As a Bengali, I've heard from my elders that the Bengali weavers here used to make sarees so light that you could pass them through your marriage ring 💍. But then the British came in, broke their looms and thumbs so that even if they recover they won't have that finesse in their work. They put taxes as high as 80% and forced these weavers into farming indigo for them. We were basically treated like their slaves. In 1859, these former weavers and now presently indigo farmers revolted against the British with violence. Many of our leaders were martyred but ultimately they had to stop indigo farming temporarily in 1860-62 and permanently in 1900.
@@jaydeepsen4769 as you made the claim, you're the one supposed to prove the point. However, hearsay propaganda is not a trustworthy source for a debate on history, especially when it's from an Indian nationalist perspective. We know your kind of 'history' - it's in every 2nd Bollywood movie. And you wonder why British news outlets might be biased against india (seen on WION yesterday)...?
You are trying to imply some sort of colonial policy here. Truth was different though. Historians have noted that unlike the "First War of Indian Independence", the Indigo revolt did not direct their hostility towards the British colonial authorities but instead focused their attention towards European planters and merchants; historian Subhas Bhattacharya noted in The Indigo Revolt of Bengal (1977) that the "movement began and ended as a struggle against the planters." It was the planters who made malicious contracts with some Bengali farmers. In 1860, the British colonial authorities formed the Indigo Commission due to Nawab Abdul Latif's initiative with the goal of putting an end to the repressions of indigo planters (by passing the Indigo Act 1862). Stop portraying everyone as evil Britishers. At least learn some factual history
The 2 waves of invasion suffered by India is most bloodiest in the history of mankind on earth. The act of 2 Abrahmic religion is barbaric resulting in loss of life more than 10 cr. despite India being s rich country.
One correction - the presenter speaks of Mughal rule as though they loved India. No, as any other Islamic invader, they laid claim on the land too and carried out Islamization and thus destroying the civilization as a whole.
See one thing that most people think that mughal made india rich is wrong - India was the world's largest economy with a 32.9 per cent share of the worldwide GDP in the first century and 28.9 per cent in the 11th century. In 1700, when most part of the country was ruled by Mughals, India had a 24.4 per cent world GDP share, higher than entire Europe's 23.3 per cent. so ....
But you are not taking into account that 24.4 percent from 1700 during Mughal times is much larger amount than the 32.9 percent in the first century, the reason why India was so ahead because rest of Europe were in the dark ages but even after Europe and china catching up in the 1700 , the Mughal India was still able to have such a large share, not even taking into account that the discovery of the Americas had fueled the rest of the Europe to develop rapidly even then we were ahead
He has quoted words from the Foreigners in the video who raised their voice. Also Britains situation now can also be seen as compared to India since there is no India now that they can loot. Also the British Museum where they took all the valuables from India. They colonized so many countries and looted them of their wealth. Means whatever Britain is now is because of the looted wealth from everywhere. But see in the right hands where India has risen in the last 9 years.
sir that was not 43 billion but 43 trillion dollars.For your information, let me tell you that the entire GDP of the present USA is near 50 trillion dollars.
As Indians, we should preserve our culture and traditions in the modern day (not by fighting amonst each other over differences) but to excel. Traditional India was way ahead in the world than the westernized one we're all living in.
Todays Germans are not to be blamed for atrocities of nazi, despite that, they admitted their countrys wrongdoings....they apologized, sincerely. They even paid for reparations done during WW2. When it comes to Britain, they, as a country (not people individually) are not apologizing. Two reasons comes in my mind. One, they actually dont feel sorry, and feel that they did India any favor, two, they cant afford to say sorry. They maybe think it will/may cost their economy too much. We are trying and somewhat succeeding, to bounce back. We are not a developing country, we are a reclaiming country. They should apologize on global stage, and give us (and other colonies) everything they looted from us. Why the hell are we even member of Commenwealth?
As long as the whole of india was united meaning under the rule of one king they were never defeated they resisted invaders from greece turkey mongolia mughals Persia even the Roman's
they also divided india based on religion that is why pakistan bangladesh happend and that is why khalistan is happning but reality is india cannot exist as a strong nation without all being togheter infact they europians stole the idea of unity in diversity to boost economy in europe but divided the same nation where they got idea from
True breaking India from Pakistan was the main reason to put a leash on India ..they let Pakistan make there nukes.. imagine a terrorist country having nukes ...and they don't condemn them...they support them..America has given many loans to Pakistan ,,ImF too ..they know literally that Pakistan promotes terrorism still they give money to support there terror.@@toxoreed9334
nothing changed, cuz it wasn't people of Britain nor its government nor its army, but one company which ruled over India; now, that company is split into many and they still rule over India and almost (?) any other country... countries are recent invention (last 100 yrs) which serve for the company to protect its interests, collect taxes, bring oppressing laws, pay the police, army and bureaucracy, run the jails, brain-wash the children and adults, etc. The Company doesn't care if one is Indian, Mexican or Papuan - if they see their interest they'll come to take it by force and tricks
Thousands of years of genetic memory is in an Indians vein . Imagine, trying to destroy a rich culture, how did this happen, because Hindus were docile and didn’t know what fighting was, as they were used to living and let living intelligently 🙏🇮🇳
The policy of NON VIOLENCE AND anti -defensice and offensive policies MADE INDIA SUFFER FOR CENTURIES....but lately India has started to alter all these LACUNAES.
Non violence and peaceful living was the principle of IVC dravidian culture. The aryans fighting culture is evident by the account of wars, killings , destructions detailed in rig veda iotself !
The reason British able to control India is because of their value system. Indians were taught to follow non violence and treat the world like a family . I am happy that the younger generation is revalidating these principles and seeing countries the way they are
Isse liye bharath sone ke chidiya hai itna sab lutne ke baad aaj ka bharath British ko bhi peche chor chuka hai ise liye mujhe garav hai mein bhartiy hu
And India was always rich and well off even before the Mughals invaded. All the invaders be it mughals or British just looted and tortured Indians. Our scriptures were burnt which contained so many mysteries and knowledge of the universe. Some of them were stolen. We were advanced even in the ancient times but the invasions was a reason that our success came to a recession. And we were known to as a land of poor.
I think we were invaded multiple times because we were fighting among ourselves and betraying our selves. Only kings and their Army was responsible for our protection and because of caste system in Hinduism only warrior caste people stood up and rest of us kept tolllerenting Invaders. I think that's the main reason Sikh gurus formed Sikhism to make people United and bring warrior spirit in them. Being a Hindu my self I would have hoped Sikhism to have spread to the whole sub continent.
Cast system was brought in by the British! It was used to categorise people by trade. Do not confuse it with The Varna system which is. Model for society. Kshatriya is warrior and Hindu families would send their mature sons to be a kshatriya they made up the fighting army! Real Sikhs are sanatanis. We need sanathan dharma to spread not a religion!!
@@KaiMia-xc9lk I believe caste system existed even before British came here and British amplified it used it to segregate us. The most educated people in our society are Brahmins, so they must have figured out that caste system was not prescribed in any of our scriptures yet they kept on practicing it. Why do they still hold the temple priest position, which is exclusively reserved for them. Why can't they follow verna system where anyone can become priest by simply learning vedas, etc., and by showing their devotion to god ? Brahmans should be protector of Hinduism but here they are the reason we are not able to move forward from our past.
@@GG-pe4kzCaste system was not religious it is much more like societal thing. There is no evidence of caste system based on birth. But rather caste system was based on your abilities.
As a Bengali, I've heard from my elders that the Bengali weavers here used to make sarees so light that you could pass them through your marriage ring 💍. But then the British came in, broke their looms and thumbs so that even if they recover they won't have that finesse in their work. They put taxes as high as 80% and forced these weavers into farming indigo for them. We were basically treated like their slaves. In 1859, these former weavers and now presently indigo farmers revolted against the British with violence. Many of our leaders were martyred but ultimately they had to stop indigo farming temporarily in 1860-62 and permanently in 1900.
Ohh 😮😢
Lies bro
@@jaydeepsen4769 as you made the claim, you're the one supposed to prove the point. However, hearsay propaganda is not a trustworthy source for a debate on history, especially when it's from an Indian nationalist perspective. We know your kind of 'history' - it's in every 2nd Bollywood movie. And you wonder why British news outlets might be biased against india (seen on WION yesterday)...?
We know for sure that British breaking thumbs of loom weavers is a myth. It's not more trustworthy just because Tharoor said it, it's a blatant lie.
You are trying to imply some sort of colonial policy here. Truth was different though. Historians have noted that unlike the "First War of Indian Independence", the Indigo revolt did not direct their hostility towards the British colonial authorities but instead focused their attention towards European planters and merchants; historian Subhas Bhattacharya noted in The Indigo Revolt of Bengal (1977) that the "movement began and ended as a struggle against the planters." It was the planters who made malicious contracts with some Bengali farmers. In 1860, the British colonial authorities formed the Indigo Commission due to Nawab Abdul Latif's initiative with the goal of putting an end to the repressions of indigo planters (by passing the Indigo Act 1862).
Stop portraying everyone as evil Britishers. At least learn some factual history
was a golden bird for a reason !! we will fly high again
But most common people were very poor.
Education and discipline is a must for that, not just in schools but at a personal level..
@@mudra5114well not at the prime economy it was later as islamic invasions happened
It’s terrible to know the extent the British gone to rule over India. Really great that you both reacted to this video.
Very sad 😢 but God bless India 🇮🇳 🙏 jai hind Bharat 🙏
They still tried to maintain control of the Indian subcontinent after partition. Anyway, thanks for reacting:)
@@abhinandan2664we still paying taxes for Railway tracks to Britain 😂
The 2 waves of invasion suffered by India is most bloodiest in the history of mankind on earth. The act of 2 Abrahmic religion is barbaric resulting in loss of life more than 10 cr. despite India being s rich country.
One correction - the presenter speaks of Mughal rule as though they loved India. No, as any other Islamic invader, they laid claim on the land too and carried out Islamization and thus destroying the civilization as a whole.
Did you actually watch the video or chose to ignore what he said about the Mugals? 🤔
@@RustyDustyCrustydid you read what he said?
Did you actually saw in the video what was said about mughals?
See one thing that most people think that mughal made india rich is wrong -
India was the world's largest economy with a 32.9 per cent share of the worldwide GDP in the first century and 28.9 per cent in the 11th century. In 1700, when most part of the country was ruled by Mughals, India had a 24.4 per cent world GDP share, higher than entire Europe's 23.3 per cent.
so ....
But you are not taking into account that 24.4 percent from 1700 during Mughal times is much larger amount than the 32.9 percent in the first century, the reason why India was so ahead because rest of Europe were in the dark ages but even after Europe and china catching up in the 1700 , the Mughal India was still able to have such a large share, not even taking into account that the discovery of the Americas had fueled the rest of the Europe to develop rapidly even then we were ahead
43 trillion dollars is still a estimate some survey say it was over 50 trillion dollars
He has quoted words from the Foreigners in the video who raised their voice. Also Britains situation now can also be seen as compared to India since there is no India now that they can loot. Also the British Museum where they took all the valuables from India. They colonized so many countries and looted them of their wealth. Means whatever Britain is now is because of the looted wealth from everywhere. But see in the right hands where India has risen in the last 9 years.
Modi hai to mumkin hi. Jai Hindu rashtra 🚩🚩🚩
🖕 The mullahs & islam
Well Said Brother 👌🏻🇮🇳
honestly, after watching this...something in me esp my blood is rattling as if they are telling me about my ancestors who suffered the hunger.
$42Trillion not billion removed is staggering
And thats just the monetary value. Wasted and lost time is even more damage.
@lastword8783 and confidence. People and worse, Bongs. still love Churchill , Hitler for Bengalis...
Such is the confidence dent since Bose days
Happy that you react bro and sis ❤ from Lucknow.
sir that was not 43 billion but 43 trillion dollars.For your information, let me tell you that the entire GDP of the present USA is near 50 trillion dollars.
That not correct now only have 29 trillion
Churchill ordered stopped food supplies killing 4 million Indians in 1943 in Bengal region
As Indians, we should preserve our culture and traditions in the modern day (not by fighting amonst each other over differences) but to excel. Traditional India was way ahead in the world than the westernized one we're all living in.
Its not 45 billion dollars..they kept 45 trillion dollars from india😢
Well India is yet to recieve official apology from UK !!
We now have bigger economy than them... And we have just started 🤟
Kohinoor leke apne pass Rakhlo Sureet, jab India aao leti aana ❤
Bollywood needs to make a movie about it.
bollywood? 😂 bollywood and leftist historians were the prime people who altered india's history, bollywood always mock india
Definitely.
Todays Germans are not to be blamed for atrocities of nazi, despite that, they admitted their countrys wrongdoings....they apologized, sincerely. They even paid for reparations done during WW2.
When it comes to Britain, they, as a country (not people individually) are not apologizing. Two reasons comes in my mind. One, they actually dont feel sorry, and feel that they did India any favor, two, they cant afford to say sorry. They maybe think it will/may cost their economy too much. We are trying and somewhat succeeding, to bounce back.
We are not a developing country, we are a reclaiming country.
They should apologize on global stage, and give us (and other colonies) everything they looted from us.
Why the hell are we even member of Commenwealth?
As long as the whole of india was united meaning under the rule of one king they were never defeated they resisted invaders from greece turkey mongolia mughals Persia even the Roman's
A great video🙌
By India in this video, he meant whole India, including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Nepal
we may be down in list for few year but we will come back in top of the list
they also divided india based on religion that is why pakistan bangladesh happend and that is why khalistan is happning but reality is india cannot exist as a strong nation without all being togheter infact they europians stole the idea of unity in diversity to boost economy in europe but divided the same nation where they got idea from
Punjab was an Independent Sikh kingdom before the British annexed it and handed it over to India and Pakiistan in 1947 .
@@mohandhanoa4797 so does every state of india
True breaking India from Pakistan was the main reason to put a leash on India ..they let Pakistan make there nukes.. imagine a terrorist country having nukes ...and they don't condemn them...they support them..America has given many loans to Pakistan ,,ImF too ..they know literally that Pakistan promotes terrorism still they give money to support there terror.@@toxoreed9334
nothing changed, cuz it wasn't people of Britain nor its government nor its army, but one company which ruled over India; now, that company is split into many and they still rule over India and almost (?) any other country... countries are recent invention (last 100 yrs) which serve for the company to protect its interests, collect taxes, bring oppressing laws, pay the police, army and bureaucracy, run the jails, brain-wash the children and adults, etc. The Company doesn't care if one is Indian, Mexican or Papuan - if they see their interest they'll come to take it by force and tricks
That company ruled India until 1857 , then the British government took over .
There's no difference, it's also a company.
Do a vlog on the loot house of London...
Also Mughals and other Muslim leaders Looted India before British (Muslims-700years & British-200years)
Muslims: 500 years.British-150years.
Okay past can not be healed but be asssured we will fly again and we have just taken our flight ❤
Thousands of years of genetic memory is in an Indians vein .
Imagine, trying to destroy a rich culture, how did this happen, because Hindus were docile and didn’t know what fighting was, as they were used to living and let living intelligently 🙏🇮🇳
The indus dravidians were docile and didnt know what fighting was , but marauding aryans distroyed the beautiful culture
@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg Seriously ? Dravidian navy controlled half of Asia.
@@anugranmathimugan2778 They attacked any place) country. ?
Sailors , not navy !
@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg Yeah of course we did parts, of the Malaysian and Indonesian peninsulas . Chola navy was the strongest in Asia at that time .
@@anugranmathimugan2778 Chola period is about 1000CE , but we are speaking about IVC times !
Now this is my Era I m hindu bharatiy
Now the reverse colonialism began.. indians buying most British companies and startups 😜
I’m ashamed of my British heritage when I learn about this
British always destroy what thay touch. Serbia knows that very well. Happy New Year Sureet and Stevie🎉🎉 All the Best in 2024.
LOL remind me of Yugoslavia eh.
❤❤❤❤
Hello guys...😊
The policy of NON VIOLENCE AND anti -defensice and offensive policies MADE INDIA SUFFER FOR CENTURIES....but lately India has started to alter all these LACUNAES.
Non violence and peaceful living was the principle of IVC dravidian culture.
The aryans fighting culture is evident by the account of wars, killings , destructions detailed in rig veda iotself !
Hi guys, Please React to "Husn" by Anuv Jain, I'm sure you guys would love it. ❤
I've been requesting for so long....
The reason British able to control India is because of their value system. Indians were taught to follow non violence and treat the world like a family . I am happy that the younger generation is revalidating these principles and seeing countries the way they are
What bout Mughals 700 yrs 🤯🤯
Hi guys please react to Still Number one Salman khan tribute by sahil sheikh please ❤ 🙏 i have been requesting for a long time please respond Stevie k
Isse liye bharath sone ke chidiya hai itna sab lutne ke baad aaj ka bharath British ko bhi peche chor chuka hai ise liye mujhe garav hai mein bhartiy hu
Read about how the Indian education system destroyed by britts
And India was always rich and well off even before the Mughals invaded. All the invaders be it mughals or British just looted and tortured Indians. Our scriptures were burnt which contained so many mysteries and knowledge of the universe. Some of them were stolen. We were advanced even in the ancient times but the invasions was a reason that our success came to a recession. And we were known to as a land of poor.
Guru mujhe to na samajh inki aa rhi agar bhai h to bta do in he bhi aaj ki date mein hum hindustani kya hai...
this vid always makes me uncomfortable & tear up...
This is Not True Indian people believe that Muslims Did This loot and Indian Election Totally Depends on Muslim Criticism .
Karma hits back
Sir and mam please manoj muntashir ji guru tegh bahadur ji Prakash parv special 👌 🙏
I think we were invaded multiple times because we were fighting among ourselves and betraying our selves.
Only kings and their Army was responsible for our protection and because of caste system in Hinduism only warrior caste people stood up and rest of us kept tolllerenting Invaders.
I think that's the main reason Sikh gurus formed Sikhism to make people United and bring warrior spirit in them.
Being a Hindu my self I would have hoped Sikhism to have spread to the whole sub continent.
Cast system was brought in by the British! It was used to categorise people by trade. Do not confuse it with The Varna system which is. Model for society. Kshatriya is warrior and Hindu families would send their mature sons to be a kshatriya they made up the fighting army! Real Sikhs are sanatanis. We need sanathan dharma to spread not a religion!!
@@KaiMia-xc9lk I believe caste system existed even before British came here and British amplified it used it to segregate us. The most educated people in our society are Brahmins, so they must have figured out that caste system was not prescribed in any of our scriptures yet they kept on practicing it.
Why do they still hold the temple priest position, which is exclusively reserved for them. Why can't they follow verna system where anyone can become priest by simply learning vedas, etc., and by showing their devotion to god ?
Brahmans should be protector of Hinduism but here they are the reason we are not able to move forward from our past.
@@GG-pe4kzCaste system was not religious it is much more like societal thing. There is no evidence of caste system based on birth. But rather caste system was based on your abilities.
Why do u stay In UK ?????
Good to stay in UK and not work , the British government will look after you . At least there is a little pay back from them .
I don't know who are these idiots who keeps asking people of Indian background to react to their history 😂. Happy new year everyone
So what's wrong with it?
React on emiway w
Karma .... British will pay for their sins some day .... 150 years of darkness
React to guntur kaaram movie "kurchi madathapetti" song 😍🔥🔥🔥
Total gaming ajju bhai face reveal video review
Hi guys, Please React to "Husn" by Anuv Jain, I'm sure you guys would love it. ❤
I've been requesting for so long....
Hi guys, Please React to "Husn" by Anuv Jain, I'm sure you guys would love it. ❤
I've been requesting for so long....
Hi guys, Please React to "Husn" by Anuv Jain, I'm sure you guys would love it. ❤
I've been requesting for so long....
Hi guys, Please React to "Husn" by Anuv Jain, I'm sure you guys would love it. ❤
I've been requesting for so long....