It only sounds epic if You ignore all the ridiculous things hes saying. Lol he is even searching wikipedia oh snap it's all nonsense. Dark energy, mysterious forces, special hidden particles that have been hidden for billions of years. They wonder why people believe in flat earth seems more plausible than material older than both space and Time. This guy is so crazy you would assume expansion faster at one point
okay, scientist Fredo - what do you know that these brilliant scientists don't? Science will always correct itself if/when new data is discovered. As it stands now, the only error is that other data about this vast universe are yet unknown to us - that's not "error". Today's amazing scientific methods are only recently available as we continue to send out probes that gather data otherwise unknown to us. So, is that really surprising?
@@tega588 What? the back seat wannabe scientists? I'm confident the legitimate scientists currently working on all the research of the universe are doing the best possible job ANYONE can do. As time goes on, they always make more discoveries or invent better ways for obtaining data and completing studies. But anyone criticizing the current science - the same science which has already brought us so incredibly far - is nothing but a backward blowjob. If anyone here thinks they can do better - good luck!
Yes, some people already stated this but I also think that our "local universe" is only a small part of the entire universe, and our big bang only contained the matter that it gathered prior to exploding. It's highly likely that there were other stars and matter that were in the process of being sucked in when the ball reached critical mass and exploded outward. Other stars may have been heading towards us and continued that way even while the local universe expanded and spread outward. I think gravity sucked in space, which is why the universe is now "expanding" as it is simply "unstretching" back to the way it was before gravity sucked everything into the middle where the big bang happened. Other big bangs are happening now in other parts of the non-local universe, and likely have been doing so for trillions of years. Eventually parts of other local big bangs will spread out and reach the gravitational pull of ours, and parts of ours will reach others and become part of the next big bang in a different part of space. There most likely are wandering stars and planets from all over the universe that travel across the universe at any time.
That's like... milkdromeda*9 marioplexes. Higgs' disruption would be dwarfed in comparison to The Cold Spot happening again. Wait a second, is Rick and Morty just them travelling their own non-local universe? It's like a local universe is a city and a non-local universe is a state, while Rick is on a state tour with his grandson Morty... or maybe I'm looking into how reality coincides with fiction too much.
@@BambinaSaldana we are not alone? It's call *observable* universe for a reason. I would say outerverse but that wouldn't make sense either since we are just a jumble of what there is beyond this universe.
What's even scarier is that this star is not simply appearing older than the Universe but also hasn't reached its red giant form, so nobody knows how long it will last.
The creators of the universe : bro we need to update this damn game . Just imagine we are a game and it been 13 months for the creators so we are getting updates every second
Not every star turns into a red giant, different kinds of stars do different things, just like ours (the sun) will never super nova. It does become a red giant though.
My best theory for this is: Scientists have already calculated the rough age of the universe. That means several billion years ago, before the big bang, there was something before our universe. What if this star is somehow remnants of a previous universe that collapsed on itself?
So the thing about the big bang, it was the start of space and time. Before it, there was no space for anything to exist. And there was no change at all. Everything that exists now was packed together in a tiny pinprick of space. So no, even if somehow a previous universe had existed and collapsed, it would have destroyed everything in the process. This star is almost certainly younger than the universe and its just an accuracy problem, barring anything crazy going on. During the absolute beginning of our universe, we also know atoms didnt exist. So theres no way your theory could work.
"Scientist were shocked, but then, further calculations were made, however, these calculations proved that this was that, therefore, they began to understand, but then, it turned out that that was this, and then physicist believed that that was responsible for this, however, this makes no sense, because based on past results scientist have proven this was that, furthermore, we insert as many transitional words as possible, and we've determined that we don't actually know the age of the star."
All we have is theory...Theories offer no definitive proof...Really good guess or assumption is how they should be described, but that would discredit scientists and their massive egos.
@@rosieporgie "Theories offer no definitive proof" No shit Sherlock, that's not how a scientific theory is used. And that was quite quick for completely discrediting an entire theory just from a video instead of first doing some simple fact checking. If you fact checked their figure of the second time we approximated the age of the star you would've realized the video missed a very big part of the approximation. The error rate is + or - 800 million years. Which makes it barely within the realm of possibility with what we currently know. Which isn't a big deal if it's still wrong. There is still much to learn about star formation and star aging. Further showing the absurdity in your comment, which is quite ironic at the ending. To try to say since we do not know the age of this star, the rest of the theory is wrong, is absurd. Especially if you know what a scientific theory is, which I doubt you know. A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. It's almost like theories are based on our current understanding via facts available...oh wait. It's almost like they are designed to changed when proven to be wrong and occasional get minor updates.
The thing is, TH-cam doesn't show the actual maths and computer work behind all this which is TBH Boring. So even though school is boring, you will get to know all these things much more comprehensively and correctly. Schools all over the world can and should improve the method of delivering information though.
Woooooow I LOVED THE ENERGY YOUR VIDEO HAD AND ALL THE KNOWLEDGE ADDED TOGETHER, YOU CREATED THE BEST MOST EASY TO COMPREHEND VIDEO IVE EVER SEEN,WOW IM LOVING YOUR WORK!PLEASE CONTINUE AND BRING MANY MORE VIDEOS JUST LIKE THIS 1
Well being honest we’re not sure of any of this. It’s essentially theory, that’s built on a theory, that built on a theory. The human race is basically grasping for straws when it comes to the cosmos. Not discounting these theories, just saying we as humans have become a big arrogant. I love the line form the Avengers movies, “your only a genius on earth”. I know it’s from a movie but when you think about it, you realize that it’s very hard to depict what happened before humans beings invented the written language. So imagine trying to to understand what happened billions of years ago. Of the human race survives long enough I imagine some of these theories will turn out to be bullshit, while others prove to be at least in the ball park of the actual truth. But if what we think we know is correct, we’ll probably be extinct before we actually get to the truth. If we’re going by the time clock the theories give us, the earth is due for another extinction type event any year now.
Killumination well there is... we know how fast certain processes take place... therefore we know how long it takes to get certain products of those processes (like ores, certain types of stones etc.) some of these processes take millions of years therefore we have an estimate of how old the Earth is minimally. (Spoiler its way older than 10k years, and I hope you where joking, can already see the 8 year old normies replying with r/woooosh)
Space is a figment of nasa's imagination they feed you paintings and cgi photocompersit pictures. And petrified wood as moon rocks. This 8 year old has done his research do you think it's about time you did.
Sarah it’s an inside joke pertaining to the men who rap3 children at the DoD who run organized gang stalking. Crazy huh! Like mental disorders or what..? Haha
I have a small theory. What if the big bang wasn't the beginning, but a reset. Mabey the big bang happened because a previous universe was too old and so expanded rapidly causing a explosion like how stars explode and Die. But then this star had survived the big bang reset and now exists as a last piece of the old universe.
@@geraldeh7291 yep. Its all hyphotesis which they even claimed that they did come calculation error about the universe age for the past 20 years. Thats why FE believers appear like a mushroom. 😂
No it just proves this channel is full of shit. It took me like 10 seconds to look it up on Wikipedia and see that our estimates both for the age of this star and for the age of the universe have a range of uncertainty, and it's only by ignoring this range that someone would claim the star was older.
@M 40 mmmm not really a singularity if not all matter made it to the party... Like what, Methuselah's just gonna wait outside while everything condenses into a singular point of everything and then stays chilling when they all burst back out onto the lawn?
this video is the best thing at saying something and gives absolutely no reasoning or details whatsoever. it’s literally just oh they thought this then this then this with little to no input ever
Basically, everything we know and hear about the universe is based on assumptions and imagination. Talking about millions and billions of years, yet we argue about things that happened 2000 years ago. People are fucking delusional.
@chrisw Word! People get manipulated and brainwashed very easy, especially now, because Nasa became very good at this, after tens of years of practicing.
“Scientist made even more calculations, it turns out-“ Ad: smoking can cause consequences. When did we need scientists to figure out that smoking can cause consequences.
Kind of yeah. But what you're referring to, the hunger for knowledge, is an unfillable belly, an unquenchable thirst ... Think about it. The more you learn the more you want to learn right? From what you said though I know that you probably have a death phobia. It's a sign of high intelligence if it's any consolation.
Yeah, but by then we would turn into either phyical gods, cyborgs or bodiless consciousness (ether gods) so highly intelligent they wouldn't need to have their own planet because it could use whatever bodies and entities existing on whatever planets birth new life to possess at will. Which basically feels like it's already been done. Soooo it all depends whether you'd rather be recycled and be fluid like or reduced down to nothing on a soul/conscious level but maintain body in ai form. And you will have to take into account that as the universe ages new life is formed... you might not like the phyical body options but hey, at least you'd be conscious... then if you decide to go the god/cyborg route you run the risk of running into life as smart or smarter that might want to just end you just because...like they do now. 🤣 we have options though. As long as we have a delicate balance between tech advancement here on earth and keeping this planet from cracking like an egg.
@@SirArthurTheGreat 🤣 I wouldn't disagree but look at the masses that don't g.a.s about that or their supposed apocalyptic end. In their minds it is what it is. Then... there's God vs Gods/demigods with much less restriction and who don't really care for much laws in general. That would be interesting .
So no one is gonna mention the clever star's name? Methuselah is the name of the guy who lived the longest in the bible. The bible says he lived 969 years.
Don't open your third eye or take DMT, you might invite some h*rny succubi/incubi, a guy claims some "demon" busted out his cheeks against his will(rape). proof: th-cam.com/video/jthU9G5PSho/w-d-xo.html
i hope that, when i die, my beliefs of an afterlife are true and i get to explore space freely without anything stopping me. and then maybe reincarnate when im done exploring space
@@darkshaman7087 it still existed before we called it dark and night 😂😂😂 same as how time still existed before we called it time. Don't think we made it exist if we just gave it a name
@@MeadowBrook2000 lol are you telling me to Google for sources or that the source is Google? I can certainly Google the information on this but I'm not the one posting a video on the subject and claiming "scientists say". And obviously Google is not a source so, thanks?
Metamorphical speaking you are saying the universe replied noooooo qhen Maury said the DNA test are in. In the case of methuselah, Universe, you are the father! But in this case science has to pay support. Big bang concocted by a priest is the lie told on Maury. Next week we will have Mary, Joseph and Yeshua (Jesus) on. Can't wait for those DNA test results!
Perhaps the closer the celestial body is, the more accurate the measurements are hence there might be olders starts that we can see but we are not aware of their age.
My first thoughts aswell, doesn't make, means there's calculations are way of on either the age of the universe or the age of the star, or our universe is filled with these older than universe stars, as if we have one 190 lightyears away, we should have alot of them in the universe.
There are billions of galaxies and even more stars, I think it's safe to say there could easily be older stars than this somewhere else since we've only viewed a tiny portion of space.
Is the rate of expansion of the universe controlled in some way by gravity? If so, as things expand and move away from each other wouldn't the rate of expansion increase as things grew further away and the effects of gravity lessened?
Back in my day sonny I remember being alive when there was no light at all . I went through the great inflation uphill both ways ! ...........”Ok boomer “ is our suns response
The wisest man is the man who knows he knows nothing. The truth is, really, that nobody knows what's really going on. Not the Christians, not the Buddhists, not the scientists. Scientists break it all down, yes, but they don't know why the universe exists. Nobody knows, and nobody ever will. Maybe the truth is revealed to us when we die, maybe not. This ideology is called agnosticism
@Jack Daniels to be agnostic is to accept and decline all beliefs possible at the same time. When it comes to religion or belief, I entertain the ideas, but i don't give belief to them
How would they know it’s the oldest star in the universe when we can only see a tiny fraction of the universe? I’m amazed on what they have been able to figure out in the universe at all.
it’s probably just the oldest we’ve ever discovered, but given how it’s seemingly older than the universe it might actually be the oldest, unless things being older than the universe is proven to be a common occurrence
That's something a lot of people don't think about. What we're seeing, for one thing is thousands of years old, and if the universe is expanding constantly, depending on the rate of speed, we may never be able to see past a certain point with the technology we have right now.
about the dark matter..... he said only about 3 minutes.....in the first 5 minutes he said about the stars....and later went to age of universe and to dark matter 😑🤦♀️
@@emilio1044 It seems a pretty bad joke to be honest.. I'm trying to understand you though. Do you think it is funny that dark energy might be the explanation? why? Do you think scientists just randomly assign dark energy as the cause for different unexplained phenomena? You don't seem to have provided any evidence what so ever. Quite embarrassing for you!
@@cookergronkberg I'm not saying that Dark matter being used for such explanations that they don't understand is a joke. I'm saying that the original comment is a joke
Louis Richards you people seem to think that just because someone is a theist they are automatically incapable of contributing to scientific research and discovery. Lemaître studied theoretical physics and received his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Many examples of theists who have made great contributions to science, engineering, technology, and our understand of time and our universe/multiverse etc. If you devout yourself to deities does not make you a fool by default. If you accept deities do not exist and are a self declared atheist does not by default make you intelligent nor guarantee that you will contribute anything of importance to science. Important Contributions to sciences and theism are not mutually exclusive. As for a list of theologians who have made ground breaking contributions here you go: Isaac Newton Nicolaus Copernicus, Gregor Mendel, major contributions to our understanding of genetics. Georges Lemaître, Albertus Magnus, Roger Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, Roger Joseph Boscovich, Marin Mersenne, Bernard Bolzano, Francesco Maria Grimaldi, Nicole Oresme, Jean Buridan, Robert Grosseteste, Christopher Clavius, Nicolas Steno, Athanasius Kircher, Giovanni Battista Riccioli, William of Ockhal
@@TheRedBirdman Theories about the universe can run counter to a position in the roman catholic church. It is one thing to so happen to be catholic or raised catholic but have science and/or mythology as a discipline of interest. See Joseph Campbell one of my favorite authors. It is quite another thing to hold a theory that is counter to the church as member of its hierarchy! I still therefore contend that big bang was approved by the church beforehand. Nothing wrong with a priest who's other job is theoretical Astrophysics. But accepting his theory as gospel is similar to a Republican accepting the idea that Hunter Biden deserved that job post in the Ukraine. I really hope you get my drift.
@@allthenewsordeath5772 Point well taken! Isaac Newton seems to have had access to Spinoza's works and/or thoughts or both. Spinoza was castigated in his day as he had spoke at length to the intelligentsia of the day. They didn't accept anything he said or wrote but used it as thier own.
The weird and crazy part is how close it is to us. That's insane something that old could only be less than 200 light years away. It's actually conceivable as something that could be one day visited.
@Lee Weldon Not only that, but who’s to guarantee this star even still exists? This star could be a black or white dwarf, but due to the old light we are seeing, we’re only seeing it as it use to be, million of years ago.
@Lee Weldon Literally, read about it before you say anything. HD 140283 is moving TOWARD the Earth. That doesn't mean we can go there by any means (we will never leave our solar system), but you're wrong saying it's drifting away from us. Not that particular star.
Q: how is it older than the universe? A: scientists reduced the calculated lifetime Q: but still how does that explain how its older than the universe? A: scientists reduced the calculated lifetime more
yeah sounds shitty. they picking calculations to suit their bias instead of letting the calculations do the talking itself. That oxygen part is very cherry picky
@@TuranciHareket then provide a different model, not just assumptions. After all, the most plausible answer is that we did mistakes calculating the age of the universe. Occam's razor.
what was w/ all the white circles in the vid?? like what is that supposed to symbolize? it was just distracting and annoying and didn't even make sense
![“อาร์ต พศุตม์” เกือบเอี่ยวทุกคดีดัง เอ๊ะไว้ก่อน ไม่มีอะไรได้มาง่ายๆ | แฉ 16 ต.ค. 67 [2/3] | GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0Gx-0-kUBv8/mqdefault.jpg)
this is the longest way i've ever heard someone say "idk"
😂😂🤣🤣😆
Ha ha ha true....😁 I have to agree they are theorizing. Guessing. 💖
I was 1:31 into the video when I read your post. Stopped watching right there. Thanks for heads up!
@I C if we know one thing that is we know nothing so do we know or we do not it's kinda confusing
And the most seizure inducing
Let's appreciate the cameraman who risked his life trying to shoot all these
traveling from outerspace
😂
Bruhhh
5,000 subscribers with inly one video r/wooooosh he was obviously kidding you can't get that from google earth
@@ezeckk2650 i would want to see the universe in google earth lol
- Gacha Raze - r/overused
That’s like saying, meet the child who is older than his grandfather.
Well it is possible said child was exempt from aging for a time
Thanks to relativity, this is actually possible
You must believe that Space came first Hun..
Fry?
Briar Walker but that makes it impossible.
This man's ability to turn a one-sentence comment into a 10-minute presentation is kinda epic, honestly.
agreed
but What If is better
This is the most gripping story about not really knowing what's going on.
Where exactly are we? :P
@MATT S Ok must be just that simple ;)
It only sounds epic if You ignore all the ridiculous things hes saying. Lol he is even searching wikipedia oh snap it's all nonsense. Dark energy, mysterious forces, special hidden particles that have been hidden for billions of years. They wonder why people believe in flat earth seems more plausible than material older than both space and Time. This guy is so crazy you would assume expansion faster at one point
ikr
@@alejandromagnobarrasa9244 But he's going to "continue monitoring" ALL of "science" for us! *infinite facepalms*
"Oldest star in the universe"
"Can we observe the whole universe?"
"No"
r/whoosh
shane clyde no
And it happens to b 190ly from earth
Fake star made by aliens to appear older than it is. “Like forging a famous painting.”
By the definitions we've given observe and universe; yes. That's why it's called the observable universe.
The only rational scientific explanation is:
Human error 404
okay, scientist Fredo - what do you know that these brilliant scientists don't? Science will always correct itself if/when new data is discovered. As it stands now, the only error is that other data about this vast universe are yet unknown to us - that's not "error". Today's amazing scientific methods are only recently available as we continue to send out probes that gather data otherwise unknown to us. So, is that really surprising?
@@dnicke we know that these scientists are dumbases but they dont know that🤫
@@tega588 What? the back seat wannabe scientists? I'm confident the legitimate scientists currently working on all the research of the universe are doing the best possible job ANYONE can do. As time goes on, they always make more discoveries or invent better ways for obtaining data and completing studies. But anyone criticizing the current science - the same science which has already brought us so incredibly far - is nothing but a backward blowjob. If anyone here thinks they can do better - good luck!
:P
@@dnicke it's a joke dummy XD
Don't be so serious.
Yes, some people already stated this but I also think that our "local universe" is only a small part of the entire universe, and our big bang only contained the matter that it gathered prior to exploding. It's highly likely that there were other stars and matter that were in the process of being sucked in when the ball reached critical mass and exploded outward. Other stars may have been heading towards us and continued that way even while the local universe expanded and spread outward. I think gravity sucked in space, which is why the universe is now "expanding" as it is simply "unstretching" back to the way it was before gravity sucked everything into the middle where the big bang happened. Other big bangs are happening now in other parts of the non-local universe, and likely have been doing so for trillions of years. Eventually parts of other local big bangs will spread out and reach the gravitational pull of ours, and parts of ours will reach others and become part of the next big bang in a different part of space. There most likely are wandering stars and planets from all over the universe that travel across the universe at any time.
That's like... milkdromeda*9 marioplexes. Higgs' disruption would be dwarfed in comparison to The Cold Spot happening again. Wait a second, is Rick and Morty just them travelling their own non-local universe? It's like a local universe is a city and a non-local universe is a state, while Rick is on a state tour with his grandson Morty... or maybe I'm looking into how reality coincides with fiction too much.
Strangely enough, our thinking pretty much align. Of course, we may not have any evidence of this yet. But it feels like common sense.
What do you mean, "local universe?"
@@BambinaSaldana we are not alone? It's call *observable* universe for a reason. I would say outerverse but that wouldn't make sense either since we are just a jumble of what there is beyond this universe.
@@change.mp4 Ohh, ok.
This star is a remnant of a previous universe. Let’s call this star Galactus.
Bullshit
@@rawrwata5289 I did not hit her
Snafubar o hi mark
Or its the white hole source of the big bang. :p
The devourer of worlds!
Ridddle: "Everything changed dramatically when-"
Me, whispering: "-the fire nation attacked"
Glad I wasn't the only one.
Wow, this comment would get a reddit award, I love the creativity
Only the Avatar, Master of all four elements could stop them...
Me: Hears young sexually confused girl say, "I'm the Avatar and you've gotta deal with it."
Me again: [Pukes in mouth]
Hahaha💜💜💜💜
"Reality is an illusion!"
"The universe is a hologram!"
"Buy gold!"
--- Bill Cipher
You forgot to say bye
YOU FORGOT THE BYE PART
Your a man of culture I see
Smart Naran I think you liked your own comment
gold is not a sensible investment mister
Plot twist: That star accidentally came from a universe older then ours.
Possible... everything is possible in space
Queen Elizabeth: I found my old toy after all these years
good one, have my like
🤣
Lol
Wow cool 😎
.,,.
By my calculations the universe is 43 years old. Everything revolves around me.
then the universe is not going in the creator's favor, bad to be as old as the universe but still a virgin
@@coomercommander2554 can't u take a joke kid
Aurthur Dent would disagree. It's 42, you might have made a rounding error. It happens with bypass construction.
Is this why i'm only 37 years old?
So the universe legal?
"A son 6 years older than his father".
@Jerry X you are laughing, but its real... real in "dont be a menace" 🤣👍🏼
Sounds like alabama
It happens in comics...Cyclops and Cable
it happened in Interstellar
Lol nice
Imagine the stories this star could tell if it spoke
What's even scarier is that this star is not simply appearing older than the Universe but also hasn't reached its red giant form, so nobody knows how long it will last.
The creators of the universe : bro we need to update this damn game . Just imagine we are a game and it been 13 months for the creators so we are getting updates every second
Not every star turns into a red giant, different kinds of stars do different things, just like ours (the sun) will never super nova. It does become a red giant though.
@@sktizo twice!
thankfully i've reached my red giant form several times
@Nathen Hubbard So forever?
Correction: Oldest star in the "known" universe.
Yes, that's the point
@@user-ey8mj4tv2p then it should say that...
exactly
Yes, it can be a star either flung from a different universe, or our universe's force can have captured it from a universe that is older than ours
@@questionunplugged1814 would that not be an oxymoron? (Uni)verse... Uni equals one
Food for thought: What if the big bang was actually just a supernova in a much, much larger universe.
@Prathmesh Satote actually you're not far off XD
So you believe a bigger universe had I giant fart and we were created hmmm
Seems legit
@@CharlieOsoo learn your grammer and go back to school lmao
@@s1lentwra1th-69 Okay.
Ahem: Slimemaster561, shut the hell up your mouth.
@@s1lentwra1th-69 grammar*
before you correct his grammar which is meant as a joke, fix your own first.
My best theory for this is: Scientists have already calculated the rough age of the universe. That means several billion years ago, before the big bang, there was something before our universe. What if this star is somehow remnants of a previous universe that collapsed on itself?
Even though there is an extremely slim chance that this can happen, I think it might be possible!
@@shubhnamdeo2865 Yeah
So the thing about the big bang, it was the start of space and time. Before it, there was no space for anything to exist. And there was no change at all. Everything that exists now was packed together in a tiny pinprick of space. So no, even if somehow a previous universe had existed and collapsed, it would have destroyed everything in the process. This star is almost certainly younger than the universe and its just an accuracy problem, barring anything crazy going on. During the absolute beginning of our universe, we also know atoms didnt exist. So theres no way your theory could work.
Maybe the universe is actually very young and it’s hiding it’s true age so it can still get into clubs.
bruh
smart
big brain
Big PP
Ye its big brain time
"Scientist were shocked, but then, further calculations were made, however, these calculations proved that this was that, therefore, they began to understand, but then, it turned out that that was this, and then physicist believed that that was responsible for this, however, this makes no sense, because based on past results scientist have proven this was that, furthermore, we insert as many transitional words as possible, and we've determined that we don't actually know the age of the star."
All we have is theory...Theories offer no definitive proof...Really good guess or assumption is how they should be described, but that would discredit scientists and their massive egos.
Lol, spot on.. spot on..
Cool observation about this video, made better by @OCD... giving you a serious reply. 😁
@@rosieporgie "Theories offer no definitive proof" No shit Sherlock, that's not how a scientific theory is used. And that was quite quick for completely discrediting an entire theory just from a video instead of first doing some simple fact checking. If you fact checked their figure of the second time we approximated the age of the star you would've realized the video missed a very big part of the approximation. The error rate is + or - 800 million years. Which makes it barely within the realm of possibility with what we currently know. Which isn't a big deal if it's still wrong. There is still much to learn about star formation and star aging. Further showing the absurdity in your comment, which is quite ironic at the ending. To try to say since we do not know the age of this star, the rest of the theory is wrong, is absurd. Especially if you know what a scientific theory is, which I doubt you know.
A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. It's almost like theories are based on our current understanding via facts available...oh wait. It's almost like they are designed to changed when proven to be wrong and occasional get minor updates.
They could have structured the video a bit better yes
TH-cam: Unlocking the secrets of the universe
School: the yellow one is a star
The thing is, TH-cam doesn't show the actual maths and computer work behind all this which is TBH Boring. So even though school is boring, you will get to know all these things much more comprehensively and correctly.
Schools all over the world can and should improve the method of delivering information though.
Nonsense
@@vatsalyasharan4202 watch PBS spacetime then
@@sobtrax1846 Even PBS Space-Time doesn't delve into the actual Maths, and I have watched 30+ episodes atleast of PBS Space-Time to tell you this.
@@vatsalyasharan4202 obviously you havent because he does.
Woooooow I LOVED THE ENERGY YOUR VIDEO HAD AND ALL THE KNOWLEDGE ADDED TOGETHER, YOU CREATED THE BEST MOST EASY TO COMPREHEND VIDEO IVE EVER SEEN,WOW IM LOVING YOUR WORK!PLEASE CONTINUE AND BRING MANY MORE VIDEOS JUST LIKE THIS 1
Scientists: wait, that star is older than the universe??
Queen Elizabeth: *Always has been*
*Always has been* 🔫
Ehehe
Yeah adrenocrome is one hell of a drug
What does this has to do with her
copped
No one:
Literally no one:
Not even Big Bang it self:
Methuselah: fiRsT!!!
Yo, that needs 69k likes RIGHT NOW!
@@ninjatabg5588 yeah!
@@ninjatabg5588 ok zoomer
This'd be hella funny with an actual setup instead of "nO oNE"
Big bang: no one cares if you're the first
This is Guiness World Record of LONGEST VERSION OF "IM NOT SURE"
They need to make video more than 10 so they can fit ads
@Doroteo Matthew lmao education but then say not sure like many people know their bs they do
Well being honest we’re not sure of any of this. It’s essentially theory, that’s built on a theory, that built on a theory. The human race is basically grasping for straws when it comes to the cosmos. Not discounting these theories, just saying we as humans have become a big arrogant. I love the line form the Avengers movies, “your only a genius on earth”. I know it’s from a movie but when you think about it, you realize that it’s very hard to depict what happened before humans beings invented the written language. So imagine trying to to understand what happened billions of years ago. Of the human race survives long enough I imagine some of these theories will turn out to be bullshit, while others prove to be at least in the ball park of the actual truth. But if what we think we know is correct, we’ll probably be extinct before we actually get to the truth. If we’re going by the time clock the theories give us, the earth is due for another extinction type event any year now.
That’s all science is , it’s a bunch of logical guesses based on theories. They make it up as they go 🤣 they really don’t know shit 🤣🤣
@@BabyJoker255 Just say you don't understand science and move along
This whole video felt like an April 1st fever dream
*sees title*
“Wait, thats illegal”
Haha big bang haha how
@Dr ROLFCOPTER! No such thing as big bang, it's just a made up fairy tale. Also, there's no proof that Earth is more than 10k years old.
Killumination well there is... we know how fast certain processes take place... therefore we know how long it takes to get certain products of those processes (like ores, certain types of stones etc.) some of these processes take millions of years therefore we have an estimate of how old the Earth is minimally. (Spoiler its way older than 10k years, and I hope you where joking, can already see the 8 year old normies replying with r/woooosh)
Space is a figment of nasa's imagination they feed you paintings and cgi photocompersit pictures. And petrified wood as moon rocks. This 8 year old has done his research do you think it's about time you did.
@@dogood8095 wait everything in this video was cgi?
I feel like this video is deliberately trying to give me a seizure
Lol. Haha
Natural selection ψ(｀∇´)ψ
sTx superkill yeah that’s makes literally no sense, don’t forget the lube when they tell you to bend over. Hahaha
Sarah it’s an inside joke pertaining to the men who rap3 children at the DoD who run organized gang stalking. Crazy huh! Like mental disorders or what..? Haha
F
"It's probably just a glitch dude I wouldn't worry about it" - Sgt. Sizzles
They installed the Earth DLC before the Big Bang DLC don't worry it happens to everyone
Maybe its from a another universe lol and gliched to this universe
@Creative Destruction - Moments And Clutches way too fucking expensive. the universe is made by EA.
anyone here bought the technology DLC expansion pack?
I have a small theory. What if the big bang wasn't the beginning, but a reset. Mabey the big bang happened because a previous universe was too old and so expanded rapidly causing a explosion like how stars explode and Die. But then this star had survived the big bang reset and now exists as a last piece of the old universe.
Don't be confused
Maybe higher dimension had a mistake creating this simulation
They'll update it on later versions
The simulation theory was seal year and year ago
the simulation theory is gay
@@emeraldtheprotogen523 ok
I think they stopped patching it after update 1.43.
Ok thanks for saying tat
Normal physics: WHY CANT YOU BE NORMAL!
Quantum physics: *SCREAMING*
And isn't screaming at the same time
Quantum Physics: *IN A SUPERPOSITION OF BOTH SCREAMING AND NOT SCREAMING*
@@HailNeatoBurrito
now that's a power move right there
*only intelligent people can understand jokes in rick and Morty*
🔭😀
This just proves that we don’t REALLY know a damn thing either way.
And that's a big thing to know :-)
It's all theoretical science. We still can't get a perfect weather report for the weekend here on earth. lol
@@geraldeh7291 yep. Its all hyphotesis which they even claimed that they did come calculation error about the universe age for the past 20 years. Thats why FE believers appear like a mushroom. 😂
No it just proves this channel is full of shit. It took me like 10 seconds to look it up on Wikipedia and see that our estimates both for the age of this star and for the age of the universe have a range of uncertainty, and it's only by ignoring this range that someone would claim the star was older.
@M 40 mmmm not really a singularity if not all matter made it to the party... Like what, Methuselah's just gonna wait outside while everything condenses into a singular point of everything and then stays chilling when they all burst back out onto the lawn?
this video is the best thing at saying something and gives absolutely no reasoning or details whatsoever. it’s literally just oh they thought this then this then this with little to no input ever
A gentleman never asks a star’s age.
I have your profile photo as my home screen wallpaper
@@tarekaldghlawi6090 unsplash
If she's old enough, shouldn't be a problem :)
@@jonasjonaitis-cr8vx UAG under age galaxies
Lol, that was funny
That was the longest "We don't know" I've ever heard
Basically, everything we know and hear about the universe is based on assumptions and imagination. Talking about millions and billions of years, yet we argue about things that happened 2000 years ago. People are fucking delusional.
@chrisw Word! People get manipulated and brainwashed very easy, especially now, because Nasa became very good at this, after tens of years of practicing.
I basically got the same response when I asked my ex if she was cheating on me
Smooth Drops is your pfp a fucking diagram of flat earth
@@nivuu3553 No, it's a representation of the earth according to the Bible.
"The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us"
Neil deGrasse Tyson
John Hill sigma
its our job to understand it.
But it could be nice and give us a few more hints. We've been trying to understand for soooooooo long now. :)
Top 10 most stupid quotes in existence
not what he meant
maybe just maybe the star traveled from a older universe
“Scientist made even more calculations, it turns out-“
Ad: smoking can cause consequences.
When did we need scientists to figure out that smoking can cause consequences.
Or it can be said as well as: subsribe for-
Ad: download raid shadow legends
Some decades ago
well placed ads are the best
"It turned out- arrgghhgggh(zombie sounds)
I got an add about Nike shoes
Scientists: wtf is going on here
Methuselah: lmao
Lmao
Lmao
Lmao
Lmao
lamo
Anyone else wish they could live forever just to know the answers to all of are greatest questions we have now
Kind of yeah. But what you're referring to, the hunger for knowledge, is an unfillable belly, an unquenchable thirst ...
Think about it. The more you learn the more you want to learn right? From what you said though I know that you probably have a death phobia. It's a sign of high intelligence if it's any consolation.
Yeah, but by then we would turn into either phyical gods, cyborgs or bodiless consciousness (ether gods) so highly intelligent they wouldn't need to have their own planet because it could use whatever bodies and entities existing on whatever planets birth new life to possess at will. Which basically feels like it's already been done. Soooo it all depends whether you'd rather be recycled and be fluid like or reduced down to nothing on a soul/conscious level but maintain body in ai form. And you will have to take into account that as the universe ages new life is formed... you might not like the phyical body options but hey, at least you'd be conscious... then if you decide to go the god/cyborg route you run the risk of running into life as smart or smarter that might want to just end you just because...like they do now. 🤣 we have options though. As long as we have a delicate balance between tech advancement here on earth and keeping this planet from cracking like an egg.
@@briannakelly26 I’d define a god as a magic being that disobeys the laws of physics so good luck with that
@@SirArthurTheGreat 🤣 I wouldn't disagree but look at the masses that don't g.a.s about that or their supposed apocalyptic end. In their minds it is what it is. Then... there's God vs Gods/demigods with much less restriction and who don't really care for much laws in general. That would be interesting .
Yes but the problem is that you can run out of memory
The universe has been here forever. Time is relative. No one has even counted to a billion. No one has time for that.
So no one is gonna mention the clever star's name? Methuselah is the name of the guy who lived the longest in the bible. The bible says he lived 969 years.
The Bible also mentions unicorns, doesn't make it true.
@@digitalblood5388 they never said it was
There's also a tree named methuselah, it's location is secret and it is the oldest living thing on earth.
@@digitalblood5388 the bible does not mention unicorns
Don't open your third eye or take DMT, you might invite some h*rny succubi/incubi, a guy claims some "demon" busted out his cheeks against his will(rape). proof: th-cam.com/video/jthU9G5PSho/w-d-xo.html
Universe: *comes into existence*
Methuselah: *_"FIRST"_*
The comment from a LEGEND
Methuselah: *"who here at -200 million years"*
First
Maybe God has mistaken to create a star before the universe
Sean Wagner Godinez he was testing if the physics drive worked and he couldn’t delete it
Jesus christ this video was so flashy that my eyes grew brains specifically to have their own anurism.
I watched it on a 55" OLED about 4 feet from my face. I'm blind now.
@Daniel haha that's it man
ill tell you a secret, your eyes are your brain.
Haha
Sounds like fun!
Type 6 civilizations racing to put Methuselah in their galaxy museums
We're all just in someone's PlayStation
Jacob Solis this “reality” is actually just like some celestial kid’s version of GTA
Jacob Solis I'll be in the Xbox I like chatting shit with people
God’s game
We're part of The Sims.
That's dumb
“we don’t actually know its age” just add 10 minutes and ads in the middle
Trey Jackson they said 14billion
llamatitan just do the math then oof the universe is 13.8bil years old the just add 2mil
llamatitan they said it could’ve been before the Big Bang
@@Tj33372 is is sooo superior if this is true everything is wrong what smart people know about everything
Anttu Murikka yes smart people are wrong 🥰😍😍😍🥰
Universe: I am the first thing that appeared
HD: no I am
Camera man: amateurs
queen Elizabeth: am i a joke to you
@@rockrockpancake6452 your mom: am i a joke to you
@@_soggy_chips_ahoy_253 my old ass pc that took almost 1 hour to start: *Are you challenging me?*
@@youwantmyname9208 the piece of cheese in the back of the fridge: *oh youre approaching me?*
@@_soggy_chips_ahoy_253 that one drunk granma crossing the street:o kawai ko to
i hope that, when i die, my beliefs of an afterlife are true and i get to explore space freely without anything stopping me. and then maybe reincarnate when im done exploring space
I don’t think that’s going to be the case
When you don’t solve your thesis problem but the presentation has to be ten minutes long.
Hahaha gold *****
Lol
i shall learn from this for future presentations
When you have to make up excuses to fit your other calculations for how old something is but really don’t know lol
EXACTLY!
Universe: I'm 13.8 billion years old
Methuselah: I'm 14 billion years old
Universe: ok boomer
It's a wibbly wobbly timey whimey thing.
🤣🤣🤣
Kenoscope lol
ok big boomer
😂
*Scientists: The Universe is 13.8 billion years old*
Methuselah: I'm bout to end this man's whole career
dark Shaman ok got you
@@darkshaman7087 I think time might exist weather or not humans came up with it
@@darkshaman7087 I think time might have to do with when it gets light and dark outside
@@darkshaman7087 it still existed before we called it dark and night 😂😂😂 same as how time still existed before we called it time. Don't think we made it exist if we just gave it a name
@@darkshaman7087 oh yeah but maybe it was meant to be called time and dark and night so it always was time and dark and night lol
Man, I heard “older than the universe” and I was expecting this thing to be named the Eye.
くႿ N
Scientists: This star is older than the universe
Everyone: *Wait. That's illegal.*
Lol 😂 now I’m questioning if their is super powers that can be controlled like the dark energy what about light it’s that a sun 🌞? Lol
*Seems legit*
Maybe it’s friends with Trump, so laws don’t apply to it.
@@HippieMumboJumbo XD
HippieMumboJumbo or any politician 😂
12 year old alien: shit I forgot to delete that last part before I started the game over.
Common saying with me: God. Much more reasonable than a kid alien now huh
He started the new game+
Eat your cereal
@@bleachwolf6936 no
@@dickjerm Heresy! Jeebus done did it!!!
Whose watching during the covid19 lock down and trying to solve the mysteries of the cosmos
Haha yup
Lol me
Maybe we should solve the mystery of covid 19 first..and that would be definitely great
Stephen Miller For me it’s the best way to ride it out
Shit is crazy right.. 👀
This proves my theory that Universe has always existed.
Editor: "So how many effects and transitions do you want in the video?"
Ridddle: "YES"
LOL
HYYYYLarious!!
Can't even watch it hardly lol
@@codyellsworth7927 Yeah. it's really distracting.
Lol well done, though.
We’re all in a jar, on a shelf, that a alien kid made as a project and got a -d
LMAO
nice imagination! 😄
D- 😂😂😂
an*
The odds of us living in a simulation is 5%
"scientists tried"
"scientists did"
"scientists were"
... SOURCES PLEASE?
This
Google
@@MeadowBrook2000 lol are you telling me to Google for sources or that the source is Google? I can certainly Google the information on this but I'm not the one posting a video on the subject and claiming "scientists say". And obviously Google is not a source so, thanks?
@@JustinLMcPherson Bro! Bro bro bro... Stop bitching around because these are not news anymore, It spawns all over internet
@@JustinLMcPherson Take It the Arxiv for example, there is AT LEAST two papers talking about
Meanwhile the oldest star : Get some popcorn let me watch my own birth !
It's like finding out that child is actually older than mother.
Lmao
Alabama be like
@@reecewest9495 😂😂😂😂
ALES KATIČ no. It’s like finding out your wife is a man. This is all cgi cartoons. They’re faking space travel.
Nigga
Riddle: how many special effects should we fit in this video?
Editor: YES
r/whoosh
I’m here for these comments
@@shaneclyde8694 you didn't even spell it right, come on man
Methuselah: Universe I am your father
Universe : No No Nooooooo!
That’s not true, that’s Impossible
PRASANNA XTREO you can't really say anything though avenger fanboy, punished and daredevil was better than avengers
Metamorphical speaking you are saying the universe replied noooooo qhen Maury said the DNA test are in. In the case of methuselah, Universe, you are the father! But in this case science has to pay support. Big bang concocted by a priest is the lie told on Maury. Next week we will have Mary, Joseph and Yeshua (Jesus) on. Can't wait for those DNA test results!
xDDD
I spotted a star that is a billion trillion years older than the known universe.
I win!
"Perplexed the entire world." Ah that explains that time I was perplexed without knowing why I was perplexed.
Michael L Walker lmao best comment
😂
Quality 😂
Lol
Lmaaoooo
0:00 when Elon introduces his son to the world
Underrated
😂😂😂😂
Too underrated
@@johnnybravo4733 yeah most underrated
🤣
Of all the stars in the whole vast universe, the oldest one is Just 190 Light years away? Practically next door. What are the odds?
Perhaps the closer the celestial body is, the more accurate the measurements are hence there might be olders starts that we can see but we are not aware of their age.
My first thoughts aswell, doesn't make, means there's calculations are way of on either the age of the universe or the age of the star, or our universe is filled with these older than universe stars, as if we have one 190 lightyears away, we should have alot of them in the universe.
There are billions of galaxies and even more stars, I think it's safe to say there could easily be older stars than this somewhere else since we've only viewed a tiny portion of space.
@@markulous08 that's my dad's name! But yeah, what you said.
like most of our other "science" it's wrong.
Is the rate of expansion of the universe controlled in some way by gravity? If so, as things expand and move away from each other wouldn't the rate of expansion increase as things grew further away and the effects of gravity lessened?
Milky way: I so fuckin old
Universe: i am older than you, you're also literally inside me.
HD 140283: you're both adorable
Just say meth-a-lusa
Did you know that technically scientists calculator that we are one of the
Do you know that scientists have calculated that the Milky Way is one of the youngest galaxies in the known universe
@@codymalone2712 o
@@codymalone2712 Yeah👀
Let’s just hope that star doesn’t tell us about back in its day
Angel Valdez ok starmer
I already love this reply section.
Back in my day, we didn’t have time and space. We had to make our own.
Back in my day I was playing chess with God and queen elizabeth
Back in my day sonny I remember being alive when there was no light at all . I went through the great inflation uphill both ways ! ...........”Ok boomer “ is our suns response
What I learned in this video: the more scientists learn, the less we all know.
In some ways, it really is somehow comforting.
Yes, that's good, the more we learn, the more we realize what we don't know.
Oh my God that is such a great quote man, trade mark it
The wisest man is the man who knows he knows nothing.
The truth is, really, that nobody knows what's really going on. Not the Christians, not the Buddhists, not the scientists. Scientists break it all down, yes, but they don't know why the universe exists. Nobody knows, and nobody ever will. Maybe the truth is revealed to us when we die, maybe not.
This ideology is called agnosticism
@Jack Daniels to be agnostic is to accept and decline all beliefs possible at the same time. When it comes to religion or belief, I entertain the ideas, but i don't give belief to them
0:01 holy crap that's gotta be a high quality star.
How would they know it’s the oldest star in the universe when we can only see a tiny fraction of the universe? I’m amazed on what they have been able to figure out in the universe at all.
it’s probably just the oldest we’ve ever discovered, but given how it’s seemingly older than the universe it might actually be the oldest, unless things being older than the universe is proven to be a common occurrence
@@jonathanmelgar1387 not many schools teach you about space so
@@lazy4369 science my friend if they don’t you probably live somewhere out of the United States
@@Era-ey4de yes I do, Might here as well but study, not the average high school
They can't see the whole universe but can tell that it is expanding. So, they used this knowledge to estimate the age.
The whole video:
"This happened"
"No it didn't"
"But this happened"
"I'm just kidding"
"This definitely happened"
"No, I'm not sure it happened"
L😂L
Cringe
Kushal Mukkati lmao
EXACLTY
Eat your cereal
Universe: lol noobs I’m so old
HD 140283: laughs in star
Black hole that loves old stars: hehe star go stretch
Queen Elizabeth the 2nd : laughs in immortality
@@Clairbourn3 LMFAOO
Wueyehhxxbdjrurirudhfchxgxudycucuxxhxhfhfhcbbdhchdbfhjshehsqppqdidufhehfhfydhtbrjrituowosamamznxbcbcbsjwie
Bro thats actualy accurate use of noob word xD
Kudos to the camera man taking shots and bringing it back for us to watch it.
It was from another universe
Prob yes, we have a limit of vision and only understand what happens inside of it, not what happens outside.
@ismail Cem Eroglu what? Thats not how multiverse works lol
Maybe it gone rouge before the universe began forming
@@Li-anne0 again, thats not how multiverse works, and how does a star form out of nothing?
@ismail Cem Eroglu spill of materials into the void? bruh
I've read somewhere that the expansion of the universe is constantly accelerating, so the universe may be much, much older than we thought.
Mind opener
Science
Scientists think they know a lot, we cant even begin to imagine the true physics of the universe
Cody Culp yea
That's something a lot of people don't think about. What we're seeing, for one thing is thousands of years old, and if the universe is expanding constantly, depending on the rate of speed, we may never be able to see past a certain point with the technology we have right now.
I've never heard someone take 10 minutes to literally say "Idk. Dark energy?"
LOL pointless video no disrespect to Riddle
about the dark matter..... he said only about 3 minutes.....in the first 5 minutes he said about the stars....and later went to age of universe and to dark matter 😑🤦♀️
yeah like he is just mumbling around, i dont see his point 3 minutes in the video
underrated
Yeah they use fillers bc they are trying to reach the 10 minute watch time for ad revenue
me when doing math in school: i suck
me when playing call of duty while i have to figure out things:
Everytime scientists can’t explain something: Dark energy
Not really. Maybe to someone who hasn't studied science.
@@cookergronkberg it's a joke
@@emilio1044 It seems a pretty bad joke to be honest.. I'm trying to understand you though. Do you think it is funny that dark energy might be the explanation? why? Do you think scientists just randomly assign dark energy as the cause for different unexplained phenomena? You don't seem to have provided any evidence what so ever. Quite embarrassing for you!
@@cookergronkberg I'm not saying that Dark matter being used for such explanations that they don't understand is a joke. I'm saying that the original comment is a joke
Or black holes.
Methuselah: shines dimly ...
Astronomers: EVERYTHING WE KNOW MUST BE A LIE !!
Not true about everything. Now a priest introducing the big bang concept is the first step towards mass insanity. This is true.
Louis Richards you people seem to think that just because someone is a theist they are automatically incapable of contributing to scientific research and discovery. Lemaître studied theoretical physics and received his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Many examples of theists who have made great contributions to science, engineering, technology, and our understand of time and our universe/multiverse etc. If you devout yourself to deities does not make you a fool by default. If you accept deities do not exist and are a self declared atheist does not by default make you intelligent nor guarantee that you will contribute anything of importance to science. Important Contributions to sciences and theism are not mutually exclusive.
As for a list of theologians who have made ground breaking contributions here you go:
Isaac Newton
Nicolaus Copernicus,
Gregor Mendel, major contributions to our understanding of genetics.
Georges Lemaître,
Albertus Magnus,
Roger Bacon,
Pierre Gassendi,
Roger Joseph Boscovich,
Marin Mersenne,
Bernard Bolzano,
Francesco Maria Grimaldi,
Nicole Oresme,
Jean Buridan,
Robert Grosseteste,
Christopher Clavius,
Nicolas Steno,
Athanasius Kircher,
Giovanni Battista Riccioli,
William of Ockhal
Chicken Farmer
To be fair Isaac newton was a gnostic, which in my opinion is even worse than Presbyterians.
@@TheRedBirdman Theories about the universe can run counter to a position in the roman catholic church. It is one thing to so happen to be catholic or raised catholic but have science and/or mythology as a discipline of interest. See Joseph Campbell one of my favorite authors. It is quite another thing to hold a theory that is counter to the church as member of its hierarchy! I still therefore contend that big bang was approved by the church beforehand. Nothing wrong with a priest who's other job is theoretical Astrophysics. But accepting his theory as gospel is similar to a Republican accepting the idea that Hunter Biden deserved that job post in the Ukraine. I really hope you get my drift.
@@allthenewsordeath5772 Point well taken! Isaac Newton seems to have had access to Spinoza's works and/or thoughts or both. Spinoza was castigated in his day as he had spoke at length to the intelligentsia of the day. They didn't accept anything he said or wrote but used it as thier own.
That’s like saying I’m older than my parents
Umm... no.
edit: OH ok I get it now. I must've misunderstood it.
Yeah, ita posible in the wisdom of atronomers. The are stuck in their theories and knowlegde.
A time traveller maybe had done that on purpose to confuse us
Imtiaz Kabir wait what if someone in the future created the Big Bang?
what if you're somewhere in your 30s, and your early 50s dad married a 19-20 year old woman?
That moment when your soul is older than Methuselah
All these numbers will be different in ten years.
Stfu u just put me threw a mid life crisis. Im 16 breh
Yeah there will be 10 years added to them making them different....
@Reni "Ugh, I totally am 16 years old and im suffering life crisis, depression, anxiety..Ugh being a teenager is so hard!"
@@siulseven1096 being a teen low key is hard tho
Cause of puberty and ur body needed extra food and sleep
Reni no spoiled kids these days are just
What should I say
Spoiled
When the main character is just as smart as the villain.
that makes eternity
When ure takin whole caleb titles as jokes that doesn't even make sense
🐐
シItachi fr
I can't even guess a person's age from 20ft away
Sure you can. You might be 20 years off. But in the grand scheme of things you were close enough. It was a human.. (maybe) 🤣
Meow
Yeah the universe may be 10001010 billion years old and they act like tbey can tell the age of wverything by smelling it lmao
El Ka no.
id guess below 100
plot twist: the guy that wrote down the age of the stars accidentally wrote billion instead of million
The weird and crazy part is how close it is to us. That's insane something that old could only be less than 200 light years away. It's actually conceivable as something that could be one day visited.
I'm shook.
@Lee Weldon Not only that, but who’s to guarantee this star even still exists? This star could be a black or white dwarf, but due to the old light we are seeing, we’re only seeing it as it use to be, million of years ago.
@@lisatryme3518 Lisa it’s under 200 light years away meaning what we seeing is only under 200 years ago
@Lee Weldon Literally, read about it before you say anything. HD 140283 is moving TOWARD the Earth. That doesn't mean we can go there by any means (we will never leave our solar system), but you're wrong saying it's drifting away from us. Not that particular star.
I am not saying this to be crude or anything but I really doubt humanity will even exist then.
Q: how is it older than the universe?
A: scientists reduced the calculated lifetime
Q: but still how does that explain how its older than the universe?
A: scientists reduced the calculated lifetime more
If you believe that spacetime is fundamental that you will try everything to keep your believe on track.
it just means the universe is the age of the star
yeah sounds shitty. they picking calculations to suit their bias instead of letting the calculations do the talking itself. That oxygen part is very cherry picky
It can't be older than the universe, unless it's god, just like all the other matter in existence, which is what I think.
@@TuranciHareket then provide a different model, not just assumptions. After all, the most plausible answer is that we did mistakes calculating the age of the universe. Occam's razor.
Oh lord, the editing in this video makes me feel like I'm either high or drunk.
Why not both
@@Zyn_Shi LMAO I literally just thought of the exact same thing you just said🤣
Gonna try watch this when I’m super high. Thanks
Haaaa haaaa!! yup!. That was great.:)
what was w/ all the white circles in the vid?? like what is that supposed to symbolize? it was just distracting and annoying and didn't even make sense
What if the big bang was an old universe destroying itself to creat a new one?
This star is the oldest thing in existence.
*Elizabeth II enters the chat*
Lmfao
Its probably The Queen's natural habitat
Lstn Betty White: “What kept you, kid?”
Elizabeth III hold my non existing beer
its says star not immortal
Methuselah: im older than you so i get to play the ps4 first!
The universe: fine!
Like the comment
So true
"This comment" is older than this video
Hahahaha Omg! That's funny!
Ricardo Rodriguez bruh
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤪🤪🤪
Time to do some math XD 😂
@Spirit Winds thats very much possible
Honestly everything they say about universe shouldn't be taken for granted, its only suggestions and guessing, nothing is proven.