Great pointers there John. Good job. My order of mods for racing pro ATV mx is: 1. Width (A-arms and axle) 2. Suspension (revalve or upgrade) and 3. Motor
The extra lift of an aftermarket cam is really not going to work like it should without porting Yes you can throw a cam in but I think you're a little backwards in the order to do these upgrades It's best to do the pipe first because if you do the intake the carburetor the cam porting all that other stuff you've still left the bike choked right down by the stock pipe Yes you can take the stock baffle out of the stock pipe I didn't hear you talk about that
I totally get it’s none of our business as viewers, but are you thinking about ever linking back up with Michael Sabo?? Love those older vids of you guys battling it out on the 400’s and the other shit too. Just bummed I don’t see yall kick together anymore
One of the upgrades for the carburetor is to go to the Lectron smart carburetor there's also the SC2 which is smart carburetor too they use a metering rod instead of jets
You must not be too well versed in the dirt bike ATV world Lectron carburetors are used quite often especially people that go up and down in elevation I know a few people that run them on their banshees
@@johnbruzzi4381 a lot of people don't use them because of the very expensive price I know people that run them on banshees CR250 CR500 snowmobiles side-by-sides I probably know a 15 people at least that are using them either the SC2 or the Lectron
Unplugging the TPS does not move it to a higher ignition map or anything look it up there's a 2D and a 3D map The 2D map just uses RPM as it's base 2 advanced timing a 3D map uses RPM as well as throttle position sensor to make a 3D timing map Yes it starts a little easier with the TPS connected but I haven't had any issues running the 2D or the 3D timing map It's just important when starting it with the TPS still connected you don't hit the throttle that's what kills the starting components on these bikes I fix hundreds of bikes so trust me I know these things
I did look it up and got great information from very reputable sources. The cdi does not make its own timing map based on throttle position and rpm. These 2 maps are preset locked in and have no variation in them because theres no other information being input to the cdi for it to be able to calculate anything different based off of things like air temperature, coolant temperature and such. The only reason it starts easier is because the timing is a few degrees retarded on the 1st map otherwise this wouldnt be the case because nothing else changes. This is a common issue with 2 strokes also when advancing the timing on a plate they become harder to start because of the timing advance. It absolutely will not hurt the bike to leave the tps unplugged on a carbureted bike, it will just stay in the advanced timing map. Different story on efi but the trx was never efi from the factory. The only way you can change the ignition timing within the map is to have a programmable unit installed and make your own. Stock cdi is super basic its just 2 simple timing curves.
@@StupidFastJohn it doesn't make its own map but the position in the map that it uses the 3D map gets its inputs from the TPS and the throttle position whereas the 2D map only gets its input from crank position It's like an EFI map it can use different parts of the map depending on the inputs
@@StupidFastJohn it uses the pickup on the stator as a crank position it has to know a crank position in order to fire it's not like a crank position in a car but the pickup on the stator is what is used as a crank position sensor
The 2D table clearly has 2-dimensions, the 1st being the RPM, the second being the associated value. The limitation of this type of tuning is that the tune is static - it has no adaptability. If you are over ~66% throttle, then the DME uses this table, and it doesn't care about actual load. So, for example, if you are at 4000rpm, and 0psi of boost, your ignition timing is ~19°BTDC. And if you are at the same RPM, but 15psi of boost, your ignition is exactly the same: ~19°BTDC. Obviously the load on the motor is not the same for these two situations, so the ignition timing should be different, but it isn't.solution is to change the engine-management strategy to use 3-dimensions.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example.The added dimension should be immediately obvious. The 1st dimension is LOAD; the second dimension is RPM; the third dimension is the associated value.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example. The addition of the 3rd-axis provides much better control and adaptability to changing engine loads and rpms. The end-result is a smoother, more linear power delivery, with multiple "secondary effects" such as economy, emissions, safety, ect.
Great pointers there John. Good job. My order of mods for racing pro ATV mx is: 1. Width (A-arms and axle) 2. Suspension (revalve or upgrade) and 3. Motor
Great video brother!
Can ya make some trx content? I just bought a 05 the content on them just isn’t there all 450er stuff
cool stuff bro i wish i had a way to collaborate with you on my new project any way i could get a way to talk to you?
Can't wait to see what going on ur yfz . Im doing a yfz lt250r motor swap
Turbo blaster updates?? You cant start the project and not finish it...
Agreed
These things take time, i always circle back to them bro. Its just fine tuning now, the hard parts been done 🤙
The extra lift of an aftermarket cam is really not going to work like it should without porting Yes you can throw a cam in but I think you're a little backwards in the order to do these upgrades It's best to do the pipe first because if you do the intake the carburetor the cam porting all that other stuff you've still left the bike choked right down by the stock pipe Yes you can take the stock baffle out of the stock pipe I didn't hear you talk about that
My 05 Trx has a problem when its in high gears it feels like something is limiting it idk its super weird
Yoooo John my Trx is spitting oil from the crankcase breather hose what can it be I have no idea I’ve been asking and getting no answers
Is it overfull? If the vent on the valve cover free of dirt and debris? The crankcase air has to vent from somewhere!
Great video! Great order.
Where did those nerf bars come from?
U're quad is plenty strong an fast. I'm always on the side of more air more power
Would love to see a ltr 450 on the channel!
You wouldn’t happen do know what the stock jet sizes are?
Great video man nice quad
I totally get it’s none of our business as viewers, but are you thinking about ever linking back up with Michael Sabo?? Love those older vids of you guys battling it out on the 400’s and the other shit too. Just bummed I don’t see yall kick together anymore
thank you brother your video was very helpful
thank you man, video was helpful
Stock cdi is the best cdi period.
High compression stock bore , stage 2 cam, porting , exhaust,intake , go reliable power.
Hey bro been trying to find ya on fb lol my buddy looking for a used warrior stage 1 or 2 cam if u or Wes got one layin on the shelf lmk k
Good ol’ ass dyno!
🤙🏻
🤣
Do a smaller leak jet,
For the 05s just put on a 06+ carb
The green and pink don’t mix but sick quad tho
I agree it got me wanting to powdercoat it 😅
Green wire mod works
Cool video
One of the upgrades for the carburetor is to go to the Lectron smart carburetor there's also the SC2 which is smart carburetor too they use a metering rod instead of jets
Nobody uses that garbage
You must not be too well versed in the dirt bike ATV world Lectron carburetors are used quite often especially people that go up and down in elevation I know a few people that run them on their banshees
@@johnbruzzi4381just because you don't understand how it works or are unable to set it up correctly does not make the part junk
@@Adam-banshee-man I race xc and I Guess I'm saying that nobody is using them there.
@@johnbruzzi4381 a lot of people don't use them because of the very expensive price I know people that run them on banshees CR250 CR500 snowmobiles side-by-sides I probably know a 15 people at least that are using them either the SC2 or the Lectron
You only need 1 mod. Buy a banshee.
Unplugging the TPS does not move it to a higher ignition map or anything look it up there's a 2D and a 3D map The 2D map just uses RPM as it's base 2 advanced timing a 3D map uses RPM as well as throttle position sensor to make a 3D timing map Yes it starts a little easier with the TPS connected but I haven't had any issues running the 2D or the 3D timing map It's just important when starting it with the TPS still connected you don't hit the throttle that's what kills the starting components on these bikes I fix hundreds of bikes so trust me I know these things
I did look it up and got great information from very reputable sources. The cdi does not make its own timing map based on throttle position and rpm. These 2 maps are preset locked in and have no variation in them because theres no other information being input to the cdi for it to be able to calculate anything different based off of things like air temperature, coolant temperature and such. The only reason it starts easier is because the timing is a few degrees retarded on the 1st map otherwise this wouldnt be the case because nothing else changes. This is a common issue with 2 strokes also when advancing the timing on a plate they become harder to start because of the timing advance. It absolutely will not hurt the bike to leave the tps unplugged on a carbureted bike, it will just stay in the advanced timing map. Different story on efi but the trx was never efi from the factory. The only way you can change the ignition timing within the map is to have a programmable unit installed and make your own. Stock cdi is super basic its just 2 simple timing curves.
@@StupidFastJohn it doesn't make its own map but the position in the map that it uses the 3D map gets its inputs from the TPS and the throttle position whereas the 2D map only gets its input from crank position It's like an EFI map it can use different parts of the map depending on the inputs
@@MrATOMBOMB420 these dont have a crank position sensor.
@@StupidFastJohn it uses the pickup on the stator as a crank position it has to know a crank position in order to fire it's not like a crank position in a car but the pickup on the stator is what is used as a crank position sensor
The 2D table clearly has 2-dimensions, the 1st being the RPM, the second being the associated value. The limitation of this type of tuning is that the tune is static - it has no adaptability. If you are over ~66% throttle, then the DME uses this table, and it doesn't care about actual load. So, for example, if you are at 4000rpm, and 0psi of boost, your ignition timing is ~19°BTDC. And if you are at the same RPM, but 15psi of boost, your ignition is exactly the same: ~19°BTDC. Obviously the load on the motor is not the same for these two situations, so the ignition timing should be different, but it isn't.solution is to change the engine-management strategy to use 3-dimensions.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example.The added dimension should be immediately obvious. The 1st dimension is LOAD; the second dimension is RPM; the third dimension is the associated value.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example.
The addition of the 3rd-axis provides much better control and adaptability to changing engine loads and rpms. The end-result is a smoother, more linear power delivery, with multiple "secondary effects" such as economy, emissions, safety, ect.
👍🏾🤘🏾
🤙
Dude just pull the hood. Show the people.
What about alcohol
To drink?
@@johnbruzzi4381 to burn as in methanol