Happy New Year, Dennis. As an ex-Nikon shooter (D2Xs) with all the 2.8 glass who moved across to Olympus some years ago, I am pleased for you and your top-of-the-line move back to Nikon. For me, the reality is that I simply could not afford to follow in your footsteps. In fact, all my budget allows is the OM1 and, for birding, the 300/4 and 40-150/2.8 plus 1.4TC. This yields results that are good enough to make me happy in the context of my amateur photography. There would be a different justification for a professional like yourself. Your pictures are gorgeous, by the way.
Same to you and thanks! 🙂 i am also happy with the results of the OM-1 but i want to dive more in to sports photography in the future and here the OM-1 has its limits! also the DOF of Z9 and 400mm f/2.8 looks amazing
4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2
Welcome back to the Nikon world, Dennis :-) The Z9 and the top-of-line long tele-primes are fantastic and the kit you got now is a dream kit for sure! I went from (but keept) a D500/200-500mm kit through Z8/200-500mm/FTZ to now a Z8/600mm PF kit; it doesn't have the f/2.8 and f/4 you have, but in terms of weight, it is actually a bit lighter than your OM1/150-400mm, as far as I can tell (Nikon 910g+1470g=2380g; Olympus 599g+1875g=2479 -- both including batteries and tripod collars). The image quality is really good with the PF lens, better than the 200-500mm and I really enjoy the lower weight (from 200-500/FTZ to 600 PF saves 955g) and it also has a MUCH better weight distribution. So you may consider adding a Z8 as your backup some day and perhaps a 600PF for a lightweight kit or a 800PF for more reach... See you out there soon again, I guess, in the neighbourhood!
Those images are gorgeous. I've been following your channel for a while now - because I enjoy your videos and photography. I've always been a Nikon shooter and I'm glad to see their lens options have improved so dramatically. Keep shooting
I’m hoping the G9 II will have better results as new firmware is released. Congratulations on the new Nikon! If I had that sort of money lying around, the Z9 would definitely be on top of mind. Although I do hope you end up keeping the OM1. Would be nice to see it go head to head with the larger full frame
Thanks and im sure the G9II is great and will improve over time! and i will do a comparison both in situations where the both do great and also in situations where FF and f/2.8 will show its strengths 🙃
Great choice and I would have gone similar route if my back health is up for it. Beside, I am doing this just as a hobby. I do sell my works from time to time when someone wants to buy them. But I never in the market to sell any of them, it was random. Anyhow, I still do hope OMDS would update the FW to improve its AF variability as well as video AF improvement. But so far, I have more trouble deleting my images than finding the keepers :-). Anyhow, best of luck Dennis and I am for sure will continue to follow your great works! Gear is just the tool and we find what fits our needs. Cheers.
Thank you very much 😀 Im quite happy with the OM-1 for photo, there are room for improvement but i thinks its a great photo camera .. video not so much . Well im know for trying out a lot of different gear and systems 😂 but right know i think im "there" 😇
Hi Dennis, Good video Dennis. I followed you even when you were using Sony, so will still watch you even though you have ditched the OM1. If I was fit enough and rich enough 😂 to lug full frame gear around, I would probably do the same. I saw someone with a Z9 the other day and it was like a brick. Will look forward to seeing your next videos.
Thank you Roger 🙂 i properly keep both systems because i still love shooting with the OM-1 😀 but must say the 45mp FF files from Z9 are a bit easier to work with in post (cropping, noise)
You’ve settled on one of the best wildlife cameras made by the hand of man. However when I went down the FF wildlife path, I found for me at least as a simple enthusiast, that I just wasn’t motivated to get out and shoot with such a large heavy kit. I also returned the G9II after one day as well for the same reasons. I’m looking forward to following your journey further.
Did the same thing. Went from the A1 and 600 F4 to the Z9 and 400 2.8 TC. Tried the 600 TC, but there was something about that 400... Did buy the 800 pf for longer reach as well. Nice video as usual 🙂
Thanks 😁and i think i for now will just ude the 2xTC to get the 800mm reach and see how i like it and i also have the 1000mm with the OM-1 kit when the internal 1.25xTC is activated
"Grey wagtail" that bird is yellower than the sun. It's really funny thinking "how do people chose animal names !?" Congrats on your new acquisitions ! Can't wait to see what marvels you will capture :D I've been eyeballing the Z8 with the 180-600, closer to my price range (maybe even in it this year lol). The fact that precapture only works in JPEG is kind of a bummer for me. Hopefully RAW will be added in a firmware update!
Haha well its because there are also a yellow wagtail and this one has more more grey in it so i guess thats the reason 😂 (just guessing) i dont think you will regret that combo! thanks for your comment!
Lovely images. I opted for APSC as a compromise, between FF and MFT. While I am happy with my R7/RF 100-500, your images are compelling. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks 🙂 i have photographed many years with Nikon D500 and was happy with the results from that camera BUT, the FF systems today are of course much better
Having a FF and M43 setup is ideal. However, for my needs as a hobbyist, the OM-1 is plenty good enough. If I were shooting for stock then I'd favour FF for sure. I think Nikon offers the best FF system atm and it's where my money would go if I were to go back to FF.
Yes best of both worlds 🙂 and i to love shooting with the OM-1 and 150-400mm i just need the benefits of FF for what i plan to photograph and film in the future 🙂 for now i keep both systems i think
Thanks you for sharing your experience 🙂 i think OM-1 and 150-400mm is very good for photo, but in video the AF is bad for tracking birds and wildlife .. Z9 is MUCH better for that
I’ve been very tempted to switch to Nikon. Sony’s ;ack of firmware development for the A1 is a major disappointment. Nikon have been developing the Z9 to the point where it matches or exceeds the A1 and Nikon’s lens line up is way ahead of the competition. I love the built in Tics on full frame big glass. Looking forward to seeing how you get on with the new gear.
I'm split on both tbh Sony - They release the camera as indicated which functions fully. While firmware for general fixes and etc. are provided, they don't do major updates. New bodies get most of not all the technology moving forward though. Nikon - They release camera with most functions working. Need continous updates for them to reach full functionality. As a consumer, which fits your needs is really going to vary and need to do homework.
Yea i felt the same with Sony! the A1 is fantastic but they really need to up their game in after sales (updates) 🙂 Nikon has been fantastic in this regard and is actually one of the reason i went Nikon 🙂
hi Dennis A child can tell you that a full frame camera performs better than an M 4/3. It is not the Olympus lenses (OM systems) that are the problem, but the censor of the M 4/3 system. this has to do with the censor size. the larger the censor, the more light falls on it. the smaller. the censor is the less light that enters. Moreover, even in low light you can take fantastic photos with the Om-1 camera. the difference is in the man behind the camera. not into the camera. Kind regards
Glad you could clarify some camera basics 😉 i can shoot good photos with both systems but MFT has it limits and i knew this when i got into the system, but now im ready to get the benefits of FF again 🙂 Cropping, shallow DOF, Low light performance, especially when i need a high shutterspeed etc. thanks for your comment!
Thanks 🙂 I haven't had enough time with Z9 yet but A1 was superior in BIF to OM-1 for more reasons! 1: A1´s AF is blazing fast and precise and almost all the photos in a big bursts was in focus with "normal birds" by that i mean not SUPER fast and small 😀 2: With 50mp files you can crop ALOT and you dont have to photograph the birds so tight in the frame so its easier to get the AF lock and then just crop in! on MFT you need to shoot them larger in the frame to get the really detailed shoots and thats much harder. But it can be done, i made some great shoots with OM-1 og BIF. One situation i remember was Black terns! they are super fast and i have been to a location i Sweden multiple time with both A1 and OM-1 and the Terns shoot with the A1 has WAY more details in them despite shoot in the same light, distance and so on. Im not saying the OM-1 photos look bad, but they are just not A1 quality. Best regards Dennis
Great images, I also have the Z8 with the Z 600 f6.3 and the OM-1 with the 150-400, The OM-1 is very good but it cannot keep up with my Z8 but I might keep the OM-1 just to have it but maybe not. I do have an R3 that I am going to sell to purchase the Z9.
Thanks 🙂 i think im gonna keep both systems and bring the MFT set for the walk around trips at local lakes and then use the big gun for more serious stuff 🙂 aslo for macro the OM-1 i SUPER
@@DennisJacobsenWildlife Yes I will probably keep it too as I Love it but if you really think about it the OM-1 has more features then all expensive FF and truth be told the AF tracking is great too, And what I meant about it not keeping up is the ISO but then again big deal there's great software for that but it was better than the Canon R7;)
Congrats Dennis what a stunning photos and videos! Maybe off topic but I see you work on a Mackbook pro. I do a little bit of editing on an iPad but if you want to run Topaz 😮or DXO,even Lightroom Classic you need a laptop. Can you tell me which are, in your opinion,the minimum requirements like cpu/gpu,ram and ssd, 14 inch,16 inch, to run all of these programs smoothly and fast. Which specs does yours have? I know almost nothing about those things but I do not want to invest in an over spect laptop, I rather invest in photogear.. thank you Dennis and looking forward to your next video😀👍
Thanks 😀 i would go for M2 chip 16-32GB RAM and whatever size SSD you need! Mine is a 16" M1 with 64GB RAM and 4TB SSD inside but i also do 4K video editing on it
Nikon is excellent. I used multiple systems for a long time, and precisely the Nikon and OM combination. I have also used Sony and was happy with the results but dissatisfied with the usability and experience in general. For me it was never a choice about what unique equipment I should have, but rather what equipment I should use in a specific situation. My wife likes apsc, and I use FF in specific situations and MFT for fun. I love being in nature and hiking, swimming and climbing. Taking my FF equipment on these occasions didn't give me any fun. I only use FF for Wildlife in very specific situations. But I couldn't stick with just one system. I love them all and they all have their uses.
I feel exactly the same and i also think im gonna keep both systems (Z9 & OM-1) because the OM-1 with the 150-400mm is fantastic just to walk a round and have fun with and still get SUPER results :) Thanks for your comment!
Hi Dennis, you moved to OM systems from Sony because of the weight and now you moved to Nikon Z9 is much heavier system both the body and lenses compare to Sony, can you tell me what is the reason?I am using Sony a1 and for same reason I bought the OM-1 and 150-400 pro lens.For me the high mega pixel of a1 is game changer and most of the time I am using the a1 with 600mm f4 with TC 1.4.Do you think Nikon has a better AF system?
Hi Victor, well i did want something lighter at the time and more versatile and that i got in the OM-1 + 150-400mm but of cource nothing beats the FF systems out there today in speed and quality! The A1 is still the best camera i have used for bird photos but the Z9 is very close and its a better hybrid camera + it has more features than A1. Also the 400mm with build in TC made me go Nikon again because i will start shoot more sports and its a perfect lens for everything 😁 but i still think the Olympus 150-400mm f4.5 is a master piece and if the the OM-1 could perform as the A1 or Z9 it would be the perfect kit! Had hoped for a OM-1 mark II with more than a new logo and a bigger buffer 😉 but actually im working on a comparison of the Z9 vs OM-1 and the little MFT kit is performing better than expected against Z9 😂
So now, we are waiting for a comparisions of OM-1+150-400 vs your new toy ;). Maybe not to proof they are similar, but to point out how much difference there is.
haha well hmm yes i guess im know for making crazy comparisons 😂 but yes why not! maybe i will do a action photo (birds, sports) comparison and also the benefit of more MP for cropping, especially birds and small animals 🤔 but first i need more daylight and birds migrating back to Denmark
jo kan sagtens lave video med A1, næsten alle mine video´er er lavet med det kamera 🙂 det er mere 400mm med indbygget TC der fik mig til at investere i det her. Men du har ret og ja der er jo rygter om en update
Nikon 4,5kg - 21k € Oly 2,5kg - 9,5k € I think at the you will sell Nikon !!! The better image quality of FF ( visibile only in some situations , like sport in low light ) It wan
@@85mattia No doubt the OM-1 is good for photographing, but in video it lacks behind 😀 Cropping, DOF and Low light can be a challenge for MFT .. but despite i still love using the OM-1 and the 150-400mm
Even with all the hype of the Om 1 and 150-400 . A combined cost of 9,000 ...it's like expecting Bentley Quality but lacking It never had it .. unlike the Nikon double the price .That has Nissan Skyline GTR R34 Quality ... timeless classic ..
Definitely the dream of many photographers but I would feel guilty about spending more than 20.000 euros. P.S.: I don`t earn my money from taking photos either.
Nikon 4,5kg - 21k € Oly 2,5kg - 9,5k € The better image quality of FF ( visible only in some situations,like sport in low light ) it won't be enough .... OLY image quality it's more than enough, at more than half price ,and half weight ,with also the versatility of the zoom ... At the end you will sell nikon ...at the same way you sold sony FF .... IT'S A GIVEN Super FF telephotos like the 400 2,8 it's stuff for professional photographers with big economic gains who take pictures in static positions like Motorsport circuit ..... For nature photography Olympus system is significantly better
Price and weight are a choice everyone must make them self 🙂 "IT'S A GIVEN" ? bold statement from someone i dont know personally? but thanks for you comment, i think 🤔
@@85mattia me to 😁 but as you say in good conditions the MFT are gonna perform "up there" but i think i will try and do a "in good light" comparison and a "challenging light" comparison both with static and moving targets, just to see and show what to exspect from both systems
@@85mattia I will! There are some weight to it for sure but the weight are back towards the camera so the balance is good and it doesn't fell as heavy as expected
Happy New Year, Dennis. As an ex-Nikon shooter (D2Xs) with all the 2.8 glass who moved across to Olympus some years ago, I am pleased for you and your top-of-the-line move back to Nikon. For me, the reality is that I simply could not afford to follow in your footsteps. In fact, all my budget allows is the OM1 and, for birding, the 300/4 and 40-150/2.8 plus 1.4TC. This yields results that are good enough to make me happy in the context of my amateur photography. There would be a different justification for a professional like yourself.
Your pictures are gorgeous, by the way.
Same to you and thanks! 🙂 i am also happy with the results of the OM-1 but i want to dive more in to sports photography in the future and here the OM-1 has its limits! also the DOF of Z9 and 400mm f/2.8 looks amazing
Welcome back to the Nikon world, Dennis :-) The Z9 and the top-of-line long tele-primes are fantastic and the kit you got now is a dream kit for sure! I went from (but keept) a D500/200-500mm kit through Z8/200-500mm/FTZ to now a Z8/600mm PF kit; it doesn't have the f/2.8 and f/4 you have, but in terms of weight, it is actually a bit lighter than your OM1/150-400mm, as far as I can tell (Nikon 910g+1470g=2380g; Olympus 599g+1875g=2479 -- both including batteries and tripod collars). The image quality is really good with the PF lens, better than the 200-500mm and I really enjoy the lower weight (from 200-500/FTZ to 600 PF saves 955g) and it also has a MUCH better weight distribution. So you may consider adding a Z8 as your backup some day and perhaps a 600PF for a lightweight kit or a 800PF for more reach... See you out there soon again, I guess, in the neighbourhood!
Thanks Per :) its good to be back and thank you for your comment here on my channel 😁 im sure we will!
Those images are gorgeous. I've been following your channel for a while now - because I enjoy your videos and photography. I've always been a Nikon shooter and I'm glad to see their lens options have improved so dramatically. Keep shooting
Thank you 😁😁😁 same to you!
Welcome to Nikon. I am very happy with my Z8 and 800mm PF.
Thanks Ben 😁 or welcome back! i had the D500 and Sigma 500mm before i went Sony some years back!
I’m hoping the G9 II will have better results as new firmware is released. Congratulations on the new Nikon! If I had that sort of money lying around, the Z9 would definitely be on top of mind. Although I do hope you end up keeping the OM1. Would be nice to see it go head to head with the larger full frame
Thanks and im sure the G9II is great and will improve over time! and i will do a comparison both in situations where the both do great and also in situations where FF and f/2.8 will show its strengths 🙃
Great choice and I would have gone similar route if my back health is up for it. Beside, I am doing this just as a hobby. I do sell my works from time to time when someone wants to buy them. But I never in the market to sell any of them, it was random. Anyhow, I still do hope OMDS would update the FW to improve its AF variability as well as video AF improvement. But so far, I have more trouble deleting my images than finding the keepers :-). Anyhow, best of luck Dennis and I am for sure will continue to follow your great works! Gear is just the tool and we find what fits our needs. Cheers.
Thank you very much 😀 Im quite happy with the OM-1 for photo, there are room for improvement but i thinks its a great photo camera .. video not so much . Well im know for trying out a lot of different gear and systems 😂 but right know i think im "there" 😇
Hi Dennis, Good video Dennis. I followed you even when you were using Sony, so will still watch you even though you have ditched the OM1. If I was fit enough and rich enough 😂 to lug full frame gear around, I would probably do the same. I saw someone with a Z9 the other day and it was like a brick. Will look forward to seeing your next videos.
Thank you Roger 🙂 i properly keep both systems because i still love shooting with the OM-1 😀 but must say the 45mp FF files from Z9 are a bit easier to work with in post (cropping, noise)
Congratulations on the Z9! Great video and images
Thank you 👍🏻😀
You’ve settled on one of the best wildlife cameras made by the hand of man. However when I went down the FF wildlife path, I found for me at least as a simple enthusiast, that I just wasn’t motivated to get out and shoot with such a large heavy kit.
I also returned the G9II after one day as well for the same reasons. I’m looking forward to following your journey further.
Thanks for your comment 😁 yes it is quite heavy and there are always a trade off´s weight, price and so one!
@@DennisJacobsenWildlife I hope you will compare the OM-1II with the Nikon set and also its price and weight and portability please.
Did the same thing. Went from the A1 and 600 F4 to the Z9 and 400 2.8 TC. Tried the 600 TC, but there was something about that 400... Did buy the 800 pf for longer reach as well. Nice video as usual 🙂
Thanks 😁and i think i for now will just ude the 2xTC to get the 800mm reach and see how i like it and i also have the 1000mm with the OM-1 kit when the internal 1.25xTC is activated
"Grey wagtail" that bird is yellower than the sun. It's really funny thinking "how do people chose animal names !?"
Congrats on your new acquisitions ! Can't wait to see what marvels you will capture :D
I've been eyeballing the Z8 with the 180-600, closer to my price range (maybe even in it this year lol). The fact that precapture only works in JPEG is kind of a bummer for me. Hopefully RAW will be added in a firmware update!
Haha well its because there are also a yellow wagtail and this one has more more grey in it so i guess thats the reason 😂 (just guessing) i dont think you will regret that combo! thanks for your comment!
@@DennisJacobsenWildlife That makes sense :)
Thank you for your answer !
Lovely images. I opted for APSC as a compromise, between FF and MFT. While I am happy with my R7/RF 100-500, your images are compelling. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks 🙂 i have photographed many years with Nikon D500 and was happy with the results from that camera BUT, the FF systems today are of course much better
Having a FF and M43 setup is ideal. However, for my needs as a hobbyist, the OM-1 is plenty good enough. If I were shooting for stock then I'd favour FF for sure. I think Nikon offers the best FF system atm and it's where my money would go if I were to go back to FF.
Yes best of both worlds 🙂 and i to love shooting with the OM-1 and 150-400mm i just need the benefits of FF for what i plan to photograph and film in the future 🙂 for now i keep both systems i think
我之前使用OM-1+150-400 TC1.25，它長焦段錄影的對焦與追焦完全不行，後來我轉換到NIKON Z8+863，真的超級無敵滿意啊!與大家分享囉!
Thanks you for sharing your experience 🙂 i think OM-1 and 150-400mm is very good for photo, but in video the AF is bad for tracking birds and wildlife .. Z9 is MUCH better for that
I’ve been very tempted to switch to Nikon. Sony’s ;ack of firmware development for the A1 is a major disappointment. Nikon have been developing the Z9 to the point where it matches or exceeds the A1 and Nikon’s lens line up is way ahead of the competition. I love the built in Tics on full frame big glass. Looking forward to seeing how you get on with the new gear.
I'm split on both tbh
Sony - They release the camera as indicated which functions fully. While firmware for general fixes and etc. are provided, they don't do major updates. New bodies get most of not all the technology moving forward though.
Nikon - They release camera with most functions working. Need continous updates for them to reach full functionality.
As a consumer, which fits your needs is really going to vary and need to do homework.
Yea i felt the same with Sony! the A1 is fantastic but they really need to up their game in after sales (updates) 🙂 Nikon has been fantastic in this regard and is actually one of the reason i went Nikon 🙂
hi Dennis
A child can tell you that a full frame camera performs better than an M 4/3. It is not the Olympus lenses (OM systems) that are the problem, but the censor of the M 4/3 system. this has to do with the censor size. the larger the censor, the more light falls on it. the smaller. the censor is the less light that enters. Moreover, even in low light you can take fantastic photos with the Om-1 camera. the difference is in the man behind the camera. not into the camera.
Kind regards
Glad you could clarify some camera basics 😉 i can shoot good photos with both systems but MFT has it limits and i knew this when i got into the system, but now im ready to get the benefits of FF again 🙂 Cropping, shallow DOF, Low light performance, especially when i need a high shutterspeed etc. thanks for your comment!
Hi always watch your channel, I shoot OM1 + G9M2. My question is, how much better is the Z9/A1 for AF BIF?
Thanks 🙂 I haven't had enough time with Z9 yet but A1 was superior in BIF to OM-1 for more reasons! 1: A1´s AF is blazing fast and precise and almost all the photos in a big bursts was in focus with "normal birds" by that i mean not SUPER fast and small 😀 2: With 50mp files you can crop ALOT and you dont have to photograph the birds so tight in the frame so its easier to get the AF lock and then just crop in! on MFT you need to shoot them larger in the frame to get the really detailed shoots and thats much harder. But it can be done, i made some great shoots with OM-1 og BIF. One situation i remember was Black terns! they are super fast and i have been to a location i Sweden multiple time with both A1 and OM-1 and the Terns shoot with the A1 has WAY more details in them despite shoot in the same light, distance and so on. Im not saying the OM-1 photos look bad, but they are just not A1 quality.
Best regards
Dennis
Great images, I also have the Z8 with the Z 600 f6.3 and the OM-1 with the 150-400, The OM-1 is very good but it cannot keep up with my Z8 but I might keep the OM-1 just to have it but maybe not. I do have an R3 that I am going to sell to purchase the Z9.
Thanks 🙂 i think im gonna keep both systems and bring the MFT set for the walk around trips at local lakes and then use the big gun for more serious stuff 🙂 aslo for macro the OM-1 i SUPER
@@DennisJacobsenWildlife Yes I will probably keep it too as I Love it but if you really think about it the OM-1 has more features then all expensive FF and truth be told the AF tracking is great too, And what I meant about it not keeping up is the ISO but then again big deal there's great software for that but it was better than the Canon R7;)
Congrats Dennis what a stunning photos and videos! Maybe off topic but I see you work on a Mackbook pro. I do a little bit of editing on an iPad but if you want to run Topaz 😮or DXO,even Lightroom Classic you need a laptop. Can you tell me which are, in your opinion,the minimum requirements like cpu/gpu,ram and ssd, 14 inch,16 inch, to run all of these programs smoothly and fast. Which specs does yours have? I know almost nothing about those things but I do not want to invest in an over spect laptop, I rather invest in photogear.. thank you Dennis and looking forward to your next video😀👍
Thanks 😀 i would go for M2 chip 16-32GB RAM and whatever size SSD you need! Mine is a 16" M1 with 64GB RAM and 4TB SSD inside but i also do 4K video editing on it
@@DennisJacobsenWildlife Thank you so much!
Nikon is excellent. I used multiple systems for a long time, and precisely the Nikon and OM combination. I have also used Sony and was happy with the results but dissatisfied with the usability and experience in general. For me it was never a choice about what unique equipment I should have, but rather what equipment I should use in a specific situation. My wife likes apsc, and I use FF in specific situations and MFT for fun. I love being in nature and hiking, swimming and climbing. Taking my FF equipment on these occasions didn't give me any fun. I only use FF for Wildlife in very specific situations. But I couldn't stick with just one system. I love them all and they all have their uses.
I feel exactly the same and i also think im gonna keep both systems (Z9 & OM-1) because the OM-1 with the 150-400mm is fantastic just to walk a round and have fun with and still get SUPER results :) Thanks for your comment!
Congrats!!
😀 thanks
Hi Dennis, you moved to OM systems from Sony because of the weight and now you moved to Nikon Z9 is much heavier system both the body and lenses compare to Sony, can you tell me what is the reason?I am using Sony a1 and for same reason I bought the OM-1 and 150-400 pro lens.For me the high mega pixel of a1 is game changer and most of the time I am using the a1 with 600mm f4 with TC 1.4.Do you think Nikon has a better AF system?
Hi Victor, well i did want something lighter at the time and more versatile and that i got in the OM-1 + 150-400mm but of cource nothing beats the FF systems out there today in speed and quality! The A1 is still the best camera i have used for bird photos but the Z9 is very close and its a better hybrid camera + it has more features than A1. Also the 400mm with build in TC made me go Nikon again because i will start shoot more sports and its a perfect lens for everything 😁 but i still think the Olympus 150-400mm f4.5 is a master piece and if the the OM-1 could perform as the A1 or Z9 it would be the perfect kit! Had hoped for a OM-1 mark II with more than a new logo and a bigger buffer 😉 but actually im working on a comparison of the Z9 vs OM-1 and the little MFT kit is performing better than expected against Z9 😂
Tillykke med det nye grej. Det koster jo det samme som en bil ? - men hvis du går pro, så skal udstyret osse være derefter. God 2024. Carsten
Ja det er SUPER dyrt og tak 😁 og i lige måde herfra Carsten!
So now, we are waiting for a comparisions of OM-1+150-400 vs your new toy ;). Maybe not to proof they are similar, but to point out how much difference there is.
haha well hmm yes i guess im know for making crazy comparisons 😂 but yes why not! maybe i will do a action photo (birds, sports) comparison and also the benefit of more MP for cropping, especially birds and small animals 🤔 but first i need more daylight and birds migrating back to Denmark
@@DennisJacobsenWildlife Exactly! Waiting for spring ;)
Og dette kan du ikke med Sony A1 (der kommer også en firmware update)?
jo kan sagtens lave video med A1, næsten alle mine video´er er lavet med det kamera 🙂 det er mere 400mm med indbygget TC der fik mig til at investere i det her. Men du har ret og ja der er jo rygter om en update
Nikon 4,5kg - 21k €
Oly 2,5kg - 9,5k €
I think at the you will sell Nikon !!!
The better image quality of FF ( visibile only in some situations , like sport in low light ) It wan
@@85mattia No doubt the OM-1 is good for photographing, but in video it lacks behind 😀 Cropping, DOF and Low light can be a challenge for MFT .. but despite i still love using the OM-1 and the 150-400mm
Even with all the hype of the Om 1 and 150-400 . A combined cost of 9,000 ...it's like expecting Bentley Quality but lacking
It never had it .. unlike the Nikon double the price .That has Nissan Skyline GTR R34 Quality ... timeless classic ..
Thank for your comment 😁
Definitely the dream of many photographers but I would feel guilty about spending more than 20.000 euros. P.S.: I don`t earn my money from taking photos either.
😆 yes its not cheap this kit
no te sentias a gusto con el equipo sony o prefieres en estos momentos el equipo nikon.
I sold the Sony because i wanted to try out OM system first and then figure out what i wanted for the future and the choice was Nikon Z9 😁
G9ii is so disappointing...
On the Olympus 150-400mm i dont think it was a good performance but on Panasonic lenses im sure its a great camera 🙂
@@DennisJacobsenWildlife the best wildlife lenses are all Olympus. The 100-400 Panasonic sucks 😂
Reason i got MFT was the Olympus 150-400mm so i agree@@HokKan 😁
Interesting - looking forward to see some good sports photography in addition to your wildlife photos 😁
@@FBJSWF i hope so and thanks 😁
Nikon 4,5kg - 21k €
Oly 2,5kg - 9,5k €
The better image quality of FF ( visible only in some situations,like sport in low light ) it won't be enough ....
OLY image quality it's more than enough, at more than half price ,and half weight ,with also the versatility of the zoom ...
At the end you will sell nikon ...at the same way you sold sony FF ....
IT'S A GIVEN
Super FF telephotos like the 400 2,8 it's stuff for professional photographers with big economic gains who take pictures in static positions like Motorsport circuit .....
For nature photography Olympus system is significantly better
Price and weight are a choice everyone must make them self 🙂 "IT'S A GIVEN" ? bold statement from someone i dont know personally? but thanks for you comment, i think 🤔
Anyway ,well done ,and congratulations for your Nikon 400 😊
I'm very excited to see a comparison ...
@@85mattia me to 😁 but as you say in good conditions the MFT are gonna perform "up there" but i think i will try and do a "in good light" comparison and a "challenging light" comparison both with static and moving targets, just to see and show what to exspect from both systems
Please,also put on the scale the Nikon 400 ( with Lens Hood ) ,i'm very curious to know the real weight in use ...🙂
@@85mattia I will! There are some weight to it for sure but the weight are back towards the camera so the balance is good and it doesn't fell as heavy as expected