Cirrus Vision Jet G2 Flight Trial

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
  • The $2.75 million Cirrus Vision Jet G2, for second-generation, remains in a class by itself because it's the only certified single-engine turbofan-powered personal airplane, and it has the Cirrus CAPS whole-airplane parachute. For 2020, the Vision Jet has a few sizable changes including RVSM compliance for a 31,000-foot operating ceiling, increased payload, a 1200-mile max range, Safe Return Emergency Autoland (which is currently being certified and to be standard equipment), plus autothrottle. In this video Aviation Consumer Editor Larry Anglisano takes a close look at the Vision Jet G2 with Cirrus' Matt Bergwall. Read the full report in the January 2019 Aviation Consumer magazine.

ความคิดเห็น • 164

  • @HarveyCohen
    @HarveyCohen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Commenters who claim the airplane is a poor value versus competing planes may be right. If so, I'd be interested to understand why there's already 500 orders.

    • @v1_rotate638
      @v1_rotate638 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Harvey Cohen because cirrus is good at marketing... and they can up sell existing customers who are flying sr-22s

    • @Vladdy89
      @Vladdy89 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is a very strange question. Put a bitten apple on the fuselage and there'd be 5000 orders.

  • @craigjhr
    @craigjhr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When Dogecoin goes to the Moon, I might get one of these, since it'll fit in my 42' wide hangar.

    • @smartcontract7929
      @smartcontract7929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      when ADA touch 100 dollar i will buy a cirrus and tmb 940 e.e

  • @jamman55
    @jamman55 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The major sell here is safety. The parachute system has already saved lives. I expect the price to go down as more orders are filled and production is more streamlined.

  • @Assassin1959
    @Assassin1959 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The passenger is not landing the airplane, the computer is landing the airplane.

    • @tonyunderwood9438
      @tonyunderwood9438 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The real question is who gets to log it? Garmin? lol

    • @Assassin1959
      @Assassin1959 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tonyunderwood9438 of course and Garmin will log it as PIC. lol

    • @a9653192
      @a9653192 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonyunderwood9438 obviously Jarvis

  • @markbaker8
    @markbaker8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Does the Safe Return feature have 'Go-Around' if the conditions change on approach etc?

    • @Sokeresa
      @Sokeresa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a great question. I doubt it

    • @a9653192
      @a9653192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Well since you are squawking 7700, and it sends out a declaration to tower. You’ll get granted clearance first

  • @Windtee
    @Windtee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think there's a Vision G1 for rent on Long Island, NY at KFRG, Nassau Flyers.

  • @sigbauer9782
    @sigbauer9782 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is what cracks me up about all of these aircraft- 14 seats but if so loaded, then you will be able to carry enough fuel to get you to the hold short line of your desired runway. Seriously, don't effin' say that the plane can carry 5 "Adults" and 2 kids if your fuel load will only get you 100 miles.

  • @2011blueman
    @2011blueman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I don’t see the value in this over any of the higher end turbo props. The load and range specs don’t fit my typical mission profile, and operating costs are higher.

    • @3204clivesinclair
      @3204clivesinclair 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Although it may not meet your needs, it does have some unique features, that are not available (to my knowledge) on any turbo prop. BRS (like them or not), they are a USP for Cirrus aircraft. Add the latest flight control electronics that can auto land the aircraft (initiated by a passenger), in case of an incapacitated pilot. The closest aircraft I can think of that has such an easy starting system is the PC12 (latest version), although that is a lot more expensive and larger.

    • @mikeassayag8044
      @mikeassayag8044 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Clive Sinclair and it’s got a parachute

  • @trade_design23
    @trade_design23 ปีที่แล้ว

    While, the young lady in the back is only doing as instructed........ What a Joke !! You need a much better system to hold the camera steady other than someone with a cell phone held at arms length. LOL. Try a short tripod that can be set up on the floor of the back seat area. Other than comedy central from the back, an informative video. And for the young lady in the back... Post your resume, you need a better job.

  • @TobyMcVinn
    @TobyMcVinn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "or if a Vision Jet is longer a part of their future"
    What a beautiful piece of corporate talk.

    • @_monti142
      @_monti142 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah

    • @lunitedes1
      @lunitedes1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      $$$$$ , buy a bigger faster one.

    • @Saintathantwinpeaks
      @Saintathantwinpeaks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      More likely speculators buying early slots so they can price gouge once demand soars.

  • @Enonymouse_
    @Enonymouse_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If had this kind of money to spend, this is a toy I would love to own.

    • @Enonymouse_
      @Enonymouse_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kelp Farming 😄.. they would still starve if i didnt..

  • @dani73737374
    @dani73737374 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for this video! Would you let me know what's your setup for recording cockpit audio?

  • @DavideCarbonell
    @DavideCarbonell 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this aircraft have no wiper ?

  • @oscarc332
    @oscarc332 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    this is the perfect transition from cesnass to a jet and then to embraer 145 or crj200

    • @ThatGuy-ob2yw
      @ThatGuy-ob2yw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      very expensive transition

  • @GodSonBlessed
    @GodSonBlessed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you're super rich this is a better way to spend your money than a Bugatti.

  • @MAGApepe
    @MAGApepe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    4:00 checklist 10 oxy master on,, but its not,,, i caught ya lol

  • @johnames6430
    @johnames6430 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    he should've practiced his little speech infront of a mirror or something, it was bad

  • @bodystomp5302
    @bodystomp5302 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'd like to see Niko upgrade to one of these.

    • @ram64man
      @ram64man 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He has a great tdm already that’s more mission ready to his needs that turboprop he has is amazing

  • @elonwong
    @elonwong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    il just keep dreaming of buying this beauty

  • @videosuperhighway7655
    @videosuperhighway7655 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The real costs will be fuel costs, hangar costs, maintenance etc… you need to earn about 2M a year with 5-10M in liquid net assets in order to own one. Otherwise it makes more sense to use something like netjets card etc.. and just pay per use.
    What this jet will do is open up private jet travel to more people since it will make fractional use more affordable.
    60 gallons an hour is impressive nice cut in fuel expense.

  • @arsenalroo
    @arsenalroo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "more easier"

  • @yougotburned2143
    @yougotburned2143 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If they used raw carbon fiber for the center and instrument console it'd look way better and not look so cheap plasticky.

  • @marcusjohn6654
    @marcusjohn6654 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    IF they can every get this aircraft to carry 5 pax at 200 pounds each, and 3-4 hours of fuel, it would make the perfect air taxi .

  • @CraigWilton
    @CraigWilton 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Seems like you’re just a passenger in your own plane. Hardly pilot’s aircraft.

    • @herobo123456
      @herobo123456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Its about getting for a to b safely not hand flying around the lake on a Sunday. They dont want too many GA knuckleheads crashing them

  • @AnguoChen
    @AnguoChen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m training at KHFD.

  • @schumzy
    @schumzy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If only there was a sound measuring device, to really help us understand how much noise reduction they've done. Guess we'll just have to take their word for it. I mean they wouldn't talk about a negligible improvement just to sell million dollar plane, now would they.

  • @tobberfutooagain2628
    @tobberfutooagain2628 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    300 kts., FL310, 60 gal./hr., 3 pax, Takeoff distance 2,500ft., $2.75M

  • @richieknecht
    @richieknecht 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow, have them do another demo in CT! Would love to go for a ride. KHVN!

  • @littlebit670
    @littlebit670 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now the TBM 940 is getting E-Autoland, called HomeSafe in that plane.

  • @heavyizthacrown-5842
    @heavyizthacrown-5842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Auto-land system might allow some with certain disabilities/medical conditions to fly safely again. Great *innovation* Cirrus! 👍🏾

    • @jarodmorris611
      @jarodmorris611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Unlikely. Just because the jet can land safely doesn't mean that the FAA is going to approve that pilot to fly. I don't think the FAA would approve a pilot to fly a jet and no other type of aircraft due to a medical issue.

    • @biggentallen
      @biggentallen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah but the FAA won't

    • @sigbauer9782
      @sigbauer9782 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, you still need a valid medical.

  • @TumusiimeJoseph-tm8xz
    @TumusiimeJoseph-tm8xz ปีที่แล้ว

    Tumusiime joesph

  • @TobyMcVinn
    @TobyMcVinn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cirrus will sell the shit out of these I'm sure.

  • @cmdmd
    @cmdmd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Farther: measurable distance
    Further: progress

  • @rblx0879
    @rblx0879 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I fly this on 9- X plane 11!

    • @tomatosoupwoo
      @tomatosoupwoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s a g1 in x plane 11 as far as I’m aware.

  • @gmcjetpilot
    @gmcjetpilot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    SE Jet.. but it's turbo prop speeds. For a lot less money you can get clean early model TBM.

    • @bradfordmontgomery4647
      @bradfordmontgomery4647 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of course you can. But this one is new and a lot of people like to buy new panes.

  • @nazur72
    @nazur72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My offer: $2.6 million, not a penny more.

  • @donaldholman9070
    @donaldholman9070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Like the music

  • @liamhygge
    @liamhygge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    У девчонки глаза разбегаются
    Она всеми силами пытается снимать, но ей явно не до того

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Но она очень милая

    • @liamhygge
      @liamhygge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Craneman да)))
      Особенно, когда сама не может осознать происходящего, будто первый раз в самолете)))

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@liamhygge Я согласен, она выглядела нервной и растерянной.

    • @liamhygge
      @liamhygge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Craneman а ты потерянным и запутавшимся. Ибо что ты делаешь в этом видосе? Это ж надо его найти и попасть на просмотр еще

  • @RobertMayfair
    @RobertMayfair 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The number one reason this thing sells is the ability of its owners to tell people they have a jet.

  • @degentelletubbie
    @degentelletubbie 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the range of one of these at MTOW?

  • @Psychopappy
    @Psychopappy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How many miles can this fly

  • @alexeyzorkin2288
    @alexeyzorkin2288 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Самолет просто космос!

  • @thomasauto4862
    @thomasauto4862 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    MMM...Jet Noise!!!

  • @upsidedowndog1256
    @upsidedowndog1256 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like the V-tail. My favorite aircraft to fly has that and handles like nothing else in the air, except hopefully this!

  • @StreetArtillery
    @StreetArtillery 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too heavy

  • @skiba21sk
    @skiba21sk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jésus 😍😍😍

  • @roostersideburns3440
    @roostersideburns3440 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    id love to ride in one of these

  • @amiraghazadeh5820
    @amiraghazadeh5820 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👏👏👏❤❤❤

  • @ItsAllAboutGuitar
    @ItsAllAboutGuitar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Something about the CAPS, the auto landing...I just don't care for it.

  • @TM-vn3du
    @TM-vn3du 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who's the BABE in the back?

  • @sleepingwithesirens9397
    @sleepingwithesirens9397 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Honda Jet all the way !

  • @JoshuaG
    @JoshuaG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If only that emergency autoland are on big jets , hahaha xD

    • @doolittlegeorge
      @doolittlegeorge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good point and of course the problem with a passenger plane is its enormous mass. The airframe basically *falls* out of sky to land. There is no such thing as a *controlled descent* in a commercial plane.

    • @v1_rotate638
      @v1_rotate638 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Andrew Doolittle that’s...absolutely not true in the slightest 😂

    • @clickenpie
      @clickenpie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Some commercial jets are already implementing/implemented this concept for emergencies when the pilot and copilot are disabled from landing or flying the aircraft

    • @v1_rotate638
      @v1_rotate638 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clickenpie also false but okay

    • @ellachen6865
      @ellachen6865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@v1_rotate638 airbus a220 has already achieved cat 3 autoland. So they are already STARTING to implement this. Concepthyper never said it was fully in the systems.

  • @Kaipeternicolas
    @Kaipeternicolas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice update. I'd still go for the TBM or PC12 I think. I just don't like single engine turbo fans and the Vision Jet just seems like a toy plane to me.

    • @tonyunderwood9438
      @tonyunderwood9438 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I go back and forth with the TBM and the Vision Jet as our next one. Number one reason the Cirrus Jet is still in the discussion is the chute. Momma really likes the chute and momma gets what momma wants. ;-)

    • @mikeassayag8044
      @mikeassayag8044 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Tony Underwood I’m on the sAme page Tony. Having a chute on to- of having auto land... there is no comparison for he safety for me and my loved ones. Rugs technology will be forced into higher end jets in the future

  • @Xperim
    @Xperim 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This jet has the shittiest specs out of all jets.

    • @liamhygge
      @liamhygge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Xperim and lowest price

    • @Xperim
      @Xperim 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @NonyaBusiness! You can get a Eclipse 550 for around $2.5 million.

    • @chucklesx
      @chucklesx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Xperim... if you do some research the eclipse alot of negatives. The theory of the airframe and ownership mision is great but in reality their production is limited by lack of funds, they have two projects (kestrel turboprop and eclipse canada) that have been on the books for years and neither have shown much progress, again due to lack of money. The company is basically seen as on the verge on bankruptcy most the time by many in the industry. As for the current or older aircraft they have a history of issues including the avidyne avionics suite being tempermental to say the least.

  • @douglasownbey656
    @douglasownbey656 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just saw two of these fly over the house today on their way to Lancaster, PA.

  • @Craneman4100w
    @Craneman4100w 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The rep said you just passed 300 kts but the PFD says 226 kts. My TAS/KTAS Calculator says 214 kts but my OAT Estimation Calculation might be off a bit. I'd consider a Citation Mustang and upgrade the G1000 to NXi before I bought this turkey. It flys faster and higher with more room and seats inside plus a Lav and twin engine redundancy and would cost over a million dollars less. No contest.

    • @AVweb
      @AVweb  4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Negative. The B-roll you saw was lagged a touch with the actual standup audio, and the frame shows the aircraft's speed just after level-off from the long climb. When the autopilot trimmed it and the airplane settled into cruise, it made 303 true.

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AVweb Ok, thanks, it just didn't show.

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @NonyaBusiness! If you have the cash..... That's the thing. If you pony up close to 3 million dollars for a plane (including taxes and sales commissions) a few hundred dollars an hour is nothing. Keep in mind the million-plus you save buying used. Those savings will easily buy many thousands of gallons of JetA with very generous amounts left over for a paint job and an overhaul or two. Look at many of the used small jets for sale and you'll notice that few have any significant hours on them. You are looking at toys for the wealthy who become bored or no longer willing to invest time into remaining current and move on to the next adventure. Remember, there are a lot of people who can purchase these things with no more financial strain that you would have buying a Happy Meal.

  • @Airplanefish
    @Airplanefish 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your not going to talk about the "Autobrake"????

    • @AVweb
      @AVweb  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure we could. The braking mode was disabled in this airplane when we flew it last fall. The company made the decision to not demo the braking when the airplane was away from its home-base test environment.

    • @Airplanefish
      @Airplanefish 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AVweb I did the first annual inspection on that SF50 you were flying. Right after the inspection it went back to cirrus to get the executive center console thing and the "fly me home safe" system installed.

  • @staticon1976
    @staticon1976 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this might be a dumb question but what if a bird flys into this port 4:42 ? it burns out the engine and crash land???

    • @tonyunderwood9438
      @tonyunderwood9438 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      With any single engine plane (turbine or otherwise) the pilot has the option to attempt an emergency landing in the event of an engine failure, but with both Cirrus piston and jet aircraft the pilot also has the option to pull the chute to get on the ground safely.

    • @ericww1993
      @ericww1993 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has parachute

  • @ga1205
    @ga1205 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Mismatched b-roll and poor grammar from the rep selling a $2.75m aircraft made this grating to watch. Maybe try more than one take and don’t have the intern do the editing on the next one.

  • @peppeddu
    @peppeddu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Note the big size high contrast buttons and text on all screens.
    Where the rubber meets the road and speed/accuracy/safety count they don't do tiny fonts with light-gray text on a white background like the crappy apps on Android and iOS

  • @alesso9174
    @alesso9174 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is this safer than a cesna?

    • @khali333k7
      @khali333k7 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think so since it has a particular deployment

  • @sbreheny
    @sbreheny ปีที่แล้ว

    Unless she did not want it, you should have also credited the employee in the back doing the camera work. Given her young age, maybe she is only an intern, but still, she should be credited.

  • @1biggun712
    @1biggun712 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1 Bitchin jet 😋😁

  • @willie31133
    @willie31133 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Centerline for takeoff is just for professional pilots I guess. 😉

  • @raymond3803
    @raymond3803 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ugly plane. Ugly cabin. Stratos, Diamond D ducted engine look so much better.
    Eclipse 400 and Epic Victory look better
    Piper Jet looks worse.

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You just mentioned a bunch random jets that either no longer exist or lack certification

  • @glishskiii
    @glishskiii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rather have a king air

    • @CraigWilton
      @CraigWilton 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      glishskiii same

  • @raymond3803
    @raymond3803 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    $20,000 plane parachutes or so stupid, expensive and heavy.
    Never take off without a back-pack parachute $1,500.
    When things go south, pick up everything that can be used to ID you.
    Climb out on the wing. Spray paint over plane ID as best you can...…….. *THEN JUMP!*

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dumb as hell try that at the wrong altitude and see don’t you pass out disabling you from pulling the chute, or worse you get sucked into an engine or killed by a turboprop.
      You’re not a genius there are reasons people aren’t just carrying parachutes 🪂 stop watching so many movies.

    • @raymond3803
      @raymond3803 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WattsUpDev Dumb? Really? There's several hundred 737 max passengers that would have took that option if given the chance. 3,000 more who worked in WTC.#1 & #2
      Commercial Plane Seat cushions should be back -pack parachutes with a snack, drink, and blow-up flotation devise inside. 138 IQ is closer to genius, than moronic dumb ass.......A lot closer.

    • @raymond3803
      @raymond3803 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Stool Postssubstantiate that claim

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      rayism 24b Stupidity is something you can’t debate with.

    • @raymond3803
      @raymond3803 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WattsUpDev Don't see "stupid" nor "debate" mentioned in this thread. Why would you?

  • @armaghanasghar2911
    @armaghanasghar2911 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who else is planning to buy a jet because of the pandemic?

  • @alaskaaksala123
    @alaskaaksala123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would be an awesome plane to own...

  • @prestonmiller9552
    @prestonmiller9552 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I guess one of my objections to the Vision Jet is the Vee Tail similar to the old Bonanzas. The Bonanzas suffered from fish tailing and often made rear passengers air sick after a time. I assume this is the same problem with the Vision Jet although perhaps a good yaw damper might help. The sound level still seems a bit loud with the engine placement atop the Fuselage. Not sure I would be a candidate for a Vison Jet purchase. I guess I would need a flight test to be sure.

    • @AVweb
      @AVweb  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Not an issue in this airplane. It has yaw stability augmentation, and the autopilot's yaw servo automatically engages on the initial climb. No tail wag.

    • @fiedlertimify
      @fiedlertimify 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      On top with one vs two on the side. Doesn’t seem to me like it would be that big of a difference?

    • @tropicthndr
      @tropicthndr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s why the tail is as tall as the Empire State Building, to get ride of that.

  • @tropicthndr
    @tropicthndr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You mean the first version was so noisy for passengers they had to wear headsets in the back, what the fk. That’s definitely not what anyone wants when they ride in a jet.

    • @creativemode7397
      @creativemode7397 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only reason it's noisy in the cabin is because the aircraft is so small, the engine is soo close to cabin to the cabin. Plus, it's one of the cheapest jets you could buy, they don't put thick 100% noise reducing walls in the aircraft. They use whatever material is best for the price.

  • @enricomosca4674
    @enricomosca4674 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please don't fly on busy airports... Take-off performances are so poor... Atc here.

    • @aa134368
      @aa134368 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Specifics?

  • @airbornepotato
    @airbornepotato 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    16g/h that's awesome

    • @superchargedpetrolhead
      @superchargedpetrolhead 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      60 gallons/h on cruise, Not even many pistons do 16/h gallons on high speed cruise and this is a turbofan.

  • @chippledon1
    @chippledon1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a curious layman (not a pilot), are there certain conditions that you cannot fly in? Such as high winds - it being such a small craft.

  • @robertlashier8779
    @robertlashier8779 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does an average person own one of these??

    • @Captndarty
      @Captndarty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      By marrying a non-average person

    • @jlalbee
      @jlalbee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The average person doesn't.

  • @khali333k7
    @khali333k7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish if kobe Bryant had this type of cirrus, he wouldn't have died , this cirrus is very ok because of its parachute deployment

    • @GodSonBlessed
      @GodSonBlessed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      RIP to Kobe, Gianna and all the other people who passed on that day. But this wouldn't have worked for Kobe, because he needed the helicopter to be able to take off and land anywhere like his backyard, daughters gym, his doctor's office the bank etc... You can't do that with a jet.

  • @naughtyUphillboy
    @naughtyUphillboy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    & Headphone Jack fire.........Cirrus..........get Serious about Quality.........

  • @naughtyUphillboy
    @naughtyUphillboy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3 people ........pretty loaded Up.......