4 Inspectors that disappoint with quality of assessments

In this video, I continue looking at appeal decisions where the original structure should be identified before applying the Principal Elevation limitations. I review 4 cases that disappoint with the quality of assessment performed by the Inspectors.
0.00 Intro
0:11 Project 1
2:44 Project 2
5:40 Project 3
7:24 Project 4
This is just one video of the 17-part "Principal Elevation" series that looks at Planning Appeal Decisions for Permitted Development householder applications.
Intellectual Property
The majority of photos included in this video are the intellectual property of Google and they are used here for educational purposes, promoting an improved understanding of architectural planning processes in England and Wales. All 3D images have been created by Marc Almond and copyright is owned by Marc Almond.
Marc and efkor
Marc is the founder of efkor and he is committed to providing planning services and information focussed on permitted development in England and Wales. You can find out more about Marc and efkor at:
www.efkor.co.uk
Facebook: / efkorplans
TH-cam: / @efkor
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.c...
Waterstones: www.waterstone...

[@muhammadishfaq3528]

What I understand, from this video and some previous videos your made, is inspectors rarely disagree with Council's decision. Whether it is part of policy or other reasons, however it is not independent approach.

[@efkor]

I believe that the official figures say that 1 in 3 appeals are successful so it might be a little harsh to say that inspectors rarely disagree with Councils decision. You have to remember that I am very selective with the cases that I feature, choosing only those that make a good story!

[@muhammadishfaq3528]

@@efkor Thanks.

[@whatsthisnow101]

Seems very pedantic all this principle elevation, surely there has to be a less complicated and controversial way of doing it.