วีดีโอ

@@InTVS Yes BMS supports either OpenXR or SteamVR and works really well. It’s definitely worth checking out.

@@__Dusty_ excellent! tnx a lot man, i def will give it a try

@@lunai0076 that’s the best bit, it’s free!

Honestly, it's pretty straightforward these days. The launcher gives you the ability to set your controls in a similar fashion to DCS so you don't have to worry to much about the old school key file setup. The documentation is very completely and there is a user manual and training manual that has all the information you need. But if you just want to have fun you can really jump straight in and blast around.

It's definitely on the cards

Thanks Stevie, miss you mate :)

Thanks legend!!

@ Much appreciation and respect back to you 🙌

It's not broken it's massively simplifed. What they need to do is a full on module.

@@TheSkipjack95Nah it really is broken actually. You can easily notice that the radar display is based on A scope by looking at target attitude.

@@dccox999 just barely

@@Swatmat it’s out!

@@__Dusty_ just seen, TY!

@@__Dusty_ i guess that means 4.38 is still a ways off then

@ yep, still in progress though and getting closer every day

@@__Dusty_ good to hear!

@@Wheelman_PCAS Thanks Wheelman, yes absolutely. It’s coming along slowly but surely :)

Thanks for the comment - Basically it was an educated guess, I have a fairly accurate timeline that tells me if I shoot at a certain range, I should be HPRF active by X range to target. Loose but effective enough till our avionics get more love. The timeline was devised after doing exhaustive tests in the TE editor and shooting a lot of missiles.

@@__Dusty_”exhaustive testing”!! I can imagine.

The missile knows when it goes husky because it knows when it hasn’t yet gone husky

@@Wheelman_PCAS Hahaha yes totally!

What about real fighter pilot and BMS pilot together wajajaja.

Thanks, just a simple mask in Adobe Premiere :)

Hey Slayer, thanks for the comment! The aim was to be able to long skate and recommit without being effectively targeted but unfortunately -2 had to flow cold longer than expected so we were a little on the back foot right from the get go. Gameplan wasn't executed exactly to brief but that's just how it goes I guess. Does the 476th do much LFE style or joint squadron events these days? Would love to see some similar perspectives from DCS or even join you guys in the F-15E sometime :)

​@@__Dusty_ Hey mate, I understand and nevertheless great showcase. There are a few internal LFE in the v476th; none organized in a public setting nor any joint squadron events. However, some members do participate in events like Red Flag or look to participate in another squadrons campaign (but rarely so). As for the F-15E, it is no longer active in the group due to problems with the module. (Big) IF it miraculously gets fixed they might reactivate it. I'll reach out to avoid TLDR here.

Thanks man! The Eagle is still in 'Early access' but is fully functional within the sim. Our priority updates are further refinement and addition of all radar modes. TTA/TTG and missile flyout symbology. Upgrades to AAI, SIT page/link-16 and bugfixes. As for the AMRAAM engagements, in BMS the AIM-120C envelope is much larger than in DCS. Primarily due to the battery life (120sec vs 90sec in DCS) otherwise the aero and booster data is similar. A 50nm shot in BMS against a non-maneuvering target is completely feasible. In this scenario, that shot was to force the red air to maneuver or defend so that follow up shots could be made from a range that would afford a much higher pK.

@@__Dusty_ ah, that's really interesting about the amraam. Sounds like the BMS amraam is not that dissimilar to the phoenix (when engaging fighter size targets). The timeline my squadron uses for the phoenix has our initial shots at 40 to 50 miles to push the target defensive, exactly as you've described.