efkor
efkor
  • 32
  • 33 094
Timber Frame - Marcs Self Build: 01 Start
Marc gives a heads-up on this new series about how he extends and converts an ugly house in the Lake District
มุมมอง: 83

วีดีโอ

Doubts over appeal rejections in the Green Belt
มุมมอง 94ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I’m looking at 4 more properties in the Green Belt. As usual, I’m checking out decisions made by the Planning Appeal Inspectors. In every case, the householder is appealing against a condition applied by the Council that removed certain Permitted Development rights. 0.00 Intro 0:18 Case 1 1:14 Case 2 2:10 Case 3 4.46 Case 4 This is just one video of the 6-part "Removal of Permitt...
5 more successful appeals in the Green Belt
มุมมอง 43ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I’m looking at stand-alone properties in the Green Belt. As usual, I’m checking out decisions made by the Planning Appeal Inspectors. In every case, the householder is appealing against a condition applied by the Council that removed certain Permitted Development rights. 0.00 Intro 0:19 Case 1 2:22 Case 2 2:49 Case 3 3:51 Case 4 4.43 Case 5 This is just one video of the 6-part "R...
6 successful appeals in the Green Belt
มุมมอง 51ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I’m looking at houses that are located in clusters within the Green Belt. For many of these dwellings, the Council submitted that there was a special case for the protection of the character of the Green Belt. The uniform response of the Inspectors was that properties within the Green Belt had the same Permitted Development rights as those outside the Green Belt. 0.00 Intro 0:27 ...
2 out of 3 appeals succeed in National Parks
มุมมอง 22ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, we’re looking at 3 properties in the National Parks… two in the New Forest and one in the Peak District. In every case, the appeal is against a condition applied by the Council to remove certain Permitted Development rights. 0.00 Intro 0:20 Case 1 2:32 Case 2 3:59 Case 3 This is just one video of the 6-part "Removal of Permitted Development rights" series. Intellectual Property T...
PD rights restored in countryside locations
มุมมอง 72ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, we’re looking at 7 properties in the open countryside. These properties are not in the Green Belt or a Conservation area. In every case, the householder is appealing against a condition applied by the Council that removed certain Permitted Development rights. 0.00 Intro 0:19 Case 1 2:02 Case 2 2:51 Case 3 4:01 Case 4 5:10 Case 5 6:00 Case 6 7:30 Case 7 This is just one video of t...
6 suburban properties have PD rights restored
มุมมอง 34ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I'm looking at 6 properties in suburbia, checking out decisions made by the Planning Appeal Inspectors. In every case, the householder is appealing against a condition applied by the Council that removed certain Permitted Development rights. 0.00 Intro 0:17 Case 1 2:32 Case 2 3:47 Case 3 4:47 Case 4 5:28 Case 5 6:33 Case 6 This is just one video of the 6-part "Removal of Permitte...
Decisions on terraced properties ignore current usage
มุมมอง 85ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I look at appeal decisions concerned with terraced properties and the question of which side of the terrace is the Principal Elevation. In the cases reviewed, Inspectors make decisions on terraced properties that ignore current usage. 0.00 Intro 0:28 Project 1 2:03 Project 2 3:41 Project 3 5:16 Project 4 This is just one video of the 17-part "Principal Elevation" series that look...
Inspectors have no leeway to ignore minor infringements
มุมมอง 88ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I look at Appeal Decisions that follow the letter of the law. It doesn’t matter how tiny your wall or roof is. If it exists, it is subject to the planning laws. Consequently, Planning Inspectors have no leeway to ignore minor infringements of planning laws. 0.00 Intro 0:13 Project 1 1:52 Project 2 2:33 Project 3 3:10 Project 4 3:25 Project 4 3D This is just one video of the 17-pa...
Councils wrongly interpret "fronting a highway"
มุมมอง 79ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I look at appeal decisions that consider how a house fronts the highway. 0.00 Intro 0:06 Project 1 1:58 Project 2 4:16 Project 3 This is just one video of the 17-part "Principal Elevation" series that looks at Planning Appeal Decisions for Permitted Development householder applications. Intellectual Property The majority of photos included in this video are the intellectual prope...
Inspectors are failing to consider the "original" dwellinghouse
มุมมอง 50ปีที่แล้ว
This video looks at Appeal decisions that required the form of the original dwellinghouse to be identified. It is clear that Inspectors are failing to consider the "original" dwellinghouse. 0.00 Intro 0:08 Project 1 1:35 Project 2 3:03 Project 3 This is just one video of the 17-part "Principal Elevation" series that looks at Planning Appeal Decisions for Permitted Development householder applic...
4 Inspectors that disappoint with quality of assessments
มุมมอง 58ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I continue looking at appeal decisions where the original structure should be identified before applying the Principal Elevation limitations. I review 4 cases that disappoint with the quality of assessment performed by the Inspectors. 0.00 Intro 0:11 Project 1 2:44 Project 2 5:40 Project 3 7:24 Project 4 This is just one video of the 17-part "Principal Elevation" series that look...
Patchy assessment of candidate elevations is unacceptable
มุมมอง 35ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I look at planning appeals where the original form of the dwellinghouse needs to be identified. There is a repeated failure to identify the original dwellinghouse and the resulting patchy assessment of candidate elevations is unacceptable. 0.00 Intro 0:07 Project 1 1:38 Project 2 3:14 Project 3 This is just one video of the 17-part "Principal Elevation" series that looks at Plann...
Consideration of "original" house can go back centuries
มุมมอง 33ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I look at Appeal Decisions relevant to outbuildings, with specific regard to the limitation E.1(c): The proposed outbuilding cannot be built …. if any part …. would be situated on land forward of a wall forming the principal elevation of the original dwellinghouse. I look at how the qualifier “original” can make a big difference to the outcome. In the second case considered, I il...
Inspector is adamant that a garage door is a wall
มุมมอง 76ปีที่แล้ว
In this video, I look at appeal decisions relating to extensions under Class A of the PDO. There are 5 cases where the appellant wanted to extend forward beyond the PE. 0.00 Intro 0:36 Project 1 1:06 Project 2 1:36 Project 3 2.22 Project 4 2.48 Project 5 This is just one video of the 17-part "Principal Elevation" series that looks at Planning Appeal Decisions for Permitted Development household...
Planning Inspector fails to apply the correct test
มุมมอง 77ปีที่แล้ว
Planning Inspector fails to apply the correct test
Mixed results when deciding the Principal Elevation
มุมมอง 73ปีที่แล้ว
Mixed results when deciding the Principal Elevation
Inspectors confused when identifying Principal Elevation
มุมมอง 96ปีที่แล้ว
Inspectors confused when identifying Principal Elevation
Flawed logic on dormers for end-terraced house
มุมมอง 198ปีที่แล้ว
Flawed logic on dormers for end-terraced house
Council with a record number of identical appeals
มุมมอง 74ปีที่แล้ว
Council with a record number of identical appeals
I don't accept this Inspectors play on words
มุมมอง 35ปีที่แล้ว
I don't accept this Inspectors play on words
Inspector wrongly dismisses hip-to-gable conversion
มุมมอง 47ปีที่แล้ว
Inspector wrongly dismisses hip-to-gable conversion
6 hip-to-gable conversions are dismissed
มุมมอง 180ปีที่แล้ว
6 hip-to-gable conversions are dismissed
What is "beyond the plane of a roof slope"?
มุมมอง 193ปีที่แล้ว
What is "beyond the plane of a roof slope"?
10 Permitted Development conditions that apply to all Extensions
มุมมอง 3.1K2 ปีที่แล้ว
10 Permitted Development conditions that apply to all Extensions
Rules for building Side Extensions using Permitted Development
มุมมอง 4.5K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Rules for building Side Extensions using Permitted Development
Eligibility of your House for Permitted Development
มุมมอง 2.7K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Eligibility of your House for Permitted Development
Rules for building Loft Conversions using Permitted Development
มุมมอง 4.9K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Rules for building Loft Conversions using Permitted Development
Rules for building rear extensions under permitted development
มุมมอง 9K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Rules for building rear extensions under permitted development
Rules for adding Outbuildings using Permitted Development
มุมมอง 4.4K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Rules for adding Outbuildings using Permitted Development

ความคิดเห็น

  • @avishekghose3299
    @avishekghose3299 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Are there restrictions on new build homes, that are part of a development?

  • @bloolouis
    @bloolouis 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Exactly what I needed, thankyou

  • @brandenmuirhead8988
    @brandenmuirhead8988 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi, do you take on jobs? We could really use some advice.

  • @woodyunedited5669
    @woodyunedited5669 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great series on PD, I was looking and looking to understand if you can add storeys of attached single storey garage and you’ve explained it clearly, No lol. You’ve described leaving a small inclosed patio between rear and side extension to stay within PD rules. Can you advise how big the gap needs to be and could you externally bridge across on the first floor?

    • @efkor
      @efkor หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you liked it. I have seen a brick width approved on appeal. Bridging across at first floor level is not available with PD.

  • @Henry.Riccato-Smith
    @Henry.Riccato-Smith หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is absolutely critical of anyone considering building under PD! Thank you for uploading your thoughts and research. Valuable insights indeed.

    • @efkor
      @efkor หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your kind comment

  • @DarrylCaithness
    @DarrylCaithness 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the videos, they're great. I have a question though: In the video it says for outbuildings, the maxiumim height is 2.5 or 3M depending on proximity to boundary. However how does this work if you have a multi level garden? We have a 3m wide back garden, after which it drops away at almost 90° for 3.5m, then falls away at 45° for a further 3m in height before levelling out. Thus in total the bottom garden is 6.5m lower than the top garden. We would like to build a garden room half way down at the foot of the first 3.5m drop. The rear of the structure would sit on the ground at the base of the first 3.5m drop, and as the base projects forward would sit on ground screws at the front extending up to create a level platform. But whilst the rear of the structure could easily be within the limit, due to the downward pitch line of the garden, the front section would be higher off the ground directly below it because the ground is falling away at that point. Therefore my question is: in this scenario does the 2.5/3m maximum height requirement basically mean at no point can the structure be higher than 2.5/3m from the ground directly below it at all points of the structure? And is the height determined relative to the neighbour's land? I ask this secondary point to see whether it might be an option to build our ground up with gabions to create a level platform and the therefore stay within the limit relative to 'our' ground, but of course would be higher than the neighbours' ? Please bear in mind the top of the structure would still be lower than the ground floor of the house. Many thanks.

    • @efkor
      @efkor หลายเดือนก่อน

      As you have found, PD rules dont cover every scenario, especially where there is sloping land. And where one council might agree with your interpretation, another might not. Have you considered obtaining a Lawful Development Certificate? This costs just £100 and ensures you don’t accidentally build something outside your (council-interpreted) PD rights. As it proves your project was lawful at the point of construction, it also protects you if PD rules ever change.

    • @DarrylCaithness
      @DarrylCaithness หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@efkor Thanks so much for responding. It would appear then I'm at the mercy of their decisions, which I suspect would be quite strict as they recently refused permission on some very minor alterations my neighbour wanted to make. If they were to refuse, can one appeal PD decisions? Thanks again.

  • @GL_1975
    @GL_1975 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My neighbour is in the process of building a loft conversion dorma to the rear. The roof went on today and I've noticed it encroaches into my area. The houses are terraced and i received no party wall agreement. Any advice would be appreciated.

    • @efkor
      @efkor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Out of my remit. Its a legal matter

  • @BenMidland365
    @BenMidland365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very clear and interesting !!!

    • @efkor
      @efkor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you think so!

  • @user-zf9jw2ty6b
    @user-zf9jw2ty6b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your videos and very informative. Business next to me owns outbuilding in rear of my curtilage. Has access rights only - and share of path - opened business in outbuilding (grrrr). Council say no planing required. She is non-householder and non-resident and rents out the space. I’m an upper flat with 1 below. Confused about flats and permitted development

    • @efkor
      @efkor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats a very confused comment. Sounds like a legal problem not PD.

  • @mattcollins4322
    @mattcollins4322 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello I have a semi detached house with a 3m wide by 1m deep outside toilet attached to the back of original house line. This was build with the house. Does this then make this my start point of my 3m permitted after the toilet house? Would love an answer on this please?

    • @tphippo1375
      @tphippo1375 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes - you measure off the rear-most part of the original house - see the part of the video that covers 'stepped' rear elevations. But - it is not always great having stepped depth extensions. So, a useful tactic can be to 1st apply for a Certificate of lawful development, get that approved. Then use that to help support a Planning Application where you want to extend out further then PD limits. Some Local authorities might insist you actually build your PD extensions to take them into account for the purposes of a Planning Application, others might eb happy if you had purely commenced the PD work ( e.g. excavated foundations / poured concrete. Other Local Authorities might not make you do anything - it can vary alot!

    • @efkor
      @efkor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed

  • @melalismail9116
    @melalismail9116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for a very informative video. Please could you clarify if there's a previous 40 year old double storey (left) side extension that was equal in width to the original house and doubledthe size of the house, could you do a small lean-to extension ground floor only and 1.5 metres wide on the right side of the original house under permitted development?

    • @efkor
      @efkor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My feeling is that you run foul of the width restriction under PD rules. It might be worth asking for prior approval.

  • @connormcleod9595
    @connormcleod9595 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Legend ❤

    • @efkor
      @efkor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks :)

  • @AngieWardle-px2gs
    @AngieWardle-px2gs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. If the extension is on the rear of a semi-detached house, the eaves cannot be more than 3 meters because of the boundary. However could you have a 4 meter max height on the boundary with the roof sloping away from the boundary reducing to 3meters at the opposite side?

    • @efkor
      @efkor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats a negative

  • @stevetaylor1657
    @stevetaylor1657 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the information, please could you tell me the rules for this scenario, we have a searching for brick base, outbuilding which we would like to knock down and make into garden room. What are the rules on existing buildings?

    • @efkor
      @efkor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your PD allowance covers existing and proposed structures

  • @DJCairoMonroe
    @DJCairoMonroe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your videos are so helpful and clear! I am looking at a house which has had a corner extension in the 70s. This covers mostly the rear but also the side of the property. Can I add a rear extension which includes this? I want to merge it with the new extension ideally.

    • @efkor
      @efkor 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad it was helpful! You can merge the existing and proposed extensions but the total must comply vvith PD rules. Good luck!

  • @dtek1832
    @dtek1832 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Super clear thank you

    • @efkor
      @efkor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're welcome!

  • @ianweatherley45
    @ianweatherley45 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi I am working my way through your videos they are very good, a question on outbuildings if I build a garage at the end of my large garden 2.5 mtrs away from the boundary 2.5 to the eves 4mtr to the ridge can it only be a two sided pitch or can I make it L shaped building so a 90degree turn on the roof Many thanks Ian

    • @efkor
      @efkor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your comment. Theres no restriction on roof shape as long as you comply with all regs

  • @betterhomesstudio1194
    @betterhomesstudio1194 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best of luck! Will be following your journey!👏

    • @efkor
      @efkor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you. Next video coming soon!

  • @FirstLast-rh9jw
    @FirstLast-rh9jw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good luck. I''m from south lakes, originally and yes, house prices are mental. good luck with dealing with nimby neighbours, unhelpful councillors, rubbish tradesmen, overpriced contractors.... Millom., huh? Barrow in furness? frequent winner of the UK's crappest town award.

    • @efkor
      @efkor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your best wishes. I'll do my best to overcome the obstacles you mention!

  • @user-cu8pt3or4q
    @user-cu8pt3or4q 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can I put a two story extension right up to a parting wall

    • @user-cu8pt3or4q
      @user-cu8pt3or4q 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The parting wall is between my house and the next door

    • @efkor
      @efkor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry, not enough information. Suggest you find a local designer.

  • @sidperry7748
    @sidperry7748 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, can you please tell me if the roof lights " velux windows " on the side roofs have to be obscure glass or can they be clear glass ? Thanks.

    • @efkor
      @efkor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The question to ask is do they overlook your neighbour?

  • @user-ei1sf6cl2m
    @user-ei1sf6cl2m 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi there, thanks for the video. I am still struggling to find an answer about whether I need prior approval or planning. My 1930s semi currently has a long (6m) and narrow (2.5m) extension. I am looking at reducing the length to 4m but increasing width to 5m inline with the house. Can this be done under PD or is the maximum still 3m from original house? One neighbour has 6m extension and the other (the one I am attached to) has a 3m extension. Thanks in advance

    • @efkor
      @efkor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      3m is max unless you apply for the extension

  • @kevinallen9986
    @kevinallen9986 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great videos lots of info. I have a huge front facing dormer it's visually a total shocker. Can I remove it and put back a sloped roof thanks

    • @efkor
      @efkor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your comment. Unless you are in a listed house or in a conservation area, I see no reason why you cant remove the dormer

  • @user-kx8kp1uv6n
    @user-kx8kp1uv6n 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, Thanks for the information, i just want a bit more clarification on permitted development rights on detached house with stepped rear wall, can you extend each stepped rear wall by 8 meters ? Please let me know your thought on this Thank you

    • @efkor
      @efkor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, you can extend each (original) stepped wall by 6m under normal PD rules and this extends to 8m if you obtain Prior Approval. Hope this helps you

  • @garyfletcher7010
    @garyfletcher7010 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With Class E, for out buildings, PD defines the purpose as incidental to the enjoyment of the dwelling house. This also provides for domestic needs and enjoyment of the dwelling house, such as keeping pets, birds, bees and other wildlife. Would you agree that any outbuilding could NOT be used for the conduct of a home based business? For example, the harvesting and storage of Koi Carp for a commercial concern!

    • @efkor
      @efkor 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed

    • @garyfletcher7010
      @garyfletcher7010 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you. I was confident in my understanding of PD rules, it’s good to get a second opinion.

  • @aldozilli1293
    @aldozilli1293 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've looked through several PD videos and you've defo got the best shizzle on this tricky area.

    • @efkor
      @efkor 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, thanks!

  • @aldozilli1293
    @aldozilli1293 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is not wholly accurate. Valid PD is also applicable to flats and the right to rise.

    • @efkor
      @efkor 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      video was accurate at the time of production

  • @DilDilpakistan1947
    @DilDilpakistan1947 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please explain about L SHAPE DORMERS THANKS

    • @efkor
      @efkor 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not sure what you need

  • @KiaKamalKiya
    @KiaKamalKiya 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for yor efforts. I have a detatched house. I also propose to build a Garden Room to the back fence of the propety in compliance with size/distance rules. It will be approx 30sqM with 14ft depth. What's the maximum depth single story extension permissable under PD?

    • @efkor
      @efkor 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A garden room (assume detached) has different rules from extensions. You mention both types.

  • @DivineFeminine_01
    @DivineFeminine_01 ปีที่แล้ว

    I received a “Prior Approval Not Required” in April 2021, but I didn’t start the work at the time. Will I need to do it all again if I want to start now? Also, I received letters from surveyors for both my neighbours saying to inform them 2 months prior, is this the usual process? Thank you

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Different Prior Approval work has different timescales. Its unlikely that you have exceeded the allowable time but I would email the Council and ask. If the work impinges on the neighbouring boundaries, such an approach from surveyors is normal.

  • @gidstar
    @gidstar ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi! Thank you for this info. Quick question for you relating to the heights of permitted development. My neighbours rear ground level is slightly higher than mine (around 30cm) therefore on their side they want to build to 3m in height adjacent to our boundary however on my side the extension will be 3.3m in height. So do I have a good reason to object to the PD or will the planning officer measure it from my neighbours side? Interested to know..many thanks!

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Any difference in ground level will be taken into account

  • @drkarimatefi
    @drkarimatefi ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you advise please if a loft lift can be done under planning permission to create head space for loft conversion? thanks

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Happy to respond to PD queries

  • @craigb1232
    @craigb1232 ปีที่แล้ว

    i am taking down a carport on a detached house .i wish to build a single side extension the full side of the house and no higher than the permitted development .Can i do this under permitted development please

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      If you comply with all the rules for PD, not just the height, you will be OK. This includes an understanding of Principal Elevation and depends on such factors as whether you are on a corner location. If in doubt, check my other videos. If you're not sure, apply for LDC. Good luck

  • @MustakAhmed-ed6db
    @MustakAhmed-ed6db ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi my additonal storey application is on the verge of being refused as being out of character with rest of the street. Is there anything that can be done? My house is semi detatched

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Mustak, from what you say, you will need to amend the design. Councils are rejecting such applications unless the additional storey really fits in with the surrounding environment. Good luck

    • @MustakAhmed-ed6db
      @MustakAhmed-ed6db ปีที่แล้ว

      My design is the simplest that i can possibly do with matching materials included. The only thing that they don't like is that my house will be taller than my attatched neighbours' house and the rest of the street.

    • @MustakAhmed-ed6db
      @MustakAhmed-ed6db ปีที่แล้ว

      It complies with height restrictions and every other guideline.

  • @SilvertownSurveyors
    @SilvertownSurveyors ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video..thanks!

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it!

  • @paulkimberley5267
    @paulkimberley5267 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really enjoying the videos, thank you. Could I ask a question? I an wanting to put a one storey 3m extension on the back of a terraced house under PD. Are there any issues about how close to my neighbours property, or in effect can I just follow the brick line coming off the back of the house? many thanks

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Paul. Two issues to look out for. First make sure that your property retains PD rights (if not sure, email the council). Second, many (London) councils are rejecting such cases where the original house has a projecting rear porch or offshot (even a 1m depth) that contains a wall with a side elevation combined with the proposed extension being more than twice the width of the house. Look at Class A condition j (iii) very carefully!

    • @paulkimberley5267
      @paulkimberley5267 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@efkor Thank you I will. Nothing on the back of the house, but will double check with the council.

  • @jamesenglish812
    @jamesenglish812 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Marc. I have just come across your series of videos on PD rights which are excellent. I have one question:- does a conservatory come under the same rules as an extension?

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, glad you like them. Check out this info on conservatories ecab.planningportal.co.uk/uploads/miniguides/conservatories/Conservatory.pdf

  • @gwynmorris5852
    @gwynmorris5852 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant - clear and very helpful.

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @jonnybravo2463
    @jonnybravo2463 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi , I live in a semi detached property which already had a wrap around extension that had planning permission . Wanting to add an additional extension to the rear under p.d would this affect my rights to build ?

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Check that PD rights have not been removed by the Council, find out by reading the conditions attached to the PP

  • @kerioconnorful
    @kerioconnorful ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm enjoying your informative videos, very helpful. I'm curious to know if all PD rights do not apply if my house was built pre 1948? For context, our greenbelt bungalow was built in 1911. We've had planning refused for a first floor extension (above existing flat roof ground floor extension) so I'm looking at exploring PD rights.

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Keri, glad to hear the videos are helpful. The good news is that your 1911 bungalow will probably have PD rights. All PD requirements apply to the dwelling as it was originally built, or as it stood on 1st July 1948. Thats the relevance of the 1948 date

    • @kerioconnorful
      @kerioconnorful ปีที่แล้ว

      @@efkor ah thanks for your reply Marc! Yes your vids are very helpful and so well explained whilst remaining concise 😁 So if the single storey extension was added in 1975 with planning permission, am I within my rights to add the first floor extension to the existing single storey under PD?

  • @albertgraham9097
    @albertgraham9097 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi super video can you help me l'm having loads of grief with local planning I was given permitted development on a single story side extension on my corner plot bungalow then later applied for planning on a different extension and was advised by council to add the said side extension on the same application 22 weeks later they have passed it but made me reduce the size and insisting on a different material finish my question is can I go back to the original permitted development I was granted that I received on a email stating official document (I have no certificate of lawfulness) or does the planning decision override it thanks for your help

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      If you have a CLD for PD, this is your fallback position that you can adopt at any time, irrespective of any subsequent planning permission. If you have an email giving advice, this is not a CLD and cannot be relied upon. Hope this helps

    • @albertgraham9097
      @albertgraham9097 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi thanks for your super reply my property is fully white render but planning is insisting on building it in a red brick if I was to go along with it can I render it after completion and if so how long should I wait,this is what is written on the approval letter Materials. The external finishing materials shall match with those of the existing building, other than the extension to the south west as shown on plan 2266/05 B received 25 November 2022 which shall be constructed in red brick to match the existing. The extension shall not be painted or rendered without the written permitted of the local planning authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and to ensure a satisfactory form of development

  • @RM-fk8yc
    @RM-fk8yc ปีที่แล้ว

    there must be a point when common sense prevails over PD or planning rules, surely what neighbours say and what is aesthetic and improvement should be considered

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      PD is fairly prescriptive to allow householders to get on with boilerplate extensions. Planning decisions follow a mix of rules and guidelines. Planning Inspectors follow the law. Common sense is sometimes used to achieve an equitable result.

  • @RM-fk8yc
    @RM-fk8yc ปีที่แล้ว

    Great informative video. I have a question for you for my semi-detached , having created a dormer following PD rules (20cm eaves, no more than 50m3 roof space, etc) why is the council now asking for 100cm from eaves and 70cm from cheeks. one side cheek is from a double storey extension so no neighbour and is a hip roof

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you found the video useful. The council is probably asking for these non-PD details because they appear in the councils own design guide. Some councils are slavish regarding their guidelines. Best to comply if they are trivial to you.

    • @RM-fk8yc
      @RM-fk8yc ปีที่แล้ว

      @@efkor thanks for reply, Is the council desgin guides different from PD rules? Thought you need to give Article 4 instructions if council is to override Govt tech guidelines? Where do you find council design guide as their standard reply is follow "planning portal" which looks at Gove PD rules!

  • @garethjones8504
    @garethjones8504 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi, great content and very informative. a question please, I have purchased a semi with a large side single storey extension running full length (back to front) of the house. I am considering building up one storey but only half the width of the lower extension. is this PD? hope I've explained myself correctly. cheers

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately not

    • @aldozilli1293
      @aldozilli1293 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gareth you lazy herbert, only takes a little bit of time to know that from a little research, starting with this geezers videos.

  • @usmanhayat43
    @usmanhayat43 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative video. I would like if you could make an vidoe about pd rules about development over attached side garage.

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you like it. In response to your request, do check out my PD video series. Unfortunately, you will see that there are no PD rights for upper-storey side extensions

  • @muhammadishfaq3528
    @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

    If a council removes the permitted development rights or puts conditions on the development, is it possible to appeal against them after the appeal period has finished?

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      In those circumstances, you will need to make a new application to either restore PD rights or to remove the condition. If it fails, you can then appeal.

    • @muhammadishfaq3528
      @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@efkor thanks

  • @muhammadishfaq3528
    @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

    Eagerly waiting for next series. This series very much cleared the concept of principle elevation.

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. Hope you like the next series ...

  • @muhammadishfaq3528
    @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, thanks for sharing your planning experience and knowledge. Your elaboration is helping a lot of people. May I ask a question please in this regard? If a property fulfills all these requirements, there is no confusion, and all work is done according to building regulations through building control application and under council supervision and gets building regulations compliance certificate, is it still needed to have a certificate of lawful development?

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Under the circumstances you describe there can be 2 reasons to obtain an LDC. (1) You might think that your property fulfils all the PD rules but you can never be 100% sure. For example, if your property is on a corner, which elevation is the Principal Elevation? You need to know this if you want to build a "rear" extension or a dormer on the "rear" elevation. If you obtain an LDC, this is confirmed for you and you needn't worry about an enforcement notice (2) When you come to sell the property, the LDC gives the purchaser 100% peace of mind that the additions were added legally. It all depends on your appetite for risk and your knowledge of PD rules. I hope this helps

    • @muhammadishfaq3528
      @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@efkor thanks. Much appreciated

  • @muhammadishfaq3528
    @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I understand, from this video and some previous videos your made, is inspectors rarely disagree with Council's decision. Whether it is part of policy or other reasons, however it is not independent approach.

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe that the official figures say that 1 in 3 appeals are successful so it might be a little harsh to say that inspectors rarely disagree with Councils decision. You have to remember that I am very selective with the cases that I feature, choosing only those that make a good story!

    • @muhammadishfaq3528
      @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@efkor Thanks.

    • @whatsthisnow101
      @whatsthisnow101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seems very pedantic all this principle elevation, surely there has to be a less complicated and controversial way of doing it.

  • @muhammadishfaq3528
    @muhammadishfaq3528 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation of principle elevation when a building has more than one featured facades

    • @efkor
      @efkor ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. Glad you like it