W59 is better than the F-91w in every possible way. -Better strap -50 vs 30m water resist -Better finish -Bigger screws and o'ring -Better light (barely)
W59 is underrated👍 It pops even better when it’s on your wrist and gives it a very nice contrast. It also suddenly becomes alive on your wrist. I’d say it’s more elegant and traditional and somewhat sophisticated compared to the f91w. F91w gives me the 90s vibe with sharp lines & edges and w59 the late 80s vibe oozing retro future. Both are great iconic designs from the postmodernism era.
I have both, and I think the W59, in addition to everything you mentioned, has a slightly thicker rubber strap. But for everyday use, I still prefer the F-91W because of its iconic design.
@@francohic Sorry, unfortunately I can't confirm. My W59 is much newer. I've had it for about 1 year and so far the strap still like new. I think if it lasts another year or two it will still be worth it.
The F91 30m water resist good for rainy day and hand washing and shit backlight. The W59 I own one! Same as f91 but with 50m water resist. Good for a swim or shower but same shit backlight. Those two watches is only 1,- difference. You can pay 5,- extra For the W-217H-1AEF It has a illuminator good backlight and 50 meter resist But I didn’t like the looks of the W-217H and I went for the W59
@@lengda I agree ☝️ I have also a g-shock. Very good watch! Has solar, multiband6 and Bluetooth. I just hope for a W-59 or F-91W to have solar and multiband 6 much smaller watch on you’re wrist and very light
Little known secret: Casio actually made a version of the W - 59 with a nato strap and an all black-and1gray dial. I have it, some glimpses of it can be seen in some of my videos,and I plan to review it on my channel… I might be biased, but I think it looks killer!
I have 3 fake F91W(poor timekeeping) and one genuine.I now wear the W59 as it is genuine and better waterproofing with the same unobtrusive small wristprint. I have many much more expensive watches which I rarely use
Very nice review. I own them both and they make me happy every day, by just alternating. You can wear them all day long, without ANY problem - light, reliable and very good looking.
They're both about the same in terms of being able to handle day to day tasks. The improved water resistance doesn't mean much if both watches are used for everyday tasks as intended.
O w 59 é o f 91 w são excelentes relógios, só falta a casio melhorar a iluminação deles acabar com essas micro lâmpadas e colocar iluminação de led ou eletroluminesente aí vai ficar show.
I still preferring the F-91W, the 59w has a childish design, idk, more round corners and graphics on the face, for me looks a bit old, that's not bad but the F-91W although looks old too seems more contemporary, like some retro design that aged well. But both are great watches and the 50 meters water resistant of the 59W is a big plus. I enjoy your videos man, keep it up!
Brand aside the Skmei 1412 beats both watches £3.00. Had my Skmei 2 years , it works with no issues, is waterproof and the backlight is awesome. I also own a W86 and IMO at £16.99 from Argos in the UK i think this offers the best value for money out of all of the square full resin watches in the casio range
Very true. I needed a beater and also a sleepwatch basically so that i avoid looking at my phone in the middle of the night for a quick time check. But the f91w's backlight didn't help. I tried other digital watches but none of those are as small simple and comfortable to wear while sleeping as the f91w. I struggled but still used it with the shady backlight until i grabbed myself thr skmei 1412, the backlight is AMAZING, and surely a bang for the buck!
@@UFA-jc8gu interesting, I’ve compared the 1412 with a Casio F91w and found that within 2 days the skmei has lost over 2.5 seconds, that’s an average of a second a day, and personally bothers me heavily. But this is a sample size of one.
I have both. In the UK, the price increase on the W59 is not justified. However, I bought it because of the design. If you want one with great backlight *and* water resistance at a terrific price, buy a W86. PS. Both mine are on Nato straps. The F91W was an easy swap, the W59 was an absolute pig to change. You have been warned.
Nah, love my F91w. Love that has a name on the watch dial, love the WR logo at the bottom. No lugs. Wore it in the Olympic pool this summer with no issue. Light is fine and its screen is better scratch resistant than I thought. I would buy another one in a heartbeat.
i have both picked alot, (7) casio, s up at a car boot for 3 quid lol got both of these... nive functional watch Casios oldest still in propuction I think...
To be honest, the W59 is an odd watch, in my eyes. It's a good aesthetic, as it basically mirrors the F-91W, and the extra water resistance is nice, but if you're going to put out another watch, why keep the same famously-terrible backlight? That feels like a missed opportunity.
I prefer the bad light. At night, in pitch dark, it is perfect , and doesn't wake me up. It's just bright enough to be visible, in a gentle way. And wastes less battery
Only issue is the W59 is $30 when it should be a $20 watch or less. Then you have the W86 that's the W59 and F105 mixed together that's stupidly not available in the US. That watch costs $25 and can be imported from Amazon.
I’m just not as big of a fan of the thickness of the A168. The A1000D is great! I got one and it feels incredible, the one issue I have with it….the negative display on the one I got.
@@Watchcastage oh, I avoid the inverted aka "dark" displays too. They are not as good with contrast and yet it's just a rotated polarisation filter of the same lcd.
The design of F91 is better being more streamlined, while W59 because of the bigger bezel looks that much more chunkier. The F91 is well known to have WR well beyond specification so I wouldn't worry it being less than W59 on paper. Both are good watches, however F91 can be scooped for much lower price as I'm typing this the price difference is close to double, so at least for me W59 isn't worth twice the price hence why I believe it will never gain the icon status like F91.
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
W59 is better than the F-91w in every possible way.
-Better strap
-50 vs 30m water resist
-Better finish
-Bigger screws and o'ring
-Better light (barely)
W59 is underrated👍 It pops even better when it’s on your wrist and gives it a very nice contrast. It also suddenly becomes alive on your wrist. I’d say it’s more elegant and traditional and somewhat sophisticated compared to the f91w. F91w gives me the 90s vibe with sharp lines & edges and w59 the late 80s vibe oozing retro future. Both are great iconic designs from the postmodernism era.
How does a watch "suddenly become alive" on one's wrist
iI guess it is a figure of expression ..I get it as I also wear a W59 as my daily watch@@TreeLibrary
You're joking, right?
The solution is simple, get both! I like them both, depends which one I feel like wearing to work that day
I've had my W59 since I was about 15... it was a gift from my father. Still works great some 25 years later!
I have both, and I think the W59, in addition to everything you mentioned, has a slightly thicker rubber strap.
But for everyday use, I still prefer the F-91W because of its iconic design.
I heard that the strap of the W59 breaks easily. Could you confirm that?
@@francohic
Sorry, unfortunately I can't confirm. My W59 is much newer. I've had it for about 1 year and so far the strap still like new. I think if it lasts another year or two it will still be worth it.
The F91 30m water resist good for rainy day and hand washing and shit backlight.
The W59 I own one! Same as f91 but with 50m water resist. Good for a swim or shower but same shit backlight.
Those two watches is only 1,- difference.
You can pay 5,- extra
For the W-217H-1AEF
It has a illuminator good backlight and
50 meter resist
But I didn’t like the looks of the W-217H and I went for the W59
i have same think, W-217H much bigger and heavy weight........ :( but cheaper.....
W-59 it's better than F-91W, 50M WR i like
@@lengda I agree ☝️ I have also a g-shock. Very good watch! Has solar, multiband6 and Bluetooth. I just hope for a W-59 or F-91W to have solar and multiband 6 much smaller watch on you’re wrist and very light
Bought the w59 chungus today. Instant favourite!
Nice to see you living the full 24 hour days. =)
you forgot to mention that you can put a nato strap on the w59
no please , it is perfect with the regular strap :D
Little known secret: Casio actually made a version of the W - 59 with a nato strap and an all black-and1gray dial. I have it, some glimpses of it can be seen in some of my videos,and I plan to review it on my channel…
I might be biased, but I think it looks killer!
The Casio W59 is my new grail watch. I have to contact my AD to see if we can work out a deal.
casio f91w the best watch👍
I like more rounded design of W-59
I have 3 fake F91W(poor timekeeping) and one genuine.I now wear the W59 as it is genuine and better waterproofing with the same unobtrusive small wristprint. I have many much more expensive watches which I rarely use
Very nice review. I own them both and they make me happy every day, by just alternating.
You can wear them all day long, without ANY problem - light, reliable and very good looking.
Sometimes, the only watch that can truly beat a Casio, is a Casio. lmao
Idk why but the W59 reminds me of the street fighter font color. The gold and red colors almost look like yellow and red
W59 is more rugged....... the F91W more casual.......But I have both!
They're both about the same in terms of being able to handle day to day tasks. The improved water resistance doesn't mean much if both watches are used for everyday tasks as intended.
O w 59 é o f 91 w são excelentes relógios, só falta a casio melhorar a iluminação deles acabar com essas micro lâmpadas e colocar iluminação de led ou eletroluminesente aí vai ficar show.
I still preferring the F-91W, the 59w has a childish design, idk, more round corners and graphics on the face, for me looks a bit old, that's not bad but the F-91W although looks old too seems more contemporary, like some retro design that aged well. But both are great watches and the 50 meters water resistant of the 59W is a big plus.
I enjoy your videos man, keep it up!
Brand aside the Skmei 1412 beats both watches £3.00. Had my Skmei 2 years , it works with no issues, is waterproof and the backlight is awesome.
I also own a W86 and IMO at £16.99 from Argos in the UK i think this offers the best value for money out of all of the square full resin watches in the casio range
Very true. I needed a beater and also a sleepwatch basically so that i avoid looking at my phone in the middle of the night for a quick time check. But the f91w's backlight didn't help. I tried other digital watches but none of those are as small simple and comfortable to wear while sleeping as the f91w. I struggled but still used it with the shady backlight until i grabbed myself thr skmei 1412, the backlight is AMAZING, and surely a bang for the buck!
the only downside with Skmei is the movements suck, they lose time quite quickly compared to even the cheapest offerings from casio.
@@nequastar1826 No issues with mine keeps same time as my Casio W86
@@UFA-jc8gu interesting, I’ve compared the 1412 with a Casio F91w and found that within 2 days the skmei has lost over 2.5 seconds, that’s an average of a second a day, and personally bothers me heavily. But this is a sample size of one.
@@nequastar1826 it's a £5 watch it wouldnt bother me too much if it's a few seconds out.
Just ordered the F-91W. Hard to beat at $13.
I have both. In the UK, the price increase on the W59 is not justified. However, I bought it because of the design. If you want one with great backlight *and* water resistance at a terrific price, buy a W86.
PS. Both mine are on Nato straps. The F91W was an easy swap, the W59 was an absolute pig to change. You have been warned.
Hey I love them both but the design on this one is pretty interesting
I will Review the F-59 and I will CALL IT "THE CHUNGUS" and reference back to you! It feels great on the Wrist! Thank you!
The W59 came out in 1982 and is still available after 42 years...oldest casio model on the market.
Its a boring watch
Big Chungus
The original one still looks better
W59 made in China… not sure if that makes a difference but to me it does. F91-W is the best imo..
1:47 Got the Chungus today on my Wrist. Its awesome!
Nah, love my F91w. Love that has a name on the watch dial, love the WR logo at the bottom. No lugs. Wore it in the Olympic pool this summer with no issue.
Light is fine and its screen is better scratch resistant than I thought.
I would buy another one in a heartbeat.
i have both picked alot, (7) casio, s up at a car boot for 3 quid lol got both of these... nive functional watch Casios oldest still in propuction I think...
To be honest, the W59 is an odd watch, in my eyes. It's a good aesthetic, as it basically mirrors the F-91W, and the extra water resistance is nice, but if you're going to put out another watch, why keep the same famously-terrible backlight? That feels like a missed opportunity.
w59 is older then f91w. So the F91 mirrord its aesthetic and kept the terrible backlight.
I prefer the bad light. At night, in pitch dark, it is perfect , and doesn't wake me up. It's just bright enough to be visible, in a gentle way. And wastes less battery
You have the F105W with better light that covers all screen. I still prefer the W59 with its bigger screws, bigger buttons and a little thicker font.
I am ALSO, A watch nerd, who ALSO..plays guitar…..if you has an interest in guns we’d be soul mates
who swims more that 30m deep ?? ...Steve Zisou
casio w-202 is similar in size, style and price, but nicer looking watch with a better specs than those two, imho
Same light forget it
I got both of em, and they work just the same, i can snoorkel with them without a problem. Great watches!
The W-59 Feels Premium!
With that skin, this guy looks like he barely leaves his house let alone go scuba diving 150 FT underwater....😅
You’re sweet for noticing. But correct, I do not go scuba diving.
@@Watchcastage 🤣👍
how hard is the battery change?
Only issue is the W59 is $30 when it should be a $20 watch or less. Then you have the W86 that's the W59 and F105 mixed together that's stupidly not available in the US. That watch costs $25 and can be imported from Amazon.
Bought it for 17$, in Romania.
@@codrupaun8070 I'm sure import fees or taxes add to the cost for me.
@@codrupaun8070 where you bought it? I can't find it anywhere in Lithuania 🫤
You forgot to mention that the 59W costs twice as much, a lot to pay just for the improved water resistance.
you're getting ripped off, costs are pretty much identical.
I'd go for the A168WA or A1000D. Better Backlight!
I’m just not as big of a fan of the thickness of the A168. The A1000D is great! I got one and it feels incredible, the one issue I have with it….the negative display on the one I got.
@@Watchcastage oh, I avoid the inverted aka "dark" displays too. They are not as good with contrast and yet it's just a rotated polarisation filter of the same lcd.
Both beautifull version
THE CHUNGUS!
Have both :)
What is that little letter "u" underneath the word "Resist" on the F-91w?
U means assembled in Malaysia. Japan U means assembled in Japan
no
The design of F91 is better being more streamlined, while W59 because of the bigger bezel looks that much more chunkier. The F91 is well known to have WR well beyond specification so I wouldn't worry it being less than W59 on paper. Both are good watches, however F91 can be scooped for much lower price as I'm typing this the price difference is close to double, so at least for me W59 isn't worth twice the price hence why I believe it will never gain the icon status like F91.
Could someone explain why the F- 91W became a huge classic instead of W59? I don't see any reason why it couldn't be other way around 🤔
the better F91 substitution is the W202 it is overall better.
Cool man tanx👍🏼👍🏼