@@__Dusty_ I ask cause i noticed some weird detection ranges like 80+nms Which doesnt add up. F-16blk 50 nominal radar detection range 35nm x J-11 Rcs of 1.3=45.4nms. Add an additional 1.3 multiplier if in ULS and you get 59.1. So i am baffled by this 88nm lock range i see. Does the VSR mode you use have some significance?
@@lupahole Hi again, just to update - The block 50 in KTT uses the v9 radar (from the stock database) which has greater detection range vs the v5 which explains the greater detection range of 80nm in VSR. VSR does have a lot of significance though, it is far superior at detecting hot aspect targets at greater range. My understanding from reading the -34 is that ULS is modeled exactly the same as RWS so I'm not aware of the 1.3 multiplier from ULS. Do you have a reference for that?
@@__Dusty_ Suspected as much. Regarding ULS, i've run tests and seen at ACMI my detection ranges and how they are modified in relation to RWS. After many tests my conclusion was a 1.3 multiplier. VSR is better however cause it does not suffer from slower sweep rate and seem to offer similar range bonuses (after it was updated).
I like you ICP badge :) Great stuff here thanks for sharing!!
Thanks Prime! I wonder where I got that inspiration from!
@@__Dusty_ I wonder as well, either way it looks great!
great work as usual!
Thanks Serpent!
Great work Dusty!
Thanks Micro!
@@__Dusty_ What are you using for a zoom in/out on your HOTAS?
Nice Job 👍
behind the scenes, at time=0:26, we can see some schematics for BVR: could you please tell where you found them
These can be found in the Korea Training Theater for Falcon BMS. Our squadron shares all their training knowledge in the SOP document. Happy learning!
@@__Dusty_ a link please?
@@akulaxbms1905 forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/19061/korea-training-theater-including-catms-that-can-simulate-missile-fire?page=1
good job!
ありがとうございます
hmm, are you using modified radars?
The radars are not modified, only the AIM120C, PL-12 & AA-12 - more accurate to RL data.
@@__Dusty_ I ask cause i noticed some weird detection ranges like 80+nms Which doesnt add up. F-16blk 50 nominal radar detection range 35nm x J-11 Rcs of 1.3=45.4nms. Add an additional 1.3 multiplier if in ULS and you get 59.1. So i am baffled by this 88nm lock range i see. Does the VSR mode you use have some significance?
@@lupahole Hi again, just to update - The block 50 in KTT uses the v9 radar (from the stock database) which has greater detection range vs the v5 which explains the greater detection range of 80nm in VSR. VSR does have a lot of significance though, it is far superior at detecting hot aspect targets at greater range. My understanding from reading the -34 is that ULS is modeled exactly the same as RWS so I'm not aware of the 1.3 multiplier from ULS. Do you have a reference for that?
@@__Dusty_ Suspected as much. Regarding ULS, i've run tests and seen at ACMI my detection ranges and how they are modified in relation to RWS. After many tests my conclusion was a 1.3 multiplier. VSR is better however cause it does not suffer from slower sweep rate and seem to offer similar range bonuses (after it was updated).
@@__Dusty_ Flightsimmers should know better than to think that any missile data is even remotely accurate.