The Porsche Cayman GT4 Has Dimples Like A Golf Ball!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ค. 2021
  • 2021 Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 vs 718 Cayman GTS 4.0 - Aerodynamic Comparison!
    Thanks to Mobil 1 for sponsoring a portion of this video!
    Subscribe to Engineering Explained for more videos! - goo.gl/VZstk7
    Recommended Books & Car Products - amzn.to/2BrekJm
    EE Shirts! - bit.ly/2BHsiuo
    The Porsche Cayman GT4 and GTS 4.0 both feature a naturally aspirated flat-six cylinder engine. They both have PDK and manual transmissions offered. And in this case, they're both the same shade of blue. But there are actually dramatic differences in terms of how these cars perform, much of which might be overlooked by the naked eye. The aerodynamics of the GT4 are all about downforce, while the GTS 4.0 is all about minimizing lift. The GT4 has an upgraded chassis, suspension, wheels, tires, engine tune, and many aerodynamic changes to maximized downforce and minimize drag. Part of the solution? A dimpled underside, similar to that used on a golf ball!
    On a golf ball, these little dimples cause turbulence, meaning little pockets of swirling air, so instead of a laminar boundary layer, you have a turbulent boundary layer. In this case, the turbulent boundary layer stays attached to the golf ball longer, wrapping around the ball, meaning the wake behind the golf ball is smaller when the airflow detaches from the golf ball, and a lower pressure region forms. With a smaller wake, the ball has less drag, and thus can travel farther. Porsche says the same logic applies to the GT4, in their words: “At the front end, the special surface on its underside is dimpled, reminiscent of that of a golf ball. As a result, the airflow follows the contour more precisely, reducing drag.”
    Engineering Explained is a participant in the Amazon Influencer Program.
    Don't forget to check out my other pages below!
    Instagram: / engineeringexplained
    Facebook: / engineeringexplained
    Twitter: / jasonfenske13
    EE Extra: / @engineeringexplainede...
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 618

  • @Ballacha
    @Ballacha 3 ปีที่แล้ว +682

    "it's not hail damage. it's an aerodynamic feature."

  • @alexmonje2682
    @alexmonje2682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +149

    "Should I buy the GTS or GT4?"
    "The question is simple: Why are you thinking what car is better for you if you dont even have money to buy a Dacia Sandero?"

    • @dukecraig2402
      @dukecraig2402 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's like the age old question of "Ginger or Mary Ann", to which I always reply "Both!!!".

    • @mk177
      @mk177 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You had mention the Sandero :))))

    • @motodot.
      @motodot. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Great news!

    • @pootisspangle6636
      @pootisspangle6636 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh yeah, the cheap but not crap british car James May rode in, right?

  • @ColeSpolaric
    @ColeSpolaric 3 ปีที่แล้ว +295

    The only person I know that gets two cars from the same manufacturer at once

    • @kevindelgado7083
      @kevindelgado7083 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Sabūr Ali Khan wow, amazing 🤩 😯

    • @imranahmad2733
      @imranahmad2733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It's like comparing the hardback and paperback versions of the same book.

    • @maximravinet9950
      @maximravinet9950 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It often happens to Jayemm on cars with Porsche and audi

    • @underseer
      @underseer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stradman has 2 Aventadors...

    • @kevindelgado7083
      @kevindelgado7083 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@underseer “gets”, not “owns”

  • @andrewfox723
    @andrewfox723 3 ปีที่แล้ว +236

    Thank you for the bananas. I wouldn’t have known how big the frunk is.

    • @Derekzparty
      @Derekzparty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I don't always measure my trunk space
      But when I do
      I use bananas

    • @mehmeterdemsimsek1932
      @mehmeterdemsimsek1932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I love the way americans measure things everything but the metric system

    • @thecorsentino
      @thecorsentino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      banana for scale

    • @JM-pg8qv
      @JM-pg8qv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thecorsentino Someone gets it :)

    • @orangeVSappel
      @orangeVSappel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JM-pg8qv I don't get it

  • @wolfaviator0112
    @wolfaviator0112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +230

    I know it’s a good day when I hear “Hello everyone and welcome.”

    • @PhD__
      @PhD__ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      And it is also a good day if you feel free to leave your questions or comments down below.

    • @YounesLayachi
      @YounesLayachi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello everyone *_aaaannd_* welcome

    • @victor555117
      @victor555117 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What about the whiteboard??

    • @pedrosolipa3701
      @pedrosolipa3701 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ehehhe indeed

  • @corvetteACDC
    @corvetteACDC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Every time I read about this in engineering textbooks, I always wondered why it wasn't implemented on more race cars. Glad to see this dimple phenomenon being used in new applications.

  • @mmitchell1727
    @mmitchell1727 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    My high school science fair project was on the application of golf ball dimples to vehicles based upon Bernoulli equations and wind tunnel experiments back in 2006 and I got 2nd in the state of GA. Showed that applications in certain areas provided fuel economy benefits.

    • @nordvestgaming1238
      @nordvestgaming1238 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's super interesting, do you have anywhere that I could read about it? If not would you mind explaining it in further detail, like which parts of the car benefit from a dimpled surface?

    • @aashishluthra8124
      @aashishluthra8124 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'd like to know too, if you have aby material that you went through or created yourself. Thanks in advance

  • @sleepeatdrive7619
    @sleepeatdrive7619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    MythBusters was a great show to watch back in the day!

    • @mreid08
      @mreid08 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes they did and proved the concept

    • @juliettaylorswift
      @juliettaylorswift 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      but yet so many people still wont believe something even after evidence is provided...prime example being all the people who still say that a plane can't take off from a conveyor belt. But flat-earthers also still exist.

  • @HumbleMechanic
    @HumbleMechanic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    Nothing like using Jetta tech to make your P car faster. HAHA

    • @PatTheCarNut
      @PatTheCarNut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I came here to say basically same thing. 😁

    • @TheJohnlyh
      @TheJohnlyh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Makes PP goes faster"

    • @ScathingMobile
      @ScathingMobile 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No wonder Porsche tried to buy Volkswagen pre-GFC.
      For the dimple IP.

    • @ktkace
      @ktkace 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Technically both vag lol

    • @michaelw6277
      @michaelw6277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yup, my 11 year old Golf has these.

  • @JacobParkYusuk
    @JacobParkYusuk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    After living in the DFW... all my cars now have dimples like golf balls due to the hail.

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Great idea, live where your car naturally gets more aerodynamic!

    • @johnhunter7244
      @johnhunter7244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I live in DFW and my windshield has dimples too!

    • @rubidot
      @rubidot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds like you two should consider getting Cybertrucks.

    • @johnhunter7244
      @johnhunter7244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rubidot I would be fine with that but my budget is about 10% of the cheapest cybertruck.

    • @rubidot
      @rubidot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@johnhunter7244 in that case, I suppose you'll have to stick with nature-assisted performance modifications.

  • @bribribri888
    @bribribri888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    this is one of the best and most detail review on GT4 i have ever seen, good work man

  • @OoxNemesisxoO
    @OoxNemesisxoO 3 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    I had a panic attack when that golf ball fell off the bench towards the cars.

    • @juancar3
      @juancar3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same here!

    • @EvanK2EJT
      @EvanK2EJT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too!

  • @smc2811
    @smc2811 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent material, thanks for uploading.

  • @SCWgreg
    @SCWgreg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Driving in our beautiful backyard! Bonneville dam and along the old Columbia Hwy. You put together some great segments here. Thank you.

  • @TorkildKahrs
    @TorkildKahrs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Would love to see a EE + NileRed collab on the fluids that go in a car.

    • @brandonpayne1207
      @brandonpayne1207 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      NileRed - "See this Lambo here? We are going to reduce it to it's chemical components."
      Jason - "Hello and welc... Wait what?

    • @arjunyg4655
      @arjunyg4655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      “Today we are making engine oil from this pile of Geo Metro fenders I picked up at the junkyard”

  • @rahulsagarpv
    @rahulsagarpv 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so satisfying to watch! Thanks you EE

  • @BiggMo
    @BiggMo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Jason, can you do a video on why engines over the years have had an even number of cylinders. Why Audi failed at their five cylinder (90’s?) but now we’re seeing three cylinders - what has changed and are they a good idea

    • @bergtroepie203
      @bergtroepie203 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Should be a fairly simple answer I think. If it's an inline engine then an even amount of cylinders is not too important, but when it's a V or flat engine then symmetry is very important for eliminating vibrations. Even with an inline engine I think up and down vibrations could exist but combustion timings could minimize this while unnecessarily complicating the development.

    • @The.Toaster
      @The.Toaster 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Audi didn't fail at the 5 cylinder.
      It's still being used now. TTRS, RS3.
      The ford focus st used a 5 cylinder.
      Even the ford ranger wildtrak used a 3.2 litre 5 cylinder turbo diesel.
      They work fine.

  • @JK12518
    @JK12518 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW! This may be the best car video I have ever seen. Great job!

  • @Yathuprem
    @Yathuprem 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, lots of information.

  • @JetFuelOnly
    @JetFuelOnly 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice vid as always! You beat me to an aerodynamics episode on the GT4 though, was planning on it! You do a better job explaining though.

  • @oc0dyc
    @oc0dyc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is the comparison I’ve needed since I learned about the GTS! My realistic dream car just became more attainable! Thank you!

  • @sofullcole
    @sofullcole 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    This new cayman looks so good!!!

  • @demonhighwayman9403
    @demonhighwayman9403 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Yes I have seen the mtthbusters episode and have been waiting for a car with that tech ever since ! About bloody time someone took notice.

    • @Muuip
      @Muuip 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here! Finally done, I hope many other vehicles of all kind will follow.

    • @CroneRaven1810
      @CroneRaven1810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      VW been doing it for years as he have said though.

  • @bto7779
    @bto7779 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best car videos ever. The dynamics are all about the basics.

  • @showmerepair
    @showmerepair 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The 2005 Ford GT had the dimples on a large area on the under body. It is very cool to see this technology used on vehicles.
    Enjoyed the video.

  • @jeanpaulcomeau8131
    @jeanpaulcomeau8131 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video as usual.
    Thank you.

  • @tobylundh6298
    @tobylundh6298 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, very good Video and explaninations, thanks a lot for this video:))

  • @ddrmadness
    @ddrmadness 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Came expecting a reference to the Mythbusters episode, was not disappointed. I've seen a lot of people mention they prefer to see you in front of a whiteboard, but I like seeing these change of scenery vids as well. Great video!

    • @firstname405
      @firstname405 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      agreed, both are great!

  • @nirboom
    @nirboom 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love videos about the cayman GT4 and GTS 4.0. My dream cars

  • @Lateralgrip
    @Lateralgrip 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    as always!! Great video J!!

  • @AksBoutique
    @AksBoutique 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Congratulations for 3 Million!

  • @MrOnlinmrine
    @MrOnlinmrine 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was an awesome video !!

  • @theodoreshasta7846
    @theodoreshasta7846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Exceptional. Superb content.

  • @saccaed
    @saccaed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is reminding me that I've always wanted to experiment with covering the bottom of my Miata near completely with panels to see if there can be any mpg gains.

  • @ryanthomastew
    @ryanthomastew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OK that was one of your best videos ever. Never stop doing what you’re doing!

  • @ianyu9104
    @ianyu9104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the show, feeling like going to learn something when I hear"hello and welcome".Will we talk about how the wheel faring on a F1 car 2009 in the future?I‘m looking forward to understand it. Also interested in the gill radiator of earlier formula 1 cars.

  • @CubicSphere
    @CubicSphere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I noticed this on my dad's GT4 a couple weeks ago, and remembered EE's video on the inflatable reverse dimples lol

  • @varadkadam6009
    @varadkadam6009 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd love to see more of these kinda videos!!!!!

  • @PG1847
    @PG1847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's Been awhile.. Good to be back

  • @norbertonova8192
    @norbertonova8192 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, cool video! Would you do a video on dry steering?

  • @billhanna2148
    @billhanna2148 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you 🙏 AGAIN for your excellent succinct informative and funny work 🙏💪👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @curvyessentials
    @curvyessentials 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Those engineers are geniuses. Thx for sharing.

  • @Sharma72
    @Sharma72 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video. Interested to know which QuickJack model was being used in the video if you happen to know?

  • @ttiization
    @ttiization 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video as always

  • @joefields719
    @joefields719 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love your videos, especially the Porsche ones :)

  • @maxxedredlineproductions
    @maxxedredlineproductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congrats on 3 million subscribers! 😃

  • @koreanyoon
    @koreanyoon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    BEAUTIFUL automotive examples of art! GIMME-GIMME-PLEASE!!!

  • @shitsandwich1983
    @shitsandwich1983 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the gorge is a beautiful filming location. nice review.

  • @kevincorpetti1379
    @kevincorpetti1379 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jason! Where did you shoot the scenery clips with the mountains and water dam ?! It looks Beautiful.

  • @ollok2496
    @ollok2496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice explanation! You forgot to mention that the inventor of the Golf ball dimples was William Taylor. William Taylor, a britain, was one of the founders of Taylor & Taylor, later with the admission of Hobson it became Taylor Hobson. Taylor Hobson produced the world famous cooke lenses for cinematography and interestingly later they have invented the first surface texture and also the first roundness measurement equipment which became standard in engineering, construction and also in engine engineering. Today this company is still producing the most accurate measuring equipment with their headquartes in Leicester/UK. They were aquired by the american Ametek group years ago.
    I have mentioned this because most of the times you are lecturing about engines and my intention was to build a brigde -> From Golf balls to Engines...

  • @BoneSetterDC
    @BoneSetterDC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Looks way better than the Mythbuster's iteration of a golf ball dimpled car.

  • @fns58
    @fns58 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As always, very interesting video. I am going to investigate now how exactly a rear diffuser generates downforce, which is something I've never known despite being a mech engineer lol.

  • @kurvaonwheels
    @kurvaonwheels 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    After I saw the MythBusters episode, I thought of the same thing, only regarding airplanes.

    • @Ohem1
      @Ohem1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same, excluding airplanes :P

    • @TimBellis
      @TimBellis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Airplanes tend to use stall strips and vortex generators instead of dimples, but the goal of energizing the boundary layer by creating turbulent flow is the same.

    • @nothrabin
      @nothrabin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Airplanes just make use of the deadspace at the back instead of trying to minimize it. That's why they are so long and slender (teardrop shaped). There are limits and practicality reasons why you don't want to make a car long and slender, and obviously for a golf ball you can't orient it since it's a sphere, so in those cases minimizing the vacuum at the back is helpful.

    • @alexmills1329
      @alexmills1329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      airplanes use this principle a lot actually, look at a wing and the entire body, you see those exposed rivets? they cause the same slight turbulence and are left there for that reason, a better airfoil than a perfectly smooth surface. I'm no aerospace engineer but I did study aerospace engineering and take a few classes on it before I decided I liked what I was doing more than engineering

    • @CerberusTenshi
      @CerberusTenshi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cost effective production for the dimpled surface on an airplane is just not possible. Also maintenance cost would skyrocket, as seen with the attempt on using shark skin like texture on airplanes.

  • @harrysgarage1440
    @harrysgarage1440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Everything you said at the end of the video about which car to buy is so true. “I guess buy the GT 4” LMAO. Exactly what I was thinking. Great content, thank you.

    • @dukecraig2402
      @dukecraig2402 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think of it like the age old question "Ginger or Mary Ann?".
      I've always said "Both!!!".

  • @zed7038
    @zed7038 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations on reaching 3 million subscribers!

  • @TheMick26
    @TheMick26 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, Jason! I love the results of the work you out into your channel.👌 Congratulations on surpassing the 3 million subscribers milestone! Well done, sir.👏
    Unrelated fun fact: Women with dimples are a little bit faster, too.😜

  • @tommyleanza510
    @tommyleanza510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Way to parse the details! .. even though I'll never be able to afford either... it's interesting none the less..

  • @alexlutz2221
    @alexlutz2221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The exhaust thru the wheel well is a good idea I might have to use that on my mk1 rabbit racecar. Due to the fact that I have swapped in a haldex AWD system and a 1.8t that will make over 300hp I have very limited space in the back for the exhaust and it is 4 inches wider per side than stock so I might have enough room there it's at least something to look into.

  • @hawkertyphoon4537
    @hawkertyphoon4537 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Voice. The explanations. The Visuals!
    Bonkers!
    Nekkid girls can button up and go home while i keep watching Engineering Explained.
    Thumbs up and subbed! And the bell as well.

  • @keshavg2078
    @keshavg2078 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bowers & Wilkins uses that on their speaker ports

  • @seba911VTT
    @seba911VTT 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video !

  • @Pedro5antos_
    @Pedro5antos_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Porsche is awesome! Every project has its amazing details and well-thought engineering

  • @tet2mor282
    @tet2mor282 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really awesome video

  • @patrickodonnell6651
    @patrickodonnell6651 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent! Thank you

  • @user-hq9ij8vc8e
    @user-hq9ij8vc8e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Ahh yes, the banana for scale method

  • @chrisbeller6926
    @chrisbeller6926 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thanks for the info. I noticed all the downforce data is at top speed. About how much downforce is available on my GT4 at the track, where speed doesn't exceed about 130 MPH? I'm assuming downforce goes up with the cube of speed, so I'm thinking it decreases pretty rapidly coming down from top speed.

  • @Slays_Media
    @Slays_Media 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I feel like the Corvette should do this just for the golf aesthetic. 😂

  • @inebriatedengineering6288
    @inebriatedengineering6288 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Mobil 1 for sponsoring a Porschen of this video.

  • @s.r.5462
    @s.r.5462 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    When the ball rolled off the table I was so concerned about it bouncing into one of the cars 😂

    • @arzemagic
      @arzemagic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If it can’t take the impact of a slow-moving golfball it’s time to go home

    • @jamesbeaman6337
      @jamesbeaman6337 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If it had hit a car, it would have just improved its aerodynamics.

    • @s.r.5462
      @s.r.5462 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamesbeaman6337 hah! That made me laugh.

    • @s.r.5462
      @s.r.5462 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arzemagic only car id feel comfortable with a golf ball hitting is that Tesla cyber truck 😭

  • @daveblock4061
    @daveblock4061 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    America's Cup yachts used a similar concept 'shark skin' applique on the hull back in the 80s.

  • @muellmel
    @muellmel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    12:22 Banana for scale! That catched me off guard :D

  • @rainbowbunchie8237
    @rainbowbunchie8237 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's crazy how easy it would be to press some alumimum plates to cover your entire underbelly with.
    Slow process if you do it by hand, but it would bolt right into existing bellypan holes.

  • @onivlasbrony7432
    @onivlasbrony7432 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The underbody of early 2000' Opel Astra also had a dimple pattern.

  • @c9sc9s34
    @c9sc9s34 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you do a similar aerodynamic explain on the 2016 981 GT4?

  • @dy7296
    @dy7296 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    congrats for 3 million subs

  • @hrichayadav6329
    @hrichayadav6329 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please demonstrate
    How is lower and upper wishbone attached to uprights and chassis in F1 2020 car?

  • @frederickcook87
    @frederickcook87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the gt4, what’s the temps like coming off the backside of the radiator?
    Does Porsche run those diverter fins on the gt3rs with vented fenders

  • @TechLovinDude
    @TechLovinDude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My flight instructor heart can actually get on board when Jason talks about aerodynamics except on cars you want the opposite of what we want on planes haha

    • @yayayayya4731
      @yayayayya4731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And what is that?

    • @TechLovinDude
      @TechLovinDude 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yayayayya4731 Cars try and reduce lift and create downforce which is the same principle as lift just downward instead of upward like on a plane. Which is why calling a spoiler a wing is kinda ironic ;)

    • @CerberusTenshi
      @CerberusTenshi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TechLovinDude as James May pointed out, the diffetence between a spoiler and a wing on s car is, whether or not you can put your head through underneath it.
      The airfoil shape is the same for a wing on a car any an airplane, just rewersed. Though there have been airplanes with reverse airfoil wings. I think, it was for air shows though.

    • @TechLovinDude
      @TechLovinDude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@CerberusTenshi That's valid. I just think it's funny.
      Most aerobatic plane's wings are symmetrical in shape so the air actually travels the same distance whether it is traveling on the upper or lower boundary lower which doesn't invoke bernoullis principle and instead utilizes angle of attack manipulation with pitch to increase or decrease lift. Makes the aircraft more maneuverable for aerobatic purposes. Asymmetrical wings are better for stability and worse for maneuverability. In plane applications of course, not saying this part has anything to do with cars just responding to your point haha.

  • @phillm156
    @phillm156 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In some supersonic fighters, the wing surface has laser drilled pinholes to allow air to be sucked into the wing by a vacuum system. This reduces drag. Maintains super laminar flow and allows for super sonic cruise without afterburners. I’m waiting for this system to surface in a hyper car.🤔

  • @global_nomad.
    @global_nomad. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    would be interesting to know how much of that underbody cover would still work if swapped ...maybe just the diffuser

  • @RedShoesSmith
    @RedShoesSmith 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:11 Anyone know what mountain this is? Gorgeous landscape.

  • @rembo183
    @rembo183 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really excellent video! I’m not track oriented so the GTS is my choice. Did you notice which was more comfortable on ordinary diving roads etc? Are there any drawbacks to GTS compared to base Cayman for regular driving. I’d think the best choice would be a base cayman for street use? Smaller wheels -18” rather than 20” and softer suspension.... I think would make is softer more compliant and less harsh than the sportier GTS? Right?

  • @irofirelord
    @irofirelord 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where was this filmed? It looks so beautiful I need to go here I'm tired of desert.

  • @christopherpaez4948
    @christopherpaez4948 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Jason can you explain if it’s possible for a car to use less gas at the same rpm depending on the scenario and if so what’s the engineering behind it 🤔

  • @RangerColinLZ
    @RangerColinLZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 2021 GT4 with PDK is my dream car. Gotta work hard to make that happen.
    There's also a company that modifies the Cayman 4.0 engine to be 4.5L and makes nearly 100hp more than stock. It's wild.

  • @mzee5533
    @mzee5533 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Jason I like that car lift

  • @natalyasparrow6748
    @natalyasparrow6748 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Ah yes, finally a car that I can transport bananas in. :3 A good high-potassium snack that I can eat after doing hot laps.
    Also love the Mythbusters and Donut shoutouts. I love this community. 😊

  • @joe718gt4
    @joe718gt4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is that a GT4 with clubsport package? That roll bar or harness bar is not available stock in the US

  • @jackbn9353
    @jackbn9353 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had a 1986 Oldsmobile 3.8 litre with hail damage suffered in Deadwood, SD. My ANNUAL mpg was 30+ for all driving.

  • @rawdah786
    @rawdah786 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That integrated lunch box at the front of car is very innovative! 🤣

  • @crhu319
    @crhu319 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So...does this affect the optimal speed balancing drag, lift and momentum? For gas vehicles this was about 55mph/90kmh.
    I wonder if these features make enough difference to change that optimal speed. And is it any different for EVs?

  • @MD-do9ch
    @MD-do9ch 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gt4 vs Honda type R ? Specifically on track use and difference in cost consideration. Thank you

  • @Sazuza2
    @Sazuza2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the dimples remind me of the thermodynamic principles that regulate the beautiful vineyards of lanzarote, in the canary islands, that seen from a plane (or drone) look just like the cayman's floor.
    A little off topic, I am aware.

  • @fcbotieno
    @fcbotieno 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lexus utilized a similar system ~20years ago. Puma also used it on ⚽️s

  • @flyingpeter
    @flyingpeter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you service the engine? or is a case of engine out job?

  • @cygnusx10
    @cygnusx10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    EE + Porsche = like even before the video has started.

  • @Syncrogreg
    @Syncrogreg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude we need you on our team to make our Pikes Peak Bug diesel record even better!

  • @samfedorka5629
    @samfedorka5629 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I remember reading some people in the hyper-mile community have put dimpled plastic on the outside of their honda for better aero. This was some time ago.

  • @henrikcarlsen1881
    @henrikcarlsen1881 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the early 90'ies I read an article about how the dimpled texture of shark skin produces less drag and that surfboard manufactures were trying to incorporate this to their boards. Never heard more of this but I have always wanted me a board with "shark skin" surface, because I felt it was a good idea.

  • @TalooshDaBoss
    @TalooshDaBoss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    718 GT4 is probably my favorite new porsche, btw what was that road you were driving on

    • @shitsandwich1983
      @shitsandwich1983 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      it looks like the historic columbia river highway