To anyone complaining that we shouldn’t be putting the a7 III in this comparison, let me ask, why not? It’s the current model in the price range that compares to the other two. So yea, that’s why it’s here. Not to mention it’s still a fantastic option and one of the, if not the most revolutionary mirrorless camera ever. So when they release the 4, we will we do this video once again.
Absolutely! Was looking for my first full frame camera and wanted to go mirrorless. I decided to go with A7 III because the glass is cheaper. I also got my first real glass (Sigma 85mm 1.4 DN DG). Comparable system in Nikon or Canon would be much pricier.
The answer? Any one of them. If you can't get great results from a modern $2,000+ camera, the problem isn't the camera, its you. It's the photographer that counts.
Such a testament to the Sony A7iii that it can still hang with the latest models. Great camera and all you Canon & Nikon guys can really thank Sony for giving the market the huge shake up it needed.
Not really, I prefer SLR but I think Canon and Nikon will not invest anymore in this techno and are going 100% mirorless. Am a photo guy, not a video guy, SLR fulfill my need at a lower price tag (both body and lenses...)
So many people looking for confirmation that they bought the best camera. If it does what you need it to do, then it is the right camera for you. I still use a Nikon D200 I bought around 2008.
This! I'm still using a Sony a7 mark 1 but it still does the job. I am looking to upgrade though, since the screen has got some dead pixels now and I'm having some other hardware issues, and think the Canon R6 is best for me. But like I said in another comment, you wouldn't be disappointed with any of these cameras, especially if you choose based on which system you're most comfortable with!
hah yeah i just recently swaped my EOS D60 ive been using for so so long with a 80D, it can still kick out a great image with a bit of work but you can see when it suffers
I used a D200 for many years, eventually upgraded to a D800 then D850 because I needed the resolution, but the D200 was an absolute beast. Pure workhorse, over a million frames on it never once missed a beat. It was dropped on rocks, knocked about daily, doused in saltwater, caught in a sandstorm and all the surfaces were worn down mirror smooth, but it never failed me once. I still have it and it still works just fine.
Have had my a7iii over a year now and I don’t regret it. As a beginner hobbyist it’s probably too much camera, but I just love it and always have a blast taking photos plus it doubles as a great video camera for family events. Highly recommend it.
@@legionator there is a Canon adapter for the Z series that gives full AF and data, which is better than its own Ftz. So you can use canon lenses on the nikon
Was able to cover multiple events no problem with the original z6, but I welcome the updated AF performance with the z6ii as it's made my shooting experience a lot better in low-light. Considering that I did tons of events from the D7000, to the D750, the z6ii is a real winner!
@@Ritalie The camera industry is moving towards mirrorless systems and Nikon stayed on the DSLR ship till it sank… So technological aspects compared to the other 2 are "behind" in a sense. I'm going to stick with Nikon though because that just means they have guides and references as they develop their technology. Just my opinion.
I have the A7 III since it first came out, and I switched from D800e. Three years later it's so awesome that Nikon/Canon just caught up. I can't wait to see what Sony does with A7 IV
I can! I just got the a7iii 6 months ago and realllllly dont wanna spend 3-4k on a new camera XD especially after i just got the sony g master 70-200 f2.8. my wallet will die.
@@AmitabhJangra I have used them, and on the basis of that you cannot say this, the a7iii is on a level higher than the flagship 5d iv. You can't just make a judgement based on how much something costs.
Jared you help people during this COVID situation. You help ease our minds with something interesting, positive, and creative. Mind health is important. Thank you FroBro
I have to say, everything I see points me towards a Sony or Canon, but I’m not sure what it is, I just like the Nikon more and I’m not sure if I’d be happy with anything else
The Sony a7iii is on sale for $1798 right now body only. I was able to get it new (relative in the sense it had no shutter count) for $1600. The canon is at $2499 still body only. Going to try an adapter to use my friends really nice Nikon glass soon including a a vintage film one.
I am thinking the same way. I am a Nikon shooter wanting to go full frame from D500 & 7200. Almost bought the D850, but it looks like mirrorless is the way to go. Usability weighs heavy against the Sony for me but the specs and lenses are there. If I go mirrorless, I will be changing mounts either way I go. It's a tough decision. I may buy the original Z7 or the new Z6ii to replace my D7200 with the hope that Nikon catches up with a Z wildlife camera in the future. I am really hoping Nikon does something special with their long lenses. I think a lightweight 600pf will fit nicely in the Nikon lineup and the competition. I think people would buy the Z bodies to take advantage of the lenses. Thank you Jared for putting this together. Usability is tough to gage and highly personal but a few sample comparisons might be beneficial. Switch from stills to video and back, programing buttons, switch in and out of tracking mode, waking up from sleep mode might be comparable features.
The fact that the 3 year old camera is still holding up to the brand new cameras is impressive. Wait until Sony releases the A7IV we'll see who wins then.
@@richardgorski23 Agreed on the menus and handling. I've been thinking about getting a Z6 II but if Sony fixes those two issues that you mentioned, I'm seriously going to consider switching over from Nikon to Sony.
I mean, honestly any 3 yr old camera is still performing very well these days. New features and advancnts are always being made, but the tech is mature enough that the capability is pretty high across the board.
I upgraded to the Canon R6 I love it. Couple different reasons because of three different wheels that makes it easy to change Shutter speed, Fstop & iso recommend anybody the camera.
Good to know as I'm looking to buy either one of them. Making a choice is so hard when you can't hold them... I live in a very small town and I have to buy the camera online 😭
Nikon. Best color. Best video options. Amazing updated AF. Best future outlook now that Sigma and Tamron announced they are making Z lenses. Forgot to mention 12-bit ProRes on Nikon.
Love Jared, watched all reviews for cameras and lenses, still bought the nikon zll, best ergonomics, best lenses, best interface, great autofocus, yeah I said it, GREAT AUTOFOCUS!
Alex, I’m with you 100%. I’ve watched all of Jared’s reviews, and even had the R6 ordered. At the last moment, my final takeaway from Jared was that even though he pushes hard for Canon, that he still strongly supports and shows love for Nikon and their superb image quality. I called and chanced my order to the Z6 II, and have never looked back.
As a former Nikon shooter I wish there were more nice things that could be said about Nikon. Unfortunately it seems likely that having mostly caught up to what the three year old A7III can do Sony will release the A7IV and then Nikon (and probably Canon) will be playing catch-up again. It's also incredible to have high quality 3rd party glass available that uses officially licensed protocols! Nikon and Canon still haven't learned that lesson.
@@DB-sd3cw Cameras with mirrors are dead technology. There are real advantages to mirrorless such as the sensor being closer to the lens and being able to see *exactly* what the camera will capture though the viewfinder. People will continue to cling to DSLRs for a while but there is no future for that tech.
Moving from DSLR, I was choosing between Canon R6 and Sony a7Riii. Ended up going with Canon, mostly due to ergonomics and overall feel. Can't go wrong with any system.
@@jdam28k did you try using both these cameras? Go to a camera store and try using them. Pick whichever feels good in your hands. What I implying is that do not decide on ergonomics just by looking at their images on screen.
@@nightfury4756 yeah I did, hence my comment, I still prefer the r6 for ergos, not to say the z6 is bad at all, quite the opposite, I just don’t think they are as good as the dslr counterparts or the Canons currently.
17:14 - learned photography on manual film cameras... But every time someone says they prefer manual focus to me, I think to myself "you probably also prefer using an outhouse"
The videos that you made with the z6 on the studio was better, the skin tone that you had looked like art, i have to say i was amazed by the set up, now you look much more pale...
That’s the biggest regret I have switching z6 -> r5. The skin tone is not as good in video and when I do zoom, I lost that movie-like dreamy feel people had commented on my z6 setup. Yes, I am very serious about my zoom meetings and use my mirrorless setup as much for zoom as for photography.
The Nikon RAW files can't save you from taking a bad selfie with those panda eyes. If you don't learn to see the light it doesn't matter what is in your hands you may as well have a phone!...
@@amiraligol I did more to help him with my comment than hurt him. If he & you by the sounds of it can't handle criticism photography is not for you pick an easier profession!.
I don't own any Nikon glass, but I think it's worth mentioning that if you buy the Z6 ii from B&H photo right now, you can get an F-to-Z mount adapator for just $50. So if you were already a Nikon owner, you can keep using for F glass with about the same level of (in)convenience as the Canon users adapting their EF mount lenses on R bodies.
Upgraded to the Z6ii, very happy so far with how it performs and thankfully the dude that bought my Z6 off of me was willing to let me keep the Nikon battery and give him the 4 3rd party batteries that I had (because they weren't compatible with the Z6ii)
I enjoyed the video, as always! I appreciate all the background work you put into making these videos. I’d love to see a comparison between the high-res models (the Sony a7riv vs. Canon R5 vs. Nikon Z7ii). Or a revamped comparison between Sony cameras (maybe once the a7iv is released).
Regarding E-mount lenses .. Not only the 3rd party native lenses but since you already mentioned Canon's own first party adapter ... you forgot to mention that both Nikon and Sony have these two for their respective F and A mount glass as well. And with the E-mount you also get the 3rd-party adapters for just about everything including vintage Leica glass on mounts like M42 up to even Canon EF glass (and this with full AF capabilities and minimal drawbacks). Sure, Canon's adapter may be more seamless and less confusing or limited than the other two systems but at least it's worth the mention that the other systems also have their own equivalents; and with Sony you even get a much wider selection of lenses AND mounts/adapters to choose from.
Thanks for your valued insight into these 3 cameras. I've been shooting Canon since I got my first Canon AE-1 Program in 1979. I've got several pieces of Canon and 3rd party glass for Canon which would make it very expensive for me to switch from Canon (which is why I was interested in watching this video). And, considering all of the specs and features of the R6 vs the other 2 bodies, it seems the additional $500 (over the Nikon) will be worth my investment (since I also won't be forced to buy a whole new inventory of lenses). Thanks, again for your valued analysis.
Your review failed to mention Nikon’s equivalent ZTF adaptor opening up the Z cameras access to Huge library of both Nikon and 3rd party lenses. I don’t deny Canon may have technical superior features, but the Canon’s price puts it out of my budget... the Z6II lets me do everything I need of it at a price I can afford
@@irutgers Yes. There are many really good screw drive lenses, and they are much cheaper. Btw, some of them don't have a modern equivalent, like 180 mm 2.8D lens.
@@irutgers No, Canon and Sony cameras never had in-body autofocus motors. So, there are no such lenses in their systems. Btw, Nikon F-mount is very old, it was introduced in 1958.
Damn. Never been more tempted to go with the Canon, even though I've been leaning toward Sony because of their awesome third party lens choices. I'm already a Canon shooter, so the R6 may just 'feel' right. Comparing menu systems/interfaces could have helped.
One thing you missed Jared, how the camera's switch back and forth from photo to video. The Nikon does this really well. As a hybrid shooter this is so important. According to Taylor Jackson who liked the R6 he said he wouldn't use it for this because it doesn't save all the settings automatically like Nikons do.
Yeah I was going to say, the Nikon should be given the win in the segment due to RAW video, best switching ability for hybrid use, and lack of overheating issues that the Canon has.
Picked up a Nikon z6ii a few months ago as an upgrade from my Nikon D610 DSLR. Really loved all of the neat mirrorless features, and thought the autofocus was pretty good … … until I realized it wasn’t. I tried recording selfie-style video with AF-F and the z6ii constantly, stubbornly would stay stuck on the background. I’d jump around, wave my hands in front like a madman, but if there was something the camera found compelling in the background, it would just. Not. Let. Go. Frustrating. So now I’m waiting on a delivery of a Canon R6, and taking photos of my Z gear to sell it on eBay. I’m a bit sad. I really wanted to love the z6ii. I really did. But it just couldn’t do even the most basic things I needed it to do.
That, plus the fact that it is EXTREMELY future proof. Glass is expensive so its great there are cheaper options via 3rd parties, and all of the a7 and a9 cameras use the same mount so its a smooth transition to the next Sony body 5-10 years from now. Personally, i feel like that is the most important as a semi-pro photographer.
If you are a beginner and want a full frame mirror less camera that is good for video and photography the A7 III is not the best but it is damn good even in 2020. The inexpensive body, inexpensive SD cards and inexpensive 3rd party lenses make it the best bang for the buck hands down!
One thing that bothers me when people (not only you Jared) analyze the mount in the cameras is that they do so solely from the perspective of lens availability and lens price. The Z mount, being larger, allows for better quality images regardless of the lens, since it allows for more light to get into the camera and all the lens elements are closer to the sensor (shorter path length) than in all the other cameras.
Great video... lens affordability is a huge factor with these systems. Used EF (with the outstanding Canon adaptor with ring controller), and 3rd Party Sony offerings for me personally make Canon and Sony the more attractive options. I think the A7IV will put the money ball squarely back in Sony's court (with Tammy glass it's the most economic option as well). 30 mp with 12 fps is my sweet spot.
Nice comparison as always Jared! It's been a while since I've visited your channel and glad I had this on while I'm editing today. I've got the full Z-series now, but I still enjoy knowing a little about each of the models you've featured here in this video. I'm locked in on the Z7 II and enjoying the new lineup of lenses. I wish you all the best throughout 2021! :)
16:10 you made a mistake when you said Nikon allows you to touch and drag focus on screen. You meant Canon and Sony, not Nikon an Sony. You can’t drag focus on Nikon.
Getting back into photography after a decade hiatus. Have a D70 and love it, but want to do more. Was looking a Nikon only. After this comparison, I'm seriously looking at Canon. Thanks for making this.
I dunno about the lens check mark, Fro. True that, Sony has a selection of third party lenses. But, Canon has the least expensive native glass! I dunno about the EVF check mark, Fro. The biggest complaint with mirrorless cameras is EVF blackout during continuous shooting. The Canon has no blackout compared to other two bodies.
@@jaymontez78 not yet as I haven't found one in my area. I'm now using Sigma 85mm f1.4 new version lens though it has some distortion issue can be fixed in post. I'm thinking to pick 24 70 sigma or 28 75 tamron in this year.
Hey Jared. Im the infamous "is 20MP enough to blow up when I need to crop?" guy. THANKS FOR MAKING THIS!!! I couldnt wait - upgraded from D750 only 6 months after buying it to the R6 last month based on two comments you made: (Re: Eye-AF) "Getting shots I otherwise wouldve missed." BYE NIKON. And (Re: Sony) - not comfortable to hold. Eye-AF what a world of difference. True next gen stuff. Like a car vs a horse, full stop. How can you even consider Nikon without Eye-AF?? Shameful. R6 is so good I almost feel like I havent earned the shots Im getting. Like bright clear photos in the dark no flash while actively chasing a baby. Lotta stabilization helping me out. Only caveat - Im a newbie and almost returned the R6 until I realized I bought the absolute garbage variable aperture lens. Canon makes the 24-105 in F4-6.1 (variable, kill yourself) and F4 (fixed). Wonder how many newbies will buy the variable lens unknowingly and accept bad photos or return the camera. Cant wait to buy some RF glass. Jared would be cool for you to do a video comparing the costs and benefits of RF vs EF glass. Probably some great deals out there for EF glass now.
And had to update the EVF to max frame rate on the R6. At lower frame rate the EVF is unimpressive, painful if you are switch from an OVF. Vari angle touchscreen on the R6 is cool for tripod remote trigger group portraits. But painstaking for shooting kids. Tilting touch screen was much better for quickly deploying to get low or high shots. A screen that could do both would be badass!
The larger buffer of the R6 is really appreciated when shooting wildlife and really nice when shooting 20 FPS. When you couple a small buffer with a camera that takes a while to clear the buffer or locks you out of the menu, it is a problem....ala Sony.
I bought the Nikon z6 II, just because Ken Rockwell railed so hard against it. It's been really great. But I did get a bad 35mm with a stuck aperture right out of the box, whoops
@@FabledFew Ken's a good guy. I might not always agree with his choices, but he's given a lot to our community and I'm happy he found his way to TH-cam.
@@plasma800 It was his TH-cam that made me think twice about him. Calling anything that he personally doesn't use "B-tier" and some of his "American made baby!" antics are hard to tolerate.
@@plasma800 His photos are crap. I would only trust someone who knows how to take decent photos when it comes to reviewing gear. But maybe it's just me.
@@AntonisKorakakis you’re probably not alone. I prefer to not criticize where I can. But I can say that in viewing his images I know, based one what I’ve seen, we have entirely different perspectives on what and how we shoot. Also, how we edit and create in a computer, to which he’s self proclaimed dislikes preferring jpgs straight from camera. Can’t fault him too much for that line of thinking. But yes, I’ve heard others state that they don’t enjoy or get any artistic value from his images.
A lot of these types of videos highlight something that I feel has been true for quite awhile now: It's much harder to find a bad camera. Any of these cameras would be excellent for most scenarios. And if you need one for a very specific reason or feature then you're probably not needing to look at a video like this anyway. Brand wars are stupid and lazy. The criticisms are largely hollow and don't hold up to scrutiny. Oh, this line has a better evf? Who cares. Oh, they have a wider selection of lenses? How many lenses do you really need. That one can shoot at 1 billion ISO? If you're regularly in circumstances where you're shooting beyond, say, 6400 iso then you're looking for a more specialized camera anyway. It's a great time for photography/videography because there are so many great options out there. So how do you choose? Prices help, but the diff in prices isn't that great. I would say that you should get what you're friends and family have. If you know people who shoot Sony, get a Sony. Why? Because they're more likely to have gear that you can use. Someone might let you use one of their Sony lenses. Or even sell it to you for cheaper that you'd likely get at a store.
Hey Jared, congrats for your channel. Can I give you a suggestion? I speak Portuguese and my english is not so good. Some times it's difficult to understand what you say. Can you enable the legends (automatically generated by youtube) in your videos?
@@Super01041994 Sigma 24-70 2.8, Tamron 35 2.8, some cheap 14mm manual lens, still not sure why I bought it....it works ok and the kit lens which I rarely use.
Good comparison but don’t overlook the all-in cost with lenses. As you’ve often said “It’s all about the glass” so unless you have unlimited funds the options for e-mount glass will reduce your cost big time. Nikon/Canon glass is priced roughly 2.5 times more than Tamron/Sigma (Viltrox or Rokinon). Expect the a7IV to equal or leapfrog the Z6II/R6 within six months.
Good photographers anticipated the action...know your subject and put yourself in position to catch the moment. Photography is a lost art...technology has made everyone a photographer cause they can point a camera at a person and the camera catches the eye and then all you have to do is press the shutter and shoot off 20 rounds and pick the best of the bunch, crop, adjust exposure and show how awesome you are. I use new tech also but I still use my D3 and D700 from time to time. I no longer have a film camera.
@@marcusalanphotography694 I wish it were that easy. With birds, for example, you still have to know your subject, anticipate its action, and be in position to catch it. But being in position to catch the action and actually catching it are different things, especially when the subject is small and fast moving. Eye AF gives me one less thing to worry about. If you can't anticipate what your subject might do and be ready for it, all the tech in the world won't help.
@@JohnDrummondPhoto so there were no birds in flight photos before this. My point is the joy of photography used to be in the achievement of the work and knowledge you put in. Now all you do is aim and shoot. It is the equivalence now of fishing with and aggressive worm that attacks the fish for you. Where is the sport in that. Don’t get me wrong, I use the tech also but the greater joy and achievement comes from the work I do without all the assistance.
The need for a high capacity buffer may be not so critical for taking continually photos for tens of seconds like you take a movie but in those situations where the decisive moments in a long period of time are a few seconds apart in which the images are still being recorded in the card. In other words when the interval between the bursts is not big enough.
Totally agree with focusing - i have my R5 set to Eye AF, with the SET button custom set to pull focus to the centre of frame for the times the AF picks the wrong subject - between these two options there is rarely a time the shot will be missed, and many times it has got a moment that there was only an extremely small window to capture... as far as cards go the CFExpress cards are really nice - I had to take 140 GB to a client, as they were nearby, the transfer only took about 3 minutes over CFexpress / USB C
Maaaaan. I’m basically invested in the Nikon ecosystem, so maybe I’ll hold off on going mirrorless. I’ll stick to my D700 and D500. I was hoping to get a mirrorless Nikon to travel light and I’ve already got Nikon glass so going canon would be a pain lol
It reminds me reading comparison reports of cars in Germany between Mercedes, BMW and Audi. There is always a winner but at the end of the day it comes down to personal preferences as the differences are minor as they all build very good cars, respectively very good cameras in this case!
I have a Nikon D5 for shooting professional sports. I switched from a D850 to a Z7 for studio work and I love every moment. I wish Jared would have included the Z7 ii in this comparison. The low-light capability and the file size far exceeds the other cameras. I’m not sure if there are enough changes to upgrade from Z7 but from watching this video, I’m sticking with Nikon. I think Jared is sometimes biased against Nikon and to be fair, if you’re going to do reviews you’re supposed to be open to everything.
I had to buy new camera last time and here are prices of Nikon and Canon in my country: Canon R6: 12290PLN (~3353,56USD) Nikon Z6II: 9099PLN (~2482,84USD) On BF I find additional discount for Nikon and finally I paid 8099PLN (~2209,97USD) Difference - 3191PLN/4191PLN (~870,73USD/1143,59USD) This is quite huge difference in my opinion. I also wanted 50mm lens at start, so here are options (adapted lenses are not an option for me): Canon 50 1.2: 10990PLN (~2998,83USD) Nikon 50. 1.8: 2050PLN (~559,38USD) On BF I bought this Nikon 50 1.8 for 1770PLN (~482,98USD) For sure Canon R6 is better in some aspects than Nikon Z6II - but 870USD (or 1150USD in my case) is not worth those additional benefits IMO. I already tested Nikon Z 50 1.8 and this glass is fantastic and perfectly sharp. I guess Canon RF 50 1.2 would be even better but IMO it will not be 2400UDS better :) The situation will look different when we will consider F and EF lenses with adapters, but I did not considered such option. IMO Canon is for PROs who can afford to spend a lot of money, Nikon is for the ones who wants something best in terms of performance/price. Please notice lots of 'IMO' because this is only my opinion :)
I think so, just bought new A7III a month ago and when I was watching old guides from Tony, Manny and others the focusing was behaving differently and it was necessary to have dedicated button. Now the camera focuses on eye automatically at least for me :D
I have mine setup so when I’m focusing and I have eye tracking on it’ll default to tracking the eye when half pressing the shutter, if it doesn’t see the eye I’ll use my eye autofocus button (I use the AF-ON button) if I want it to search harder for an eye
To anyone complaining that we shouldn’t be putting the a7 III in this comparison, let me ask, why not? It’s the current model in the price range that compares to the other two. So yea, that’s why it’s here. Not to mention it’s still a fantastic option and one of the, if not the most revolutionary mirrorless camera ever. So when they release the 4, we will we do this video once again.
gr8 work sir always love ur reviews and comparisons
Absolutely! Was looking for my first full frame camera and wanted to go mirrorless. I decided to go with A7 III because the glass is cheaper. I also got my first real glass (Sigma 85mm 1.4 DN DG). Comparable system in Nikon or Canon would be much pricier.
The A7III also has always-on eye tracking right now.
I would have also used the argument, that the A7iii is the standard that the other 2 cameras were based to meet or exceed.
Think fact a7iii is still holding up in such a comparison speaks volumes.
The answer? Any one of them. If you can't get great results from a modern $2,000+ camera, the problem isn't the camera, its you. It's the photographer that counts.
Very true!
EXACTLY
This is so cliche I don't think my eyes are ever going to roll back into place
@@chrisogrady28 Stop liking your own comments
Nothing but true
Such a testament to the Sony A7iii that it can still hang with the latest models. Great camera and all you Canon & Nikon guys can really thank Sony for giving the market the huge shake up it needed.
Not really, I prefer SLR but I think Canon and Nikon will not invest anymore in this techno and are going 100% mirorless. Am a photo guy, not a video guy, SLR fulfill my need at a lower price tag (both body and lenses...)
The final answer is personal preference, budget, and exactly what are you shooting. They are all worthy cameras.
You're being too specific here. ha ha
What if I want a great camera with good autofocus and great LCD screen at a decent price?
yeah but still nikon
Or lens options. Sony is your best bet in this regard.
@K J M all of that plus no need for an adapter=Sony
Damn, that the 3 year old a7iii holds up against them is pretty awesome
Nikon using the same sensor than A7III
@@felixlechat1780 sony sensor used 3 company ..
So many people looking for confirmation that they bought the best camera. If it does what you need it to do, then it is the right camera for you. I still use a Nikon D200 I bought around 2008.
This! I'm still using a Sony a7 mark 1 but it still does the job. I am looking to upgrade though, since the screen has got some dead pixels now and I'm having some other hardware issues, and think the Canon R6 is best for me. But like I said in another comment, you wouldn't be disappointed with any of these cameras, especially if you choose based on which system you're most comfortable with!
hah yeah i just recently swaped my EOS D60 ive been using for so so long with a 80D, it can still kick out a great image with a bit of work but you can see when it suffers
Nikon d7000))))
I used a D200 for many years, eventually upgraded to a D800 then D850 because I needed the resolution, but the D200 was an absolute beast. Pure workhorse, over a million frames on it never once missed a beat. It was dropped on rocks, knocked about daily, doused in saltwater, caught in a sandstorm and all the surfaces were worn down mirror smooth, but it never failed me once. I still have it and it still works just fine.
Have had my a7iii over a year now and I don’t regret it. As a beginner hobbyist it’s probably too much camera, but I just love it and always have a blast taking photos plus it doubles as a great video camera for family events. Highly recommend it.
Nikon Z6 II.
Because I have Nikon mount lenses and it is good enough.
Same here. All of my glasses are F-mount. I've been eyeing on this camera for a while, and I'll be upgrading to it in about 3 years.
Same
So true . I shoot Canon and have a ton of EF glass . If I had to get a new camera tomorrow , for me it would be the R6.
@@legionator there is a Canon adapter for the Z series that gives full AF and data, which is better than its own Ftz. So you can use canon lenses on the nikon
@@CB-nd9ki Uh did you mean to reply to the poster above you?
Was able to cover multiple events no problem with the original z6, but I welcome the updated AF performance with the z6ii as it's made my shooting experience a lot better in low-light. Considering that I did tons of events from the D7000, to the D750, the z6ii is a real winner!
That's really good to hear. I shoot with the D750 now and I'd love to stay with Nikon to use my lenses but reviews like these really make it hard.
Why is the Canon and Sony considered better than the Nikon? I can't understand what the difference is?
@@Ritalie The camera industry is moving towards mirrorless systems and Nikon stayed on the DSLR ship till it sank… So technological aspects compared to the other 2 are "behind" in a sense. I'm going to stick with Nikon though because that just means they have guides and references as they develop their technology. Just my opinion.
I used a D7000 for a decade, but my R6 is coming tomorrow
I have the A7 III since it first came out, and I switched from D800e. Three years later it's so awesome that Nikon/Canon just caught up. I can't wait to see what Sony does with A7 IV
I can! I just got the a7iii 6 months ago and realllllly dont wanna spend 3-4k on a new camera XD especially after i just got the sony g master 70-200 f2.8. my wallet will die.
@@caseymanbrodude7846 😯 that lens is a beast
@@chris-mj8792 it was 1000% worth the price. dear god it was hard to save money for it though.
A7III is still a beast after 10years from now and so on ..
Absolutely
No!!! A7iv and A7v will be
@@AmitabhJangra value for money is also a thing, and just sit down you ain't affording any of those either. Edit- 😆😆
@@adityapartap How can you say without knowing me that I am not affording these cameras. You! Sit down with your narrow minded thinking.
@@AmitabhJangra I have used them, and on the basis of that you cannot say this, the a7iii is on a level higher than the flagship 5d iv. You can't just make a judgement based on how much something costs.
Jared you help people during this COVID situation. You help ease our minds with something interesting, positive, and creative. Mind health is important. Thank you FroBro
I love the sound DSLRs make. It is the photography equivalent of hearing a V8 engine. The old SLRs with a motor drive were even better.
Best cross-review on TH-cam (maybe in the world) at the moment. Very informative, structured, funny and upbeat. Keep it up Jared!
I preordered the r6 and haven’t had a single regret. It’s fantastic, I’m a canon shooter so I can easily pop my old lenses on.
I have to say, everything I see points me towards a Sony or Canon, but I’m not sure what it is, I just like the Nikon more and I’m not sure if I’d be happy with anything else
Z6/Z6ii is more than usable for many people. And tbh, R6 is the most expensive, so it should have better spec. After all is a mini-1DX
Love my Nikon z6 and getting z7 II soon 🥰
The Sony a7iii is on sale for $1798 right now body only. I was able to get it new (relative in the sense it had no shutter count) for $1600. The canon is at $2499 still body only. Going to try an adapter to use my friends really nice Nikon glass soon including a a vintage film one.
I am thinking the same way. I am a Nikon shooter wanting to go full frame from D500 & 7200. Almost bought the D850, but it looks like mirrorless is the way to go. Usability weighs heavy against the Sony for me but the specs and lenses are there. If I go mirrorless, I will be changing mounts either way I go. It's a tough decision. I may buy the original Z7 or the new Z6ii to replace my D7200 with the hope that Nikon catches up with a Z wildlife camera in the future. I am really hoping Nikon does something special with their long lenses. I think a lightweight 600pf will fit nicely in the Nikon lineup and the competition. I think people would buy the Z bodies to take advantage of the lenses.
Thank you Jared for putting this together. Usability is tough to gage and highly personal but a few sample comparisons might be beneficial. Switch from stills to video and back, programing buttons, switch in and out of tracking mode, waking up from sleep mode might be comparable features.
Exact same thought.
The fact that the 3 year old camera is still holding up to the brand new cameras is impressive. Wait until Sony releases the A7IV we'll see who wins then.
@@richardgorski23 Agreed on the menus and handling. I've been thinking about getting a Z6 II but if Sony fixes those two issues that you mentioned, I'm seriously going to consider switching over from Nikon to Sony.
@@richardgorski23 I have the sony a7iii and I love it. The menus get confusing but just like anything you just adapt.
I stayed because zeiss glass is God tier.
I mean, honestly any 3 yr old camera is still performing very well these days. New features and advancnts are always being made, but the tech is mature enough that the capability is pretty high across the board.
I upgraded to the Canon R6 I love it. Couple different reasons because of three different wheels that makes it easy to change Shutter speed, Fstop & iso recommend anybody the camera.
Emm, Sony and Canon are pretty good, so I choose Nikon.
Had the A7III for two years and now R6 for four months. R6 is my favorite camera so far. The colors are amazing!
But price ....
Good to know as I'm looking to buy either one of them. Making a choice is so hard when you can't hold them... I live in a very small town and I have to buy the camera online 😭
In India Z6 price is lower as compared to Sony.
I am also confused as hell
Ryan ufc, bro how about the autofocus perfomance and color in sony a7iii?
Nikon. Best color. Best video options. Amazing updated AF. Best future outlook now that Sigma and Tamron announced they are making Z lenses. Forgot to mention 12-bit ProRes on Nikon.
Where did you see Sigma and Tamron say they were making Z-Mount lenses?
Love Jared, watched all reviews for cameras and lenses, still bought the nikon zll, best ergonomics, best lenses, best interface, great autofocus, yeah I said it, GREAT AUTOFOCUS!
Alex, I’m with you 100%. I’ve watched all of Jared’s reviews, and even had the R6 ordered. At the last moment, my final takeaway from Jared was that even though he pushes hard for Canon, that he still strongly supports and shows love for Nikon and their superb image quality. I called and chanced my order to the Z6 II, and have never looked back.
Damn, I am still waiting for Nikon to ship mine! Enjoy yours!!
@@thetechiephotographer thanks
and amazing subject tracking feature, i love z6-ii.
Selling my canon R6 for the Sony a7iii with the 200-600g lens. So much value with Sony so stoked!
Havent heard anyone go backwards
Usually say a7iii to r6
Maybe R6 to A9
@@danbaxter7211 I returned my a7iii Lol AF is horrible blurry photos. The R6 Ant eye AF is just amazing.
Thanks for saying some nice things about Nikon and giving them a tick or two. We Nikon users appreciate it.
No we don't and why would we care about what he thinks anyway?
As a former Nikon shooter I wish there were more nice things that could be said about Nikon. Unfortunately it seems likely that having mostly caught up to what the three year old A7III can do Sony will release the A7IV and then Nikon (and probably Canon) will be playing catch-up again.
It's also incredible to have high quality 3rd party glass available that uses officially licensed protocols! Nikon and Canon still haven't learned that lesson.
@@IanHobday just get a d850 and be better than any mirrorless crap.
@@DB-sd3cw Cameras with mirrors are dead technology. There are real advantages to mirrorless such as the sensor being closer to the lens and being able to see *exactly* what the camera will capture though the viewfinder. People will continue to cling to DSLRs for a while but there is no future for that tech.
@@IanHobday so get a d850 and not worry about the future.
I get my R6 in two days. So happy!
Did you like it? Are you happy with it? Any problems so far?
@@carolinarubio4227 Very happy and no problems 👍
Moving from DSLR, I was choosing between Canon R6 and Sony a7Riii. Ended up going with Canon, mostly due to ergonomics and overall feel. Can't go wrong with any system.
This is the problem I'm having, I shoot a D500 but honestly I prefer the ergos on the R6 vs the Z6, I think I will go to canon when I do upgrade.
@@jdam28k did you try using both these cameras? Go to a camera store and try using them. Pick whichever feels good in your hands. What I implying is that do not decide on ergonomics just by looking at their images on screen.
@@nightfury4756 yeah I did, hence my comment, I still prefer the r6 for ergos, not to say the z6 is bad at all, quite the opposite, I just don’t think they are as good as the dslr counterparts or the Canons currently.
15:22 eye af activates with half pressing on the a7 iii with firmware v3
do it have the update colour science that is on the 7C
@@TheSocialjerry no it does not
Thanks for this comparison. I went with an R6, but any of these three cameras are fantastic and you simply can't go wrong with any of them.
DPReview shows Z6II has better Low light performance than R6
Actually not!
DPReview is wrong, you’re welcome.
It really depends on test conditions, camera settings, and the photographer. Even the best makes mistakes at some point in time.
@@ramonarias1234 yes, DPReview is wrong, you linking me DPReview doesn’t make it right....
@@FishinMagik They are wrong, and the noise came into the sample picture of the canon by mistake. right
Dude, this is literally what I'm in the market for. Stop reading my mind please. Thanks
17:14 - learned photography on manual film cameras... But every time someone says they prefer manual focus to me, I think to myself "you probably also prefer using an outhouse"
The videos that you made with the z6 on the studio was better, the skin tone that you had looked like art, i have to say i was amazed by the set up, now you look much more pale...
I felt so too.
That’s the biggest regret I have switching z6 -> r5. The skin tone is not as good in video and when I do zoom, I lost that movie-like dreamy feel people had commented on my z6 setup. Yes, I am very serious about my zoom meetings and use my mirrorless setup as much for zoom as for photography.
th-cam.com/video/DAGH2lCbphw/w-d-xo.html
I will still go with Nikon. The RAW files are just awesome
The Nikon RAW files can't save you from taking a bad selfie with those panda eyes. If you don't learn to see the light it doesn't matter what is in your hands you may as well have a phone!...
@@returntohome330 the fuck you bashing him for...
@@returntohome330 holly molly man, chill 😂😂
@@enzymesX Not bashing just giving an example of why Professionals can use any current camera but amateurs don't see why their images stink!.
@@amiraligol I did more to help him with my comment than hurt him. If he & you by the sounds of it can't handle criticism photography is not for you pick an easier profession!.
I don't own any Nikon glass, but I think it's worth mentioning that if you buy the Z6 ii from B&H photo right now, you can get an F-to-Z mount adapator for just $50. So if you were already a Nikon owner, you can keep using for F glass with about the same level of (in)convenience as the Canon users adapting their EF mount lenses on R bodies.
Upgraded to the Z6ii, very happy so far with how it performs and thankfully the dude that bought my Z6 off of me was willing to let me keep the Nikon battery and give him the 4 3rd party batteries that I had (because they weren't compatible with the Z6ii)
I enjoyed the video, as always! I appreciate all the background work you put into making these videos. I’d love to see a comparison between the high-res models (the Sony a7riv vs. Canon R5 vs. Nikon Z7ii). Or a revamped comparison between Sony cameras (maybe once the a7iv is released).
You know Sony did a good job if a camera is relevant 3 years later.
Yeah, no kidding.
Yeah also cause there’s no a74 to compare to.. 🤷🏻♂️
Yup
bullshit. it was outdated when it came out.
@@Juventinos outdated when it came out? I could start arguing, but I would just like to know why you think that
Regarding E-mount lenses ..
Not only the 3rd party native lenses but since you already mentioned Canon's own first party adapter ... you forgot to mention that both Nikon and Sony have these two for their respective F and A mount glass as well.
And with the E-mount you also get the 3rd-party adapters for just about everything including vintage Leica glass on mounts like M42 up to even Canon EF glass (and this with full AF capabilities and minimal drawbacks).
Sure, Canon's adapter may be more seamless and less confusing or limited than the other two systems but at least it's worth the mention that the other systems also have their own equivalents; and with Sony you even get a much wider selection of lenses AND mounts/adapters to choose from.
Thanks for your valued insight into these 3 cameras. I've been shooting Canon since I got my first Canon AE-1 Program in 1979. I've got several pieces of Canon and 3rd party glass for Canon which would make it very expensive for me to switch from Canon (which is why I was interested in watching this video). And, considering all of the specs and features of the R6 vs the other 2 bodies, it seems the additional $500 (over the Nikon) will be worth my investment (since I also won't be forced to buy a whole new inventory of lenses). Thanks, again for your valued analysis.
Best comparison video I’ve seen you do to be honest, a lot of good points made!
15:10 Eye AF working with shutter button halfway down on latest firmware!)) Always update your firmware on Sony, always!)
Is the latest firmware still 3.10?
It works from fw 3.0, but yeah, latest is 3.10.
Your explanaing skills are awesome + the decoration + lighting
I just bought A7iii and loving it. Need a better zoom lenses 28-200 or 70-300 just can't decide. More lining into Tamron 28-200
Your review failed to mention Nikon’s equivalent ZTF adaptor opening up the Z cameras access to Huge library of both Nikon and 3rd party lenses. I don’t deny Canon may have technical superior features, but the Canon’s price puts it out of my budget... the Z6II lets me do everything I need of it at a price I can afford
But that adaptor won't let you autofocus with the screwdrive lenses.
I’m not familiar with screw drive lenses? Are they popular?
@@irutgers Yes. There are many really good screw drive lenses, and they are much cheaper. Btw, some of them don't have a modern equivalent, like 180 mm 2.8D lens.
@@TheFemtos How does this, or does this, relate to the new Canon and Sony cameras .. do they have adaptor issues for screw mount lenses?
@@irutgers No, Canon and Sony cameras never had in-body autofocus motors. So, there are no such lenses in their systems. Btw, Nikon F-mount is very old, it was introduced in 1958.
Damn. Never been more tempted to go with the Canon, even though I've been leaning toward Sony because of their awesome third party lens choices. I'm already a Canon shooter, so the R6 may just 'feel' right. Comparing menu systems/interfaces could have helped.
Go Sony, you can buy cheaper but awesome lenses from Tamron&Sigma. Why waste money on going Canon/Nikon when there is a better option
@@mwkoala yea the sigma 85mm and the Tamron 70-180 look pretty great
I chose Sony and have no regrets and the bonus is the massive selection of really good and great lenses, mostly at very sensible prices.
Use a zeiss lens and then laugh at canon and nikon fan boys.
One thing you missed Jared, how the camera's switch back and forth from photo to video. The Nikon does this really well. As a hybrid shooter this is so important.
According to Taylor Jackson who liked the R6 he said he wouldn't use it for this because it doesn't save all the settings automatically like Nikons do.
Yeah I was going to say, the Nikon should be given the win in the segment due to RAW video, best switching ability for hybrid use, and lack of overheating issues that the Canon has.
What? The R6 saves settings for hybrid use, just like the R5 and even the EOS R does.
@@headman9999 it doesn't save your last settings see Taylor Jackson's review he explains it better than me.
Picked up a Nikon z6ii a few months ago as an upgrade from my Nikon D610 DSLR. Really loved all of the neat mirrorless features, and thought the autofocus was pretty good …
… until I realized it wasn’t. I tried recording selfie-style video with AF-F and the z6ii constantly, stubbornly would stay stuck on the background. I’d jump around, wave my hands in front like a madman, but if there was something the camera found compelling in the background, it would just. Not. Let. Go. Frustrating.
So now I’m waiting on a delivery of a Canon R6, and taking photos of my Z gear to sell it on eBay. I’m a bit sad. I really wanted to love the z6ii. I really did. But it just couldn’t do even the most basic things I needed it to do.
The fact that the a7iii is being compared to two cameras that came out in the last three months means that it already won!
That, plus the fact that it is EXTREMELY future proof. Glass is expensive so its great there are cheaper options via 3rd parties, and all of the a7 and a9 cameras use the same mount so its a smooth transition to the next Sony body 5-10 years from now. Personally, i feel like that is the most important as a semi-pro photographer.
If you are a beginner and want a full frame mirror less camera that is good for video and photography the A7 III is not the best but it is damn good even in 2020. The inexpensive body, inexpensive SD cards and inexpensive 3rd party lenses make it the best bang for the buck hands down!
Great vid Jared.. i was hoping for something like a conclusion graph or check boxes, something like that at the end but its still a good vid..
The Canon R6 also shoots 120fps at 1080p. It wasn't listed on the spec chart, but will do it. (Without audio.)
They added eye-AF with the shutter pressed halfway on the A7iii like 1 year ago.
exactly what i was going to comment. It was added by firmware update together with the animal EYE-AF
@@havoc23 he clearly didn't check before making videos
Canon most likely paid him to shit on the others lol
I wouldn’t go as far as saying he got paid or anything, but I’m just stating the fact that it does have it lol
@@maxmeunier8773 There’s a slight chance he got a nice little check from them before and or after this video was made lol you’ll never know!
One thing that bothers me when people (not only you Jared) analyze the mount in the cameras is that they do so solely from the perspective of lens availability and lens price. The Z mount, being larger, allows for better quality images regardless of the lens, since it allows for more light to get into the camera and all the lens elements are closer to the sensor (shorter path length) than in all the other cameras.
Great video... lens affordability is a huge factor with these systems. Used EF (with the outstanding Canon adaptor with ring controller), and 3rd Party Sony offerings for me personally make Canon and Sony the more attractive options. I think the A7IV will put the money ball squarely back in Sony's court (with Tammy glass it's the most economic option as well). 30 mp with 12 fps is my sweet spot.
I own the A7iii and it’s still awesome 2 years later. Based on price, the Sony or Nikon are the best bets looking at it.
Nice comparison as always Jared! It's been a while since I've visited your channel and glad I had this on while I'm editing today. I've got the full Z-series now, but I still enjoy knowing a little about each of the models you've featured here in this video. I'm locked in on the Z7 II and enjoying the new lineup of lenses. I wish you all the best throughout 2021! :)
16:10 you made a mistake when you said Nikon allows you to touch and drag focus on screen. You meant Canon and Sony, not Nikon an Sony. You can’t drag focus on Nikon.
It's the closest this channel has ever come to finally recognizing that Nikon Z6ii is also a competent Camera...nice review though 👍
Getting back into photography after a decade hiatus. Have a D70 and love it, but want to do more. Was looking a Nikon only. After this comparison, I'm seriously looking at Canon. Thanks for making this.
OMG, NO SNIFF TEST ? how can I make a decision what to buy without a sniff test. BTW Jared Happy Hanukkah my Hebrew brother
If you plan to crop your pictures at any time (and you will), choose the camera with the most megapixels, hands down
I dunno about the lens check mark, Fro. True that, Sony has a selection of third party lenses. But, Canon has the least expensive native glass!
I dunno about the EVF check mark, Fro. The biggest complaint with mirrorless cameras is EVF blackout during continuous shooting. The Canon has no blackout compared to other two bodies.
Blackout and viewfinder lag would be an excellent thing to see compared.
As a Nikon D850 owner who just recently bought Sony a7III, I'm in love with the Sony already.
Are you using an adaptor for. Glass?
@@jaymontez78 not yet as I haven't found one in my area. I'm now using Sigma 85mm f1.4 new version lens though it has some distortion issue can be fixed in post. I'm thinking to pick 24 70 sigma or 28 75 tamron in this year.
Have you had overheating issues with the Canon R5 or R6?
Hey Jared. Im the infamous "is 20MP enough to blow up when I need to crop?" guy. THANKS FOR MAKING THIS!!!
I couldnt wait - upgraded from D750 only 6 months after buying it to the R6 last month based on two comments you made: (Re: Eye-AF) "Getting shots I otherwise wouldve missed." BYE NIKON. And (Re: Sony) - not comfortable to hold. Eye-AF what a world of difference. True next gen stuff. Like a car vs a horse, full stop. How can you even consider Nikon without Eye-AF?? Shameful.
R6 is so good I almost feel like I havent earned the shots Im getting. Like bright clear photos in the dark no flash while actively chasing a baby. Lotta stabilization helping me out.
Only caveat - Im a newbie and almost returned the R6 until I realized I bought the absolute garbage variable aperture lens. Canon makes the 24-105 in F4-6.1 (variable, kill yourself) and F4 (fixed). Wonder how many newbies will buy the variable lens unknowingly and accept bad photos or return the camera. Cant wait to buy some RF glass. Jared would be cool for you to do a video comparing the costs and benefits of RF vs EF glass. Probably some great deals out there for EF glass now.
And had to update the EVF to max frame rate on the R6. At lower frame rate the EVF is unimpressive, painful if you are switch from an OVF.
Vari angle touchscreen on the R6 is cool for tripod remote trigger group portraits. But painstaking for shooting kids. Tilting touch screen was much better for quickly deploying to get low or high shots. A screen that could do both would be badass!
The larger buffer of the R6 is really appreciated when shooting wildlife and really nice when shooting 20 FPS. When you couple a small buffer with a camera that takes a while to clear the buffer or locks you out of the menu, it is a problem....ala Sony.
Love this channel and its in depth reviews on so many systems in this and other videos from the past!
I bought the Nikon z6 II, just because Ken Rockwell railed so hard against it. It's been really great. But I did get a bad 35mm with a stuck aperture right out of the box, whoops
Ken's starting to sound even more and more out of touch these days.
@@FabledFew Ken's a good guy. I might not always agree with his choices, but he's given a lot to our community and I'm happy he found his way to TH-cam.
@@plasma800 It was his TH-cam that made me think twice about him. Calling anything that he personally doesn't use "B-tier" and some of his "American made baby!" antics are hard to tolerate.
@@plasma800 His photos are crap. I would only trust someone who knows how to take decent photos when it comes to reviewing gear. But maybe it's just me.
@@AntonisKorakakis you’re probably not alone. I prefer to not criticize where I can. But I can say that in viewing his images I know, based one what I’ve seen, we have entirely different perspectives on what and how we shoot. Also, how we edit and create in a computer, to which he’s self proclaimed dislikes preferring jpgs straight from camera. Can’t fault him too much for that line of thinking. But yes, I’ve heard others state that they don’t enjoy or get any artistic value from his images.
Thnx alot for the info - u helped me decide to stick with canon. thnx again.
I voted with my wallet. So, it's Nikon Z6 II for me, thanks. Have a happy life folks
Cheers! Likewise 👍
Have the original Z6, still looking is it worth the upgrade
@@Narmi804 wait for next year for the high end cameras of nikon 🙏
if Sony on sale I would go for it.
Loving mine
I absolutely love your hair. Thanks for the video!
I think it all comes to what you like to shoot. Personally I like Nikon. Tried Sony and really did not like button placement.
Fantastic Presentation 👏👍 Great Job. Thank you
A lot of these types of videos highlight something that I feel has been true for quite awhile now: It's much harder to find a bad camera. Any of these cameras would be excellent for most scenarios. And if you need one for a very specific reason or feature then you're probably not needing to look at a video like this anyway. Brand wars are stupid and lazy. The criticisms are largely hollow and don't hold up to scrutiny. Oh, this line has a better evf? Who cares. Oh, they have a wider selection of lenses? How many lenses do you really need. That one can shoot at 1 billion ISO? If you're regularly in circumstances where you're shooting beyond, say, 6400 iso then you're looking for a more specialized camera anyway.
It's a great time for photography/videography because there are so many great options out there. So how do you choose? Prices help, but the diff in prices isn't that great. I would say that you should get what you're friends and family have. If you know people who shoot Sony, get a Sony. Why? Because they're more likely to have gear that you can use. Someone might let you use one of their Sony lenses. Or even sell it to you for cheaper that you'd likely get at a store.
Just bought a7iii and happy with it!
Indian price
Hey Jared, congrats for your channel. Can I give you a suggestion? I speak Portuguese and my english is not so good. Some times it's difficult to understand what you say. Can you enable the legends (automatically generated by youtube) in your videos?
Good to see my A7III is holding it's own after 3 years. Really looking forward to the A74 as I am invested in E Mount lenses now.
What lenses do you own?
@@Super01041994 Sigma 24-70 2.8, Tamron 35 2.8, some cheap 14mm manual lens, still not sure why I bought it....it works ok and the kit lens which I rarely use.
Do the Sony and Canon support hot-swappable batteries in the grip?
no
Good comparison but don’t overlook the all-in cost with lenses. As you’ve often said “It’s all about the glass” so unless you have unlimited funds the options for e-mount glass will reduce your cost big time. Nikon/Canon glass is priced roughly 2.5 times more than Tamron/Sigma (Viltrox or Rokinon). Expect the a7IV to equal or leapfrog the Z6II/R6 within six months.
"Oh, but what did we do back in the day when we didn't have that autofocus system?" Missed a lot of shots, probably. I know I did.
Good photographers anticipated the action...know your subject and put yourself in position to catch the moment. Photography is a lost art...technology has made everyone a photographer cause they can point a camera at a person and the camera catches the eye and then all you have to do is press the shutter and shoot off 20 rounds and pick the best of the bunch, crop, adjust exposure and show how awesome you are. I use new tech also but I still use my D3 and D700 from time to time. I no longer have a film camera.
@@marcusalanphotography694 I wish it were that easy. With birds, for example, you still have to know your subject, anticipate its action, and be in position to catch it. But being in position to catch the action and actually catching it are different things, especially when the subject is small and fast moving. Eye AF gives me one less thing to worry about. If you can't anticipate what your subject might do and be ready for it, all the tech in the world won't help.
@@JohnDrummondPhoto so there were no birds in flight photos before this. My point is the joy of photography used to be in the achievement of the work and knowledge you put in. Now all you do is aim and shoot. It is the equivalence now of fishing with and aggressive worm that attacks the fish for you. Where is the sport in that. Don’t get me wrong, I use the tech also but the greater joy and achievement comes from the work I do without all the assistance.
@@marcusalanphotography694 we'll agree to disagree, then. Cheers!
@@marcusalanphotography694 Heck, I have a pair of D700s that get heavy use!
The need for a high capacity buffer may be not so critical for taking continually photos for tens of seconds like you take a movie but in those situations where the decisive moments in a long period of time are a few seconds apart in which the images are still being recorded in the card. In other words when the interval between the bursts is not big enough.
What about the image quality test between these cameras ?? The most important test
depends on the lens so its more of a lens test
Totally agree with focusing - i have my R5 set to Eye AF, with the SET button custom set to pull focus to the centre of frame for the times the AF picks the wrong subject - between these two options there is rarely a time the shot will be missed, and many times it has got a moment that there was only an extremely small window to capture... as far as cards go the CFExpress cards are really nice - I had to take 140 GB to a client, as they were nearby, the transfer only took about 3 minutes over CFexpress / USB C
Eye af works on half press with a7iii. When they released their update for animal af.
I was just going to say the same! Jared- does that give the check mark to the Sony 😂.
YES! I've been waiting for this! more like this content Jared.
Now I'm even happier that I ordered an R6. Thanks!
Maaaaan. I’m basically invested in the Nikon ecosystem, so maybe I’ll hold off on going mirrorless. I’ll stick to my D700 and D500. I was hoping to get a mirrorless Nikon to travel light and I’ve already got Nikon glass so going canon would be a pain lol
Blackmagic raw will be available for the Nikon Z6 II which is great for video 👍🏻
The Nikon Expeed 6 processor is the same e processor found in the D6, which is a $6500 camera.
U didn't compare about the picture & video quality of these cameras.........?????
I thought that was strange too, but I’m honestly not surprised.
It reminds me reading comparison reports of cars in Germany between Mercedes, BMW and Audi. There is always a winner but at the end of the day it comes down to personal preferences as the differences are minor as they all build very good cars, respectively very good cameras in this case!
Final score sheet on screen would have been awesome now i have to rewatch the whole video to tally them up 😰
At least post it here for the rest of us haha
@@D4NVT hahaha true
You're very thorough and fun bro!
Thank you for a great review.
Why only wind tunnel ... You still missed the best test of them all
The sniff test
I have a Nikon D5 for shooting professional sports. I switched from a D850 to a Z7 for studio work and I love every moment. I wish Jared would have included the Z7 ii in this comparison. The low-light capability and the file size far exceeds the other cameras. I’m not sure if there are enough changes to upgrade from Z7 but from watching this video, I’m sticking with Nikon. I think Jared is sometimes biased against Nikon and to be fair, if you’re going to do reviews you’re supposed to be open to everything.
(About the sony) "I do want to let you know that I do still love this camera for what it did when it came out"
*me who still uses a d3100*
I had to buy new camera last time and here are prices of Nikon and Canon in my country:
Canon R6: 12290PLN (~3353,56USD)
Nikon Z6II: 9099PLN (~2482,84USD)
On BF I find additional discount for Nikon and finally I paid 8099PLN (~2209,97USD)
Difference - 3191PLN/4191PLN (~870,73USD/1143,59USD)
This is quite huge difference in my opinion.
I also wanted 50mm lens at start, so here are options (adapted lenses are not an option for me):
Canon 50 1.2: 10990PLN (~2998,83USD)
Nikon 50. 1.8: 2050PLN (~559,38USD)
On BF I bought this Nikon 50 1.8 for 1770PLN (~482,98USD)
For sure Canon R6 is better in some aspects than Nikon Z6II - but 870USD (or 1150USD in my case) is not worth those additional benefits IMO.
I already tested Nikon Z 50 1.8 and this glass is fantastic and perfectly sharp. I guess Canon RF 50 1.2 would be even better but IMO it will not be 2400UDS better :)
The situation will look different when we will consider F and EF lenses with adapters, but I did not considered such option.
IMO Canon is for PROs who can afford to spend a lot of money, Nikon is for the ones who wants something best in terms of performance/price.
Please notice lots of 'IMO' because this is only my opinion :)
Thought the always active eye AF was updated via firmware on the A7iii over a year ago? Or was that something else?
I think so, just bought new A7III a month ago and when I was watching old guides from Tony, Manny and others the focusing was behaving differently and it was necessary to have dedicated button. Now the camera focuses on eye automatically at least for me :D
I have mine setup so when I’m focusing and I have eye tracking on it’ll default to tracking the eye when half pressing the shutter, if it doesn’t see the eye I’ll use my eye autofocus button (I use the AF-ON button) if I want it to search harder for an eye
dunno if im running latest firmware but on mine you can turn it on and off in the menus
Yes it works with half press since firmware update.
Amazing comparation!!!