Is Cubase 13 The Perfect DAW...? (Why Cubase May Be The Best DAW On The Market)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ค. 2024
  • In this video, Austin talks about some of his favorite features of Cubase 13, and why he always chooses Cubase over other competitor DAWs.
    Shop Our Samples, Presets, and MIDI Packs!
    makepopmusic.com
    Explore Our Start-To-Finish Production Course!
    bit.ly/3hWTpYI
    Watch Dom and Chris To Get More Cubase Content!
    / @domsigalas
    / @mixdownonline
    Try Cubase 13 Pro For 60 Days:
    bit.ly/cubase13pro
    ---
    Listen To Our Podcast!
    rss.com/podcasts/thesoundtable/
    Join Our Facebook Community - bit.ly/3nXYJe0
    Follow us on Instagram:
    / makepopmusic
    Follow us on TikTok: tinyurl.com/4k5c25vf
    Subscribe to our TH-cam channel for more content on all things pop music!
    ---
    Listen to some of my work!
    www.austinhull.com/
    spoti.fi/3Z8GaEI
    Affiliate Links To My Favorite Gear and Plugins!
    Auto-Tune Unlimited: bit.ly/3krYaWI
    DAW / Program I Use:
    new.steinberg.net/cubase​​​​​​
    Vocal Chain:
    Mic - Lauten Audio LT-386 Eden
    Preamp +Heritage EQ - Audio HA81A
    Compressor - AudioScape 76D
    I/O - RME UFX ii
    ---
    Follow Austin:
    www.austinhull.com
    / austinhull23
    www.tiktok.com/saucetinhull
    ---
    Make Pop Music is the #1 resource for independent pop producers, writers, and artists. Thank you for being a subscriber!
    My Gear:
    DAW: Cubase 13 Pro
    Desk: AZ Studio Workstations
    Main Microphone: Lauten Audio LT-386 Eden, Lewitt LCT1040
    Voiceover Mic: Lauten LS-208
    Monitors: Focal Shape 65s with Focal Sub6
    Interface: RME UFX ii
    Compressor: AudioScape 76D
    MIDI Keyboard: M-Audio Code 61
    Keyboards: Roland Juno DS88, Roland Juno 106, Arturia PolyBrute
    Guitars: Fender American Professional Stratocaster, Gibson Les Paul Studio, Taylor 214 CE Plus
    Preamps: Heritage Audio HA81A & Audient ASP800
    Extra Microphones: Advanced Audio 251, Slate ML-1, Shure SM7B, JZ BH-1, JZ V67, Lauten Audio LA-320, Lauten Audio LA-220, Lauten Audio LA-120, AKG P170, Sterling ST59
    Camera: Sony A7iv
    Lens: Sony 24-70mm f2.4
    Camera Lights: Aperture Amaran 100Xs
    Timestamps:
    Intro 0:00
    OS Compatibilities 1:07
    The Layout And GUI 1:38
    Tuning With VariAudio 3:49
    In Depth Sampler 4:04
    MIDI Remotes 4:25
    Chord Pads 4:40
    Media Browser 4:50
    Customizing Your Layouts 6:25
    Amazing Mixer Window 6:52
    Mix Snapshots 7:40
    Using Custom Colors In Cubase 8:10
    Setting Key Commands And Macros 8:37
    Track Versions and Lanes 9:28
    Render In Place 9:50
    Disable, Freeze, and Hide Tracks To Save CPU 10:50
    Cubase's Mixdown and Export Queue 11:33
    ARA Support 12:53
    VST Organization 14:25
    Cubase's Stock Plugins, FX, and Sounds 15:35
    Stock Instruments 15:50
    Cubase's FX Plugins 16:49
    Samples and Presets 18:18
    Sample Rate and Bit Depth 18:45
    Working With ATMOS and Surround Sound 18:53
    Real Time Processing With Audio 19:10
    Extract MIDI From Audio 20:02
    MIDI Editor 21:11
    Scale Assistant 21:50
    Quantizing MIDI 22:36
    Full Size MIDI Editor With Part Selector 23:00
    Step Input 23:40
    Drum Editor MIDI Layout 24:38
    Other Features Of Cubase 25:13
    Outro 25:37

ความคิดเห็น • 175

  • @Aisle9Music
    @Aisle9Music 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Used Cubase now for over 30 years, starting with a dodgy copy on an Atari ST back in the 90s. Ran a professional studio for 20 years all based on Cubase, tracking tons of projects with full live multitrack usage. Done everything from writing full orchestral stuff to hip hop to synthwave, to sync to picture. It’s given me the tools for it all.

    • @Aisle9Music
      @Aisle9Music 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Much better than Pro Tools for me, which I have used quite a lot. I think Logic is now great for the money but still prefer Cubase. Use across platforms all the time with no issues.
      My list of if I could change anything:
      1. Some simpler dedicated one job VST Instruments for say Pianos, Rhodes, Hammond, Bass, Orchestral etc. I know it’s kind of covered in Halion Sonic, but dedicated VSTs would be better. The multichannel thing in Halion Sonic doesn’t make a huge amount of sense these days.
      2. Clearly labelled classic drum machine kits for Groove Agent like 808, 909, Linn etc.
      3. Varispeed ( no DAWs have this) although there’s way of recreating, it’s not a built in feature.
      4. Still don’t find Midi Controller and Midi Mapping/ Quick Controls reliable or easy.
      5. Better options for live use. VST Live is terrible, and most VST instruments still don’t allow Midi Programs change info to change patches on the fly.
      6. Better amp sims. I actually think the built in ones aren’t too bad sounding but could be really updated and improved. Although the clean interface is excellent.
      7. A simple Filter plugin that just models various filters/ filter types and has resonance and cutoff…
      8. VST Connect SE/ PRO what happened to that, it got so confusing, but is a great idea. I actually paid money for it too 😂

    • @drinkinslim
      @drinkinslim 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I thought I would love Cubase but something as simple as punching in and out is driving me CRAZY. It's so easy in other DAWs.

  • @d.m.ebeats9013
    @d.m.ebeats9013 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is best decision I made learning cubase, I have used fl studio for years but when it comes to mixing and mastering the way cubase gets it done fast it's just amazing,I also just learned how to produce beats in cubase,and I was blown away, Now am a full time cubase producer.❤❤❤❤❤

  • @InaktiverUser
    @InaktiverUser 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I've tested many daws over the years and i'm a Cubase User just since 2 weeks so still learning but holy is this daw easy to use and has a fantastic Workflow for so many situations (coming from Ableton,flstudio,logic,adobeaudition,reaper,studioone)

  • @TheCarpenter0305
    @TheCarpenter0305 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I was an Ableton user and also tried many DAW like Pro tools (for mixing) and FL troughout the years... I think switching to Cubase was the best decision of my life lmao , i'ts absolutly perfect for composing AND mixing

  • @gyro1882
    @gyro1882 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Have used them all and always find myself coming back to Cubase. Nothing else comes close.

  • @lX-NDR
    @lX-NDR 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    btw loving that your channel grew so big! well deserved!

  • @PlagueRat-
    @PlagueRat- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve been using Cubase since 4 and learned a ton from your video! Great job, thanks 🤘

  • @maximefortinmusic
    @maximefortinmusic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    We should push more the idea of ".DAWproject" to the developpers! So one day, DAWs are only a skin and everybody can collaborate on a common file format.
    One file format to rule them all!
    For those who ask, the goal of this project is not take encompass ALL workflow/functions from all DAWs to another, it's just a better version of AAF/OMF with more compatibility for feature that get standerdized over time. E.G. Clip View from Live is more and more common (Aka Logic has a version of it now).

    • @itszacharytime
      @itszacharytime 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i dont think this will ever happen, only because companies want people to use THERE product, and having a common file type would mean people might move to deferent software.

    • @foljs5858
      @foljs5858 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@itszacharytime it does exist between BitWig and Studio One though -- a "daw project exchange" format

    •  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@itszacharytime Nope. It def could happen. It wouldnt prevent people from using a certain DAW. It would only increase the competition between DAWS which would be better for all consumers.

    • @Byron101_
      @Byron101_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      nope. don´t think so, this doesn´t work. Why should I transfer my songs to another daw? Why should I exchange my songs with other people?
      Are people so insecure or so uncreative that they can't get anything done with one DAW?
      It won't work anyway because plugins are not same on every computer. This affects the onboard plugins anyway. This is impossible.
      Where´s the problem to bounce tracks as wav files. so you can open songs in every daw! on every OS! Even after decades you can open tracks/songs.

  • @mgmthegrand
    @mgmthegrand 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Cubase is the most slept on DAW of the 21st century. Ever since FL started to gain popularity in the late 10s, no one has been paying attention to it mainly because there's this perception that "it's old"
    But for 5 years or so, Cubase has been quietly kicking ass. And 13 is just a dream. All the things we've been asking for are now included, and so much more.
    Personally I have an FL/Cubase workflow. I use FL as a sort of sketchpad cos it's quick. But before long, I run into limitations. When I need to edit, record, and mix, Cubase is KING. Nothing in FL beats the audio and midi editing capabilities of Cubase. And the customisation is unparalleled. I still want to create my own macros. It's also great that you keep learning new things abt it even years after using it.
    There's a reason why Cubase is still around. It's still the best all-rounder DAW compared to all the others.

  • @larspothast
    @larspothast 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I’m staying on Cubase for sure. Will upgrade to 13 after finishing my current project.

    • @mobilee1587
      @mobilee1587 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you can open your project in cubase 13 . including that project done in cubase 5

  • @grahamwitcher105
    @grahamwitcher105 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent demonstration of the wonderful World of Cubase! Without doubt the best DAW....Thanks

  • @paloche_beatz
    @paloche_beatz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I use Fl studio for making Beats and Cubase for big projects(recording vocal, live instruments, mixing ,mastering ect.....)
    Hi from France Guys.

  • @hodshonf
    @hodshonf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Respect your channel. Great topics, well presented.
    I tried Cubase 10 for 3 months exclusively
    I nearly lost my mind.
    Not my workflow.
    Studio One Pro v6.x is my DNA

    • @Mrhehon
      @Mrhehon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Due to comments like yours, I tried studio one for six months. Compared to Cubase it was awful. So many things missing (control room for example) midi editors not even close, stock plugins not a scratch on the Steinberg ones, even the terminology is bad (groups, buss, link) plug in manger awful in Studio one. I own a residential studio and I can't even imagine being able to use studio one in a professional environment.

  • @joonasautero661
    @joonasautero661 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was the correct way of presenting something. Liked your style, it was easy and enjoyable to follow. I might get Cubase some sunny day. Can´t justify it now, because already had several Daws.

  • @grahamwitcher105
    @grahamwitcher105 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fabulous demonstration championing what is IMHO the best DAW! Thanks.

  • @InspelaRecords
    @InspelaRecords 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I e just recently returned to Cubase after a long time away from it. Best decision I ever made! Got Absolute 6 to go with Pro 13 too and picked up a UR44C interface in the new Fire Red colour. Very happy indeed. I too - like I’ve seen other people say - started out with Cubase on the Atari ST back in 1990 and it’s good to be back with it on the Mac.

  • @nelsonmoloi3767
    @nelsonmoloi3767 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi I like the audio. And midi part .wow it makes life easier

  • @aquadiamondsekreto5280
    @aquadiamondsekreto5280 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have no complaints with cubase 13, its perfect for what i do. Hasn't been a time where i sit there contemplating about what they can do better to it, evey upgrade is just a treat. Been at it since sx2.
    And yes, I've tried other DAWs for comparison and out of curiosity, but none have been my cup of tea. Studio one is the only other DAW I can rely on for different option since they are similar in many ways, but would never replace cubase with it.

  • @PetexZen
    @PetexZen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mannnn I started on cubase and switched to protools 5 years ago. And midi editing / programming and vocal tuning is so much better than protools. Didn’t realize there was a browse sample and preview section too. Dang it haha

  • @jeremythornton433
    @jeremythornton433 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I first used Cubase when my friend had it on an old Atari computer. When I decided to do the home studio thing I went straight for Cubase Artist 7. I upgraded to Pro shortly after and now I"m on 12 Pro. I will be upgrading in the near future. My biggest gripe with Cubase is that it doesn't integrate well with my Presonus Studiolive series 3 mixer. My mixer is my input interface and for that it's great. I have several synths, guitars and vocal microphones and I hate patching cables so this way I can have everything plugged in and ready to go. What I want is to be able to actually mix with my mixer. Not have to mouse with the Cubase mixer. I'm a "hands on the faders" type of guy. Did a lot of pro audio live mixing.

  • @synthoelectro
    @synthoelectro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    To me Cubase is the one Daw that I believe will serve as a perfect composing software for a future smooth jazz album I've been brainstorming since 2000.

    • @830jkl
      @830jkl 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That’s awesome, I also write and produce smooth jazz, truth be told, I’m one of the co-founders of genre itself, (Pieces Of A Dream). 🎹♥️

  • @andesneko
    @andesneko 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like to play around with other DAWs as they can make me think of ideas I wouldn't otherwise, but Cubase is my home.
    IMO, it is the best and most complete DAW, but because of that, it comes with a learning curve that is veeeery steep for most new comers.

  • @alainpatry
    @alainpatry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I love 13. I find it snappier and more stable than 12. I'd like it if they added the Nuendo extras in Cubase rather than have them as separate programs.

    • @ontreitube
      @ontreitube 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes..we need Cubase ultimate

    • @830jkl
      @830jkl 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ontreitubeNow that sounds like a plan. 🎹♥️

  • @oldtimer666
    @oldtimer666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you make a video covering melodyne? Like sampling with melodyne, manual vocal tunning, harmony creation? I havent seen anyone touch this thing on youtube while i have seen so many pro producers using melodyne to manipulate their samples and recordings

  • @Jala_haru
    @Jala_haru 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I'm sad Cubase doesn't get the love it deserves.

  • @GuyVignati
    @GuyVignati 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You should consider how great is the ARA integration in Cubase/Nuendo. I mean you can open in it Spectralayers and now also Wavelab (yes a short version but still…). I don’t care that much about melodyne since you have Vari Audio which is very good and easy to use.
    I’m waiting for a streamlined Dorico version to be opened via ARA: this would have the potential to change the film scoring industry.

  • @berntfuruberg9423
    @berntfuruberg9423 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Been using Pro Tools for 15 years, moved over to Logic and then Ableton. I liked both Logic and Ableton for producing but was missing a lot when mixing and routing audio so I gave Cubase a shot. Since 2 years back thats the DAW I'm sticking with. For me I want a DAW that can handle all the steps from writing to mastering and Cubase does that. Instead of using two I only need Cubase. Do I like Cubase? Yess and No... I think it´s very slow for most things (basically the same feeling as Pro Tools) and has a steep learning curve. It feels very "windows" (with that I mean a lot of information everywhere which clutter up your mind) and needs a lot of customization to work nicely. Cubase has features you showed us that is above most DAWs and the way it handles both midi and audio with precision (especially when editing) is what makes it for me. I think it´s sad that DAWs more and more start trusting people to make customizations to their program instead of just fixing a lot of them from start. Some of the most basic things is often not even having shortcuts. We are often lazy and many end up with DAWs that feel clumpsy just because they didn't assigned a macro or some midi editor voodoo.

    •  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its nearly 2024 & Cubendo still only has 8 sends max per track.

  • @udderhippo
    @udderhippo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I wish Cubase had something like Ableton's Racks or FL's Patcher. They're so good.

    • @Doty6String
      @Doty6String 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cubase is designed for
      Musicians that play instruments. That’s my take away. So it fits my brain well.

    • @udderhippo
      @udderhippo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Doty6StringMusicians that play instruments use racks of gear though. Pedals, loopers, outboard effects, stereo setups, dual amp splitters, with customisable controllers to easily drive complex routing setups and so on. Ableton and FL already have good equivalent solutions and Cubase is lagging behind here.

    • @Doty6String
      @Doty6String 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@udderhippo for example?

    • @udderhippo
      @udderhippo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Doty6String Unsure if you want examples of classic hardware racks (like 80s/90s/00s effects racks) or in the DAWs. For hardware racks, look at the live rigs of any major touring guitarist of those decades. In the DAWs, Ableton has a device called Racks and FL Studio has a device called Patcher. Both of these allow you to make racks of plugins and create your own macro controls to "play" the rack like you would with a hardware rack + controller. You can create parallel chains and control them with a single macro (mapped to say a foot controller), switch between several complex chains instantly when playing live and loads more cool stuff.

    • @Doty6String
      @Doty6String 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ippo yea I have ableton, most players these days do use modelers, and synths, some pre's for live instruments, and A LOT of midi. cubase is centered around a musical approach to creating audio and music, where ableton strikes me as a modular synth approach but in a daw, and geared for sample manipulation. I own cubase, ableton, and pro tools. for recording a band and editing audio its PT all the way. for musician creative stuff cubase for sure.

  • @Domofavors
    @Domofavors 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm really considering Cubase I currently use Logic pro for tracking vocals, mixing and I use FL Studio for production. That being said is there a strumming effect or strumizer in cubase?

  • @GadzhevStyleSample
    @GadzhevStyleSample 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello! I have a question, I have a Mac mini M2 and I'm using Cubase 13 pro, and I want to use an apollo twin X sound card for recording input and an RME ADI 2 Dac FS for output to use the best converter. on Logic pro it became very easy but on Cubase I can't handle it. Thank you so much

  • @jackc8120
    @jackc8120 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can you share how you have setup your machine for the lowest latency? What tweaks have you done on Windows machine? Thanks

  • @RealCbase
    @RealCbase 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am a Cubase user for dacades now. 13 also is really great, but i hate this blurry faders to death! Makes me feel i am drunk when ever i open Cubase 🤣. Beside this, i am still in love.

  • @apkrishnamusic
    @apkrishnamusic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Logic Pro has ARA support too 😊

  • @hosseinsaraiee
    @hosseinsaraiee หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    no music without cubase 😍😍😍😍

  • @evancourtney5610
    @evancourtney5610 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What program do you use when you need to work remotely with a client on mixing or other stuff in the DAW?

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cubase and if I need to screen cast to them live I'll use Audiomovers to send out the audio and video

  • @alaukikg
    @alaukikg หลายเดือนก่อน

    brother which midi u r using ?

  • @stripedelicstudios
    @stripedelicstudios 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm Ableton for life but I can appreciate Cubase

  • @rasolzamini8678
    @rasolzamini8678 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cubase Power forever!!!:)

  • @RagdollReacts
    @RagdollReacts 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Simple yes( for me ) XD But it always depends on the personal perspective and workflow.

  • @acrosonusmastering5361
    @acrosonusmastering5361 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Move to studio one long-time ago (2.5) when restart audio, now studio one or cubase both are close (even in interface) and do great job. but miss the autoalign of cubase, use melodyne it take time. I don't produce but have fun with maschine, it's simple and effective NI stuff are good for no sound designer like me, and import in presonus for mix....

  • @matthewhatch3393
    @matthewhatch3393 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cubase rules

  • @MrVleker
    @MrVleker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the C13 trial but I cant even import audio without it crashing

  • @djerikfox
    @djerikfox หลายเดือนก่อน

    the only thing that cubase does not have and pt, logic and st1 have is routing folders..or track stack in logic...they are amazing...

  • @AlexDMast
    @AlexDMast 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i would love an updated video of making indie pop from the ground up. something like 2 dumb kids by levent geiger

  • @parabot2
    @parabot2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Killer thanx , maybe if you wanted to do more Cubase content do short 2 min videos showing your fav features and tricks .

  • @MichelBarbaro
    @MichelBarbaro หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow! Watching 26 minutes video of this guy is ... intense! 😅 Great content!

  • @daneelb
    @daneelb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how do you pinch to zoom in cubase with trackpad?

    • @drvoodoo3073
      @drvoodoo3073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m guessing out of the box: you can’t. You would need a third party utility like Better Touch Tool to assign the zoom in/zoom out key commands to Pinch In/Pinch Out.

  • @feiloubeats
    @feiloubeats 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Team Cubase!

  • @hassejansson
    @hassejansson 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    cubase is awesome

  • @augustus6148
    @augustus6148 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you tune entire projects to a specific frequency yet?

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean to make a song in 432hz or something? For that just set the master tuning of each plugin. Or just put a shifter in your master out at -32cents

    • @augustus6148
      @augustus6148 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @MakePopMusic easier said than done man when you have a 5950x processor maxed out with over 100 channels and like 30 - 40 instruments. Any pitch shifter heavily distorts the music and trying to keep track of every track is super time consuming.

  • @daviHuggMonster
    @daviHuggMonster หลายเดือนก่อน

    funny...there are things popping up that my Reaper has for a long time. As a home user the price of of these DAWs are not in my budget. I do use wavelab elements tho. The only thing that would interest me is the sampler, reaper's own is really meh so I need vst instead

  • @devincrenshaw4865
    @devincrenshaw4865 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a discord?

  • @modiolo
    @modiolo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    u are missing out if not using the Control Room. is veeery good

    • @modiolo
      @modiolo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      other than that jeje

  • @Ytsssss364
    @Ytsssss364 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the lifetime free updates, perhaps???

  • @BlueFireStudio
    @BlueFireStudio 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are there any other users here who are suffering from the software's ability to Work with Plugins that consume more processing power and that way it Reaches overload very quickly.?
    Does anyone know if this is because the base of the software has not been Upgraded and only additions and upgrades are added to an old " engine "
    For example, the amount of sends per channel is not increased,
    If the Software was upgraded from the base it would have already been Increased.........?

  • @DohBoi863
    @DohBoi863 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Studio One has my ❤ loved Cubase back in the day and it's my 2nd choice for an A.I.O. DAW. But pairing Bitwig with Studio One is absolutely phenomenal and I recommend everyone try it at least once.

    • @JoeyFTL
      @JoeyFTL 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which for what tasks?

    • @Byron101_
      @Byron101_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JoeyFTL Bitwig is for EDM sound nerds with too much time. ^^ I don´t need this "random" Clip Mode or modulation in each direction. (I´m in EDM too, but with Cubase)

    • @DohBoi863
      @DohBoi863 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Byron101_ Well since Studio One is going subscription I have decided to go back to Cubase for recording and mixing audio. I've never tried to make any beats inside of it I've always used FL, do you have any recommendations for tutorials on making beats in Cubase ?

  • @capoman1
    @capoman1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's sad that Pro Studio is considered the only game in town. I use Reaper and stand by it. But I used Cubase for a long time before and beside Reaper. And I think people use Pro studio because thy think it's forced.

  • @killuhkaySD
    @killuhkaySD 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Without cubase the world wouldn’t have vst plugins in the first place

    • @stephenr2434
      @stephenr2434 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Without Ford the world wouldn't have cars!

    • @killuhkaySD
      @killuhkaySD หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stephenr2434 without sperm banks the world wouldn’t have you.

  • @Doty6String
    @Doty6String 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Command + right click> process, reverse.

  • @mystikrebel1089
    @mystikrebel1089 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yep cubase 13 is very good and im enjoying it

  • @ed_ms
    @ed_ms 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    As far as features go Cubase it seems almost endless, judging from your overview. Honestly, quite impressive.
    On the other hand, personally, I find the UI has way too much going on. All those menubars, tabs, sub windows, buttons, text all over the place,.... it almost makes me dizzy, lol.
    I prefer the more uniform minimalistic layout from Ableton.

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You can hide all of that if you want

    • @ed_ms
      @ed_ms 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MakePopMusic ok, that would help for sure

  • @placeoflace
    @placeoflace หลายเดือนก่อน

    Essentially?

  • @Doty6String
    @Doty6String 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a Cubase user they need to fix some stuff. Mainly the timeline is a joke. Pro tools and ableton for example have flawless timelines. You can click in the timeline anywhere and it locks to the grid. Fades in pro tools are flawless. The pinch to zoom in ableton works. It doesn’t in Cubase. The clip manipulation in Cubase sucks visually and making fades is so clunky. I also hate that Cubase half baked features and then releases them letting us deal with it. That said I do think Cubase is the best DAW for crafting music. And for sure the best for composing to picture

  • @mobilee1587
    @mobilee1587 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Team Cubase(artist)😂

  • @j0n.p
    @j0n.p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Logic, Ableton, Fl Studio and Studio One all handle drum programming/sequencing better than Cubase. Groove Agent is clunky and overly confusing, and programming drums with diamonds just isn't for me. Other than that, I like it the best.

  • @trollingisasport
    @trollingisasport 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cubased

  • @CombatCatYT
    @CombatCatYT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love Ableton as its workflow works the best for my personal style. I think if I had a Apple Laptop I would use Logic Pro more. But I already bought Ableton and am familiar with it.

  • @MattySagz
    @MattySagz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Daw's it exist? The perfect daw? Yes, you just need to find it yourself

  • @oldtimer666
    @oldtimer666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2:26 that function was always there in logic pro along with the bus routing featue now they trying to copy stuff lol .Shifted from cubase to logic pro 3 years back, tbh i dont really miss anything about cubase except the studio control and live cueing option which is missing. Other than that i find logic easy to use and has a really small learning curve

  • @bazzmix
    @bazzmix 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cubase appears small on my Dell PC … I love cubase but can’t use it because of this limitation

  • @Solayman.musician
    @Solayman.musician 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    FL Gang

  • @panagope
    @panagope 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Actually all the features you described , also Studio One has ! They are extremely similar !

  • @yahymusic
    @yahymusic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    probably there will be someone using ableton or fl that disagrees. the best daw is the daw you know best. end of discussion, its not about the ride, its the rider

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I say that within the first 30 seconds

    • @lX-NDR
      @lX-NDR 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i use ableton and cubase... cubase gives me the results i want...ableton suprises me in creativity to grow as artist

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah ableton has some wild sound design stuff! Cubase is getting there with their Sampler and warp modes but Ableton just has so much weirddd shit you can do@@lX-NDR

    • @lX-NDR
      @lX-NDR 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MakePopMusic yeah i know. but im also still a diehard cubase user. it has great stuff only cubase can do in my opinion. your music is also a representation of howmuch you can achive with cubase! i love both for their own things. i love cubase sampler! easy and quick for great ideas.

  • @davebassP5
    @davebassP5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super stable for up to 5mins 😂

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Literally never had it crash once. Lol

    • @davebassP5
      @davebassP5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MakePopMusic i must be unlucky. 2 PC’s and a MBP and all have had issues. I guess if programs were bug free we wouldn’t get all those bug fix updates 🤔
      My comment about 5mins is real, new project, just setting it up and less than 5 mins CB is gone.

    • @RudalPL
      @RudalPL 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davebassP5 I've been using Cubase since version 8.
      I had really big problems with C10 to the point I started looking at Reaper to switch maybe.
      C11 was a step up but still not really stable. Since C12 came out I had no problems whatsoever.
      I have severely upgraded my PC though in between C11 and C12, so....

    • @davebassP5
      @davebassP5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RudalPL i can easily make CB quit 100% of the time. Just by loading track presets and then clicking someone else on the screen. This only happens if i use the drop down load/save method and not clicking on the name. To me that’s a bug and i appreciate not everyone will have it.

  • @SeanofAllTrades
    @SeanofAllTrades 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reaper does almost all of these things and more. Only DAW that's comparable.

  • @marioaguilera9463
    @marioaguilera9463 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Well , studio one is called the future standard, I think that should mean something, and the way presonus included the dolby atmos suite it's just killing all the daw, drag and drop functions, mixing workflow, mastering suite, easy setup for instruments, audio editing its just gettin better and better, I don't think cubase has nothing to do against studio one.

    • @jovonnepa
      @jovonnepa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Studio One is the business. Nothing against other DAWs, but S1 is the standard in my eyes.

    • @marioaguilera9463
      @marioaguilera9463 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jovonnepa Yeah, I mean, cubase is good, I love the interface, actually S1 is pretty ugly haha not very inspiring to the eyes as cubase, but besides that, I think we can stay confident in saying that S1 is bringing different things than any other DAW could offer

    • @ronmaster5220
      @ronmaster5220 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The difference between the two is: THE final result on every project.
      A project made in cubase is more clean when you export it. On the other hand. The same project exported in s1 is ok but it sounds a little bit dirty. I proved it with processing a project with the same plugins on both. I guess the engineering and architecture of Cubase's engine in more deep on its construction than s1.

    • @Byron101_
      @Byron101_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      erm... There are so few people using Dolby Atmos. ^^This is not a figurehead. And no one needs a master suite page in these times. Nowadays mastering is done in big arrange window - streaming today. Master suite is useful for CD. But Wavelab is much better. Studio One is not good in case of it´s stock plugins and sample content. Cubase is way better. I prefer Cubase render options and multiple cycle marker. Cant´live without SamplerTrack for sounddesign. Cubase´s mix console ist the best on the market. former S1 hardcore user here. Drag and drop in all directions are not the best workflow.

    • @marioaguilera9463
      @marioaguilera9463 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ronmaster5220 a DAW doesn't have a sound, you can make a null test and the sound will be cancelled 100% , digital audio is 1 and 0, this is a topic very discussed but you can make a test between both DAW or any DAW and the sound is the same.

  • @iamNathanGreen
    @iamNathanGreen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Used Cubase before but I'm now #TeamLogic.

    • @gyro1882
      @gyro1882 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're pretty much the same thing

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i've used logic a bit but I can't get past the GarageBand GUI hahaha

    • @oldtimer666
      @oldtimer666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same i shifted after 3 years of cubase crashing every now and then. Not a single day that i miss cubase

    • @iamNathanGreen
      @iamNathanGreen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MakePopMusic I see your point haha. But if you customize it a little bit with some nicer icons etc, I actually started to like it.

    • @drvoodoo3073
      @drvoodoo3073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iamNathanGreenI don’t use icons at all. Just colors. It looks very sleek and utilitarian now because I customized Logic’s UI

  • @user-ei5tz4ui6x
    @user-ei5tz4ui6x 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cakewalk)🎉

  • @bestdisco1979
    @bestdisco1979 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No is the answer

  •  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cubendo 13 is has so many bugs.

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Literally haven't had any bugs and I've been beta testing 13 for months

    •  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@MakePopMusic Well you're either being sponsored by this vid or ignorant to the many discussions on the official Steinberg forum. Random CPU spikes plague many systems including mine (14900K + RTX 4080). Even on blank/new projects. Disabling CPU core 0 sometimes resolves it for a few minutes. Custom RGB colors do not retain their value. Try entering a specici RGB/HSV level & watch it change in the values section. Oh & White GUI render glitches are happening.

  • @drvoodoo3073
    @drvoodoo3073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What Logic has that Cubase (and most other DAWS) doesn't:
    1. A single version with the complete set of features at a single and very inexpensive price point: $200, Cubase Pro costs more than double that
    2. Free .x version updates (been getting FREE updates since 2013 after a one time purchase of Logic X (10.0.0)
    3. Producers Packs and Logic Demo Projects by actual Billboard chart topping Grammy Award winning artists like Billie Ellish, Lil Nas X, Mark Ronson, Oak Felder, Take A Daytrip
    4. Alchemy, Camel Crusher, Camel Phat (Phat FX), Camel Space (Step FX) comes stock in Logic, none of these plugins work in newer 64 bit only computers
    What I wish Logic had that Cubase has:
    1. Per Note Expression
    2. Macros

    • @deherrera94
      @deherrera94 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Apple products are not cheap..and that "free" update is "buy a new mac every 2 years" if you want that update to work properly so actually in the big term is more expensive....the real Free update software is actually FL Studio. But Logic is not a good example of "inexpensive" stuff. Just saying hehe.

    • @drvoodoo3073
      @drvoodoo3073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deherrera94 I’m using the latest version of Logic on a 2012 Mac mini using Open Core Legacy Patcher. If you know what you’re doing you can get a hell of a lot of value. I haven’t bought a new computer for over ten years, so no, you don’t have to buy a new Mac “every two years”. I bought Logic X back in 2013 as well. So yeah. Hell of a lot of a value. I will agree though, the winner in terms of true value really is FL, because of the lifetime free updates. If/when Logic jumps to whatever the next main version is (Logic 11 or whatever it’s going to be called), I WILL have to finally pay to get it. I know it’s not the case for FL, the free updates are for life for whichever version you own.

    • @foundpat
      @foundpat 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@deherrera94 Not true really you don't have to update every 2 years to make software work.i had my last mac for about 7 years with all the updates.

    • @deherrera94
      @deherrera94 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@foundpatits important to read before trying to dismiss an argument :) i was very especific in saying Logic. Sure if you use reaper, cubase or another daw is not much biggie...but using logic means you have to change your computer sooner than later...the latest version requires to have ventura or latest version...since the comment was talking about 2013 updates, well actually the 2015 and older systems are not going to be available for updating anymore. That means if you want to have the latest version of logic, you have to change computer. :) btw...maybe is not always 2 years, ill give you that, but sooner than later apple comes for your money.

    • @foundpat
      @foundpat 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@deherrera94 I only commented because of the exaggeration regarding the frequency of needing to change your computer. And that is the only bit I referred to. I will be getting cubase myself but as a current logic user I just thought I would make that point.😊

  • @SoniqSounds
    @SoniqSounds 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Team Logic!

  • @estevancarlos
    @estevancarlos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anyone stating Cubase is the best is a person who likely hasn't used Studio One. It shares a large amount of the same features but with a more sensible interface and user experience. It's big upgrade.

  • @Iamdanybazz
    @Iamdanybazz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Logic is it 👍

  • @gzappa
    @gzappa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not much change, then?

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      New features include the left fader window, a few new FX and sample libraries, even better ATMOS support, MIDI part selector, the new VocalChain plugin, updates to the Mix Console, updates to the Chord Pads and a bunch of other stuff. Definitely a solid upgrade in my opinion.

  • @rasxiel2493
    @rasxiel2493 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hmmm Studio One can do all that and more

  • @nicholasrobinson8798
    @nicholasrobinson8798 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do how to do a Michael Jackson song.

  • @vptrxvx
    @vptrxvx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This need mix console is not as good as CB12 in my opinion, and for that reason im back to 12 from 13

  • @Freikorps81
    @Freikorps81 หลายเดือนก่อน

    blah blah blah! Long time cubase user. the cubase updates/upgrades over the years were quite underwhelming and overpriced. that's cubase! have fun with steinberg crap!

  • @RK-iy3rz
    @RK-iy3rz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    studio one's arranger teack way better than cubase 's.
    you can't even browse plugins alphabetically in cubase. yes, cubase has more engine under the hood but the workflow sucks

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Plugins are in alphabetical order 😂

    • @Byron101_
      @Byron101_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      nope. In Cubase you can have multiple arranger playlist! and you can try parts in realtime > without touching the arrangement! And you can generate a new project from this Cubase arranger. All this is not possible with the rudimentary S1 drag/drop by "hand" arranger... Workflow is in Cubase way better.

  • @WHaTcAniSaY-nv9yk
    @WHaTcAniSaY-nv9yk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't listen to people with tattoos. Sorry kid goodbye.

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      those are birth marks idiot

  • @cakershake
    @cakershake 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Any good producer knows it's got very little to do with the DAW and more to do with how YOU like to work. I use FL Studio and there is NOTHING I can't do on that that another DAW can do. Essentially it's personal preference and that's it. Why you pushing Cubase so hard? Something in it for you? Don't answer that, it's too obvious

    • @MakePopMusic
      @MakePopMusic  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I literally said that in the video.
      Also, there are a ton of features other DAWs have that FL doesn't, but it doesn't make FL worse.
      Also, I'm not pushing Cubase at all. I'm simply showing why it works for ME. I get thousands of comments on this channel and our socials about why I use Cubase so I wanted to make a video showing my thoughts on it. I don't care what anyone else uses at all.

    • @gyro1882
      @gyro1882 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He literally explains that he's just making this video to show us why it works for him. Why does there have to be a hidden agenda??

    • @cakershake
      @cakershake 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      reported the video@@MakePopMusic

    • @user-bv7ww4wr3n
      @user-bv7ww4wr3n หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try doing time signature changes or tempo changes in FL Studio...., I'll wait 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @nukenoly8751
    @nukenoly8751 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I own all the major DAWs and must say Nuendo (Über Cubase) is my favorite Go make some tunes

  • @JoelWilliamHarrison
    @JoelWilliamHarrison 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes it’s called Logic 🫡
    Jokes, whatever works for the person!

    • @drvoodoo3073
      @drvoodoo3073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Definitely Logic for me!

  • @recsoares
    @recsoares 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cubase Power forever!!!:)