Not sure if I would have given the first yellow card. But hey, that’s up the the referee’s judgement. Now the second yellow card, I totally agree on. Player sarcastically claps to the referee which is disrespectful (dissent)
@@vanonzen It is not easy discussing football rules with people, who do not have an idea about it. Yellow card was given for a "tactical foul" and absolutely correct.
On the initial foul, note the AR had moved across the midline all the way to about the 40 yards line and has his left hand tapping his chest pocket. That is the typical signal for a yellow. By tapping the back pocket of the shorts is the signal for a red using hand communication. The AR and center are communicating at 1:04. Pace of game, previous fouls or interactions go into the use of a card.
Player comes straight for the player late after the ball has departed with no attempt to play the ball while working an attack. I am good with the first yellow. The dissent is a foregone conclusion and the player should have known better if this was a cup game.
Love how the referee has control of this game. Right at the start of the video he wants to get the game moving. It looks like he motions the thrower to stop wasting time. Possible off the ball foul at 0:20, but white regains possession. Good advantage played. Excellent advantage shortly afterwards on the offside position. Yes, the player was in an offside position, but the goalkeeper got possession and played to his team, no need to stop play. The referee doesn't want to interrupt the players momentum in the gameplay. For the main decision in this video, it's often easy for referees to give a call for a player who falls down. This referee clearly has experience, just because the white player fell, doesn't mean they were fouled. In this case, it is the opposite. The white player clearly played the man not the ball. In fact, he doesn't get anywhere near the ball, and it looks like his only focus is on stopping the player's attacking momentum. The referee blows the whistle loud and strong for this reason, and you can see him immediately move to his chest pocket (where he keeps his yellow card). He also gets on scene rather quickly. (I also want to mention the AR in this situation. Good job getting close to the scene. He is no longer needed in his position, so he goes further up the field than normal to assist the referee. It also appears as if he motions to his chest pocket, suggesting a yellow card to the referee. He also stops black #17 from playing a quick free kick, and then steps onto the field as he knows play won't be restarting.) He meets the player half way, shows the card with confidence, and explains it briefly. Easy decision for him with the dissent as well. Good strong whistle blasts and trying to get the player to meet with him. The only thing the referee did wrong in my opinion is meeting with that team's coach at the end of the video. Explain it to the coaches after the match. As I have been told working games, "they are not entitled to explanations." If you want to explain, do it after the match. Doing it now only makes them more likely to show abuse and get angry, as started as the referee walked away at 2:14. The coach looks upset. This is obviously a high stakes match, making my point even more clear. Emotions are high. Putting yourself that close to the coaches right after a red card decision isn't the best option. Explain after the game, if they still care about it. Finally, meeting with the 4th official is good. Great officiating from everyone involved. These are referees with experience, confidence.
On your point about talking to the coach, high school rules say the referee should explain yellow card decisions to the coach so the coach can correct the players action. I think it’s a stupid rule and can often lead to unnecessary conflict but that’s the rule.
I’ve accidentally given a couple of those fouls lol, he went in with the body and he did not get the ball at all. If he had won possession of the ball, however, that would have been a different story
I’m a soccer referee, so the player’s sarcastic clapping was unacceptable. The moral of what happened is if u don’t have something nice to a ref then just keep your mouth shut.
I think the yellow card was given for intentional pushing to the chest of the opponent, and the ejectable red card was for unsporting verbal dissent to a ref within earshot of hearing this unacceptable dissent.
Both are yellow cards as the first one was the white uniformed player made no play for the ball but his actions were to get physically in the way of player with ball! Second yellow card was verbal language calling the referee a cuss word is not acceptable! Red card to that player and now white uniform team plays rest of the game down one player! Great job punk!
First foul is a clear Stopping a Promising Attack (SPA) offense, thus a yellow card for Unsporting Behavior was issued, and the rest is made easy for the referee by the player.
how so? a proper throw in must be delivered from behind the head, facing the field of play, with part of both feet on or behind the line. These criteria are met here.
Definitely a yellow for taking the player out after he had knocked the ball forward and definitely a sending off for sarcastically clapping the ref. Kids a tool and should go do knitting instead.
Correct, it was hardly worth a word in his ear, let alone a caution - unless of course No.12 white had clocked up a few fouls previous to this one, then it would be justified for persistent foul play.
I'm going to do devil's advocate and state that the ref could've given a verbal warning instead of a second yellow. You hate to see a state tournament game decided on cards.
@@neilpountney9414 It's not uncommon in sports. You apply the standard in less important games to condition them when the big games come. But you then consider that one has the adrenaline going. I'm not faulting the ref. The player deserved it. But as a ref myself, I take an extra couple seconds to decide whether its warranted. Again, you want the game decided in game action not on ref decisions.
@@neilpountney9414 I don't agree with the first yellow. I see it as a careless foul, not enough force or egregious contact for me. Definitely not SPA. so a public word could have been used here instead.
never a yellow. second yellow, typical of narcissistic incompetent refs. accept you made a bad call, don't compound the error with ridiculous sending off. time to fix the problems in your life bud.
He ran into the player in black well after the ball was gone, right call said something walking away from the referee and got ejected for it. We’re also talking high school since you can’t tell so it’s a lot different to the pros just so you know in the future
@@tigerguy1013 if you think that's a card you've never played football. left winger playing kick and run doesn't have the ball under control, contact is light, and nearly shoulder-to-shoulder. unless this player has made a half a dozen previous fouls, it's never a booking. then sending someone for clapping at you, just shows that you're petty and incompetent.
@@Bigbagofgamer you don't ruin the game because someone said something to you. to me, unless there is a verbal threat, or physical contact, you don't send someone off for dissent. It's pissy and usually only leads to a more difficult to control and dangerous game.
@@gabrielantonio3418 it’s called disrespectfully addressing an official. Since you’re clearly slow I’ll explain: the referees are the authority on the field, if you disrespect them you get punished
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.77[2/2] "รับทราบ" แก๊งเพื่อนรัก 10 ปี ที่ไปไหนก็มีตำนาน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ifc0ofD51B0/mqdefault.jpg)
lmao these dudes just be kicking the ball up
Not sure if I would have given the first yellow card. But hey, that’s up the the referee’s judgement. Now the second yellow card, I totally agree on. Player sarcastically claps to the referee which is disrespectful (dissent)
I find the referee a dick, with a big ego.
@@vanonzen the referee was totally right
@@vanonzen It is not easy discussing football rules with people, who do not have an idea about it. Yellow card was given for a "tactical foul" and absolutely correct.
@@resi8507 exactly.
On the initial foul, note the AR had moved across the midline all the way to about the 40 yards line and has his left hand tapping his chest pocket. That is the typical signal for a yellow. By tapping the back pocket of the shorts is the signal for a red using hand communication. The AR and center are communicating at 1:04. Pace of game, previous fouls or interactions go into the use of a card.
Player comes straight for the player late after the ball has departed with no attempt to play the ball while working an attack. I am good with the first yellow. The dissent is a foregone conclusion and the player should have known better if this was a cup game.
never a first yellow
@@EggSandswag 1:19
@@sgttc15 what
@@sgttc15 14:37
There are two yellows. The first was the tackle, the second the dissent.
Seriously you don't see that?
So weird to see the game being played on an American football field
You’d be surprised how common that is though, especially when schools such as this one have turf fields that can have both sports
Yeah it sucks. The football fields are so small too. I had to play on a baseball field once in a tournament and it was living hell.
@@dylanlenze9500 you must not have seen that they have different lines for soccer and football fields
@@offbeatsofficial referee’s discretion
Love how the referee has control of this game.
Right at the start of the video he wants to get the game moving. It looks like he motions the thrower to stop wasting time.
Possible off the ball foul at 0:20, but white regains possession. Good advantage played.
Excellent advantage shortly afterwards on the offside position. Yes, the player was in an offside position, but the goalkeeper got possession and played to his team, no need to stop play. The referee doesn't want to interrupt the players momentum in the gameplay.
For the main decision in this video, it's often easy for referees to give a call for a player who falls down. This referee clearly has experience, just because the white player fell, doesn't mean they were fouled. In this case, it is the opposite. The white player clearly played the man not the ball. In fact, he doesn't get anywhere near the ball, and it looks like his only focus is on stopping the player's attacking momentum.
The referee blows the whistle loud and strong for this reason, and you can see him immediately move to his chest pocket (where he keeps his yellow card). He also gets on scene rather quickly. (I also want to mention the AR in this situation. Good job getting close to the scene. He is no longer needed in his position, so he goes further up the field than normal to assist the referee. It also appears as if he motions to his chest pocket, suggesting a yellow card to the referee. He also stops black #17 from playing a quick free kick, and then steps onto the field as he knows play won't be restarting.) He meets the player half way, shows the card with confidence, and explains it briefly.
Easy decision for him with the dissent as well. Good strong whistle blasts and trying to get the player to meet with him.
The only thing the referee did wrong in my opinion is meeting with that team's coach at the end of the video. Explain it to the coaches after the match. As I have been told working games, "they are not entitled to explanations." If you want to explain, do it after the match. Doing it now only makes them more likely to show abuse and get angry, as started as the referee walked away at 2:14. The coach looks upset. This is obviously a high stakes match, making my point even more clear. Emotions are high. Putting yourself that close to the coaches right after a red card decision isn't the best option. Explain after the game, if they still care about it.
Finally, meeting with the 4th official is good. Great officiating from everyone involved. These are referees with experience, confidence.
On your point about talking to the coach, high school rules say the referee should explain yellow card decisions to the coach so the coach can correct the players action. I think it’s a stupid rule and can often lead to unnecessary conflict but that’s the rule.
Not sure the first was needed, but the second 100% red everyday and twice on Sunday.
The first one was for him trying to push him and shoving him
I’ve accidentally given a couple of those fouls lol, he went in with the body and he did not get the ball at all. If he had won possession of the ball, however, that would have been a different story
Well done fellas
kid learned his lesson lmao
“ YEAHHHHHHHH”
❤🎉❤
This was a high school state semifinal game. White team (away) wins it in OT 2-1.
A clear initial yellow and a clear second yellow. End of discussion
1:28 that’s why u don’t talk back
He didn’t talk back he clapped after he got himself a yellow
Simple as, don’t speak back to the ref lol
Whats going on with the ref? Crossing his arms?
I’m gonna tell you right now. It was a big crowd at this game
Punk just learned that his mouth ain’t all that.
I’m a soccer referee, so the player’s sarcastic clapping was unacceptable. The moral of what happened is if u don’t have something nice to a ref then just keep your mouth shut.
I think the yellow card was given for intentional pushing to the chest of the opponent, and the ejectable red card was for unsporting verbal dissent to a ref within earshot of hearing this unacceptable dissent.
he go out like a girl :D
1:33 crowd goes so loud
Both are yellow cards as the first one was the white uniformed player made no play for the ball but his actions were to get physically in the way of player with ball! Second yellow card was verbal language calling the referee a cuss word is not acceptable! Red card to that player and now white uniform team plays rest of the game down one player! Great job punk!
why does the pitch look so thin
Artificial turf
Red is a bit soft
Never a yellow over here in England. If that was me if be fuming 😂
First foul is a clear Stopping a Promising Attack (SPA) offense, thus a yellow card for Unsporting Behavior was issued, and the rest is made easy for the referee by the player.
Captain D-bag #12
Good call. Buh Bye
This is not football pitch! This is american version of rugby called hottie rugby for princess.
It’s used for both moron, just because it has football lines and numbers doesn’t mean it can’t be used for soccer
Sounds like the parents to a 7 year olds match not teenagers 😂
are we gonna ignore where the goalie picked up the ball at 0:29 ?
Yes because he is obviously inside the yellow painted box.
@@johnnyutah482 lol
It was an offside call before that. Watch the bottom of the screen seconds before that, maybe 0:27
@@jillp1343 the AR put the flag up but the ref let it go as the player didn't affect the play
@@jillp1343 It was unnecessary to halt play - the goalkeeper had possession, so the referee allows the game to continue, 100% correct decision.
idk in your country but in europe that first foul is not yellow
Maybe in pro but high school is more strict
i mean its a foul throw in the first 3 seconds, pull it back to that and none of this would have happened lol
how so? a proper throw in must be delivered from behind the head, facing the field of play, with part of both feet on or behind the line. These criteria are met here.
Soccer refs may be softer than the actual players.
The first foul is NOT a yellow card.
Definitely a yellow for taking the player out after he had knocked the ball forward and definitely a sending off for sarcastically clapping the ref. Kids a tool and should go do knitting instead.
why a nfl feild
First off it’s not and NFL F I E L D, second of all, not all soccer teams play on a normal pitch
First yellow is a snowflake booking.
Nothing to do with safety. The challenge stopped a promising attack. Must be yellow.
Correct, it was hardly worth a word in his ear, let alone a caution - unless of course No.12 white had clocked up a few fouls previous to this one, then it would be justified for persistent foul play.
Guys, the defender trucked him. No attempt to play the ball. Reckless and cynical.
@@fwill620 he tries blocking the ball but hes too slow gettin there
@@EggSandswag tackling against an attack with no touch on the ball is a foul, plus it stopped the attack so it is a yellow
I'm going to do devil's advocate and state that the ref could've given a verbal warning instead of a second yellow. You hate to see a state tournament game decided on cards.
But you cannot apply the rules of the game based on the importance of the game you have to be consistent. His Red card was absolutely correct.
@@neilpountney9414 It's not uncommon in sports. You apply the standard in less important games to condition them when the big games come. But you then consider that one has the adrenaline going. I'm not faulting the ref. The player deserved it. But as a ref myself, I take an extra couple seconds to decide whether its warranted. Again, you want the game decided in game action not on ref decisions.
@@Kickingit06 had a similar one and the ref went crazy on me for asking about a goal that he didn’t count
@@alexanderalvarez6923 It sucks when refs decide games. Long story short, I had that happen to my team tonight.
@@neilpountney9414 I don't agree with the first yellow. I see it as a careless foul, not enough force or egregious contact for me. Definitely not SPA. so a public word could have been used here instead.
Bruh this vid is way to long just show the foul and card easy 30 - 40 second long vid
A sport Americans can't play and don't understand yet have far too much opinion on.
football in usa sucks
First yellow 100% mistake. Can't give yellow for that
america gay
lol you can’t even spell it right
@@Bigbagofgamer no
power tripping referee.. just as bad as the ones who are blind, also the first offense was not a yellow card
If you know so much then stop talking and start reffing
never a yellow. second yellow, typical of narcissistic incompetent refs. accept you made a bad call, don't compound the error with ridiculous sending off. time to fix the problems in your life bud.
He ran into the player in black well after the ball was gone, right call said something walking away from the referee and got ejected for it. We’re also talking high school since you can’t tell so it’s a lot different to the pros just so you know in the future
@@tigerguy1013 if you think that's a card you've never played football. left winger playing kick and run doesn't have the ball under control, contact is light, and nearly shoulder-to-shoulder. unless this player has made a half a dozen previous fouls, it's never a booking. then sending someone for clapping at you, just shows that you're petty and incompetent.
@@Bigbagofgamer you don't ruin the game because someone said something to you. to me, unless there is a verbal threat, or physical contact, you don't send someone off for dissent. It's pissy and usually only leads to a more difficult to control and dangerous game.
@@gabrielantonio3418 it’s called disrespectfully addressing an official. Since you’re clearly slow I’ll explain: the referees are the authority on the field, if you disrespect them you get punished
@@tigerguy1013 you're pretty good at being disrespectful yourself. Not the referees job to ruin the match because their feelings got an ouchy.
why are you red carding him for he just walked away