Control Body Odor ANYWHERE with @shop.mando and get $5 off off your Starter Pack (that’s over 40% off) with promo code BADD at ShopMando.com This was interesting. What was your reaction? Did this meet your expectations? Badd Medicine Arcade (Gaming channel) th-cam.com/channels/HIstVk00GtduPIXlJLdC3A.html Early Drops & Full Reactions on YT Memberships & Patreon: www.patreon.com/baddmedicine Backup channel Subscribe here th-cam.com/channels/1CLUwA27dz-94o3FR0o3xg.html
You guys have to remember that this is not the same as the original, this is based on the book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. The older film was called “Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory” and while it had SOME similarities to the original story, it was created by Gene Wilder and despised by Roald Dahl. This film though follows the book, even the words of the Oompa Loompa songs.
@@IgnarXela And on top of that, the script written for the Wilder film was NOT the one Dahl wrote. The producers practically chucked the entire script **he'd** given them and turned it into what basically amounted to an hour-long commercial with songs thrown in. iirc Dahl even tried to get his name pulled from the credits, though he was sadly unsuccessful.
The reason Willy winks in this one was so weird was because they wanted accurately represent someone who hasn’t interacted with people for 20 or so years
Also because Johnny Depp and the creators wanted to put a different spin on the character knowing if they didn't, people would compare it to Gene Wilder too much
@@ashhabimran239 but the different spin is just portraying the character closer to the book. Wilder changed everything about Wonka, down to editing the script to fit what he wanted to play lol
The touching moment where Charlie sees Willy's dad has all the news articles and stuff from watching Willy become a success was actually based on what happened between Tim Burton and his mother. They didn't have a good relationship, but towards the end of her life, Burton went to visit her and saw she had framed posters from all of his films
For context, Roald Dahl _hated_ the original, he said they took his story and made it much too saccharine, which is a wild thing to say when the story is about candy. This kept the spirit of the original, it was only greenlit when Dahl's widow saw they had modeled Charlie's house after Roald's old dilapidated writing shack.
Not that wild, because if you think about it, this story has dark undertones, being a story about candy is more of a facade. 5 kids go to a chocolate factory where 4 of them are put in traumatising, life-threatening situations, and the owner sadistically doesn't care and it's even implied it was all planned. More of a Roald Dahl style, the unique sense of creepiness, which this movie rolled with. This movie even traumatised my kid self
The thing about Dahl's stories is that they're whimsical on the surface but are very dark underneath, like Matilda or the Witches, so the original movie is indeed too mainstream happy.
And the part with Willie's father was based off of Tim Burton's relationship with his mother. They had a falling out, but near the end of her life, he visited her only to learn that she had kept posters of all of his movies.
He defines what an actor should be to me. His characters are so unique. Wonka is so very different than Edward Scissorhands and Capt Jack. I don't see Johnny Depp acting like Wonka; I feel like I'm actually watching Willy Wonka.
Those squirrels are real. An animal trainer named Michael Alexander spent 19 weeks training 40 rescue squirrels to open nuts. If it got past the health department, you could actually use squirrels to open nuts and seperate the nut from the shell at a factory level.
Grandpa George is such a real one in this movie, compared to the original where he had no lines. I'm glad that this movie gave each grandparent a clear personality
He’s definitely improved in this version. Grandpa Joe came across as a lot more selfish in the Wilder, but in this one he just seems happy that Charlie is getting a chance to have fun.
One of many things I prefer about this movie, the other grandparents have character and personality, unlike the original where they contributed literally NOTHING
@@gabrielhagedorn5942 This one is more warm and likeable in general, and has good reason to come along, being a former worker and really loving to see the place again. Unlike the first Joe where it felt unearned and he had an off personality
51:30 About that, Tim Burton actually asked the crew to NOT watch the 1971 version before production was done so they wouldn't be influenced by it in any way while making this version
it kinda broke me when Willy met his dad. Specifically the awkward hug. Cuz they somehow reconciled, somehow they wanted to show they cared, so they both tried to give each other a hug, but NEITHER OF THEM KNEW HOW TO HUG. They are there, a bit confused, a bit embarassed, and somehow manage to hug... but the instant they realise they DIDNT KNOW how to hug is prett heartbreaking. At the end Willy receives the hug from the granny, and it seems he has become used to receiving hugs, so... nice :)
Tim Burton had already worked closely with Roald Dahl's widow on James and the Giant Peach. Which is why she had far more trust in him when it came to the remake of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
fun fact: mike teavee, when willy wonka said he cracked the code is "He proves to be both scientifically and economically literate: he finds his Golden Ticket by taking the derivative of the Nikkei Index and analyzing the date codes of the other ticket finds, offsetting them by the weather that day, and then calculating the location of the next ticket, thus requiring him to purchase only a single Wonka Bar". I don’t believe Mike discussed how he finds the ticket in the book I believe that plot point only came in the 2005 film. The decision to make Mike an angry but brilliant techno nerd appears to have been taken by the 2005 film's writer John August and is an original creation for the Tim Burton film. Given that we're shown his obsession with video gaming, it's reasonable to assume that he saw locating the ticket as an intellectual challenge on a par with the sorts of puzzles you get in computer games and nothing more.
Deep Roy who played the Oompa Loompa's had more screen time than all the other actors combined because Tim Burton had him do EVERY Oompa Loompa individually. If the scene had 10 Oompa Loompas they would do take after take of him in each position the one would be. It is an incredibly impressive feat.
Man, gotta love Depp's versatility as an actor, especially having just yesterday re-watched Once Upon A Time In Mexico and now this. Gosh darn chameleon. (Just like in Rango)
Wow that's crazy because I just re-watched Once Upon A Time In Mexico yesterday too. What are the odds that two strangers watch the same film on the same day lmao
@@xackwerley9184 it's solidly one of the top 10 westerns of our time if not mostly for Rattlesnake Jake, it was an immaculate deconstruction of Western and in a PG CG kids movie to boot- criminally underrated!
Fun fact: Roald Dahl actually hated the Gene Wilder version as it strayed so far from his book. Tim Burton had the help from Dahl's wife in creating this version, something Roald Dahl would be happy with. Also another thing is that Johnny Depp came up with his Willy Wonka character by mixing together a creepy children's tv show host and George Bush if he was stoned.. He went to Tim with the voice and Tim was like "wow...... Wow...." Pretty much speechless haha
Fun fact: johnny depp and helena bonham carter after filming scenes for this movie would then go onto record their lines for another movie corpse bride so during this time the two were quite busy
The book was titled "Charlie and..." but Quaker Oats, who financed the original movie, was planning to launch a Wonka candy line so they changed the title to "Willy Wonka and..." The candy line didn't work out btw.
@@sevenseas4520just looked it up and apparently nestle sold their wonka brand candy to a company called ferrera in 2018. nerds, laffy taffy, and all the other wonka candy seem to be made by them now. it doesnt look like they even use the wonka label on them anymore though
I feel like they would’ve enjoyed this more if they weren’t so obsessed with comparing it to the Gene film. That’s not the original the book is and this film was closer to that, that’s why it’s very loved. They’re such separate films.
This movie never tried to be the Gene Wilder version, it leaned into being the *book version* more. I love this one far more than the original. Also given Charlie having both parents in this one, too.
I prefer this one just knowing how much Roald Dahl hated the original. Don't get me wrong the original is still special to me because my dad would go around the house singing "I've got a golden ticket!" in an operatic voice
@taylorwalton9774 I LOVE YOU!! So many people say it's corny and stuff but I watched it a couple years ago and LOVED EVERY SECOND (Weeeeellll.... except the part where the villain talks about his "adventures" with women overseas 💀)
This may sound weird, but I feel like the child actors are actually too good in this movie. They feel like real bratty kids in that I don't love to hate them. I just hate them. Simultaneously, I can't enjoy seeing them get their comeuppances because they feel too much like real, scared, vulnerable children, however bratty.
Indeed, they nailed the performances this movie, the kids (minus Charlie) are rotten like they should be, and they're generally more developed and interesting characters anyway, and they're demises are way more disturbing and discomforting than the previous movie
@@ashhabimran239 Did you actually read my comment? Because you began by saying you agreed with me then you disagreed with me. (BTW, a demise means a death and none of the kid characters die.)
The superior version, I love the fantastical/whimsy yet almost dark nature of it. Also despite the use of cgi most of the sets, including the main river room, were actually fully built.
Y'all keep calling the 1971 adaption "the original", but they're both adaptions of the book. This is not an adaption of the 1971 version, it's exactly as "original" as 1971 adaption was - based off a book. I love Johnny Depp's funny and weird portrayal of Wonka. It's not as creepy or scary as Wilder's.
Nope, the "original" was LOOSELY based on the book. the producers literally threw out the script that Dahl wrote, and even Gene Wilder, as much as a like him, didn't try to be wonka, he was acting as himself. Dahl, hated the first movie so much he wanted his name erased from it, but failed. Tim burton's version actually was in collaboration with Dahl's wife. @@marktracy1721
@@marktracy1721 It's still not "the original" because this isn't a remake. The Gene Wilder adaptation of the book wasn't even accurate to the book to the point that the books author despised the film and the casting of Gene Wilder
I would love to see you guys react to the Tim Burton Alice in Wonderland movies! This version has a separate and loved place in my heart just like the older version. I grew up reading Dahl's books and immediately loved the dark whimsy of this version. Not to mention the fact that every time you see an Oompa Loompa, Deep Roy had to film that! He did all of the dancing and movements and none of them were copy/pasted.
Fun fact, the squirrels were mostly real! They trained a few squirrels for that scene, and had the walnuts mounted on sticks. People holding the other end of the sticks were making the walnuts move, and since the squirrels had their paws on the nuts, after removing the sticks in post production it looked like the squirrels were moving the nuts around. I think it was enhanced with CGI at least some parts of it) but there were real squirrels there!
The cool thing about the room with the chocolate river is it’s almost entirely practical. Tim Burton was dead set on having as little cgi as possible. You see the same thing again with the squirrels, and every shot of the Oompa Loompas is Deep Roy acting out a separate take.
I just love this version of Willy wonka. Tim burton and Johnny Depp is the most wholesome duo in cinematic history. I recommend you also watch Johnny Depp in finding neverland where he does a dramatic role so different to what he is used to. He is just so versatile. But mostly I would like to see a Sweeney Todd reaction, It’s just a masterpiece of Tim burton, Johnny Depp, Helena bonham carter and Alan rickman❤
Adore this film. Was looking forward to this, bit of a let down how they were more concerned with the 70s version and talked about that more. Roald hated that version for being inaccurate and creepy, I love that Tim was so respectful to Roald’s memory and made it so close to the book. Johnny was a perfect Willy Wonka. Also the squirrels were real, a dude spent weeks training them all.
you mean accurately portraying the character from the books, instead of twisting him into an almost inrecognizable caricature of the character that even the author of the books hated? i suppose so.... seriously gene, does not fit the character as presented by the book at all. depp's performance is a 100 times more accurate and faithful to what the character is supposed to be like.
@@thechatteringclown If he was meant to be portrayed as awkward and quirky because of his lack of parents growing up, but still an adorable and a little weird dork, then Johnny Depp did it perfectly.
@@thechatteringclown Yeah my take is one from someone who's only seen the movies and didn't know much about the BTS situation(s). Glad they more closely followed the books! Depp killed it
Yeah. Original implies that this movie is an adaptation of the first movie. When really it's an adaptation of the book that's just more accurate to the book, so it will have differences.
It’s important to note that this movie is a direct interpretation of the book, not a remake of the movie. Tom Burton even told the staff not to watch the original movie so they don’t draw any inspiration from it. He wanted to stay as truthful to the book as possible
Depp can go from captain Jack to willy wonka with such ease it's incredible I love this movie and I don't get why old gen fans hate it it's really not fair just because they are nostalgia blinded
Right! I know quite a few people prefer Wilder to Depp, but I honestly liked Depp's version of Wonka better. Telling people to stop mumbling when you don't care for what they are saying is gold 😁
@@latishabuckner8231 not only that Wilder went out of his way to critisice Depp's performance and say it wasn't a good Wonka even though Wilder's wonka is nothing lithe the book and even Rahld himself and hated the performance he wanted an actor who was more comedic to play Willy and guess what Depp played Sparrow so he had that charm already while Wilder played Dr Frankenstien which is pyschopathic and nothing like Wonka from the book
It was so unique to me to see Johnny Depp playing Willy Wonka, and he put his foot in the role, he and everybody did a great job in this movie. I remember seeing commercials of it, back in the day when I was in first grade, then I get to see it for the first time when made reruns of the 2005 version. Hope you guys love it 😊
Can you react to "Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron"? It's a story about a strong, beautiful horse with a spirit that can never be broken. I cry every time i watch it! It's a INCREDIBLE film, and the songs are so cool! But it's not a musical and the animals can't talk. 😭💔🔥
Literally so underrated. Barley any dialogue and yet said so much! One of my all time favorites! The soundtrack was up to par with Phil Collins Tarzan soundtrack, Bryan Addams killed it!
Yes nd I watched this movie when I was just a child wid my mother who doesn’t even understand english ..she was just watching the visuals nd I think understood the movie it was that beautiful😊
I actually love this movie because it was more closer to the book. Plus, I love Tim Burton's filmmaking style which makes it even better, in my opinion.
The original had Dahl credited for the screenplay of the movie, but the creators changed a lot of what Dahl wrote. Also, the original was actually made as a commercial for a brand of Wonka candy. Dahl hated the original so much that he never allowed an adaptation of his books until he passed away. When he did pass away, his wife and daughter wanted to redeem Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and created this movie to be a perfect adaptation.
Would be so cool if you guys could react to Prince of Egypt! It's such a good movie with great animation and absolutely AMAZING songs and music by Hans Zimmer. It's a depiction of Moses' life but it is the one movie both religious and non religious people can agree is a masterpiece. Fun fact, it was made by Dreamworks and the people who messed up on it were sent to work on Shrek instead as punishment and they called it "getting Shreked".
Gonna go off on a whim, but out of the two Chocolate Factory films, this is my preferred one: - More book accurate - Better, more complete ending - More interesting characterisation (the original characters were really basic and flat) - Mr Bucket exists (and this raises the stakes when he loses his job) - Better grandparents (other 3 in the original might as well not have been in the movie) - Buckets actually feel like a tight-knit family - Excellent cinematography (compared to the dull execution of the first movie) - Cool atmosphere - Superb sets - Varied and catchy music (not the same copy-paste template) - Wonka’s backstory - Dahl hated the original movie (even said it was too sappy and saccharine) - More attention to detail - Was clearly a passion project instead of a commercial pretending to be a movie - Poetic in some areas - Better at showing instead of telling
It’s already been mentioned, but this is much closer to the book. For me, it’s just too weird; however, after reading some Dahl as an adult…yeah. Weird makes sense.
this movie unfortuanetly gets a lot of hate, simply because most people don't do proper research and don't realize that it's not "a remake" and has nothing to do with the 1971 movie. in fact, during production of this movie everyone involved was strictly forbidden from watching the 1971 movie, so as to not get influced by it. charlie and the chocolate factory, just like the 1971 willy wonka movie before it are both seperate and completely unrelated adaptations of the same source material, the 1969 book of the same name. only this version actually follows the book and correctly portrays the characters accurately to how they are presented in the book (minus the whole wonka's dad being a dentist narrative they added), unlike the 1971 movie, which completely bastardized wonka's character, as well as grandpa joe's. even the original author of the book hated the 1971 movie and how much it deviated from the book, calling the whole thing "too saccharine, sappy and sentimental". he especially hated gene and his portrayal of wonka and how inaccurat it was to wonka's personality in the book. and honestly, i can't help but to agree, simply seeing as how bad the reception to this movie was, because of the stain gene and the 1971 left on the franchise.
Fun Fact: People get pissy that Tim Burton told everyone NOT to watch the 1971 movie for reference, thou the reason is coz Tim Burton wanted to make this movie CLOSER to the book. For those who don't know the OG 1971 movie is only very loosley based on the book, roughly 35% of the book in movie and in the book, no villain it was added at the last minute to 1971 movie. This movie, is much, much closer, with a ratio closer to 70% adaptation from the book. In that light these movies MUST be viewed separately, but people won't and thus this movie gets shit on when it's not deserved.
So as I'm sure a hundred people have already told you by now, this one better represents the book. In my opinion while it doesn't hold the same charm and build up as the 1971 film, it is still enjoyable in its own right. Half the humor misses, but the rest I found myself laughing to. Also the Mike TV song is my favorite oompa loompa song in either movie, so high marks for that one.
I was challenged by a teacher in the 5th grade to read the whole book in a day. I don’t even remember what my prize was when I did it, but I remember the “up and out” chapter from the book so distinctly. Weird thing about me: I always say “up and out” when I have a door lock that is vertical when it’s unlocked. 😂
As said before this film was more accurate to the original book. The golden eggs, heavy lifting drinks, the horror part in the tunnel were all added in the original. The backstory with Wonkas father wasn’t in the book but added into the film.
I’ve always loved Johnny Depp as Willy Wonka and liked this version more in general, so to know Roald Dahl’s family approved and actually likes this version makes it all more special
An interesting fact is that the person casted for the Ompa lumpa is one of the highest paid actors in the whole movie due to the amount of work he had to do, he literally acted as everyone of his replica by shooting again and again physically- none of the visuals of him are computer generated.
I love how similar, yet totally different the two movies are (the 1971 film and the 2005 Tim Burton). Enjoyed your reaction as always! There are some FUN quotes in this one that I’ve used with friends even today, we know it comes directly from THIS version!
it's important to note this is not a remake of the old movie, this is another adaptation of the book (itd be like saying the Percy Jackson tv series is a remake of the movie), and the Tim Burton one is way more faithful to the book. I mean, literally the Gene wilder one didn't even get the title right also, I'm just gonna say it, the old movie's choice to remove Veruca via golden eggs was stupid af, because the point of her being taken out by the squirrels in the nut room, is because what does her father do as a job? Runs a nut company. It's poetic justice. The thing that made her spoiled is what disqualifies her
I love that Oak asks if we are supposed "to be under the influence " when we watch this movie, but yet i dont think he asked that during Wilder's Willy Wonka.... so my question would be are we just supposed to be under the influence w any of Burton/Depp colabs?? Cause i find myself asking that every time. lol😂😂
I once re-watched this after a break up, and my friend was shocked because she thought it was too dark. Whereas i found that, and the sarcasm, hysterical! Nothing about Willie's father was in the book, but i actually enjoyed that addition. And the book did use squirrels not geese, no idea why the first one changed that.
God i love some of the characters Johnny Depp plays 😄 nice way to get in the mood to watch the new Wonka movie too. I also remember watching the original movie when i was a kid and would randomly get nightmares from the oompa loompa's lol 😅
When little Willy says that he will go to Switzerland, to where they make the best chocolate in the world, it’s funny to say because they don’t produce ANY cocoa beans, they get it all from Brazil, Ecuador or Ghana and Ivory Coast
I remember everyone hating this when it came out. As times passed, I think everyone feels kinder to it. Especially since it’s come out that it’s truer to the source material .
I believe the pink sheep scene was an inside joke, due to the fact that Johnny Depp and Tim Burton also did 1994's "Ed Wood." Depp played Wood, the film director who wrote, produced, directed and edited what is called the worst film ever made ("Plan 9 From Outer Space") and also cross-dressed, his favorite clothing item being pink angora sweaters.
I love this version it is just so good and funny. I also love how more heavily based on the book it is, and the scene with the squirrels. They actually had real trained squirrels in this film. I'd love to see how u guys react to Mike Myers Cat In The Hat film just because of how u reacted to this
05:01 "What Is It, Charlie?" 07:16 "I'm Closing My Chocolate Factory Forever." 07:30 "Did You Get Your Hoh Back?" 08:40 "Dear People Of The World, I, Willy Wonka, Have Decided To Allowe Five Children To Visit." 09:00 "He Doesn't Have A Change." 09:17 "I Eating Some Wonka Bar." 09:19 "I Find Ze Golden Ticket." 09:49 "I'm In The Nut Business, You See." 10:04 "I Want My Golden Ticket." 10:25 "Daddy, I Want Another Pony." 10:45 "Maybe I Should Wait Till Morning.' 11:18 "We'll Share It." 11:51 "I'm A Gum Chewer, Mostly!" 11:55 "Because I'm A Winner." 12:25 "D13, D13, D13." 12:31 "I H4t3 Chocolate." 12:35 "YUL." 14:08 "Did You See That Some Kin In Russia Found The Last Golden Ticket?" 14:33 "One Wonka Whipple-Scrumptins Fudgemallow Delight, Please." 15:21 "Yippee!" 17:09 "Please Enter."
This movie influenced language for a couple years. People were always saying, “Good morning starshine, the Earth says hello!” and shouting out “Mumbler!” I also used to constantly mimic that silly little nervous laugh Wonka did. So it was iconic for a few years, but now it’s mostly forgotten and doesn’t have the long-lasting memes and cultural impact of the OG movie. Still a great movie though.
Fun Fact: "Good morning starshine/The Earth says hello" is actually a quote. It's a lyric from the song "Good Morning Starshine" from the musical "Hair". It's got a lot of nonsensical parts to it, so it fits quite well.
Personally when I am comparing “remakes/retellings/new spin” I generally go by what I would rewatch the most. If it has more rewatchability then I tend to feel like that is the better film 🤷🏻♂️
i love this version the best! freddie highmore as charlie is perfect! you all should check out August Rush, one of my favorites has Freddie, Terrence Howard, Keri Russell and Robin Williams 👏🏽💕
Like you saw in the notes after watching the movie, Roald Dalh absolutely hated the first one, and especially Gene Wilder's portrayal of Willy Wonka, which is why he refused to let anyone turn his book into a movie again while he was alive. This one is closer to the book and his widow said that Roald Dahl would have liked Johnny Depp's portrayal much better. At the end of the day though, it's a matter of taste. I really wish we coul erase your memory and make you watch this one first then the original, and see how your opinion might differ (or not) at the end. It feels like those who watched the original first tend to like that one better, and those who saw this one first tend to like this one better. I guess it also depends on which one you grew up with!
16:05 the one exact point I make when talking economics: "Money can be printed overnight. You want money? Stuff yourself up with it. As long as you don't ask for solutions, you'll still be poor."
I never watched the original movie. This one really freaked me out, I couldn't see where it was going, and I was fully convinced, at any point now Wonka will kill all these children. "It's gonna be a horror movie, trust..."
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
Control Body Odor ANYWHERE with @shop.mando and get $5 off off your Starter Pack (that’s over 40% off) with promo code BADD at ShopMando.com
This was interesting. What was your reaction? Did this meet your expectations?
Badd Medicine Arcade (Gaming channel) th-cam.com/channels/HIstVk00GtduPIXlJLdC3A.html
Early Drops & Full Reactions on YT Memberships & Patreon: www.patreon.com/baddmedicine
Backup channel Subscribe here th-cam.com/channels/1CLUwA27dz-94o3FR0o3xg.html
You guys have to remember that this is not the same as the original, this is based on the book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. The older film was called “Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory” and while it had SOME similarities to the original story, it was created by Gene Wilder and despised by Roald Dahl. This film though follows the book, even the words of the Oompa Loompa songs.
Could you react to Sleepy Hollow With Johnny Depp.
Its a great movie. Every Year on Halloween i Watch it
Love y'all from Menasha!
@@torinkyifh5085 hello neighbor
Heeey, where can I send recommendations to you guys? Cause I really think you should watch 2010's Tron: Legacy, a very underrated movie in my opinion.
This movie was more directly inspired by the book and had the approval of Dahl's family. Dahl hated the first Willy Wonka movie.
It was also said that Gene modified scenes to fit what he wanted vs what was in the script.
Sonic and the Black Knight mentioned 😫💥💥💥💥
i’m pretty sure he hated it and gene because he was a known antisemite
@@paradoxx0468 ❤
@@IgnarXela And on top of that, the script written for the Wilder film was NOT the one Dahl wrote. The producers practically chucked the entire script **he'd** given them and turned it into what basically amounted to an hour-long commercial with songs thrown in. iirc Dahl even tried to get his name pulled from the credits, though he was sadly unsuccessful.
The reason Willy winks in this one was so weird was because they wanted accurately represent someone who hasn’t interacted with people for 20 or so years
i know it was probably auto correct but "willy winks" made me laugh so hard
Who would've thought that a person who's name literally comes from the word 'wonky' would have a strange personality?
Also because Johnny Depp and the creators wanted to put a different spin on the character knowing if they didn't, people would compare it to Gene Wilder too much
@@Mimoo7Seriously, we need to ban all auto-corrects on smartphone keyboards
@@ashhabimran239 but the different spin is just portraying the character closer to the book. Wilder changed everything about Wonka, down to editing the script to fit what he wanted to play lol
The touching moment where Charlie sees Willy's dad has all the news articles and stuff from watching Willy become a success was actually based on what happened between Tim Burton and his mother. They didn't have a good relationship, but towards the end of her life, Burton went to visit her and saw she had framed posters from all of his films
Wow I love that it was included
That makes it more wholesome ❤
Reminds me of Queen's Gambit.
Damn that'd be so wholesome
If I remember correctly, she also had a scrapbook of reviews for his movies.
For context, Roald Dahl _hated_ the original, he said they took his story and made it much too saccharine, which is a wild thing to say when the story is about candy. This kept the spirit of the original, it was only greenlit when Dahl's widow saw they had modeled Charlie's house after Roald's old dilapidated writing shack.
Not that wild, because if you think about it, this story has dark undertones, being a story about candy is more of a facade. 5 kids go to a chocolate factory where 4 of them are put in traumatising, life-threatening situations, and the owner sadistically doesn't care and it's even implied it was all planned. More of a Roald Dahl style, the unique sense of creepiness, which this movie rolled with. This movie even traumatised my kid self
The thing about Dahl's stories is that they're whimsical on the surface but are very dark underneath, like Matilda or the Witches, so the original movie is indeed too mainstream happy.
And the part with Willie's father was based off of Tim Burton's relationship with his mother. They had a falling out, but near the end of her life, he visited her only to learn that she had kept posters of all of his movies.
It's honestly beyond me on how Johnny Depp gave us so many iconic characters and showed his versatility yet no oscar..
He's got a jar of dirt, he'll be fine.
He defines what an actor should be to me. His characters are so unique. Wonka is so very different than Edward Scissorhands and Capt Jack. I don't see Johnny Depp acting like Wonka; I feel like I'm actually watching Willy Wonka.
All of it is better than the performance that his ex gave in that courtroom.
@@DrVVVinK 🤣😂🤣💯
That's because he doesn't go to the weekly Epsteins island tours
Those squirrels are real. An animal trainer named Michael Alexander spent 19 weeks training 40 rescue squirrels to open nuts. If it got past the health department, you could actually use squirrels to open nuts and seperate the nut from the shell at a factory level.
That'd be so fucked up😂
@TheRealBillix Why would it though? :D I mean in general animals enjoy being worked for rewards, it would even be good for the environment hahah
@@zardify_ because we can build machines.. you wouldn’t make a dog into a weapon now would you :D
@@TheRealBillix Police K-9 and Michael Vick enter a room...
@TheRealBillix weapons are a different thing tho, but they do with police and military doggos
Grandpa George is such a real one in this movie, compared to the original where he had no lines. I'm glad that this movie gave each grandparent a clear personality
I’ve always wondered if Grandpa George was supposed to represent Dahl himself. Certainly looked a lot like him.
He’s definitely improved in this version. Grandpa Joe came across as a lot more selfish in the Wilder, but in this one he just seems happy that Charlie is getting a chance to have fun.
Dragonflies?
One of many things I prefer about this movie, the other grandparents have character and personality, unlike the original where they contributed literally NOTHING
@@gabrielhagedorn5942 This one is more warm and likeable in general, and has good reason to come along, being a former worker and really loving to see the place again. Unlike the first Joe where it felt unearned and he had an off personality
"Good morning starshine, the Earth says hello!"
Down to here, down to there, down to where it stops by itself ❤
I say this at least 3 times a month 🥰
Man Johnny Depp is fantastic 😁
@@ThwipThwipBoom It's from a musical called Hair. Really cool film.
😂 in the theeee most awkward voice 😂
51:30 About that, Tim Burton actually asked the crew to NOT watch the 1971 version before production was done so they wouldn't be influenced by it in any way while making this version
Wow, he doesn't do half of the things
@@a.g.demada5263 ?
This isnt a remake of the old film. This is a totally different adaptation of the story. It has nothing to do with the old one.
this is just straight up from the book..the old one had to deal with so much contrversy on that time
@@ajirizawa5743
U say that as if this one didnt either .
@gabiwolf1439 this is Willy Wonka...not telletubies
@@ajirizawa5743 Not completely. The Fizzy Lifting Drinks scene is missing. Also, the movie incorporated elements of Charlie and the Glass Elevator.
it kinda broke me when Willy met his dad. Specifically the awkward hug. Cuz they somehow reconciled, somehow they wanted to show they cared, so they both tried to give each other a hug, but NEITHER OF THEM KNEW HOW TO HUG. They are there, a bit confused, a bit embarassed, and somehow manage to hug... but the instant they realise they DIDNT KNOW how to hug is prett heartbreaking. At the end Willy receives the hug from the granny, and it seems he has become used to receiving hugs, so... nice :)
I like that they're both wearing the same kind of coat and rubber gloves, that despite going into candy, Wonka still grew up like his dad in a way.
Tim Burton had already worked closely with Roald Dahl's widow on James and the Giant Peach. Which is why she had far more trust in him when it came to the remake of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
ohhh you're right he did do James and the Giant peach!! Never knew his widow worked with him together on this
@@mrsfahrenheit He didn't direct it, he only served as a producer on it
@@ethanhart129 ohhh thanks. Was it Henry Sellik then?
fun fact: mike teavee, when willy wonka said he cracked the code is "He proves to be both scientifically and economically literate: he finds his Golden Ticket by taking the derivative of the Nikkei Index and analyzing the date codes of the other ticket finds, offsetting them by the weather that day, and then calculating the location of the next ticket, thus requiring him to purchase only a single Wonka Bar". I don’t believe Mike discussed how he finds the ticket in the book I believe that plot point only came in the 2005 film. The decision to make Mike an angry but brilliant techno nerd appears to have been taken by the 2005 film's writer John August and is an original creation for the Tim Burton film. Given that we're shown his obsession with video gaming, it's reasonable to assume that he saw locating the ticket as an intellectual challenge on a par with the sorts of puzzles you get in computer games and nothing more.
The Wonka bars are distributed all over the globe, literally every continent, and yet somehow all 5 tickets ended up in the U.S and Europe 😭
the world tour of great artists be like:
just like how aliens only invade the U.S. (Willy Wonka is an alien??)
not to rain on your parade but that’s how the real world works as well
Then you should of Brought sum🤪
@@Salty_Nutella🤣
I'm waiting for Badd Medicine's Studio Ghibli reaction era😌😏
Fr fr😊
yesss!!
Yeah! Totally. They got to start with Spirited Away
bro pleaseeeee 🌝🙏🏻
❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉
Deep Roy who played the Oompa Loompa's had more screen time than all the other actors combined because Tim Burton had him do EVERY Oompa Loompa individually. If the scene had 10 Oompa Loompas they would do take after take of him in each position the one would be. It is an incredibly impressive feat.
I was just thinking this seeing the behind the scenes. Honestly very impressive
My experience with this movie is "Man, all the songs was a banger"
*were
*Who
*WHY IS GAMORA
they were directly taken from the book
Different songs with actual variety, styles and genre to reflect the kids
Man, gotta love Depp's versatility as an actor, especially having just yesterday re-watched Once Upon A Time In Mexico and now this. Gosh darn chameleon. (Just like in Rango)
He's incredible, the way he changed his voice for this role always astounds me when you listen to his normal voice
Wow that's crazy because I just re-watched Once Upon A Time In Mexico yesterday too. What are the odds that two strangers watch the same film on the same day lmao
Un-ironically Rango is one of my favorite Johnny Depp movies
@@xackwerley9184 it's solidly one of the top 10 westerns of our time
if not mostly for Rattlesnake Jake, it was an immaculate deconstruction of Western and in a PG CG kids movie to boot- criminally underrated!
Fun fact: Roald Dahl actually hated the Gene Wilder version as it strayed so far from his book. Tim Burton had the help from Dahl's wife in creating this version, something Roald Dahl would be happy with. Also another thing is that Johnny Depp came up with his Willy Wonka character by mixing together a creepy children's tv show host and George Bush if he was stoned.. He went to Tim with the voice and Tim was like "wow...... Wow...." Pretty much speechless haha
Fun fact: johnny depp and helena bonham carter after filming scenes for this movie would then go onto record their lines for another movie corpse bride so during this time the two were quite busy
She looks so different and is so subdued in this movie i always forget its her 😂. I was like wait who was she in this again lol
My personal opinion this one is my favorite one of all them 3 versions.
Childhood memories
Tbh I pretend the new Willy Wonka does not exist lol
@@Beatriz_ceci it’s not a new Willy wonka tho. It’s a prequel
@@Beatriz_ceciit was a fun movie idk why people are trying to make it seem so bad. like lighten up a little
@@Daytondaily got worse.
@@zoew_ I didn't like it, and it's just my opinion.
The book was titled "Charlie and..." but Quaker Oats, who financed the original movie, was planning to launch a Wonka candy line so they changed the title to "Willy Wonka and..."
The candy line didn't work out btw.
I still see Willy Wonka bars on pharmacy selves every easter.
@@billbill6094by Quaker Oats, or by a different company?
The line by Quaker wasn’t successful, but Nestle had (maybe they still do) a successful line
@@sevenseas4520I don’t know who made it but I remember seeing wonka bars all the time and they were awesome 😌
@@sevenseas4520just looked it up and apparently nestle sold their wonka brand candy to a company called ferrera in 2018. nerds, laffy taffy, and all the other wonka candy seem to be made by them now. it doesnt look like they even use the wonka label on them anymore though
I feel like they would’ve enjoyed this more if they weren’t so obsessed with comparing it to the Gene film. That’s not the original the book is and this film was closer to that, that’s why it’s very loved. They’re such separate films.
This movie never tried to be the Gene Wilder version, it leaned into being the *book version* more. I love this one far more than the original. Also given Charlie having both parents in this one, too.
Fully agree
"Don't touch the squirrels nuts, he'll get very angry" 😂
- Willy Wonka 2005
31:04 😂
Don’t care what anyone says, I love this one. And good catch by Oak, that is the girl from Gen V
I prefer this one just knowing how much Roald Dahl hated the original. Don't get me wrong the original is still special to me because my dad would go around the house singing "I've got a golden ticket!" in an operatic voice
@@marahbaker8615yeah same. I like the original but after having read the book I can say I do prefer this one lol
@@marahbaker8615 Lmao so you like this one more because just because the writer was butthurt about the other one?
I always preferred this one, personally. But when I found out about how Dahl felt about the original movie, it reinforced my opinion lol
@@MamadNobarinot that many people think the original is way better by any means lmao
Man, PLEASE watch Sweeney Todd: Demon Barber with Johnny Depp!! That movie is a hidden gem, good music and dark humor all throughout.
That’s my favorite Johnny Depp movie of all time!
I need to watch that
@taylorwalton9774 I LOVE YOU!! So many people say it's corny and stuff but I watched it a couple years ago and LOVED EVERY SECOND
(Weeeeellll.... except the part where the villain talks about his "adventures" with women overseas 💀)
Yess! That's easily one of my favorite movie musicals!
Oooooh yes please!
This was one of those movies I watched constantly as a kid, all the songs are ingrained in my brain lol
Me too
A rather different set of friends a rather different set of friends 😂 lives in my head rent free
I was in denial for so long that this is Johnny depp he looks and sounds so different 😂
This may sound weird, but I feel like the child actors are actually too good in this movie. They feel like real bratty kids in that I don't love to hate them. I just hate them. Simultaneously, I can't enjoy seeing them get their comeuppances because they feel too much like real, scared, vulnerable children, however bratty.
Indeed, they nailed the performances this movie, the kids (minus Charlie) are rotten like they should be, and they're generally more developed and interesting characters anyway, and they're demises are way more disturbing and discomforting than the previous movie
@@ashhabimran239 Did you actually read my comment? Because you began by saying you agreed with me then you disagreed with me. (BTW, a demise means a death and none of the kid characters die.)
The superior version, I love the fantastical/whimsy yet almost dark nature of it.
Also despite the use of cgi most of the sets, including the main river room, were actually fully built.
Superior version, must've watched Media Mementos's video. And yeah I full agree, I like this one far more too
Y'all keep calling the 1971 adaption "the original", but they're both adaptions of the book. This is not an adaption of the 1971 version, it's exactly as "original" as 1971 adaption was - based off a book.
I love Johnny Depp's funny and weird portrayal of Wonka. It's not as creepy or scary as Wilder's.
Cause it's the original movie
based on the book by.........
Nope, the "original" was LOOSELY based on the book. the producers literally threw out the script that Dahl wrote, and even Gene Wilder, as much as a like him, didn't try to be wonka, he was acting as himself.
Dahl, hated the first movie so much he wanted his name erased from it, but failed.
Tim burton's version actually was in collaboration with Dahl's wife.
@@marktracy1721
@@marktracy1721 It's still not "the original" because this isn't a remake. The Gene Wilder adaptation of the book wasn't even accurate to the book to the point that the books author despised the film and the casting of Gene Wilder
I would love to see you guys react to the Tim Burton Alice in Wonderland movies! This version has a separate and loved place in my heart just like the older version. I grew up reading Dahl's books and immediately loved the dark whimsy of this version. Not to mention the fact that every time you see an Oompa Loompa, Deep Roy had to film that! He did all of the dancing and movements and none of them were copy/pasted.
Fun fact, the squirrels were mostly real! They trained a few squirrels for that scene, and had the walnuts mounted on sticks. People holding the other end of the sticks were making the walnuts move, and since the squirrels had their paws on the nuts, after removing the sticks in post production it looked like the squirrels were moving the nuts around. I think it was enhanced with CGI at least some parts of it) but there were real squirrels there!
I'm sure those squirrels are just robots
@davomartico they're not! A guy came in to train them, you can look it up~
a clever mix of real squrrels, cgi, and animatronic ones.
Strange seeing Freddie Highmore as a young g boy . I am used to seeing him in The Good Doctor
He met Johnny Depp at first in the movie Finding Neverland.
Depp was so impressed by him so he wanted him as Charlie.
He had quite a few child roles, was nice seeing him then and now
First movie I saw him in was The Spiderwick Chronicles
I always see him as August Rush. Beautiful movie with wonderful music 😍
Depp was in charge of casting?@@ulricaandrae4381
The cool thing about the room with the chocolate river is it’s almost entirely practical. Tim Burton was dead set on having as little cgi as possible. You see the same thing again with the squirrels, and every shot of the Oompa Loompas is Deep Roy acting out a separate take.
I just love this version of Willy wonka. Tim burton and Johnny Depp is the most wholesome duo in cinematic history. I recommend you also watch Johnny Depp in finding neverland where he does a dramatic role so different to what he is used to. He is just so versatile.
But mostly I would like to see a Sweeney Todd reaction, It’s just a masterpiece of Tim burton, Johnny Depp, Helena bonham carter and Alan rickman❤
Yesss, Sweeney Todd would be great!!
Especially since they just watched Hamilton; Sondheim is one of the best.
Adore this film. Was looking forward to this, bit of a let down how they were more concerned with the 70s version and talked about that more. Roald hated that version for being inaccurate and creepy, I love that Tim was so respectful to Roald’s memory and made it so close to the book. Johnny was a perfect Willy Wonka. Also the squirrels were real, a dude spent weeks training them all.
Gene's is the classic, but Depp has such a unique take on the role that really made it his own
you mean accurately portraying the character from the books, instead of twisting him into an almost inrecognizable caricature of the character that even the author of the books hated? i suppose so....
seriously gene, does not fit the character as presented by the book at all. depp's performance is a 100 times more accurate and faithful to what the character is supposed to be like.
@@thechatteringclown yepppp
@@thechatteringclown If he was meant to be portrayed as awkward and quirky because of his lack of parents growing up, but still an adorable and a little weird dork, then Johnny Depp did it perfectly.
@thechatteringclown
If Depps is more accurate then the book is not for me. Love Genes take on it.
@@thechatteringclown Yeah my take is one from someone who's only seen the movies and didn't know much about the BTS situation(s). Glad they more closely followed the books! Depp killed it
I’m sure someone said it already but the Wilder version change the title to Willy Wonka. This went back to the og title.
Don't understand this thing of calling older versions "original". The newer ones aren't remakes. They are adaptations of the same book.
The original adaptation
yep, already seeing people in the comments wrongly labelling this as "remake".
Devil's Advocate 👋 Could it be considered the "Original" adaptation?
Original as in they were the first to make the adaptation from the book. It was the first movie, and therefore the original.
Yeah. Original implies that this movie is an adaptation of the first movie. When really it's an adaptation of the book that's just more accurate to the book, so it will have differences.
It’s important to note that this movie is a direct interpretation of the book, not a remake of the movie. Tom Burton even told the staff not to watch the original movie so they don’t draw any inspiration from it. He wanted to stay as truthful to the book as possible
Tim*
"As truthful as possible." Right. Except for all the weird dentist flashbacks. And most of Wonka's lines.
Depp can go from captain Jack to willy wonka with such ease it's incredible I love this movie and I don't get why old gen fans hate it it's really not fair just because they are nostalgia blinded
Right! I know quite a few people prefer Wilder to Depp, but I honestly liked Depp's version of Wonka better. Telling people to stop mumbling when you don't care for what they are saying is gold 😁
@@latishabuckner8231 not only that Wilder went out of his way to critisice Depp's performance and say it wasn't a good Wonka even though Wilder's wonka is nothing lithe the book and even Rahld himself and hated the performance he wanted an actor who was more comedic to play Willy and guess what Depp played Sparrow so he had that charm already while Wilder played Dr Frankenstien which is pyschopathic and nothing like Wonka from the book
I grew up with the original and love it but love Depps version just as much. But have enough differences to hold their own
It was so unique to me to see Johnny Depp playing Willy Wonka, and he put his foot in the role, he and everybody did a great job in this movie.
I remember seeing commercials of it, back in the day when I was in first grade, then I get to see it for the first time when made reruns of the 2005 version.
Hope you guys love it 😊
Depp is a genius actor. I kept looking for a trace of him in the affect, voice, physicality couldn't find him. EXTRAORDINARY!🎉❤🎉
This version is based more heavily on the book. The father storyline is different.
"You can use it everywhere....EVERYWHERE" 😂
Can you react to "Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron"? It's a story about a strong, beautiful horse with a spirit that can never be broken. I cry every time i watch it! It's a INCREDIBLE film, and the songs are so cool! But it's not a musical and the animals can't talk. 😭💔🔥
Literally so underrated. Barley any dialogue and yet said so much! One of my all time favorites! The soundtrack was up to par with Phil Collins Tarzan soundtrack, Bryan Addams killed it!
I just rewatched this movie. Loved it as a kid and still love it, soooo underrated
Boosting this comment Spirit is an absolutely amazing movie and would love to see these guys watch it
Okay that’s actually a fantastic movie.
Yes nd I watched this movie when I was just a child wid my mother who doesn’t even understand english ..she was just watching the visuals nd I think understood the movie it was that beautiful😊
Loved this version ! Johnny Depp is amazing!
I actually love this movie because it was more closer to the book. Plus, I love Tim Burton's filmmaking style which makes it even better, in my opinion.
The original had Dahl credited for the screenplay of the movie, but the creators changed a lot of what Dahl wrote. Also, the original was actually made as a commercial for a brand of Wonka candy. Dahl hated the original so much that he never allowed an adaptation of his books until he passed away. When he did pass away, his wife and daughter wanted to redeem Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and created this movie to be a perfect adaptation.
The Johnny depp one is my favorite
Would be so cool if you guys could react to Prince of Egypt! It's such a good movie with great animation and absolutely AMAZING songs and music by Hans Zimmer. It's a depiction of Moses' life but it is the one movie both religious and non religious people can agree is a masterpiece. Fun fact, it was made by Dreamworks and the people who messed up on it were sent to work on Shrek instead as punishment and they called it "getting Shreked".
Gonna go off on a whim, but out of the two Chocolate Factory films, this is my preferred one:
- More book accurate
- Better, more complete ending
- More interesting characterisation (the original characters were really basic and flat)
- Mr Bucket exists (and this raises the stakes when he loses his job)
- Better grandparents (other 3 in the original might as well not have been in the movie)
- Buckets actually feel like a tight-knit family
- Excellent cinematography (compared to the dull execution of the first movie)
- Cool atmosphere
- Superb sets
- Varied and catchy music (not the same copy-paste template)
- Wonka’s backstory
- Dahl hated the original movie (even said it was too sappy and saccharine)
- More attention to detail
- Was clearly a passion project instead of a commercial pretending to be a movie
- Poetic in some areas
- Better at showing instead of telling
One of my favorite childhood movies and this one is more accurate to the book.
You are absolutely right Appleton Oak, Shelley Conn who played the Princess here also plays Indira Shetty in Gen V
It’s already been mentioned, but this is much closer to the book. For me, it’s just too weird; however, after reading some Dahl as an adult…yeah. Weird makes sense.
this movie unfortuanetly gets a lot of hate, simply because most people don't do proper research and don't realize that it's not "a remake" and has nothing to do with the 1971 movie. in fact, during production of this movie everyone involved was strictly forbidden from watching the 1971 movie, so as to not get influced by it.
charlie and the chocolate factory, just like the 1971 willy wonka movie before it are both seperate and completely unrelated adaptations of the same source material, the 1969 book of the same name. only this version actually follows the book and correctly portrays the characters accurately to how they are presented in the book (minus the whole wonka's dad being a dentist narrative they added), unlike the 1971 movie, which completely bastardized wonka's character, as well as grandpa joe's.
even the original author of the book hated the 1971 movie and how much it deviated from the book, calling the whole thing "too saccharine, sappy and sentimental". he especially hated gene and his portrayal of wonka and how inaccurat it was to wonka's personality in the book.
and honestly, i can't help but to agree, simply seeing as how bad the reception to this movie was, because of the stain gene and the 1971 left on the franchise.
This is the adaptation I grew up watching
"Future endeavored"
Thats gotta be the nicest way I've heard that put.
Fun Fact: People get pissy that Tim Burton told everyone NOT to watch the 1971 movie for reference, thou the reason is coz Tim Burton wanted to make this movie CLOSER to the book. For those who don't know the OG 1971 movie is only very loosley based on the book, roughly 35% of the book in movie and in the book, no villain it was added at the last minute to 1971 movie.
This movie, is much, much closer, with a ratio closer to 70% adaptation from the book.
In that light these movies MUST be viewed separately, but people won't and thus this movie gets shit on when it's not deserved.
So as I'm sure a hundred people have already told you by now, this one better represents the book. In my opinion while it doesn't hold the same charm and build up as the 1971 film, it is still enjoyable in its own right. Half the humor misses, but the rest I found myself laughing to. Also the Mike TV song is my favorite oompa loompa song in either movie, so high marks for that one.
I was challenged by a teacher in the 5th grade to read the whole book in a day. I don’t even remember what my prize was when I did it, but I remember the “up and out” chapter from the book so distinctly.
Weird thing about me: I always say “up and out” when I have a door lock that is vertical when it’s unlocked. 😂
As said before this film was more accurate to the original book. The golden eggs, heavy lifting drinks, the horror part in the tunnel were all added in the original. The backstory with Wonkas father wasn’t in the book but added into the film.
It's crazy that you guys released your reaction to this movie today. Actor who plays grandpa Joe in this version passed away 12 years ago yesterday 😢
I’ve always loved Johnny Depp as Willy Wonka and liked this version more in general, so to know Roald Dahl’s family approved and actually likes this version makes it all more special
Dahl was a racist so enjoy putting him on a pedestal.
Charlie should hire the man who gave him 3rd Wonka Bar.
An interesting fact is that the person casted for the Ompa lumpa is one of the highest paid actors in the whole movie due to the amount of work he had to do, he literally acted as everyone of his replica by shooting again and again physically- none of the visuals of him are computer generated.
I remember watching this many times dancing and singing to the Oompa-Loompas songs and enjoying Johnny as Wonka.
The oompa loompa actor is legendary. He played one of the hobbits in Lord of the Rings. Quiet a remarkable man
I love how quick the switch happened from “I’m not diggin it” to “I’m hooked” lol
I love how similar, yet totally different the two movies are (the 1971 film and the 2005 Tim Burton). Enjoyed your reaction as always! There are some FUN quotes in this one that I’ve used with friends even today, we know it comes directly from THIS version!
I always loved how Christopher Lee said "Lollypops" in this scene ( 25:40 )
In the german dub they gave augustus a really think bavarian dialect because well you cant really do german accent in a german dub😂
it's important to note this is not a remake of the old movie, this is another adaptation of the book (itd be like saying the Percy Jackson tv series is a remake of the movie), and the Tim Burton one is way more faithful to the book. I mean, literally the Gene wilder one didn't even get the title right
also, I'm just gonna say it, the old movie's choice to remove Veruca via golden eggs was stupid af, because the point of her being taken out by the squirrels in the nut room, is because what does her father do as a job? Runs a nut company. It's poetic justice. The thing that made her spoiled is what disqualifies her
You've probably already been told but in the original film Wonka says "I'm a trifle deaf in this ear. Speak a little louder next time. " to Mike
I love that Oak asks if we are supposed "to be under the influence " when we watch this movie, but yet i dont think he asked that during Wilder's Willy Wonka.... so my question would be are we just supposed to be under the influence w any of Burton/Depp colabs?? Cause i find myself asking that every time. lol😂😂
I once re-watched this after a break up, and my friend was shocked because she thought it was too dark. Whereas i found that, and the sarcasm, hysterical!
Nothing about Willie's father was in the book, but i actually enjoyed that addition. And the book did use squirrels not geese, no idea why the first one changed that.
Once again, love whenever you guys have a sponsor!
God i love some of the characters Johnny Depp plays 😄 nice way to get in the mood to watch the new Wonka movie too.
I also remember watching the original movie when i was a kid and would randomly get nightmares from the oompa loompa's lol 😅
I don’t know if you guys have addressed watching the new Wonka movie, but I hope that’s what you guys are planning on, it was a fun watch
When little Willy says that he will go to Switzerland, to where they make the best chocolate in the world, it’s funny to say because they don’t produce ANY cocoa beans, they get it all from Brazil, Ecuador or Ghana and Ivory Coast
I remember everyone hating this when it came out. As times passed, I think everyone feels kinder to it. Especially since it’s come out that it’s truer to the source material .
You guys should watch the animated movie “Rango”, it’s another Johnny Depp movie and it’s absolutely golden! One of my favourites ever
I believe the pink sheep scene was an inside joke, due to the fact that Johnny Depp and Tim Burton also did 1994's "Ed Wood." Depp played Wood, the film director who wrote, produced, directed and edited what is called the worst film ever made ("Plan 9 From Outer Space") and also cross-dressed, his favorite clothing item being pink angora sweaters.
I love this version it is just so good and funny. I also love how more heavily based on the book it is, and the scene with the squirrels. They actually had real trained squirrels in this film. I'd love to see how u guys react to Mike Myers Cat In The Hat film just because of how u reacted to this
05:01 "What Is It, Charlie?"
07:16 "I'm Closing My Chocolate Factory Forever."
07:30 "Did You Get Your Hoh Back?"
08:40 "Dear People Of The World, I, Willy Wonka, Have Decided To Allowe Five Children To Visit."
09:00 "He Doesn't Have A Change."
09:17 "I Eating Some Wonka Bar."
09:19 "I Find Ze Golden Ticket."
09:49 "I'm In The Nut Business, You See."
10:04 "I Want My Golden Ticket."
10:25 "Daddy, I Want Another Pony."
10:45 "Maybe I Should Wait Till Morning.'
11:18 "We'll Share It."
11:51 "I'm A Gum Chewer, Mostly!"
11:55 "Because I'm A Winner."
12:25 "D13, D13, D13."
12:31 "I H4t3 Chocolate."
12:35 "YUL."
14:08 "Did You See That Some Kin In Russia Found The Last Golden Ticket?"
14:33 "One Wonka Whipple-Scrumptins Fudgemallow Delight, Please."
15:21 "Yippee!"
17:09 "Please Enter."
This movie influenced language for a couple years. People were always saying, “Good morning starshine, the Earth says hello!” and shouting out “Mumbler!” I also used to constantly mimic that silly little nervous laugh Wonka did. So it was iconic for a few years, but now it’s mostly forgotten and doesn’t have the long-lasting memes and cultural impact of the OG movie. Still a great movie though.
Fun Fact: "Good morning starshine/The Earth says hello" is actually a quote. It's a lyric from the song "Good Morning Starshine" from the musical "Hair". It's got a lot of nonsensical parts to it, so it fits quite well.
omg I used to do the "mumbler!" thing all the time as a kid and tbh I forgot it was even from this movie
Deep Roy, a little person, is ALL of the Oompa Loompas. Incredible effort. Also starred in Star Wars, Star Trek and The Grinch.
Personally when I am comparing “remakes/retellings/new spin” I generally go by what I would rewatch the most. If it has more rewatchability then I tend to feel like that is the better film 🤷🏻♂️
Took me a while to figure out that this isn't a remake of the older film but a different adaptation of the book.
i love this version the best! freddie highmore as charlie is perfect! you all should check out August Rush, one of my favorites has Freddie, Terrence Howard, Keri Russell and Robin Williams 👏🏽💕
I have a thing with dolls, garden gnomes and the like. That spinning wheel of melting mess still horrifies me.
Like you saw in the notes after watching the movie, Roald Dalh absolutely hated the first one, and especially Gene Wilder's portrayal of Willy Wonka, which is why he refused to let anyone turn his book into a movie again while he was alive. This one is closer to the book and his widow said that Roald Dahl would have liked Johnny Depp's portrayal much better. At the end of the day though, it's a matter of taste. I really wish we coul erase your memory and make you watch this one first then the original, and see how your opinion might differ (or not) at the end. It feels like those who watched the original first tend to like that one better, and those who saw this one first tend to like this one better. I guess it also depends on which one you grew up with!
Smilex, where Charlie's dad worked, was also the chemical that Joker uses in Batman(1989)
This one was truer to the book
16:05
the one exact point I make when talking economics: "Money can be printed overnight. You want money? Stuff yourself up with it. As long as you don't ask for solutions, you'll still be poor."
I never watched the original movie. This one really freaked me out, I couldn't see where it was going, and I was fully convinced, at any point now Wonka will kill all these children. "It's gonna be a horror movie, trust..."
LOVE how y’all always do something fun for your promos you guys have so much personality best channel ever!☺️