ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

2024 Ford F-150 2.7L V6 vs 2024 Chevy Silverado TurboMax: Which Engine Is Best?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
  • Today I compare a 2024 Ford F-150 2.7L V6 to a 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 2.7L Turbo!
    Ask For Jayden: www.lhmford.com/
    Ask For Jeffrey: www.seinerchev...
    Learn How To Save Time And Money The Next Time You Buy A Car: benjaminhardy....
    Second Channel: / @thebenhardyshow
    Instagram: ben_hardypl
    Facebook: @benhardycar

ความคิดเห็น • 155

  • @jeremykirk1334
    @jeremykirk1334 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I have a 2016 2.7 v6 with 186,470 miles and nothing but brakes and oil changes pull a 23 ft trailer every summer love it

    • @MrGunner945
      @MrGunner945 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve been interested in the ford 2.7. What mileage do you get, for every day driving?

  • @jakes5530
    @jakes5530 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    No competition, the 2.7 EB wins all day. Reliable, economical, and an absolute rocketship (0-60 under 6 seconds)

  • @freedomisntfree_44
    @freedomisntfree_44 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Hands down the ford. That 2.7 ecoboost has been reliable and always surprising. I can deal with a 4 banger in a midsizer but not a full-size truck

    • @davidporter7051
      @davidporter7051 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      dumb comment

    • @karlschauff7989
      @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The 2.7 EB is reliable but Ford ruined it a couple years ago with oil pump belts and EGR coolers that fail.

    • @joshtaylor1416
      @joshtaylor1416 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ecocrap

    • @joshuaatkinson5810
      @joshuaatkinson5810 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ⁠@@karlschauff7989that happened in 2017. Still no failures related to the changes. This is internet fodder.

    • @markcasler2671
      @markcasler2671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ford f150's don't hold up in car accidents
      I know from experience

  • @stevebeard7667
    @stevebeard7667 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Can't comment on the Chevy. I haven't driven one. I'm sure it's a fine truck, but I do own a 2022 F-150 with a 2.7, and I really like it.

  • @Humblescape
    @Humblescape 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I own a 21 2.7L stx. I commute 60 miles each day city/highway. I’m averaging 23.2 mpg on 87 gas. Worth it all day.

  • @alldecentnamestaken
    @alldecentnamestaken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    2.7 Ford all the way. Built like a tank (so is the Chevy tbh) but no weird cylinder deactivation tech. It's been an extremely reliable engine since its introduction.

    • @davidporter7051
      @davidporter7051 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's been cheapened out just like everything else Ford

    • @joshuaatkinson5810
      @joshuaatkinson5810 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@davidporter7051in what way??? The engine has been unchanged since 2017. Typical internet fodder.

    • @markcasler2671
      @markcasler2671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ford f150's are not built like a tank
      I had one and got into a car accident
      Not a good outcome

    • @davidporter7051
      @davidporter7051 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@joshuaatkinson5810 tell me you know little without telling me you know little. It changed in 2018. Ford started using subpar oil pump drive tensioner. Recall. Faulty intake valves. Redesigned. Where have you been? Ford is the warranty repair and recall leader for 4 consecutive years.

  • @Bradimus1
    @Bradimus1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I've owned the first gen 2.7 Ecoboost. It was a great little engine.

  • @khakiswag
    @khakiswag 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The 2.7 in the Ford for a win. It’s been a surprisingly reliable engine. Also the cadence of the turn signal in the Chevy would irritate me.

  • @SkylarRace
    @SkylarRace หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Im on my 2nd F150 with 2.7 EB 2019 and now a 2024 both have been bulletproof. I can’t recommend the 2.7 enough the 24 is much more refined, it shifts much better, the tuning and drive modes are vastly improved, and they improved the exhaust note a bit on the new model. I always tell people that if you drive one without knowing what engine it is you would never guess the displacement because it’s so quick and pulls like a freight train.

  • @tedbear6012
    @tedbear6012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Not even a comparison. The new stx is like a 22 xlt

  • @JM-fk5hh
    @JM-fk5hh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have a 2020 F150 with the 2.7, 38,000 miles, no problems, great engine, serves its purpose for my needs.

  • @markmauro3731
    @markmauro3731 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Should be noted that the chevy in this configuration only has a 1 speed transfer case so no 4 low.

  • @anthonys7534
    @anthonys7534 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Ford 2.7!! Amazing power, reliability, and fuel mileage

    • @markcasler2671
      @markcasler2671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ford's don't hold up in accidents
      I know from experience

    • @johnbianchini1803
      @johnbianchini1803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Safest full size truck. They are built to sacrifice to protect occupants zone.

    • @markcasler2671
      @markcasler2671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I owned a f150 and got Into a car accident back in January and in my opinion and experience it didn't hold up well at all
      The cab and frame buckled into my leg and foot causing major damage

    • @sprint2648
      @sprint2648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@markcasler2671your alive!

    • @garys2157
      @garys2157 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markcasler2671 It's one of the safest vehicles on the road. Were the crash bars modified?

  • @robertb.4202
    @robertb.4202 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The 2.7 Ecoboost isn't a bad motor. I'd rather that than a turbo 4 in a full sized pickup.

  • @YiddishChannel
    @YiddishChannel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Me and the Yakov Noam team wish you lots of success. Great content!

  • @glenarseneau1231
    @glenarseneau1231 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The Chevy on the outside is a much nicer looking truck but the interior of the ford is much nicer, for me I like the Chevy better

  • @marcg.3830
    @marcg.3830 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    It’s a joke Chevy does not give the two base models an updated interior.

    • @karlschauff7989
      @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're fleet trim trucks. 99% of truck buyers wouldn't even consider a WT or 'Custom' trim. LT is the "base" trim level.

    • @marcg.3830
      @marcg.3830 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@karlschauff7989 who cares if they’re base trim, if you spend that kind of money on a truck I want the updated interior. Ford updates the entire line, not just for the “99%” !!! And a base trim truck is now $40,000, hardly cheap. It truly is comical to watch Chevy people defend this, as a Ford owner, if this was Ford doing this, I would be saying the same thing. I wouldn’t be defending it.

    • @marcg.3830
      @marcg.3830 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@karlschauff7989 And as for people not selecting that trim, the dealership literally has one on the lot, hence how he tested it, so obviously they think someone will buy it!

    • @karlschauff7989
      @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marcg.3830 The kind of guy that whines about "spending that kind of money" while looking at a fleet trim truck probably shouldn't be buying a new truck in the first place. The Custom trim is an extension of the WT trim. The dealer has it on the lot for the same reason I'm willing to bet they have a Ford XL trim on the lot. And I bet you defend all kinds of cheap things Ford does lately, like routing oil pump belts behind timing chains in the 2.7 EB and 5.0 Coyote. Or Ford using those garbage plastic oil pans. Or the warped dashes on 2015-18 F-150's because of the garbage plastic Ford was using. Or Ford using failure-prone EGR coolers on the 2.7 EB when they don't use one on the 3.5EB. Or Ford using plastic on their engine exhaust heat exchanger (w/ Powerboost engine option) so that it warps and creates a big coolant leak.
      Ironic that you whine about truck prices, and then simultaneously criticize GM for not putting a more expensive interior in the fleet trims, which is exactly the kind of thing that has driven truck prices up.

    • @marcg.3830
      @marcg.3830 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karlschauff7989 wow, you really got your feelings hurt on this one! Believe me dude GM doesn’t care about you. No, I don’t defend anything Ford has done with cost cutting, but obviously you do with GM. Did you give GM a pass on the DOD issues that plagued their engines, how bout the lifter issues on the current ones, how bout the class action lawsuits over the 8 speed transmission?! And saying someone shouldn’t be buying a new truck if they complain about the prices, is exactly what all these manufacturers want, useful idiots such as yourself.

  • @user-tw8ov
    @user-tw8ov 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The Ford also has compacted graphite iron block way better than aluminum and no cylinder deactivation

    • @karlschauff7989
      @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ford ruined that by adding an oil pump belt that they routed behind the timing chains, and that EGR cooler. It's bad enough having EGR coolers on diesel engines. Now Ford decided to put that engine destroyer on a gas engine.

    • @user-tw8ov
      @user-tw8ov 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@karlschauff7989 when did they put the oil pump belt behind the timing chain when did they add the egr cooler

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@karlschauff7989 GM uses an egr cooler on their 2.7 as well

    • @sharkskin3448
      @sharkskin3448 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Doesn't the Chevy 2.7 L3B also have c.g.i. block?

    • @joshuaatkinson5810
      @joshuaatkinson5810 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karlschauff7989 I said this on your other post…. You are spreading bullshit. Those changes happened in 2017 and the engine has proved to be damn near flawless.
      All the reliability turds keep running their mouth. Toyota runs belts on all their supposed bulletproof engines minus the 5.7.

  • @ram89572
    @ram89572 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    $52k for work truck models is ridiculous and dealers should be ashamed of themselves

    • @bradboyd883
      @bradboyd883 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I agree that the prices are obscene, but that’s the manufacturer’s fault not the dealer’s…

    • @ram89572
      @ram89572 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@bradboyd883 The manufacturers certainly play a part. Don't you dare try to bs me though. Dealers have been scumming their way through the industry for years. And in particular the last few years they were adding insane DEALER markups to vehicles. What about all the times the dealer adds in that charge for various crap you don't want, don't need, and they refuse to remove. What about that precious nitrogen in your tires. How about how these scummy bastards won't just price a product at a set rate for a new item. That item has a cost associated with it. That price should reflect that cost with a small margin for profit and nothing more. There should be no negotiation required to buy a brand new product. Used, sure. New, no. Dealers are scum and how dare you have the balls to come in here and try to claim these price tags are just the fault of the manufacturer.

    • @bradboyd883
      @bradboyd883 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ram89572 since you want to be an ass hat and say “Don’t you dare try to bs me…” Show me where the dealer sets the MSRP that you complained about… Not any of the worthless extras the dealers try to sucker you into paying for… I’ll wait.

  • @PKDesigns2011
    @PKDesigns2011 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like the 2.7
    lol j/k had that 2.7 in my F150 and loved it. no issues or complaints with motor.

  • @msalazar89
    @msalazar89 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2.7 with the iron block. Love mine!

  • @Tammacazi10
    @Tammacazi10 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I've had 3 different f150s with the 2.7 ecoboost. Probably my favorite engine in any current truck after having one for some time. Great fuel economy and great pull for such a small engine. The 4 cylinder in the Chevy just does not pull as well

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      2.7 GM turbomax = 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm's. Ford 2.7 ecoboost = 410 ft-lb torque @ 4250 rpm's. So higher torque @ lower rpm is worse? Doesn't compute.

    • @Tammacazi10
      @Tammacazi10 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ews360 2,750 RPM for 400 lb-ft peak in the 2.7 ecoboost. You are confusing the torque specs with the 5.0 v8. It does compute

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The data I intially found was incorrect. This info was found on the Ford 2024 F-150 webpage states: 2.7 ecoboost = 2015-2016 375 ft-lb @ 3,000 rpm. 2018-2020 400 ft-lb @ 2,750 rpm. 2021+ 400 lb-ft @ 3,000 rpm. So, both GM & Ford make their max torque @ same 3,000 rpm. GM makes 30 ft-lb more torque than Ford. Torque, not horse is needed in towing. So, why does the Chevy (or GMC) "just does not pull as well" w/ 30 more ft-lb of torque? That does not compute.

  • @ramfan5149
    @ramfan5149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Chevy exhaust sounds like an old VW Beetle.

    • @Billybob50119
      @Billybob50119 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The ford sounds like a mosquito

  • @coolazguy15
    @coolazguy15 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also Ford has that center consol that hits my knee. I love my Chevy 2.7L with the bench seat.

    • @ericj810
      @ericj810 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I've seen 4 chevy 2.7s over 150k miles no issues. Tow up to 8000lbs enclosed trailers with ease. Its been reliable.

  • @jasonbrushett2005
    @jasonbrushett2005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    She's a beauty ! I love the Carbonized grey and the pro power onboard is incredible. Love my Ecoboost engines,I'm in Middle Sackville, keep the Ford truck videos coming!!

  • @sutnac213
    @sutnac213 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I've owned an F150 lariat, Dodge SLT Hemi, and currently I own two Chevy's . The Chevy's are 1988 k1500 Silverado Regular cab and a 2014 Ltz crew cab 4*4. Ive always been partial to how Chevy's look on the outside and they are a much easier vehicle to fix yourself than a Ford. I liked the Dodge's driving characteristics the best. The throttle response was great but the interior and exterior fit and finish wasn't great. I will surprise a lot of whoever reads this by saying the F150 I drove had the 3v Triton motor that I was able to squeeze 368,000 miles on the original engine and transmission. I wanted to drive it until it blew up but I couldn't bring myself to drive it everyday as at the time I had just bought the 2014 Silverado so, 6 months of it being parked sitting idle did the trick for me. I am now looking to ditch the Chevy and go back to the Ford just because Chevy has lost a step with the engine performance, reliability, customer service, and build quality over Ford. My wife drives a 2023 Xt4 Cadillac and after about a year owning that car I can say it feels like a glorified Nissan Versa which we owned ten years ago. I had to do a lot of "adjustments" to the Chevy just to get it to feel like I'm driving a truck with a V8 and not some four cylinder out of a PT cruiser. I'll leave on that note.

  • @websterslaughter5948
    @websterslaughter5948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'm a Chevy guy but this is pathetic to say the least. The Chevy interior is from 2014 atleast. This is embarrassing for the Chevy. 😥

    • @BamaTidefan1967
      @BamaTidefan1967 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 5.3 and the 6.2 are also circa 2014.

  • @Alabamaian
    @Alabamaian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Ben I love watching your vids!!

    • @Alabamaian
      @Alabamaian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ty

  • @Whatisthis195
    @Whatisthis195 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The custom is gross. The fact they cost the same, why would you even get that at this point

  • @TeeAZ492
    @TeeAZ492 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    2023 2.7l here and the fucker rips. I love this engine! The dieseliest of the eco boosts

  • @woofman4796
    @woofman4796 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I got a 2016 Silverado z71 off road, 5.3 v8 brand new in Oct 2016, 65 grand, had transmission issues with it practically from day 1, had it serviced several times, rebuilt twice under warranty, just after the warranty expired it started shaking so bad that I almost lost control, I traded it in June 2022 for a 2wd colorado, v6, tow package. No cylinder deactivation bullshit, no start stop,almost 2 years later, not 1 single issue

    • @ramfan5149
      @ramfan5149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Surprised you stayed with Chevy after that experience.

    • @woofman4796
      @woofman4796 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ramfan5149 I had 2 ford's before that, an iron man explorer and then an f 150, I encountered other people who had issues with the same year as my Silverado, my wife wanted dodge, I'm not a fan, so I took a chance with the colorado, we both like it a lot

  • @briankeithwood
    @briankeithwood 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the looks, sound and performance in the ford better. Also, were both 4wd?

    • @steven5096
      @steven5096 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The chevy looks 2wd no 4x4 sticker

  • @ramfan5149
    @ramfan5149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why bother testing fuel economy if you are literally just driving around the block?

  • @LarryMehrle
    @LarryMehrle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would like to see comparisons of the two 2.7 with there v8 options fuel economy and power comparisons

  • @gilbertferguson1685
    @gilbertferguson1685 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2.7 EB all day. Have it in my Bronco and love it. No replacement for displacement. Nice video. 😎

    • @davidbarclay4968
      @davidbarclay4968 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They both have the same displacement. 😂😂😂

    • @user-qp6nt4pf9k
      @user-qp6nt4pf9k 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Uh huh😂🤦🏻‍♂️ I have the 2.7 Chevy, I’ll take that any day over a ford. I’ve had nothing but issues with every ford in my company. Would never buy one personally

  • @ericj810
    @ericj810 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The chevy. 206k miles. Tows 7500lbs like a breeze on 6 to 10% grades. No issues anywhere just change oil.

  • @ELENTE_
    @ELENTE_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should test it in eco mode.. for even more fuel efficiency

  • @thomasdarwin6174
    @thomasdarwin6174 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I see new Chevys in my neighborhood but I think they are all V-8. Just not sure if anyone is getting the 2.7 Turbomax

  • @PerriStrong-ne2zi
    @PerriStrong-ne2zi หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dual turbos on Ford. Engine is also built better if you do your research on how it is designed. 10 speed tranny. I choose the F150.

  • @aesho46
    @aesho46 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Only a liberal would take a 4cyl in a full size pickup truck! 🤣

  • @_Marc_D
    @_Marc_D 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No contest on the interiors! The Chevy's interior looks 10 years old. Love Ford's digital instrument cluster.

  • @joshuahedrick
    @joshuahedrick 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't like the look of the Silverado or the F-150. I bought a 2023 GMC Sierra 1500 Elevation 2.7 Turbo. So the exterior of the Sierra blows the Chevy and the Ford out of the water. I got a loaner vehicle with about 3,000 miles on in for 18,000 off sticker so basically a 60k truck for 42k. Has the 22+ GM Premium interior so makes the comparison to the Ford a little closer. Still think the Ford a hair nicer but the GMC also nice. The 2.7 Ecoboost must be hella nice because driving a 2.7 and a 5.3 GMC back to back I preferred the 4 cylinder 2.7. If your going V8 you have to get the 6.2, which I didn't want to pay for nor is it even offered on the Elevation trim anyways. In conclusion, Ford IMO makes a better base level truck and a better King of the Road Truck (Raptor R) but in between I prefer the Chevy/GMC even though on a luxury level the Platinum is beating a High Country. The GM's just look better at the end of the day.

  • @TH-bk5hj
    @TH-bk5hj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3.5 TT Ecoboost has been a reliable engine for me. However i think Ram finally figured it out and got rid of the outdated and underpowered 5.7L hemi. The Hurricane may be smoother with the inline 6.

  • @dan43213
    @dan43213 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Keep in mind too, Chevy 2.7 will always have that crappy 8 speed trans Ford uses the 10 speed

  • @Rick-vg2pz
    @Rick-vg2pz 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    2.7 turbo max!

  • @chop2093
    @chop2093 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What’s the point of even comparing fuel economy on a trip around the block …???
    Needs to be at least a 30+ mile drive in each to get a somewhat accurate idea of fuel economy.

  • @jasonbrushett2005
    @jasonbrushett2005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pick your poison....myself I've driven and owned a 2.7 Ecoboost, excellent all around engine.Im sure the Chevy is decent too

  • @LukeO-1234
    @LukeO-1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The tale of 2.7's!

  • @almayberry538
    @almayberry538 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Small motors and BIG prices. No thanks.

  • @raydenisgarcia8737
    @raydenisgarcia8737 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ford interior is years ahead of Chevy. Exterior is nicer too. Overall ford is way better .

  • @randytroy9727
    @randytroy9727 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Now who buys a CHEVROLET and it a 4CYLINDER huh?

    • @timsouttahere
      @timsouttahere 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      fleet maybe?

    • @karlschauff7989
      @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The same people that buy an F-150 with the naturally aspirated 3.3 V6. That's what the GM 2.7L is meant to compete against.

    • @BamaTidefan1967
      @BamaTidefan1967 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karlschauff7989 The 3.3 is discontinued! The 2.7 is the base engine. What are you a GM salesman or something?

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karlschauff7989GM 2.7 turbomax (w/ 5 yr 100,000 mile warranty) makes 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Ford 2.7 ecoboost 325 horse / 410 ft-lb torque @ 4250 rpm. The Ford 3.3 produced 290 horse / w/ a measly non tow rated 265 ft-lb torque. Gotta use data to back the b.s.

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wanted more torque than 5.3 V8 and 2.7 Ecoboost. 2.7 I-4 dual volute Turbomax (w/ 5 yr 100,000 mile drivetrain warranty) makes 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. GM 5.3 V-8 makes 355 horse / 383 ft-lb torque @ 4,100 rpm. Ford 2.7 V-6 Ecoboost makes 325 horse / 400 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. The old Ford 3.3 was truly a slug - 290 horse / with disappointing 265 ft-lb torque @ 4,000 rpm, absolutely no competition to the turbomax. Glad 3.3 discontinued. Same w/ Ram 3.6 V-6 = 305 horse / 269 ft-lb torque @ 4,800 rpm.

  • @TH-bk5hj
    @TH-bk5hj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    When you can’t afford a Ford, you buy a Chevy

  • @ryanmccullion7367
    @ryanmccullion7367 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A moped has more rumble than the Chevy. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @dan43213
    @dan43213 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have a 2.7 Silverado. 2023. At 10 miles, motor blew up!!! Truck has been a total lemon. At 14k miles now, battery has died twice in the last 2 weeks. Been towed to dealer twice. Radio lost all audio. Now tailgate latch doesn't work. I paid 50k for this POS.

  • @dhmig88
    @dhmig88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Chevy sounds like a Honda Civic.💪🏼

    • @sartainja
      @sartainja 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      😂

  • @kirkdunn1379
    @kirkdunn1379 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    those are short boxes....standard is 6'6"

  • @DH-hp7nv
    @DH-hp7nv 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No comparison…
    Ford all day

  • @CocoNut2018
    @CocoNut2018 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would get the Ford 2.7L l. Much nicer engine and interior

  • @TH-bk5hj
    @TH-bk5hj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you can’t afford the Ford you buy the Chevy

    • @MrHand-ih4sz
      @MrHand-ih4sz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤡

    • @markcasler2671
      @markcasler2671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You guys don't have a clue about f150's
      They suck in a wreck
      Ask me how I know
      Personal experience

  • @ShaneTebow
    @ShaneTebow 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No question, the Ford is much better. The 2.7 ecoboost is the most reliable one in the ecoboost line up, and the 10 speed is much more reliable and more efficient than the 8 speed in the chevy. These Chevy 2.7 fours also burn oil and sounds like a hummingbird fart ,and the gm 8 speed has had a LOT of issues. The only people who are buying these Chevys' are ones looking for the cheapest truck or blind brand loyalists who would buy a chevy even if it is a proven dumpster fire.
    Chevy COULD have had a much better option in a smaller displacement turbo 3.6 variant and the 10 speed but they chose what they did.

  • @Drpepperkev4
    @Drpepperkev4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ford F150 STX all the way

  • @conejoshiker3165
    @conejoshiker3165 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Same displacement but only one turbocharger. THATS the difference

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ford 2.7 twin turbo V-6= 325 horse / 410 ft-lb torque @ 4,250 rpm. GM 2.7 dual volute turbo I-4= 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Very comparable. One has 5 yr 100,000 drivetrain warranty.

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      correction - both make peak torque @ 3,000 rpm. GM 430 ft-lb. Ford - 400 ft-lb. That's the difference. Pay no attention number of cylinders or turbos. Dual volute turbomax makes the most torque numbers.

  • @fit4ya1975
    @fit4ya1975 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why are you always struggling to get the trucks out of their parking sport? Why don't ya park em different or go the other way man? LOL

  • @Ibrahim-tr3wu
    @Ibrahim-tr3wu หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ford 2.7 v6

  • @clints8731
    @clints8731 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Neither! Like ever. 4 cylinder? Common Chevy.

  • @evoemperor3776
    @evoemperor3776 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The 2.7 chevy engine is not supposed to compete with 2.7 ecoboost as the chevy engine was a replacement for the base 4.3 v6. 2.7 ecoboost is comparable to the chevy 5.3.

    • @willardgentry6624
      @willardgentry6624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the 2.7 is Ford's base engine. What do you want Ben Hardy to do?

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      GM Turbomax 310 horse/430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Ecoboost 325 horse / 400 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. The old 4.3 GM (285 horse / 305 ft-lb torque @ 3900 rpm) & Ford 3.3 (290 horse/265 ft-lb torque @ 4,000 rpm) were competitors. While numbers prove comparison, may as well list GM 5.3 - 355 horse / 383 ft-lb torque @ 4,100 rpm. Believe want you want, but facts/data are undisputable.

  • @andrewreyes5308
    @andrewreyes5308 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love Chevy they need to upgrade their interior for the Turbo Max. I wouldn’t be caught dead in a Ford!

  • @mrshopjulius5840
    @mrshopjulius5840 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ford won tis one but ram is better than ford hurricane

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thar hurricane is a junk engine

    • @TH-bk5hj
      @TH-bk5hj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The hurricane is the Ram engine. Not Ford. Ford is the Ecoboost

  • @adammcdowell4128
    @adammcdowell4128 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *Twin Turbo

  • @kfbell2897
    @kfbell2897 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Chevy Custom kind of looks like a 2016 Raptor, a cheap one anyway. Come on Chevy, be better.

  • @karlschauff7989
    @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GM's 2.7 is really meant to compete against Ford's 3.3 V6. That's why it replaced the 4.3 V6 that was previous the base engine in fleet trims. The 2.7 EB is a more powerful engine and will normally be cross-shopped with the 5.3. Even with the downsides of the oil pump belt behind the timing chains, plastic oil pan, and the EGR cooler, I would pick the 2.7 EB over the lower output GM 2.7T.

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      GMs uses an egr cooler on the 2.7 as well

    • @redd7188
      @redd7188 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Ford doesn't put the 3.3 engine in the F-150 anymore. The 2.7 is the base engine.

    • @ews360
      @ews360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      GM Turbomax 310 horse / 430 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Ecoboost 325 horse / 400 ft-lb torque @ 3,000 rpm. Very comparable. GM 30 ft-lb more torque, but 15 less horse. Ford 3.3 was an absolute slug - 290 horse, but a terrible naturally aspirated 265 ft-lb torque @ 4,000 rpm. Shitty tow rating, doesn't even compete w/ turbomax.

    • @karlschauff7989
      @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@redd7188 But it was when the 2.7T became the base engine. The 3.3 was the base engine until 2024. GM doesn't change engines every single year the way Ford does.

    • @karlschauff7989
      @karlschauff7989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jmc6000 I don't see any reference to an EGR or EGR cooler in any documentation on the engine. I also don't see any parts, OEM or aftermarket, for an EGR valve or EGR cooler for the GM 2.7.

  • @Edgardius
    @Edgardius 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is up with that steering wheel on the ford? Is that made out of plastic or something? It looks TERRIBLE.

  • @Commoncents321
    @Commoncents321 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Chevy sounds terrible, especially at startup.

  • @KenMcCune-wb3jp
    @KenMcCune-wb3jp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who like the ford should buy a ford pickup. Who's like the Chevrolet should buy the Chevrolet pickup

  • @willardgentry6624
    @willardgentry6624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Chevy is horrible, I can't even find a reason to pick it. Are they do for an update anytime soon?

  • @winstonrocco1981
    @winstonrocco1981 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chevy sounds like a rice burner

  • @jbug2350
    @jbug2350 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Chevrolet silverado hands down