It's all relative and really depends on what you're looking for. In conclusion, there are many possible choices! You are the one to decide what is right for you
Hi Tomas, its the story which makes an image camera actually is only 10 -15 % of final image.. But that said when we are buying a camera we should expect a camera manufacturer to give us their best as we will give our best to our clients, Now what I do want to point out is 6D2 which has royally pissed me off. Its jury rigged product which should not have been made and would/will give me poorer return for my hard earned money.. So to all I would really recommend to go for cheapest relevant camera and get the best lens.. I don't know why I wrote this..
Anil Maurya I completely agree with you about Canon 6D Mark II. Unfortunately it's no good choice right now from Canon you have to go for 5D Mark IV if you want to good pro camera.
@Anil: It's called business Anil. If Canon puts all the goods on the 6Dmk2 who the hell is crazy enough to buy the 5D4 and the 1Dx2 you get what i mean? Reason why the 6Dmk2 is a single SD camera as to the dual card slot of the 5D4 that is reason enough for pros to buy the 5D4... the 1Dx has the full 4k capability as to the cropped 4k of the 5D4 it's not that they're cheating it just business.
it's a shame this video didn't discuss the IBIS that the SONY A7ii has. this is also the reason I as a 'young student starting out' chose for the A7ii because I can use my vintage Olympus Zuiko lenses with an adaptor and make use of the IBIS.
Dont drop the camera by any means, sometimes your camera just takes some damage when you are working and the canon cameras are built like bricks, my assistant drop my 5dmk2 right of an open rucksack to the sideway and nothing happend just a little scratch, i rather use a rig, or a stabilizer but go for a camera built like a tank.
@@trisv1974 my a7ii fell of a tripod then proceeded to roll down some stairs. Both lens and camera survived the fall (Nikon 50 1.4 ai). They may not be made as tanky as DSLRs but they aren't legos either.
@R-77 I don't film often but for pictures, it makes images even sharper for hand-held shots. Without having to spend extra money on lenses with image stabilization it's really nice. It makes night-time or evening photoshoots even more doable if you don't have a tripod
The A7II is moisture and dust resistant. Also, I think a "little" more people would choose the EVF over the GPS. Too bad you missed out the D750 from the comparison.
I personally haven't had any issues with the focus on my 6D Mark ii. In fact I find it to be one of the standouts on the camera. It's true that it has a little more contrast, so I dial it back by one. Against the 5D mark iii it has more magenta, but in general I've found the colours to be great. I believe the 6D Mark ii is sharper, and I do believe it's a little better in noise performance. And for the record I have a 5D ii 2x 5D iii and the 6D ii. So definitely had a good look at the difference. 6D ii is with me every day, even in 2020 I'm not ready for mirrorless and none of these camera's are dead yet. (5D mark ii still rocks)
I would go for 6d mark1(even second hand) and some better lens or two for $2000...that will give you more options than just the body for that amount. It's all about the skill and lens anyway...every body produced since 5d mark 1 will make a very god photo if you know how to shoot.
As many have said, there are lots of other options, Pentax K1, Nikon D750, Second hand D810 or D800. With the Pentax and Nikon both being new. I would also contend that the sensor in any of these cameras would be as good athe any of the camera, you have listed.
This is why I just got a 5DII when I upgraded to full frame. Even with a camera that old, basically the same image quality as a 5DIII up to ISO 400 or so... more than good enough. Although the focusing situation does suck. Though, you really can't pull up the shadows as much as with a 5DIII. That's fine if you know lighting and how to get your exposure right.
I’d absolutely go for the 5D mk III, it has more spread autofocus points, higher fps, similar price point and a heavy duty construction that can take anything
Nice video. 5D MkII in my opinión it's off the competition. ¿More expensive, heavier, and older processor? Next. Between this 3 options i'll go with the 6D MkII
I keep wondering why everyone always seems to think that more focus points are automatically better than fewer. If you don't have efficient ways to move quickly from edge to edge, the vast amount of focus points can be a disadvantage (especially for wedding and event photography). I much prefer my 5DIII over my A7rii because it's more efficient. I just can't see why most circumstances would require more than 50 focus points. This is one of the areas where I think people just get caught up on the specs without considering their feasibility in action.
That's a good point, Otto! I think it's also important to remember that everyone is going to have different things they are looking for in a camera and will value different specs more or less than others.
Oh, for sure. But I was trying to make a point about the idea that you can't necessarily draw a linear correlation between the number of focus points and technical quality (specs) of the camera. If you can't efficiently move across your screen and still focus on accurate/small bits of your frame, I think you're skipping a factor. I think operability of the focus points is part of the specs too.
Having a full range of focus points is really really nice, though, if your camera can move between them quickly. I got really used to the OM-D series, where it's super easy to move between focus points and they cover the frame. So now when I'm using my Canon DSLRs I'm always frustrated. I'm not familiar with some of the newer Sonys, but I found their first mirrorless installments, including when they started doing full frame, annoying because you can't move between the focus points nearly as quickly as on the OM-D series, though. So I do know what you're talking about!
sorry to disagree gentlemen, thank you for the video btw.. love all your videos. I have the 5d3 but the mk4- was such a disappoint that I decided instead to take that money and buy the a7ii instead of the mk4, to boot for the same money I also got a godox 4 speedlight wireless system and a strobe, two triggers one canon one Sony, then I got the 50mm art with the mc11 kit it was a steal I got it for about $50 more than the lens alone, throw in 4 extra batteries and the battery grip all for the price of the canon mk4 which came out with DR already in the mid teens of dxomark falling way behind 2+ year older cameras. the a7ii quickly became my main camera, and relegated the mk3 to back up. The 5axis, manual focus assist, focus peaking, zebras, WiFi, remote control, and so many more features including the ability to customize the buttons to my exact shooting style obliterated.. the canon.the dynamic range, i could never pull the shadows back or recover highlights on the canons without suffering severe banding and so many other artifacts. I use the Tamron trinity adapted with the mc11.. except for the 70-200mm in low light the others are bang on. and even then as soon as it starts to hunt, i just start turning the manual focus ring, and the focus peaking with the manual assist kicks on and bang I am there can even magnify at that point to confirm. I have never missed a shot yet. I was so impressed I went out and bought the a7rii. My other complaint with the video was if you are going to mention used prices than the Sony a7ii' s used price is extremely low, which doesn't make it even close. once you use an evf it is hard to go back to the meter even tho I was very good at judging the scene with the mk3. why guess? when you can nail it exactly the way you want the first time. When Canon releases the 6dii with lower DR and iso performance than its predecessor the 6d, it proves Canon is falling way behind in the sensor game. Wait till the next round of Sony a7's or a9's the gap will be gargantuan. I was a major canon fan when they wanted to be the best.. they no longer aim for that. Their last remaining areas of photography where they lead will be gone in the next few years, they are losing out on bodies, lenses, customers.. like the others I to would've liked to have seen the Nikons in there also, not to mention the Pentax k1 also fits the 2k range although I appreciate that would be a stretch... thanks again gentlemen, even tho I don't think the testing was scientific.. we did appreciate the effort.
Lots of specs and gear. I find that specs don't line up with photo quality. If you really want to get your point across, you should make a similar video.
Don't own these 3, but the images in this video shows 6dii is crap actually. I think these guys eyes have problems; that pink ground in the last comparison should give you all kinds of alarms if you claim to be "professional". And I am not a Sony fanboy. I bought rx100iv on friend's advice and thought it was a piece of shit in color, always blue somehow, and sold it, and prefered the much cheaper Canon powershot s100, (that one's color is also fake but more pleasing).
Lenses are cheaper for d810 (on average) but if you value portability I say definitely go for the ar7ii. As far as image quality, I feel as though the differences between the two cameras isn't big enough to pick a clear winner in that aspect. Bottom line both are fantastic cameras
This was a helpful video, and I enjoyed watching it. However, contrary to a couple of tangential statements, the 7D Mark II has GPS built in. The 5D Mark IV has WiFi.
I still shoot with the 5DIII, in fact because I have upper body difficulties that make me clumsy I use a 5DII for landscapes, and I can officially report that the 5DII bounces well. It also lets me concentrate on my photography rather than worrying about damaging my camera. I think that camera should have been another entrant as a first full frame camera. To me if the camera gives you pleasure, you get great prints out of them and you can afford it, without crippling debt, then it’s the right camera for you. However, if I was buying my first full frame camera I think I’d go for the 6DII purely because it’s the most up to date technology from Canon and the choices of lenses available, but I’d also watch out for firmware updates. If I was advising anyone though I can only say what I know which is the 5DIII, but I’d suggest looking at the reviews online but avoid the comments under the TH-cam videos as these can be very vitriolic and infantile. I would suggest listening to people like yourself, who has been a successful photographer for many years and knows what he is talking about. I would also suggest watching you series about light, but that is a total aside. I think when people are spending a couple of thousand pounds they shouldn’t rush with a first purchase into that arena. Another factor to consider, if this is their first full frame camera, is have they previously had a cropped sensor camera, have they invested in a lot of glass and do they intend keeping it. So if they previously had a 80D they want to keep then it would be better to stay with Canon rather than the Sony. I know my 7DII has GPS, but it really it really eats into the battery and I always forget to turn it on. Gosh your audio must be amazing, I hid under the table when I heard the sirens, I thought they were outside my home coming for me. Another fantastic video, with sound common sense.
If your video convinced me of anything, it's definitely don't buy Canon 6dii. You clearly missed that a7ii had better dynamic range and shadow performance: starting from your "film noir" part; the 6dii you keep saying is good actually was clearly the worst of the 3 in image quality. And the Canon magenta looks quite fake especially on the 6d ii. The swimming pool over-exposed shot actually clearly shows your 6dii white balance is off making white pink, while the 5diii is better and maybe the Sony most accurate. And the skin tones you guys are showing in this video also look ridiculously fake.
How does the Canon EOS RP compare to these cameras? Especially the Sony A7 ii since they are both mirrorless and will take Canon glass and have more spread out focus points.? I currently have an original Canon 6D. I take a lot of low light band shots and need ISO 6400 performance, fast auto focus, and good dynamic range.
Very disappointing you did bother to include the Nikon D750, it has a superior auto focus system then all three cameras you tested, it has superiors dynamic range to the Canons are slightly better then the A7II which they share same sensor, it has dual slot card and enjoys Nikon huge lens selection so I think its the better choice of these 3 and can be had today for under 2000$ new.
One thing to consider is the lens-choice and also the price of it! There are a LOT of great canon lenses that are quite affordable, especially used. Good Sony lenses are still rare and quite expensive. Of course you can use adapters, but most of the time with some compromises in usability/autofocus/reliability and such..
I've come to realize I am so old school. I started with my Dad's Minolta SRT-201 and his Minolta X-9 SLR's in the late 90's. I am still used to focusing what I want to take a photo of using the center focus point. Then moving it slightly to the left or right to properly frame it. I end up just setting my foucid point on the center and being done with it. In fact I still use those old MD mount Minolta lenses on my Canon DSLR's using an adapter.
Yep the A7 2 is my favourite . I also understand I can use canon lenses on the A7 and pretty much any lens I want FD Aswell as far batteries concerned bring extra? Thanks for this video very helpful
do you make custom profiles with the color chart for every scenario and camera? and if not... why not? I always make color profiles the eliminate as much "lens/sensor" color bias.
There is only full frame. There is nothing else. Well ok I have an 80D as well. But growing up shooting 35mm film all my life. I find it hard to shoot anything less.
8:53 her head is so much of a different angle, are you kidding? She's obviously picking up more light because her head is tilted up more for the 5d, come on, guys. Look at where her eyes are lining up.
Only that? None of the photos are made in the same conditions. They should have simply borrowed a friend or something and shoot in the exact moment with the same lens type. The light is just terrible. Also, the sony has some auto DR adjustment enabled by default. I moved from canon 5d2 to sony a7ii (which was only 1000eur btw) but I didn't took photos so bad with either camera.
Nikon Recalls the D750 a Third Time for the Same Shutter Issue, D750 is very good camera, i love it and plan to buy one for backup,(i got D800E, D810) but too much problem,
I really like your channel. You've provin to be non biased and gave a nice honest review of all three cameras. I already own the 5D3 But want something full frame that will auto focus on video. The 6D is my cheapest option. I just can't afford the EOS-R or the 5D4. I remember when some Indi Feature film makers where going wild ober using the 5D2 to make feauture films. Such as "The Silent House" and "Like Crazy" I prefer video production as well. That's why I bought the 5D3. But sometimes I just want to use my DSLR like a camcorder and let it do the focusing for me. Because it's not like I'm shooting a film and need to block a shot. Can't wait to see more of your videos.
The main thing us amateurs have to really consider is a camera brand ecosystem: lenses et al. Yes, adapters can help with that but there is often a loss of quality/function by using them (e.g. Canon lenses on Sony). As the knight said to Indiana Jones in Indiana Jones 3: "choose ... wisely ...".
Connor, have you used the G Master glass?? Sony has the better glass now and at least you CAN adapt the Canon lenses to Sony. It doesn't have as many choices in some niche areas, but they're slowly filling out their range. I think with the recent release of the A7 III, there's no comparison. Anyway, this was a great comparison, I love that they put the features to the side and only looked at image/sensor quality.
Martin Turner, HOW are you loosing quality using adapters? (Ones without correcting glas) Some kinds of adapters even have some autofocus possibilities,.
@@Legolasicek Have you used them? i mean really used them... not just tried out... i mean really use them... then you'd know they do not respond like using native lenses... or native adapters like EF to EOS M or the EF to Eos R adapter.
How come a professional photographer giving advice between 2 cameras was obsessed with the DANM GPS people want to learn and care about which of the 3 would given them the better photos and videos quality what do i care about a DANM GPS🙄
Bad way to test these cameras. First of all the window test. You stated that the A7ii was more hot and brighter than the other two cameras but what settings did you have and ISO?
I was looking for an upgrade from the original 7D, and was waiting for the 6D2, but the moment I heard it had 1 card slot, I ordered a 5d3 almost immediately because of the dual card slots, a widerish AF spread and I was not going to support Canon by buying the 5D4 and wait for the 5D5 (unless thats also a disappointment.)
I think D750 would be easily the best choice for FF under 2k$ (and that's coming from Canon/Fuji shooter). Regarding these camera models up in the video, it's really hard to distinguish ISO differences with poor YT compression, but seems like 6D2 is a tiny bit ahead, but it's really close, so ISO shouldn't be main reason to decide about purchase. Regarding colors I see a little difference in skin tones hues between Canons with 5D3 being my favorite, 6D2 second and Sony after that, but I think Sony was constantly exposing better shots with more DR, while Canon (as always with any Canon DSLR camera) was burning highlights too easy. Regarding DR push at @11:00 mark, you can easily see in deep shadow details of her hair (her left shoulder) how much noise Canons have compared to Sony. One more thing I would like to see tested would be AF accuracy through viewfinder (with consistency of accuracy included) where I think Sony would come first (being mirrorless) and 5D3 would be second being known for reliable AF (if you account AFMA may needed for certain lenses ). Overall all 3 cameras has some advantages/disadvantages over other ones. 6D2 Pros: Dual Pixel AF, GPS, flip screen, lightweight, wifi+BT 6D2 Cons: Not really and improvement over (much cheaper) 6D1 in IQ and DR which makes it really expensive purchase, (still the same) soft 1080p video (from 5 years ago with even lower bitrate), no 4K, AF points in VF too narrow, no Spot AF point in VF, no dual slots for SD card, 1/4000 max shutter speed 5D3 Pros: Rugged and reliable DSLR with consistently accurate AF through VF, joystick for selecting AF points, dual card slots with fast CF card, optional Magic Lantern implementation, old (good) Canon colors look 5D3 Cons: old and expensive for 2017, no tilt/flip screen, heavy (but rugged), same soft 1080p video (but with Magic Lantern ability to shoot RAW should be considered, although it is really PITA for editing), low DR/ISO compared to Sony sensors in this price range. Sony A7II Pros: DR and more consistent and reliable exposure compared to other two cameras in this review, extended ISO 50 - 51200, eye AF works great through VF (good for portraits), single point AF very accurate, lightweight (but ergonomically not as fitting as Canon DSLRs), better 1080p with XAVC-S codec Sony A7II Cons: Sony color science is still lagging compared to Canon, Fuji, Olympus, Nikon (but easier to fix if shooting RAW), ergonomics not the best compared to other manufacturers (too much digging through menus), (good) Sony lenses are quite expensive and not smaller than Canon/Nikon counterparts with similar quality (but ability to use Canon lenses with AF over Metabones is certainly plus)
I think this was a video that finally asked the hard questions about camera selection. What you revealed was that cameras today produce superb images that are scarcely different from each other despite all the oohing and aaahing over noise and dynamic range. I had been hearing about the vaunted Sony DR for a year and finally did a side by side test with my 5DmkIII. Yes the Sony was good but so was the Canon. At plus 2 stops they were the same. Above that the Sony eked out an advantage in the shadows that grew as the ISO went up. However, as JP noted, if you are actually watching your exposures, 2 stops is a ton. As a working pro, the notion that I need a camera capable of an excellent 4 stop push means I am trying to sell abject failures to my client. My desire to upgrade is gone.
Heard a lot about the 6d mark ii being bad with focus but I shoot portraits where the subject will be around the middle anyway, so the 6d mark ii is a steal for me. Only thing I'm still trying to figure out is if the eos rp is better than the 6d mark ii.
That decision is based on the lenses you have and the direction you want to go. If you want to move to RF lenses then the rp is the best choice. It's the best direction for the future. Good Luck. You can't go wrong.
@@dwissba68 congrats man! I've been thinking of getting one too (still). Would you recommend it as a casual/enthusiast/travel camera? Really the only thing holding me back from getting it is the battery life, and i'm not sure if the autofocus is good enough or not.
Derrick Wade Well, with most mirrorless cameras there’s always the question of poor battery life. I have two other mirrorless cameras that are Fujifilm and I have the same issue with the batteries being drained quicker than other cameras I’ve had. But if you have a couple back up batteries you should be fine. I definitely recommend it for travel and for the enthusiast user. Also professional use.
Guys... about the AF system. The Sony does not have PDAF edget to edge. It is only present in the center area. This is why when you put an adapted lens on there that you are limited to the center to leverage the PDAF points. It is a different story when it comes to the A7RII. So for stills (non-moving objects), the outside area is usable for AF. As soon as your subject is moving around you are limited to the center area if you want to achieve good reliable and fast focus. Also.... though the body of the A7II is cheaper, that is quickly offset by the prices of the lenses. For example the canon 70-200 f2.8L IS II USM goes for about 2k while the sony is closer to 3k. Price point per price point the sony lenses will run you from 20% more expensive and up. For a full lens line up (trinity zooms) and 2-3 primes, you can easily get the 5DIV instead of the A7II. But if you really want sony... you will just have to save a bit more.
All of these are great cameras, but I personally decided to pony up a bit more money, and go for the Sony A99 II. Fantastic camera, 42MP at 12FPS, and a lot of good native Sony and Minolta a-mount lenses.
Why is the Nikon and the Pentax NOT in this comparison? “Similar features and price….” why would I choose between three cameras with similar features and price, instead of just similar price? Pentax for under US$1.900, (NEW), 36Mpx, PixelShift technology, IBIS, weather sealed, GPS, (with ALL GPS and 3D positioning data in the EXIF), AstroTracer, Wi-Fi, dual card slots, et al. Nikon D750??? Quite comparable with the two you selected. Of course, only the Pentax and the Nikon have dual card slots. There are four options brand new, more options if you buy used (but an unfair comparison). This video was seriously lacking. It does not discuss the BEST FF camera under $2,000, but the better of the two you looked at. That's right, the $2,300 doesn't count, and even if it did, Pentax, Sony and Nikon (New) are still better. Regarding colour shift, ① preferences, ② easily corrected in software, ③ preferences, ④ varies heavily with exposure on Canon systems (highlight colour shifts vs shadow colour shifts), ⑤ preferences. Did I mention easily corrected in software? Regarding weather sealing, the Sony α7 II is weather sealed. Furthermore, when it comes to outdoor glass, only Sony and Pentax tend to make them fully WR. Canon has some which are only fully WR when a filter is on the front, and Canon & Nikon have some which only seals ingress into the body, with a lens attached, but not ingress into the lens itself. When you want to make a good comparison of F-type systems under US$2,000, either do them all or none at all, and don't add in exemptions for what can be gotten used, unless you include all used options, without neglecting any new options. We learned nothing from this video regarding the BEST, because even if one of the two (or three) options was in fact the best, the fact that you left at least two options out, means we will never know).
Thanks for the feedback! Unfortunately we don't have the time or the expertise to know everything about every camera, instead we just have to use our imperfect knowledge and the best cameras around from our own point of view:)
I think the real determining factor is if she was wearing red lipstick or a plum lipstick. Because the A7II was the only one that consistently showed the lipstick as red.
greetings, sir, I'm from Indonesia, a wedding photographer. how much is the price for sony a7ii there sir? Which of the three cameras is good for wedding photos, sir?
If you want the best image quality the D810 is the camera to get for around $2000. It is far better than the cameras in this group and any DSLR or mirrorless on the market today except the D850 .
I came up with another problem concerning Canon equipping the 6D2 with outdated technology. I was setting up this camera for tethered shooting and was astounded that it has only the slow and antiquated USB 2.0 technology. Producing a camera in 2017 without at least USB 3.0 capability is simply inexcusable!
2020 now and the a7II can be found for U$ 998 (with 28-70 lens, two batteries, 64 sandisk sd card, lens cleaning kit and a bag). Will it be a good choice for today' s standard?
The 7D Mark II has a built-in GPS as well ... but it doesn't turn off with the Camera. If you don't disable the GPS before turning off the camera, it will continue to drain the battery until its dead. If the 6D Mark II has the same "feature," it's a battery killer that makes GPS unusable.
I have the 6d 2 and I used the gps during a 5 hour shoot. My battery was at about half when I started and it lasted till the end. It as also a 3rd party promaster battery. The battery went red just as I finished the shoot.
Whats with the Nikon D610? At B&H they list it NEW at under $2000 with a 24-85 Zoom! Does the Slanted Lens dislike Nikon because it has a problem? Did I miss a video showing problems? A.,
I can't figure out how you guys have 358k subscribers, first and last video I have ever going to see in your channel, sadly it was a wasting of time. Keep trying!
aaaaannnnddd the new Sony A73 blows them all out, not gonna ditch my 80D any time soon, but when I do I'll be taking a long look at the new Sony cameras for sure
"...there is no conclusion." Brilliant. That's 20 minutes of my life I want back.
It's all relative and really depends on what you're looking for. In conclusion, there are many possible choices! You are the one to decide what is right for you
Your conclusion is the conclusion.
Her expression on her face... "I have no clue what they are talking about, oh well I'll just sit here and smile" 😂
Basically even five year old camera can give you great images if you can't get good images with any of these cameras blame yourself.
Hi Tomas, its the story which makes an image camera actually is only 10 -15 % of final image.. But that said when we are buying a camera we should expect a camera manufacturer to give us their best as we will give our best to our clients, Now what I do want to point out is 6D2 which has royally pissed me off. Its jury rigged product which should not have been made and would/will give me poorer return for my hard earned money.. So to all I would really recommend to go for cheapest relevant camera and get the best lens..
I don't know why I wrote this..
Anil Maurya I completely agree with you about Canon 6D Mark II. Unfortunately it's no good choice right now from Canon you have to go for 5D Mark IV if you want to good pro camera.
@Anil: It's called business Anil. If Canon puts all the goods on the 6Dmk2 who the hell is crazy enough to buy the 5D4 and the 1Dx2 you get what i mean? Reason why the 6Dmk2 is a single SD camera as to the dual card slot of the 5D4 that is reason enough for pros to buy the 5D4... the 1Dx has the full 4k capability as to the cropped 4k of the 5D4 it's not that they're cheating it just business.
truknayr23 I know, and its the business with me.. So they lost me to A7R2 .. I am extremely happy with that camera.
@@anil1svnit Fast forward to this year! hahaha 6Dmk2 is actually selling like crazy. Canon did not miss you one bit.
A7ii is sharp
Yes! ❤️
it's a shame this video didn't discuss the IBIS that the SONY A7ii has. this is also the reason I as a 'young student starting out' chose for the A7ii because I can use my vintage Olympus Zuiko lenses with an adaptor and make use of the IBIS.
Dont drop the camera by any means, sometimes your camera just takes some damage when you are working and the canon cameras are built like bricks, my assistant drop my 5dmk2 right of an open rucksack to the sideway and nothing happend just a little scratch, i rather use a rig, or a stabilizer but go for a camera built like a tank.
@@trisv1974 my a7ii fell of a tripod then proceeded to roll down some stairs. Both lens and camera survived the fall (Nikon 50 1.4 ai). They may not be made as tanky as DSLRs but they aren't legos either.
Like IS is image stabilization in a lens , IBIS stands for in body image stabilization. So basically stabilazation within the camera body
@R-77 I don't film often but for pictures, it makes images even sharper for hand-held shots. Without having to spend extra money on lenses with image stabilization it's really nice. It makes night-time or evening photoshoots even more doable if you don't have a tripod
The A7II is moisture and dust resistant. Also, I think a "little" more people would choose the EVF over the GPS.
Too bad you missed out the D750 from the comparison.
Agree D750 is a workforce
ooooh...good question!
I personally haven't had any issues with the focus on my 6D Mark ii. In fact I find it to be one of the standouts on the camera. It's true that it has a little more contrast, so I dial it back by one. Against the 5D mark iii it has more magenta, but in general I've found the colours to be great. I believe the 6D Mark ii is sharper, and I do believe it's a little better in noise performance. And for the record I have a 5D ii 2x 5D iii and the 6D ii. So definitely had a good look at the difference. 6D ii is with me every day, even in 2020 I'm not ready for mirrorless and none of these camera's are dead yet. (5D mark ii still rocks)
You definitely know your stuff. Thanks for sharing your views.
I would go for 6d mark1(even second hand) and some better lens or two for $2000...that will give you more options than just the body for that amount. It's all about the skill and lens anyway...every body produced since 5d mark 1 will make a very god photo if you know how to shoot.
That's reassuring - I just bought the 6D2.
I honestly thought my 5D III was far from competition against the a7rii and the 6d2, so glad I watched this :) propably saved me a lot 👍
Still in love with my 6D
Don't forget the D750!
As many have said, there are lots of other options, Pentax K1, Nikon D750, Second hand D810 or D800. With the Pentax and Nikon both being new. I would also contend that the sensor in any of these cameras would be as good athe any of the camera, you have listed.
This is why I just got a 5DII when I upgraded to full frame. Even with a camera that old, basically the same image quality as a 5DIII up to ISO 400 or so... more than good enough. Although the focusing situation does suck.
Though, you really can't pull up the shadows as much as with a 5DIII. That's fine if you know lighting and how to get your exposure right.
I have owned all 3 cameras, and I personally like the Canon 6d markii
F G which one has the best picture?
Adhyantoro Kusumo that honestly depends on your style of photography. All cameras are exceptional in photo quality, but it's whatever you prefer.
F G me too! My favorite so far canon 6d mark ii
I’d absolutely go for the 5D mk III, it has more spread autofocus points, higher fps, similar price point and a heavy duty construction that can take anything
I agree. I own one and am considering getting a second one.
The a7ll I believe does
Jeep Joseph in the end I went for the 6D2 because cheap and I’m not disappointed
If you want to compare... Please compose same frames
Nice video. 5D MkII in my opinión it's off the competition. ¿More expensive, heavier, and older processor? Next. Between this 3 options i'll go with the 6D MkII
I keep wondering why everyone always seems to think that more focus points are automatically better than fewer. If you don't have efficient ways to move quickly from edge to edge, the vast amount of focus points can be a disadvantage (especially for wedding and event photography). I much prefer my 5DIII over my A7rii because it's more efficient. I just can't see why most circumstances would require more than 50 focus points. This is one of the areas where I think people just get caught up on the specs without considering their feasibility in action.
That's a good point, Otto! I think it's also important to remember that everyone is going to have different things they are looking for in a camera and will value different specs more or less than others.
Oh, for sure. But I was trying to make a point about the idea that you can't necessarily draw a linear correlation between the number of focus points and technical quality (specs) of the camera. If you can't efficiently move across your screen and still focus on accurate/small bits of your frame, I think you're skipping a factor. I think operability of the focus points is part of the specs too.
Having a full range of focus points is really really nice, though, if your camera can move between them quickly. I got really used to the OM-D series, where it's super easy to move between focus points and they cover the frame. So now when I'm using my Canon DSLRs I'm always frustrated.
I'm not familiar with some of the newer Sonys, but I found their first mirrorless installments, including when they started doing full frame, annoying because you can't move between the focus points nearly as quickly as on the OM-D series, though. So I do know what you're talking about!
Great comparison. With similar picture quality, battery life, flip screen and weather sealing are most important to me.
Absolutely. Thanks for watching the camera comparison!
Small correction: @9:36 5D mark4 has GPS and Wifi/NFC built in.
The mark 4 wasnt in this vid because its 1000-1500 dollars over the other cameras
His reference was to their comment that even the mark iv doesn't have gps or wifi.
Lmao 4:25 "the Sony looks more yellow" 🤣 "you would expect"
Usually it is cooler. Thanks for watching!
sorry to disagree gentlemen, thank you for the video btw.. love all your videos. I have the 5d3 but the mk4- was such a disappoint that I decided instead to take that money and buy the a7ii instead of the mk4, to boot for the same money I also got a godox 4 speedlight wireless system and a strobe, two triggers one canon one Sony, then I got the 50mm art with the mc11 kit it was a steal I got it for about $50 more than the lens alone, throw in 4 extra batteries and the battery grip all for the price of the canon mk4 which came out with DR already in the mid teens of dxomark falling way behind 2+ year older cameras. the a7ii quickly became my main camera, and relegated the mk3 to back up. The 5axis, manual focus assist, focus peaking, zebras, WiFi, remote control, and so many more features including the ability to customize the buttons to my exact shooting style obliterated.. the canon.the dynamic range, i could never pull the shadows back or recover highlights on the canons without suffering severe banding and so many other artifacts. I use the Tamron trinity adapted with the mc11.. except for the 70-200mm in low light the others are bang on. and even then as soon as it starts to hunt, i just start turning the manual focus ring, and the focus peaking with the manual assist kicks on and bang I am there can even magnify at that point to confirm. I have never missed a shot yet. I was so impressed I went out and bought the a7rii. My other complaint with the video was if you are going to mention used prices than the Sony a7ii' s used price is extremely low, which doesn't make it even close. once you use an evf it is hard to go back to the meter even tho I was very good at judging the scene with the mk3. why guess? when you can nail it exactly the way you want the first time. When Canon releases the 6dii with lower DR and iso performance than its predecessor the 6d, it proves Canon is falling way behind in the sensor game. Wait till the next round of Sony a7's or a9's the gap will be gargantuan. I was a major canon fan when they wanted to be the best.. they no longer aim for that. Their last remaining areas of photography where they lead will be gone in the next few years, they are losing out on bodies, lenses, customers.. like the others I to would've liked to have seen the Nikons in there also, not to mention the Pentax k1 also fits the 2k range although I appreciate that would be a stretch... thanks again gentlemen, even tho I don't think the testing was scientific.. we did appreciate the effort.
So you went from a 5d3 to a7ii and thought it was a upgrade? I don't think you had a 5d3
Lots of specs and gear. I find that specs don't line up with photo quality. If you really want to get your point across, you should make a similar video.
Don't own these 3, but the images in this video shows 6dii is crap actually. I think these guys eyes have problems; that pink ground in the last comparison should give you all kinds of alarms if you claim to be "professional". And I am not a Sony fanboy. I bought rx100iv on friend's advice and thought it was a piece of shit in color, always blue somehow, and sold it, and prefered the much cheaper Canon powershot s100, (that one's color is also fake but more pleasing).
@@CO8848_2 Akki Moto
1 year ago
The pink in 6D2 is a problem with Lightroom. In Photoshop with RAW 9.12.1 is this no longer exist.
a good comparison video. thank you all and keep it up.
I got a used Nikon d810 for $1900 last year with 4k shutter
Kenric Martinez you can also get a Sony a7rii used for under 2000
Lenses are cheaper for d810 (on average) but if you value portability I say definitely go for the ar7ii. As far as image quality, I feel as though the differences between the two cameras isn't big enough to pick a clear winner in that aspect. Bottom line both are fantastic cameras
it is all about lenses. these full frame line up is just sooooo good until lenses only makes them much difference
This was a helpful video, and I enjoyed watching it. However, contrary to a couple of tangential statements, the 7D Mark II has GPS built in. The 5D Mark IV has WiFi.
You did not mention the IBIS in the Sony System
Hey Jay, the 5D IV DOES have WiFi! :)
And is double the price :)
I still shoot with the 5DIII, in fact because I have upper body difficulties that make me clumsy I use a 5DII for landscapes, and I can officially report that the 5DII bounces well. It also lets me concentrate on my photography rather than worrying about damaging my camera. I think that camera should have been another entrant as a first full frame camera. To me if the camera gives you pleasure, you get great prints out of them and you can afford it, without crippling debt, then it’s the right camera for you. However, if I was buying my first full frame camera I think I’d go for the 6DII purely because it’s the most up to date technology from Canon and the choices of lenses available, but I’d also watch out for firmware updates. If I was advising anyone though I can only say what I know which is the 5DIII, but I’d suggest looking at the reviews online but avoid the comments under the TH-cam videos as these can be very vitriolic and infantile. I would suggest listening to people like yourself, who has been a successful photographer for many years and knows what he is talking about. I would also suggest watching you series about light, but that is a total aside. I think when people are spending a couple of thousand pounds they shouldn’t rush with a first purchase into that arena. Another factor to consider, if this is their first full frame camera, is have they previously had a cropped sensor camera, have they invested in a lot of glass and do they intend keeping it. So if they previously had a 80D they want to keep then it would be better to stay with Canon rather than the Sony.
I know my 7DII has GPS, but it really it really eats into the battery and I always forget to turn it on.
Gosh your audio must be amazing, I hid under the table when I heard the sirens, I thought they were outside my home coming for me. Another fantastic video, with sound common sense.
If your video convinced me of anything, it's definitely don't buy Canon 6dii. You clearly missed that a7ii had better dynamic range and shadow performance: starting from your "film noir" part; the 6dii you keep saying is good actually was clearly the worst of the 3 in image quality. And the Canon magenta looks quite fake especially on the 6d ii. The swimming pool over-exposed shot actually clearly shows your 6dii white balance is off making white pink, while the 5diii is better and maybe the Sony most accurate. And the skin tones you guys are showing in this video also look ridiculously fake.
I have had both- love the fully articulating screen and the menu system on the Canon.
Good to hear. Thanks for sharing!
Im confused...a7r2 in the description and is a7ii in the title...
How does the Canon EOS RP compare to these cameras? Especially the Sony A7 ii since they are both mirrorless and will take Canon glass and have more spread out focus points.? I currently have an original Canon 6D. I take a lot of low light band shots and need ISO 6400 performance, fast auto focus, and good dynamic range.
Very disappointing you did bother to include the Nikon D750, it has a superior auto focus system then all three cameras you tested, it has superiors dynamic range to the Canons are slightly better then the A7II which they share same sensor, it has dual slot card and enjoys Nikon huge lens selection so I think its the better choice of these 3 and can be had today for under 2000$ new.
One thing to consider is the lens-choice and also the price of it! There are a LOT of great canon lenses that are quite affordable, especially used. Good Sony lenses are still rare and quite expensive. Of course you can use adapters, but most of the time with some compromises in usability/autofocus/reliability and such..
for me the 6d2 is a great all rounder
Thanks for sharing with us, do you own it currently?
yeah i decided to get it recently
I've come to realize I am so old school. I started with my Dad's Minolta SRT-201 and his Minolta X-9 SLR's in the late 90's. I am still used to focusing what I want to take a photo of using the center focus point. Then moving it slightly to the left or right to properly frame it. I end up just setting my foucid point on the center and being done with it. In fact I still use those old MD mount Minolta lenses on my Canon DSLR's using an adapter.
we want a video about Nikon D750 , Please .
Yep the A7 2 is my favourite . I also understand I can use canon lenses on the A7 and pretty much any lens I want FD Aswell as far batteries concerned bring extra? Thanks for this video very helpful
You should compare with their native 50 f1.8s.
"Only $2,000"
Lmaooo, same
Not sure if it's my screen, but the Sony looks a tad green. Nothing that can't be dealt with in post, but just something I noticed :)
CyphDK greenish yellow. Their color sucks compared to canon
do you make custom profiles with the color chart for every scenario and camera? and if not... why not? I always make color profiles the eliminate as much "lens/sensor" color bias.
By the thumbnail I thought this was a star wars comparison on R2 units.
what about Nikon D750?
גם אני מתלבט אחי (אני נראה לי בסוף לא הלך על ה6D מארק 2)
I think the pink in 6D2 is a problem in Lightroom, in Photoshop with Raw 9.12.1 is this not exist (LR has 9.12).
Please do a comparison between the 6D Mark ii and the Nikon D750 for image quality mainly!!
I’ve had experience with all 3 of those cameras, and of the 3, the best one easily is the Nikon D750.
There is only full frame. There is nothing else. Well ok I have an 80D as well. But growing up shooting 35mm film all my life. I find it hard to shoot anything less.
8:53 her head is so much of a different angle, are you kidding? She's obviously picking up more light because her head is tilted up more for the 5d, come on, guys. Look at where her eyes are lining up.
Only that? None of the photos are made in the same conditions. They should have simply borrowed a friend or something and shoot in the exact moment with the same lens type. The light is just terrible. Also, the sony has some auto DR adjustment enabled by default. I moved from canon 5d2 to sony a7ii (which was only 1000eur btw) but I didn't took photos so bad with either camera.
her face expression in a7ii picture " what a small pocket, cheap and entry level camera is that"
No D750?
My exact though !
It is the obvious winner, why make a video on something you already know the answer
cameradecision.com/compare/Nikon-D750-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III
snapsort.com/compare/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III-vs-Nikon-D750
cameradecision.com/compare/Canon-EOS-6D-Mark-II-vs-Nikon-D750
snapsort.com/compare/Canon-EOS-6D-vs-Nikon-D750
cameradecision.com/compare/Sony-Alpha-7-II-vs-Nikon-D750
snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-D750-vs-Sony-Alpha-7-II
www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-A7-II-versus-Nikon-D750___996_975
yes d750 best++
Nikon Recalls the D750 a Third Time for the Same Shutter Issue, D750 is very good camera, i love it and plan to buy one for backup,(i got D800E, D810) but too much problem,
nikon sucks :P
Which one better for photo ???
I really like your channel. You've provin to be non biased and gave a nice honest review of all three cameras. I already own the 5D3 But want something full frame that will auto focus on video. The 6D is my cheapest option. I just can't afford the EOS-R or the 5D4. I remember when some Indi Feature film makers where going wild ober using the 5D2 to make feauture films. Such as "The Silent House" and "Like Crazy" I prefer video production as well. That's why I bought the 5D3. But sometimes I just want to use my DSLR like a camcorder and let it do the focusing for me. Because it's not like I'm shooting a film and need to block a shot. Can't wait to see more of your videos.
The main thing us amateurs have to really consider is a camera brand ecosystem: lenses et al. Yes, adapters can help with that but there is often a loss of quality/function by using them (e.g. Canon lenses on Sony). As the knight said to Indiana Jones in Indiana Jones 3: "choose ... wisely ...".
Exactly. Canon may disappoint me at times with their bodies, but that sweet sweet L glass without having to use an adapter... yummmmm
Connor, have you used the G Master glass?? Sony has the better glass now and at least you CAN adapt the Canon lenses to Sony. It doesn't have as many choices in some niche areas, but they're slowly filling out their range. I think with the recent release of the A7 III, there's no comparison. Anyway, this was a great comparison, I love that they put the features to the side and only looked at image/sensor quality.
Martin Turner, HOW are you loosing quality using adapters? (Ones without correcting glas)
Some kinds of adapters even have some autofocus possibilities,.
@@brois841 GMaster is good yes.... but the price GEEZUS!!! hahaha... I'd stick with the Variety Canon has to offer.
@@Legolasicek Have you used them? i mean really used them... not just tried out... i mean really use them... then you'd know they do not respond like using native lenses... or native adapters like EF to EOS M or the EF to Eos R adapter.
can you please link us the raw files of the 3 cameras? thanks guys
How come a professional photographer giving advice between 2 cameras was obsessed with the DANM GPS people want to learn and care about which of the 3 would given them the better photos and videos quality what do i care about a DANM GPS🙄
I know right!!
Bad way to test these cameras. First of all the window test. You stated that the A7ii was more hot and brighter than the other two cameras but what settings did you have and ISO?
You can use a power bank instead of all the batterys.
for 7 ii ?
Nice work guys
Thanks Alexandre! We post camera comparisons every month. Got any suggestions for the next months that you would be interested in seeing?
i don´t know, i have 6dii, but i would like to see 1dx canon x others. thanks
We did one on the 1DX and some others! You can check it out here: th-cam.com/video/shPXMXV7dd8/w-d-xo.html
Let us know if this helps!
Both Canons looked over exposed (highlights blown out) but performed better at high ISO.
I was looking for an upgrade from the original 7D, and was waiting for the 6D2, but the moment I heard it had 1 card slot, I ordered a 5d3 almost immediately because of the dual card slots, a widerish AF spread and I was not going to support Canon by buying the 5D4 and wait for the 5D5 (unless thats also a disappointment.)
It is now 2018, and I got my first camera. I’ve upgraded from my iPhone X to a Sony A7II.
Woohoo! Let us know how you like it!
TYler_ SChecter how is it holding up so far?
I think D750 would be easily the best choice for FF under 2k$ (and that's coming from Canon/Fuji shooter).
Regarding these camera models up in the video, it's really hard to distinguish ISO differences with poor YT compression, but seems like 6D2 is a tiny bit ahead, but it's really close, so ISO shouldn't be main reason to decide about purchase.
Regarding colors I see a little difference in skin tones hues between Canons with 5D3 being my favorite, 6D2 second and Sony after that, but I think Sony was constantly exposing better shots with more DR, while Canon (as always with any Canon DSLR camera) was burning highlights too easy.
Regarding DR push at @11:00 mark, you can easily see in deep shadow details of her hair (her left shoulder) how much noise Canons have compared to Sony.
One more thing I would like to see tested would be AF accuracy through viewfinder (with consistency of accuracy included) where I think Sony would come first (being mirrorless) and 5D3 would be second being known for reliable AF (if you account AFMA may needed for certain lenses ).
Overall all 3 cameras has some advantages/disadvantages over other ones.
6D2 Pros: Dual Pixel AF, GPS, flip screen, lightweight, wifi+BT
6D2 Cons: Not really and improvement over (much cheaper) 6D1 in IQ and DR which makes it really expensive purchase, (still the same) soft 1080p video (from 5 years ago with even lower bitrate), no 4K, AF points in VF too narrow, no Spot AF point in VF, no dual slots for SD card, 1/4000 max shutter speed
5D3 Pros: Rugged and reliable DSLR with consistently accurate AF through VF, joystick for selecting AF points, dual card slots with fast CF card, optional Magic Lantern implementation, old (good) Canon colors look
5D3 Cons: old and expensive for 2017, no tilt/flip screen, heavy (but rugged), same soft 1080p video (but with Magic Lantern ability to shoot RAW should be considered, although it is really PITA for editing), low DR/ISO compared to Sony sensors in this price range.
Sony A7II Pros: DR and more consistent and reliable exposure compared to other two cameras in this review, extended ISO 50 - 51200, eye AF works great through VF (good for portraits), single point AF very accurate, lightweight (but ergonomically not as fitting as Canon DSLRs), better 1080p with XAVC-S codec
Sony A7II Cons: Sony color science is still lagging compared to Canon, Fuji, Olympus, Nikon (but easier to fix if shooting RAW), ergonomics not the best compared to other manufacturers (too much digging through menus), (good) Sony lenses are quite expensive and not smaller than Canon/Nikon counterparts with similar quality (but ability to use Canon lenses with AF over Metabones is certainly plus)
I think this was a video that finally asked the hard questions about camera selection. What you revealed was that cameras today produce superb images that are scarcely different from each other despite all the oohing and aaahing over noise and dynamic range.
I had been hearing about the vaunted Sony DR for a year and finally did a side by side test with my 5DmkIII. Yes the Sony was good but so was the Canon.
At plus 2 stops they were the same. Above that the Sony eked out an advantage in the shadows that grew as the ISO went up. However, as JP noted, if you are actually watching your exposures, 2 stops is a ton.
As a working pro, the notion that I need a camera capable of an excellent 4 stop push means I am trying to sell abject failures to my client.
My desire to upgrade is gone.
Heard a lot about the 6d mark ii being bad with focus but I shoot portraits where the subject will be around the middle anyway, so the 6d mark ii is a steal for me. Only thing I'm still trying to figure out is if the eos rp is better than the 6d mark ii.
That decision is based on the lenses you have and the direction you want to go. If you want to move to RF lenses then the rp is the best choice. It's the best direction for the future. Good Luck. You can't go wrong.
Great video.. But I hope to enroll the Nikon too..
No nikon?
Just letting you know that in your description you put Sony A7r II its not an r. :)
This video is tempting me to upgrade to the a7ii 😭
I just got the a7ii. Great camera!
@@dwissba68 congrats man! I've been thinking of getting one too (still). Would you recommend it as a casual/enthusiast/travel camera? Really the only thing holding me back from getting it is the battery life, and i'm not sure if the autofocus is good enough or not.
Derrick Wade Well, with most mirrorless cameras there’s always the question of poor battery life. I have two other mirrorless cameras that are Fujifilm and I have the same issue with the batteries being drained quicker than other cameras I’ve had. But if you have a couple back up batteries you should be fine.
I definitely recommend it for travel and for the enthusiast user. Also professional use.
Darin Wissbaum what about autofocus? I also want it for videos
J A It’s great for video it focuses automatically during video and everything turns out very sharp.
you maybe don't know but there is also a good full frame camera from the brand called Pentax: Pentax K-1
Guys... about the AF system. The Sony does not have PDAF edget to edge. It is only present in the center area. This is why when you put an adapted lens on there that you are limited to the center to leverage the PDAF points. It is a different story when it comes to the A7RII.
So for stills (non-moving objects), the outside area is usable for AF. As soon as your subject is moving around you are limited to the center area if you want to achieve good reliable and fast focus.
Also.... though the body of the A7II is cheaper, that is quickly offset by the prices of the lenses. For example the canon 70-200 f2.8L IS II USM goes for about 2k while the sony is closer to 3k. Price point per price point the sony lenses will run you from 20% more expensive and up. For a full lens line up (trinity zooms) and 2-3 primes, you can easily get the 5DIV instead of the A7II.
But if you really want sony... you will just have to save a bit more.
Super good points. Thanks for chiming in!
Haven’t even finished watching the video and this is one of the best videos out there on the photography comparison
Great! We are glad you found it so helpful, check out our most recent comparison here: th-cam.com/video/JJd51a8aI9M/w-d-xo.html
All of these are great cameras, but I personally decided to pony up a bit more money, and go for the Sony A99 II. Fantastic camera, 42MP at 12FPS, and a lot of good native Sony and Minolta a-mount lenses.
why didn't you include a Nikon ???
That pink shift from the 6D2 is scary. The Sony looked flat to me and definitely underexposed at higher ISO.
5D3 for me, please.
I agree completely.
The pink in 6D2 is a problem with Lightroom. In Photoshop with RAW 9.12.1 is this no longer exist.
Why is the Nikon and the Pentax NOT in this comparison? “Similar features and price….” why would I choose between three cameras with similar features and price, instead of just similar price?
Pentax for under US$1.900, (NEW), 36Mpx, PixelShift technology, IBIS, weather sealed, GPS, (with ALL GPS and 3D positioning data in the EXIF), AstroTracer, Wi-Fi, dual card slots, et al.
Nikon D750??? Quite comparable with the two you selected. Of course, only the Pentax and the Nikon have dual card slots.
There are four options brand new, more options if you buy used (but an unfair comparison). This video was seriously lacking. It does not discuss the BEST FF camera under $2,000, but the better of the two you looked at. That's right, the $2,300 doesn't count, and even if it did, Pentax, Sony and Nikon (New) are still better.
Regarding colour shift, ① preferences, ② easily corrected in software, ③ preferences, ④ varies heavily with exposure on Canon systems (highlight colour shifts vs shadow colour shifts), ⑤ preferences. Did I mention easily corrected in software?
Regarding weather sealing, the Sony α7 II is weather sealed. Furthermore, when it comes to outdoor glass, only Sony and Pentax tend to make them fully WR. Canon has some which are only fully WR when a filter is on the front, and Canon & Nikon have some which only seals ingress into the body, with a lens attached, but not ingress into the lens itself.
When you want to make a good comparison of F-type systems under US$2,000, either do them all or none at all, and don't add in exemptions for what can be gotten used, unless you include all used options, without neglecting any new options. We learned nothing from this video regarding the BEST, because even if one of the two (or three) options was in fact the best, the fact that you left at least two options out, means we will never know).
Thanks for the feedback! Unfortunately we don't have the time or the expertise to know everything about every camera, instead we just have to use our imperfect knowledge and the best cameras around from our own point of view:)
I think the real determining factor is if she was wearing red lipstick or a plum lipstick. Because the A7II was the only one that consistently showed the lipstick as red.
Why would you use the same lens?
greetings, sir, I'm from Indonesia, a wedding photographer. how much is the price for sony a7ii there sir? Which of the three cameras is good for wedding photos, sir?
Right now the A7 II is for sale at $1398: bhpho.to/36gyISk
If you want the best image quality the D810 is the camera to get for around $2000. It is far better than the cameras in this group and any DSLR or mirrorless on the market today except the D850 .
I’m halfway through this comparison and so far like the A72 . I’ll watch the rest
Nice review, not all of us are buying brand new cameras....
How about the Nikon d750?
You need to go 1:1 for ISO and sharpness comparisons.
guys - video - the 6D touch focus screen - one of the main things and you brushed over it - actually you didn't even mention that.
What about the lens??
I came up with another problem concerning Canon equipping the 6D2 with outdated technology. I was setting up this camera for tethered shooting and was astounded that it has only the slow and antiquated USB 2.0 technology. Producing a camera in 2017 without at least USB 3.0 capability is simply inexcusable!
2020 now and the a7II can be found for U$ 998 (with 28-70 lens, two batteries, 64 sandisk sd card, lens cleaning kit and a bag). Will it be a good choice for today' s standard?
It's a great camera that has great potential.
I believe the limited auto focusing points on the 6D 2 is a deal breaker . I'd like to see visually the limitations in a photo
We might have to delve a little deeper into the 6D2 for a future video, thanks for the suggestion!
The 7D Mark II has a built-in GPS as well ... but it doesn't turn off with the Camera. If you don't disable the GPS before turning off the camera, it will continue to drain the battery until its dead. If the 6D Mark II has the same "feature," it's a battery killer that makes GPS unusable.
I have the 6d 2 and I used the gps during a 5 hour shoot. My battery was at about half when I started and it lasted till the end. It as also a 3rd party promaster battery. The battery went red just as I finished the shoot.
You can decide. Either the GPS is automatically turned off or it stays on all the time.
I hate the grains in my shadow on ISO 100 on the 6D2.
What about less than $1k
So you're saying it doesn't matter?
You can pick up a used D810 for under 2K.
John J Yup, and it would stand out in that crowd.
Not to mention the D800 came out the same time as the 5D3 and can be had for $1000 or even less.
By far D810 is a great camera
Whats with the Nikon D610? At B&H they list it NEW at under $2000 with a 24-85 Zoom! Does the Slanted Lens dislike Nikon because it has a problem? Did I miss a video showing problems? A.,
You can also get a used A7RII, which is what I did.
I can't figure out how you guys have 358k subscribers, first and last video I have ever going to see in your channel, sadly it was a wasting of time. Keep trying!
aaaaannnnddd the new Sony A73 blows them all out, not gonna ditch my 80D any time soon, but when I do I'll be taking a long look at the new Sony cameras for sure
Those Sony cameras are bringing the game to a whole new level.
Completely unfair test without getting native lenses on all cameras.
I have the 5d mark 3. Still going strong