No Man's Sky PC Game Review
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ค. 2024
- Support me on Patreon: tinyurl.com/zd48qvf
Follow me on Twitter: / ggdograa
Join the Gggmanlives Steam Group: steamcommunity.com/groups/gggm...
Reddit Fanpage: / gggmanlives
No Man's Sky is an action-adventure survival video game developed and published by the indie studio Hello Games for PlayStation 4 and Microsoft Windows. The game was released worldwide in August 2016.
No Man's Sky's gameplay is built on four pillars - exploration, survival, combat, and trading. Players are free to perform within the entirety of a procedurally generated deterministic open universe, which includes over 18 quintillion (1.8×1019) planets, many with their own sets of flora and fauna. By exploring, players gain information about the planets that they can submit to the Atlas, a universal database that can be shared with other players of the game. Players get compensated in in-game currency every time new information is uploaded to The Atlas. Players also gain materials and blueprints to upgrade their character's equipment and purchase a variety of starships, allowing them to travel deeper into the center of the galaxy, survive on planets with hostile environments, interact in friendly or hostile manners with computer-controlled space-faring factions, or trade with other ships. Some activities, such as killing too many lifeforms or draining too many resources from planets, will draw the attention of patrolling robotic Sentinels that will attempt to kill the player character.
Players participate in a shared universe, with the ability to exchange planet coordinates with friends, though the game is also fully playable offline; this is enabled by the procedural generation system that assures players find the same planet with the same features, lifeforms, and other aspects once given the planet coordinates, requiring no further data to be stored or retrieved from game servers. Nearly all elements of the game are procedurally generated, including star systems, planets and their ecosystems, flora, fauna and their behavioral patterns, artificial structures, and alien factions and their spacecraft. The game's engine employs several deterministic algorithms such as parameterised mathematical equations that can mimic a wide range of geometry and structure found in nature. Art elements created by human artists are used and altered as well. The game's audio, including ambient sounds and its underlying soundtrack, also uses procedural generation methods from base samples created by Paul Weir and the musical group 65daysofstatic. - เกม
Hey I'm thinking of founding the planet of Sonny Jim, who's coming?
Me
+GeoffCereno's Gaming so far so good
Big Will OFC m8!
+Jon Baxter Genius XD
Brutally honest, other reviewers could learn a lot from this.
Is other reviewers giving this game good reviews? Ive only seen 3 including this but all three pretty much slaughters it. Aint going to buy it so i wont bother looking up more reviews myself.
literally everyone and their mom is bashing this game
most favorite game reviewers ar gggman, and gameranx
Cereal Is it that bad? I havent watch any others on this game so far.
+karl Andersson expect for GameSpot who sounds like that took some good weed half way through playing.
More like No Man's Buy
hehe...
Come on man i agree with every review but can you imagine working for like 8 years on a game and everyone ends up hating on it? Its kinda depressing.
Duke Nuke em Forever
+Clorox Bleach Well yeah, sucks for them. but it sucks for us to you know, having spent 60$ on a disappointing game.
+UFHoee no mans hi
Hilarious and Original
love this guys reviews
Cool to see you here. Your honesty and realness is something you share with gman it's why i watch you both.
David0vić Thanks man. Means alot
guy's*
69 likes
gays*
But...but...there's a patch coming! It's gonna change EVERYTHING! And then another patch and another and another. If you just wait a year it'll be slightly more fun! God people are so impatient!
Lol, I see what you did there
yeah love these people that talk like this is an early access game.
No, a game should be technically finished, and polished up before the release date, not some time after.
+Marc Shimpar no man it's real name should be "mineborderdestinycraft"
I hope they can improve this because the game does look interesting
Another thing they could of done, is take inspiration from games like LittleBigPlanet, Minecraft, and Spore. Have player be given a planet and there own creation tools, and let them go wild. and of course in order to see someones planet, you have to space travel to it to see it.
Exaclly. The reason I liked Minecraft is that the game let's you go wild with creativity, exploration and survival. I was hoping No Man's Sky would do something similiar. :/
Excellent idea. That would be an interesting game to play.
***** Well I'm taking college classes on game development, so maybe I'll keep this project in mind
+Zer0dog That's also what's on my mind! Would be nice to progress from rocket building 21st century culture to ancient like beings that seed the galaxy with stargates and life! :)
I'd love to see an updated review
Good review fella, appreciate these new reviews as well as the retro
I think this was hyped because console players don't get games like this often. We have tons of them on pc and NMS looks like a poor one at best.
and console players seem to be the only ones that enjoy it. but thats probably because it actually runs on console
im pretty sure that console edition runs fine and no the dev got everyone hypedup for this(yes even you pc gamers so dont blame the innocent)
+NecroFeeLuP That's cause they barely get those Early access survival game, which is mostly on PC.
+NecroFeeLuP even though I usually play games on console (because my computer is shit) most people who play on console have a lower standard for video games.
Tenzing Khedup
yea, i was agreeing with him because most of the people that actually like this game play on console and its probably because of the reasons he said, that and the game runs better on console which could make it more enjoyable
Both haters and fanboys of the game have been equally immature on this, to be quite honest. I think this has been the most divisive game to come out in years, possibly of all time. The game isn't for everyone; it's a niche exploration game. Putting the performance issues aside, personally? I rather like it; I went in knowing exactly what kind of game it was going to be. This game was going to get massive hate even if it had a perfect launch.
Guess u loving it more than anything in the current state.
I love your reviews man! :)
My number one stop for reviews!!
Keep up the great work bro!!
Procedural Generation is just the devs saying they couldn't be arsed to make it themselves. Obviously no one could ever make 16 quadrillion planets, but I've come across bases floating in mid-air I can't reach just because the tip of it is touching a steep hill Etc.
Also, why is the whole universe nothing but trees and plants? Why is there not a single civilization on any single planet? not even abandoned ones, would have been great exploring long dead cities/temples Etc.
Yeah you are completely right. Thanks to the Open World / Sandbox hype, there is a hype about making ludicrously big games filled with nothing interesting. Even some not Procedural games have already the problem filling their vast world.
For builder type of games it makes sense. Because the World is nothing more than the Canvas for your Creations.
Also it's an integral part of the Rouge like experience.
I also think it can Work if it's used in combination with Handcrafted contend.
Like generate a template world and then touch it up by hand.
Or use it to fill the space between handcrafted points of interest.
I personally like more the randomize something out of a pool of hand crafted parts approach.
Procedural Generation is not bad in itself. It should be something used more in video games. It's a good way to generate large areas without having to put it there by hand. Shit, even the earliest games featured this system. The developers of the original Fallout games certainly didn't place every tile that appeared when you stopped on the map. Some tiles were reserved for towns (the "prebuilt" tiles) and some were reserved for the wasteland (the "procedurally generated" tiles).
I can imagine devs using procedural generation to create a base, and then touching it up as +RFTL said above me.
Procedural Generation is just A.I. randomizing a set number of mathematical rules, what it can't ever do is put in any creative component to make things interesting or relevant. It's something only a human can envision (for the time being anyway).
But it's where Minecraft excels, as it creates a randomly generated world, but then lets the player design what the world looks like. No Man's Sky is Minecraft without the building.
You say trees and plants..... any bodies of water, lava, toxic gases, acid.... you know, other than rocks and plants? Gas Giants? Ringed planets, black holes, space phenomena? Planetary exploration sounds great, but not without space stuff going on too.
*****
Well yeah that's what it is, but "procedural generation" doesn't mean all or nothing. The developer can control how much is generated, and how much is not. I could write a system to generate a small, realistic forest, and then populate it with animals, structures, and events. I still had to model and texture the different trees, as well as write the math in order to generate the trees for the map. Small-scale procedural generation is indistinguishable from just putting everything there manually. If I were a developer who had to copy-paste from a list of 100 different trees every time I wanted to make a believable wood, I wouldn't build large worlds. I would much rather have a "paint brush" to "paint" in some trees (some map building tools allow that sort of stuff).
If you've ever played SimsCity 4, you can see this in action. Go into God Mode, and put down trees and animals. Not all the trees and animals are the same. It uses math to pick what trees/animals to throw down. As simple as it may be, it's still a form of procedural generation.
The idea of exploring a huge galaxy is awesome but this game is just so repetitive and shallow.
There's no alien civilizations on the planets, the space stations are empty, the animals you find don't even react to you so they may as well not even be there and there's barely anything to do.
All you do is collect shit so you can combine it with other shit to make more shit then rinse and repeat until you get bored.
Way too overhyped but it will sell millions of copies because games like this are prime TH-camr bait.
Play rodina it is like this but better and cheaper. and even has a free demo. its great fun.
Play starbound. It does space exploration in a great way imo. However its 2d so some people get discouraged.
Ratchet & Clank does this better, and everyone uses the same crates.
Damn GGG, back at it with the reviews
The major reason I love your reviews, is that you are brutally honest with your reviews, and even make certain recommendations of what to buy and what not to buy.
People deserve to be let down by this. Stop expecting good things from procedurally generated games.
***** Quintillion Tarantinnio.
***** It sure felt like a trillion hours long.
eh, procedural generation can be pretty good. Not saying this game applied it particularly well or anything.
Procedural generation can be good if done right, just look at Minecraft. This game actually has unique enviroments and chances to create amazing constructions.
GARRY'S MOD
And remember, Steam will only refund your purchase price if you've owned the game for less than 14 days, and have played less than 2 hours, so ACT FAST!
I love your videos. Please keep up the good work.
Im just going to start insta liking all your vids because I can rest assured they are always top notch ;)
Lifeless is the result when your game is made by an algorithm.
No Man's Sky is giving me serious flashbacks to Destiny and not just because the menu/inventory menu is basically a copy and paste.
The game has improved in many ways since release - I give the devs props for making a concerted effort to improve it, though the UI still isn't great, and there's still a fair deal of technical bugginess. I would say, if you can get it on sale and enjoy exploration/sandbox games like Minecraft, you'll find much to enjoy with No Man's Sky. There is a lot of micro-management of resources etc. but that goes along with the survival genre. It's far from a perfect game, but with the more recent patches, it's a very decent and enjoyable exploration/building game.
Imma read this instead of the review
I really like your reviews, keep it up! :-)
Hey gggmanlives! Just discovered your content and I honestly love it so I dropped a sub. Have you ever considered live streaming while you play the games you review? I feel like I would be super interested in that!
I have shit internet so live streaming is impossible.
Game gets overhyped, ends up being shit, Still made profit from preorders, The people who bought it and can swallow their pride admit its shit and regret it, "preordering is bad", new game gets announced, Game gets overhyped...
This is why the modern games industry is shit.
Called this and Watch_Dogs as overrated POS from initial trailers. I am a happy man.
No-one should ever be happy when games come out that suck. I'd rather be wrong and have a good game to play.
***** It was painfully obvious neither could deliver -- Aren't you happy when you avoid a con artist's tricks?
Alexander de Montfort If you actually believe these developers aren't actually trying to deliver a good game and are just out to rip you off it says more about you than it does about them
Nick Hunter At the end of the day, if they're asking for money, I don't care what their intentions are -- it's what they manage to deliver to the consumer
Alexander de Montfort Well of course, but failing to deliver doesn't make someone a con artist
Great review! as always. Your channel is as good as TB or AJ or WAB, , glad i found it recently.
Great review man.
Have you done terminal velocity?
No.
Thanks for your reply love your cannel! As your an FPS guy like me this game may not be your cup of tea. It's like decent Ish. But out side on different worlds
kreepthedestroyer
I remember Terminal Velocity it was pretty fun.
+Gggmanlives yea man and hard it was a 3d realms game I think. Another game to look at is trespasser the jurassic park game. also global ops I have a few other less known games if you need ideas. if that's possible lol. your a machine at this
+kreepthedestroyer also love your UT99 review best game ever
Agreed.
+David Johns i agreed with his first 5 words lol
First five words "No Man's Sky may just"
Is it worth playing if you intend to get spaced and cruise around every once in a while? I think I might like it since I wasn't on the hype train
Hey Gggmanlives, Command and Conquer Renegade, my mind got blown away back then when it came, to see the same c&c units and buildings in first person, being a PC buff, it would be interesting to see what you have to say about it.
What nrl team do you support?
Fairweather Sharkies.
Souffs 😢😂
Soon.
Team Sonny Jim
Another great honest review!! keep up the good work.
Yet it remained on every you tuber's "top 10 anticipated games" list for almost a year. I could see this coming a mile away
Will you review Marathon 1 and 2?
The game doesnt even run at the resolution you set. It still renders 720p, the only thing that changes is the HUD.
Wait, SERIOUSLY?
I'm so glad I didn't preorder. The game has a fantastic premise but it looks as though it missed the mark.
Good review, like always.
woah sunny jim I didnt expect this to be so mundane :/
Sean straight up lied to people, deceived people about the game and the tech and some people still defend it. 2,5Gb download on pc, how many textures and variations is that? 4 ? Jumbled mess.
Can we just call 2016 the year of disappointment?
Rin In A Bin Fair enough. But there's been a lot of fuck ups this year.
Seriously, we got so many high profile disappointments, kills, events, and controversies that I'm surprised that all of us are still alive.
Doom was a good surprise.
uncharted 4, dark souls 3 and doom save it
Don't worry, when Trump wins it will make up for it.
+poonoo87 Trump will build that wall and we'll all be safe from the evil tyrannical space aliens.
Awesome review man! :)
i like you're reviews sir, specially because it sounds that you stern....stern but fair. Can you do one for Crash Bash?
I knew this game would suck....
BIG but vague claims, that's all it ever was.
This game doesn't look like a AAA-Title, the whole hype seems to be based on marketing. The fact that this works for a large amount of gamers shows what the actual gaming scene is all about: Selling crap to pre-teens and pre-teens in mind. This makes me sick.
A wing commander is way more interesting, but to put you to sleep NO Man's Sky could be probably appropriate.
uh yea, it doesnt look like a AAA title because its an indie game
+NecroFeeLuP Not exactly. It is indie in terms of the game being made by 12 people. Other than that, not really, they haven't published it themselves, as Sony helped them via funding and exclusive to PS4 and PC only at the moment.
For being made by 12 people it's a great result.
True It's still listed as 60. The same price as a AAA
7:13 LMAO. One of the best reviews I've ever seen. You are a man
Great review
glad I never bought into the hype
Well, thank fucking God Jim I didn't preorder this rotten Rubén.
I love Reuben sandwiches! but they give me hellacious heartburn...
+BendApparatus Fuck your health, Rubens come first.
Salokin Sekwah
Well I guess I can always keep some antacids on hand...
BendApparatus Now ya getting it!
Finally. I was waiting for this review.
Great sonny jim, that was quick!
great review, cutting through the BS and laying it out just as it is
I still like No Man's Sky as a technical concept, but as a game it's SHEEEEEIT.
EDIT: If anyone's still looking for a good space exploration game, I heard that Elite Dangerous is pretty good. It's like No Man's sky, minus planet exploration, but better in every other way.
Same thing as No Man's Sky. Million star systems to go to, but nothing in them to find. Might be true to real life but it doesn't make a good game.
This. Unfortunately, the genre has been stuck at the first hurdle since the first Elite decades ago - the technical achievement is no longer in simulating the universe, it's filling that universe with things worth doing.
You can land on planets now in Elite I think. Haven't played it in quite a while.
It's better looking, has better combat, more ships and better trading. That said, there's also not much to do in it either. Sure, you can mine asteroids, hunt pirates, be a pirate yourself and trade but it all amounts to earning money to get a better ship to earn more money. Once you're at the end there's nothing to do since all tasks have overstayed their welcome by then.
It's a real shame.
Didn't you have to buy the expansion (another $60?) to get planetary landings?
And the planets on ED are completely barren, nothing at all like NMS. As I said, more realistic, sure....but boring.
compmanio36
Yes, there's that too.
0:53 "appears to lack a fundamental misunderstanding" lel
Do you think you would review the indie game Strayspells?
This game is just an example of what's wrong with the gaming industry these days. The game was hyped up to unbelievable levels, and for a while, No Man's Sky was all I ever heard about for days on end. Everyone excitedly went out and bought it to play on their cutting edge PC rigs expecting an amazing next gen gaming experience. But instead we got an unfinished game full of bugs, glitches, bad design choices, and lack of content. But the sheep ran out and bought it anyway, and that's exactly the reward developers see as a cue to make more of this crap, because they know people are gonna buy it regardless as long as it's hyped properly.
still don't have windows 10? damn bruh
Windows 10 is lame.
It's optimized for gaming, you would get better framerates with it
He doesn't want his PC ruined.
RollinJoints
Yeah but I've heard lots of games don't even run properly.
+Gggmanlives I've upgraded to windows 10 and now about half of my retro games don't run, so yeah, probs not the os for you
There's nothing wrong with procedural generation. There's a problem with too much procedural generation. Procedural generation works well if you're doing small things, like generating a village to populate a kingdom, and leave the hand crafting to bigger things like the major towns and castles of the kingdom.
They could have given a few solar systems worth of planets and made the procedural generation more strict for planets, such as just governing a planets atmosphere, size, and amount of life, while handcrafting large elements that wont appear more than a couple times. Having the space around the planets procedurally generated as well, with random encounters and what not. The scale of the game is too large.
6:43 You may or may not be talking about the reviewer Haedox. The title of his video includes the phrase "A Mile Wide but an Inch Deep."
No, it was a random comment I saw on 4chan.
+Gggmanlives Ah, I see. It's still a good quote regardless!
Overpriced
You should try this now, it's pretty good now.
Can you do a review of Swat 4? Or if you own one some of the Playstation exclusives like Heavy Rain or The Last of Us?
2:55 When you upgrade your boltcaster or mining beam it does take up inventory space, that's right. But that multitool inventory can't be used anyway so what's the big deal using up slots that would not have been used otherwise?
I didn't even think of this until the "wide as an ocean, deep as a puddle" quote popped up, but this is basically all the problems I had with Skyrim all over again. Bethesda should be embarrased that their world design is literally on par with a soul-less computer algorithm from an indie developer.
That's exactly my problem with Skyrim, I've never understood why people love it so much. No amount of mods could improve it.
+Zaqq You're just wrong. mods make skyrim to a by far superior game of its time. Its modded graphics are 2016 or even ahead, its modded stories are better than most of the shitty failed AAA Titles the last years and its modded gameplay makes fun even after 500+ hours ...
After customizing it with 100+ mods it is by far better than any other rpg of its kind out there... even 6 years after release.
+Zaqq Skyrim Like all Bethesda RPGs, Skyrim's world felt like a cardboard cutout. You cannot suspend your disbelief enough. And of course the dragons and the civil war are barely gameplay without mods.
Somehow, I still found skyrim fun as hell.
+A1r80rn3 vanilla skyrim was the most boring bethesda world design... fallout 3, NV and 4 all have for its size very damn good designed maps! To me it didn't happen at all that I found some places in fo4 boring or repetetive...
Benhard Wiesner
I haven't played fallout 4 extensively, just for a few minutes on friends accounts. Fallout 3 and FNVs map design is good. It's the characters that fill the map I didn't like.
do this one again. lots of changes here. Could be a redemption story
Great review, absolutely spot on. Subscribed :)
Thanks for subbing!
Fantastic review m8
40 hours in, I'm still having fun with it. There's a reason people enjoy games like minecraft, ya know.
But at least Minecraft had more depth and an end goal with mod support and multiplayer.
Yeah people like minecraft because it has goals and a soul. You build up a character and a house, you dont run out of inventory space every 20 seconds. On top of no mans sky being boring its just poorly designed as a game, it feels like a bunch of retarded early access rejects were in charge of gameplay design.
sexymajesco Minecraft is literally gather resources and build a house lol. No man's sky is the superior exploration game.
BlackstarHalo4 No mans sky is literally try to gather resources(you cant because inventory is full) wonder why the fuck the items despawned forever then slowly delete shit from inventory to make room for more things. There is nothing to work towards in no mans sky, all your items feel temporary and worthless.
sexymajesco you haven't played the game long enough then lmao
I heard the game is trash and Looks like its trash afterall.
perfect review.
I wanted to love this game, but your spot on!
Would it look better on Widows 10?
Such a whiny review, yikes
Such a constructive comment, yikes
I could phrase it in a more constructive way if you'd like:
I liked the content of your review, but if you tone down the sass you might make newcomers to your channel more likely to check out your other videos.
Sorry for my unhelpful comment.
notstarboard
Tone down the sass? I'm not going to kiss the games ass, sorry.
Gggmanlives There's a difference between giving measured criticism and sounding legitimately angry and bitching at the game. I mean maybe you really hated it, but that was off-putting to me. That's all. No use talking about it any more. Have a nice day and good luck with your channel.
hahaha you are funny
Have you done a review for Elite Dangerous?
A very well done review.
Hey gggman,will you ever revuew tom clancy splinter cell(any game in the series)?
I like how pikmin 2 had a regular map and procedurally generated underworlds, a good mix.
hey, can you do a Lovley Planet "Arcade" Review??
Can you check out the mod project reality for battlefield 2?
can you review again after next release
Thanks for the honest review. I played it for 2 days before returning it, and couldn't agree with you more about everything you said.
Have you considered reviewing the Hitman series or the Splinter Cell series on PC?
Randomly generated terrain can have its use, like plotting down massive chunks of the land which then one could refine to something presentable (thinking ES IV: Oblivion). But fully procedurally generated worlds will always have problems.
Hey Gggman, ever plan on reviewing Space Engineers?
Nope.
Gggmanlives awwww :(
Wow I really called it on this one. Good review!
GGGman,are you looking forward to Star Citizen which looks a bit like No Man's Sky?
Kind of.
Thx for the review kind of hoping for like a npc to fight on different planet guess not
I guess what impressed me the most about this whole fiasco is that the developers didn't just cut and run. They somehow managed to survive the storm and are still working on trying to improve the game with free updates (at least thus far). While some tedious mechanics still remain, the game have improved quite a bit since this review. Maybe give this a second look after the new update is released later this year.
Buyer's remorse indeed. I don't think you've ever put out a review this fast before.
Are you ever going to review Pathologic?
I heard this game got better later on with patches and the addition of multiplayer.
I have a love/dissapointed relationship with this game, but for the most part I'm very pleased with it actually. I pre-ordered it with moderate expectations and from the first moment of the game I was in love with the fact that it was just me on a frightening foreign planet with a busted ship and two legs. I was hesitant to even leave the crater my ship was laying in. When I couldn't find any zinc I traveled 21 minutes on foot, ducking into caves to avoid bad weather along the way, towards an unknown "?" destination to finally buy zinc from a terminal in the flatlands. I jogged all the way back to my ship with an amazing sense of accomplishment and found my ship just as I had left it over 40 minutes ago. Leaving the planet was an emotional experience. Every unique experience and every new sight from then on (especially the space station, atlas interface, anomaly, ruin, bizzare planet) envoked a feeling of awe in me. In my first 25 hours not a single resource gathering felt like a grind as I was excited to be able to upgrade my next technology. I really took my time during those 25 hours and explored each planet I came across a good bit before moving on to the next system.
Now jump ahead 10 more hours and the game has very little new to show me other than the occasional giant flying lizard creature that is nothing like I've seen before. The atlas interfaces and anomalies are all identical, I think I've seen every combination of ruin and ship, and worst of all the once-thrilling threats in the game such as environmental hazards, enemy ships, and sentinels have been exposed as what they really are: deceivingly simple programmed devices that only punish with the smallest slap on the wrist and can be easily avoided as there's always somewhere to hide, a mineral nearby to infinitely heal yourself with, or if you do happen to bite the dust you can just return to that spot and pick up anything you lost when killed. The game also has some massive programming flaws and confusing mechanics. My ship's photon cannons have always been at 0% and the game is telling me to feed them oxides to recharge them but I have no need as they still shoot without ever needing to be refueled! The 10 atlas stone path is also a massive slap in the face as if you sell even one stone you really have no way of obtaining more other than hoping to find a trader with one for an asking price of millions of units, or by using the duplication glitch. Who is going to use up 10 slots in their inventory to store stones that have no apparent use other than to be resold? No one, and it's very disappointing to reach the point where atlas asks for them and you don't have them, even though you quit selling them once you heard they were useful and started storing them back up.
Overall I do not regret buying the game, I've had many hours of great fun with it and I look forward to getting to the center of the universe soon, but NMS is not for everyone and it is NOT what it was advertised as.
So I'm having trouble comprehending the point about not being able to go "back" to a planet/system once you have left? Is it still in existence, or is it GONE? If it is GONE then that really sucks a giant one.
Also thanks for introducing me to Reuben Sandwiches. I have had two. One at the large pub near Bribie Island, and one in Bendigo. Both were sensational.
I don't know, you just can't go backwards to old systems.
Thanks man. This game is so weird.
Kano Wins
Yes it is :)
the game has so much potential they should have added a mechanic that give you resources for every planet you control making your own Little Empire based off territory and other players could conquer your territory so it would add a multiplayer component
There are 2 goals of the game go to center of universe or follow the atlas quest
Why this game had so much hype is beyond me. I only found out about it days before its release
r u going to review Battlezone 98 Redux ??
Windows 7? Are you thinking about upgrading your operating system?
GG could you review Space Engine too ?
I appreciate your honesty. At first I thought this game looked neat but I was suspicious that it would be repetitive.