Me playing single player: "Alright lets slide those settings all the waaaaaaay to the right" Me playing multiplayer: "Alright lets slide those settings all the waaaaaaay to the left"
@@user-zf1tu6zw6q what's the point of changing graphics settings if your game runs fine? The only reason someone would do that in that scenario wpuld be because they think it affects internet performance.
Regarding ray tracing, Turing was always going to be a hardware version of a Steam Early Access release on that front. If you want a seriously good ray tracing performer, wait for the next round of GPU's from both teams.
Someone who gets it. I keep bringing up early steam when it sucked hard on release or DX10/11/12. They all sucked hard but got way better. Also the games featuring ray tracing right now had it added in later. Naturally that’s going to be taxing. Games built with RTX from the get go will run way better than games that Throw it in later.
@@Calypso694 I agree with you that we are in the early stages of the software side as well. It's the same as when DX 10 came put. The DX 10 settings in games didn't seem to visually add much but destroyed even the 8800 Ultra.
Same GPU(cpu is 2643 tho) gives me enough performance in games that I play TQ, CS:GO, HoMM(🤴 of games actuaaly) despite that would've replaced it with some 1030/RX550 for lower consumption. Aside from image quality there's nothing modern games could give me:(
David Jorquera thats not what the og comment meant... What they mean is you can achieve basically the same visuals (indistinguishable) and higher fps with custom settings compared to the high settings.
@@samhain4399 i wuold say that Gtx 970 - Gtx1080ti -??? Is the card what realy exceed them self! Seems like Green and blue team are increasing Core count so ounly AMD have upperhand on RDNA 2.0 on IPC increase? As vega 64 LC owner still wondering about crossfiring or should I upgrade nextgen flagship to fill 1440p 144hz monitor...
people pay so much attention to how Ray Tracing performance sucks but not a word about MSAA. it's a feature that's nearly 20 years old and still able to bring GPUs to their knees when pushed to maximum or 16x. Ray Tracing on the other hand is only 2ish years old and people expect to run it at 4k120+Hz ultra on day 1.
I have a 9700k, a 2070 Super and I game at 1080p. I mostly play indie titles and visual novels so I doubt have a reason to upgrade anytime soon. Yes, I know it's overkill but it's for Cyberpunk and Doom. Also Baldur's Gate 3.
Everyone acting like ray tracing is the whole point of this card. Ray tracing is just a cherry on top. For story games as long as I get 100fps at 1440 I'm fine. For shooters I use my 240hz monitor
I know this comment is 2 months old, but I'm genuinely curious. How do you deal with using different monitors for different types of games? Does it not bother you having to turn your head while playing certain types? Or how is your setup arranged for this? Because for me, if I imagine turning my head, that would make my neck hurt after a session of playing vs the other option being swapping my monitors positions.
I own this card. Raytracing is not practical at 1440p and even 1080p for games like Control. Control I have to set resolution for 1368 by 1024 and dlss upscaling to 1080p and still I have only medium high ray tracing at 1080p to break 110 fps. No way could Raytracing work at 1440p beyond Minecraft
I know that ports of console games to PC are often not well optimized. So no, I won't upgrade to either RTX 2000 or RX 5700 series cards. That other channel you referenced said that only the 2080ti is going to be worth it and last for three more years above 1080p resolution and I'd say they're right. Imagine buying a 2080 Super today for $790 and it being outdated for AAA games later this year. It could happen.
I usually jump to the next gen for resale value purposes. Regardless of the new bells and whistles something is offering. You can cut the price tag of new hardware in half that way, usually.
@Zane White - You'll probably still be able to turn ray tracing off on those games and still be fine. I intend to hold onto my 1070 Ti @ 1080p for the next couple of years. Granted, I doubt I'll be playing the latest and "greatest" games at that point anyway. Most modern games are just not worth $60 anymore, so I always wait for a year or two after release for heavy discounts.
when using ray tracing, usually people will use DLSS. im not sure if all these games really have a DLSS option. but i know some do, and they make ray tracing an option. Although, i don't really use ray tracing on my 2080 super. the 3000 series can do it no problem but im not sold on RT even using a 3080. maybe in another generation or two, but for now i dont use it, nor do i recommend using it.
Ahaaa. Thank you for this video. It really reinforces my decision to run my Palit GameRox RTX Super on a 1080p panel. On COD MW (2019) I can pretty much max out the setting and still manage 130 - 144 fps (depending on the map)
I like this video as it doesnt go too far into detail causing confusion strait to the point. i ordered a gaming pc recently with the same graphics card but the RTX2070 version. I have excluded the 1440p panels from my search, and have been searching for a 27" 240hz 1080p IPS display, but been finding it difficult to find the right one. The issue others are having is soo many are getting sucked into the marketing scenes and are used the normal FPS they get with their 1080p display, and think they can get the same FPS with a 1440p display, or there are people who have even less experience and trying far less powerful cards and then posting vids how nice the graphics look while the card struggles to give any sort of performance even when settings are dialed back
@@Rodrigo-G Not sure about OP but I have a Galax 2080 Super and it's very impressive even with a 2600x. 3440x1440p gaming is 100+ on any title and for cod it's 90-120 with RTX/SSR enabled so you can imagine with custom settings it'll push more. This is without an OC. Card has stable oc similar to OP but its all crammed into the nzxt H1 so i've just done some 40mm noctua fan mods to help vent out the gpu heat and so far 5-Celsius drop. Idk if u wanted or needed half of this info but its here lol
As someone watching this video from 2022, and as someone who owns a 2070 Super, I'm slightly worse off than someone who owns a 2080 Super. The 3000 series cards weren't the huge jump we hoped for, and since 2020-2022 was filled with an insane gpu market full of crypto whales and scalpers buying every RTX 3000 series card there was, its been a crappy couple years for anyone who wanted a new graphics card or new rig. The RTX 4000 series seems to be a much bigger jump in performance, but Nvidia went insane with the prices, so now high end cards have jumped from $799 for the 2080 Super and 3080 to $1200 for the 4080. Largest jump in price in history, so now, buying any new cards is the same exact thing as buying from scalpers last generation for the RTX 3000 series. Its really unfortunate that Nvidia got so greedy and is now price gouging their own customers. They don't have the crypto crowd to buy their cards anymore.
Congratulations on being recognized by EVGA. One of my favorites. Great video! I've actually thought about downgrading my 2080Ti. Mostly for financial reasons. But to answer your question, yes I am happy with my current config of 3900x and 2080Ti. And probably would consider the 3080ti depending on the boost.
Thanks for the nice comment. 😊 I understand what you mean about down sizing, depending on what games you spend most of your time playing, the RTX 2080 Ti could be over kill. Good luck with the decision. 😊
I have the 2080 TI XC Ultra and I got it a little over a year ago. It is really all I think that I need for the foreseeable. I might wait until the new consoles come out and see what that does to the landscape of the video card market and go from there.
Looking for an Upgrade, let's see pricing when AMD launches, and Nvidia s Reaction to it. RTX is still not a Feature that should influence too much. It is still in its infancy
Optimizing game settings for better performance without sacrificing visual quality helps tremendously. I can't wait to see the numbers when all the new games start implementing DLSS 2.0 because this will let you hit that 144 fps without RT or hit basically the same frame rate you would normally with it off when you turn it on. It's the biggest leap in gaming technology I've seen and am truly excited about in a long time. It almost makes me want to make the jump to an RTX card finally.
I just had a pc built a few months ago to basically the same standards you tested including the 2080 super, and I'm not worried about ray tracing, maybe after a few years, but not any time soon. Rocking over about 100+fps on almost every game I play without overclocking so far, and even staying over 60fps in star citizen.
Currently using 1080, waiting for next generation of RTX cards to come out as I am already using a 1440p 165Hz monitor. Need about 2 to 3 times the performance to push this. If the current 1660 can do 1080 120hz I'm sure the next mid-level should get me close to that goal. Fingers crossed.
Edgar Ordonez What’s your refresh rate? I recently got a 2070 super and a 1440p monitor. I’m waiting for it in the mail right now, but there isn’t many reviews on the 2070 super at 1440p and 144/165hz. I’m just hoping I can get above 60fps on high/ultra settings.
you should get Control for future benchmarks, it is very well optimized and with juicy RTX, I could set everything to the very ultra settings with a rtx 2070
Control is a hard game to run. I couldn't get a stable 60fps at native 4k with ray tracing. Had to downscale to 1440p with dlss and turn half the ray tracing effects off to keep it stable over 60fps. On a 2080ti. But it did still look fantastic. And I had a blast playing the game.
2070 super is the best bang for buck high end graphics card. When overclocked it can almost rival a 2080 super. Put that extra money towards a better cooler, etc.
@@mjisurdad in all fairness I was just unironically pointing that out, now after checking out more of their cards, yeah clearly it’s just a branding thing. I was just making a correlation I had at the time, y’feel.
Although, I would bet that newer implementations of ray tracing becomes more optimised on the software side. Especially as the new consoles launch. I assume the first games with ray tracing just slapped RT in there at the last minute without optimising much. Current games have a very large number of known shortcuts and optimisations that developers use to work with hardware limitations that are just being discovered. there is a good chance that these cards mature as ray tracing matures on a software level in games.
Only thing higher is a rtx 2080ti ands that's 1200$ so just reduce some graphics fidelity if you aren't getting 144 at 1440p. Honestly speaking after Rx 5700xt the margin of diminishng returns really kicks in and at most would be practical to get a rtx 2070 S. You much rather save that money and say you spent 450$ then buy new GPU next gen or next to next gen with a better implementation of rtx and actually be able play rtx games with the 750-800$ saved & you could make sure you can still game at 1440p 144hz with or even Higher like 4k 144hz .
DDTS: "Is the Nvidia RTX 2080 SUPER powerful enough for 1440P 144Hz gaming in 2020? " Me: "Is the AMD RX 570 8GB powerful enough for 900P 144Hz gaming in 2020? "
In Modern Warfare with RTX on, I get over 100 fps in Warzone, 100fps in most areas in multiplayer and dips as low as 25fps in other areas on multiplayer. But with RTX off, those dips go away.
I have found a couple of textures behind stairs or tunnels in metro that look like shit. Every metro game has been known to be poorly optimized. Yet I dont deny is one of the best looking games out there. Doom doesnt have that Open world factor but still looks amazing and runs on everything. Developers work a lot to optimize for consoles, they dont do the same for pcs
@@PanzerVII-df8hg RDR2 doesn't run as smooth because id software helped develop Vulkan. It only makes sense they would use it for their own product. But yes, lots of triple A games could benefit from better optimization.
That's the exact same card that I have. I'm running a 1440P 144Hz G-Sync Dell monitor. I'll have to look again but I haven't noticed any problems with ray tracing. Love this card.
Hey, I have 1080 as well. I think it does struggle with more recent games. I'm playing doom at ultra and a lot of times running close to 144fps, gonna have to check the average yet though, with stock and oc. PC2 runs 100-120fps I think, a bit newer game.
Update mid 2021. Gaming with DLSS at Quality setting (instead of the Ultra performance) and Raytracing on my ASUS RTX 2080 Super with all Ultra settings @ 1440p is fantastic and super smooth with the detail approaching 4k, no frame drops, especially in Cyberpunk 2077 that is very graphically intense, and is G Sync to 75hz that is plenty response for me, I get 120 FPS Ultra settings in GTA5 vsync off, but not at 144hz. I will try the high settings as mentioned in this video to see if I can hit higher frames, but I like all the Ultra gfx detail on my 32" monitor. SPECS- i9900KF @ 5.1Ghz, 16GB T-Force @4000Mhz dual channel, ASUS ASUS RTX 2080 Super OC, ASUS ROG Strix Z390F MB, 512GB x 2 dual channel M.2 NVME ADATA Spetrix S40Gs
@@bennyhaha66 The average person could buy a 5700xt or a 2070s if they stopped waisting money on trivial everyday stuff like always buying coffee from a shop even to just take it home. The average PC builder will buy a 9900k or a 3900x and a super high end mobo only to realize that now they went way out of a budget and a 1660ti is all they can afford.
@@MrBearyMcBearface they had a 1080 ti, but I guess 1080p 144hz is right when you test it on ultra in the most demanding games of 2019 and 2020, like RDR2
Hey so I know this video was made a while back and I’ve been looking at this graphics card for a while now because I want to upgrade from my Gtx 1050 ti to a more powerful card so I’d be able to stream. And render videos. But I’m not sure if rtx 2080 would be the pick for me. Any help? Seems to me that everyone is just saying that the 2080 is overpriced but I also can’t find any cards on stock.
Try to get a 3060 ti tomorrow morning at 6am when they launch. Im in the same position as you and i was not fortunate enough to get a 3070. Hopefully tomorrow they will have more stock than the other 30 series cards did. Whatever you do, DO NOT BUY A 2000 SERIES CARD!!! AND DON'T BUY FROM SCALPERS!!!
I get pretty much the same exact numbers with a 3800x + 2070S, except that I've got everything maxxed out. So it's somewhat safe to say that either something was bottlenecking your system, OR it doesn't matter at all
800th like. Enjoy it. I recently upgraded my GPU. I was looking at the 5700 XT, then considered the RTX 2060 Super for its raw performance plus the turing video encoder, But ultimately got the GTX 1660 Super since it was around a similar price I paid for a GTX 960 4G in 2016. The saved money is going to a better monitor that actually will do the advertised 144hz. The model I got in late 2015 is the G2460PQU, and you can look up frame skipping to see what's wrong with it. At the time I was planed to upgrade to a better GPU in the future(which is now) and finally enjoy 144hz but no. I eventually learned it didn't even work as it should have until I checked it on that UFO test site.
I was lucky enough to get to test my friend's 3080. The difference isn't much, but the stability, plus the desire to drop my 2080 super in my server rig for plex transcoding, makes it worth it for me. In my experience, you can get similar results by backing down the settings, but if you want to go all out settings wise, AND get 144 fps + for your 144hz monitor, even at 1080p on games like modern warfare and Cyberpunk (which i didn't test at the time) and flight sim 2020, the 3080 is worth the upgrade.
One of the biggest issues with frame loss at 1440p is AA , if High preset has MSAA x4 that will KILL your frames, I found even with 1070GTX , just turning off AA will run the game quite well. But this is ofc, personal preference.
Thank you for making the effort with this video. You answered my question of the last couple of weeks, which card to buy in the nearest future. I was going to build the system this year, and now I know I should definitely wait for next gen as it's not worth the money right now. Performance per dollar of this cards is going to drop fast as I see and they aren't as future proof as they should. Hope next gen will fix it and it wont be such headache to choose a card 😅
I got a pc with a i7 4790k, 32gb ram running at 2133ish mhz, paired with gtx 1080, and it works just fine for me, the only ''problem'' if I can even call it that is that newer games doesn't run at stable 120+ fps at all times and makes me notice the dips in framerate due to my monitor being a 1080p 144hz one, that I don't really have a plan on changing till it eventually dies or when I've actually got a upgraded rig that makes the monitor ''ancient'' as if it were a 4:3 1024x768 crt or something along the line. The thing is whenever games run at under stable 90fps or higher, it feels choppy with a 144hz monitor just due to it being more noticable on it than if you were running the same game on a 60hz monitor.
Great video! It’s funny I came across your video I just bought this very same model 2080 super yet to install it. I currently have a EVGA 2070 xc ultra non super and it’s a great card. Was going to get the 2070 super for a second pc but the jump was not that much and the 2080 super is close to a 1080ti. I think it will last for at least 3 to 5 years with spending a ridiculous amount on the 2080ti.
Dude you are quite literally using my exact setup, except I crammed it into an itx case and I have 32 gigs of RAM. But hey! Good to know what I can get when I decide to leave the 1080p life.
Me playing single player: "Alright lets slide those settings all the waaaaaaay to the right"
Me playing multiplayer: "Alright lets slide those settings all the waaaaaaay to the left"
Graphics settings don't affect internet performance
@@ethane.9473 internet performance... FPS is client-side
@@grenadeout562 lol!
liubodimaka (359) and?
@@user-zf1tu6zw6q what's the point of changing graphics settings if your game runs fine? The only reason someone would do that in that scenario wpuld be because they think it affects internet performance.
Why do we still bother with csgo in gpu benchmarks lol
Preach
Exactly might as well benchmark the sims 1 😂
Framerates ... it’s a very optimized game
The game isn't optimised it's just old, the framerates can't even get higher
Everyone plays it
“High is for gaming, ultra is for screenshots” I just slide my setting all the way to the right
You got a 2080ti or something?😂
shadow of the tomb raider on ultra at 1080 @ 144 on a vega 64
Ultra always my dude!
@Gamer Lix can't wait to upgrade my 2080ti! I need that 4k ultra with max ray tracing!
@Gamer Lix yeah my 2080ti cost me $1700 Canadian about 2 months ago. Kinda wish I waited for 3080 but what can you do.
Regarding ray tracing, Turing was always going to be a hardware version of a Steam Early Access release on that front. If you want a seriously good ray tracing performer, wait for the next round of GPU's from both teams.
That is kind of the point I was trying to make with the video. But you put it really well. 😁
Someone who gets it. I keep bringing up early steam when it sucked hard on release or DX10/11/12. They all sucked hard but got way better. Also the games featuring ray tracing right now had it added in later. Naturally that’s going to be taxing. Games built with RTX from the get go will run way better than games that Throw it in later.
@@Calypso694 I agree with you that we are in the early stages of the software side as well. It's the same as when DX 10 came put. The DX 10 settings in games didn't seem to visually add much but destroyed even the 8800 Ultra.
yea im skipping turing on that front and mabey ampere and arcturus
Early adopters always get the shaft. Their sacrifice means that the rest of us get a fully developed product later on.
people: you can't get 4k ultra settings ultra ray tracing stable 60 fps even with rtx 2080 ti
me: *cries in gtx950*
Man just sell it and get a RX 570, you'll thank yourself later.
@@xXkurosenpaiXx now it's useless cause my cpu is *q6600* lol
Same GPU(cpu is 2643 tho) gives me enough performance in games that I play TQ, CS:GO, HoMM(🤴 of games actuaaly) despite that would've replaced it with some 1030/RX550 for lower consumption. Aside from image quality there's nothing modern games could give me:(
My 2080 TI on a full custom loop @ 2100 Mhz does ok. Then again I only run 3440 x 1440 as 4k is just not worth the FPS reduction.
@@xXkurosenpaiXx Ummm no, because I own a 4k monitor and an RX 570 is crap at that resolution
I like to set my games on "slide show mode" for best visuals and enough time to get a good look at each frame to appreciate the devs hard work.
Funny
motmus mom true but at the same time I do know it a joke, still better to have more FPS
LMAO SAME
my GT640 does that automatically for me, its a feature.
"You can always use more power". Well, there we go guys, Jeremy Clarkson arrived to the computer world :D.
Powwwaahhh!!!
😂😂😂 that shit cracked me up
@@chadbizeau5997 Speeeeeeeeed!!!!!! :D
Speed and powaaaaaa
powaaaa
Thats the issue with high presets, they make the frame rate suffer with unnecessary high settings, always best off using custom settings IMO
I always play on a mixture of high and ultra
That's a good point. Benchmarks can change so much based on settings used.
Depends on the games as well, if it's games like Tomb raider I just put it on high/ ultra. For FPS games I put AA on medium and the rest on low or off
David Jorquera thats not what the og comment meant... What they mean is you can achieve basically the same visuals (indistinguishable) and higher fps with custom settings compared to the high settings.
William Well if yr a very discerning person that’s all about the visuals with 4K you can almost always tell the differences though.
I’m still rocking a 1070 lol. Ray tracing is the last of my concerns
Though dlss shouldn't be underrated especially if games keep adding it
I'm not divorcing from 1080 Ti for that same reason and it works perfectly fine @1440p; until next-gen Red and Green teams show some majick
Also repping the 1070 and see no reason to upgrade yet
Using a 1080 here think our cards will be fine years to come
@@samhain4399 i wuold say that Gtx 970 - Gtx1080ti -??? Is the card what realy exceed them self! Seems like Green and blue team are increasing Core count so ounly AMD have upperhand on RDNA 2.0 on IPC increase? As vega 64 LC owner still wondering about crossfiring or should I upgrade nextgen flagship to fill 1440p 144hz monitor...
people pay so much attention to how Ray Tracing performance sucks but not a word about MSAA. it's a feature that's nearly 20 years old and still able to bring GPUs to their knees when pushed to maximum or 16x. Ray Tracing on the other hand is only 2ish years old and people expect to run it at 4k120+Hz ultra on day 1.
I have a 9700k, a 2070 Super and I game at 1080p. I mostly play indie titles and visual novels so I doubt have a reason to upgrade anytime soon. Yes, I know it's overkill but it's for Cyberpunk and Doom. Also Baldur's Gate 3.
This is a very niche kinda of video but I’m so happy you made it.
Everyone acting like ray tracing is the whole point of this card. Ray tracing is just a cherry on top. For story games as long as I get 100fps at 1440 I'm fine. For shooters I use my 240hz monitor
I know this comment is 2 months old, but I'm genuinely curious. How do you deal with using different monitors for different types of games? Does it not bother you having to turn your head while playing certain types? Or how is your setup arranged for this? Because for me, if I imagine turning my head, that would make my neck hurt after a session of playing vs the other option being swapping my monitors positions.
@@YamaJuugo I use LG32gk850 144z 1440p monitor, when i play story based games I limit fps to 60 and when I play shooters then no fps limit.
I own this card. Raytracing is not practical at 1440p and even 1080p for games like Control. Control I have to set resolution for 1368 by 1024 and dlss upscaling to 1080p and still I have only medium high ray tracing at 1080p to break 110 fps. No way could Raytracing work at 1440p beyond Minecraft
what kind of monitor are you using for shooting games
I can afford a new gpu right now in the 1k to 1.5k range but im still happy with my RTX 2080 not super. Im playing alot of 2022 racing titles
are you just going to namedrop my boi tech deals like that?!
Haha!! Maybe? 😅
Deal Nation represent!
the same quality settings argument can be used for ray tracing:
RTX ON for screenshots
RTX OFF for actual gameplay
It all looks like someone just stuck some "super" stickers on the RTX 2080 🤣
I have the same card, and they quite literally did.
It's pretty much a binned 2080 imo
@@u1richh With faster GDDR6, but yeah
It’s true I have a 2070 super and it’s all just added on.
@@u1richh No it's not, because the VRAM is running even faster than the 2080 Ti (15.5 Gbps vs 14Gpbs)
most informative quarantine video. cheers
My man dawid! You were featured on the latest linustechtips video!!
It was the WAN show my friend
I know that ports of console games to PC are often not well optimized. So no, I won't upgrade to either RTX 2000 or RX 5700 series cards. That other channel you referenced said that only the 2080ti is going to be worth it and last for three more years above 1080p resolution and I'd say they're right. Imagine buying a 2080 Super today for $790 and it being outdated for AAA games later this year. It could happen.
I'll wait at least 3 generations before jumping into the ray tracing bandwagon
I usually jump to the next gen for resale value purposes. Regardless of the new bells and whistles something is offering.
You can cut the price tag of new hardware in half that way, usually.
Selling your last gen gpu while it’s still worth some cash is a good idea it’s what I do
if raytracing is still around anyways
@Zane White - You'll probably still be able to turn ray tracing off on those games and still be fine. I intend to hold onto my 1070 Ti @ 1080p for the next couple of years. Granted, I doubt I'll be playing the latest and "greatest" games at that point anyway. Most modern games are just not worth $60 anymore, so I always wait for a year or two after release for heavy discounts.
when using ray tracing, usually people will use DLSS. im not sure if all these games really have a DLSS option. but i know some do, and they make ray tracing an option. Although, i don't really use ray tracing on my 2080 super. the 3000 series can do it no problem but im not sold on RT even using a 3080. maybe in another generation or two, but for now i dont use it, nor do i recommend using it.
Ahaaa. Thank you for this video. It really reinforces my decision to run my Palit GameRox RTX Super on a 1080p panel.
On COD MW (2019) I can pretty much max out the setting and still manage 130 - 144 fps (depending on the map)
I like this video as it doesnt go too far into detail causing confusion strait to the point. i ordered a gaming pc recently with the same graphics card but the RTX2070 version. I have excluded the 1440p panels from my search, and have been searching for a 27" 240hz 1080p IPS display, but been finding it difficult to find the right one. The issue others are having is soo many are getting sucked into the marketing scenes and are used the normal FPS they get with their 1080p display, and think they can get the same FPS with a 1440p display, or there are people who have even less experience and trying far less powerful cards and then posting vids how nice the graphics look while the card struggles to give any sort of performance even when settings are dialed back
My 2080 Super has been preforming like a beast. OCed at 2070Mhz I get 140+ FPS in most games I've played at 1440p.
2080s which brand?
Rodrigo Gonzalez rtx
@@Rodrigo-G he means which Nvidia RTX brand?
@@Rodrigo-G Not sure about OP but I have a Galax 2080 Super and it's very impressive even with a 2600x. 3440x1440p gaming is 100+ on any title and for cod it's 90-120 with RTX/SSR enabled so you can imagine with custom settings it'll push more. This is without an OC. Card has stable oc similar to OP but its all crammed into the nzxt H1 so i've just done some 40mm noctua fan mods to help vent out the gpu heat and so far 5-Celsius drop. Idk if u wanted or needed half of this info but its here lol
What about 2024?
As someone watching this video from 2022, and as someone who owns a 2070 Super, I'm slightly worse off than someone who owns a 2080 Super. The 3000 series cards weren't the huge jump we hoped for, and since 2020-2022 was filled with an insane gpu market full of crypto whales and scalpers buying every RTX 3000 series card there was, its been a crappy couple years for anyone who wanted a new graphics card or new rig. The RTX 4000 series seems to be a much bigger jump in performance, but Nvidia went insane with the prices, so now high end cards have jumped from $799 for the 2080 Super and 3080 to $1200 for the 4080. Largest jump in price in history, so now, buying any new cards is the same exact thing as buying from scalpers last generation for the RTX 3000 series. Its really unfortunate that Nvidia got so greedy and is now price gouging their own customers. They don't have the crypto crowd to buy their cards anymore.
Congratulations on being recognized by EVGA. One of my favorites. Great video! I've actually thought about downgrading my 2080Ti. Mostly for financial reasons. But to answer your question, yes I am happy with my current config of 3900x and 2080Ti. And probably would consider the 3080ti depending on the boost.
Thanks for the nice comment. 😊 I understand what you mean about down sizing, depending on what games you spend most of your time playing, the RTX 2080 Ti could be over kill. Good luck with the decision. 😊
I have the 2080 TI XC Ultra and I got it a little over a year ago. It is really all I think that I need for the foreseeable. I might wait until the new consoles come out and see what that does to the landscape of the video card market and go from there.
Looking for an Upgrade, let's see pricing when AMD launches, and Nvidia s Reaction to it. RTX is still not a Feature that should influence too much. It is still in its infancy
amd cards don't even work right too much of a headache
@@TheSjh196 ever. they never fucking work right
Optimizing game settings for better performance without sacrificing visual quality helps tremendously. I can't wait to see the numbers when all the new games start implementing DLSS 2.0 because this will let you hit that 144 fps without RT or hit basically the same frame rate you would normally with it off when you turn it on. It's the biggest leap in gaming technology I've seen and am truly excited about in a long time. It almost makes me want to make the jump to an RTX card finally.
Happy with my 2070 super and i7-7700K for now. I would probably need a cpu upgrade before I need a gpu upgrade.
Lol, thats fking good cpu, still with FX 8300 :Dd
Better get a Ryzen CPU.
Don't bother on either. I upgraded my 2600k for a ryzen 3600. Actually don't feel any difference
@@juicy9592 really? Go check out some benchmarks and you'll see like a 20 fps difference between those two CPU's.
I have the same setup and was thinking the same thing probably get intel 11th or ryzren 5000
I just had a pc built a few months ago to basically the same standards you tested including the 2080 super, and I'm not worried about ray tracing, maybe after a few years, but not any time soon. Rocking over about 100+fps on almost every game I play without overclocking so far, and even staying over 60fps in star citizen.
This was the exact question I was wondering about. Thank you
Currently using 1080, waiting for next generation of RTX cards to come out as I am already using a 1440p 165Hz monitor. Need about 2 to 3 times the performance to push this. If the current 1660 can do 1080 120hz I'm sure the next mid-level should get me close to that goal. Fingers crossed.
end of 2021 now and there are still no games with raytracing that are relevant for me, even tho i got a 2080super
Thing is a 3080ti struggles to run 100+ fps with rtx on .
That’s because RTX is trash, just turn it off
This is more than enough power. I use a 2070 super and it runs all games at 1440p more than good.
Edgar Ordonez What’s your refresh rate? I recently got a 2070 super and a 1440p monitor. I’m waiting for it in the mail right now, but there isn’t many reviews on the 2070 super at 1440p and 144/165hz. I’m just hoping I can get above 60fps on high/ultra settings.
You're good! .. paired with a G-sync monitor makes for a buttery smooth experience...
you should get Control for future benchmarks, it is very well optimized and with juicy RTX, I could set everything to the very ultra settings with a rtx 2070
That is a great suggestion. I will look into that. 👍
How many fps you get if I ran that game on ultra settings at 1440p with rtx on I got 38 fps and that's with a 2070 super
@@bubbaj1997 I hit constant 60fps with 1080p, didn't try with vsync off
Control is a hard game to run. I couldn't get a stable 60fps at native 4k with ray tracing. Had to downscale to 1440p with dlss and turn half the ray tracing effects off to keep it stable over 60fps. On a 2080ti. But it did still look fantastic. And I had a blast playing the game.
@@saskmuddinatv but whats your gpu?
WAA an nother amazing video love it :D
Im glad you enjoyed it. 😁
I have a 2070 super. No plans to update until games start requiring more.
2070 super is the best bang for buck high end graphics card. When overclocked it can almost rival a 2080 super. Put that extra money towards a better cooler, etc.
DLSS2.0 support will save performance in many games. If you get 55FPS in game with RTX on, turning on DLSS2.0 will get you at least 80FPS.
Why do the fans look like they just got back from being out on a rainy day... you have me certified trippin
Evga does all cards that way
@@mjisurdad in all fairness I was just unironically pointing that out, now after checking out more of their cards, yeah clearly it’s just a branding thing. I was just making a correlation I had at the time, y’feel.
Although, I would bet that newer implementations of ray tracing becomes more optimised on the software side. Especially as the new consoles launch. I assume the first games with ray tracing just slapped RT in there at the last minute without optimising much. Current games have a very large number of known shortcuts and optimisations that developers use to work with hardware limitations that are just being discovered. there is a good chance that these cards mature as ray tracing matures on a software level in games.
You already at "is rtx 2080super enough?" and i'm here with no pc waiting to build a pc with an rx 570 and get broke for the next month
Only thing higher is a rtx 2080ti ands that's 1200$ so just reduce some graphics fidelity if you aren't getting 144 at 1440p. Honestly speaking after Rx 5700xt the margin of diminishng returns really kicks in and at most would be practical to get a rtx 2070 S. You much rather save that money and say you spent 450$ then buy new GPU next gen or next to next gen with a better implementation of rtx and actually be able play rtx games with the 750-800$ saved & you could make sure you can still game at 1440p 144hz with or even Higher like 4k 144hz .
I’m going to buy next generation graphics card because RTX 2080 TI isn’t enough for me because really want to get 144HZ on 1440P with RTX ON
Yeah good luck with that
Yay Tech Deals reference! Two gold stars for you, Dawid
My PC: Has just GTX 1060
Dawid: Is RTX 2080 enough? (makes it sound like it is not powerful)
(°_o)
3gb or 6gb? Eh, guess it doesn't matter anymore in 2020.
@@Armytoast 6GB
1060 is fine
I am using my 1060 6GB with 1440p and it is perfectly fine.
lol I have a 2gb gtx 1050
I love the funky grooves you play during the benchmarks. crunchy
Still waiting for that vega 56 video (If it ever happens)
Imagine waiting a video for an old amd gpu that nobody cares about
night. Actually a lot of people care.
Yeah same
Even a 1080 gtx run game high ultra setting fine. Why would it be a problem for 2080????????
DDTS: "Is the Nvidia RTX 2080 SUPER powerful enough for 1440P 144Hz gaming in 2020?
"
Me: "Is the AMD RX 570 8GB powerful enough for 900P 144Hz gaming in 2020?
"
If we're using high settings then no
Me: Is the Vega 8 powerful enough for 720p 60hz gaming in 2020?
Is my intel HD 4000 graphics powerful enough for 240p gaming screenshots in 2013?
@@CaelVK yes in all esports titles
Me: my AMD R9 290 can run bfV at low settings 110 fps, 1080p
My GPU: turns into toaster
In Modern Warfare with RTX on, I get over 100 fps in Warzone, 100fps in most areas in multiplayer and dips as low as 25fps in other areas on multiplayer. But with RTX off, those dips go away.
It’s the second best card on the market right now, after 2080ti. Of course it’s powerful enough.
__ titan is not really for gamers, and it’s ridiculously overpriced, so it doesn’t count
It's the third, if you count the RTX Titan
because you referenced Tech Deals, you get my sub
Next video:
"Is vega 8 onboard graphics enough for 240p60 in 2020?"
Answer: No
*Cries in vega 8*
brother i like your opening riffs.. and all of your content you provide to us rock on !
"DLSS 2.0 enters the game"
was about to comment that
Just bought an i7 9700k and rtx 2080 super it’s badass
AC Odyssey & metro could use some advice from the developers of Doom :v
Doom utilizes Vulkan API, that's why it runs so smooth.
I have found a couple of textures behind stairs or tunnels in metro that look like shit. Every metro game has been known to be poorly optimized. Yet I dont deny is one of the best looking games out there. Doom doesnt have that Open world factor but still looks amazing and runs on everything. Developers work a lot to optimize for consoles, they dont do the same for pcs
Yet I consider doom a more polished game since I havent found any "oopsie" small square on a random place that looks like 144p
@@PanzerVII-df8hg RDR2 doesn't run as smooth because id software helped develop Vulkan. It only makes sense they would use it for their own product. But yes, lots of triple A games could benefit from better optimization.
That's the exact same card that I have. I'm running a 1440P 144Hz G-Sync Dell monitor. I'll have to look again but I haven't noticed any problems with ray tracing. Love this card.
Seriously? You can get 120+ fps at 1440p on Pascal cards. Who's even asking this question?
To be honest i upgraded my gpu and now it performed waaay better than before and now i'm happy
What are you even saying?! My gtx 1080 still rocks when it comes to 1440p 144hz
pfft, I'm pulling 240fps @ 8k with my Riva TNT, with ray tracing enabled!
Yeah seriously.
With majority of the games I play with the 1080 few I’m pulling 100+
Hey, I have 1080 as well. I think it does struggle with more recent games.
I'm playing doom at ultra and a lot of times running close to 144fps, gonna have to check the average yet though, with stock and oc.
PC2 runs 100-120fps I think, a bit newer game.
Update mid 2021. Gaming with DLSS at Quality setting (instead of the Ultra performance) and Raytracing on my ASUS RTX 2080 Super with all Ultra settings @ 1440p is fantastic and super smooth with the detail approaching 4k, no frame drops, especially in Cyberpunk 2077 that is very graphically intense, and is G Sync to 75hz that is plenty response for me, I get 120 FPS Ultra settings in GTA5 vsync off, but not at 144hz. I will try the high settings as mentioned in this video to see if I can hit higher frames, but I like all the Ultra gfx detail on my 32" monitor. SPECS- i9900KF @ 5.1Ghz, 16GB T-Force @4000Mhz dual channel, ASUS ASUS RTX 2080 Super OC, ASUS ROG Strix Z390F MB, 512GB x 2 dual channel M.2 NVME ADATA Spetrix S40Gs
you're really flexing that GPU you got sent
It's a loaner from the loaner program. Anyone with a media following can get one
I sold my rx 5700xt for 430 on eBay and I am getting an rtx 2080s for 450€ now. Only 20 bucks more :)
I would love to upgrade my GPU but my wallet would hate it!
Fair enough. GPUs be so expensive. 😲
Think of the unneeded things you spend money on daily, add those up for a year, much more than a bad ass graphics card.
@@bennyhaha66 The average person could buy a 5700xt or a 2070s if they stopped waisting money on trivial everyday stuff like always buying coffee from a shop even to just take it home. The average PC builder will buy a 9900k or a 3900x and a super high end mobo only to realize that now they went way out of a budget and a 1660ti is all they can afford.
@@tasoszoomborg Depends on what country they also live in because prices bump up and income difference
I bought a 2070RTX super and my VR experiance has become so much smoother
"144fps mark" hahaha im on babushkas toaster ive been getting 30fps stable since day 1 (2011)
Honestly my second favorite tech channel
All well and good but youtube made me watch this in 144 :(
That sucks. Sorry to hear that.
Damn I always get to watch in 720p or 1080p
I have a 2080 super and don't even turn on rat tracing but unless its single player game. Also glad to see your channel doing well.
Can you give feedback on your 2080s for this moment?in what resolution you play? What with fps/settings in new game's?
How is this even a question? Yes it is. I play the majority of my games at this framerate and hz.
Yeah.. I saw the title and thought, is this click bait?
Idk there are quite a few people who think that a 2080/1080 ti is just a 1080p 144hz gpu. And then the 2080 ti is just shy of a 1440p 144hz gpu.
@@dapz those people are either in denial with their weaker older cards, or they have titans and are out of touch with reality
@@MrBearyMcBearface they had a 1080 ti, but I guess 1080p 144hz is right when you test it on ultra in the most demanding games of 2019 and 2020, like RDR2
@@dapz it's not worth the price at all but the 2080ti is like 50% or more more performant than the 1080ti
Hey so I know this video was made a while back and I’ve been looking at this graphics card for a while now because I want to upgrade from my Gtx 1050 ti to a more powerful card so I’d be able to stream. And render videos. But I’m not sure if rtx 2080 would be the pick for me. Any help? Seems to me that everyone is just saying that the 2080 is overpriced but I also can’t find any cards on stock.
Try to get a 3060 ti tomorrow morning at 6am when they launch. Im in the same position as you and i was not fortunate enough to get a 3070. Hopefully tomorrow they will have more stock than the other 30 series cards did.
Whatever you do, DO NOT BUY A 2000 SERIES CARD!!! AND DON'T BUY FROM SCALPERS!!!
@@muchostacos67 yeah. im not buying a 2000 series card. and which website do you think would be best to camp through the night until morning. newegg?
@@muchostacos67 how do you know it's at 6 am?
Ray tracing off problem solved
That's the 2080 Super i had. I gave it to my friend when i got my 3090, it OC like a beast.
I have a 1050 ti and im sad
Rockin the 1080 Ti and as long as I can get 60 to 100 fps I am more than happy with it, it allowed me to skip these overpriced piece of shit RTX cards
Don't be sad. That graphics card can really carry it's weight.
You. i got a evga gtx 960 but its the best 960 You can get lol
I had the 1050 2gb OEM until very recently, its not that bad
I run a Vega 64 in my garage, this way I don't have to start the wood stove in the winter.
Well put together, informative. thank you for your upload.
I got the 2070 super and it's enough
I get pretty much the same exact numbers with a 3800x + 2070S, except that I've got everything maxxed out. So it's somewhat safe to say that either something was bottlenecking your system, OR it doesn't matter at all
Watching with my 2060 which is barely capable of 1440p 75hz 😭
bro are you actually complaining that's a great GPU
You must be grateful
the 2060 is for 1080p anyway
@@ollydickinson2196 yeah i know its a good gpu but i wanted to play @ 1440. Anyway respect to low spec gamers
@@heraze get a 5700XT when the driver issues have been fixed or wait for the 3060 or 70
800th like. Enjoy it.
I recently upgraded my GPU. I was looking at the 5700 XT, then considered the RTX 2060 Super for its raw performance plus the turing video encoder, But ultimately got the GTX 1660 Super since it was around a similar price I paid for a GTX 960 4G in 2016.
The saved money is going to a better monitor that actually will do the advertised 144hz. The model I got in late 2015 is the G2460PQU, and you can look up frame skipping to see what's wrong with it. At the time I was planed to upgrade to a better GPU in the future(which is now) and finally enjoy 144hz but no. I eventually learned it didn't even work as it should have until I checked it on that UFO test site.
There's never enough power
I was lucky enough to get to test my friend's 3080. The difference isn't much, but the stability, plus the desire to drop my 2080 super in my server rig for plex transcoding, makes it worth it for me. In my experience, you can get similar results by backing down the settings, but if you want to go all out settings wise, AND get 144 fps + for your 144hz monitor, even at 1080p on games like modern warfare and Cyberpunk (which i didn't test at the time) and flight sim 2020, the 3080 is worth the upgrade.
I am in Australia so I can't comment early damnit
Haha!! Fair enough.
i bet somewhere down your family tree you have people that were criminals lol
After watching the first generation of ray tracing, I’m glad I waited it out but am ready to embrace it.
whenever i choose weed strains ...i always pick ultra high...just sayin
Lol
From someone that just upgraded from a 2060 Super i love this card :)
1 LIKE = 2080TI
One of the biggest issues with frame loss at 1440p is AA , if High preset has MSAA x4 that will KILL your frames, I found even with 1070GTX , just turning off AA will run the game quite well. But this is ofc, personal preference.
Been thinking of buying this card but I'll wait until the new cards this year to see how big the gap will be. Nice video
I think Dawid is competing with Rich from Digital Foundry for the most hand movements in a video. I love it!!
Great work Dawid, enjoying your channel!
Thank you for making the effort with this video. You answered my question of the last couple of weeks, which card to buy in the nearest future. I was going to build the system this year, and now I know I should definitely wait for next gen as it's not worth the money right now. Performance per dollar of this cards is going to drop fast as I see and they aren't as future proof as they should. Hope next gen will fix it and it wont be such headache to choose a card 😅
I got a pc with a i7 4790k, 32gb ram running at 2133ish mhz, paired with gtx 1080, and it works just fine for me, the only ''problem'' if I can even call it that is that newer games doesn't run at stable 120+ fps at all times and makes me notice the dips in framerate due to my monitor being a 1080p 144hz one, that I don't really have a plan on changing till it eventually dies or when I've actually got a upgraded rig that makes the monitor ''ancient'' as if it were a 4:3 1024x768 crt or something along the line. The thing is whenever games run at under stable 90fps or higher, it feels choppy with a 144hz monitor just due to it being more noticable on it than if you were running the same game on a 60hz monitor.
Great video! It’s funny I came across your video I just bought this very same model 2080 super yet to install it. I currently have a EVGA 2070 xc ultra non super and it’s a great card. Was going to get the 2070 super for a second pc but the jump was not that much and the 2080 super is close to a 1080ti. I think it will last for at least 3 to 5 years with spending a ridiculous amount on the 2080ti.
Love the tech deals info you use, definitely a right person to learn from
Dude you are quite literally using my exact setup, except I crammed it into an itx case and I have 32 gigs of RAM. But hey! Good to know what I can get when I decide to leave the 1080p life.