ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Doubts over appeal rejections in the Green Belt

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2022
  • In this video, I’m looking at 4 more properties in the Green Belt.
    As usual, I’m checking out decisions made by the Planning Appeal Inspectors. In every case, the householder is appealing against a condition applied by the Council that removed certain Permitted Development rights.
    0.00 Intro
    0:18 Case 1
    1:14 Case 2
    2:10 Case 3
    4.46 Case 4
    This is just one video of the 6-part "Removal of Permitted Development rights" series.
    Intellectual Property
    The majority of photos included in this video are the intellectual property of Google and they are used here for educational purposes, promoting an improved understanding of architectural planning processes in England and Wales. All 3D images have been created by Marc Almond and copyright is owned by Marc Almond.
    Marc and efkor
    Marc is the founder of efkor and he is committed to providing planning services and information focussed on permitted development in England and Wales. You can find out more about Marc and efkor at:
    www.efkor.co.uk
    Facebook: / efkorplans
    TH-cam: / @efkor
    LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/marcalmon...
    Waterstones: www.waterstones.com/book/the-...

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @kerioconnorful
    @kerioconnorful ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm enjoying your informative videos, very helpful. I'm curious to know if all PD rights do not apply if my house was built pre 1948? For context, our greenbelt bungalow was built in 1911. We've had planning refused for a first floor extension (above existing flat roof ground floor extension) so I'm looking at exploring PD rights.

    • @efkor
      @efkor  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Keri, glad to hear the videos are helpful. The good news is that your 1911 bungalow will probably have PD rights. All PD requirements apply to the dwelling as it was originally built, or as it stood on 1st July 1948. Thats the relevance of the 1948 date

    • @kerioconnorful
      @kerioconnorful ปีที่แล้ว

      @@efkor ah thanks for your reply Marc! Yes your vids are very helpful and so well explained whilst remaining concise 😁 So if the single storey extension was added in 1975 with planning permission, am I within my rights to add the first floor extension to the existing single storey under PD?

  • @albertgraham9097
    @albertgraham9097 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi super video can you help me l'm having loads of grief with local planning I was given permitted development on a single story side extension on my corner plot bungalow then later applied for planning on a different extension and was advised by council to add the said side extension on the same application 22 weeks later they have passed it but made me reduce the size and insisting on a different material finish my question is can I go back to the original permitted development I was granted that I received on a email stating official document (I have no certificate of lawfulness) or does the planning decision override it thanks for your help

    • @efkor
      @efkor  ปีที่แล้ว

      If you have a CLD for PD, this is your fallback position that you can adopt at any time, irrespective of any subsequent planning permission. If you have an email giving advice, this is not a CLD and cannot be relied upon. Hope this helps

    • @albertgraham9097
      @albertgraham9097 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi thanks for your super reply my property is fully white render but planning is insisting on building it in a red brick if I was to go along with it can I render it after completion and if so how long should I wait,this is what is written on the approval letter
      Materials.
      The external finishing materials shall match with those of the existing building, other than the extension to the south west as shown on plan 2266/05 B received 25 November 2022 which shall be constructed in red brick to match the existing. The extension shall not be painted or rendered without the written permitted of the local planning authority.
      Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and to ensure a satisfactory form of development