And later Congress made it worst till 90s came and Gandhi family lost control of country. Even 2004-2014 was one of the worst years country saw. Scams and corruption cases, economy destroyed.
@@ajss3756The statistics say literally the opposite. The scans are undeniable but to say the situation was worsened when it literally developed our economical foundation is just plain lying.
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
If Britain was so rich why did it came to India and took roughly 45 trillion. If we were so poor how did we pump out that kind of money. Take your industrial revolution and shove it up you bum you guys were animal skin wearing nomad savages when we were indulging in philosophy. What culture did you have? Did you have any cultural food? You know why you guys don't have one because you're busy hunting and surviving the winter that's all. The Greeks and Egyptian had a civilization, we had Indus valley civilization. Where is your civilization. And for the numbers Britain wasn't even in the top five in 1700 hundreds. By 1820 it became the third after colonizing India. So open your ass and study the IMF numbers and If you were so rich without India we would like that 45 trillion back. Thank you
@@jeanettewee8805You talk about economy. Let's say that your arguments are right.. what about the millions of people who died due to brutality of British and man made famines? I don't want to hear about colonisation from muslim in British University..
I live in UK,the students there are so proud that their country developed n helped India.They have zero knowledge about the plunder of British in India,be it through books or elders😡 Great thoughts Rick n Korbin,wish everyone thinks about equality as purely as u guys!❤
Have you heard about the radioactive chappathi fed to indian women to study why iron deficiency persists in india? Research and add to the list of atrocities and anger.
I don't usually cry but this video made me cry,my ancestors were tortured so extremely. I am very thankful for my ancestors to keep going despite such extremes, I live such an amazing life today. Thank You to the Souls of my Ancestors!!!
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
@@jeanettewee8805 Yes it is true that Britain was already a wealthy country but that doesn't justify the racism and the intentional destruction of the economics of a population through forcibly restricting trade with all their available international trade partners, demanding exorbitant taxes even during crop failures during bad climate, breaking hands of skilled workers for eliminating competition like a criminal cartel or a mafia, using individuals as slaves, unethically taking away land ownership from natives. Britain may have been wealthier but that will never justify the demonic actions done on India. Any decent person with a workable mind will never justify straight up brutal mass rape.
@@AkshardhamNewDelhi dude they're copy pasting that paragraph under every comment criticising the colonial raj. I get the feeling they're not really here to reason 🙃
@@ghostpokemon111 I guess it must be a fucking bot... The saddest part is they are justifying colonialism to this date and this video explains part by part how they ripped off our wealth and how they created famine...How ironic is it for them to say when we launch rockets to space they tell us to feed the poor who are the reason for poverty in the first place...I hope in the near future they will be answerable to all the bad evil things they did
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
Did you hear about the tariffs, taxes and not competence policies in the video or just ignored them to make your stupid argument? Come to India and ask any person the horror stories of English rule they heard from their grandparents. You won't get the picture by reading a few distorted facts from English written history books.
@@jeanettewee8805 History is being rewritten by indians every day. You can do just copy & paste the same comment when indian IT sectors are killing it. You are free to comment because now britishers are just left capable of doing this.
After looting so much wealth from India and other countries, they are still going through economic crises..that means over the span of 75yrs they have done nothing ......such a shame
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
What's your bloody problem? Why are you copy pasting the same comment everywhere you paid spammer? Don't try to white wash your Brit history, it is so soiled with the blood of many. There is Karma, your country will go to ashes very soon@@jeanettewee8805
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
Correct and more than few people in Britain and America Empire was their divine right. Good luck ever getting them to feel guilt or remorse for that. They love themselves first and foremost. Everyone else comes second if not 9th place.
Indians are taught a lot about world History, from American, French, Industrial, Russian revolutions to similar social and political change in China, Japan, Malaysia and then recent history of cold wars etc all in even High school. Esp recent world history that shaped current modern world and global order.
In ancient days India is more advanced than the other countries in the world ,we have a quality that we don't harm anyone,we treat the people as god's when they visit us but that became as our weakness
Very honest review....thanks for your sincere take. It is said that while the British, French and others took away much of the material wealth fr India, many Germans, particularly philosophers, scholars, scientists took Indian Vedic and other 'Shashtra' knowledge to develop technology, particularly the first rocketry in Europe, before and during the Nazi era. Some prominent names like von Braun and his mentor ( 'guru') Herman Oberth. There is a school of thought that they had learnt the basics of astronautic ideas and tech fr the ancient Hindu texts. Later after WWII von Braun and his team ( estimated to be 3000) of German scientists, technicians were taken in by the American military and intelligence in an ops called 'Paperclip' in US. These ppl were the same who created the base for what later became NASA...there are yt vids on this subject fr channels like 'History'....would be good if you could review...best n cheers
What is India/Bharat? It's certainly difficult. more than 1000 years of widespread destruction, millions were killed, millions of women were raped, and millions were converted. Thousands of years-old temples and universities were destroyed (such as Nalanda University and others) plus Almost 200 years of foreign occupation led to complete financial ruin and the loss of the most precious Indian Artifacts. The country was divided into many parts, leaving it in a situation where standing is impossible. How brutal our history has been, and how unimaginable the situation our ancestors faced was. They preserved our oldest culture and protected our motherland for over 1200 years. Now, we are witnessing the bright future that was once beyond imagination
Interestingly, when the British arrived in India, the concept of beggars as we understand it today did not exist. Here's a fascinating fact: In India, begging had a different connotation. There were individuals known as "Sadhus" who dedicated their lives to learning the ways of life and spirituality. These people spent their entire lives in meditation and had no means of earning a livelihood. During that time, they were referred to as beggars not because they sought alms for themselves but because people recognized their spiritual contributions and provided support to them. Today, however, the concept of begging in world has evolved into something quite different.
I have a book which is a biography of a poet,writer in odia and he mentioned the massive death of people in that time and he also mentioned the cost of the food and that is very sad that common people can't afford it 😢
India is the only country in the world that has not initiated any war or invaded any country… we have taught Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam .. means The world is one family… and we still believe that
What's good to see is that the technology is spreading truth, and irrespective of ethnicity, color (so called) people (good people) are accepting and realizing the sad truths and facts !
The main problem with the British, and why many still blame them is because (1) they never owned the land. They just saw India as a cash cow (2) all the taxes that were paid by indians went to improve their army and their nation. One od the reason India still continues to have all the buildings and railways built during the British era is because it was built by our tax money. When the muslim invations happenned, they might have destroyed many temples and infiltrated their culture, but they owned India. They spent all the taxes within India. So despite them taking over, India still prospered. Just imagine if British just did their trade instead of completely devastating its people, every technological improvement that happenned over the past 200 yrs would have included Indians. All the world wars that Britain participated had Indians, all british colonies even now contains Indians. British should actually be thankful and greatful to Indians that all their infrastruture, roads and schools were actually funded by Indian tax money. When you are not only looted of wealth, history, pride for 200 yrs, building that back up is an insane task. It might take 50 more yrs to come out of poverty. Even today many Indian cheapos still thrive for White approval.
Whats sad is that modern day british people are completely unaware of all the atrocities they have committed in india and are even taught in history classes that the british "modernized" india and helped us improve economically and socially. Im sure modern day brits are understanding enough to take some shame or atleast admit the gore their ancestors have committed but its the fact they refuse to teach their citizens any of their ugly colonial history and only teach glorified side of their colonialism boasting of "modernizing" their colonies. The deliberate erasure of so many main historical massacres and man made famines from their textbooks, seems so cunning, after all even to this day still true to their nature, huh.
Great question Rick! Think about it for a second. America has taken the baton from Britain. Perhaps in the new millennia history will be read along with timelines of economic growth by each country and its administration
After this video I saw my house, the society, the area we live in, it's all so lavish... its all because of the Our ancestors made unmatchable efforts.
Just like you realising how bad was Columbus! We Indians have our own fair share of realisation about our misleaded and dictated history that no books teaches you. 😄 We still celebrate some of the so called Great leaders as Great leaders 🙏
There was a British politician talk about British culture being eroded and taken over by overseas culture, esp Muslim !!! Well...what comes around goes around. You, the Brits created Pakistan/partition, and now you suffer at their hands - Karma.
Even after so many decades everybody wants a piece of India. Even these two. That's how powerful India is. You can change the history but can't deny the facts.
World is one family and Bharat is like the eldest brother who no matter what is available every single time to help his brothers even if they respect or not, support or not still never leaves the family and family members alone during the baddest time. 😊 I'm Proud of Bharat 🚩
True.. because there were bad people on the Indian side as well is one of the reasons that colourism still exists in India and most dark skinned Indians still have lesser opportunities than their light skinned counterparts. There were most definitely bad greedy people on both sides
Even here in India we are not taught many many things about our past, let alone UK or US. And the worst part is not even the economical destruction, in fact it is the most superficial layer, the White European Christian Coloniser's real success was the mental, spiritual, cultural, institutional & moral subversion, the civilisational plunder & destruction, because that took from us the fundamental ability, the spine to fight back, to rebuild, to grow, teach & learn about our greatness, history, strengths, antiquity, the reality & everything to everything, and that colonially defeated psyche is present even today. It's not the economic sector where we are struggling but the civilisational sector.
Hi guys! I have a movie suggestion that you might want to review. It’s called “Hidden Figures”. It’s based on a true story about 3 black women who worked at NASA in the 1960s.
When I goto a restaurant in UK and served by a white British waiter, I leave no tip and put a note saying I will be donating their tip to an Indian charity in their honor.
I often vist Britain.... And when i see it's beautiful cities... I always say it loud.... Wow what a city made out of INDIAN money i like this comment ...
Even if India was a manufacturing powerhouse, it doesn't make the fact that the Industrial Revolution started in Britain false. The Industrial Revolution refers to mass production in factories of goods. Indian manufacturing was more like individuals doing their own thing. It also refers to Europe specifically.
We were ravaged, looted and tortured for thousand of years yet today we stand as one of the major forces in the international arena.We have the most brilliant and spiritual minds who will retain the lost glory.We are the oldest surviving civilization and our SANATAN DHARMA will stay till eternity.JAI HIND VANDE MATARAM.
The dismantling systems actually killed several unique arts, technology, education ...and several things we don't even know. That is the saddest part. That's the reason I hate britsh raj. take our money we will earn some how again. they destroyed our society. Every system that helped people, these arts were developed over thousands of years. and now we will never every regain that. It lost gone. The hard work of our ansestory to develop these technology is gone. Culture takes several thousands of years to develop. Currently we are still struggling with a huge farming population. We are still here, after everything we maintained our culture, maintained our values. We will be here.
took 200 years to loot India while reducing its GDP from 26% to less than 2% besides reducing the population to 90% illiteracy and starvation. Those Indians who helped them perpetuated the same governance with vicious divisive politics based on birth that ensured easy manipulation and exploitation. Huge chunks of wealth was siphoned abroad. That colonial residue persists amongst dynasties littering the landscape and form the main opposition to Bharat and Sanatan Dharma. Both of these predates ANY concept in human history.
The Islamic kingdoms did drain India to send back to The Ottomans and Central Asia as they considered the caliph as their head of state. It’s just that they were consumed with raw hate and were not particularly ingenious.They were more occupied by internal politics like in the slavery driven sultanates where future rulers were slaves who killed their masters.Thats 400 years of Islamic rule. And the Mughals were just spoiled. Most Indian wealth was in the private coffers of the royals,rampant corruption and sons killing fathers to get to the throne.Islamic rule was riddled by violence of religious hate and violence of throne grabbing .This occupied most of their time. This impoverished people but kept the money in India.That is why the Nizam and Mughals were both courted and looted by the British.Stupidity had set in. This actually primed the country to become easy pray for the British because the people who could have defended it were impoverished and the Mughals had no interest in it till the British started targeting them. And by then it was too late.
Imagine looting India and other countries from around the world, and then calling them poor and third world countries and calling yourself developed. What mindset is that ?
Approx 10 million people were directly or indirectly killed by British. Columbus was in search of india but reached America and called the natives Indians as he thought he reached india...even in 1757 there was bengal famine created by British wherein lakhs of people died...India was a super power for 2200 years in last 2500 years...having highest gdp from any where between 25% to 40 %.Maths, geometry, algebra , science has its base in india
Under British rule the average Indian was at least as well off as under there original rulers, with far more rights under law, 400million people in the empire 125 thousand British soldiers to police the whole empire, fight her wars and protect Britain against invasion,, how could that be possible without the cooperation of the vast majority?
made me cry the torture my people have been under for last millenium, wish there was a time machine so it all could have been undone :( the worst thing about all this is they wouldn't even acknowledge the horrors their ancestors did, they'd rather mock and stick to their racist insecurities
I just shed tears listening to this video , even thou i have read the entire history multiple times. Also, mughal invasion wasnt as gud as what it has been showed in this video. Same Will Durant (american historian) says the following ""The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within." The one civilization that can even claim any victimhood is indian civilization. However, we still work hard march along with the utmost humility and passion. Vasudheiva Kutumbakam is wat our civilization thought us. At least now, i hope those colonized indian minds which are reading this comment should shed their colonial biases and the brainwashed self loathe that has been created on our civilization and its people and come together as indians for our own betterment.
mughal did great things for india.... they abolish fight against caste discrimination.... if they didn't invaded, still poor people and their upcoming generation will be slave for brahmins and zamins.... We love mughals❤❤❤ these indian sanghis won't understand this.... they can't accept the defeat.. 😂 mughals made india great❤❤❤
Cartel dear slve paxtani convert troll. Mughal did nothing but loot and destroy temples and built over it. And no it didn't defeat anyone as it was many times defeated by maratha and others. Nor it conquered whole india. It conquered ur region paxtan and converted ur fore fathers in heera mandi. Also Mughals never abolished any imaginary caste system. On contrary Mughals brought backward - woman in tent, submissive woman controlled by man, all non muslims kafir, shia kafir, pay tax to visit temple, harem mujhra kidnapping woman culture. Secondly, Caste was portuguese word, no such thing or word in Indian religion. Infact Hindus had varna system which means occupation/job and anyone cud become what they want, when they learned skill for it. So don't enforce portuguese thrash on us. Zamindar is Mughal islamic word and culture not indian. And it's still followed in paxtan, not india. India abolished feudal system. Secondly Brahmins never ruled India, no king in India was Brahmin. Brahmins are priests in temple. U andh namazi j,hadis are joke🤣
@@DevilSatan27and u r saying this because u r a Muslim and Mughals were selfish and whatever they did for their selfishness reasons only and nothing else .
@@DevilSatan27 Whoa Delusional much? No invasion can benefit the conquered nation. The whole idea of war is to loot the other party. Any and every invasion is debilitating ---period.
😢 really great video made me cry few times..just imagine India's power if British rulers never existed in India ❤❤ India will top 🔝 the chart 📉 one day surely ❤
What we(indians) did to British to show this extreme cruelty. We never curse anyone...but this intending to do.....We bring back our values one day definitely and lead this whole world "Very Fairly and respectfully", till then we develop our brains long lasting sharper than ever......
You know not only Bengal but also Bihar was destroyed by the tobacco and Indigo policies of British. Whole Bihar went into alcoholic and used tobacco on daily basis and effects are still can be seen. Many areas in Bihar were industrialized like Munger, Champaran, Patna but all collapsed and till date people become dependent on other states for employment. Madhubani painting and art were destroyed, religion and tourist sites were abandoned and didn't rebuild in same magnificent way again. like Nalanda, Bodh Gaya..
IT’S NOT TALKED Because We Indians Don’t Care. Let us make our Future…. We don’t wanna stuck in Past. Kill us if you need to. But Don’t burn our Scriptures and Books and knowledge System. I wish British never destroyed Gurukul teaching System. I wish Nalanda University were never burned.
But since Brits mock our poverty and space program they need to know poverty to india is gift from uk. They made richest nation india poor, to make uk rich. Still encash and use Indian jewels and gold throne etc for uk monarch and British museum and charge us to see our own nation artifscts. We need to learn and never frgt so we don't make same mistake of befriending them and trusting them again
What is more painful is that even most Indians aren't taught it in entirety, people don'tget taught much about the industrial and merchantile past of India
I actually know privileged Indian women (South Delhi, South Bombay) who think that the British were the best thing that happened to India. Also there are a few South Indians (who have spent most their lives in the South) who actually say that they would prefer British Rule over the current Indian govt. The amount of ignorance and stupidity....I mean it's no shock it took us so long to reclaim our Independence, cause we still have so many traitors!
Rick and Korbin should also know that the atrocities and mischievousness of the British and the while race never ended with India's independence in 1947 after some 200 years of colonialism. Before being booted out of India they did the inevitable that an evil mind can only do. Knowing fully well the determination, morale and capability of the Indian people to bounce back from abject poverty and deprivation, they cunningly divided this rich land into two nations so that India can never ever rise again. This was done most strategically on economic and religious lines. Take the case of two of the most prosperous states of Punjab and Bengal. They were partitioned in such a manner that the industrial regions were bifurcated from the fertile hinterland that produced the food and cash crops that were required for the factories. Again, by the Britishers' policy of divide and rule, enmity was created between the two newly formed nations. Thus being on perpetual wars will drain the precious resources and hamper economic growth and development.
I just hate it when Indians beg westerners to feel sorry for Indians.... We were colonised because we were weak militarily ...lesson learned never take your security lightly...... LEARN AND MOVE ON No one can change the past we can only work for the better future
Listen you fool,they ruled us without war..they divided our society and the idea of colonisation still in the mind of a good majority,not just in Britishers but in leftist indians..
Lesser u know about history then try to learn about it, we were never weak and our military were very powerful then and we r not begging for apologization from them. y we should?? i mean, they did the bad things not us. they r shameless enough to not to say at least a sorry, as an bharatiye 1 sorry or millions sorry from them ( British) would never ever affect me at all in any way as a bhartiye and as a human. because it was not a mistake it was a SIN which was PLANNED AND DONE..yeah but we made 1 mistake that we believe them and made friendship with them until and unless we came to know of their devil minds for Bharat.
No one is begging west to feel sorry for us. U are isi paxtani troll who self hates urself is not our problem. Even china, japan, America , middle east, Indonesia, africa was colonised.. and it's not just military that's the reason..we had strong military. It's the devide and rule policy..pitting one against another and then making each fight is how they entered middle East, india, africa etc. And yes we have moved on..and now fifth largest economy..doesn't mean we will forget. Lessons of past is needed to be remembered so it doesn't happen in future
The Jews history is taught everywhere and germans feel sorry for that, but the britishers know nothing about the crimes they commited and they are proud that they developed india from poor peasants.
The fundamental thing to understand is we lost militarily. Once they won, they just squeezed us ( of course, we would not have done the same if we had won, that's different). However, its important to understand that we have be militarily really strong to defend ourself.
Loved your reaction on this video and would love to see both of you reactions on the video below on the British Indentured Labour History and the Indian Diaspora. As an Indo-Fijian, it's surprising to me how many people, especially Indians, don't know this side of Indian and British history. I hope you both could react to it, as I'd love to know your thoughts on it. Video Link: th-cam.com/video/MgWU_EUcWlc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=bxvdZqymEk5ilzql
I am stunned by this video. Even after growing up in India, I had no idea how insanely brutal the colonial period was. No wonder, Indians still love and go gaga about all things British because the truth is not taught. Love your suggestion guys of using a movie to uncover this hidden atrocity
So because some of our ancestors were evil human beings, anything british should be shunned? The majority of brits, were not alive when this took place. If I was listening to some music or reading a book then found out that the guy who wrote this had grandparents that used to be Nazi's, I wouldn't blame him for it and stop listening or reading?
The white man of UK has got the guts/temerity to produce movies like " The Slumdog millionaire " and insulting Indians but has no balls to make a movie on this issue . Is he also suffering from selective amnesia and guilty of his acts Never mind he shall be paid in same coin with interest. The stolen Goods doesn't carry good title
"The East India Company didn't cause a decline in the economy of India, the reverse is true. . .[ and it ] could never have survived without the collaboration and partnership of thousands of Indian merchants, agents, artisans, bankers, and transporters. The Company was the biggest business firm in the world of its time, and therefore, made many Indians fabulously rich. Some of the most famous entrepreneurs and business families of nineteenth-century India made their money trading with the Company or with European merchants. Palatial homes in the north of Calcutta attest to that wealth. These profits were much larger in scale than the profits the Company sent back to England". Quotation from: The East India Company. The World’s Most Powerful Corporation. Tirthankar Roy, 2012 Penguin Books. Tirthankar Roy, Professor of Economic History, born and educated in India.
+ The British created the system of indentured labour to offset the labour shortage created by the so called stopping of the African slave trade. They don't say that they repackaged the slave trade wirh Indians & renamed it as indentured labour. They also used the impoverishment they caused to push their religion at us and we suffer from this colonisation to this day. Remember the point raised by the video about confiscation of lands from peasants who couldn't pay taxes; that land went to the church when the British left India, making the church the second largest land holder in India after the Indian army . Many , even Indians, don't talk about this. The 2 major religions of the world hold a a lot of land & power in India over the Hindu masses., And it is a mockery of intelligence to call them minorities in India. What Indians today suffer from is this tyranny by the erstwhile colonial, oppressive religious minorities who work to this day to break / destroy India further.
It’s our fault. Till date after 75 years of independence we have not been able to show these so called parasitic minorities their place and reclaim our country back. Only hope is Yogi Adityanath that’s it
Any anti British movie made by Indians would never be taken seriously. The movie has to be an Indian - Foreign collaboration, just like Gandhi 1982. Really hope Steven Spielberg takes this up, especially after Temple of Doom :D
And now the looted money in Britain are over and pay back time, karma is getting back to them. It's the fact and not assumptions. It's not taught because no father comes back home telling his kids that he has just robbed a bank and bought luxury back home.
Golden bird india will be back soon😏we still have gold in india,,, recently we found white gold and we found lot of earth rare materials,,still we have everything,,India will be golden bird again😎no one can stop Indian's 😏
LITTLE BIT MISINFORMATION, FROM 1707 TO 1820 THERE WAS A MARATHA EMPIRE RULLING INDIA, THESE HISTORIANS ALWAYS IGNORE MARATHA AND GLORIFY MUGHALS. BRITISHERS DEFEATED MARATHAS NOT MUGHALS. THERE WERE THREE ANGLO MARATHA WARS BETWEEN 1790 TO 1820. FIRST WON BY MARATHA BUT 2ND N 3RD WON BY BRITISHERS. AND THEN BRITISHERS TOOK OVER INDIA. TRUE HISTORY.
The problem of every Indian is we are intelligent, our knowledge is vast...yet we are pacifist by nature, peace loving. That's why country and civilization that younger and smaller than us able to conquer us. Imagine what happen if every Indian develop that aggressive mindset like the Mongols? Conquer and expand? What will happen to the world?
Yes and I also hate that indians try to speak as perfect British English as possible and I think that the Indian style of speaking is dumb or whatever. We should embrace our style of English and make our own Indian English like American English.
Indians do deserve this for not standing with each other and because of the traitors the country was looted, crushed, divided, robbed. I am an Indian and not happy to say this.
India did not miss the bus of industrial revolution, it is because britishers threw us under its wheels. - Shashi Tharoor
And I would like to add to that metaphor, broke India and turned her into coal to throw into the engines of its momentum.
And later Congress made it worst till 90s came and Gandhi family lost control of country. Even 2004-2014 was one of the worst years country saw. Scams and corruption cases, economy destroyed.
Britain literally deindustrialised itself you simpleton
@@ajss3756The statistics say literally the opposite. The scans are undeniable but to say the situation was worsened when it literally developed our economical foundation is just plain lying.
@@ajss3756 I wouldn't say the Congress made it worse. They didn't make it better either, but definitely not worse than British rule.
And some people argued about RRR being too harsh to British people, implying that the British characters weren't that nuanced.
💯💯💯💯
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
If Britain was so rich why did it came to India and took roughly 45 trillion. If we were so poor how did we pump out that kind of money. Take your industrial revolution and shove it up you bum you guys were animal skin wearing nomad savages when we were indulging in philosophy. What culture did you have? Did you have any cultural food? You know why you guys don't have one because you're busy hunting and surviving the winter that's all. The Greeks and Egyptian had a civilization, we had Indus valley civilization. Where is your civilization. And for the numbers Britain wasn't even in the top five in 1700 hundreds. By 1820 it became the third after colonizing India. So open your ass and study the IMF numbers and If you were so rich without India we would like that 45 trillion back. Thank you
@@jeanettewee8805You talk about economy. Let's say that your arguments are right.. what about the millions of people who died due to brutality of British and man made famines? I don't want to hear about colonisation from muslim in British University..
@@saikirankalva8765 Yeah, I don't deny British brutalities towards Indians.
I live in UK,the students there are so proud that their country developed n helped India.They have zero knowledge about the plunder of British in India,be it through books or elders😡
Great thoughts Rick n Korbin,wish everyone thinks about equality as purely as u guys!❤
Uk is the one who destroyed india and gifted poverty to develop pirate uk. But they think otherwise coz obviously they have to justify their loot
I'm really proud of you dear that being in the uk ur heart is still bhartiye and u love bharat, that's great, 👍
@@Ranjganaright, he needs appreciation 👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏
It’s awful just yesterday I saw some of the British saying that they did not caused the jallinwalla bagh massacre, they cannot accept guilt.
Show 'em this vid
And we Indians are still taught that the world is one family. I wonder why!
Why don't you enlighten those teachers with the facts?
watching too many fast and furious movies
makes you think that also
cz be the change you wish to see in the world
its is interpreted in wrong way .... watch nityanada misra or sanjay dixit on vasdudhaiv kutubhkum real meaning
Vasudeva kutumabhakam
My blood boils everytime i watch a video or read about British attrocities.
You are not alone. Its the same sentiment here. For example, the Jallianwala Bagh incident is enough to piss me off any day.
We all r on the same boat
Bro if im President Kim,,i Will destroy the Europe countries,,who looted our Golden Bird 🤬
Have you heard about the radioactive chappathi fed to indian women to study why iron deficiency persists in india? Research and add to the list of atrocities and anger.
@@ravicraoifycheck radioactive chappathi in wion.
Moral of the story: Thats how Brits became Richest and prosperous after looting our golden India 🇮🇳..
😂😂
@@TheNorwayMachan007it’s true, what’s funny about historical atrocities?
Flowerfluer ignore Norwaymachan he is paxtani isi cyber army troll with ass ache
@@HeartBeat-fy6fg are you cyber troll of modi or double agent of pakis😆😁
@@flowerfleur8105 Goldn India of untouchables or brahmins
I don't usually cry but this video made me cry,my ancestors were tortured so extremely. I am very thankful for my ancestors to keep going despite such extremes, I live such an amazing life today. Thank You to the Souls of my Ancestors!!!
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
@@jeanettewee8805 Yes it is true that Britain was already a wealthy country but that doesn't justify the racism and the intentional destruction of the economics of a population through forcibly restricting trade with all their available international trade partners, demanding exorbitant taxes even during crop failures during bad climate, breaking hands of skilled workers for eliminating competition like a criminal cartel or a mafia, using individuals as slaves, unethically taking away land ownership from natives. Britain may have been wealthier but that will never justify the demonic actions done on India. Any decent person with a workable mind will never justify straight up brutal mass rape.
@@AkshardhamNewDelhi dude they're copy pasting that paragraph under every comment criticising the colonial raj. I get the feeling they're not really here to reason 🙃
@@ghostpokemon111 I guess it must be a fucking bot... The saddest part is they are justifying colonialism to this date and this video explains part by part how they ripped off our wealth and how they created famine...How ironic is it for them to say when we launch rockets to space they tell us to feed the poor who are the reason for poverty in the first place...I hope in the near future they will be answerable to all the bad evil things they did
"Tin Gunah Lagaan dega"
Now you can feel how emotional that dialogue was for Indians.
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
Did you hear about the tariffs, taxes and not competence policies in the video or just ignored them to make your stupid argument?
Come to India and ask any person the horror stories of English rule they heard from their grandparents.
You won't get the picture by reading a few distorted facts from English written history books.
THE GEAT BENGAL FAMINE BY WINSTINE CHARCHIL
Karma will do justice
@@jeanettewee8805 History is being rewritten by indians every day.
You can do just copy & paste the same comment when indian IT sectors are killing it.
You are free to comment because now britishers are just left capable of doing this.
After looting so much wealth from India and other countries, they are still going through economic crises..that means over the span of 75yrs they have done nothing ......such a shame
Right.... Britains Economy is shrinking
Ya they are shameless bastards
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
What's your bloody problem? Why are you copy pasting the same comment everywhere you paid spammer? Don't try to white wash your Brit history, it is so soiled with the blood of many. There is Karma, your country will go to ashes very soon@@jeanettewee8805
@@jeanettewee8805cope
It's not taught in USA because current America is ruled by the decendants of British. They carry the same history.
At last some one asked the same question I have been asking.thanks dude..awesome..
In 1750, India had 23% of the world's GDP because it had 25% of the world's population. However, Britain was already a wealthy country even before it colonized India. If we look at the per-capita income of India and Britain in the 1750s, Britain's per-capita income was three times that of India as per Maddison's data, and India's per-capita income had been declining for a century before Britain won the Battle of Plassey. Comparing the total GDP of India and Britain in the 1750s to argue that India was richer than Britain is like saying that Uttar Pradesh is richer than Goa today. Later, the Industrial Revolution occurred in the Western world after the Scientific Revolution, with the invention of machines and technologies like the steam engine, and their wealth increased exponentially. Meanwhile, India's global share of GDP dropped to 4% in 1950. The same thing happened in China, which was not directly colonized. In fact, China's per-capita income was even lower than India's at the time of independence. During the 1750s, China's per-capita income was higher than India's. Therefore, if we say that Asian countries are poorer because of colonization, then what happened to countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Ethiopia, and Liberia, which were not colonized? It's worth noting that Nepal has a similar history and culture to India, yet it is the poorest country in Asia. The fact that Nepal was not colonized by the British undermines the argument that colonization is solely responsible for a country's level of poverty. For more information about this topic watch Indian historian Zareer Masani Oxford speech about colonialism.
Correct and more than few people in Britain and America Empire was their divine right. Good luck ever getting them to feel guilt or remorse for that. They love themselves first and foremost. Everyone else comes second if not 9th place.
Indians are taught a lot about world History, from American, French, Industrial, Russian revolutions to similar social and political change in China, Japan, Malaysia and then recent history of cold wars etc all in even High school. Esp recent world history that shaped current modern world and global order.
19:41 The reason it is not talked in the western world is because the villains in this story are their heroes.
Being an Indian, it is moving to see Korbin and Rick speak for India. Thank you guys...
In ancient days India is more advanced than the other countries in the world ,we have a quality that we don't harm anyone,we treat the people as god's when they visit us but that became as our weakness
Rightly said
I an pakistani and my blood boils after watching this video. British literally did the biggest crime by destroying the subcontinent!
Very honest review....thanks for your sincere take. It is said that while the British, French and others took away much of the material wealth fr India, many Germans, particularly philosophers, scholars, scientists took Indian Vedic and other 'Shashtra' knowledge to develop technology, particularly the first rocketry in Europe, before and during the Nazi era. Some prominent names like von Braun and his mentor ( 'guru') Herman Oberth. There is a school of thought that they had learnt the basics of astronautic ideas and tech fr the ancient Hindu texts. Later after WWII von Braun and his team ( estimated to be 3000) of German scientists, technicians were taken in by the American military and intelligence in an ops called 'Paperclip' in US. These ppl were the same who created the base for what later became NASA...there are yt vids on this subject fr channels like 'History'....would be good if you could review...best n cheers
What is India/Bharat? It's certainly difficult. more than 1000 years of widespread destruction, millions were killed, millions of women were raped, and millions were converted. Thousands of years-old temples and universities were destroyed (such as Nalanda University and others) plus Almost 200 years of foreign occupation led to complete financial ruin and the loss of the most precious Indian Artifacts. The country was divided into many parts, leaving it in a situation where standing is impossible. How brutal our history has been, and how unimaginable the situation our ancestors faced was. They preserved our oldest culture and protected our motherland for over 1200 years. Now, we are witnessing the bright future that was once beyond imagination
Interestingly, when the British arrived in India, the concept of beggars as we understand it today did not exist. Here's a fascinating fact: In India, begging had a different connotation. There were individuals known as "Sadhus" who dedicated their lives to learning the ways of life and spirituality. These people spent their entire lives in meditation and had no means of earning a livelihood. During that time, they were referred to as beggars not because they sought alms for themselves but because people recognized their spiritual contributions and provided support to them.
Today, however, the concept of begging in world has evolved into something quite different.
I have a book which is a biography of a poet,writer in odia and he mentioned the massive death of people in that time and he also mentioned the cost of the food and that is very sad that common people can't afford it 😢
This one actually made me cry.... I am falling short of words.
India is the only country in the world that has not initiated any war or invaded any country… we have taught Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam .. means The world is one family… and we still believe that
LONDON BUILT BY INDIAS WEALTH WHICH LOOTED BY BASTOD 💂BRITISHERS. JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
What's good to see is that the technology is spreading truth, and irrespective of ethnicity, color (so called) people (good people) are accepting and realizing the sad truths and facts !
The main problem with the British, and why many still blame them is because (1) they never owned the land. They just saw India as a cash cow (2) all the taxes that were paid by indians went to improve their army and their nation.
One od the reason India still continues to have all the buildings and railways built during the British era is because it was built by our tax money.
When the muslim invations happenned, they might have destroyed many temples and infiltrated their culture, but they owned India. They spent all the taxes within India. So despite them taking over, India still prospered.
Just imagine if British just did their trade instead of completely devastating its people, every technological improvement that happenned over the past 200 yrs would have included Indians.
All the world wars that Britain participated had Indians, all british colonies even now contains Indians.
British should actually be thankful and greatful to Indians that all their infrastruture, roads and schools were actually funded by Indian tax money.
When you are not only looted of wealth, history, pride for 200 yrs, building that back up is an insane task. It might take 50 more yrs to come out of poverty.
Even today many Indian cheapos still thrive for White approval.
Well said..
Whats sad is that modern day british people are completely unaware of all the atrocities they have committed in india and are even taught in history classes that the british "modernized" india and helped us improve economically and socially.
Im sure modern day brits are understanding enough to take some shame or atleast admit the gore their ancestors have committed but its the fact they refuse to teach their citizens any of their ugly colonial history and only teach glorified side of their colonialism boasting of "modernizing" their colonies.
The deliberate erasure of so many main historical massacres and man made famines from their textbooks, seems so cunning, after all even to this day still true to their nature, huh.
Great question Rick! Think about it for a second. America has taken the baton from Britain. Perhaps in the new millennia history will be read along with timelines of economic growth by each country and its administration
Gary Oldman should play Churchill in a movie on Bengal Famine
After this video I saw my house, the society, the area we live in, it's all so lavish... its all because of the Our ancestors made unmatchable efforts.
Rishi sonal becoming prime minister reminds me of shahi tharoor,a famous speech in the British parliament!
U mean Sunak
Just like you realising how bad was Columbus! We Indians have our own fair share of realisation about our misleaded and dictated history that no books teaches you. 😄 We still celebrate some of the so called Great leaders as Great leaders 🙏
💯💯💯
There was a British politician talk about British culture being eroded and taken over by overseas culture, esp Muslim !!! Well...what comes around goes around. You, the Brits created Pakistan/partition, and now you suffer at their hands - Karma.
Thank You guys for bringing up the movie topic... I wish it happens one day...!!
Even after so many decades everybody wants a piece of India. Even these two. That's how powerful India is. You can change the history but can't deny the facts.
Even i don't know this has happened with my ancestors, but i feel like i want to start a war with British and take our money back.
The famine happened that time much more horror than any horror movies. That's why wide man said human is more dangerous than any ghost or beast.
every time i watch this... cannot help but cry
Apparently we have 2 good white men here who love India. That always not happen😂😂❤
They love subscribers. And know that Indians need White folks validation
Ahh...they are also earning through India !
World is one family and Bharat is like the eldest brother who no matter what is available every single time to help his brothers even if they respect or not, support or not still never leaves the family and family members alone during the baddest time. 😊 I'm Proud of Bharat 🚩
In the words of a great western leader “There are some very bad people on both sides” 😂😂
Ofcourse there were
@@TheUniverse245invading other country and calling there were bad people there... 😂
@@Nt-nc9ps there were many indians who worked with britain for their personal profit. Do u think they were good people?
@@TheUniverse245 What are you even talking? What u say makes colonialism right?
True.. because there were bad people on the Indian side as well is one of the reasons that colourism still exists in India and most dark skinned Indians still have lesser opportunities than their light skinned counterparts. There were most definitely bad greedy people on both sides
Even here in India we are not taught many many things about our past, let alone UK or US.
And the worst part is not even the economical destruction, in fact it is the most superficial layer, the White European Christian Coloniser's real success was the mental, spiritual, cultural, institutional & moral subversion, the civilisational plunder & destruction, because that took from us the fundamental ability, the spine to fight back, to rebuild, to grow, teach & learn about our greatness, history, strengths, antiquity, the reality & everything to everything, and that colonially defeated psyche is present even today. It's not the economic sector where we are struggling but the civilisational sector.
We surely need more people like you. Thank you for being honest people.
Hi guys! I have a movie suggestion that you might want to review. It’s called “Hidden Figures”. It’s based on a true story about 3 black women who worked at NASA in the 1960s.
When I goto a restaurant in UK and served by a white British waiter, I leave no tip and put a note saying I will be donating their tip to an Indian charity in their honor.
I often vist Britain.... And when i see it's beautiful cities... I always say it loud.... Wow what a city made out of INDIAN money i like this comment ...
Truth can not be buried forever. One day it will rise up. Thank you guys. Keep up the good work.
Not just UK and USA, even we in Congress ruled India were taught that Industrial Revolution started in Britain.
Even if India was a manufacturing powerhouse, it doesn't make the fact that the Industrial Revolution started in Britain false. The Industrial Revolution refers to mass production in factories of goods. Indian manufacturing was more like individuals doing their own thing. It also refers to Europe specifically.
It did. James Watt invented the steam engine and built factories.
India was a golden bird and now it is regaining its position as the golden eagle.
We were ravaged, looted and tortured for thousand of years yet today we stand as one of the major forces in the international arena.We have the most brilliant and spiritual minds who will retain the lost glory.We are the oldest surviving civilization and our SANATAN DHARMA will stay till eternity.JAI HIND VANDE MATARAM.
This will be starting point to watch about freedom fighters movies
Thyagabhoomi (1939)
Veerapandiya Kattabomman (1959)
Kappalottiya Tamizhan ( 1961)
The dismantling systems actually killed several unique arts, technology, education ...and several things we don't even know. That is the saddest part. That's the reason I hate britsh raj. take our money we will earn some how again. they destroyed our society. Every system that helped people, these arts were developed over thousands of years. and now we will never every regain that. It lost gone. The hard work of our ansestory to develop these technology is gone. Culture takes several thousands of years to develop. Currently we are still struggling with a huge farming population. We are still here, after everything we maintained our culture, maintained our values. We will be here.
took 200 years to loot India while reducing its GDP from 26% to less than 2% besides reducing the population to 90% illiteracy and starvation. Those Indians who helped them perpetuated the same governance with vicious divisive politics based on birth that ensured easy manipulation and exploitation. Huge chunks of wealth was siphoned abroad. That colonial residue persists amongst dynasties littering the landscape and form the main opposition to Bharat and Sanatan Dharma. Both of these predates ANY concept in human history.
The Islamic kingdoms did drain India to send back to The Ottomans and Central Asia as they considered the caliph as their head of state. It’s just that they were consumed with raw hate and were not particularly ingenious.They were more occupied by internal politics like in the slavery driven sultanates where future rulers were slaves who killed their masters.Thats 400 years of Islamic rule. And the Mughals were just spoiled. Most Indian wealth was in the private coffers of the royals,rampant corruption and sons killing fathers to get to the throne.Islamic rule was riddled by violence of religious hate and violence of throne grabbing .This occupied most of their time. This impoverished people but kept the money in India.That is why the Nizam and Mughals were both courted and looted by the British.Stupidity had set in. This actually primed the country to become easy pray for the British because the people who could have defended it were impoverished and the Mughals had no interest in it till the British started targeting them. And by then it was too late.
Imagine looting India and other countries from around the world, and then calling them poor and third world countries and calling yourself developed. What mindset is that ?
Approx 10 million people were directly or indirectly killed by British. Columbus was in search of india but reached America and called the natives Indians as he thought he reached india...even in 1757 there was bengal famine created by British wherein lakhs of people died...India was a super power for 2200 years in last 2500 years...having highest gdp from any where between 25% to 40 %.Maths, geometry, algebra , science has its base in india
Under British rule the average Indian was at least as well off as under there original rulers, with far more rights under law, 400million people in the empire 125 thousand British soldiers to police the whole empire, fight her wars and protect Britain against invasion,, how could that be possible without the cooperation of the vast majority?
Rick...most of the brits who looted India also moved to US. So not taught in US and UK.
made me cry
the torture my people have been under for last millenium, wish there was a time machine so it all could have been undone :(
the worst thing about all this is they wouldn't even acknowledge the horrors their ancestors did, they'd rather mock and stick to their racist insecurities
Send this video to the british journo who opened his big mouth after chandrayan3 😅
I just shed tears listening to this video , even thou i have read the entire history multiple times. Also, mughal invasion wasnt as gud as what it has been showed in this video. Same Will Durant (american historian) says the following ""The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within."
The one civilization that can even claim any victimhood is indian civilization. However, we still work hard march along with the utmost humility and passion. Vasudheiva Kutumbakam is wat our civilization thought us. At least now, i hope those colonized indian minds which are reading this comment should shed their colonial biases and the brainwashed self loathe that has been created on our civilization and its people and come together as indians for our own betterment.
Mughals..👑♥️🙏🏼
mughal did great things for india.... they abolish fight against caste discrimination.... if they didn't invaded, still poor people and their upcoming generation will be slave for brahmins and zamins.... We love mughals❤❤❤ these indian sanghis won't understand this.... they can't accept the defeat.. 😂 mughals made india great❤❤❤
Cartel dear slve paxtani convert troll. Mughal did nothing but loot and destroy temples and built over it. And no it didn't defeat anyone as it was many times defeated by maratha and others. Nor it conquered whole india. It conquered ur region paxtan and converted ur fore fathers in heera mandi. Also Mughals never abolished any imaginary caste system. On contrary Mughals brought backward - woman in tent, submissive woman controlled by man, all non muslims kafir, shia kafir, pay tax to visit temple, harem mujhra kidnapping woman culture.
Secondly, Caste was portuguese word, no such thing or word in Indian religion. Infact Hindus had varna system which means occupation/job and anyone cud become what they want, when they learned skill for it. So don't enforce portuguese thrash on us. Zamindar is Mughal islamic word and culture not indian. And it's still followed in paxtan, not india. India abolished feudal system. Secondly Brahmins never ruled India, no king in India was Brahmin. Brahmins are priests in temple. U andh namazi j,hadis are joke🤣
@@DevilSatan27and u r saying this because u r a Muslim and Mughals were selfish and whatever they did for their selfishness reasons only and nothing else .
@@DevilSatan27 Whoa Delusional much? No invasion can benefit the conquered nation. The whole idea of war is to loot the other party. Any and every invasion is debilitating ---period.
And they made movies in praise of Churchill
😢 really great video made me cry few times..just imagine India's power if British rulers never existed in India ❤❤
India will top 🔝 the chart 📉 one day surely ❤
What we(indians) did to British to show this extreme cruelty. We never curse anyone...but this intending to do.....We bring back our values one day definitely and lead this whole world "Very Fairly and respectfully", till then we develop our brains long lasting sharper than ever......
THANKS SO MUCH FOR YOUR REACTIONS. I WAS, SORT OF, WAITING TO SEE YOUR REACTIONS TO THIS VIDEO........😊
You know not only Bengal but also Bihar was destroyed by the tobacco and Indigo policies of British. Whole Bihar went into alcoholic and used tobacco on daily basis and effects are still can be seen. Many areas in Bihar were industrialized like Munger, Champaran, Patna but all collapsed and till date people become dependent on other states for employment. Madhubani painting and art were destroyed, religion and tourist sites were abandoned and didn't rebuild in same magnificent way again. like Nalanda, Bodh Gaya..
IT’S NOT TALKED
Because We Indians Don’t Care. Let us make our Future…. We don’t wanna stuck in Past.
Kill us if you need to. But Don’t burn our Scriptures and Books and knowledge System.
I wish British never destroyed Gurukul teaching System.
I wish Nalanda University were never burned.
But since Brits mock our poverty and space program they need to know poverty to india is gift from uk. They made richest nation india poor, to make uk rich. Still encash and use Indian jewels and gold throne etc for uk monarch and British museum and charge us to see our own nation artifscts. We need to learn and never frgt so we don't make same mistake of befriending them and trusting them again
Only good thing that came out of British is destroying Gurukul system and ensuring education to all !
What is more painful is that even most Indians aren't taught it in entirety, people don'tget taught much about the industrial and merchantile past of India
Tonne is metric "ton" (1000kg) used worldwide, and yes, that was kinda stupid ❤😂
I actually know privileged Indian women (South Delhi, South Bombay) who think that the British were the best thing that happened to India. Also there are a few South Indians (who have spent most their lives in the South) who actually say that they would prefer British Rule over the current Indian govt. The amount of ignorance and stupidity....I mean it's no shock it took us so long to reclaim our Independence, cause we still have so many traitors!
I have never seen anyone in south Mumbai or south India say so.
@@HeartBeat-fy6fg You are lucky fam
Rick and Korbin should also know that the atrocities and mischievousness of the British and the while race never ended with India's independence in 1947 after some 200 years of colonialism. Before being booted out of India they did the inevitable that an evil mind can only do. Knowing fully well the determination, morale and capability of the Indian people to bounce back from abject poverty and deprivation, they cunningly divided this rich land into two nations so that India can never ever rise again. This was done most strategically on economic and religious lines. Take the case of two of the most prosperous states of Punjab and Bengal. They were partitioned in such a manner that the industrial regions were bifurcated from the fertile hinterland that produced the food and cash crops that were required for the factories. Again, by the Britishers' policy of divide and rule, enmity was created between the two newly formed nations. Thus being on perpetual wars will drain the precious resources and hamper economic growth and development.
I just hate it when Indians beg westerners to feel sorry for Indians....
We were colonised because we were weak militarily ...lesson learned never take your security lightly......
LEARN AND MOVE ON
No one can change the past we can only work for the better future
if you don't know where you came from then you won't be able to appreciate where are we going -by english epitome of India.
Listen you fool,they ruled us without war..they divided our society and the idea of colonisation still in the mind of a good majority,not just in Britishers but in leftist indians..
Lesser u know about history then try to learn about it, we were never weak and our military were very powerful then and we r not begging for apologization from them. y we should?? i mean, they did the bad things not us. they r shameless enough to not to say at least a sorry, as an bharatiye 1 sorry or millions sorry from them ( British) would never ever affect me at all in any way as a bhartiye and as a human. because it was not a mistake it was a SIN which was PLANNED AND DONE..yeah but we made 1 mistake that we believe them and made friendship with them until and unless we came to know of their devil minds for Bharat.
No one is begging west to feel sorry for us. U are isi paxtani troll who self hates urself is not our problem. Even china, japan, America , middle east, Indonesia, africa was colonised.. and it's not just military that's the reason..we had strong military. It's the devide and rule policy..pitting one against another and then making each fight is how they entered middle East, india, africa etc. And yes we have moved on..and now fifth largest economy..doesn't mean we will forget. Lessons of past is needed to be remembered so it doesn't happen in future
The Jews history is taught everywhere and germans feel sorry for that, but the britishers know nothing about the crimes they commited and they are proud that they developed india from poor peasants.
you guys should watch- The legend of bhagat singh of ajay devgan.
Thank you for making this video love from India ❤❤❤❤
The fundamental thing to understand is we lost militarily. Once they won, they just squeezed us ( of course, we would not have done the same if we had won, that's different). However, its important to understand that we have be militarily really strong to defend ourself.
I recommend the video about Ahom Kindom from Odd Compass too.
Mughals could not move all that gold so they tried taking over India. That does not make then our loving angels.. they did the same with indians..
Loved your reaction on this video and would love to see both of you reactions on the video below on the British Indentured Labour History and the Indian Diaspora. As an Indo-Fijian, it's surprising to me how many people, especially Indians, don't know this side of Indian and British history. I hope you both could react to it, as I'd love to know your thoughts on it.
Video Link: th-cam.com/video/MgWU_EUcWlc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=bxvdZqymEk5ilzql
🤯🤯🤯🥶🥶🥶🤬🤬🤬 this is messed up times 100 f##ked upness.
Great content and conversation you both.
I am stunned by this video. Even after growing up in India, I had no idea how insanely brutal the colonial period was. No wonder, Indians still love and go gaga about all things British because the truth is not taught. Love your suggestion guys of using a movie to uncover this hidden atrocity
So because some of our ancestors were evil human beings, anything british should be shunned? The majority of brits, were not alive when this took place. If I was listening to some music or reading a book then found out that the guy who wrote this had grandparents that used to be Nazi's, I wouldn't blame him for it and stop listening or reading?
Yes a TONNE is correct. A TON is an American word.
The white man of UK has got the guts/temerity to produce movies like " The Slumdog millionaire " and insulting Indians but has no balls to make a movie on this issue . Is he also suffering from selective amnesia and guilty of his acts
Never mind he shall be paid in same coin with interest.
The stolen Goods doesn't carry good title
"The East India Company didn't cause a decline in the economy of India, the reverse is true. . .[ and it ] could never have survived without the collaboration and partnership of thousands of Indian merchants, agents, artisans, bankers, and transporters. The Company was the biggest business firm in the world of its time, and therefore, made many Indians fabulously rich. Some of the most famous entrepreneurs and business families of nineteenth-century India made their money trading with the Company or with European merchants. Palatial homes in the north of Calcutta attest to that wealth. These profits were much larger in scale than the profits the Company sent back to England".
Quotation from: The East India Company. The World’s Most Powerful Corporation. Tirthankar Roy, 2012 Penguin Books. Tirthankar Roy, Professor of Economic History, born and educated in India.
+ The British created the system of indentured labour to offset the labour shortage created by the so called stopping of the African slave trade. They don't say that they repackaged the slave trade wirh Indians & renamed it as indentured labour.
They also used the impoverishment they caused to push their religion at us and we suffer from this colonisation to this day.
Remember the point raised by the video about confiscation of lands from peasants who couldn't pay taxes; that land went to the church when the British left India, making the church the second largest land holder in India after the Indian army . Many , even Indians, don't talk about this. The 2 major religions of the world hold a a lot of land & power in India over the Hindu masses., And it is a mockery of intelligence to call them minorities in India. What Indians today suffer from is this tyranny by the erstwhile colonial, oppressive religious minorities who work to this day to break / destroy India further.
It’s our fault. Till date after 75 years of independence we have not been able to show these so called parasitic minorities their place and reclaim our country back. Only hope is Yogi Adityanath that’s it
We are taught about industrial revolution.. renaissance middle ages, dark ages in India ...
Rick is intelligent n educative.. BUT... Korbin has heart n true wisdom.
I don't blame him but he is wrong , Mughals regularly sent women and gold and precious gems back home .
Any anti British movie made by Indians would never be taken seriously. The movie has to be an Indian - Foreign collaboration, just like Gandhi 1982. Really hope Steven Spielberg takes this up, especially after Temple of Doom :D
And now the looted money in Britain are over and pay back time, karma is getting back to them. It's the fact and not assumptions. It's not taught because no father comes back home telling his kids that he has just robbed a bank and bought luxury back home.
Hence, Make in India!!
8:05 that’s how the rest of the world spells tonne (ton). Another Americanism I guess.
Hats off to good thinkers like you
Golden bird india will be back soon😏we still have gold in india,,, recently we found white gold and we found lot of earth rare materials,,still we have everything,,India will be golden bird again😎no one can stop Indian's 😏
🤫🤫🤫🤫
LITTLE BIT MISINFORMATION, FROM 1707 TO 1820 THERE WAS A MARATHA EMPIRE RULLING INDIA, THESE HISTORIANS ALWAYS IGNORE MARATHA AND GLORIFY MUGHALS. BRITISHERS DEFEATED MARATHAS NOT MUGHALS. THERE WERE THREE ANGLO MARATHA WARS BETWEEN 1790 TO 1820. FIRST WON BY MARATHA BUT 2ND N 3RD WON BY BRITISHERS. AND THEN BRITISHERS TOOK OVER INDIA. TRUE HISTORY.
Yess...this is so true.. they also omitts the santhal and other tribal rebellions
Before British Bharat was looted by Islamic invaders
I am from Austin Texas and this is some evil shit they did to my ancestors and motherland they bled her(India) out.
The problem of every Indian is we are intelligent, our knowledge is vast...yet we are pacifist by nature, peace loving. That's why country and civilization that younger and smaller than us able to conquer us.
Imagine what happen if every Indian develop that aggressive mindset like the Mongols? Conquer and expand?
What will happen to the world?
We are RECLAIMING the superpower position, this is not new for us
Tonne vs Ton: British/ Indian spelling vs American spelling. See, this is what the Brits did to us. We even use their spelling.
Yes and I also hate that indians try to speak as perfect British English as possible and I think that the Indian style of speaking is dumb or whatever. We should embrace our style of English and make our own Indian English like American English.
No it's not. They are two different units.
@@tsram Really? What are they units of, and what's the relationship between them?
@@nohaybanda Both are units of weight.
Tonne is 1000 kg Ton is 1016 kg
@ourstupidreactions "Tonne" is the British varient spelling of "Ton"
Of course we know about Bob Barker.. well we did not watch his show but we know him .. because He is Barney Stinson Father.
Indians do deserve this for not standing with each other and because of the traitors the country was looted, crushed, divided, robbed. I am an Indian and not happy to say this.