Even set in a fantasy land, it's supposed to be set in something like a historical period and no one ever bought clothing at a market. Everyone either made their own clothing (if you were poor) or had it made for them (if they were rich). Fabrics would have been bought at the market, but other than that it was all on the individual to sew their clothing.
But Belle never cared for cultural norms and never placed petty appearances over heart (she denied Gaston) she was seen as an outcast. Just check out her opening song "little town".
Actually scientifically speaking she would have been very pale, dirty,smelly and her hair, instead of being a gorgeous straight blonde wave would've been a disgusting mess if dirt, bugs, dandruff and dreadlocks along with her scalp being coated in a flakey later of dried blood as she was a very skinny girl and the weight of all that would've torn her scalp to peices
She says there are errors in the Disney movies yet there are so many errors in this video! LOL! Also in Disney's Mulan....Shang wasn't royalty, he took on the role of the Army's Captain because he was assigned to it by General Li; who was Shangs father. He was an army man, not a royal.
Bri I have a question, do you think that they were referring to when she almost married into the royal family of the other country? You know, in the sequel?
actually, ariel is danish. last time i checked, georgia is not in denmark. and, aurora is french, not british. mulan did NOT marry royalty. she was a warrior and fought for china. some of the princesses that were mentioned were pretty poor as well, so there would be no way in hell they'd be able to afford such fancy dresses. how much do you guys fact check these videos?
Thank you. The Little Mermaid one was really annoying me how wrong it was. I had to come back into the video from watching it earlier to comment on this. A quick Google can tell them that the little mermaid isn't based around Georgia and I'm also pretty certain that the date they have given Cinderella is wrong too and correct me if I'm wrong please, but she was French too as well as sleeping beauty.
thank you, I was just coming down here to say how most of these are wrong, and if you cant figure out the location with clues from the movie, how about going with the author/country of origin for the story. And what in hell would lead them to put Rapunzel...a clearly medieval story, into the regency era? But....the drawings and fashion are beautiful just not entirely accurate
@Rameesha . k we know that, we are just bothered on how she acts like she knew everything about social history but really doesn't and literally gives stereotypical misinformation to the viewers.
Wrong about Ariel. It was Hans Christian Andersen who wrote the story of the little mermaid, and the story happened in Denmark. Why do you think that we raised a monument of her in Copenhagen, in memory of the author and the sad story of the lovesick young mermaid?
AND! H. C. Andersen wrote the little mermaid in late 1800, so they should have gone for the Danish fashion in late 1800! jesus... Makes you wonder if they even did any research.
It's ALMOST like they themselves didn't bother to research while saying the animators that had to draw these characters over and over over thousands of times didn't so research. SURELY they can not be hypocrites that don't understand 2d animation at all and the work that goes into it. Why that would make them look very foolish indeed.
Exactly how is this Disney's fault? I don't believe Disney ever said it wasn't in Denmark; In fact i don't think they ever gave a location. The people on this channel made that assumption based off of lack of research and incorrect assumptions from 'context clues' they got from the show.
My school is named after a Native American princess (Daughter of the chief) who was forced to marry a man who my little brother's middle school is name after when she was like 12.
I disagree with the Belle one. Belle was way more into her books than into her looks. What was striking about her was her *natural* beauty and lack of necessity to rely on the fashion trends of the day.
Yikes yall really need to put more research and accuracy into these videos... Ariel is Danish, Aurora is French, Mulan did not marry into royalty, etc. etc. You also keep forgetting that many of these princesses were poor, or away from society, therefore wouldn't be dressing in royal/wealthy fashion...
Little Tuna I thought that too. Like when they said Belle would care more about her clothes. Belle wasn't wealthy, and just going by Belle's own personality, I wouldn't see her as the fashion driven type even if she had money. Do they not even know the actual characters in the movies? ^_- Tsk tsk people!
Jewel Waters Those comments about blacks and whites seemed unnecessary and slightly racist just to talk about what dress she should wear. Also who knows what a princess in 1920s New Orleans USA would have looked like.
Why all the dresses were over simplified in contrast with their historical counterparts? For the same reason Mickey Mouse and his friends are drawn with 4 fingers: *It saved up a lot of time and work for the animators.* Imagine yourself having to draw all those dresses in full detail, frame by frame, with a tight schedule back in the day. Same goes for 3D CGI graphics, helps avoid time constraints and clipping issues. The phrase "less is more" fully applies here for that reason.
Incorrect about Belle. She was the daughter of a simple inventor and her clothes would have matched that. To compare Belle's clothing to Marie Antoinette (who this video pictured) is ridiculous.
It makes me wonder if these people have even seen "Beauty and the Beast" if they think Belle should have been dressed like a wealthy woman. It's very clearly stated that Belle and her father were poor.
Anica Kyra Fajutag she doesn't marry until the end of the movie, and the beast was cut off from society so how would he have been able to provide the top fashions? She wouldn't have had the latest fashions until they were married and he became human at least.
There are a few things in this that are missing some points. Firstly Aroura was French and the dress she wore was made by the Fairies who were looking after her and they were living like peasants to hide her royalty for 16 years plus they decided to make the dress on her birthday so they didn't have time to make it all fancy and royalty like the Queen (her mother in the film). Next Ariel, her wedding dress in the film does have the mutton sleeves! Then you are comparing Tiana's swamp wedding dress to a casual dress of the 20s. The dress you should have compared is the dress she wore at the end of the film. Then again she is a princess by then. Next, Snow White was made a slave to the Queen who didn't want to make her look any beautiful than her so she would have given her basic clothes at the time or something to make her less royal than the Queen. With Cinderella, you should have compared Claire's image to the original design of Cinderella, not the evolved version which made every past Disney princess have so many sparkles on their dresses. And finally with Rapunzel, again like Aroura grew up like a peasant so of course, her dress won't be as fancy as the high class or royalty she is. I know it much but let's not forget that most of the Disney princess before 2000s were hand-drawn, imagine how hard it would be for the artists to draw frame by frame a dress with so much detail to match the era they were in, especially the classic princesses who drawn traditional, not digital. One more note, Mulan did not become a princess in the film. She becomes a princess due to Disney adding a new requirement of performing an act of heroism.
Neither Belle, Aurora or Rapunzel were supossed to resemble royalty with their outfits - with the latter 2 being lied to about their royal status. Also, Cinderella's dress was made by a friggin fairy - ofcourse it had to have glitter on it.
Jeffrey. Have you read the original Cinderella tale? Instead of a fairy godmother, Cinderella goes to a tree where her late mother is buried under. She either prays or recites a poem (there are different versions). The poem goes like this: "Shake, shake, Hazel Tree, Gold & Silver all over me". A golden shower falls onto her thus creating the dress & shoes fit to wear to a Royal Ball.
Rapunzel gets locked in a tower for 18 years with no contact to the outside world and most likely made the dress herself so naturally it’s obviously her fault for not knowing how to dress historically duh...
What? Mulan did _not_ marry into royalty! And I hope people realize the reason Disney characters designs are so simple is because they're going to have to animate them. To traditionally and fluently animate such detailed and intricate designs frame by frame would take a toll on any animator. This is why simple designs are important for 2D animation.
Lili Hurst no he was the generals son the emperor only has daughters if you rewatch the beginning of Mulan 1 and Mulan 2 you will see those things pointed out
This is wrong this is all wrong The little mermaid took place in DENMARK Sleeping Beauty took place in FRANCE Belle cared about her BOOKS more then her LOOKS and Mulan married a GENERAL not ROYALTY
I've read the story written by Hans Christian Andersen a hundred times and the mermaid was definitely a girl. The story is called 'Den Lille Havfrue' which means 'A little female mermaid', and it is the story which was adapted for the Disney animation movie. The original story doesn't have a happy ending - the mermaid dies letting the prince and his princess live.
As a dane, I can tell you that the story was indeed inspired by Hans Christian Andersens story “Den lille havfrue”, but the enviroment under the sea is nothing like ours. Most fish in the film are tropical, definitely not what we have here in Denmark. You would almost assume it was placed somewhere far from Denmark. And about the homosexual theory - some believe Hans wrote it to symbol how he was in love with a man, though it has never been confirmed I believe.
Masqueraded Potterhead Yes, that's true about the tropical fish and the sea. That's why I like our Russian cartoon "Русалочка" and also the film much more. To my mind these adaptations are truer to the original.
There is a LOT of innacuracies in this video. Many very obvious ones. Although what really put the cherry on top for me is when they used a Victorian image while describing the kind of fashion the era beauty and the best is set in would use. If real research had been done, this video wouldn't have been so abysmally misinformed to the point of making such a poor mistake. Not to mention, no offense to the artists but a lot of the 'realistic outfits' still where not realistic in the slightest. A good portion of them did not take the character's actual social ranking or personality into account either for example. Like again, Belle. She's not royalty, and not extremely well off. She's not poor nor middle class, a little bit higher I would say, but definitely not wealthy. Only the wealthy could afford the fashionable trends with powdered wigs and pastel colored gowns (wich was very popular in France mostly. Honestly the live action movie did a WAY better job at being a bit more historically accurate than this video). It's all just, horribly wrong and misinformed.
The reason all of the outfits aren’t historically accurate is one, they have to animate the scenes, and two, to make the dresses more appealing to children.
my thoughts also haha. Moreover, it's costly to animate those characters if it has complicated and detailed dresses. Those disney princesses are made for children not for adults, although, adults can still watch them.
Of course they do! It's called drugs... So, that just means a lot of people talking to animals (and they talk back) is a result people running around high.
In the Disney version, yes. However, in the original story, her father was a rich merchant. She had two sisters who asked for jewels and parasols and things like that, but she simply asked for a rose. Yes, she was down-to-earth and probably would not wear clothes like that until after she was married, but she wasn't completely broke.
Kristy Galbraith I thought that was part of the new Cinderella her stepsisters asked for jewels and parasols and she asked for a rose her father left became ill and died the rose was then given to Cinderella with the sad news that her father had died
In the new Cinderella, yes. But if you look up the original Beauty and the Beast, Belle has two sisters. The witch who cast the spell later turns them into statues outside the prince's castle, because of what they had done to her over the years.
I'm not sure why you would expect down to earth bookworm belle to follow fashion trends of england. It doesn't seems to fit with her character. She was not shallow or superficial in the slightest.
in that time period, keeping up with fashion would have been a fulltime job... especially for Disney's version of belle, where she was poor, and then shut in with the beast. Loving fashion isnt shallow. Having your life be about it when you arent working in the fashion industry is.
Being poor/lower class is the very reason why she wouldn't bother with fashion trends. Fashion trends of the time were set by the wealthy and those who wanted to appear wealthy and move into the upper class. Working class individuals did not have the time or money to spend on trends.
Princes and the Frog. Tiana DID dress according to her times in her daily clothes. Her costumes were just that - costumes. The wedding dress had also been tied into her being a frog at the time she married. She was in the middle of the bayou and the dress reflected that. I don't think nature gives a care about human fashion statements. It has it's own.
Not only that but just because her mother was an amazing seamstress doesn't mean she could afford to make the latest fashions for her. And considering she was marrying royalty, she needs something more elegant than what is essentially a cocktail/party dress
Well we know Tiana had the money for the some trendy dresses, based on the coffee can collection. But, she was also choosing to save thet for the restaurant, and lets face it, clothes are the 1st thing to get cut in a budget.
she actually didn't have much money, the ones on the ones in cans were all little pieces not worth much, so the total amount couldn't be so high even if they were so many - even if she hadn't decided to save her salary she couldn't afford anything but a fancy dress or two
Lilith Nicole which is what I said, and this would have been the 1920's, she's got at a minimum 50$ in those cans, probably more. That was a lot of money, sure it's not the stack of cash she got from catering the party, but it's not to be discounted easily.
I'm not saying she didn't have much or didn't work hard, but the money she had gained probably couldn't allow her to buy more than one or two fancy dresses even if she had decided to spend them on anything she wanted
Claiming that their fashion is “historically inaccurate”, yet so many things in this video were inaccurate...plus fairy tales and Disney movies aren’t meant to be accurate...also, why would Belle need to worry about the fashion of wealthy people if she was poor? Her fashion would have been different...
Oh em gee people give it a rest! Like this is supposed to be a fun video to compare what it would have looked like if they were real! Like sriously not that big of a deal.
Melissa: word. And Amalia, if they are going to criticize Disney for getting it wrong, even in fun, at least they could get most of it right. Which they didn't.
Wait.. Did they honestly say the artist just threw her hands up because the images she was getting for Mulan were from China...she's Chinese!! And she didn't marry isn't royalty, Shang was a military leader which would have made his family Nobel and high ranking but so was her family.
no , in china we didn't do that, loyal family member , you only can born with, or the girls married with a loyal man, you can't make it with, unless you successful rebel.
...Who expect historical accuracy in a disney animated fairy tale ? We have creatures that don't exist, but the clothing is supposed to be accurate ? You use a genie line to determine the Aladdin took place after the third century but ignore those referencing 20th century pop culture ?
And expecting Pocahontas to run around half naked would been a huge no go for a kids movie. As Jasmine clothes Disney want to show the beauty of their girls and a outfit that covers most her would not show her off as well plus the genie has been around forever and knew about Disney before the rest of the characters seem to
Holy whay! Ariel is based in Denmark!!! And the only reason ariel's dress had boofy shoulder pads is because the movie was made in the 1980s!!! Helloooo Lady Diana's dress???? It had nothing to do With the Edwardian era.....Which is early 20th btW.....not 1840s...ok bye
But the recent movie clearly depicts belle to be different from her peers especially in the beginning...the other women's clothing were elaborate and outrageous but she chose to be simple and modest
Just wanted to comment that I think disney did this on purpos because as we all know belle would never go with the trend. And the beast didn't even choose the outfit no she had a woredrobe where she chose her dress.
I think thetalko is wrong about belle since belle was showing that she is imperfect and that she didnt care about how she looked. Also Rapunzel was locked away in a tower for 18 years so how could have she knew what she was supposed to wear. I don't think thetalko really knows what they are talking about because clearly they didn't even know half of the stories.
i totally agree, and also, not nobody knows but a secondary meaning of the story is about homosexuality: the general seemed to be gay since he had fallen in love with someone who they thought was male. now, in the creator's idea he could also have fallen in love with "him" because he felt the "femininity" "he" actually somehow showed (I mean, it's impossible to TOTALLY fool someone about one's gender, some of your actual gender characteristics MUST slip out of the act) or maybe he was bisexual and not only liked men, so he was fine with Milan being a girl after all. And instead in the end he does marry a girl. Like, it seemed to be a message that homosexuality is fine and homosexuals should have the same rights and worth that straight people, along with the main women's right message, so why did they have to make him turn straight? I sincerely think they missed a good chance.
it's because at the beginning the story seemed to transmit the message that women do not only deserve equal rights to men, but that they are also worthy even if they are not married and they can do whatever they want with their lives (in China at the time this was totally absurd) and instead after all her effort to work her way up and show she was worthy by herself and she could do things that no one could think of just because she's a woman, she finally gets married to a man. why does the ending have to include her actually reaching what SOCIETY thinks is better, instead of just winning her personal war?
But Tina was poor so that is why she was not wearing what you described, her friend however her rich friend was wearing the right thing. For Snow White her stepmom had her working like a slave. Do you really think she would have put her step slave daughter in the latest fashion trends
Squishys, Slimes, DIYs, and more And Snow White’s stepmom didn’t like Snow White’s fairness so that would be another reason not to have her up with the latest fashion trends
I think that the outfits for the princesses were actually accurate, but were simplified. When the video shows the art comparison and movie comparison, they're quite similar. The art comparison is just more detailed than the movie comparison.
I'm not sure Rapunzel would have had a complete purple dress though since purple was pretty hard to come by for a long time. And she was not actually living like a princess for most of the movie. But other than that sure. :)
I do love the fanart depicting what their wardrobe would look as more historically accurate, it's stunning and, yes, honestly, prettier than Disneys. However, if I were, say Fairy Godmother, if I were to magically design someone's dress, I wouldn't say "what are the other girls wearing?" I'd rip something out from the future with my magic.
The narration sounds so condescending haha. I didn’t watch all of it but even if Belle wasn’t poor, I don’t remember her being written as materialistic as you believe the entire female population of 17th century France was.
it really did! It was so frustrating hearing them put down all of Disney's designs like that. Maybe the bigger picture is more important than accuracy, ok?
I’m sorry, but Genie saying “looks very third century.” Definitely does NOT give ANY hint whatsoever as to the time period. Genie literally talks about futuristic styles, technology, and people. He pretends carpet it a plane for a bit and turns into a Genie flight attendant. It’s so obvious
while you're right. all centuries even before islam in arabic culture,women (specially wealthy ones) wore loose modest clothing. if anything, hijab's idea is to bring about the common folk to the same equal level of royal women. loose and modest clothing in scorching heat and sun is the most common sense outfit to wear. You need to protect ur skin and let it air out. just sayin...she's absolutely right. as for exact period. the arabic story 1001 nights came about before islam...meaning at least before the 5/6th century.
Lots of the Disney versions actually make more sense and represent the character bettter. For example, Belle was a commoner and doesn't seem like the type to care about fasion, so her original understated look would suit better than tons of frills.
The whole reason Belle is wearing what she wears is because she didn’t want to look like the other girls. That’s why they say she has natural beauty. And in the live action, the three girls pining after Gaston are wearing historical accurate dresses and wigs
I know. The reason for her dressing as she did was such a major part of her character. Besides, she was also on the poorer side making the comparison completely inaccurate until after she was with the Beast.
In the 18th century, she would have been raped and been forced into prostitution if she had gone out in public dressed the way she is in the beginning of the film. That's what you're too fucking stupid to comprehend.
Belle could afford books that makes her at least middle class and not wearing at least a corset means she was going around half naked even poor laborers had at least one work corset considering she never worked and sat around all day reading books and that she could read definitely points to her father at least providing a mid to upper class up bringing. So either they came from money but were disgraced or his inventions at least brought in some income. In the movie she sings about the poor provincial town and the simple folk there that also points to her having been upper class compared to the peasants as despite her kindness she still looks down on them for living simple lives thats a arrogance anyone who has faced actuall peasantry would not have.
I mean, I think it's super fantastic that people are inspired to draw historically accurate, alternate universe, etc. etc. versions of the princesses... but honestly, I felt that the dialogue for this video came off more pretentious than educational. I wish they'd have been a bit more forgiving regarding fantasy characters designed to appeal and be graphically memorable to the modern families in the eras in which the films were released.
well Tiana was poor, so she couldnt afford dresses like that. she also had to save up for "Tiana's Place" Belle, again couldnt afford, and her town didnt look like it had a store for dresses like that, so instead of thinking of the times, think about the town, if the character is rich or poor jeez
penguin lover What do you mean she "can't afford" dress like that? It's suppose to be her transformed outfit after turning back into a human! Instead of a light green gown with a tiara, she wore a dark green knee-length dress with a pearl necklace and a feathery headband because magic transform her INTO that outfit in the end!!
"Rapunzel is based on a Germany children's book" but Aurora is from England and totally NOT based on a french children's book, neither Ariel based on a Denmark one. *Complains and get picky about historical facts* *Gets wrong facts about the original stories*
Just because the fairy tail comes from a certain region does not mean that the disneys movie take on it plays in that region. Just take the princess and the frog; It's loosely based on the fairy tail "Der Froschkönig" which is a fairy tail from germany. (as many are thanks to the brothers grimm) But I do agree that the video is based on poor research (they get many facts wrong) also love your profile pic, great taste :D
Totally right. Also, why the hell should she style her hair if her stepmother comes to brush them to gain immortality kinda often? And let's say it... if she styled her hair she would waste 4 hours a day for no one to see her. How do you even make that hairstyle out of 3 kilometers of hair
It couldn't have been any type actually. While she herself may have had no idea on how to dress, simply the types of clothes available would have been affected by the trends at that time.
Ummmmm.... the wrong facts about Sleeping Beauty, The Little Mermaid, and Mulan are cringe worthy. If you are going to make a video about such well known topics, at least do a little research.
Many anglophones (read northern americans) doesn't have a clue about Europe's history facts, blurring the end of medieval era to Napoleon conquests, (or something in this range). In BatB, Gaston character proven that French Revolution already happened, because hunting was a royal privilege since french monarchy beginnings. Baroque dresses was totally outdated in this time period, "no bras" dresses was the thing in peoples in ruling charge; and Belle ballgown just anticipated "[Monarchy]Restoration" dresses.
Omg I agree so much, the little mermaid was based in denmark, mulan is not a princess she married a general and belle did not care for the major fashion trends, they don’t know any of their facts! 😂
I see Claire Hummel made this video, Ariel is from Denmark there's even a statue in Copenhagen I think, Belle was poor but the yellow dress was accurate in the film, Mulan married a General not prince, I thought Aurora was from Germany and Rapunzel was CAPTIVE how was she supposed to know anything about fashion.
Why would she be English? Charles Perrault is french and in the animation it's said they live in a "far away land", often meaning an imaginary land anyway.
Juliane Pidde nope, I'm sure of it, I'm french and I learnt it in french class in 6eme (6th grade/Year 6 sorry I don't know where you're from x) ) BUT. It's inspire from the most horrible tale ever wich was italian though!
Rapunzel was locked up in a castle how the heck is she supposed to know what everybody else was wearing?!?! AND Ariel is a mermaid that lives underwater, every mermaid wears a shell bra in the ocean (like Ariel), and they have tails, how tf is she supposed to know how they wear outfits
It is commonly discussed among mer-philes whether mermaids would wear a seashell bra or not. Aside from foolish human modesty, one practical argument I heard _in favor_ of a seashell bra is that they protect the nipples and breasts from getting scratched easily when harvesting from the seafloor and dragging themselves onto rough tidal rocks! (If you accidentally scratch your own nipple, then- male or female- you can sympathize with this position!) Most ocean and salt-water-based materials would be quite abrasive to human-like skin and fish scales. Seashells are sharp, so they dig in to the breasts and would cut into any types of tying thread or seaweed they could muster! (Actual fishing nets would be an appropriate alternate if the threads were thin enough.) Using starfish is highly impractical, because they just crawl off, and some of them are poisonous! Oh, and since a starfish's mouth is in the center of its under-body, that means they're chomping down quite painfully on nipples! Using just Using straight seaweed as a bodice would not work either because it breaks down easily after being harvested, and collects fine particles of sand and dust which then becomes sandpaper-ish. Wait for a female traveler on the high seas to drown and then harvest the cloth materials? Considering merfolk easily number in the tens of thousands across the entire Northern Atlantic, those kinds of opportunities are few and far between; not practical to rely on regularly. The modern bikini swimsuit was not invented until 1946, though there is evidence minimalist two-piece outfits go back well over a thousand years in Europe. Wikipedia suggests they may have been used for athletic purposes in Ancient Greece in 1400 B.C.E. Most likely, real mermaids' breasts would be smaller and less dome-like compared to human females'. Or, if you want to completely remove all mammalian references, they wouldn't have breasts at all but perhaps better-developed chest muscles that lack the fat deposits. Depending on the temperature of the water where they live, overall body fat would make breasts larger/smaller by nature due to evolution.
Maybe Bell was a so called Nature's Child, those were in vogue in 17th century France, they were considered a deliberating contrast to the posy and artificially styled noble women.
Belle didnt care about beauty, and instead she cared about books. She was also living in a poor town, so she didnt have a lot of money to splurge on anyways, so Ya wrong, son
Actually when she marries into royalty in the end she DOES have money and she IS a queen, so she would dress fancily since at that time queens dressed to impress. *YA wrong, son*
Is it just me or was the entire moral of the movie to reject vanity and value inner beauty??? I doubt that after the ordeal Belle and the beast went through that they would jump straight into fashion don't you think?
Oh, and by the way - criticizing Aurora's outfit because it's wrong for a princess is a little silly when she spends most of the movie living in the forest as a PEASANT and not royalty. Her dress once she's back at the palace actually fits everything you're saying about the right dress. So maybe think a little more about what you're saying in order not to sound like you DIDN'T WATCH THE MOVIE?
Well no. The dress that "isn't right" was not made by magic at all. It's an ordinary peasant skirt, chemise, and bodice. The dress made by magic is the one that fits what the video says about a correct dress.
2:56 she can't dress like that if there are 5 year olds watching, she literally doesn't have a top on smh Also: 5:45 that wouldn't be a very good example for the young viewers making them think different races should be seperated
Aurora is French. Mulan did not marry into royalty, she married a general. She was already born into an upperclass family and lived during the Tang Dynasty.
But like dont the villagers just keep talking about how Belle isnt like most girls so i dont think she would take the time to dress like everyone else since she mostly spends her time caring for her father and self and reading
Tiana and her friend were raised together and babysat by Tiana mother... It wouldn't be far-fetched for them to be bffs... And considering big Daddy is whipped by his daughter, he would allow the friendshio
About Cinderella’s dress: She has worn in the second movie a historically accurate dress (more or less). She merely chose a much lighter, simpler dress (except for those sparkles) because they are much easier to move in.
b1njjj95 didn’t you not also watch the vid because you were interested in how the Disney princesses really ‘would’ve looked like’? I’m not trying to start a fight here but I think it’s unnecessary giving Silas D the fault for watching a vid
Personally, I'm fine with Tiana's dress. Claire Hummel's dress is more accurate for a _1920s flapper,_ yes, but for most of the movie (in which she's both human _and_ in formal wear) Tiana's either in a dress she borrowed from her friend Charlotte, who is _obsessed_ with all things related to the Classic Generic European Princess, or she is marrying/has just married Prince Naveen, which would naturally call for a big, fancy "princessy" wedding dress instead, and the fashion for wedding dresses up until relatively recently tend to revolve around a handful of more-or-less timeless traditional templates rather than the cutting edge of current formal fashion.
I agree with you! Also a lot of people don't realize that flappers were actually UNcommon, flapper fashion was a rebellion at the time, so generally only women on the cutting edge of fashion who were very interested in the looks of hollywood dressed that way. It makes sense for Charlotte since she's got a lot of money and an interest in those things, but not for Tiana. Additionally African American hair is very hard to manage at shorter lengths, so it's unlikely she would've bobbed it regardless! And, like you said, she wears very little of her own wardrobe in the movie, with her two costumes for the party, and her two work uniforms, her magical wedding dress of lilypads, and her second wedding dress from her human wedding (which is very much in the fashion)
i remember reading a short story from the time period that talked about how getting a bob was scandalous. the women that did it were treated akin to hookers. especially when you added the flapper dresses with their lack of 'proper' undergarments. and as you point out an African American woman wouldn't likely have hair that would bob anyway. without the weight of longer hair it would probably curl tight and be more of a 'fro.
don't they realize that belle was not like anyone and most likely did not care about how she looked or dressed, and she lived in the countryside so everyone there would have dressed MUCH more casual and all of these would have been when the princesses actually became royalty
Scramble Yes!!! I am this close [-] to seriously hurting who ever the heck made this freaking video. How can anyone be such an idiot??? None of the 'information' in this video is even remotely correct!!!!😠😠😠😠😠😠
Actually, with the exception of Jasmin, the dresses are pretty accurate. When you are drawing the animation frame by frame you need to simplify the details, otherwise, the production can be prolonged by years!
I think the wardrobe are just simplified so the animation process won't took so long. I mean imagine if belle's gown is like that, and they still have to animate the beast and the cutleries and others, we might not even have that epic "be our guest" scene.
Yeah, even if you want to base it off of the idea that Roses come from a certain place I am pretty sure that the roses next to my house were brought here by a Danish great grandma. They happen to be Danish roses. Without any research I personally always saw Hubert as kind of a jovial, butch Germanic or Danish fellow while Stephen struck me as an HRE or Spanish monarch. Their drinking scene has always been a favorite; reminds me of my two best friends.
Sleeping Beauty is a French Story. It happened in France. If you are going to be nitt picky at least get it right. Make the whole research! Before you throw sass at me, I have a Bachelors in History and I am half way through my masters in European history during the medieval times.
stella samuelsen English is my third lenguage, right after Spanish and Italian, so I don’t expect my grammar and spelling to be 100% right.Y si quiero te lo puedo demostrar pendeja! Scommetto che non puoi capire cuesto che scrivo Americana stupida! Prima di criticare altra persona semplicemente pensa, se cuesta persona ah piu educazzine da te.
What I have noticed is that the outfits of the princess in the Disney movies are more simple and less decorated than what they should have worn in their time, which I think that Disney wanted to say that you should wear what you like and don't have to wear the latest fashion and copy other but it's better to be comfortable with your own clothes, that's my theory 💜
The whole Ariel thing is totally bizzare. Georgia? There isn't a monarchy. Also, her dress sleeves in the wedding dress were much more 1890s Leg-o-Mutton than 1840s. The earlier pink dress was more like the earlier period. 1840s the leg o mutton started off the shoulder, and in the 1890s encompassed it. Also, when discussing Belle and French fashion, it flashes to pictures from the 1880s Bustle Period.
that's what I thought about along the whole video, like, some of the princesses weren't actually rich. and what about Cinderella? like, her dress was created by a fairy, it didn't HAVE to be fashionable for the time, it obviously just had to look amazing and some kind of magical. Also, I understand they are not historically accurate, but these are children movies and the characters must look cute and wonderfully beautiful, if they looked like 14th century princesses nobody would have loved them, cmon.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 88 | คู่เอก "ป้อมเพชร vs อัสลามจอน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZqTVVbMgbo/mqdefault.jpg)
Rapunzel was trapped in a tower. Her clothing was probably something her mother bought in the market so it wouldn’t have been very royal looking.
Even set in a fantasy land, it's supposed to be set in something like a historical period and no one ever bought clothing at a market. Everyone either made their own clothing (if you were poor) or had it made for them (if they were rich). Fabrics would have been bought at the market, but other than that it was all on the individual to sew their clothing.
Amanda Shirk okay well then her mom bought the fabric in a market and sewed the dress herself, either way it wouldn’t have looked royal
Grace Cruz lmao I love that scene
Lol
Jewel Waters ......... her fake mom Mother Gothel she would not give her clothes her real
mom made her baby clothes Rapunzel made teen clothes.
But Belle never cared for cultural norms and never placed petty appearances over heart (she denied Gaston)
she was seen as an outcast. Just check out her opening song "little town".
THAT'S IT. why the hell should she wear fancy clothes, she's not even rich.
THANK YOU. The whole moral of the story/movie is about how it's what's on the inside that counts.
Rebecca Feliciano Thank you!!
And in the remake, they do have historically accurate costumes in some parts, but it's mostly for comedic effect.
The song in the beginning of the movie is not called "Little Town" it's called "Belle"!
Repunzel lives locked in a tower... she likely would not have been able to do her hair in the fashion of her times
Exactly. And Mother Gothal uses her loose hair to climb up the tower. So if Repunzel tied it up, Mother Gothal wouldn't of been able to get up.
Actually scientifically speaking she would have been very pale, dirty,smelly and her hair, instead of being a gorgeous straight blonde wave would've been a disgusting mess if dirt, bugs, dandruff and dreadlocks along with her scalp being coated in a flakey later of dried blood as she was a very skinny girl and the weight of all that would've torn her scalp to peices
@@toni_macaroni8291 I-
She says there are errors in the Disney movies yet there are so many errors in this video! LOL! Also in Disney's Mulan....Shang wasn't royalty, he took on the role of the Army's Captain because he was assigned to it by General Li; who was Shangs father. He was an army man, not a royal.
Bri I have a question, do you think that they were referring to when she almost married into the royal family of the other country? You know, in the sequel?
actually, ariel is danish. last time i checked, georgia is not in denmark.
and, aurora is french, not british.
mulan did NOT marry royalty. she was a warrior and fought for china.
some of the princesses that were mentioned were pretty poor as well, so there would be no way in hell they'd be able to afford such fancy dresses.
how much do you guys fact check these videos?
#bubbleteakeith Très bonne remarque ! You're right
Thank you. The Little Mermaid one was really annoying me how wrong it was. I had to come back into the video from watching it earlier to comment on this.
A quick Google can tell them that the little mermaid isn't based around Georgia and I'm also pretty certain that the date they have given Cinderella is wrong too and correct me if I'm wrong please, but she was French too as well as sleeping beauty.
thank you, I was just coming down here to say how most of these are wrong, and if you cant figure out the location with clues from the movie, how about going with the author/country of origin for the story. And what in hell would lead them to put Rapunzel...a clearly medieval story, into the regency era? But....the drawings and fashion are beautiful just not entirely accurate
Rebecca Hails- ikr, lady tremaine?
thank you!
Video: were you surprised by some of the outfits
Me: yes I was surprised at how LITTLE research you did on this
Yeah i know right!
@Rameesha . k we know that, we are just bothered on how she acts like she knew everything about social history but really doesn't and literally gives stereotypical misinformation to the viewers.
Wrong about Ariel. It was Hans Christian Andersen who wrote the story of the little mermaid, and the story happened in Denmark. Why do you think that we raised a monument of her in Copenhagen, in memory of the author and the sad story of the lovesick young mermaid?
IKR i thought the same thing! like Denmark literally has her statue
AND! H. C. Andersen wrote the little mermaid in late 1800, so they should have gone for the Danish fashion in late 1800! jesus... Makes you wonder if they even did any research.
Disney can be morons sometimes
It's ALMOST like they themselves didn't bother to research while saying the animators that had to draw these characters over and over over thousands of times didn't so research. SURELY they can not be hypocrites that don't understand 2d animation at all and the work that goes into it. Why that would make them look very foolish indeed.
Exactly how is this Disney's fault? I don't believe Disney ever said it wasn't in Denmark; In fact i don't think they ever gave a location. The people on this channel made that assumption based off of lack of research and incorrect assumptions from 'context clues' they got from the show.
Totally agree with the Pocahontas one. Disney should defiantly animate it more accurately and cover Pocahontas’s top with just beads for a KIDS MOVIE
Also add the fact that she never loved her husband, that she was forced into the marriage and taken from her tribe and never got to see them again!!
My school is named after a Native American princess (Daughter of the chief) who was forced to marry a man who my little brother's middle school is name after when she was like 12.
I think they tought it would have been problematic, since the original was a child
I disagree with the Belle one. Belle was way more into her books than into her looks. What was striking about her was her *natural* beauty and lack of necessity to rely on the fashion trends of the day.
Jenee L'French Not the looks, its the books lol😂
Sounds like Hermione Granger😂
Jenee L'French lol
I just posted a comment about belle
They were talking about the dress she was given during the dance scene, not her normal wear
Yes, they are alike.
Yikes yall really need to put more research and accuracy into these videos...
Ariel is Danish, Aurora is French, Mulan did not marry into royalty, etc. etc.
You also keep forgetting that many of these princesses were poor, or away from society, therefore wouldn't be dressing in royal/wealthy fashion...
Little Tuna I thought that too. Like when they said Belle would care more about her clothes. Belle wasn't wealthy, and just going by Belle's own personality, I wouldn't see her as the fashion driven type even if she had money.
Do they not even know the actual characters in the movies? ^_- Tsk tsk people!
A few of them did turn into royalty in the end but for more than half of the movie they were basically poor.
Yes, mulan not marry into royalti. That guy isn't a Prince, so Mulan doesn't become a Princess.
The point of the vids is to bring in money.
also the original artist never placed ariel in georgia xD and Belle was poor and the time of the story is roughly estimated.
Tiana’s dress was made from god damn magic, of course its not historically accurate.
Jewel Waters Those comments about blacks and whites seemed unnecessary and slightly racist just to talk about what dress she should wear. Also who knows what a princess in 1920s New Orleans USA would have looked like.
@@latonyanewsome0 ikr. I agree with you wholeheartedly
Plus it's her wedding dress, not an everyday dress.
and also cinderella
You don't have to cuss God like that you ought to know better that is very ugly
"did u know pocahontas was real person?"
me: "i mean who didn't. u really had to ask that?"
*loses faith in humanity*
Lol
I didn't
I don't
I didn't know
Why all the dresses were over simplified in contrast with their historical counterparts?
For the same reason Mickey Mouse and his friends are drawn with 4 fingers: *It saved up a lot of time and work for the animators.*
Imagine yourself having to draw all those dresses in full detail, frame by frame, with a tight schedule back in the day. Same goes for 3D CGI graphics, helps avoid time constraints and clipping issues.
The phrase "less is more" fully applies here for that reason.
@Cupcakke Elizabitch Monhoe and neither was her brain
not just that but remaking those dresses for little kids would take a lot of time, and they would end up costing more
And to fit this,
Frozen 2 took lots of time.
How off would it look to have a dress with that much detail with all the cartoon surroundings?
Incorrect about Belle. She was the daughter of a simple inventor and her clothes would have matched that. To compare Belle's clothing to Marie Antoinette (who this video pictured) is ridiculous.
Agreed. She would have worn simple peasant clothes. The comparison is only accurate after she is with the Beast.
Not after she married the Beast. The Beast was a prince and after she became a Princess, Belle's clothes would have reflected her new status.
@@MsXizan so for like the last few minutes of the cartoon?...this video wasn't what I thought it be lol
when she goes on her date with the beast she is dressed by the wardrobe who would have dressed her as fashionably as she could
Yup, its too ridiculous. Comparing our lovely and simple Belle to the high headed and untamed queen of France. ( Sorry if I angered someone)
It makes me wonder if these people have even seen "Beauty and the Beast" if they think Belle should have been dressed like a wealthy woman. It's very clearly stated that Belle and her father were poor.
Sara Makes Art trueeeee. Not to mention the fact that her whole character is about how she’s unique and doesn’t even care how she looks.
Sara Makes Art she married a king or a prince which is ROYALTY
Crystal Angel But that wasn't 'till the very end of the movie. Throughout most of it, she was poor.
YES! Exactly what I was thinking! Also, Belle was way too busy reading actual books to be messing with fashion magazines.
Anica Kyra Fajutag she doesn't marry until the end of the movie, and the beast was cut off from society so how would he have been able to provide the top fashions? She wouldn't have had the latest fashions until they were married and he became human at least.
There are a few things in this that are missing some points.
Firstly Aroura was French and the dress she wore was made by the Fairies who were looking after her and they were living like peasants to hide her royalty for 16 years plus they decided to make the dress on her birthday so they didn't have time to make it all fancy and royalty like the Queen (her mother in the film).
Next Ariel, her wedding dress in the film does have the mutton sleeves!
Then you are comparing Tiana's swamp wedding dress to a casual dress of the 20s. The dress you should have compared is the dress she wore at the end of the film. Then again she is a princess by then.
Next, Snow White was made a slave to the Queen who didn't want to make her look any beautiful than her so she would have given her basic clothes at the time or something to make her less royal than the Queen.
With Cinderella, you should have compared Claire's image to the original design of Cinderella, not the evolved version which made every past Disney princess have so many sparkles on their dresses.
And finally with Rapunzel, again like Aroura grew up like a peasant so of course, her dress won't be as fancy as the high class or royalty she is.
I know it much but let's not forget that most of the Disney princess before 2000s were hand-drawn, imagine how hard it would be for the artists to draw frame by frame a dress with so much detail to match the era they were in, especially the classic princesses who drawn traditional, not digital.
One more note, Mulan did not become a princess in the film. She becomes a princess due to Disney adding a new requirement of performing an act of heroism.
Agree
Underrated comment
Neither Belle, Aurora or Rapunzel were supossed to resemble royalty with their outfits - with the latter 2 being lied to about their royal status. Also, Cinderella's dress was made by a friggin fairy - ofcourse it had to have glitter on it.
Jeffrey. Have you read the original Cinderella tale? Instead of a fairy godmother, Cinderella goes to a tree where her late mother is buried under. She either prays or recites a poem (there are different versions). The poem goes like this:
"Shake, shake, Hazel Tree,
Gold & Silver all over me".
A golden shower falls onto her thus creating the dress & shoes fit to wear to a Royal Ball.
luv the fairy glitters
Because that's supposed to be "Vair" and not "verre".
Rapunzel gets locked in a tower for 18 years with no contact to the outside world and most likely made the dress herself so naturally it’s obviously her fault for not knowing how to dress historically duh...
we're talking about the disney movie and character here...
Exactly! How would she be up on the latest trends?
EXACTLY THANK YOU
What? Mulan did _not_ marry into royalty!
And I hope people realize the reason Disney characters designs are so simple is because they're going to have to animate them. To traditionally and fluently animate such detailed and intricate designs frame by frame would take a toll on any animator. This is why simple designs are important for 2D animation.
Milan did marry into royalty... she married the emperor's son
Lili Hurst, In the movie, Mulan marries Shang, who is the son of a general, not an emperor.
Lili Hurst HE IS A GENERALS SON AND A GENERAL NOT ROYALTY
Lili Hurst no he was the generals son the emperor only has daughters if you rewatch the beginning of Mulan 1 and Mulan 2 you will see those things pointed out
She married a General
"The movie feels like it's entirely set in its own fantasy world"
That makes sense. Actually, I think that's the point
This is wrong this is all wrong The little mermaid took place in DENMARK Sleeping Beauty took place in FRANCE Belle cared about her BOOKS more then her LOOKS and Mulan married a GENERAL not ROYALTY
Lijah Holley wasn’t Sleeping Beauty in Germany?
Isabella A nop, Charles Perrault is the original writer of a lot of tales.
This gets me so shook
In the Chinese movie Hua Mulan, the general is a royalty, I dont want to spoil more if you are interested to see the movie.
I agree with you but sleeping beauty did not take place in France belle did because the song for the intro clearly had the word Bonjour😑
the problem with this channel is that they think they are right
Ikr
Haha lmao
you just a hater
Tishiya Taylor And You're incorrect
Sir Fluffles Meowsalot I don't care if Im incorrect I still think your a hater
The little Mermaid takes place in late 18th century Denmark though, very far from Georgia...
I wanted to write that but then I saw your comment. Suppose they've never read the story written by Hans Christian Andersen.
The little mermaid was actually a boy. It's a homosexual love story. Look it up
I've read the story written by Hans Christian Andersen a hundred times and the mermaid was definitely a girl. The story is called 'Den Lille Havfrue' which means 'A little female mermaid', and it is the story which was adapted for the Disney animation movie. The original story doesn't have a happy ending - the mermaid dies letting the prince and his princess live.
As a dane, I can tell you that the story was indeed inspired by Hans Christian Andersens story “Den lille havfrue”, but the enviroment under the sea is nothing like ours. Most fish in the film are tropical, definitely not what we have here in Denmark. You would almost assume it was placed somewhere far from Denmark. And about the homosexual theory - some believe Hans wrote it to symbol how he was in love with a man, though it has never been confirmed I believe.
Masqueraded Potterhead
Yes, that's true about the tropical fish and the sea. That's why I like our Russian cartoon "Русалочка" and also the film much more. To my mind these adaptations are truer to the original.
There is a LOT of innacuracies in this video. Many very obvious ones. Although what really put the cherry on top for me is when they used a Victorian image while describing the kind of fashion the era beauty and the best is set in would use. If real research had been done, this video wouldn't have been so abysmally misinformed to the point of making such a poor mistake. Not to mention, no offense to the artists but a lot of the 'realistic outfits' still where not realistic in the slightest. A good portion of them did not take the character's actual social ranking or personality into account either for example. Like again, Belle. She's not royalty, and not extremely well off. She's not poor nor middle class, a little bit higher I would say, but definitely not wealthy. Only the wealthy could afford the fashionable trends with powdered wigs and pastel colored gowns (wich was very popular in France mostly. Honestly the live action movie did a WAY better job at being a bit more historically accurate than this video). It's all just, horribly wrong and misinformed.
The reason all of the outfits aren’t historically accurate is one, they have to animate the scenes, and two, to make the dresses more appealing to children.
my thoughts also haha. Moreover, it's costly to animate those characters if it has complicated and detailed dresses. Those disney princesses are made for children not for adults, although, adults can still watch them.
Gwen Capener I agree
Also you know... they need to make dolls! Could you image how the manufacturers would feel making “historically accurate” doll clothing and hair?
Not to mention all those cheap dresses for kids' Halloween! Wouldn't be profitable to make detailed historically accurate dresses.
And also... they’re fairy tales. Not history books.
The little mermaid takes place in Denmark, not Georgia
Anne Lorraine yes, but nobody ever notices our country🤷🏼♀️
You're right, this video is full of mistakes...
I was looking for this comment. I went to Denmark last year beautiful country and people.
Anne Lorraine yeah
Anne Lorraine really
Did you know that talking animals is inaccurate, too?
"If this animal were to speak, it would only be historically accurate if they had a Long Island accent."
No no no
Of course they do! It's called drugs... So, that just means a lot of people talking to animals (and they talk back) is a result people running around high.
So true
It’s just not historically accurate and a bit far fetched😂😂😂
Mulan did not marry a prince so she is not royalty. She married Lee Shang a general of the army.
What about Belle leads you to believe she cared about fashion
Seriously, plus she grew up dirt poor.
In the Disney version, yes. However, in the original story, her father was a rich merchant. She had two sisters who asked for jewels and parasols and things like that, but she simply asked for a rose. Yes, she was down-to-earth and probably would not wear clothes like that until after she was married, but she wasn't completely broke.
Kristy Galbraith I thought that was part of the new Cinderella her stepsisters asked for jewels and parasols and she asked for a rose her father left became ill and died the rose was then given to Cinderella with the sad news that her father had died
In the new Cinderella, yes. But if you look up the original Beauty and the Beast, Belle has two sisters. The witch who cast the spell later turns them into statues outside the prince's castle, because of what they had done to her over the years.
Yet many people don't realise this as it was never made into a film therefore stories can get mixed up
I'm not sure why you would expect down to earth bookworm belle to follow fashion trends of england. It doesn't seems to fit with her character. She was not shallow or superficial in the slightest.
France***
Why do you think that people who love fashion are shallow?
in that time period, keeping up with fashion would have been a fulltime job... especially for Disney's version of belle, where she was poor, and then shut in with the beast. Loving fashion isnt shallow. Having your life be about it when you arent working in the fashion industry is.
*France
Being poor/lower class is the very reason why she wouldn't bother with fashion trends. Fashion trends of the time were set by the wealthy and those who wanted to appear wealthy and move into the upper class. Working class individuals did not have the time or money to spend on trends.
Princes and the Frog. Tiana DID dress according to her times in her daily clothes. Her costumes were just that - costumes. The wedding dress had also been tied into her being a frog at the time she married. She was in the middle of the bayou and the dress reflected that. I don't think nature gives a care about human fashion statements. It has it's own.
Not only that but just because her mother was an amazing seamstress doesn't mean she could afford to make the latest fashions for her. And considering she was marrying royalty, she needs something more elegant than what is essentially a cocktail/party dress
Well we know Tiana had the money for the some trendy dresses, based on the coffee can collection. But, she was also choosing to save thet for the restaurant, and lets face it, clothes are the 1st thing to get cut in a budget.
she actually didn't have much money, the ones on the ones in cans were all little pieces not worth much, so the total amount couldn't be so high even if they were so many - even if she hadn't decided to save her salary she couldn't afford anything but a fancy dress or two
Lilith Nicole which is what I said, and this would have been the 1920's, she's got at a minimum 50$ in those cans, probably more. That was a lot of money, sure it's not the stack of cash she got from catering the party, but it's not to be discounted easily.
I'm not saying she didn't have much or didn't work hard, but the money she had gained probably couldn't allow her to buy more than one or two fancy dresses even if she had decided to spend them on anything she wanted
take a shot every time they mention claire hummel
They didn’t even quote her or talk about her actual thoughts on the drawings. Smh
Claiming that their fashion is “historically inaccurate”, yet so many things in this video were inaccurate...plus fairy tales and Disney movies aren’t meant to be accurate...also, why would Belle need to worry about the fashion of wealthy people if she was poor? Her fashion would have been different...
Oh em gee people give it a rest! Like this is supposed to be a fun video to compare what it would have looked like if they were real! Like sriously not that big of a deal.
Melissa: word. And Amalia, if they are going to criticize Disney for getting it wrong, even in fun, at least they could get most of it right. Which they didn't.
Wait.. Did they honestly say the artist just threw her hands up because the images she was getting for Mulan were from China...she's Chinese!!
And she didn't marry isn't royalty, Shang was a military leader which would have made his family Nobel and high ranking but so was her family.
no , in china we didn't do that, loyal family member , you only can born with, or the girls married with a loyal man, you can't make it with, unless you successful rebel.
What?
@@steveb1164 ik it's so sad
Isn't Mulan Japanese?
Isabella Pimm
Did the ‘Great Wall of China’ give it away?
...Who expect historical accuracy in a disney animated fairy tale ? We have creatures that don't exist, but the clothing is supposed to be accurate ? You use a genie line to determine the Aladdin took place after the third century but ignore those referencing 20th century pop culture ?
ManaPeerfr right?
Yeah because I put on a Disney film for historical accuracy, not magical escapism...
And expecting Pocahontas to run around half naked would been a huge no go for a kids movie. As Jasmine clothes Disney want to show the beauty of their girls and a outfit that covers most her would not show her off as well plus the genie has been around forever and knew about Disney before the rest of the characters seem to
No one, but it’s fun to point out the inaccuracies
Thank you comment section for saving me 10 minutes of my life.
Omema Riaz ohhh I’ve been here a *LOT* longer!!!
Same, I thought I was gonna watch this, but...
Ariel in Georgia?! Dude. It's a fairytale from denmark
Dude, they are talking about the Disney version.
Disney changed almost all of the places their fairytales actually came from.
Disney actually keep where the original stories comes from :).
Lilith Nicole Lol. But they don't really. ((Minus The Princess and the Frog))
Also, the movie does take place in Denmark.
Think Ariel was in Denmark too. Second, wasn’t Eric a prince, I don’t think Georgia has princes.
It's not an "error", it's more of an "imagination".
Also let's say that, there are really SMALL differences in most of them.
Putra Archibald thank you! It kinda bugged me that they were labeled as "errors" lol
Putra Archibald thank you, some one finally gets it, it's a child movie, not a adult movie, that's why they made it cute
Yup it made me really triggered!!!
Plus they didn't have correct facts either.....
Holy whay! Ariel is based in Denmark!!! And the only reason ariel's dress had boofy shoulder pads is because the movie was made in the 1980s!!! Helloooo Lady Diana's dress????
It had nothing to do With the Edwardian era.....Which is early 20th btW.....not 1840s...ok bye
Alexfolledemoi where in Denmark are there hurricane and the other various tropical things seen in the film?
7:24
Li Shang isn't royalty. He's a general. Not in the royal family. Nobility for sure, but not royalty
Aurora was living in a cottage so she would have worn poor clothes, not expensive ones. The three fairies never told her about her royalty.
But the recent movie clearly depicts belle to be different from her peers especially in the beginning...the other women's clothing were elaborate and outrageous but she chose to be simple and modest
Absolutely. And Belle was not wealthy enough to have those elaborate clothes at any rate.
Just wanted to comment that
I think disney did this on purpos because as we all know belle would never go with the trend.
And the beast didn't even choose the outfit no she had a woredrobe where she chose her dress.
Lulu Charlene I agree. Belle was someone who stood out. And, her family was poor. And, though she was wealthy, she would be very humble and modest.
the little mermaid is from Denmark, H.C. Andersen is the original author. so you should have look at the Danish clothing from that Time
Actually Mulan did not marry into royalty. She married a general, not a prince or anyone related in the royal family.
I think thetalko is wrong about belle since belle was showing that she is imperfect and that she didnt care about how she looked. Also Rapunzel was locked away in a tower for 18 years so how could have she knew what she was supposed to wear. I don't think thetalko really knows what they are talking about because clearly they didn't even know half of the stories.
2:00 you are actually wrong, The Sleeping Beauty is a french tale, the story doesn't take place in England
P Navas most of them during the the 100 years war as they conquered most of the area
There are many different versions and origins to the story, in this one, I believe it takes place in England.
That’s what I was thinking.
Philippine Thank you
ya even cinderella was french
ariel is danish tho
Mulan married into royalty? Must’ve missed when generals where made a royal title.
DesuUsagi well be married to a general would've been like a royal but that's just my thought
IF I remember well, the general turned out to be an Emperor's relative... Can't remember if son, grandson or what else...
how does her getting married to a man devalue her or her story about gender equality??
i totally agree, and also, not nobody knows but a secondary meaning of the story is about homosexuality: the general seemed to be gay since he had fallen in love with someone who they thought was male. now, in the creator's idea he could also have fallen in love with "him" because he felt the "femininity" "he" actually somehow showed (I mean, it's impossible to TOTALLY fool someone about one's gender, some of your actual gender characteristics MUST slip out of the act) or maybe he was bisexual and not only liked men, so he was fine with Milan being a girl after all. And instead in the end he does marry a girl. Like, it seemed to be a message that homosexuality is fine and homosexuals should have the same rights and worth that straight people, along with the main women's right message, so why did they have to make him turn straight? I sincerely think they missed a good chance.
it's because at the beginning the story seemed to transmit the message that women do not only deserve equal rights to men, but that they are also worthy even if they are not married and they can do whatever they want with their lives (in China at the time this was totally absurd) and instead after all her effort to work her way up and show she was worthy by herself and she could do things that no one could think of just because she's a woman, she finally gets married to a man. why does the ending have to include her actually reaching what SOCIETY thinks is better, instead of just winning her personal war?
I like videos like this because it's fun to think about but not when NO ONE DOES THEIR RESEARCH
You keep calling the drawings, "photos." Stop. Please. Just. Stop.
Emily Thompson true but if you take a chance photo of a drawing does it not become a photo?
Angela France, you're right. Good point.
But Tina was poor so that is why she was not wearing what you described, her friend however her rich friend was wearing the right thing. For Snow White her stepmom had her working like a slave. Do you really think she would have put her step slave daughter in the latest fashion trends
Squishys, Slimes, DIYs, and more And Snow White’s stepmom didn’t like Snow White’s fairness so that would be another reason not to have her up with the latest fashion trends
What I wish they would have done in Once was make Regina snows real mother as in the original tale and have the fashion of the time
Squishys, Slimes, DIYs, and more also is Disney really going to focus on segregation in a kids movie?
I think that the outfits for the princesses were actually accurate, but were simplified. When the video shows the art comparison and movie comparison, they're quite similar. The art comparison is just more detailed than the movie comparison.
Ｗ ••Ｒｏｇｅｒ this
Mars C.S. that
Agreed
I'm not sure Rapunzel would have had a complete purple dress though since purple was pretty hard to come by for a long time. And she was not actually living like a princess for most of the movie. But other than that sure. :)
Not for jasmine
I do love the fanart depicting what their wardrobe would look as more historically accurate, it's stunning and, yes, honestly, prettier than Disneys. However, if I were, say Fairy Godmother, if I were to magically design someone's dress, I wouldn't say "what are the other girls wearing?" I'd rip something out from the future with my magic.
The Ariel one is literally EXACTLY the same.......
Aasiyah Khalil THANK YOU. Someone else noticed.
THANK YOU I was looking to see if anyone else noticed too
NO! It's...greener lol
True i noticed that too
Abby Spencer THANK YOU! SOMEONE ELSE WHO ISN'T DUMB!!!
The narration sounds so condescending haha. I didn’t watch all of it but even if Belle wasn’t poor, I don’t remember her being written as materialistic as you believe the entire female population of 17th century France was.
Also damn, imagine hand animating all those elaborate dresses
it really did! It was so frustrating hearing them put down all of Disney's designs like that. Maybe the bigger picture is more important than accuracy, ok?
Most of their Disney related videos sound like this
I’m sorry, but Genie saying “looks very third century.” Definitely does NOT give ANY hint whatsoever as to the time period. Genie literally talks about futuristic styles, technology, and people. He pretends carpet it a plane for a bit and turns into a Genie flight attendant. It’s so obvious
Yea, the so called “clues” some explanations use are ridiculous. It can’t be 3rd century with all the Mughal architecture in the film.
Chim Chim Panda I know this is unrelated but I love how no matter the topic of the video, there’s always an ARMY in the comments section
Chim Chim Panda they are that stupid to not get the joke lol
while you're right. all centuries even before islam in arabic culture,women (specially wealthy ones) wore loose modest clothing. if anything, hijab's idea is to bring about the common folk to the same equal level of royal women.
loose and modest clothing in scorching heat and sun is the most common sense outfit to wear. You need to protect ur skin and let it air out. just sayin...she's absolutely right. as for exact period. the arabic story 1001 nights came about before islam...meaning at least before the 5/6th century.
Chim Chim Panda ....on an unrelated note, I love your user name...
Lots of the Disney versions actually make more sense and represent the character bettter. For example, Belle was a commoner and doesn't seem like the type to care about fasion, so her original understated look would suit better than tons of frills.
They didn't do their research very well. So many inaccurate locations for the princesses and mulan married a general not royalty
The whole reason Belle is wearing what she wears is because she didn’t want to look like the other girls. That’s why they say she has natural beauty. And in the live action, the three girls pining after Gaston are wearing historical accurate dresses and wigs
I know. The reason for her dressing as she did was such a major part of her character. Besides, she was also on the poorer side making the comparison completely inaccurate until after she was with the Beast.
I wouldn't say that she didn't want to look like other girls, but more of she didn't care and was poor anyways.
In the 18th century, she would have been raped and been forced into prostitution if she had gone out in public dressed the way she is in the beginning of the film.
That's what you're too fucking stupid to comprehend.
Belle could afford books that makes her at least middle class and not wearing at least a corset means she was going around half naked even poor laborers had at least one work corset considering she never worked and sat around all day reading books and that she could read definitely points to her father at least providing a mid to upper class up bringing. So either they came from money but were disgraced or his inventions at least brought in some income. In the movie she sings about the poor provincial town and the simple folk there that also points to her having been upper class compared to the peasants as despite her kindness she still looks down on them for living simple lives thats a arrogance anyone who has faced actuall peasantry would not have.
I mean, I think it's super fantastic that people are inspired to draw historically accurate, alternate universe, etc. etc. versions of the princesses... but honestly, I felt that the dialogue for this video came off more pretentious than educational. I wish they'd have been a bit more forgiving regarding fantasy characters designed to appeal and be graphically memorable to the modern families in the eras in which the films were released.
Leslie Williams agreed
“She did ended up marrying into royalty, didn’t she?”
No. Obviously not.
well Tiana was poor, so she couldnt afford dresses like that. she also had to save up for "Tiana's Place" Belle, again couldnt afford, and her town didnt look like it had a store for dresses like that, so instead of thinking of the times, think about the town, if the character is rich or poor jeez
i agree they didn't have enough money
penguin lover I was thinking the same thing!
penguin lover um it's she
penguin lover I totaly agree!
penguin lover What do you mean she "can't afford" dress like that? It's suppose to be her transformed outfit after turning back into a human! Instead of a light green gown with a tiara, she wore a dark green knee-length dress with a pearl necklace and a feathery headband because magic transform her INTO that outfit in the end!!
"Rapunzel is based on a Germany children's book" but Aurora is from England and totally NOT based on a french children's book, neither Ariel based on a Denmark one.
*Complains and get picky about historical facts*
*Gets wrong facts about the original stories*
Just because the fairy tail comes from a certain region does not mean that the disneys movie take on it plays in that region. Just take the princess and the frog; It's loosely based on the fairy tail "Der Froschkönig" which is a fairy tail from germany. (as many are thanks to the brothers grimm)
But I do agree that the video is based on poor research (they get many facts wrong)
also love your profile pic, great taste :D
MayuSenpai true, but yeah i was really pissed because I lost time to see a completely horrific video xD
Thank, setagawa is such a Cutie
He isss
MayuSenpai addgjklfs im not such thing ;3;
But thank you so much, subscribed as well
aw
I see the point with Rapunzel but when you think about it, she was blocked off from society completely, so her clothes could have been any type
Glitz 'N' Glamfam
Yeah true
makes sense
Totally right. Also, why the hell should she style her hair if her stepmother comes to brush them to gain immortality kinda often? And let's say it... if she styled her hair she would waste 4 hours a day for no one to see her. How do you even make that hairstyle out of 3 kilometers of hair
Yes
It couldn't have been any type actually. While she herself may have had no idea on how to dress, simply the types of clothes available would have been affected by the trends at that time.
I swear they didn't bother to research anything before making this video, lol.
Ummmmm.... the wrong facts about Sleeping Beauty, The Little Mermaid, and Mulan are cringe worthy. If you are going to make a video about such well known topics, at least do a little research.
No offense but they don't know what they're talking about
Kaylee McIntyre who
So many mistakes
Kaylee McIntyre I know they are ridiculous
Many anglophones (read northern americans) doesn't have a clue about Europe's history facts, blurring the end of medieval era to Napoleon conquests, (or something in this range). In BatB, Gaston character proven that French Revolution already happened, because hunting was a royal privilege since french monarchy beginnings. Baroque dresses was totally outdated in this time period, "no bras" dresses was the thing in peoples in ruling charge; and Belle ballgown just anticipated "[Monarchy]Restoration" dresses.
Omg I agree so much, the little mermaid was based in denmark, mulan is not a princess she married a general and belle did not care for the major fashion trends, they don’t know any of their facts! 😂
I see Claire Hummel made this video, Ariel is from Denmark there's even a statue in Copenhagen I think, Belle was poor but the yellow dress was accurate in the film, Mulan married a General not prince, I thought Aurora was from Germany and Rapunzel was CAPTIVE how was she supposed to know anything about fashion.
i don't think she made the video but it was clearly made by someone who is a die hard fan of hers given that it's basically an ad for Hummel's work.
Lineth Gonzalez Aurora’s story takes place in England
Yes we have a statue because it was the danish writer H.C. Andersen who road the littel mermaid :-)
Rōnin Samurai it takes place in France
Martin Concannon no it doesn’t, it takes place in England
Do they forget that most of these movies were made in the 30s 40s and 50s right? Back when they had little consideration for historical accuracy
Cinderela, Snow White and Sleeping Beauty were made at the 50'... ALL the rest were made in the late 80' and 90'...
Julia Sardinha Actually Snow White came out in 1937 but yes, the rest were made later.
7:25 no she didn't, she married a General.
S-Sleeping Beauty was French....Ariel was in Denmark...and as much as I love Mulan she didn't marry royalty...this video is inaccurate
Why would she be English? Charles Perrault is french and in the animation it's said they live in a "far away land", often meaning an imaginary land anyway.
G.Marie .P right Milan marry her lieutenant or General or something like that..
Duo wroye sleeping beauty ? He is French
Sleeping Beauty is actually a french fairy tale, so the story takes place in France.
fairy tail=anime fairy tale= cartoons
Ifereimi Waqainabete yupe sorry english isn't my native language! I'll correct it!
Or in Germany. It's a German fairytale.
Juliane Pidde nope, I'm sure of it, I'm french and I learnt it in french class in 6eme (6th grade/Year 6 sorry I don't know where you're from x) ) BUT. It's inspire from the most horrible tale ever wich was italian though!
Mulan didn’t marry into royalty!!! She married a commander (I think) of the army!
You were close :) he’s a general
Rapunzel was locked up in a castle how the heck is she supposed to know what everybody else was wearing?!?! AND Ariel is a mermaid that lives underwater, every mermaid wears a shell bra in the ocean (like Ariel), and they have tails, how tf is she supposed to know how they wear outfits
SwegMintYoongi true
BTS!
It is commonly discussed among mer-philes whether mermaids would wear a seashell bra or not.
Aside from foolish human modesty, one practical argument I heard _in favor_ of a seashell bra is that they protect the nipples and breasts from getting scratched easily when harvesting from the seafloor and dragging themselves onto rough tidal rocks! (If you accidentally scratch your own nipple, then- male or female- you can sympathize with this position!)
Most ocean and salt-water-based materials would be quite abrasive to human-like skin and fish scales.
Seashells are sharp, so they dig in to the breasts and would cut into any types of tying thread or seaweed they could muster! (Actual fishing nets would be an appropriate alternate if the threads were thin enough.)
Using starfish is highly impractical, because they just crawl off, and some of them are poisonous! Oh, and since a starfish's mouth is in the center of its under-body, that means they're chomping down quite painfully on nipples! Using just
Using straight seaweed as a bodice would not work either because it breaks down easily after being harvested, and collects fine particles of sand and dust which then becomes sandpaper-ish.
Wait for a female traveler on the high seas to drown and then harvest the cloth materials? Considering merfolk easily number in the tens of thousands across the entire Northern Atlantic, those kinds of opportunities are few and far between; not practical to rely on regularly.
The modern bikini swimsuit was not invented until 1946, though there is evidence minimalist two-piece outfits go back well over a thousand years in Europe. Wikipedia suggests they may have been used for athletic purposes in Ancient Greece in 1400 B.C.E.
Most likely, real mermaids' breasts would be smaller and less dome-like compared to human females'. Or, if you want to completely remove all mammalian references, they wouldn't have breasts at all but perhaps better-developed chest muscles that lack the fat deposits. Depending on the temperature of the water where they live, overall body fat would make breasts larger/smaller by nature due to evolution.
Maybe Bell was a so called Nature's Child, those were in vogue in 17th century France, they were considered a deliberating contrast to the posy and artificially styled noble women.
EEEEEWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And at which time did you write this all things >//
Belle didnt care about beauty, and instead she cared about books. She was also living in a poor town, so she didnt have a lot of money to splurge on anyways, so
Ya wrong, son
THANK YOU
Actually when she marries into royalty in the end she DOES have money and she IS a queen, so she would dress fancily since at that time queens dressed to impress.
*YA wrong, son*
Wrigley Sings Also Thank You
Is it just me or was the entire moral of the movie to reject vanity and value inner beauty??? I doubt that after the ordeal Belle and the beast went through that they would jump straight into fashion don't you think?
Oh, and by the way - criticizing Aurora's outfit because it's wrong for a princess is a little silly when she spends most of the movie living in the forest as a PEASANT and not royalty. Her dress once she's back at the palace actually fits everything you're saying about the right dress. So maybe think a little more about what you're saying in order not to sound like you DIDN'T WATCH THE MOVIE?
Not to mention the dress was made by magical fairies which transcend time (to a certain extent)
LOL!!!!!
Well no. The dress that "isn't right" was not made by magic at all. It's an ordinary peasant skirt, chemise, and bodice. The dress made by magic is the one that fits what the video says about a correct dress.
OML CAN YOU ALL NOT HATE EVER ONE IS NOT PERFECT
Apparently not, you can't spell!
2:56 she can't dress like that if there are 5 year olds watching, she literally doesn't have a top on smh
Also:
5:45 that wouldn't be a very good example for the young viewers making them think different races should be seperated
She didn't wear a top lmao. 11 yr old girls from her tribe didn't.
Aurora is French.
Mulan did not marry into royalty, she married a general. She was already born into an upperclass family and lived during the Tang Dynasty.
For a video that's supposed to fix mistakes, you get a lot wrong.
Aileen Bordelon THANKYOU
So tru
Aileen Bordelon your correct they do!!!! I am glad some people notice
Aileen Bordelon Thank You. THEY NEED TO HERE THAT.
I thought I am the only Person Thinking that way
But like dont the villagers just keep talking about how Belle isnt like most girls so i dont think she would take the time to dress like everyone else since she mostly spends her time caring for her father and self and reading
Also, SHE WAS DAMN POOR. MOST OF DISNEY PRINCESSES WERE POOR TO START WITH, WHY AND HOW THE HELL SHOULD THEY HAVE BEEN WEARING FANCY CLOTHES?? XD
you are so right *claps*
And she was a poor villager, and most peasants in that era couldn't afford expensive clothing
Oh, I didn't know people in Cinderella's time had FRICKEN *BREAST IMPLANTS*
This video should have been titled "Claire Hummel thinks her drawings are better than Disney's"
Lmao it should've
madinno lol yea
They kinda are though.
Lmao yes
Damn straight babe!!
Tiana and her friend were raised together and babysat by Tiana mother... It wouldn't be far-fetched for them to be bffs... And considering big Daddy is whipped by his daughter, he would allow the friendshio
I'd say it's a bit hard to keep putting up your hair if it's around 20 metres long.
Alex Holmes 😂😂😂😂😂
My thoughts exactly!
About Cinderella’s dress: She has worn in the second movie a historically accurate dress (more or less). She merely chose a much lighter, simpler dress (except for those sparkles) because they are much easier to move in.
That's 10 minutes I wont get back...
Silas D It's your own fault for watching this video.
b1njjj95 More like the videos fault for not making sense and the creators not doing their research.
b1njjj95 didn’t you not also watch the vid because you were interested in how the Disney princesses really ‘would’ve looked like’?
I’m not trying to start a fight here but I think it’s unnecessary giving Silas D the fault for watching a vid
you wouldn't have got it back if you spent it doing something other then watching this... hate to disappoint
10 minute AND 14 seconds
Personally, I'm fine with Tiana's dress. Claire Hummel's dress is more accurate for a _1920s flapper,_ yes, but for most of the movie (in which she's both human _and_ in formal wear) Tiana's either in a dress she borrowed from her friend Charlotte, who is _obsessed_ with all things related to the Classic Generic European Princess, or she is marrying/has just married Prince Naveen, which would naturally call for a big, fancy "princessy" wedding dress instead, and the fashion for wedding dresses up until relatively recently tend to revolve around a handful of more-or-less timeless traditional templates rather than the cutting edge of current formal fashion.
Anastas1786 plus Naveen comes from a different place the idea of fashion is mostly definitely different for him
I agree with you! Also a lot of people don't realize that flappers were actually UNcommon, flapper fashion was a rebellion at the time, so generally only women on the cutting edge of fashion who were very interested in the looks of hollywood dressed that way. It makes sense for Charlotte since she's got a lot of money and an interest in those things, but not for Tiana. Additionally African American hair is very hard to manage at shorter lengths, so it's unlikely she would've bobbed it regardless! And, like you said, she wears very little of her own wardrobe in the movie, with her two costumes for the party, and her two work uniforms, her magical wedding dress of lilypads, and her second wedding dress from her human wedding (which is very much in the fashion)
Lol also she got the magic dress after a make out session, it isn't like she bought it.
i remember reading a short story from the time period that talked about how getting a bob was scandalous. the women that did it were treated akin to hookers. especially when you added the flapper dresses with their lack of 'proper' undergarments. and as you point out an African American woman wouldn't likely have hair that would bob anyway. without the weight of longer hair it would probably curl tight and be more of a 'fro.
Also, c'mon. Belle was poor and couldn't wear fancy clothes
True
They were talking about Belle's gown when she was at the Beast's castle, that gown was brought to her by the Beast tho.
don't they realize that belle was not like anyone and most likely did not care about how she looked or dressed, and she lived in the countryside so everyone there would have dressed MUCH more casual
and all of these would have been when the princesses actually became royalty
You do realize Mulan was a real person.....
i agree but was her real name mulan i honestly dont know
Kit Cat It was her real name. There's a poem about her and, minus the talking dragon obviously, the story is 100% real.
oh thanks :)
Walk Through The Garden wait the talking dragon isnt real? That makes me really sad
Casey Roxbee here, have a bunny instead.
{\__/}
( • . •)
o/ >❤️
ariel lives in denmark
No. The statue of The Little Mermaid is in Copenhagen, Denmark because the author, Hans Christian Andersen, comes from Denmark.
Lol no
God this video pisses me off so much, there are just so many things wrong with it.
Scramble Yes!!! I am this close [-] to seriously hurting who ever the heck made this freaking video. How can anyone be such an idiot??? None of the 'information' in this video is even remotely correct!!!!😠😠😠😠😠😠
Yah so pissed off right 😡😡😡😡
Ikr! 😡
Yeah I was pissed too, but people are sooo angry here, I can't add more... But I think the whole video is just an advertisment for the artist
Yeah, same. IDK what the context clues for Cinderella and the Little Mermaid we're, but those were both very wrong.
Actually, with the exception of Jasmin, the dresses are pretty accurate. When you are drawing the animation frame by frame you need to simplify the details, otherwise, the production can be prolonged by years!
I think the wardrobe are just simplified so the animation process won't took so long. I mean imagine if belle's gown is like that, and they still have to animate the beast and the cutleries and others, we might not even have that epic "be our guest" scene.
Telling where Sleeping Beauty lived by her name? Really? How about actually researching the origin of the tale...
Chim Chim Panda ikr and they were wrong she’s from france not from england
Their research is always the bare minimum. We can't really expect much from this channel lol
Yeah, even if you want to base it off of the idea that Roses come from a certain place I am pretty sure that the roses next to my house were brought here by a Danish great grandma. They happen to be Danish roses. Without any research I personally always saw Hubert as kind of a jovial, butch Germanic or Danish fellow while Stephen struck me as an HRE or Spanish monarch. Their drinking scene has always been a favorite; reminds me of my two best friends.
Dont be mean man!:)
Leya Al araki Ikr when she said England I was like "What no it's France!"
Sleeping Beauty is a French Story. It happened in France. If you are going to be nitt picky at least get it right. Make the whole research! Before you throw sass at me, I have a Bachelors in History and I am half way through my masters in European history during the medieval times.
U obviously didn’t go to college for spelling or grammar. 😑
stella samuelsen English is my third lenguage, right after Spanish and Italian, so I don’t expect my grammar and spelling to be 100% right.Y si quiero te lo puedo demostrar pendeja! Scommetto che non puoi capire cuesto che scrivo Americana stupida! Prima di criticare altra persona semplicemente pensa, se cuesta persona ah piu educazzine da te.
abe merino Io capisco e, un consiglio, ripassa un po’ l’ortografia italiana 😅
Stella, if you are going to attack someone for their spelling and grammar, then you should get yours right.
@@stella-zi9rk a year later still think you are stupid!!!
What I have noticed is that the outfits of the princess in the Disney movies are more simple and less decorated than what they should have worn in their time, which I think that Disney wanted to say that you should wear what you like and don't have to wear the latest fashion and copy other but it's better to be comfortable with your own clothes, that's my theory 💜
The whole Ariel thing is totally bizzare. Georgia? There isn't a monarchy. Also, her dress sleeves in the wedding dress were much more 1890s Leg-o-Mutton than 1840s. The earlier pink dress was more like the earlier period. 1840s the leg o mutton started off the shoulder, and in the 1890s encompassed it.
Also, when discussing Belle and French fashion, it flashes to pictures from the 1880s Bustle Period.
Shang wasn't a prince, he was a captain. Mulan earned the title of Disney Princess through her acts of heroism.
There's also the fact that her movie was a box office success...
Yes but then again belle was a farm girl and she wanted adventure
Exactly. Other than when she was dressed up she would have neat but simple clothing.
In the great wide somewhere
that's what I thought about along the whole video, like, some of the princesses weren't actually rich. and what about Cinderella? like, her dress was created by a fairy, it didn't HAVE to be fashionable for the time, it obviously just had to look amazing and some kind of magical. Also, I understand they are not historically accurate, but these are children movies and the characters must look cute and wonderfully beautiful, if they looked like 14th century princesses nobody would have loved them, cmon.
We don’t care if the dress is not the right style we just want the story to be good and the princess to have a prince😑