Sachin pilot Rahul Gandhi Varun Gandhi Sasi tharur Kapil sibal DK Shivkumar Revand Reddy Priyanka Gandhi Jairam Ramesh.... Great mindedness.. Great personality. No hate speech... humanly gentle man. Love to see them rulling India 🎉🎉❤ Listening to their interviews always been a joy.. inclusive politics.. ❤
Lot of debates like this should be conducted throughout the country regarding established independent National judicial academy appointment should be transparent merit on basis from lower court to apex court 2) new courts establishment on population ratio 3) discover easy way to common man go to higher courts or facilitate technology to the rural area people filing cases in higher courts 4) court experience must be considered in appointing judicial posts even for small courts also 5) in all court premises lawyers chambers must be established
Meaningful discussion . In case of appointment of judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, there must be full time Independent Committee free from incumbent executives ,incumbent justices and political parties. In the matter of post retirement assignment of judges there must be cooling off period of atleast 5 yrs. .
Excellent programme and very intellectual conversation. All of you are doing yeoman service for the Indian public. Unfortunately Honble Apex Court has delayed taking up important cases on priority like Ayodhya , section 370 and Electoral Bonds.
In 54 years of Congress rule, I wonder what Congress party might have done to Judiciary when even media was not free in those times (mainstream is not free even now), if this much harm BJP can do in just 10 years of continous rule. Democracy is a myth just as privacy is in present digital age.
Excellent💯👍👏💯👍👏 program the issues were raised are real which have the deep concerns about the future of judiciary system and in what manners it can affect the future of indian democracy
This is the assurance that we have intellectual people in India who love our country . May God use you all as a mighty instrument . Salute for this initiative.
it is so soul satisfying to watch stalwarts like themselves, discussing the fault lines and seemingly worried about it. as long as they are there we are still in the fight, to me they are the last bastion standing.
Excellent reviews and knowledge to the highest core dear Adv Kapil sibal and team.....i want this relayed on every Indian languages that common man is concetised.....come with more episodes Sir.❤😊
Since judges get benefits from govt even after retirement , they may not be allowed any post under govt . After 5 years of cooling period they go for any post under govt but after surrendering all benefits being taken by them. I m not judicial person but from audit background.
Highly objective and frank interaction among our top people. It's not only the judiciary but the bar as well that has to be fiercely independent in order to save and uphold the Rule of Law. They would have to rise above purely personal gains.
thank you sir hats off intellectual talks it is unfortunate to see some MP did not speak relevant problems concern states knowledge of subjects political parties select dynamic personalities as MP
salute to your vision and wisdom, what I could see there is no genuine views collaboration with the superior authorities of Supreme court.. It was a very impressive meeting by the Hon,able lawyers of the supreme court .May god bless them with courage to stand up for the right cause and provide the justice to save the Indian constitution ad democracy of Indi🙏🙏a
Great to listen such enlightening conversation and thanks to all advocates for conducting such show the problems in the democracy at any aspect is not always due to the systemic problems but also due to the lack of ethical values and knowledge and The end of democracy is not possible unless its citizens are satisfied with living in an undemocratic environment, hence citizens should demand free and fair institutions from their elected government as the first priority to save democracy.
Very good conversation I wish from this kind of discussions our news media could learn something Thanks to Kapil sibbal sir for initiating this Best of luck !
Great conversation.. rightly pointed out the current affairs.. This practice will kill our judiciary even if the president government is changed.. cooling period is a good option atleast
A new law is required to keep the principles of neutrality, impartiality and dignity of judiciary for function ing healthy democracy in our country. Actually it is worrisome, that our judiciary going to lost its dignity. So, God save the Supreme Court had to written by Justice F. S. Nariman.
Character building and character assessment at all levels of education and proper evaluation and using proper weightage for future career is something which we totallly lack at primary levels.
I absolutely agree with whatever they're saying. But when I heard sibal say the government shall not have any say in the appointment of judges... It was a 1000 deaths of Irony.
I believe that in the arena of politico-legal conglomerations at the highest levels there shall be some high level blue eyed legal fraternity in each Political Party favouring each other. And there would be no surprise that such high level judicial level quid pro quo connections prevail in the Congress Party also. Such a discussion of that nature may also be telecasted please, if any.
I believe the collegium, bar councils, and civil society should have discussions and set a high bar of both morality and submission to the Constitution along with yearly transparent service review based on the judgments decided, withheld or kept pending/reserved for weeks and months.
This discussion must be on the TV. Any Judge who joins party in one year after retiring must go to jail, this guys are not true judge, but cannot given this type of judges
These eminent advocates should also talk about the huge number of pending cases and everlasting resolution. Because of this delay in judicial process we have totally lost the confidence in judiciary as it gives preference to the cases of elites and rich people.
Nothing shall happen. We cannot change the direction that the entire profession of law has taken. Our British Rulers politically united us and brought a system of law with which they were familiar. Without delving into their motives, we must acknowledge that they were successful in implementing what they thought good for maintaining the law and order. It would be obvious that they did not take up the task tinkering with the law based on custom . They did try to make uniform civil code. But they maintained the system of law and order to highest degree they could. They did not interfere with normal courts except in the cases when they were threatened with ouster. They appointed persons of moral integrity lest people may not go against them. The constitution of India is based upon the laws made by the British. We could not maintain the same respect for law by persons administering it because we are divided by religion,caste,community, race etc. Gradually we have reduced our constitution as a source power rather than an outline for governance of the vast country of so many divisions . Power rules us all and we do not care for poor and downtrodden because of their birth in poor family. Judges too are power hungry and they want to maintain it as ong as possible.
Wow what a wonderfully enlightening discussion. This current saffron sanghi savarkar mentality wave has taken Indian discourse/debate/discussions back to the stone age apes. Glad to see that still there is some sense prevailing.
Considering Mr Dave's opening remarks..why wud POLITICAL paties entertain any judge in the first place unless they give biased judgement in favour of the political parties
Good discussions, analysis and opinions. With what little knowledge I have about politics and judiciary, l feel the discussion would have been better if you had included two other personalities of different features, this team is a group of birds with the same feature which will naturally flock together. Hope you do this in your next discussion, to make it more fruitful.
All India judicial exam should be conducted where directly district judge should be selected.only those judges should be promoted to be elligible for high court and Supreme Court judge.merit should prevail
Discussion was started with former justice of Calcutta High Court, Gangopadhyaya; resigning and within 48 hours joining the ruling party: Can we say it is like Campus Recruitment
Meenakshi nailed the fundamental issue. We have become a value-degraded society - a self-centric society, and so everything is up for grabs in the name of being 'successful'. The rot has to change right from our homes and school. We need to inspire our young minds to be fearless and push for values one cherishes as opposed to being cowered in fear all the time.
just because judgment is not in your favor it cannot be construed as biased and quid pro quo ...this notion iteslf compromises independence of judiciary.
Apart from the criteria of eligibility, as a concern citizen, i think the best way forward are: to ban judges from any post retirement office including rajya sabha seat, independent judicial committee to review the performance of judges of SC as well as HC before appointed him as a judge, and remove the law minister from the collegium system..
In Rajasthan many judges have been attending the functions of the legal department of बीजेपी. Akhil bhartiya अधिवक्ता parishad. Legal department of congress has never invited the judges in it's functions as it would be very unfair to the judges.
This development is expected since of late the top court has observed ( recent TAMILNADU CASE )that being a sympathizer of a political party is not a disqualification for the post of judgeship. Please remember today's politics is not the one we saw in 60's.
Nobody , neither Government nor Judiciary and section of lawyers are least bothered about the reform of the judiciary system. In the present judiciary system the people do not get right justice in right time. In the present judiciary system the people are suffering serious hardships during the time of proceedings of the case in the court hopelessly.
Very good to listen to some hope for the better future for our country. No one should be appointed for at least for five years after retirement. The retirement age should be increased for Supreme Court at least on the lines of USA/ or upto 70 years. Retirement at 60/ 65 yrs. is making many Govt. Employees for seeking alternative jobs. Nowadays people can work for 70 yrs. due to better health. In the training at the time of recruitment the moral values and ideals specially the aspect of Dharma should be stressed. I had seen it vibrant in the villages at the time of Independence. 'Sathyameva Jayathe', was inscribed in our National Emblem. The educational system and the elders should think and develop "Healthy Public Opinion", which Gandhiji effectively used. The public awareness in this bonds case should be an eye opener and it should be continued for the betterment of public life and the image of our great country with great cultural heritage. I hope and wish people like you will continue the public debate developed at this time.
Very useful debate.but my question with due respect is only bjp? A list of full of members in many parties.starting from seniority diluted for next cji in Indira resim.what about mr bhushan? Regards Regards
I feel right wings people and lawyer and ex judges who finds themselves ideologically on same page .... They wrote the 2 open letters after watching these videos of Kapil sibbal n live law 😅 I feel these videos have point
To do away with 23:51 Partisanship all cases which has State as the party should be a Bench of 3 Judges.Why Central govt. employees hv cooling off periods
Sachin pilot
Rahul Gandhi
Varun Gandhi
Sasi tharur
Kapil sibal
DK Shivkumar
Revand Reddy
Priyanka Gandhi
Jairam Ramesh.... Great mindedness.. Great personality.
No hate speech... humanly gentle man.
Love to see them rulling India 🎉🎉❤
Listening to their interviews always been a joy.. inclusive politics.. ❤
Such debate should be on TV. It's healthy and democratic talks and carry messages for public of the truth behind the judicial systems in India.
Sir ! Modi tv won't allowed
Best debate we never come a cross. God bless all the participants.
😮
Lot of debates like this should be conducted throughout the country regarding established independent National judicial academy appointment should be transparent merit on basis from lower court to apex court 2) new courts establishment on population ratio 3) discover easy way to common man go to higher courts or facilitate technology to the rural area people filing cases in higher courts 4) court experience must be considered in appointing judicial posts even for small courts also 5) in all court premises lawyers chambers must be established
Meaningful discussion . In case of appointment of judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, there must be full time Independent Committee free from incumbent executives ,incumbent justices and political parties.
In the matter of post retirement assignment of judges there must be cooling off period of atleast 5 yrs.
.
I strongly believe this was the most fruitful and intellectual conversation I have seen ever. Hats off.
Really great conversation . Respect & Hats of to you all. 🙏
Excellent programme and very intellectual conversation. All of you are doing yeoman service for the Indian public. Unfortunately Honble Apex Court has delayed taking up important cases on priority like Ayodhya , section 370 and Electoral Bonds.
In 54 years of Congress rule, I wonder what Congress party might have done to Judiciary when even media was not free in those times (mainstream is not free even now), if this much harm BJP can do in just 10 years of continous rule.
Democracy is a myth just as privacy is in present digital age.
Excellent💯👍👏💯👍👏 program the issues were raised are real which have the deep concerns about the future of judiciary system and in what manners it can affect the future of indian democracy
This is the assurance that we have intellectual people in India who love our country . May God use you all as a mighty instrument . Salute for this initiative.
Very nice discussion regarding the judiciary by top intellectual lawyers . Just like us lawyers get valuable thoughts. Thanks.
it is so soul satisfying to watch stalwarts like themselves, discussing the fault lines and seemingly worried about it. as long as they are there we are still in the fight, to me they are the last bastion standing.
Salute to These courageous personalities keep it up. God bless you. From Kenya.
Great souls great subject and great exchanges❤
The live law did a great job to Judiciary by the conversation and salute to all the stalwarts of legal field.
This is called a meaningful discussion which I would like my children to listen and understand the politics not what present media is showing.
Excellent reviews and knowledge to the highest core dear Adv Kapil sibal and team.....i want this relayed on every Indian languages that common man is concetised.....come with more episodes Sir.❤😊
It's good👍 suggestion❤❤
Since judges get benefits from govt even after retirement , they may not be allowed any post under govt . After 5 years of cooling period they go for any post under govt but after surrendering all benefits being taken by them.
I m not judicial person but from audit background.
its basic sense you do not need law degree
are you a CA ?
Good conversation by honourable advocates of the supreme court of India as great thinker for democracy and judiciary
Mr Bhushan ur an asset to India. People will know ur value one day. Thank you sir. Mr Sibal too
We need these kind of programs more often. This will definitely educate the common man.
Highly objective and frank interaction among our top people. It's not only the judiciary but the bar as well that has to be fiercely independent in order to save and uphold the Rule of Law. They would have to rise above purely personal gains.
Abhijit gangopadhyay probably coerced to join party , such pity state for judges too .
Excellent debate. Honest views. Sad state of Indian judiciary more since 2014.
Raj Canada
Courage...... It is a fuel for living democratic country.
They are top legal minds in India , iam proud of them
Quite a few high courts are really of no use these days because of some judges uncontrollable inclination towards certain political parties!
😊❤
thank you sir hats off intellectual talks it is unfortunate to see some MP did not speak relevant problems concern states knowledge of subjects political parties select dynamic personalities as MP
salute to your vision and wisdom, what I could see there is no genuine views collaboration with the superior authorities of Supreme court.. It was a very impressive meeting by the Hon,able lawyers of the supreme court .May god bless them with courage to stand up for the right cause and provide the justice to save the Indian constitution ad democracy of Indi🙏🙏a
Great to listen such enlightening conversation and thanks to all advocates for conducting such show the problems in the democracy at any aspect is not always due to the systemic problems but also due to the lack of ethical values and knowledge and The end of democracy is not possible unless its citizens are satisfied with living in an undemocratic environment, hence citizens should demand free and fair institutions from their elected government as the first priority to save democracy.
That is a very heartening hope!
Very good conversation
I wish from this kind of discussions our news media could learn something
Thanks to Kapil sibbal sir for initiating this
Best of luck !
Super insights given. I can understand what will happen if the correct action before time.
Omg ,
what’s going on in judiciary,we are believing up to now that, people will get a justice at last in judiciary body 😢
Thank you for bringing
We need more discussions like these...great work.
wow gaint judges. salute to you all
Great conversation.. rightly pointed out the current affairs.. This practice will kill our judiciary even if the president government is changed.. cooling period is a good option atleast
Great people in these tumultuous time
Revered Great lawyers you are doing a great job To save the constitution,you are doing your job boldly without any fear country solutes you Sir,
A new law is required to keep the principles of neutrality, impartiality and dignity of judiciary for function ing healthy democracy in our country. Actually it is worrisome, that our judiciary going to lost its dignity. So, God save the Supreme Court had to written by Justice F. S. Nariman.
Wonderful discussion
This is very much needed talk
❤these conversations. Thank you.
Character building and character assessment at all levels of education and proper evaluation and using proper weightage for future career is something which we totallly lack at primary levels.
Live Law must have citizens also on debates.
Very good initiative by Sri kapil sibal
Really enjoyed it.
I absolutely agree with whatever they're saying. But when I heard sibal say the government shall not have any say in the appointment of judges... It was a 1000 deaths of Irony.
I believe that in the arena of politico-legal conglomerations at the highest levels there shall be some high level blue eyed legal fraternity in each Political Party favouring each other. And there would be no surprise that such high level judicial level quid pro quo connections prevail in the Congress Party also. Such a discussion of that nature may also be telecasted please, if any.
Too good👍
I believe the collegium, bar councils, and civil society should have discussions and set a high bar of both morality and submission to the Constitution along with yearly transparent service review based on the judgments decided, withheld or kept pending/reserved for weeks and months.
So called intelligent seniors advocates.
You are right Dushantji constitutional fathers never imagined our leaders will go so mean.
Excellent views ❤❤❤❤
God bless you with long lives.
Good conversations long live
Dave Sir is right!!!!
Thank you for this conversation 🙏
This discussion must be on the TV. Any Judge who joins party in one year after retiring must go to jail, this guys are not true judge, but cannot given this type of judges
These crooks lawyers has sell their soul for money.....shameless lawyers....tookta hu inpe
Good decision.
Good reporting .
COLLEGIUM SYSTEM IS NOT AT ALL GOOD BUT IT IS MORE INDEPENDENT THAN IF THE APPOINTMENT WERE WITH THE GOVERNMENT ❤agree with Prashant Bhushan
Term of the govt. No judge can retire and join the ruling party, good point on discussion
Lawyers always proven as vigilant citizen .🙏
vede vede jayate tatwa siddhi -With debate and discussion we can find the truth.Jai hind 🇮🇳🚩
These eminent advocates should also talk about the huge number of pending cases and everlasting resolution.
Because of this delay in judicial process we have totally lost the confidence in judiciary as it gives preference to the cases of elites and rich people.
Nothing shall happen. We cannot change the direction that the entire profession of law has taken. Our British Rulers politically united us and brought a system of law with which they were familiar. Without delving into their motives, we must acknowledge that they were successful in implementing what they thought good for maintaining the law and order. It would be obvious that they did not take up the task tinkering with the law based on custom . They did try to make uniform civil code. But they maintained the system of law and order to highest degree they could. They did not interfere with normal courts except in the cases when they were threatened with ouster. They appointed persons of moral integrity lest people may not go against them. The constitution of India is based upon the laws made by the British. We could not maintain the same respect for law by persons administering it because we are divided by religion,caste,community, race etc. Gradually we have reduced our constitution as a source power rather than an outline for governance of the vast country of so many divisions . Power rules us all and we do not care for poor and downtrodden because of their birth in poor family. Judges too are power hungry and they want to maintain it as ong as possible.
Mr. Sibbal is absolutely correct
Hats off intellectuals ❤
Intectual my foot.....crooks ,,,thieves lawyers
These fours are gems of our country
See the sensible disagreements ,we need such sensible information. Ideological inclination in the judicial is dangerous
Sir I selute to all of you
Evanescence of JUSTICE UNLESS A DANIEL*************
Wow what a wonderfully enlightening discussion. This current saffron sanghi savarkar mentality wave has taken Indian discourse/debate/discussions back to the stone age apes. Glad to see that still there is some sense prevailing.
Considering Mr Dave's opening remarks..why wud POLITICAL paties entertain any judge in the first place unless they give biased judgement in favour of the political parties
Good discussions, analysis and opinions. With what little knowledge I have about
politics and judiciary, l feel the
discussion would have been
better if you had included two other personalities of different
features, this team is a group of birds with the same feature
which will naturally flock together. Hope you do this in
your next discussion, to make
it more fruitful.
Hitesh Gupta one of the ruthless lawyer in vadodara Gujarat.
❤Gems❤
All India judicial exam should be conducted where directly district judge should be selected.only those judges should be promoted to be elligible for high court and Supreme Court judge.merit should prevail
Common man does not know about the Functioning of judiciary, only bar Association should raise to the occasion and do guide.
You eminent lawyers efforts may save the polarising present scenario in the country.
Surrender Yadav the judge decided Babri demolition criminal case given Additional Lokal by UP Government.
Jai Hind
Discussion was started with former justice of Calcutta High Court, Gangopadhyaya; resigning and within 48 hours joining the ruling party: Can we say it is like Campus Recruitment
Meenakshi nailed the fundamental issue. We have become a value-degraded society - a self-centric society, and so everything is up for grabs in the name of being 'successful'. The rot has to change right from our homes and school. We need to inspire our young minds to be fearless and push for values one cherishes as opposed to being cowered in fear all the time.
Here in kerala also certain judges express spl inteterest on certain matters if it is against govt.
💯💯
Yani ki soocho !! Agar Kapil Sibbal or Manu Singhavi agar CJI bana diye jate to kya hota????
Reminded of the lyrics of a movie, quote “जिन्हे नाज है हिंद पर वो कहा है”, well here they are!
Whatever opinion learner d law practitioners have but one thing is sure ultimately IT IS A MAN WHO MATTER
What about the guys employing plum posts under Congress.
just because judgment is not in your favor it cannot be construed as biased and quid pro quo ...this notion iteslf compromises independence of judiciary.
Apart from the criteria of eligibility, as a concern citizen, i think the best way forward are: to ban judges from any post retirement office including rajya sabha seat, independent judicial committee to review the performance of judges of SC as well as HC before appointed him as a judge, and remove the law minister from the collegium system..
In Rajasthan many judges have been attending the functions of the legal department of बीजेपी. Akhil bhartiya अधिवक्ता parishad. Legal department of congress has never invited the judges in it's functions as it would be very unfair to the judges.
Sir
What is your take on the "Advocates"Protection Act" ?
This development is expected since of late the top court has observed ( recent TAMILNADU CASE )that being a sympathizer of a political party is not a disqualification for the post of judgeship. Please remember today's politics is not the one we saw in 60's.
Nobody , neither Government nor Judiciary and section of lawyers are least bothered about the reform of the judiciary system. In the present judiciary system the people do not get right justice in right time. In the present judiciary system the people are suffering serious hardships during the time of proceedings of the case in the court hopelessly.
Very good to listen to some hope for the better future for our country.
No one should be appointed for at least for five years after retirement.
The retirement age should be increased for Supreme Court at least on the lines of USA/ or upto 70 years.
Retirement at 60/ 65 yrs. is making many Govt. Employees for seeking alternative jobs. Nowadays people can work for 70 yrs. due to better health.
In the training at the time of recruitment the moral values and ideals specially the aspect of Dharma should be stressed. I had seen it vibrant in the villages at the time of Independence.
'Sathyameva Jayathe', was inscribed in our National Emblem. The educational system and the elders should think and develop "Healthy Public Opinion", which Gandhiji effectively used.
The public awareness in this bonds case should be an eye opener and it should be continued for the betterment of public life and the image of our great country with great cultural heritage.
I hope and wish people like you will continue the public debate developed at this time.
@live law team can help me to understand what kind of mics you are using and how they are connected to one reciever
Very useful debate.but my question with due respect is only bjp? A list of full of members in many parties.starting from seniority diluted for next cji in Indira resim.what about mr bhushan? Regards Regards
I feel right wings people and lawyer and ex judges who finds themselves ideologically on same page .... They wrote the 2 open letters after watching these videos of Kapil sibbal n live law 😅
I feel these videos have point
To do away with 23:51 Partisanship all cases which has State as the party should be a Bench of 3 Judges.Why Central govt. employees hv cooling off periods