Viewing from Ireland here. I have an all wheel drive one of these in red, and I am absolutely delighted with it. Mine has the panoramic roof. I drove it around France on holiday last year and it was fantastic. I highly recommend the S-Cross. In Ireland, it's priced below comparable cars from other manufacturers.
Just bought a 2023 S-Cross Plus for $36k drive away for a Demo with 7,000km on the clock. I think I got a lot for the money - Absolutely awesome vehicle. We owned a Vitara turbo for the past 6 years that was fast, faultless and very economical on fuel, so a nobrainer to get another Suzuki with the same motor and torque converter auto and paddle shifts. 9" screen, 360degree cameras, heated seats, dual climate, and significantly more space were the big improvements for us. Great that it still has 17" tyres and in the back you can actually fit a full size spare under the floor. Like the Vitara, it was built in Hungary.
Personally, I really like this as a proposition. Suzuki may not offer the latest tech and flashy features, but the depth of engineering and fun (for me) outweighs this. Suzuki makes drivers cars that will last the test of time. I'll trade the smartphone charging pad for something that's lightweight and chuckable through corners any day :)
Personally i think the price is fair, considering the S Cross does come base with 4wd while the competition doesnt. The problem i think with Suzuki is that unless you've previously owned one then you don't really understand how good they are. Sure, the competition might look and feel nicer, but they'll fall apart well before the Suzuki.
I started doing unemotional research into a new car about 18 months ago. Reliability, fuel economy and practicality were my goals. I am not swayed by unnecessary electronics that i know may fail within years. Within a month, looking at facts and figures and keeping emotional judgement out of the equation, Suzuki rose to the top. Another reviewer said it best. Suzuki gives a lesson in what you need from a car, and the frivolous technology we can do without. Under its current management, they are making good balanced designs, and they have earned my respect, without spending a single cent on marketing on me. All of this is to say - they are very reliable.
Wow, prices in OZ are way lower than in Europe. Here the S-Cross (1.4 turbo, AWD, AT) was 29-32k euros a year ago (so, 48-53k AUD). It's a fun car to drive, and actually pretty good off-road too (though ground clearance and approach angle should be better).
Suzuki Splash was imported in limited amount to South Africa we had Kizashi replaced by Ciaz we had Altos & SX4 in South Africa SA cant receive Invicto & S-Cross .
It's a shame the UK doesn't get the torque converter auto, over here we have the 1.4 turbo mild hybrid with manual transmission or 1.5 non turbo full hybrid with an automated manual transmission!
Its sad, I dont understand the purpose of the non turbo variants. they just seem to rev higher and drink more fuel without any of the performance. turbo is the go.
the Scross is a fantastic car I wouldnt mind owning,its practical(the boot is the best for vehicles of the same size and its door bins can fit my wide bottle)great to drive and fuel effecient. however when you compare it pricewise with its rivals the only one that completly embarrases it price per spec is the Haval Jolion which isnt as practical(that boot is on par in the real world with a hatchback as its so short). suzuki Australia didnt do themselves any favors on the pricing but thats due to the 1.4L boosterjet engine being so damn expensive. they should have brought the grand vitara which is much cheaper a little less practical in the boot but very economical to run and is much cheaper than this,but I suspect thats the case because they figured that the average Aussie has 40k as loose change.
Yes, no complains so far.. It is easy to drive and offers decent comfort. Good enough saftey features including 360 degree view ,practical choice for everyday driving, but don't expect luxury amenities. I think price point is the key, question is can we get all the key features/technology available in 2024, under 40K, from a reliable brand?
It has a boring look , but you can bet it will be reliable, a haval looks much better , but this suzuki will probably outlast 2 generations of haval and byd's Suzuki should have put this powertrain in the 4 door jimny
This shows why suzuki is largely irrelevant in Australia. 40k and boring. The climate control looks like an old tape deck and interior is drab. Sure it has some good points, like the engine, but its not worth 40k.
@@daweigo6851youre wrong about that,its cheaper in its home market of Europe,plus this car is too expensive outside developed markets. i know a latin American dealer that brought in a few units to test the waters,they sold the handful they brought in but they were just too expensive for the market. they replaced the S Cross with the Jolion in their lineup and they are selling them hand over fist as they were cheaper to import and the spec for the price was more palatable to people.
Yeah.. Enjoy the 20 yr old User interface on the Nav screen, the 20% increase in fuel usage for no reason, the service "experience" with Volkswagen "technicians" and the digital dash that will kill the entire T-roc when it has a fault. It might be worth further research into reliable design and technology, if you're serious about finding the best value in a modern car.
Viewing from Ireland here. I have an all wheel drive one of these in red, and I am absolutely delighted with it. Mine has the panoramic roof. I drove it around France on holiday last year and it was fantastic. I highly recommend the S-Cross. In Ireland, it's priced below comparable cars from other manufacturers.
Just bought a 2023 S-Cross Plus for $36k drive away for a Demo with 7,000km on the clock. I think I got a lot for the money - Absolutely awesome vehicle. We owned a Vitara turbo for the past 6 years that was fast, faultless and very economical on fuel, so a nobrainer to get another Suzuki with the same motor and torque converter auto and paddle shifts. 9" screen, 360degree cameras, heated seats, dual climate, and significantly more space were the big improvements for us. Great that it still has 17" tyres and in the back you can actually fit a full size spare under the floor. Like the Vitara, it was built in Hungary.
Personally, I really like this as a proposition. Suzuki may not offer the latest tech and flashy features, but the depth of engineering and fun (for me) outweighs this. Suzuki makes drivers cars that will last the test of time. I'll trade the smartphone charging pad for something that's lightweight and chuckable through corners any day :)
Lots of useful information. Well presented. I think this is a good review.
Good review. Reliability is everything
The previous gen was about 30k drive away yet they sold bugger all now at 40k that explains why I haven't seen any summary way over priced
I’ve seen more of these then the previous gen
Personally i think the price is fair, considering the S Cross does come base with 4wd while the competition doesnt. The problem i think with Suzuki is that unless you've previously owned one then you don't really understand how good they are. Sure, the competition might look and feel nicer, but they'll fall apart well before the Suzuki.
I started doing unemotional research into a new car about 18 months ago. Reliability, fuel economy and practicality were my goals. I am not swayed by unnecessary electronics that i know may fail within years. Within a month, looking at facts and figures and keeping emotional judgement out of the equation, Suzuki rose to the top. Another reviewer said it best. Suzuki gives a lesson in what you need from a car, and the frivolous technology we can do without. Under its current management, they are making good balanced designs, and they have earned my respect, without spending a single cent on marketing on me. All of this is to say - they are very reliable.
Wow, prices in OZ are way lower than in Europe. Here the S-Cross (1.4 turbo, AWD, AT) was 29-32k euros a year ago (so, 48-53k AUD). It's a fun car to drive, and actually pretty good off-road too (though ground clearance and approach angle should be better).
just great, good engine and without the cursed cv transmission. 4wd system is great. I wonder if a lift kit can be fitted?
Suzuki Splash was imported in limited amount to South Africa we had Kizashi replaced by Ciaz we had Altos & SX4 in South Africa SA cant receive Invicto & S-Cross .
Suzuki should come up with a proper sunshade to cover the panoramic roof. Especially one that suits Australian summer !
Australia & New Zealand still have Vitara & Vitara Brezza wow is Nissan Qashqai called Dualis down under ?
We have Nissan Qashqai and Nissan Dualis
It's a shame the UK doesn't get the torque converter auto, over here we have the 1.4 turbo mild hybrid with manual transmission or 1.5 non turbo full hybrid with an automated manual transmission!
Interesting. In Serbia we get the torque converter AT (on the 1.4 turbo mild-hybrid). It's a great AT.
Its sad, I dont understand the purpose of the non turbo variants. they just seem to rev higher and drink more fuel without any of the performance. turbo is the go.
the Scross is a fantastic car I wouldnt mind owning,its practical(the boot is the best for vehicles of the same size and its door bins can fit my wide bottle)great to drive and fuel effecient. however when you compare it pricewise with its rivals the only one that completly embarrases it price per spec is the Haval Jolion which isnt as practical(that boot is on par in the real world with a hatchback as its so short). suzuki Australia didnt do themselves any favors on the pricing but thats due to the 1.4L boosterjet engine being so damn expensive. they should have brought the grand vitara which is much cheaper a little less practical in the boot but very economical to run and is much cheaper than this,but I suspect thats the case because they figured that the average Aussie has 40k as loose change.
Can this be addressed as an SUV; as it's a cross over by name itself.
dont know about this, but lt looks so plasticky cheap in the interior, the exterior is quite decent. imho, it shouldnt be starting at 40k
Bought a 2023 demo model last month for $36K + gvt charges with 3 year free servicing (2wd glx suv plus).
40k + seems bit too much
Happy with it ?
Yes, no complains so far..
It is easy to drive and offers decent comfort. Good enough saftey features including 360 degree view ,practical choice for everyday driving, but don't expect luxury amenities.
I think price point is the key, question is can we get all the key features/technology available in 2024, under 40K, from a reliable brand?
No rear vents is an automatic no for me
The interior looks like that of a car in the $23,000-$27,000 range. It’s 2024 and this is what Suzuki is offering…boring!
Whats car are even in that range now though? MGs etc? I agree 40k is wild though haha
in 2025 the LX7 should replace Ertiga the Ertiga should get discontinued in all models .
It has a boring look , but you can bet it will be reliable, a haval looks much better , but this suzuki will probably outlast 2 generations of haval and byd's
Suzuki should have put this powertrain in the 4 door jimny
This shows why suzuki is largely irrelevant in Australia. 40k and boring.
The climate control looks like an old tape deck and interior is drab. Sure it has some good points, like the engine, but its not worth 40k.
Would be half the cost in many other markets
@@daweigo6851youre wrong about that,its cheaper in its home market of Europe,plus this car is too expensive outside developed markets. i know a latin American dealer that brought in a few units to test the waters,they sold the handful they brought in but they were just too expensive for the market. they replaced the S Cross with the Jolion in their lineup and they are selling them hand over fist as they were cheaper to import and the spec for the price was more palatable to people.
Looks like rubbish value to me as well as boring and old. The T-Roc Citylife has more kit, a bigger boot and is $37,990 drive away.
Yeah.. Enjoy the 20 yr old User interface on the Nav screen, the 20% increase in fuel usage for no reason, the service "experience" with Volkswagen "technicians" and the digital dash that will kill the entire T-roc when it has a fault. It might be worth further research into reliable design and technology, if you're serious about finding the best value in a modern car.
The car aside, what a boring and dull review 😮