Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
But if you ask the govenment to do this, they will put you in jail. The only mandatory yet unwritten rule is not to marry and fkkk married women. Cheers.. ☘☘
Dada.. Slow, steady like a tortoise but you shared really good information. Indian Men can’t thank you enough for the support, knowledge, brotherhood provided in SIF. Victims are been tought to live life back like a king and fight false cases like a warrior. God bless this army of self supported and self-volunteered group.
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
Perfect advice. i did the same when my wife filed multiple criminal & maintenance cases back in 2013. I collected evidence & filed multiple criminal cases on her & her family members. Was able to secure arrest warrants against her, her father , mother, brothers in several criminal cases. Got her arrested. Settled the matter with 0 maintenance, visitation rights. Never ever paid any maintenance money to her during dispute years. Divorced. * My wife, father in law, brother in law, mother in law....all had to secure bail & furnish bail bond. * Several raids were conducted on their business & home. * Came out of depression & started a business with Rs 5000. Today running a successful business. ...as successful as I ever was. *Moral of the story. ...Fight back. Give them the taste of their own medicine. Don't let them inspire other blackmailers.
@@nehavv9544 it took 1 yr to get her arrested. And another few yrs to wrap things up. And I enjoyed my life, travelled and built a profitable business during these wonderful yrs.
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
100% correct ....and here i love the teachings of islam..... Which is completely in favour of the both.....in both cases....divorce or marriage ..... And no where,neither in any book,nor in any constitution ,no where is such beautiful ways for marriage and for divorce too...
This man is solid , I felt hopeful hearing his positive attitude solution towards a dark phase (divorce) of a man's life . When he said women used to bring something and man used to bring something and together they build a life together and the law called it dowry and made it illegal hit me hard. All my life i used to think dowry was bad i never thaught what was the reasoning behind such a practice.
Your comment is irrational, Bro. Mr Sarkar has had a bitter battle with his wife but he shouldn't start stating wrong things setting up men against women. Please don't be misled. While maintaining whoever is wrong should be punished and the law shouldn't be lopsided, I would like to point some of the factual errors in Mr Sarkar's statements. 1. Men and women were never equal; we lived and still live in a patriarchal society. 2. In almost all cases in the past and in most cases now it is the wife's family that hosts the marriage expenses and the groom is treated as if he has landed from heaven; you cannot deny this reality. It is weaved in our customs. 3. Since daughters didnot get a share in parental property, the groom's side DEMANDED whatever according to their status/greed and the girl's families went through a tough time in many cases to satisfy the 'in-laws'; if not Dowry what was this? If their greed wasn't satisfied the bride was ill-treated, assaulted, thrown out or even burnt! In the past, it was so easy for men to even take a second wife or have an affair openly. What is that equality statement Mrp Swarup Sarkar is making and you are supporting? How often does a man and a woman contribute equally as EQUALS and set up a home independently away from his parents? Yes, these days such marriages do happen sometimes. 4. Mother is and has always been the primary caretaker of the child. Even working women go through all the hassles to fulfill this role. Tell me honestly how many fathers are actively involved in total child care? There are always exceptions, let's not make that the main theme. 5. Todate, women are expected to take husband's family name; children also by default get father's name. Mr Sarkar's argument that the man with earning capacity should get the child custody too is like men having all the privileges. Isn't it unfair for the women? 6. He mentions 'genetically' in connection with men's contributions! It is laughable; he needs to take Biology lessons before his next speech. 7.Irresponsibly he speaks about insurance, providing for the family etc; it is deplorable. Everyone starts with good intentions only. By making irresponsible statements, he is setting up one sex against the other. After marriage, if a woman takes insurance won't she make her husband, the nominee? If his argument is followed, women should count and charge for every work they do at home (if they are housewives) while also taking care of his parents. Btw, how often men are expected to take care of their in-laws inspite of facing abuse? Disappointed with the host totally; she just provided him a platform and didn't interrupt even when he was saying wrong things. Let's be honest; let this men's movement be not a battle of sexes. There are 'people' of both sexes who misuse laws; let's work to change these laws, change our society's wrong attitudes, let there be pre-marital and also family counseling etc to bring some sense into wrong people. Even elders in families need counseling; through constant criticism and taunts they too spoil many marriages. Let's be more responsible with what we say and do.
@@Bappa108 2. In almost all cases in the past and in most cases now it is the wife's family that hosts the marriage expenses and the groom is treated as if he has landed from heaven; you cannot deny this reality. It is weaved in our customs. In last three years had 3 marriages of sisters and attended 2 marriages of close friends (female). In two cases, the expenses were equally shared, no demand of dowry. In two cases, the dowry was not asked but the girl's family insisted on paying. In one case, no dowry was asked or given, the expense was paid by girl's family. In all the five cases (and mostly 99% of marriages in India), the Guy was earning 2 to 3 times more than girls. Almost no girl prefers to marry a guy earning less than her. Expense of marriage (one time): 15-20 lac. If the average income of guy is 12 lac and the girl is around 6-7 lac per annum. In less than 5 years, the monetary expense will be balanced and girl will have a better standard of living. 3. Since daughters didnot get a share in parental property, the groom's side DEMANDED whatever according to their status/greed and the girl's families went through a tough time in many cases to satisfy the 'in-laws'; if not Dowry what was this? If their greed wasn't satisfied the bride was ill-treated, assaulted, thrown out or even burnt! In the past, it was so easy for men to even take a second wife or have an affair openly. What is that equality statement Mrp Swarup Sarkar is making and you are supporting? How often does a man and a woman contribute equally as EQUALS and set up a home independently away from his parents? Yes, these days such marriages do happen sometimes. In many cases, when the guy is earning well enough, the girls family is ready to pay dowry so that their daughter has a better standard of living compared to present live. Problem is, Your perspective is one sided.
Same situation. Don't get disillusioned though. We made mistake of trusting a Woman as Shakti when she was not. Shiv Shakti type unions are still possible. We just got stuck with a Surpanakha instead
Now the situation is different only one maintenance to be paid which is higher as per Rajneesh vs Neeha judgement.., And for divorce make the MOU properly with all the conditions.
Arnaz this was a very informative and moral boosting interview. Heartiest thanks to you for bringing up this discussion with Mr Swaroop. Tons and Tons of thanks for Mr Swaroop for giving such valuable insights and different perspective on being happy .I owe my evening to both of you. This really creates an Impact!!!
Let's face it. There are genuine cases & fake ones But the unfortunate part is...the system( advocates se le kar judges thak) encourages litigation. Sad state of affairs. Jio aur jeeno do.🙏
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
Congratulations Arnaz for getting such a gem of a person Mr Sarkar who has really nailed it. So much sense and real deep advice from the heart n soul i have rarely heard. Thanks n this interview is a real eye opener.
Don't get married guys.. very thought-provoking discussion.. Those who think this will not happen to me, as I am too smart or too caring are the biggest fools.. The laws are against men, period. You cannot escape it..
Men don't do research or listen to facts and based on emotions they marry then they suffer for their whole life. No wonder this channel is far too underrated. Just 15K subs. Share as much as you can guys.
Maternal aggression is a known brain circuit which appears after female giving birth and it is robust. That is a scientific fact. Social service should take maternal aggression in consideration in order to avoid divorce risk and save husband from aggression.
in Belgium you split 50-50 assets after marriage till the end of marrige and both are liable for debt. if one of them no matter male or female dont work at all then you can request for almony. Only child support you can not escape but if you pay you get tax exemption.
Not really, but it says a lot about female nature Women have a natural hatred of men, they either actively engage in it or passively enable it via their indifference
Staying with an NPD partner is tuffer. This is what abusive means guys. Law should be aware of these physiological aspects before declaring a judgment. Gentle neutral laws should be made.
there should be new law of fixed percentage of alimony or maintenance . new gender neutral laws should be introduced. and Indian legal system should allow options to choose prenuptial agreement and postnuptial agreement .
Swarup ji - What if people say something before marriage and then do something else after marriage ? What if your career hits a roadblock? What if finances take a hit? what if a better prospective comes along after marriage? What if your prospective towards life changes? Why not make divorces easier???
Fair and just but not easy ??? The problem with this line of thinking is that you're saying that marriage is a social institution before being a private institution, which is not true. This only shows a tendency of casteist society. Moreover, article 21 of the constitution gives me the right to speedy trial and life with dignity while article 19 gives me the right to form association and by extension dissociate when wanted. So keeping in view my fundamental rights, no person, govt or court can force me to stay in marriage if i say in open court that I don't want to continue in this marriage... How else do you think you can force 2 individuals to stay married if one doesn't want to stay in marriage irrespective of the reason???
If one party doesn't want to stay in marriage which fundamental rights do you think the party can invoke? They can only ask for damages and compensation nothing more... How do you think a 2 wheeler vehicle will move on road if one tyre doesn't want to move?
As soon as one file divorce ,interim maintanance will start and the wife wont come for hearing for years ,so husband will continue providing interim maintanance.
What about your father? I don't think he would have enjoyed his whole life without taking any kind of responsibility towards you and your family. He might have sacrificed his entire life, taking care of and protecting your family and fulfilling all your needs.
Yes, on the day of marriage itself people should start filling divorce, it could be from husband or wife, first come first service basis😅 Tomorrow is unpredictable so file divorce first😊
According to me women should not get any maintenance as she has to live on her own. Children care will be left to her . Since she carries child for 9 months.
According to this video either a man should never marry or should commit suicide the moment he sees any disturbance arising because according to him, the law of the state says the biggest fault of man is that he's husband. He says husband needs to take time to collect evidences now if his wife one fine morning decides to claim maintenance and stay away from husband she will easily slap a hefty unterim maintenance order against the husband without giving him chance to collect evidence. The husband will have to first fight against the imposed maintenance order
My wife separated from me 1.8 yrs ago. My 9yrs old living with me happily. I am living away from my family. It is just me and my son living from last 1.8yrs. I am not allowing my wife to talk to my son over phone from last 8 months as she is not sharing her office and her residence details. I dont want to lead life with her anymore.. please advise me hiw to proceed. She never showed any interest to live with me. Initially she showed interest for mutual divorce now she is not responding. She also issued RCR lawyer notice for which I did not respond. I dont want to give away my son if she seeks my sons custody. I am ready to fight legally. What should i do.. ple suggest Thank you
Marriage is battle of sacrifice and not bed of roses. Bollywood movies ne barbad kar diya ladko ki understanding of marriage law ke bare me. Lawyer logo ko apna pet chalana hai doosro ki cheeta par
Indian legal system should allow options to choose prenuptial agreement and postnuptial agreements or any relationship agreements as India is changing in the name of globalisation in rat race.
The situation now is that men want to marry a financially independent woman so that they don't have to pay the maintenance if divorce happens. At the same time, they are afraid of the arrogance of a financially independent woman (which will surely be there).
There is something called 'invisible work' that doesn't get paid; according to Economics it is 'non-productive' work. Do you know what it is? It is a housewife's work right from cooking , cleaning, producing and rearing children, caring for the other family members etc. Can you quantify or pay for this work? Just because a few men or women are toxic, it is wrong to brand everyone or talk lowly about the other sex. Mr Swarup Sarkar, at your age and with your experience and background you should be more responsible.Remember that a lot of young men are listening to your words; please be fair and responsible. Don't break the social fabric of the society.
A lot of app where live in without marriage. It's main issue for indian society culture. First try to stop in India. Then only you can argue any Indian lawyer.
No man who is facing false criminal charges along with hid completely innocent parents will ever be able to sympathise with your very laughable views, madam....
![[Live] : ONE FIGHT NIGHT 26 วันนี้!! “คริสเตียน vs อาลิเบก”](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UlIiZ3t8nHQ/mqdefault.jpg)
It should be made mandatory to watch this video before marriage in india
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
But if you ask the govenment to do this, they will put you in jail.
The only mandatory yet unwritten rule is not to marry and fkkk married women.
Cheers.. ☘☘
No one will give any guarantee advice for you to get married. It’s your own risk 😂
Dada.. Slow, steady like a tortoise but you shared really good information.
Indian Men can’t thank you enough for the support, knowledge, brotherhood provided in SIF. Victims are been tought to live life back like a king and fight false cases like a warrior.
God bless this army of self supported and self-volunteered group.
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
Perfect advice. i did the same when my wife filed multiple criminal & maintenance cases back in 2013. I collected evidence & filed multiple criminal cases on her & her family members. Was able to secure arrest warrants against her, her father , mother, brothers in several criminal cases. Got her arrested. Settled the matter with 0 maintenance, visitation rights. Never ever paid any maintenance money to her during dispute years. Divorced.
* My wife, father in law, brother in law, mother in law....all had to secure bail & furnish bail bond.
* Several raids were conducted on their business & home.
* Came out of depression & started a business with Rs 5000. Today running a successful business. ...as successful as I ever was.
*Moral of the story. ...Fight back. Give them the taste of their own medicine. Don't let them inspire other blackmailers.
How much time it took
@@nehavv9544 it took 1 yr to get her arrested. And another few yrs to wrap things up. And I enjoyed my life, travelled and built a profitable business during these wonderful yrs.
How you did this What evidence you had against her?
Feel jealous of you boss
@@nehavv9544 Too many years. But it was expected as I filed my 1st case after 1 yr of her 498A
So many key points mentioned, not just about marriage and divorce, but also how a man should live his days. I Salute you...!!
The most powerful and profound message about marriage in India !
My ex wife made life so miserable for me and son that there was no other way than for me to file for divorce ASAP. Most horrific 2 years of my life.
Sorry to hear that man. But congratulations on being able to resolve it in 2 years.
@@user-akshay398 all grace of God 🙏
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
Nice info When Life gets Tough.... the Tough get Going. Topic cud have also touched Human & Conjugal Rights of Men....
Thnx Arnaz for bringing Dada on this platform
Over the time laws are intentionally bent to promote harassment and extortion of men. This is continuing till date as well.
100% correct ....and here i love the teachings of islam.....
Which is completely in favour of the both.....in both cases....divorce or marriage .....
And no where,neither in any book,nor in any constitution ,no where
is such beautiful ways for marriage and for divorce too...
MARRIAGE IS NOT THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF LIFE 🔥
Hahaha yes true
This man is solid , I felt hopeful hearing his positive attitude solution towards a dark phase (divorce) of a man's life . When he said women used to bring something and man used to bring something and together they build a life together and the law called it dowry and made it illegal hit me hard. All my life i used to think dowry was bad i never thaught what was the reasoning behind such a practice.
Your comment is irrational, Bro. Mr Sarkar has had a bitter battle with his wife but he shouldn't start stating wrong things setting up men against women. Please don't be misled. While maintaining whoever is wrong should be punished and the law shouldn't be lopsided, I would like to point some of the factual errors in Mr Sarkar's statements.
1. Men and women were never equal; we lived and still live in a patriarchal society.
2. In almost all cases in the past and in most cases now it is the wife's family that hosts the marriage expenses and the groom is treated as if he has landed from heaven; you cannot deny this reality. It is weaved in our customs.
3. Since daughters didnot get a share in parental property, the groom's side DEMANDED whatever according to their status/greed and the girl's families went through a tough time in many cases to satisfy the 'in-laws'; if not Dowry what was this? If their greed wasn't satisfied the bride was ill-treated, assaulted, thrown out or even burnt! In the past, it was so easy for men to even take a second wife or have an affair openly. What is that equality statement Mrp Swarup Sarkar is making and you are supporting? How often does a man and a woman contribute equally as EQUALS and set up a home independently away from his parents? Yes, these days such marriages do happen sometimes.
4. Mother is and has always been the primary caretaker of the child. Even working women go through all the hassles to fulfill this role. Tell me honestly how many fathers are actively involved in total child care? There are always exceptions, let's not make that the main theme.
5. Todate, women are expected to take husband's family name; children also by default get father's name. Mr Sarkar's argument that the man with earning capacity should get the child custody too is like men having all the privileges. Isn't it unfair for the women?
6. He mentions 'genetically' in connection with men's contributions! It is laughable; he needs to take Biology lessons before his next speech.
7.Irresponsibly he speaks about insurance, providing for the family etc; it is deplorable. Everyone starts with good intentions only. By making irresponsible statements, he is setting up one sex against the other. After marriage, if a woman takes insurance won't she make her husband, the nominee? If his argument is followed, women should count and charge for every work they do at home (if they are housewives) while also taking care of his parents. Btw, how often men are expected to take care of their in-laws inspite of facing abuse?
Disappointed with the host totally; she just provided him a platform and didn't interrupt even when he was saying wrong things.
Let's be honest; let this men's movement be not a battle of sexes. There are 'people' of both sexes who misuse laws; let's work to change these laws, change our society's wrong attitudes, let there be pre-marital and also family counseling etc to bring some sense into wrong people. Even elders in families need counseling; through constant criticism and taunts they too spoil many marriages. Let's be more responsible with what we say and do.
@@Bappa108 you didnt counter me at all .
@@Bappa108 2. In almost all cases in the past and in most cases now it is the wife's family that hosts the marriage expenses and the groom is treated as if he has landed from heaven; you cannot deny this reality. It is weaved in our customs.
In last three years had 3 marriages of sisters and attended 2 marriages of close friends (female). In two cases, the expenses were equally shared, no demand of dowry. In two cases, the dowry was not asked but the girl's family insisted on paying. In one case, no dowry was asked or given, the expense was paid by girl's family.
In all the five cases (and mostly 99% of marriages in India), the Guy was earning 2 to 3 times more than girls. Almost no girl prefers to marry a guy earning less than her.
Expense of marriage (one time): 15-20 lac.
If the average income of guy is 12 lac and the girl is around 6-7 lac per annum. In less than 5 years, the monetary expense will be balanced and girl will have a better standard of living.
3. Since daughters didnot get a share in parental property, the groom's side DEMANDED whatever according to their status/greed and the girl's families went through a tough time in many cases to satisfy the 'in-laws'; if not Dowry what was this? If their greed wasn't satisfied the bride was ill-treated, assaulted, thrown out or even burnt! In the past, it was so easy for men to even take a second wife or have an affair openly. What is that equality statement Mrp Swarup Sarkar is making and you are supporting? How often does a man and a woman contribute equally as EQUALS and set up a home independently away from his parents? Yes, these days such marriages do happen sometimes.
In many cases, when the guy is earning well enough, the girls family is ready to pay dowry so that their daughter has a better standard of living compared to present live.
Problem is, Your perspective is one sided.
@@rationalsamrat3247 buddhi kamzor hai tumhari, isliye tumhe samajh nahi aaya.
✅✅✅ great. spot on. well written
Male empowerment is needed. Now that supreme court has said that gender is a spectrum, laws shouldn't be gender biased and gender specific.
Supreme kotha or politicians have no guts to confront women ...so never gender equality is going to happen in third world country like us
Very sensible suggestions!!
No words to say,
everyone should watch this video and understand it properly. Thank you so much 🙏
I'm adv I handle this type of cases.... Very Informative Sir well done
Ramswaroop ji bahut bahut dhanyvad
I was taking marriage as a religious institution, shiv-shakti, at the end of the day I understand these are the shit
Same situation. Don't get disillusioned though. We made mistake of trusting a Woman as Shakti when she was not. Shiv Shakti type unions are still possible. We just got stuck with a Surpanakha instead
Now the situation is different only one maintenance to be paid which is higher as per Rajneesh vs Neeha judgement.., And for divorce make the MOU properly with all the conditions.
This is the most insightful video I have seen on this topic. Thank you very much Mr. Sarkar.
This man is a godsend for men
Excellent approach by Swrup ji
Judiciary has made wife liability on husband and ruined family system.
Families are inherently misandric
Arnaz this was a very informative and moral boosting interview. Heartiest thanks to you for bringing up this discussion with Mr Swaroop. Tons and Tons of thanks for Mr Swaroop for giving such valuable insights and different perspective on being happy .I owe my evening to both of you. This really creates an Impact!!!
Thanks Arnaz, Swarup Sarkar explained everything in detail, Matrimomonial laws should be taught in colleges if not schools.
Let's face it. There are genuine cases & fake ones
But the unfortunate part is...the system( advocates se le kar judges thak) encourages litigation. Sad state of affairs. Jio aur jeeno do.🙏
Good work Arnaz and Swarup ji 👏
Great content. Thank you
Outstanding talk....eye-opening....
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
Really inspiring Dada............give us a lot of knowledge
Extremely valuable lesson learnt from this video...Thank you for this video....
Laws for weman protection specially intended to protect really crushed Women victimised from extreme atrocities. But in today’s arena Women in nature led by hyperGamy loses the respect and interest in his male partner causing the adverse behaviour and wrong approach towards partner. This thing hurts the basic male ego or natural male character and personality. This is escalated into legal matrimonial disputes and misuse of law. Courts Must not accept facilitate and motivate the false litigations filed on such escalations because 99% of women actually don’t have any moral ground for escalation to this extent. Misuse of such extremely harsh laws is like mis-using the Armed Forces bombs tanks and artillery to kill armless innocent people. Courts must immediately stop behaving like one-sided guardian or stepmotherly treatment against one gender. Because this is destroying the wheel of marriage in the society. The family system is the spirit of our nation and culture which is being destroyed by false legal system and legal culture and false laws of our country. It is absolutely inappropriate for the state and court to interfere in routine verbal spats or small quarrels in the life of individual couples and start considering such small things as physical or mental assault to allow one gender to loot the partner in the name of alimony or maintenance. Women should file a petition for maintenance or anything only if she is wife and stays with the husband. If she has willingly parted from her husband especially when there is no child she should not claim any money if she doesn’t want to stay. The narcissistic tendencies among women is increasing very fast. Courts must not encourage these socio-psychological development. Please send this message to all the judges lawyers lawmakers and society in general by all possible media.
Congratulations Arnaz for getting such a gem of a person Mr Sarkar who has really nailed it. So much sense and real deep advice from the heart n soul i have rarely heard. Thanks n this interview is a real eye opener.
Best advice and information given than any lawyer can provide.
❤ thanks dada
This was very very useful. This helped me clear a lot of misconceptions.
Very good n informative
I love you because your advice is loving
Very motivating!Dada
I feel Till date this is the Best advice that I have received
Don't get married guys.. very thought-provoking discussion.. Those who think this will not happen to me, as I am too smart or too caring are the biggest fools.. The laws are against men, period. You cannot escape it..
Very nicely and bluntly put forward
Men don't do research or listen to facts and based on emotions they marry then they suffer for their whole life. No wonder this channel is far too underrated. Just 15K subs. Share as much as you can guys.
Yes it actually gives you an advantage
Nice discussion
Such a great info..
Support you mam 🙏
Very good sir
Irony is even judges know 90% cases filed by wife are false,still they don't have guts to stand with husband.
I always wanted to become Swarup Sarkar sir,.....
Thanks
Child custody - somebody is eating in the restaurant and you are paying the bill .
Maternal aggression is a known brain circuit which appears after female giving birth and it is robust. That is a scientific fact.
Social service should take maternal aggression in consideration in order to avoid divorce risk and save husband from aggression.
Nice explanation 😊
Men should file divorce at first if cruelties are in criminal and antisocial nature
Dv भी नही लगेगा
in Belgium you split 50-50 assets after marriage till the end of marrige and both are liable for debt.
if one of them no matter male or female dont work at all then you can request for almony.
Only child support you can not escape but if you pay you get tax exemption.
This guy is spot on! A bit blah blah.. but spot on!
Arnaz, u r a great listener👍
Is divorce an industry?
Not really, but it says a lot about female nature
Women have a natural hatred of men, they either actively engage in it or passively enable it via their indifference
Please change the thumbnail of this video because no where in the video it was discussed that "Should Men File For Divorce First". Very disappointing.
Good Discussion 👍
Great and good layer
So the answer is yes or no ?
Save males 😪🙏🏽🙏🙏🏽🙏🙏🏽🙏🙏🏽🙏
Don't let them win. ...atleast not easily. Don't let her destroy another man & his family. Give her a tough fight.
& protest for gender neutral laws
Use your votes
I should have seen this video 5 years back
Mam is very beautiful
CRPC 125 should be removed, this is draconian law
we Men need gender neutral laws especially in India.
Nice hairstyle mam😊😊😊😊 can I copy that ??
Staying with an NPD partner is tuffer. This is what abusive means guys. Law should be aware of these physiological aspects before declaring a judgment. Gentle neutral laws should be made.
Please find out some ways for such lwas
Once a man marrys,the wife will be his liability till he lives and whether the wife stays with him or not....so frightening
Create a Trust file first then if u want to marry then marry. So that judge cannot touch trust file all assets will be in a trust name.
Need to connect with swarup sarkar
You can connect with him on Twitter @swarup1972
there should be new law of fixed percentage of alimony or maintenance . new gender neutral laws should be introduced. and Indian legal system should allow options to choose prenuptial agreement and postnuptial agreement .
Laws should be revised based upon current scenarios of marriages.
Swarup ji - What if people say something before marriage and then do something else after marriage ? What if your career hits a roadblock? What if finances take a hit? what if a better prospective comes along after marriage? What if your prospective towards life changes? Why not make divorces easier???
Why would someone be forced to stay in marriage?
Fair and just but not easy ??? The problem with this line of thinking is that you're saying that marriage is a social institution before being a private institution, which is not true. This only shows a tendency of casteist society. Moreover, article 21 of the constitution gives me the right to speedy trial and life with dignity while article 19 gives me the right to form association and by extension dissociate when wanted. So keeping in view my fundamental rights, no person, govt or court can force me to stay in marriage if i say in open court that I don't want to continue in this marriage... How else do you think you can force 2 individuals to stay married if one doesn't want to stay in marriage irrespective of the reason???
If one party doesn't want to stay in marriage which fundamental rights do you think the party can invoke? They can only ask for damages and compensation nothing more... How do you think a 2 wheeler vehicle will move on road if one tyre doesn't want to move?
As soon as one file divorce ,interim maintanance will start and the wife wont come for hearing for years ,so husband will continue providing interim maintanance.
If wife won't come for hearing. Then it happens 3 times by default divorce is granted.
😂rofl,sir it’s too good
Indian Judiciary has Castrated married men.
No prenuptial.
No counter cases to file even if got acquitted.
Pay the maintenance for wifes Adultery.
It would be better for the men to marry each other. They all are working, earning, and equal.
Please es video ko Hindi me bhi bnaye🙏
Hindi me caption/subtitles hai
Can u provide each case u ppl get on ur website. For reading and research purpose not the key judgements
Never get married
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
bengali accent👍👍👍👍👍
I wish someone could hv told me this before i got married
Listen up guys....don't marry or have kids if you can't make ends meet while one of you raises kids. Your mom's stayed home to raise you!!
What about your father? I don't think he would have enjoyed his whole life without taking any kind of responsibility towards you and your family. He might have sacrificed his entire life, taking care of and protecting your family and fulfilling all your needs.
Yes, on the day of marriage itself people should start filling divorce, it could be from husband or wife, first come first service basis😅 Tomorrow is unpredictable so file divorce first😊
According to me women should not get any maintenance as she has to live on her own. Children care will be left to her . Since she carries child for 9 months.
According to this video either a man should never marry or should commit suicide the moment he sees any disturbance arising because according to him, the law of the state says the biggest fault of man is that he's husband. He says husband needs to take time to collect evidences now if his wife one fine morning decides to claim maintenance and stay away from husband she will easily slap a hefty unterim maintenance order against the husband without giving him chance to collect evidence. The husband will have to first fight against the imposed maintenance order
Why not there's should be stop this law which is faced by family
My wife separated from me 1.8 yrs ago. My 9yrs old living with me happily. I am living away from my family. It is just me and my son living from last 1.8yrs. I am not allowing my wife to talk to my son over phone from last 8 months as she is not sharing her office and her residence details. I dont want to lead life with her anymore.. please advise me hiw to proceed. She never showed any interest to live with me. Initially she showed interest for mutual divorce now she is not responding. She also issued RCR lawyer notice for which I did not respond. I dont want to give away my son if she seeks my sons custody. I am ready to fight legally. What should i do.. ple suggest
Thank you
How to connect with swarup sarkar?
Bruh don't marry. Problem solved. There's no other solution.
Swarup ji, even women from joint family leave house for no reason.
Marriage is battle of sacrifice and not bed of roses. Bollywood movies ne barbad kar diya ladko ki understanding of marriage law ke bare me. Lawyer logo ko apna pet chalana hai doosro ki cheeta par
Indian legal system should allow options to choose prenuptial agreement and postnuptial agreements or any relationship agreements as India is changing in the name of globalisation in rat race.
❤
The situation now is that men want to marry a financially independent woman so that they don't have to pay the maintenance if divorce happens. At the same time, they are afraid of the arrogance of a financially independent woman (which will surely be there).
In such a dire unbearable unjust biased situation the only thing a man could do is : pray to God, 'उठा ले रे बाबा इस औरत को जितनी जल्दी हो सके उठा ले'
Can male can maintain physically custody of the child
There is something called 'invisible work' that doesn't get paid; according to Economics it is 'non-productive' work. Do you know what it is? It is a housewife's work right from cooking , cleaning, producing and rearing children, caring for the other family members etc. Can you quantify or pay for this work? Just because a few men or women are toxic, it is wrong to brand everyone or talk lowly about the other sex. Mr Swarup Sarkar, at your age and with your experience and background you should be more responsible.Remember that a lot of young men are listening to your words; please be fair and responsible. Don't break the social fabric of the society.
A lot of app where live in without marriage. It's main issue for indian society culture. First try to stop in India. Then only you can argue any Indian lawyer.
No man who is facing false criminal charges along with hid completely innocent parents will ever be able to sympathise with your very laughable views, madam....
Man can't file divorce first, if he does then must get fake cases...