A psychologist's casual review:Borderline, narcissistic and schizoid adaptations by Elinor Greenberg
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ส.ค. 2024
- A wonderful starting point to understand and learn how to detect and handle patients with personality disorders. writing in a simple but not simplistic style this book is a must read for young therapist interested in these personality issues.
it’s so beautiful the way you described this
very warm and fuzzy
Thank you for your kind words.
Great to hear your review of this book. Very true that she is clear in her explanations.
Thank you. Here explanations are top notch and very accessible which is a breath of fresh air in the field of psychodynamic theory.
@@talkingpsychology Yes, I like when she said that her work is free of 'Jargonese' :)
@@SchizoidVision really love that word!
Your interpretations and break downs are sooo good! Amazing! Thank you!!
Glad you like them and Thanks for your kind words!
Sounds like an excellent book!
Yes it absolutely is and I highly recommend it ! Thanks for your engagement!
Thank you for your book recomendation also your review about the book. I keep enriching my window of knowledge about psychoanalysis from your reviews😊
I am happy to know my work is useful to you. Thanks!
This is great!!! Thank you, I got the book.
Hope you enjoy it! And thanks for your comment!
I definitely need to read this one!
😀
I love your channel. Are you an INFP? I wonder what you think of the Myers-Briggs types? Really interesting review, you discuss concepts in a stimulating way
@@revontulet1845 thanks for your comment and positif feedback! I am an INTJ-T, I personally like the Myers-Briggs test as it is a first step in understanding one's personality and it can be food for thought. But I don't use it in a clinical settings as it isn't as precise as the MMPI-3 or the Rorschach with a TAT.
@@talkingpsychology Somehow I'm often mistaking INTJs and INFPs! I'm INTP and I have a channel discussing this and general psychometrics. I'm very skeptical of the Rorschach and TAT, but would be interested to hear more about why you use it and its general application. I'm not a clinical psychologist, but I find it fascinating. I would love to interview you on my channel sometime. Or just discuss these ideas!
@@revontulet1845 yes I can understand why people would be skeptical of the Rorschach and TAT. I used to use them earlier on in my career but nowadays I rely more on my clinical 'intuition' and 'knowledge' than on personnality tests. However I am by no means a psychometric expert and my understanding is that the French usage and interpretation of the Personality test are different from how there are used in other countries. It would be a pleasure to talk or be interviewed on your channel. Please feel free to email me if you want to. Thanks again!