Talk with Sibal: PMLA Threatens the Basis of Indian Jurisprudence

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 เม.ย. 2024
  • #livelaw #legal #kapilsibal #pmla #advocate #lawyer #law #legal #justice #judge #lawstudents #lawfirm #legalknowledge #legalawareness #pmla #preventionofmoneylaunderingact #pmlaact
    LiveLaw brings you the latest legal news and updates from India and beyond.
    We are into fact based legal journalism.
    Endeavour of LiveLaw is to play an active role for a transparent and democratic legal ecosystem, in the larger public interest.
    This video is an intellectual property belonging to LiveLaw Media Pvt Ltd. Any unauthorised usage of this video/script in any format is prohibited and will be subject to prosecution.
    Stay updated. Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/2pskgB3
    Support Us: bit.ly/35qFj6A
    Visit Our Website: www.livelaw.in/
    hindi.livelaw.in
    Facebook: / livelawindia
    / livelawhindi
    Twitter: / livelawindia
    / livelawh
    Instagram: / livelaw.in
    / livelawhindi
    Linkedin: / livelaw
    / livelaw-hindi
    Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
    Android: bit.ly/2toaimp
    iOS: apple.co/39dQ0vh

ความคิดเห็น • 68

  • @amulyalabschandigarh1009
    @amulyalabschandigarh1009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Knowledge of criminal laws and procedures are related to rights and abuse of citizens and more important than learning history!!!

    • @redeyedbeast7975
      @redeyedbeast7975 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You just discovered fire. Congrats

  • @apsingh180
    @apsingh180 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Sir kapil sibbal,Not only the best lawyer of India but also very good human......

  • @swatikhanna2247
    @swatikhanna2247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Watched the whole video. It helps me so much to listen and revisit all that I've personally experienced as a lawyer who practiced in various PMLA cases in India. After studying the UK's Anti Money Laundering regime, I feel so appalled learning the fact that India's PMLA has a draconian nature when it comes to Civil confiscations (provisional attachments) whereas civil confiscations are rarely used during investigations in the UK because the State agencies fear a counter-case which a defendant (Accused) may file, if exonerated of the charges leveled upon them, thus, making State agencies liable to pay huge amounts as compensation to the acquitted defendant.

  • @legaledge3461
    @legaledge3461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This seems very draconian law !

  • @rajeevsri423
    @rajeevsri423 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Introduced by NDA government in 2003 but implemented by Congress UPA in 2005, both politucal parties are guilty of PMLA

  • @amulyalabschandigarh1009
    @amulyalabschandigarh1009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    V important knowledge. Should be taught to all citizens at school level in social studies. Basic legal procedures and rights of citizens and prevention of criminal abuse of every citizen . Will create interest towards law at that stage and also help citizens respect law right from teenage.

  • @sarveshsarvesh9769
    @sarveshsarvesh9769 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    हिंदी में बात समझने के लिए शुक्रिया sir

  • @theophilusdsilva8531
    @theophilusdsilva8531 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Who drafted this PMLA to become law. What about the Supreme court's decision on this Law. According to rule of law to give judgment guilt has to be proven.
    If guilt is not proven there is no case.
    This shows PMLA is completely wrong and CJI should take action against the people who drafted this law.

  • @ratangangopadhyaygangopadh9826
    @ratangangopadhyaygangopadh9826 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If ECIR (in place of normal FIR) is kept secret from the accused. In this aspect what was being done by the Opposition while the PMLA Act was being passed by the ruling dispensation as PMLA Act.

  • @theD2
    @theD2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for discussing all of it in Hindi.

  • @radhaenator
    @radhaenator 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So many people have come to conclusions about the accused on the basis of ED cases without knowing the law! A good primer on PMLA!

  • @deviprasadsingh972
    @deviprasadsingh972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Denial of ECR to accused hit by Article 14/21 of Constitutional. SC judgement on issue in correct.

  • @gulamshaikh6844
    @gulamshaikh6844 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    P.M.L.A. itself is a bad law.

  • @alhadsabadra5568
    @alhadsabadra5568 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    बेसिक कानून का उल्लंघन है , फिर भी सुप्रीम कोर्ट उसे असंवैधानिक नहीं मानता ?!

  • @vinodnagvadia9614
    @vinodnagvadia9614 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Andha kanun Save Constitution ONLY HOPE CJI

  • @amulyachandradas4953
    @amulyachandradas4953 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The lawyers of the country are requested to make a seminar
    to discuss on the PMLA and resolve to convey the Law Commission to review the very law and remove the provisions in it those are against the human right .

  • @vinayshankaremani
    @vinayshankaremani หลายเดือนก่อน

    How are these kinds of Laws in developed Countries? Can we learn from them?

  • @ShaonBaidya
    @ShaonBaidya 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He is most corrupted lawyer in india. Shame on you sibal.

  • @deviprasadsingh972
    @deviprasadsingh972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Circumventing or restricting courts power from making scrutiny of records amount to interference with independence of judicial process .

  • @shreyabhanj8994
    @shreyabhanj8994 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great show

  • @ge4517
    @ge4517 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everything disturbing ? When will India eradicate corruption or money laundering? Kapil Sibbal talking ?

  • @abhirai2803
    @abhirai2803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Genius discussion

  • @ge4517
    @ge4517 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kapil Sibbal is not an expert in law. His version of interpretation of law was pro opposition. Independent unlikely

  • @ramnarainprasad3683
    @ramnarainprasad3683 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    सुप्रीम कोर्ट इस रूल को असंवैधानिक क्यो नही कर देता ।

  • @krishnamoorthyramanathan7677
    @krishnamoorthyramanathan7677 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Under PMLA the ED has got specific information of predicate offence, and is in process of tracing and confirming the irregularities of PMLA; hence the person summoned is innocent and Not involved in the predicate offence either Directly or Indirectly, he/she Not entangled in any Benefits of such Predicate Offence, may be called but certainly can get Justice from Judiciary; but costs are Not Affordable to pay to the lawyers. Anyway the ED officials do not Normally issue Summons to Any Innocent, without sufficient reason, to call for Enquiry.

  • @Whexandra
    @Whexandra 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now it is too late to even discuss about the same. The provisions and codes has been already used to achieve purpose of the same utilised by the BJP to great extent but politically it appears to be boomerang. Meanwhile, Congress Party in general and Chidambaram in particular is guilty of promoting these sorts of absolutist miscarriage of justice and fair temporal concept.

  • @dolabehera
    @dolabehera 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good One. But I didn't like the last word of Kapil Sibal Sir "Ab kya kia jaye". Only problem part has been discussed. Hope the next session on PMLA would be solution centric.

  • @kuchbhi_kidhrbhi
    @kuchbhi_kidhrbhi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good insights.. plz also tell if any one file plea declare it unconstitutional

  • @jayendrashah2358
    @jayendrashah2358 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When "accused" makes a statement, whether understand caution or otherwise, he's is expected to tell the truth, nothing but the truth and he already knows what he has said without needing a copy from ED, if that's Ed's procedure.
    I think that the accused has a right to request presence of lawyer before he makes any statement or answers any questions.
    If ED asks for copies of the tax returns, bank statements etc. it should become quite obvious to any person, unless that person is naive as Sibal seems to make it, that the questioning is going to relate to the financial affairs.

  • @jayendrashah2358
    @jayendrashah2358 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My understanding of the law is the petitioner has to submit all documents to the court with a copy the same to the respondent and his agent, if there is one, and then respondent submits his defence with evidence, if there is any, before the hearing proceeds.
    Seems very one sided without a spokesperson from ED to explain its procedure and legal powers to withhold statements made subsequently.

  • @adit1001able
    @adit1001able หลายเดือนก่อน

    42:08 very important

  • @dr.rajendernathprasad767
    @dr.rajendernathprasad767 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No, comments

  • @ramnathkohli5876
    @ramnathkohli5876 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My comment disappeared.

  • @deepakd.4115
    @deepakd.4115 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Das saal pehle aapne income tax chori ki hai toh usko apradh nahi mana jayega

  • @panditjagdeepjanakrai2004
    @panditjagdeepjanakrai2004 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    mr kapil sibbal why do not you challenge vires and constitutionality of PMLA to hold it ultravires.

  • @ramdasthakare9535
    @ramdasthakare9535 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    क्या वकील कि दी हुयी वकील की फिस भी पि एम एल मे आयेगी.

  • @damscy4637
    @damscy4637 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kya PMLA ko khriz karna chahiye ?

  • @sayasargam
    @sayasargam 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maine to aaj tak ordinary cases bhi bina confession ke file nahi dekha, despite police knowing, that is not admissible.

  • @tkr1145
    @tkr1145 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr Shibal, Kindly make sure for self and 'yesmen' that the PMLA is to deal with white colour crimes that adversely
    affect the financial health &
    security of the country. Sec 45 like draconian provision is a "must" to DULY dealt with the
    Docoites engaged in "LOOTING" day in and day out.
    Has a single illiterate & innocent person yet, been booked under the PMLA? We solicit SC to make it more stringent.

    • @fishyslogger5590
      @fishyslogger5590 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Respectfully, the very fact that you are presumed GUILTY from the moment ED approaches you... So by your argument, ofcourse won't be innocent. The bigger question is, what about the big shots who are involved in the biggest 'Loot' of the real sort... Like the central government, in case you respect the electoral bond disclosure findings.... Sir.... What about ED approaching Modi for some questioning ???

  • @ridergeorge9
    @ridergeorge9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Koie vhi dhara lagwaiyee

  • @rajeshwarpandey3926
    @rajeshwarpandey3926 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He can be suspected accused.

  • @ponalgovind
    @ponalgovind 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    English subtitles please

  • @deviprasadsingh972
    @deviprasadsingh972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Horrible

  • @ridergeorge9
    @ridergeorge9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yehi toe mera policy tha summons ka isiliye

  • @vinodnagvadia9614
    @vinodnagvadia9614 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NPA ME PMLA KYO NAHI ?

  • @ankitkumar-qd3qk
    @ankitkumar-qd3qk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yah Kanoon sirf pmla Modi ji apne liye lae hain

  • @ridergeorge9
    @ridergeorge9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But jo kuch matter hea usme mea kuch nehi karunga

  • @aathijeganathan4729
    @aathijeganathan4729 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Pls speak inenglish

  • @kG-tk7hw
    @kG-tk7hw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Live Law is official spokesperson of kapil sibbal.

  • @sachbol3912
    @sachbol3912 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes corruption and corrupt should go scott free and immortality and unethical is in our DNA.....great SIBAL philosophy

  • @BalaramaiahNK
    @BalaramaiahNK 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sibal sir plz don't interrupt the guest speakers🎉🎉

  • @bachchaprasadsingh8598
    @bachchaprasadsingh8598 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bhrashtaachaar hi param satya hai😂😂

  • @maheshkumar-bq2bj
    @maheshkumar-bq2bj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what Judicial Prudence you are talking? ???
    The Indian Juridical Prudence is in pockets of 3-4 Pupil of Delhi Lutians .& few are in states.And YOU are the kingpin along with 1-2 more of your frends.