 4 ohms with complex music signals, 122W low pass and 58W high pass. Both 122W and 58W are less than 150W into 4 ohms. 180W/150W = 120% = +0.79dB, insignificant in the context of +20dB music peaks and the cost of two amplifiers compared to one. The same amplifier rated 90W into 8 ohms continuous may output 190W dynamic into 4 ohms, so there would be no difference between one amplifier and passive biamplification except the cost of the additional amplifier. Yes, I did use the real specifications of a specific amplifier.
@@paulsebring6930 wow.....thank you for the technical class.....honestly.....Im not at that level of knowledge.....my point is that the variable level capability may give the presence/performance of each group of drivers.....bass and mid/highs....an adjustment that may balance the frequency perception based on level and not equalizing which is the regular way to make adjustments on speakers.....Your explanation is technically true.....At the end the ears are the judges of what you are listening.....its a matter of taste/preference.....Danny is an expert in terms of passive crossover design based on drivers performance......He actually twiks the design to get the most of the speaker.....Im not stating that bi-amping is my preference.....just my appreciation on how it may be useful in the use....if that make any sense....By the way.....I know equalizers also deal with levels but at a freq range......amplification levels deal with full freq spectrum signal.....like a subwoofer output level but without the low-pass cutoff....
A three way speaker does it all in one box ... the crossover cuts the frequencies into each driver ...
i definitely hear a difference on my speakers when i run dedicated channels to my tweeters and woofers. it plays louder and clearer using a yamaha receiver. my speakers are 4 ohms in their configuration when running in parallel i guess, and i don't know if something changes but it feels to me that i switch to a higher quality speaker when i bi-amp them
Hi Danny, I only just discovered these videos of yours from over here in South Australia. They’re superb!!! Thank you for such incredibly informative material.
What made my ears *really* stand up is that you described an ever-so-slightly more complete version of an idea that I had a couple of days ago.
I run a recapped and tweaked NAD3020A amp into an array of Krix speakers (they’re the little amp that can). They only have one stereo pair of speaker outputs, and no ‘sub out’ BUT the preamp and power amp can be separated via a pair of RCA jumpers in the rear. I want to split that signal into low-pass filtered signal to a powered subwoofer, and let the high pass filtered signal into the power amp.
Which of your other videos details the inline filter that you have in this one?
I just got a new set of Magnepan LRS + and I decided to put a 80 hz high pass filter ( harrison lab rca) before the amp and added a powered sub at 80hz . It seems like it opened up the Resolution. Is this what you were saying here? I saw this video afterwards and it seems like it I got it right.
You got it.
I don't seem to be able to reply to Danny Richie, so I will do it here. I watched the explanation of Hegel Sound Engine at Hegel's web page. Danny's claim is that radio frequencies (RF) in normal speaker wire is fed back through the amplifier negative feed back loop. The weave in his speaker wire prevents RF pickup. Hegel Sound Engine claims to use feed forward rather than negative feedback, so RF in the speaker wire would have no effect on the amplifier that has no negative feedback. Bent Holter also shows that one of the limitations of amplifier negative feedback is high frequencies must be eliminated in the negative feedback loop. RF from the speaker wire would be eliminated in the amplifier negative feedback loop. Add that to my claims that RF in the speaker wire is lower voltage than the audio frequency signal and is shunted from the high impedance negative feedback loop by the low amplifier output impedance (high damping factor).
What about splitting the connections for the diy speaker cable into 2, but for the amp side? Then into one connection at the speaker? My denon can assign 2 channels per front main speaker for bi-amping. So if I connected each cable to 2 output channels my mains would get 210 watts rather than 105
No, the power is still the same as it would be if you used a single channel.
Question: Why not add the hi pass filter (20hz, 30hz, whatever) directly to the crossover?
Awesome video, the principles are so clearly laid out, I still don't fully understand application. Do we need 4 filters as in one per channel for each amp? I'm assuming these filters go between pre and power?
If I want to Bi-Amp why couldn't I use my Anthem AVM90 to remove the lows going to what would be a separate channel using the ARC software having the same impact as a physical filter plugged into the speaker? Wouldn't it be the same effect if my preprocessor is to to not send Highs to the Tweeters(One set of cables) Lows to the Subwoofers (another set of cables) on B&W 804 D3's?
very good video. not always I agree with you but now I 100% agree with you
Makes me feel really good about myself when I did the research and did this before Danny confirmed it's effectiveness. :) I have a high pass filter at 250hz on my 7wpc tube amp; it just made sense to not feed it the lower frequencies and make the amp work harder than it needed to.
Excellent, thanks a lot for this!
I my experience replacing the metalpiece that conects a pair of binding post with a short piece of speaker cable does bring
a slightly audible betterment is some cases. Bi-wiring does not but is doubling the cost. And for IF inteference via unshielded
speaker cables: c`mon thats in 99,9% a rather theoretical thing with no practical relevance.
Danny I guys from audio engineering world know your the real deal, we understand you. These hi fi guys read a few books and listen to a system or two and suddenly they are experts.
reading books makes doctors LOL
Put the amp in the speaker box. "Signal path" problems between amp and speakers disappear!